Abstract
Establishing a small animal model that accurately recapitulates hepatotropic pathogens, including hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and immunopathogenesis, is essential for the study of hepatitis virus–induced liver disease and for therapeutics development. This protocol describes our recently developed humanized mouse model for studying HCV and other hepatotropic infections, human immune response and hepatitis and liver fibrosis. The first 5-h stage is the isolation of human liver progenitor and hematopoietic stem cells from fetal liver. Next, AFC8 immunodeficient mice are transplanted with the isolated progenitor/stem cells. This generally takes 2 h. The transplanted mice are then treated for a month with the mouse liver apoptosis–inducing AFC8 dimerizer and left for an additional 2-month period to permit human liver and immune cell growth as well as system reconstitution and development before inoculation with HCV clinical isolates. HCV infection, human immune response and liver disease are observed with high incidence from approximately 2 months after inoculation.
INTRODUCTION
Several human pathogens including HCV, HBV (hepatitis B virus) and HIV have a narrow host species restriction (i.e., to humans and chimpanzees). To overcome host species restriction barriers to studying these pathogens in small animal models, several human-mouse chimeric models containing hemato-lymphoid or liver cells have been developed1–3.
Development of human-mouse chimeric models for HCV
The Alb-uPA/immunodeficient mouse models, which contain the mouse gene encoding the plasminogen activator, urokinase (Plau, referred to herein as uPA) under control of an albumin (Alb) enhancer/promoter, allow for high human hepatocyte repopulation (90%) in chimeric mice; however, homozygous animals are unhealthy and die because of profound hypofibrinogenemia and accelerated hepatocyte death, if not rescued by transplantation of mouse or human hepatocytes1,4,5. Alb-uPA+/+ immunodeficient mouse with high human adult hepatocyte engraftment can be infected with HCV or HBV1. In addition, the fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (Fah)-BALB/c-Rag2−/− γc−/− mouse models also allow human hepatocyte engraftment and HCV infection6–8. However, these human-mouse chimeric liver mouse models lack a functional human immune system; thus, it is not possible to study viral-induced immunopathogenesis, and no virus-induced liver diseases are observed in the Alb-uPA/SCID or Fah-BALB/c-Rag2−/− γc−/− mouse models1,8.
To overcome the problems associated with human-mouse chimeric liver mouse models, we developed a novel humanized mouse model (AFC8) with both a human immune system and human liver cells. The AFC8 mouse is derived from the BALB/c-Rag2−/− γc−/− mouse carrying a liver-specific suicidal transgene with inducible activity. The BALB/c-Rag2−/− γc−/− mouse, which lacks functional T, B and natural killer (NK) cells, supports the development of a functional human immune system after intrahepatic injection of CD34+ human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)2,3,9. To facilitate engraftment and repopulation of human liver cells in BALB/c-Rag2−/− γc−/−mice, we expressed active Caspase 8 fused with FK506-binding domain (FKBP) under the control of the Alb promoter to enable drug-inducible suicidal activity in mouse liver cells (AFC8 mice; Fig. 1)10. We added an N-terminal myristoylation signal (M) to the transgene to promote membrane anchoring and added the simian virus 40 polyadenylation signal (SV40 PolyA) to improve RNA stability and translation (Fig. 1). We co-transplanted human liver/hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs) and CD34+ HSCs into the AFC8 transgenic mice and treated them with the FKBP dimerizer (AP20187; Fig. 2). The AFC8 mouse model allows the development of human liver and immune cells, thereby generating a mouse model, AFC8-hu HSC/Hep, containing both a human immune system (Fig. 3a) and hepatocytes (Fig. 3b)11. The AFC8-hu HSC/Hep mice supported HCV infection in the liver and generated a human T cell response to HCV. In addition, HCV infection induced liver inflammation and fibrosis, which correlated with the activation of human hepatic stellate cells and the expression of human fibrogenic genes11.
Applications of the model
The AFC8 model is the first humanized mouse model to incorporate a functional human-mouse chimera liver and immune system in the same animal, thus allowing the study of hepatitis virus–induced liver immunopathogenesis (Figs. 3 and 4). HCV infection in the AFC8 model results in increased numbers of human leukocytes (CD45+, CD3+ and CD4+, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, macrophages and T regulatory cells) in the liver and anti-HCV T cell immune response11. HCV infection in the AFC8 model is also associated with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and liver fibrosis11. The AFC8 model is thus ideal for studying the role of various human immune cells in the induction and maintenance of virus-induced liver damage and fibrosis. In addition, the AFC8 model is useful for evaluating antiviral drugs and immunotherapeutics (vaccines, neutralizing antibodies and so on). In addition to studying HCV infection and liver immunopathology, the AFC8 model could potentially be used to study liver immunopathogenesis induced by other hepatotropic pathogens including HBV, HDV (hepatitis D virus) and so on. Current small-animal liver fibrosis models use a chemical agent (carbon tetrachloride, diethylnitrosamine and so on) or surgical procedure (bile duct ligation); however, these models do not accurately mimic hepatitis and associated liver fibrosis in human patients, which are predominately caused by hepatitis virus infections12. The AFC8 model is the first model to recapitulate human hepatitis virus–induced liver fibrosis, thus providing a robust platform for preclinical evaluation of antifibrotic therapeutics. The widespread use of antiretroviral drugs has markedly reduced HIV–associated mortality; however, HIV and hepatitis virus co-infection, and its associated ‘enhanced’ liver disease, has emerged as a major mortality factor owing to shared transmission routes13,14. The AFC8 model is the only small-animal model capable of supporting HCV and HIV co-infection.
Comparison with other models
The AFC8 humanized mouse model uses a caspase 8–dependent induction of mouse hepatocyte apoptosis to promote human hepatocyte repopulation following co-transplantation of fetal liver/HPCs and HSCs. This method of mouse hepatocyte suicide is much less toxic compared with the UPA, FAH or hepatotoxicant (CCl4) model11,15,16. The ‘toxic’ models cause substantial liver damage during the promotion of human hepatocyte repopulation, thus making it impossible to study viral-induced liver diseases. On the contrary, the AFC8 model does not have background toxicity or liver disease because of the tissue-specific and tightly regulated mechanism of apoptosis induction in mouse hepatocytes (Fig. 1). This tightly regulated liver damage model could explain the higher repopulation potential of the AFC8 mice with fetal liver–derived cells as compared with the Alb-uPA or Fah mice11,17. The highly ‘toxic’ uPA and FAH mouse model liver environment, although highly permissive for adult liver–derived hepatocyte repopulation, could be inhospitable to fetal liver–derived cell repopulation.
In addition, the AFC8 model is the only humanized mouse model that enables hepatitis virus–induced liver immunopathology from the co-development of human liver and immune cells in the model11. Current human-mouse chimera mouse models do not have human immune cells; thus, the role of the human immune system in controlling infection or promoting disease cannot be examined16. The biggest disadvantage of the AFC8 humanized (liver and immune system) model is the level of human hepatocyte repopulation, which is approximately 15–25% compared with the uPA or FAH model that readily achieves human hepatocyte repopulation upward of 80% (ref. 11). However, it should be noted that the uPA or FAH models only show high human hepatocyte repopulation with human adult liver–derived cells but not with fetal liver–derived cells17. Transplantation of AFC8 mice with human adult liver–derived hepatocytes results in relatively higher human hepatocyte repopulation levels compared with fetal liver–derived cells (data not shown). The low hepatocyte repopulation with fetal liver–derived cells could partly explain why the virus genome is readily detected in the liver of infected mice but not readily detected in the serum of infected mice. In addition, the transplantation of fetal liver cells as opposed to adult differentiated hepatocytes in the UPA or FAH model results in a less mature human liver11. Differences in differentiation state between fetal and adult-derived hepatocytes could also explain the lack of serum HCV genome, as adult hepatocytes could more efficiently support higher viral replication and particle release in chimeric animals15,16.
Experimental design
The AFC8 mouse was developed on the BALB/c-Rag2−/− γc−/− mouse background according to protocols and methods approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Previous work by our laboratory and others has shown robust human immune system development in the BALB/c-Rag2−/− γc−/− mouse model. The FKBP construct was developed by ARIAD Pharmaceuticals and shows robust control of regulated target protein in a ligand-dependent manner (FKBP dimerizer—AP20187)18. Caspase 8 protein is activated by the formation of a dimer complex, and thus the FKBP was the ideal system for ligand-inducible activation, as this method has been used with great efficiency for similar purposes. The human gene encoding caspase 8 was inserted under the regulatory control of the FKP ligand–binding activation domain; this cassette was in turn placed under the transcriptional control of the mouse Alb promoter, including enhancer elements (Fig. 1). The resulting transgene construct has been robustly tested using cell culture methodologies. Optimal tissue-specific and ligand-regulated constructs were used to construct transgenic mice. The early liver (15 to 18 weeks gestation) is an active organ for hematopoiesis, thus providing a convenient source of both HSCs and progenitor liver cells. The human CD34+ marker is a pan-human HSC marker that has been widely used in HSC isolation and selection19. The human fetal liver cells include hepatoblasts and stromal cells, thus providing hepatitis virus target cells and supporting cells (hepatic stellate cells and endothelial cells) that have crucial roles in fibrogenesis11. Intrahepatic transplantation is recommended because it allows rapid and consistent transplantation of a large cohort of mice11. The animals should be irradiated before transplantation to eliminate residual mouse immune cells and hematopoietic lineage progenitor/stem cells and also to promote human cell engraftment and regeneration11,19. Human liver repopulation is promoted via the activation of the AFC8 model’s transgene. Humanized mice should be inoculated with high-titer HCV patient serum to ensure infection; PBS and virus-inactivated or uninfected serum should be used as controls. Untransplanted mice inoculated with patient serum can be used as controls to demonstrate that human cells are necessary for infection and liver pathology. In addition, during model development, mice transplanted with human adult hepatocytes were inoculated with patient serum to demonstrate that HSC-derived human immune system was necessary for anti-HCV immune response and liver immunopathology11.
Limitations
This model is, to our knowledge, the first and only small-animal model with both a human immune system and human liver cells for studying hepatitis virus infection and associated liver pathology. This model, however, has several limitations. The relatively low level of repopulation and the immature phenotype of the human hepatocytes are probably responsible for the very low serum levels of human albumin and HCV viremia11. This limits the use of the AFC8 model for longitudinal analysis of anti-HCV therapeutics. Furthermore, the immature hepatocyte differentiation may hinder the use of the model for examining human-specific xenobiotic metabolism and associated toxicity. Finally, similarly to all current mouse models with humanized immune system, the antiviral immune response may not be as robust as in human patients. Although HCV-reactive T cell response can be detected, the B cell response is relatively weak, with predominant IgM response and relatively low IgG response. Future studies addressing these deficiencies are needed in order to develop a fully robust preclinical model for studying hepatotropic pathogens, human immune response and drug metabolism and liver toxicity.
MATERIALS
REAGENTS
Human HCV genotype 1A clinical isolates. These should be obtained from HCV-positive patients with >1 × 108 genome copies per ml serum viral load. For negative control serum from the same patient, heat-inactivate HCV-positive serum at 65 °C for 4 h. Human mock serum should be obtained from healthy (HCV-, HBV-, HIV-negative) individuals ! CAUTION Patient sample collection must conform to governmental and institutional guidelines, and informed consent must be obtained from all human subjects or donors. Serum samples are infectious and should be handled using Biosafety level (BSL) 2+/3-recommended protocols.
Human fetal liver, 15- to 18-week gestation period (Advanced Bioscience Resources) ! CAUTION Human tissues should be handled using BSL2- recommended protocols and should be collected and used in accordance with all institutional and governmental ethics guidelines.
Newborn AFC8 mice (2 to 5 d old; BALB/c-Rag2−/− γc−/− mice, expressing active Caspase 8 fused with FK506-binding domain under control of the Alb promoter) ! CAUTION All experiments using live rodents must conform to governmental and institutional guidelines.
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMZ; Hi-Tech Pharmacal, cat. no. 0823-16)
AP20187 (induces FKBP/caspase 8 dimerization and activation, mouse liver apoptosis and human liver repopulation; Ariad Pharmaceuticals)
Liver digestion medium (Gibco, cat. no. 17703)
Ficoll (GE Healthcare, cat. no. 17-1440-03)
Human CD34 indirect microbead kit (Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-046-702)
Running buffer (autoMACS running buffer, Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-091-221; alternatively, use a 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% (wt/vol) BSA/PBS solution)
Rinsing solution (autoMACS rinsing solution, Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-091-222; alternatively, use 2 mM EDTA/PBS solution)
Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM; Invitrogen, cat. no. 12440-046)
Fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, cat. no. 16000044)
Penicillin-streptomycin (pen-strep; Gibco, cat. no. 1541)
Red blood cell lysis buffer (1× ACK lysis buffer; Invitrogen, cat. no. A10492-01)
L-Glutamine (Gibco, cat. no. 25030)
DNase at 5 mg ml−1 (Roche, cat. no. 10104159001)
Avertin (2,2,2-Tribromoethanol; Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. T48402)
Antibodies and dyes: human-specific CD34 (Clone AC136; Miltenyi Biotec, cat. no. 130-081-001), human-specific CD45 (Clone H130, BioLegend, cat. no. 304014; Clone 2B11 + PD7/26, Dako, cat. no. IR75161), mouse-specific CD45 (Clone 30-F11, BioLegend, cat. no. 103126), human-specific CD3 (Clone HIT3a, BD Bioscience, cat. no. 300306; Dako, cat. no. IR50361), human-specific CD123 (Clone 6H6, BioLegend, cat. no. 306008), human-specific CD11c (Clone Bu15, BioLegend, cat. no. 337208), human-specific CD19 (Clone HIB19, BioLegend, cat. no. 302210), human-specific CD14 (Clone M5E2, BD Bioscience, cat. no. 558121), human-specific CD68 (Clone KP1, Dako, cat. no. IR60961), human-specific albumin (Dako, cat. no. F011702), human-specific hepatocyte (HepPar1, Clone OCH1E5, Dako, cat. no. IR62461), human-specific α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) (Clone 1A4, Dako, cat. no. IR61161), human-specific glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (Abcam, cat no. 24109), 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD; Invitrogen, cat. no. A1310), LIVE/DEAD fixable yellow dead cell stain kit (Invitrogen, cat. no. L34959)
Trypan blue (Invitrogen, cat. no. 15250-061)
Human albumin ELISA kit (Bethyl)
Liquid nitrogen
RNAlater (Qiagen)
Sirius Red/Fast Green or Masson’s trichrome stain (Sigma-Aldrich)
EQUIPMENT
AutoMACS cell separator (Miltenyi Biotec) or other manual/automated cell separators
Hemocytometer
Guava easyCyte mini flow cytometer (Millipore) and/or multicolor flow cytometer
XRAD 320 biological irradiator (precision X-ray, CT) or other X-ray irradiators
Microscope lamps
27-gauge needles (-0.5 ml insulin syringes)
Heat lamp
Operating scissors
Scalpels
Microcentrifuge tubes
Aluminum foil
Paper towels
REAGENT SETUP
Cell wash buffer
Freshly prepare using complete IMDM with 2.5 μl of DNase added per 50 ml.
Antibody mix for CD34 + HSC yield and purity
Add 2 μl of human-specific CD34 FITC, 2 μl of human-specific CD45 phycoerythrin (PE) and 0.5 μl of 7-AAD in 50 μl of 2% (vol/vol) FBS/PBS solution per sample before staining.
Antibody mix for human immune repopulation
Add 2 μl of human- specific CD45 FITC, 2 μl of mouse-specific CD45 PE and 0.5 μl 7-AAD in 50 μl of 2% (vol/vol) FBS/PBS solution per sample before staining.
Medium
Freshly prepare using IMDM supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FBS, 100 U ml−1 penicillin and 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine.
PROCEDURE
Liver digestion ● TIMING 1 h
-
1|
Warm up the wash buffer in a 37 °C water bath.
-
2|
Add 2.5 μl of DNase for every 50 ml of liver digestion medium (this creates the liver digestion solution). Prepare 100 ml per liver to be digested.
-
3|
Pour a single 15- to 18-week gestation period human fetal liver into a 10-cm dish; use scalpels to separate the connective tissue from the parenchyma.
-
4|
Discard the connective tissue and chop the parenchymal tissue into small pieces (1–2 mm3). Alternatively, the tissue can be dissociated using automated tissue dissociators (for example, Gentle MACS, Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol.
-
5|
Transfer the tissue to a 50-ml tube with a 25-ml pipette; wash the dish with 10 ml of liver digestion solution and add it to the same tube.
-
6|
Fill the tube with liver digestion solution to a 40-ml total volume.
-
7|
Wrap the tube cap with Parafilm.
▲ CRITICAL STEP This will prevent contamination of the sample.
-
8|
Shake the tube for 5–10 s, place the tube in the 37 °C water bath for 30 min and shake the tube every 5 min.
-
9|
The larger pieces will settle to the bottom; remove the liquid portion and filter it through a 70-μm filter into a new 50-ml tube; place the new tube on ice.
-
10|
Add 35 ml of liver digestion solution to the tube (from Step 9) containing the larger pieces of liver tissue and repeat Steps 8 and 9.
-
11|
Spin the two tubes with liver cells at 252g for 10 min at 4 °C.
-
12|
Decant the supernatant, resuspend the cells with 40 ml of wash buffer and combine the tubes into one 50-ml tube.
Liver and HPCs separation ● TIMING 1 h
-
13|
Spin the suspension down at 18g at 4 °C for 5 min.
-
14|
Remove the supernatant and transfer to a new 50-ml tube and store on ice; this is for CD34+ HSC separation.
-
15|
Resuspend the pellet with 14 ml of wash buffer and transfer it to a 15-ml conical tube.
-
16|
Spin down the suspension from Step 15 at 18g for 5 min at 4 °C and transfer the supernatant to a new tube on ice; this will be combined with the supernatant from Step 14 for HSC purification.
-
17|
Resuspend the pellet from Step 16 with 14 ml of wash buffer and repeat Step 16.
The pellet should appear white or yellow (not red) in color. The light-colored pellet contains liver progenitor cells.
? TROUBLESHOOTING
-
18|
Resuspend the final pellet containing liver progenitor cells from Step 17 with 10 ml of wash buffer and transfer in a new 15-ml tube (labeled with the tissue identification number and liver progenitor cells); store the tube on ice until Step 50. Remove 20 μl and place in a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube. Add 180 μl of wash buffer to dilute. Count cells using a hemocytometer after trypan blue staining (mix 10 μl of cells with 10 μl of trypan blue and count clear cells as live cells).
Lymphocyte purification ● TIMING 1 h
-
19|
Spin down the collected supernatants containing CD34+ HSCs from Steps 14, 16 and 17 at 469g for 5 min at 4 °C, combine the pellets and resuspend in a total volume of 35 ml of wash buffer.
-
20|
Fill a 10-ml pipette with 14 ml of Ficoll and eject 11 ml very slowly at the bottom of the tube under the cell suspension.
▲ CRITICAL STEP Eject the Ficoll with a slow, constant flow, being extremely careful not to disturb the interface. Retain 3 ml of Ficoll in the pipette to prevent air bubbles.
-
21|
Carefully move the tube to the centrifuge, and then spin the suspension down at 1,880g for 30 min at room temperature (24 °C).
-
22|
Take a 10-ml pipette and remove the cells at the interface, trying to remove as little of the Ficoll as possible.
-
23|
Transfer the collected cells into a 50-ml tube and add wash buffer up to 40 ml.
-
24|
Remove 20 μl and add it to 180 μl of wash buffer in a 1.5-ml tube (labeled ‘ori10× dilution’) and place the tube on ice. Count the cells using a hemocytometer and trypan blue dye. You should recover approximately 5 × 108 cells from each tissue.
CD34+ cell purification ● TIMING 2 h
-
25|
Spin the suspension at 469g at 4 °C for 5 min and discard the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in 10 ml of wash buffer.
-
26|
Spin the suspension at 469g at 4 °C for 5 min and discard as much of the supernatant as possible without disturbing the pellet.
-
27|
Resuspend the cells in 400 μl of wash buffer for every 1 × 108 cells counted by trypan blue in Step 24.
-
28|
Add 100 μl of the FcR blocking reagent (in the human CD34 indirect microbead kit) for every 1 × 108 cells counted in Step 24 and mix well.
-
29|
Add 100 μl of the CD34-hapten-antibody reagent (in the human CD34 indirect microbead kit) for every 1 × 108 cells counted in Step 24 and mix well.
-
30|
Incubate on ice for 30 min.
-
31|
Add 40 ml of wash buffer to the cells.
-
32|
Spin down the cell suspension at 469g for 5 min at 4 °C and discard the supernatant.
-
33|
Resuspend the cells in 400 μl of wash buffer for every 1 × 108 cells counted in Step 24.
-
34|
Add 100 μl of the Anti-Hapten MicroBeads reagent (in the human CD34 indirect microbead kit) for every 1 × 108 cells counted in Step 24; mix well and incubate on ice for 30 min.
▲ CRITICAL STEP Failure to incubate for at least 30 min will result in lower CD34+ purity and yield.
-
35|
Resuspend the cells with 40 ml of wash buffer and spin down the cell suspension at 469g for 5 min at 4 °C and remove the supernatant. Resuspend the pellet in 3 ml of wash buffer and transfer it to a 15-ml tube (labeled with the tissue identification number and the protocol step number).
-
36|
Repeat Step 35 and transfer the residual cells into the same 15-ml tube (there should be a volume of 6 ml in this tube); put the tube on ice.
-
37|
Check the autoMACS cell separator machine to ensure that the run buffer and rinse buffer containers are filled (full) and the waste bottle is empty (not full).
-
38|
Turn on the autoMACS cell separator machine and run the cleaning program.
-
39|
Run the cell separation program using the cell suspension from Step 36, ensuring that the cells are well mixed.
-
40|
Rinse between samples if there is more than one.
-
41|
When finished, count the number of cells; if the positive fraction is lower than expected, re-run the negative fraction until desirable separation is obtained.
-
42|
Run the cleaning program and clean the machine.
-
43|
Combine positive fractions (CD34+ HSCs; if more than one) and label the tubes with the tissue identification number.
-
44|
Spin down the negative and positive fractions separately at 469g at 4 °C for 5 min.
-
45|
Resuspend each fraction in 10 ml of wash buffer and store on ice.
-
46|
Mix each fraction; take 20 μl from each fraction and add 180 μl of wash buffer to each (label the tubes ‘pos10× dilution’ and ‘neg10× dilution,’ respectively).
-
47|
Place the ‘pos10× dilution’ and ‘neg10× dilution’ tubes on ice. Note that you should have two 15-ml tubes containing 10-ml cell suspensions on ice, one labeled pos, one labeled neg, and three 1.5-ml tubes labeled ‘ori10× dilution’, ‘pos10× dilution’ and ‘neg10× dilution’.
-
48|
Add 180 μl of wash buffer to two 1.5-ml tubes labeled ‘ori100× dilution’ and ‘neg100× dilution’. Transfer 20 μl from tubes labeled ‘ori 10× dilution’ and ‘neg 10× dilution’ (ensure that the tubes are mixed thoroughly) to their respective 100× dilution tubes. Store all tubes back on ice. Determine CD34+ cell purity and number by staining the cells in tubes labeled ‘ori100× dilution’, ‘pos10× dilution’ and ‘neg100× dilution’ for CD34+, CD45+ and 7-AAD+ (dead) cells using an integrated flow cytometry—cell counter system or a combination of multicolor flow cytometry and the hemocytometer/trypan blue counting method. Use human CD34+ HSCs or a human CD34+ cell line and isotype antibodies as controls.
Cell preparation for injection ● TIMING 30–40 min
-
49|
Spin down the CD34+ HSCs obtained from Step 45 at 469g for 5 min at 4 °C and resuspend them with wash buffer to 1 × 106 ml−1.
■ PAUSE POINT CD34+ HSCs can be stored overnight on ice for next-day transplantation if desired.
-
50|
Spin down the liver/HPCs from Step 18 at 18g for 5 min at 4 °C and resuspend them with wash buffer to 1 × 106 ml−1.
■ PAUSE POINT At this point, liver progenitor cells can be stored overnight on ice for next-day transplantation if desired.
-
51|
Prior to transplantation, spin down CD34+ HSCs (from Step 49) at 469g and HPCs (from Step 50) at 18g for 5 min at 4 °C and resuspend each cell type with wash buffer to 0.5 to 1 × 106/17.5 μl. Mix approximately 0.5 to 1 × 106 HSCs and 0.5 to 1 × 106 liver progenitor cells (35 μl total volume) for each mouse to be injected.
▲ CRITICAL STEP Cell suspension must be prepared at an approximately 35-μl volume per mouse, as injecting animals above this volume will result in animal death or transplantation failure.
Transplantation of human cells ● TIMING 1.5 h
-
52|
Take the cells from Step 51 to the animal room.
-
53|
Irradiate 2- to 5-d-old newborn AFC8 mice in a sterilized paper bag with a single dose of 200 rad using Xrad or other irradiators.
▲ CRITICAL STEP Mice less than 2 d old have lower survivability and mice older than 5 d old are difficult to transplant because it is difficult to see the liver through the skin.
-
54|
Prepare an ice bucket wrapped with autoclaved aluminum foil in the hood.
▲ CRITICAL STEP Be careful when handling the foil so that the side the pups will be in contact with is not contaminated by unsterilized surfaces.
-
55|
Set up the warming light in the hood and put a cage lid covered with sterile paper towels under it.
▲ CRITICAL STEP This is for mouse recovery after cold anesthesia and injection.
-
56|
Put a clean cage, as well as the cage the pups are in, in the hood; separate the mother from the pups, move the pups to the clean cage and move the mother back to the housing rack.
-
57|
Place one pup on the foil in the ice bucket and let the animal cool for about 1 min.
▲ CRITICAL STEP This is for light anesthesia.
-
58|
Resuspend the cells immediately prior to injection every time. Load the syringe (27-gauge needles, − 0.5 ml insulin syringes) with the cell suspension at a volume of 30 μl per mouse.
-
59|
Remove the first pup and place the next on ice (the actual injection step takes only a few seconds and the other pup can be cooled down by the time you are finished with the first one).
-
60|
Restrain the pup by placing your index finger between its front legs (slightly cranially to where you would expect the collarbone to be) and your thumb between its hind legs and applying gentle pressure down and outward (just enough to pull the skin a little tight without injuring the animal).
-
61|
Begin by vertically positioning the needle slightly to the left of the right lobe and angled slightly toward the right lobe; push the needle in about halfway, and then deposit the cells into the right lobe at the rate of 2 s per injection volume. The liver should be visible as a dark area located cranially to the stomach; it should be the largest organ in young pups. The stomach is identifiable by a white color on the animal’s heart side. Release the pressure immediately with your fingers. Thereafter, remove the needle, being careful to avoid contact with your finger.
-
62|
Repeat Steps 58–61 until the last mouse has been injected; place the pups back in their nest and return them to the mother. Perform similar procedures as stated above on control mice using vehicle (wash buffer without cells; nontransplanted AFC8 controls). Also use commercially available human primary hepatocytes and human HSCs as controls.
-
63|
House mice in a pathogen-free facility and microisolator cages. Feed animals with autoclaved or irradiated food and maintain them on acidified autoclaved water with or without sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMZ) (7.8 ml of SMZ per 250 ml of drinking water) on alternate weeks for the duration of the animals’ lives.
▲ CRITICAL STEP Failure to keep mice under sterile conditions at all times will result in lower reconstitution and/or will increase opportunistic infections.
Human liver and immune system reconstitution ● TIMING 3 months
-
64|
Wean animals at 3 weeks of age and house at ≤5 humanized animals per cage.
-
65|
Continue to feed animals with autoclaved/irradiated food and maintain them on acidified autoclaved water with or without SMZ (7.8 ml of SMZ per 250 ml of drinking water) on alternate weeks for the duration of their lives.
-
66|
Approximately 3–4 weeks after transplantation, administer an intraperitoneal injection of AP20187 (Ariad Pharmaceuticals) at a dose of 5 μg per g body weight to AFC8/DKO-hu and control mice. Repeat the injection once a week for 4 weeks.
-
67|
At 16 weeks after transplant, heat AFC8-hu HSC/Hep and control mice with a heat lamp and bleed them by making a single 5-mm cut (nick) on the tail vein with a sterile scalpel. Collect 100 μl of blood per mouse in 1.5-ml sterile microcentrifuge tubes containing 100 μl of 20 mM PBS-EDTA and place it on ice; samples can be kept on ice for up to 12 h.
-
68|
Spin collected blood–PBS/EDTA solution at 469g for 10 min at 4 °C using a centrifuge. The top portion (plasma) can be used to examine human liver reconstitution. The bottom portion (peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)) can be used to measure human immune reconstitution.
-
69|
Resuspend the bottom portion (PBMCs) in red blood cell lysis buffer (1× ACK lysis buffer), incubate for 5 min at room temperature (25 °C), spin cells at 469g, repeat this procedure and resuspend in 2% (vol/vol) FBS/PBS containing human CD45, mouse CD45 and 7-AAD antibody mixture. Examine the human immune reconstitution (% of human CD45+ cells/total CD45+ cells) using flow cytometry analysis.
? TROUBLESHOOTING
-
70|
To measure human liver reconstitution, perform human albumin ELISA using plasma and the human albumin ELISA kit (Bethyl) according to the manufacturer’s procedures.
? TROUBLESHOOTING
Virus inoculation ● TIMING 2 h
-
71|
Administer a sublethal dose of Avertin (225–240 mg kg−1) via intraperitoneal injection to AFC8-hu HSC/Hep and control mice at 16 weeks after transplantation.
-
72|
Inoculate anesthetized AFC8-hu HSC/Hep mice or control mice via retro-orbital injection with 75–100 μl of human clinical isolates of HCV genotype 1a (1 to 5 × 107 genome copies per ml) or control (PBS, uninfected patient serum, heat- inactivated inoculum and so on)11. House and feed mice as described earlier.
HCV infection, liver disease and immune response ● TIMING 2–5 months
-
73|
for longitudinal analysis of infection, liver disease and immune response, bleed the mice as described in Steps 67 and 68, approximately every 4 weeks following the initial bleeding at 2 weeks after inoculation.
-
74|
Monitor the mice weekly and euthanize them at the chosen time point after inoculation. In our hands, HCV infection, human immune response, hepatitis and liver fibrosis were observed with high incidence 8 weeks after inoculation at the earliest. Animal survivability is markedly decreased 16 weeks after inoculation. Euthanize mice by administering 800 μl of Avertin (lethal dose). Collect 500 μl of blood (serum) and 500 μl of blood plus 500 μl of 20 mM EDTA (plasma and PBMCs) via retro-orbital bleeding.
-
75|
Perform cervical dislocation.
-
76|
Collect mouse tissues (spleen, lymph nodes, liver and others) immediately. For DNA/protein isolation, freeze tissues in liquid nitrogen or on dry ice. For RNA isolation, place pieces of various tissues in RNA stabilization solution (RNAlater). For cell isolation, place tissues in IMDM medium and keep them on ice. For histology and immunohistochemistry, fix the tissue in formalin and process as paraffin-embedded slides. Examine human hepatocyte repopulation in chimeric liver tissue at the point of euthanasia by staining formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded slides with human-specific albumin antibody or human-specific hepatocyte (HepPar1 antibody). Furthermore, human hepatocyte differentiation can be examined using real-time gene expression analysis of liver RNA from humanized and control mice.
-
77|
if you wish to study HCV infection and viral dynamics, examine the viral load by measuring HCV genomic RNA in the serum and liver using established quantitative RT-PCR methods20.
-
78|
if you wish to study human immune response, isolate leukocytes from the spleen, liver and lymph nodes using standard leukocyte isolation protocols. Determine the frequency, activation state and number of various human immune cells in the various tissues using standard flow cytometry protocols. Examine anti-HCV T cell immune response by measuring T cell activation and/or expansion after antigen stimulation using standard T cell assays.
-
79|
If you wish to study liver immunopathogenesis and fibrosis, examine hepatitis by immunohistochemistry (IHC); stain paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed liver slides with antibodies against human immune cells (human CD45+, human CD3+, human CD68+ and so on)11. Examine liver damage by measuring ALT levels in the serum/plasma. Examine liver fibrosis by staining the liver with either Sirius Red/Fast Green or Masson’s trichrome stain. Examine human hepatic stellate cell activation by staining with human-specific α-SMA and human-specific GFAP antibodies. In addition, human fibrotic genes expression levels in chimera liver tissue can be examined using human-specific primers (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1, collagen 1A1)11.
? TROUBLESHOOTING
Troubleshooting advice can be found in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Step | Problem | Solution |
---|---|---|
17 | Removal of red blood cells from the liver progenitor cell fraction | If the pellet is red, repeat Steps 15 and 16 until the pellet is yellow or white |
69, 70 | Infection of animals with various pathogens, including bacteria, will result in very low human reconstitution and illness | Maintain a clean facility and a germ-free colony through sterile procedures and techniques and the administration of bacteriocide and bacteriostatic agents |
● TIMING
Steps 1–12, liver digestion: 1 h
Steps 13–18, liver and HPCs separation: 1 h
Steps 19–24, lymphocyte purification: 1 h
Steps 25–48, CD34+ cell purification: 2 h
Steps 49–51, cell preparation for injection: 30–40 min
Steps 52–63, animal preparation and transplantation: 1.5 h
Steps 64–70, human liver and immune system reconstitution: 3 months
Steps 71 and 72, virus inoculation: 2 h
Steps 73–79, hepatitis virus infection, immune response and liver disease: 2–5 months
ANTICIPATED RESULTS
Human liver progenitor cell and CD34+ HSC isolation
Approximately 5 to 10 × 106 viable liver progenitor cells and 10 to 20 × 106 viable CD34+ HSCs at 80% purity should be recovered from each fetal liver (15–18 weeks gestation period).
Human liver and immune system reconstitution
At 16 weeks after transplantation, human immune reconstitution ranges from 10 to 90%, with a mean of ~40%; various human leukocyte lineages are developed in the liver and lymphoid organs. IHC staining with human-specific albumin or HepPar1 antibody shows ~20% human hepatocytes of total hepatocytes, with reconstitution generally ranging from 15 to 25%11. Human serum albumin levels of humanized mice are rather low at ~200 ng ml−1. Analysis of human hepatocyte metabolism genes using human-specific primers should show elevated gene expression levels11.
HCV infection, human immune response and liver disease
Approximately 50% of HCV-inoculated mice had detectable HCV genome in the liver; however, serum HCV genome was rarely detected in infected animals. HCV-infected humanized mice should have hepatitis (human immune cell infiltration and cytokine induction) and fibrosis (elevated Sirius red collagen levels, hepatic stellate cell activation)11. Note that 8 weeks after inoculation was the earliest analysis and detection time point that showed high incidence of infection, hepatitis and liver fibrosis11. Human T cells from HCV-infected humanized mice should show expansion in response to antigen stimulation11.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Su laboratory members for discussion and support. This work was supported in part by grants from a UNC University Cancer Research Fund innovation grant, from the US National Institutes of Health (AI076142, AA018009 to L.S.) and from a UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Postdoctoral Training grant (M.T.B).
Footnotes
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS M.T.B. and L.S. organized and wrote the article; L.Z., M.L.W., T.A.C. and G.I.K. contributed to writing the article.
COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS The authors declare competing financial interests: details are available in the online version of the paper.
Reprints and permissions information is available online at http://www.nature.com/reprints/index.html.
References
- 1.Mercer DF, et al. Hepatitis C virus replication in mice with chimeric human livers. Nat Med. 2001;7:927–933. doi: 10.1038/90968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shultz LD, Ishikawa F, Greiner DL. Humanized mice in translational biomedical research. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:118–130. doi: 10.1038/nri2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Willinger T, Rongvaux A, Strowig T, Manz MG, Flavell RA. Improving human hemato-lymphoid-system mice by cytokine knock-in gene replacement. Trends Immunol. 2011;32:321–327. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Meuleman P, Leroux-Roels G. The human liver-uPA-SCID mouse: a model for the evaluation of antiviral compounds against HBV and HCV. Antiviral Res. 2008;80:231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2008.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Meuleman P, et al. Morphological and biochemical characterization of a human liver in a uPA-SCID mouse chimera. Hepatology. 2005;41:847–856. doi: 10.1002/hep.20657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Azuma H, et al. Robust expansion of human hepatocytes in Fah−/−/Rag2−/−/Il2rg−/− mice. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:903–910. doi: 10.1038/nbt1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bissig KD, Le TT, Woods NB, Verma IM. Repopulation of adult and neonatal mice with human hepatocytes: a chimeric animal model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20507–20511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710528105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bissig KD, et al. Human liver chimeric mice provide a model for hepatitis B and C virus infection and treatment. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:924–930. doi: 10.1172/JCI40094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Traggiai E, et al. Development of a human adaptive immune system in cord blood cell-transplanted mice. Science. 2004;304:104–107. doi: 10.1126/science.1093933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pajvani UB, et al. Fat apoptosis through targeted activation of caspase 8: a new mouse model of inducible and reversible lipoatrophy. Nat Med. 2005;11:797–803. doi: 10.1038/nm1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Washburn ML, et al. A humanized mouse model to study hepatitis C virus infection, immune response, and liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1334–1344. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hayashi H, Sakai T. Animal models for the study of liver fibrosis: new insights from knockout mouse models. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;300:G729–G738. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00013.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Merchante N, et al. Survival and prognostic factors of HIV-infected patients with HCV-related end-stage liver disease. AIDS. 2006;20:49–57. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000198087.47454.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Operskalski EA, Kovacs A. HIV/HCV co-infection: pathogenesis, clinical complications, treatment, and new therapeutic technologies. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2011;8:12–22. doi: 10.1007/s11904-010-0071-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Jong YP, Rice CM, Ploss A. New horizons for studying human hepatotropic infections. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:650–653. doi: 10.1172/JCI42338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Robinet E, Baumert TF. A first step towards a mouse model for hepatitis C virus infection containing a human immune system. J Hepatol. 2011;55:718–720. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Haridass D, et al. Repopulation efficiencies of adult hepatocytes, fetal liver progenitor cells, and embryonic stem cell-derived hepatic cells in albumin-promoter-enhancer urokinase-type plasminogen activator mice. Am J Pathol. 2009;175:1483–1492. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mallet VO, et al. Conditional cell ablation by tight control of caspase-3 dimerization in transgenic mice. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:1234–1239. doi: 10.1038/nbt762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang L, Kovalev GI, Su L. HIV-1 infection and pathogenesis in a novel humanized mouse model. Blood. 2007;109:2978–2981. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-033159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lindenbach BD, et al. Cell culture-grown hepatitis C virus is infectious in vivo and can be recultured in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:3805–3809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511218103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]