Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2013 Oct 7;28(2):117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2013.09.008

Behavioral Effects of Developmental Methylmercury Drinking Water Exposure in Rodents

Emily B Bisen-Hersh 1, Marcelo Farina 3, Fernando Barbosa Jr 4, Joao BT Rocha 5, Michael Aschner 1,2
PMCID: PMC3979511  NIHMSID: NIHMS532027  PMID: 24210169

Abstract

Early methylmercury (MeHg) exposure can have long-lasting consequences likely arising from impaired developmental processes, the outcome of which has been exposed in several longitudinal studies of affected populations. Given the large number of newborns at an increased risk of learning disabilities associated with in utero MeHg exposure, it is important to study neurobehavioral alterations using ecologically valid and physiologically relevant models. This review highlights the benefits of using the MeHg drinking water exposure paradigm and outlines behavioral outcomes arising from this procedure in rodents. Combination treatments that exacerbate or ameliorate MeHg-induced effects, and possible molecular mechanisms underlying behavioral impairment are also discussed.

Keywords: Mercury, Developmental neurotoxicity, Behavior, Rodents, Learning

Introduction

Mercury [Hg] is a global pollutant that knows no environmental boundaries. Even the most stringent control of anthropogenic (Hg) sources will not eliminate exposure given its ubiquitous presence. Exposure to Hg occurs primarily via the food chain due to the accumulation of its methylated form, methylmercury (MeHg), in fish. Latest United States statistics indicate that 46 states have fish consumption advisories. In addition, Hg is a common pollutant in hazardous waste sites, with an estimated 3–4 million children living within one mile of at least one of the 1,300+ active hazardous waste sites in the United States [1]. The effects on intellectual function in children prenatally exposed to MeHg via maternal fish consumption have been the subject of two on-going major, prospective, longitudinal studies in the Seychelles [27] and the Faroe Islands [811]. A National Academy of Sciences [12] expert panel reviewed these studies, concluding that the weight-of-evidence supports MeHg’s adverse health effects, recommending that levels of Hg not exceed 5.0 μg/L in whole blood or 1.0 μg/g in hair, corresponding to a reference-dose (RfD) of 0.1 μg/kg body weight/day. It is important to recognize that the risk for MeHg exposure is not limited only to islanders with high fish consumption. The US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Mercury Study Report to Congress [13] estimates that, in the United States, 8% of women of childbearing age have blood Hg concentrations exceeding this RfD. Based on the annual number of births, an estimated 300,000 newborns in the United States alone may be at increased risk of learning disabilities associated with in utero MeHg exposure.

MeHg is a highly toxic agent that can cause irreversible damage to the central nervous system (CNS) and, since MeHg easily crosses the placental barrier, the developing brain is especially vulnerable to its adverse effects. Fetuses and neonates are particularly susceptible since MeHg can be transferred both through the placenta and breast milk [14] and the levels of cerebral Hg in fetuses after in utero MeHg exposure can be higher when compared with those of the exposed dams [15]. Additionally, exposure to MeHg during early development can be associated with subtle brain damage at levels much lower than those affecting the mature brain [16]. Evidence of developmental neurotoxicity from environmental exposure to MeHg was evident following the Minamata disease epidemic of the 1950s in Japan. Consumption of highly contaminated seafood led to minimal symptoms in pregnant women who later gave birth to infants exhibiting diffuse and severe cortical damage. Children displayed severe neurological disabilities, including impaired vision, speech and hearing, altered gait, paresthesias, mental retardation, and cerebral palsy [17]. Similar symptoms presented in Iraq following poisoning of seed grain used in homemade bread [18]. Populations with high fish intake have been the subjects of several epidemiological studies [see 19 for review]. Briefly, children exposed to MeHg in utero in New Zealand and the Faroe Islands exhibited decreased intelligence quotient (IQ) scores and impairment in memory, attention, language and visuospatial perception [20]. These epidemiological studies have reported greater developmental effects in males than in females [21], which are in line with experimental studies showing lower sensitivity of female mice to MeHg when compared with males [22], as well as the protective effect of 17β-estradiol against MeHg-induced neurotoxicity in male mice [23, 24]. In contrast, a longitudinal study of the Seychelles showed no evidence of developmental effects on cognition following prenatal MeHg exposure [25].

Animal models have been useful for studying the deleterious effects of MeHg across the lifespan. Although the neurological, sensory, and motor deficits observed in humans have been replicated in primates following developmental or adult exposure [26, 27], the current paper will focus on the neurobehavioral effects of MeHg exposure in rodents. In particular, studies using the MeHg drinking water exposure paradigm will be highlighted, as this in vivo procedure parallels the most common form of prenatal exposure in humans.

MeHg Drinking Water Exposure Paradigm

The MeHg drinking water exposure paradigm allows the administration of chronic, low dose MeHg to pregnant dams during periods of gestation and lactation, leading to indirect developmental exposure of MeHg to offspring. Prolonged exposure to low doses of MeHg (typically methylmercuric chloride in tap water) through drinking water is constant and maternally mediated, mimicking potential exposure occurring in human infants. Drinking water provides a convenient means for exposure because 95% of MeHg can be absorbed from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract [28] with its continuous cycling via the enterohepatic circulation. A disadvantage of this procedure is that because water is available ad libitum, the amount of consumption is not fixed. Daily and cumulative intake is determined both by the experimentally controlled concentration and individual differences in fluid consumption, which can also vary between phases of pregnancy [29]. Daily water consumption measurements are necessary to account for individual differences in fluid intake between subjects, and the addition of an empty cage containing a filled water bottle is useful for measuring fluid loss through spillage or leakage. It is also important to avoid high concentrations of MeHg in drinking water because of its metallic taste, which can cause decreased liquid consumption and, consequently, dehydration in long-term or chronic studies. Experimental evidence has shown that the liquid ingestion of MeHg-exposed Swiss adult mice is not different from controls when MeHg concentrations do not exceed 40 mg/L [30].

Length of exposure varies among studies, with some reports of exposure beginning 3 to 7 weeks before mating [29, 3134], and others focusing on gestation [35, 36] and lactation [3742]. Some reports of exposure beginning prenatally and continuing throughout the lifespan have also been undertaken [43, 44].

Hg Levels in Blood and Brain

In choosing MeHg treatment paradigms, an important consideration is the estimated blood and brain levels of Hg following the exposure protocol, as well as the extent to which levels are physiologically relevant to human exposures noted in the clinical literature. The concentration of Hg in blood and brain can be used as a biomarker of exposure and allows comparison of adverse effects across studies and different species [29]. In vivo rodent studies demonstrated at birth neuropathologic damage and neurobehavioral alterations at brain [Hg] of 4.5 and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively [45]. Perinatal MeHg treatment resulted in neonatal rat brain [Hg] of 3–11 mg/kg [46]. In rats, behavioral alterations after continual pre- plus postnatal exposure [until postnatal day (PND 16)] to 40 μg MeHg/kg/day led to brain [Hg] of 0.5 mg/kg at birth and 0.04 mg/kg at weaning [47]; 6 months exposure to 0.5 mg/kg MeHg in drinking water resulted in brain [Hg] of 5 mg/kg [48]. In children, delayed psychomotor development occurred at brain [Hg] < 3 mg/kg [46]. The threshold for observable clinical effects approximated brain [Hg] of 1 mg/kg [46] and the lowest-observed adverse effects level is at 0.5–1.0 mg/kg [Hg] [49]. In Seychelloid asymptomatic neonates, brain total [Hg] ranged from 0.026 to 0.295 mg/kg [50]. [Hg] of 0.1–0.4 mg/kg were detected in infants from Minamata [51, 52] and in two Iraqi babies who died from in utero MeHg intoxication, brain [Hg] were ~1 and 13.7 mg/kg [53].

Newland and Reile [29] assessed the quantitative relationship between blood and brain [Hg] following the MeHg drinking water exposure paradigm in rat neonates (PND 0) and weanlings (PND 21). Using this procedure, 4.5-month-old dams were exposed to MeHg for 4 or 7 weeks prior to mating and throughout gestation up to PND 16, in order to avoid direct exposure to the pups once they were able to drink from the water bottle. Blood and brain [Hg] were higher than those reported for less chronic exposure paradigms and paralleled maternal consumption during gestation but not during lactation. Brain [Hg] in offspring decreased between birth and weaning from 0.49 to 0.045 mg/kg in the low-dose (0.5 mg/kg) and from 9.8 to 0.53 mg/kg in the high-dose (6 mg/kg) groups. These brain [Hg] are well within those described in the human literature detailed above. MeHg concentrations of 0, 0.5, or 6 mg/kg resulted in exposures approximating 0, 40 or 400 μg/kg/day for the 3 groups, respectively. This protocol reproduces [Hg] levels that are toxicologically relevant to the human exposures detailed above, although indirect exposure to offspring may be more reliable during gestation than through nursing. Similarly, Stern et al. [43] measured blood and brain [Hg] concentrations following exposure to 0, 1, or 3 mg/kg MeHg across the mouse lifespan, with only half of the subjects continuing exposure post-weaning. Blood and brain levels closely resembled maternal consumption shortly following birth (PND 4) but concentrations declined between PND 4 and 21, with a greater decrease occurring in the perinatal only exposure group compared to the lifetime exposure group. Between months 14 and 26, brain [Hg] increased modestly in the 1 mg/kg group, but both brain and blood [Hg] increased significantly in the 3 mg/kg group. Therefore, MeHg exposure through drinking water is an effective way to increase [Hg] to toxicologically relevant levels, either through direct or indirect exposure, across the rodent lifespan.

Neurobehavioral Effects

Sensory and Motor Deficits

The relationship between MeHg-induced motor deficits and cerebellar damage in rodents has been well described [54, 55], including impaired rotarod performance [55], open-field activity, motor coordination, retarded or abnormal walking ability, delayed development of swimming ability, hind-limb dysfunction, delayed spatial alternation, radial arm maze learning and severe movement and postural disorders [see 56 for review]. Some of these effects are sex-specific [37] and the type and severity of the behavioral changes are dose- and time- dependent, with the most deleterious effects occurring subsequent to exposure in late gestation [57, 58]. These behavioral deficits resemble symptoms observed in humans in their scope, developmental timing, and affected systems [12]. Although some studies using the MeHg drinking water exposure paradigm during gestation support MeHg-induced alterations in offspring on measures of motor coordination [40, 44], somatosensory sensitivity [59] and locomotor activity [35, 37, 41], others have noted no effect in these areas, with rotarod performance (a measure of motor coordination) being the most inconsistent [35, 37, 38, 41].

Several studies have examined the effects of MeHg exposure on developmental milestones and reflexes, with mixed results. Dose- and time-dependent impairment on measures of grip strength, hind-limb cross (clasping reflex), and flexion have been found in rats following chronic exposure to 0.5, 5, or 15 mg/kg MeHg in drinking water for 16 months [59]. MeHg exposure through maternal drinking water and continuing until weaning (0.5 or 10 mg/kg) led to delayed negative geotaxis, an orienting response considered diagnostic of vestibular and/or proprioceptive function [38, 41, 60]. In contrast, rats exposed in utero to 0.5. or 5 mg/kg MeHg doses did not exhibit any deficits on measures of surface righting, elevation of head, gait, eye opening, onset of walking, startle reflex, or negative geotaxis [61].

Learning and Memory

Learning and memory deficits are a concern following developmental exposure to MeHg, as prospective studies of clinical populations have reported impaired scores on neuropsychological tests of memory, attention, and language [20]. Preclinical evaluation of a variety of learning and memory assays has revealed task-dependent effects following in utero low doseMeHg exposure through maternal drinking water (see Table 1). For instance, no significant impairment was found in mice or rats on measures of spatial memory as assessed by the Morris water maze or Y-maze [35, 38, 40, 41], reference memory as assessed by the modified T-maze [37], object discrimination [38], or passive avoidance [38]. Working memory impairment on the modified T-maze was noted for females, but not males, at 6 and 8 mg/kg MeHg pre- and postnatal exposure [37].

Table 1.

Neurobehavioral effects caused by developmental MeHg exposure through maternal drinking water in rodent models

Animal model Exposure time Dose Behavioral effects in offspring References
Rat, Long-Evans Se diet 3 weeks before MeHg exposure; MeHg exposure 2.5 weeks before mating to PND 16 0.5 or 5 mg/kg MeHg alone or in combination with 0.06 or 0.6 mg/kg Se diet alteration in response patterns under FI schedule; increased responding (5 mg/kg); no effect of Se diet on MeHg- induced behavioral alterations Reed & Newland (2007)
Rat, Long-Evans Se diet 3 weeks before MeHg exposure; MeHg exposure 2.5 weeks before mating to PND 16 0.5 or 5 mg/kg MeHg alone or in combination with 0.06 or 0.6 mg/kg Se diet no impairment in acquisition of DRH schedule; perseveration of high-rate operant behavior; no effect of Se diet on MeHg-induced behavioral alterations Newland et al. (2013)
Mouse, ARE-hPAP Tg GD 7 to PND 7 0.5 mg/kg ↓ exploratory activity; no impairment in spatial learning or motor coordination; ↑ immobility time on forced swimming test and tail suspension test Onishchenko et al. (2007)
Mouse, C57BL/6 GD 2 to PND 21 4, 6 or 8 mg/kg ↓ locomotor activity in novel open field (females); no impairment in motor coordination or reference memory; ↓ working memory on modified T-maze (6 and 8 mg/kg, females) Goulet et al. (2003)
Rat, Wistar GD 7 to PND 21 0.5 mg/kg MeHg alone or in combination with 100 mg/kg PCB126 diet delayed negative geotaxis (females); no impairment in spatial memory, object discrimination, motor coordination, passive avoidance or anxiety; hyperactivity in females (MeHg and PCB126 combination) Vitalone et al. (2008, 2010)
Rat, Wistar GD 1 to PND 21 1, 5 or 10 mg/kg impairment in motor coordination (5 mg/kg); no impairment in spatial memory Fujimura et al. (2012)
Rat, Wistar GD 1 to PND 21 10 mg/kg MeHg alone or in combination with 10 mg/kg PFOA ↑ locomotor activity; no impairment in motor coordination or spatial learning; delayed negative geotaxis; blocked MeHg-induced ↑ in locomotor activity (MeHg and PFOA combination) Cheng et al. (2013)
Mouse, B6C3F1 x CBA/J 4 weeks before breeding to PND 13 or throughout lifetime 1 or 3 mg/kg altered hind-limb splay distance; ↓ acquisition of choice behavior; altered wheel running (3 mg/kg, lifetime) Weiss et al. (2005)
Rat, Long-Evans Diet 3 weeks before MeHg exposure; MeHg exposure 2 weeks before breeding to PND 16 0.5 or 5 mg/kg MeHg alone or in combination with fish oil or coconut oil diet no impairment of developmental milestones; ↑ response rates on large FR schedules (perseveration); ↓ acquisition of DRL; ↑ breakpoint on PR schedule; no effect of fish oil or coconut oil diet Paletz et al. (2006)
Rat, Long-Evans Se diet 3 weeks before MeHg exposure; MeHg exposure 2.5 weeks before mating to PND 16 0.5 or 5 mg/kg MeHg alone or in combination with 0.06 or 0.6 mg/kg Se diet ↑ error rate and perseverative responding on spatial discrimination reversal procedure; no effect of Se diet Reed et al. (2006)
Rat, Long-Evans Diet 3 weeks before MeHg exposure; MeHg exposure 2 weeks before breeding to PND 16 0.5 or 5 mg/kg MeHg alone or in combination with fish oil or coconut oil diet ↑ error rate and perseverative responding during the first reversal on both spatial and visual discrimination reversal procedures; no effect of fish oil or coconut oil diet Paletz et al. (2007)
Rat, Long-Evans Se diet 3 weeks before MeHg exposure; MeHg exposure 2.5 weeks before mating to PND 16 0.5 or 5 mg/kg MeHg alone or in combination with 0.06 or 0.6 mg/kg Se diet ↑ breakpoint on PR schedule; enhanced reinforcer efficacy (5 mg/kg MeHg, 0.6 mg/kg Se) Reed et al. (2008)
Rat, Long-Evans 4 weeks before mating to PND 16 0.5 or 6.4 mg/kg ↓ acquisition of choice between concurrently available reinforcement schedules Newland et al. (2004)

PND postnatal day; GD gestational day; FI fixed interval schedule of reinforcement; DRH differential reinforcement of high-rate behavior; FR fixed ratio schedule of reinforcement; DRL differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior; PR progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement

Although little evidence supports impairment on preclinical assays reflecting memory processes, findings support a greater role for early MeHg exposure on operant behavior tasks assessing acquisition of a response-reinforcer relationship [see 62 for review]. In general, effects are most robust on tasks related to resistance to choice, behavioral flexibility versus perseveration, and reinforcement efficacy [31, 33, 34, 61, 6366], and behavioral effects are evident on several schedules of reinforcement.

Compared to controls, rats in utero exposed to MeHg (0.5 or 5 mg/kg) displayed significantly higher response rates under large fixed ratio (FR) schedules of reinforcement [61]. Typically, high rates of responding decrease as the FR requirement, or number of responses required for receiving a reinforcer, increases. A lack of ratio strain in the MeHg exposed group indicated by an increasing rate of responding is indicative of perseveration. Alterations in response patterns have also been noted on fixed interval (FI) schedules of reinforcement, in which the first response after a specified period of time is reinforced [31]. Similarly, rats exposed to the same MeHg exposure procedure showed no deficit in acquisition of a differential reinforcement of high-rate behavior (DRH) schedule of reinforcement [34], which reinforces short inter-response time between responses, but showed delayed acquisition of a differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior (DRL) schedule of reinforcement, which reinforces long inter-response time between responses [61]. Perseveration of high-rate operant behavior was particularly evident when responding on a DRH schedule was stabilized before switching to a DRL, suggesting that perinatal MeHg exposure impairs response inhibition and interferes with the acquisition of new behavior [34]. Rats exposed to MeHg through drinking water during gestation also demonstrated impaired response inhibition and preservation on spatial and visual discrimination reversal procedures [63, 64], as well as impaired acquisition of choice between concurrently available reinforcement schedules [66]. A motivational explanation for such behavioral changes arises from MeHg-induced increases in breakpoint, or maximum ratio obtained, under a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement, since breakpoint is used as a measure of reinforcer efficacy [61, 65]. It has been proposed that a MeHg-induced enhancement of reinforcer efficacy may lead to behavioral rigidity [65].

Maternal exposure to low level MeHg produced deranged and reduced outgrowth of neurites in the cerebral cortex of offspring [67], a possible mechanism for the long-lasting behavioral consequences observed following gestational MeHg exposure. In addition, a role for disrupted dopamine neurotransmission is supported by a selective increased sensitivity of behavior to cocaine under a FI schedule of reinforcement following gestational MeHg (5 mg/kg) exposure [33].

Emotional behavior, which can influence learning and memory processes, has also been assessed in rodents. While no effect was noted on the elevated plus maze [38], a measure of anxiety, evidence of depression-like behavior has been reported. Perinatal exposure to low dose (0.5 mg/kg/day) MeHg through maternal drinking water led to significantly longer immobility time on the forced swimming test and the tail suspension test [35], which was later reversed by chronic treatment with the antidepressant fluoxetine [68].

Antagonistic, Additive or Synergistic Interactions

The MeHg drinking water exposure paradigm is useful for examining the interaction (antagonistic, additive or synergistic) between MeHg and other contaminants or nutrients. The interaction between MeHg and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) has been examined, as both contaminants are found in the same food sources [41]. Rats from dams receiving drinking water containing both MeHg and PFOA (10 mg/kg of each) had decreased [Hg] concentrations in all tissue, compared to the MeHg only group. The combination treatment also blocked a MeHg-induced increase in locomotor activity. Interactions can also be examined by manipulating diet along with the addition of MeHg to the drinking water. The effect of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), also found in fish, combined with MeHg was evaluated through MeHg (0.5 mg/kg/day) in maternal drinking water and PCB126 (100 mg/kg/day) in food. Although assessment included developmental milestones, attention, spatial learning, motor coordination, object discrimination, anxiety, conditioned learning, and locomotor activity, hyperactivity in female offspring was the only difference found in the combination treatment group at 4 months of age [38]. This effect persisted when rats were tested at 20 months of age [39].

The evaluation of MeHg administered along with nutrients has revealed mixed results. Along with MeHg drinking water (0.5 or 5 mg/kg), fish oil or coconut oil was added to the diet of pregnant dams in order to examine the interaction between MeHg and n-3 fatty acids, which are found in fish and important for neural development [61]. Neither diet modified the effects of MeHg. A purified diet containing selenium (Se), an essential nutrient required for the activity of many antioxidant enzymes [69], significantly delayed or blunted the effects of MeHg on measures of somatosensory sensitivity, grip strength, hind-limb cross, flexion, and voluntary wheel-running when administered 100 days before exposure to MeHg drinking water in adult rats [59]. However, studies examining the effects of an identical Se diet (0.06 or 0.6 mg/kg) fed to pregnant dams on in utero exposure to MeHg through drinking water have reported no effect of Se diet on MeHg-induced behavioral alterations [31, 34]. Chlorella, a unicellular green algae that has been eaten as a nutritional food in Japan, enhances the tissue elimination of MeHg through stimulation of excretion [70, 71]. In addition, along with MeHg drinking water, continuous intake of 10% chlorella powder (CP) in the diet of mice for 4 weeks before mating through birth suppressed MeHg transfer to offspring, with both mothers and neonates in the CP diet group showing significantly lower blood and brain [Hg], compared to controls, 24h after birth [72]. No measures of behavior were included in this study.

MeHg-Induced Oxidative Stress and Nrf2-Dependent Neuroprotection

The deleterious effects of pre- and postnatal MeHg exposure may be due to transitory or permanent neurochemical changes during critical periods of brain development. However, the precise connection between these neurochemical changes and behavioral deficits is still elusive. Nevertheless, there is strong evidence linking MeHg toxicity and oxidative damage [73, 74]. In the developing brain, the glutathione (GSH) antioxidant system has been identified as a possible molecular target for MeHg toxicity. MeHg (1, 3, or 10 mg/l) in the drinking water of pregnant mice during gestation led to a dose-dependent inhibition of normally increasing GSH, glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and glutathione reductase (GR) in offspring [36]. A developmental increase in these antioxidant enzymes observed during the early postnatal period is proposed to protect the brain from a surge in oxygen concentration, and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, after delivery [75]. Increases in cerebral F2-isoprostane levels suggest that MeHg-induced disruption of the GSH system is correlated with increased lipid peroxidation in the developing brain. Alterations in the GSH system remained even after brain [Hg] levels decreased, leading to MeHg-induced long-term disruption of the GSH antioxidant system and pro-oxidative damage, rendering the brain more susceptible to the deleterious effects of ROS [36].

In addition to oxidative stress, glutamate dyshomeostasis has also been reported as an important event related to the deleterious neurotoxic effects elicited by MeHg during the perinatal period. Using the MeHg drinking water exposure paradigm in mouse dams, Manfroi et al. [42] investigated the exclusive contribution of MeHg exposure through maternal milk. The authors showed that the exposure of lactating mice to MeHg causes inhibition of glutamate uptake in the offspring’s cerebella, although this event was not observed in dams. The inhibition of glutamate uptake was correlated with increased oxidative stress, which is in line with the idea that MeHg-dependent glutamatergic hyperstimulation might result in excitotoxicity, leading to calcium dyshomeostasis and increased ROS generation [see 76 for review].

Evidence also supports a potential role for Nrf2 and the PI3K/Akt pathway in mediating MeHg-induced neurotoxicity (see Figure 1), particularly during embryonic development [7783]. Nrf2 is a leucine zipper transcription factor belonging to the cap ‘n’ collar family; it is involved in the induction of genes encoding antioxidant proteins, including those in the GSH family. When bound to its inhibitory protein Kelch-like ECH-associating protein 1 (Keap1), Nrf2 is targeted for ubiquitination. Upon exposure to oxidative stress, Nrf2 is liberated from Keap1. Keap1’s phosphorylation by protein kinase C (PKC) at serine 40 promotes Nrf2 dissociation and nuclear translocation [84, 85]. Nrf2 heterodimerizes with the small Maf family members of transcription factors and binds to the cis-acting antioxidant antioxidant response element (ARE) sequence in the regulatory regions of target genes encoding detoxifying and antioxidant enzymes/proteins, such as g-glutamylcysteine ligase (GCL), GSH transferase (GST) A1 and A2, GSH peroxidase (GPx), heme oxygenase (HO), NAD(P)H:quinone reductase and the glutamate (Glu)-Cys exchanger (Xc) [86]. Nrf2-knockout mice show increased sensitivity to a variety of pharmacological and environmental toxicants [86] and inhibition of SKN-1 (the mammalian homologue of Nrf2 in C. elegans) leads to shortened lifespan and increased sensitivity to stress [87]; skn-1 deletions or loss-of-function mutations also suppress oxidative stress resistance in the nematode [88]. Nrf2 activation directly inhibits Fas-mediated apoptosis, a substrate for caspase-3-like proteases and an effector of PK-like ER kinase-mediated cell survival [89].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic of MeHg -induced oxidative stress and Nrf2-dependent neuroprotection. MeHg causes increased production of reactive intermediates and GSH depletion. These events activate Nrf2 and upregulate the transcription of downstream antioxidant genes. Other signaling pathways, such as the PI3K/Akt, can modulate Nrf2 function. Variations in these upstream pathways determine susceptibility to MeHg.

A crosstalk exists between the protein kinase pathways and the Nrf2-dependent antioxidant system [90], with Nrf2 function controlled upstream by the PI3K/Akt pathway. Consistent with antioxidant response element (ARE)-driven gene expression, sub-μM MeHg concentrations trigger ROS production and increase PI3K activity and its downstream effector, phospho-Akt (p-Akt) [91]. PI3K is activated by a G-protein-coupled receptor or receptor tyrosine kinase, such as the insulin receptor (Ins-R) [92]. Once activated, PI3K phosphorylates PtdIns(4,5)P2 to form PtdIns(3,4,5)P3. Akt functions downstream of PI3K and is activated by phosphorylation at Thr308 and Ser473 [92]. There are three Akt isoforms (Akt 1, 2 and 3), members of the serine/threonine-specific protein kinase family [92]. Results from knockout and transgenic mice demonstrate that Akt isoforms play critical roles in development [93]. Depending on the tissue-specific promoters used to construct the transgenic mice, the animals with constitutively active Akt develop tissue hypertrophy and tumors [94]. Akt knockouts show defects in placental development [95], glucose metabolism, adipogenesis [96], and brain development [95, 97]. The three Akt isoforms show tissue specificities with Akt1 being highly expressed in the brain [95, 97]. Mice with targeted disruption of Akt3 demonstrate a distinct phenotype with a 30% reduction in brain volume and neonatal lethality [98]. The latter observations are consistent with MeHg’s widespread and diffuse damage in fetal and neonatal brain, characterized by hypoplastic and symmetrical brain atrophy, and reflective of aberrant cell division, migration, differentiation and synaptogenesis [17, 99102].

Although a potential role for Nrf2 and the PI3K/Akt pathway in mediating MeHg-induced neurotoxicity has been indicated in the literature, the majority of results were obtained in vitro (see above). Rand and collaborators [78] elegantly demonstrated in intact flies an indirect role for a neuroprotective effect of Nrf2 against MeHg. In this study, they demonstrated that the ectopic expression of Nrf2 decreased the morphological deleterious effect caused by MeHg exposure during critical periods of nervous system development in D. melanogaster embryo [78]. Thus, detailed studies with rodents are needed to establish a clear connection between MeHg exposure during critical periods of development with transitory or permanent changes in Nrf2 and the PI3K/Akt pathway and long-lasting morphological and behavioral deleterious effects in young and adult animals.

Conclusion

Early MeHg exposure can have long-lasting consequences likely arising from impaired developmental processes, the outcome of which has been exposed in several longitudinal studies of affected populations. Given the large number of newborns at an increased risk of learning disabilities associated with in utero MeHg exposure, it is important to study neurobehavioral alterations using an environmentally valid model/s. The MeHg drinking water exposure paradigm allows in vivo analysis of developmental exposure to MeHg at physiologically relevant levels.

The extent of neurobehavioral alterations found in rodents following perinatal MeHg exposure is task-dependent, with evidence in support of sensory, motor and learning deficits. Of particular interest are operant behavior tasks related to behavioral flexibility and reinforcement efficacy, which have important clinical implications for the acquisition of new information and rate of learning. Assessment at multiple time points should be undertaken to examine for how long these deficits persist. Furthermore, the majority of studies on MeHg-induced neurobehavioral function have used metal concentrations that are closely related to environmentally toxic levels. Studies with lower levels of exposure, approximating relevant exposures in the general population, are sparse and have not been systematically addressed. In addition, it is not known how genetic variation segregates with the severity of MeHg-induced effects. Possible therapeutic strategies for ameliorating these adverse effects can be examined using the drinking water exposure procedure. This model also allows for analysis of cellular and molecular correlates of behavioral impairment, such as alterations in the GSH antioxidant system, oxidative stress and glutamate dyshomeostasis. Future studies correlating biochemical and behavioral endpoints would be a valuable addition to the growing literature of MeHg-induced developmental neurotoxicity.

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by grant from the National Institute of Health, R01 ES07331 and R01 ES020852.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest Statement

None of the authors have any perceived conflict of interest with the content of this manuscript.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Water Quality Criterion for the Protection of Human Health: Methylmercury. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water, Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, DC 20460: 2001. EPA-823-R-01-001. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Davidson PW, Myers GJ, Cox C, Axtell C, Shamlaye C, Sloane-Reeves J, Cernichiari E, Needham L, Choi A, Wang Y, Berlin M, Clarkson TW. Effects of prenatal and postnatal methylmercury exposure from fish consumption on neurodevelopment: outcomes at 66 months of age in the Seychelles Child Development Study. JAMA. 1998;280:701–707. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.8.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Davidson PW, Myers GJ, Cox C, Wilding GE, Shamlaye CF, Huang LS, Cernichiari E, Sloane-Reeves J, Palumbo D, Clarkson TW. Methylmercury and neurodevelopment: longitudinal analysis of the Seychelles child development cohort. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2006;28:529–535. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2006.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Davidson PW, Strain JJ, Myers GJ, Thurston SW, Bonham MP, Shamlaye CF, Stokes-Riner A, Wallace JM, Robson PJ, Duffy EM, Georger LA, Sloane-Reeves J, Cernichiari E, Canfield RL, Cox C, Huang LS, Janciuras J, Clarkson TW. Neurodevelopmental effects of maternal nutritional status and exposure to methylmercury from eating fish during pregnancy. Neurotoxicology. 2008a;29:767–775. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2008.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Davidson PW, Jean Sloane R, Myers GJ, Hansen ON, Huang LS, Georger LA, Cox C, Thurston SW, Shamlaye CF, Clarkson TW. Association between prenatal exposure to methylmercury and visuospatial ability at 10. 7 years in the Seychelles child development study. Neurotoxicology. 2008b;29:453–459. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2008.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Myers GJ, Thurston SW, Pearson AT, Davidson PW, Cox C, Shamlaye CF, Cernichiari E, Clarkson TW. Postnatal exposure to methylmercury from fish consumption: a review and new data from the Seychelles Child Development Study. Neurotoxicology. 2009;30:338–349. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Davidson PW, Leste A, Benstrong E, Burns CM, Valentin J, Sloane-Reeves J, Huang LS, Miller WA, Gunzler D, van Wijngaarden E, Watson GE, Zareba G, Shamlaye CF, Myers GJ. Fish consumption, mercury exposure, and their associations with scholastic achievement in the Seychelles Child Development Study. Neurotoxicology. 2010;31:439–447. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2010.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grandjean P, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Jorgensen PJ, Weihe P. Umbilical cord mercury concentration as biomarker of prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:905–908. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grandjean P, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Steuerwald U, Heinzow B, Needham LL, Jorgensen PJ, Weihe P. Attenuated growth of breast-fed children exposed to increased concentrations of methylmercury and polychlorinated biphenyls. FASEB J. 2003;17:699–701. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0661fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, Debes F, Araki S, Yokoyama K, Murata K, Sorensen N, Dahl R, Jorgensen PJ. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1997;19:417–428. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0362(97)00097-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Debes F, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Weihe P, White RF, Grandjean P. Impact of prenatal methylmercury exposure on neurobehavioral function at age 14 years. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2006;28:363–375. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2006.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Toxicological Effect of Methylmercury. National Academy of Science, Committee on the Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, National Research Council, National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.US EPA. Mercury Study Report to Congress. V. Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards and Office of Research and Development; 1997. Health Effects of Mercury and Mercury Compounds. EPA-452/R-97-007. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Björnberg KA, Vahter M, Berglund B, Niklasson B, Blennow M, Sandborgh-Englund G. Transport of methylmercury and inorganic mercury to the fetus and breast-fed infant. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:1381–1385. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Watanabe, Yoshida K, Kasanuma Y, Kun Y, Satoh H. In utero methylmercury exposure differentially affects the activities of selenoenzymes in the fetal mouse brain. Environ Res. 1999;80:208–14. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet. 2006;368:2167–2178. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69665-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harada M. Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1995;25:1–24. doi: 10.3109/10408449509089885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Amin-Zaki L, Elhassani S, Majeed MA, Clarkson TW, Doherty RA, Greenwood M. Intra-uterine methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Pediatrics. 1974;54:587–595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Julvez J, Yorifuji T, Choi AL, Grandjean P. Epidemiological evidence on methylmercury neurotoxicity. In: Ceccatelli S, Aschner M, editors. Methylmercury and neurotoxicity. New York: Springer; 2012. pp. 13–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, Debes F, Araki S, Yokoyama K, et al. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1997;19:417–428. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0362(97)00097-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, Debes F. Cognitive performance of children prenatally exposed to “safe” levels of methylmercury. Environ Res. 1998;77:165–172. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1997.3804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gimenez-Llort L, Ahlbom E, Dare E, Vahter M, Ogren S, Ceccatelli S. Prenatal exposure to methylmercury changes dopamine-modulated motor activity during early ontogeny: age and gender-dependent effects. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2001;9:61–70. doi: 10.1016/s1382-6689(00)00060-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Malagutti KS, da Silva AP, Braga HC, Mitozo PA, Soares Dos Santos AR, Dafre AL, de Bem AF, Farina M. 17β-estradiol decreases methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity in male mice. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009;27:293–297. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2008.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rossi AD, Ahlbom E, Ogren SO, Nicotera P, Ceccatelli S. Prenatal exposure to methylmercury alters locomotor activity of male but not female rats. Exp Brain Res. 1997;117:428–436. doi: 10.1007/s002210050237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Myers GJ, Davidson PW, Cox C, Shamlaye CF, Palumbo D, Cernichiari E, et al. Prenatal methylmercury exposure from ocean fish consumption in the Seychelles Child Development Study. Lancet. 2003;361:1686–1692. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13371-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rice DC. Effects of pre- plus postnatal exposure to methylmercury in the monkey on fixed interval and discrimination reversal performance. Neurotoxicology. 1992;13:443–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rice DC. Sensory and cognitive effects of developmental methylmercury exposure in monkeys, and a comparison to effects in rodents. Neurotoxicology. 1996;17:139–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Magos L. The Toxicity of Methyl Mercury. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1987. The absorption, distribution, and excretion of methylmercury; pp. 24–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Newland MC, Reile PA. Blood and brain mercury levels after chronic gestational exposure to methylmercury in rats. Toxicol Sci. 1999;50:106–116. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/50.1.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dietrich MO, Mantese CE, Anjos GD, Souza DO, Farina M. Motor impairment induced by oral exposure to methylmercury in adult mice. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005;19:169–75. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Reed MN, Newland MC. Prenatal methylmercury exposure increases responding under clocked and unclocked fixed interval schedules of reinforcement. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2007;29:492–502. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2007.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rasmussen EB, Newland MC. Developmental exposure to methylmercury alters behavioral sensitivity to D-amphetamine and pentobarbital in adult rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2001;23:45–55. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0362(00)00112-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Reed MN, Newland MC. Gestational methylmercury exposure selectively increases the sensitivity of operant behavior to cocaine. Behav Neurosci. 2009;123:408–417. doi: 10.1037/a0014595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Newland MC, Hoffman D, Heath JC, Donlin WD. Response inhibition is impaired by developmental methylmercury exposure: Acquisition of low-rate lever-pressing. Behav Brain Res. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.038. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Onishchenko N, Tamm C, Vahter M, Hokfelt T, Johnson JA, Johnson DA, Ceccatelli S. Developmental exposure to methylmercury alters learning and induces depression-like behavior in male mice. Toxicol Sci. 2007;97:428–437. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stringari J, Nunes AKC, Franco JL, Bohrer D, Garcia SC, Dafre AL, et al. Prenatal methylmercury exposure hampers glutathione antioxidant system ontogenesis and causes long-lasting oxidative stress in the mouse brain. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008;227:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2007.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Goulet S, Dore FY, Mirault ME. Neurobehavioral changes in mice chronically exposed to methylmercury during fetal and early postnatal development. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2003;25:335–347. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0362(03)00007-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vitalone A, Catalani A, Chiodi V, Cinque C, Fattori V, Goldoni M, et al. Neurobehavioral assessment of rats exposed to low doses of PCB126 and methyl mercury during development. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008;25:103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2007.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vitalone A, Catalani A, Cinque C, Fattori V, Matteucci P, Zuena AR, Costa LG. Long-term effects of developmental exposure to low doses of PCB126 and methylmercury. Toxicol Lett. 2010;197:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fujimura M, Cheng J, Zhao W. Perinatal exposure to low-dose methylmercury induces dysfunction of motor coordination with decreases in synaptophysin expression in the cerebellar granule cells of rats. Brain Res. 2012;1464:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cheng J, Fujimura M, Zhao W, Wang W. Neurobehavioral effects, c-Fos/Jun expression and tissue distribution in rat offspring prenatally co-exposed to MeHg and PFOA: PFOA impairs Hg retention. Chemosphere. 2013;91:758–764. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Manfroi CB, Schwalm FD, Cereser V, Abreu F, Oliveira A, Bizarro L, et al. Maternal milk as methylmercury source for suckling mice: neurotoxic effects involved with the cerebellar glutamatergic system. Toxicol Sci. 2004;81:172–8. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfh201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stern S, Cox C, Cernichiari E, Balys M, Weiss B. Methylmercury in the mouse: blood and brain concentrations of mercury to 26 months of age. Neurotoxicology. 2001;22:467–477. doi: 10.1016/s0161-813x(01)00047-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Weiss B, Stern S, Cox C, Balys M. Perinatal and lifetime exposure to methylmercury in the mouse: behavioral effects. Neurotoxicology. 2005;26:675–690. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2005.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Castoldi AF, Onishchenko N, Johansson C, Coccini T, Roda E, Vahter M, Ceccatelli S, Manzo L. Neurodevelopmental toxicity of methylmercury: Laboratory animal data and their contribution to human risk assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008;51:215–229. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Burbacher TM, Rodier PM, Weiss B. Methylmercury developmental neurotoxicity: a comparison of effects in humans and animals. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1990;12:191–202. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(90)90091-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Newland MC, Rasmussen EB. Aging unmasks adverse effects of gestational exposure to methylmercury in rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2000;22:819–828. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0362(00)00107-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Newland MC, Reed MN, LeBlanc A, Donlin WD. Brain and blood mercury and selenium after chronic and developmental exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27:710–720. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lewandowski TA, Ponce RA, Charleston JS, Hong S, Faustman EM. Effect of methylmercury on midbrain cell proliferation during organogenesis: potential cross-species differences and implications for risk assessment. Toxicol Sci. 2003;75:124–133. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lapham LW, Cernichiari E, Cox C, Myers GJ, Baggs RB, Brewer R, Shamlaye CF, Davidson PW, Clarkson TW. An analysis of autopsy brain tissue from infants prenatally exposed to methylmercury. Neurotoxicology. 1995;16:689–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Takeuchi T. Human effects of methylmercury as an environmental neurotoxicant. In: Blum K, Manzo L, editors. Neurotoxicology. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1985. pp. 345–367. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Takizawa Y. Mercury content in recognized patients and non-recognized patients exposed to methylmercury from Minamata Bay in the last ten years. In: Tsubaki T, Takahashi H, editors. Recent Advances in Minamata Disease Studies. Tokyo: Kodansha Ltd; 1986. pp. 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Choi BH, Lapham LW, Amin-Zaki L, Saleem T. Abnormal neuronal migration, deranged cerebral cortical organization, and diffuse white matter astrocytosis of human fetal brain: a major effect of methylmercury poisoning in utero. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1978;37:719–733. doi: 10.1097/00005072-197811000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Day JJ, Reed MN, Newland MC. Neuromotor deficits and mercury concentrations in rats exposed to methyl mercury and fish oil. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2005;27:629–641. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2005.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Roegge CS, Wang VC, Powers BE, Klintsova AY, Villareal S, Greenough WT, Schantz SL. Motor impairment in rats exposed to PCBs and methylmercury during early development. Toxicol Sci. 2004;77:315–324. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Grandjean P. Methylmercury toxicity and functional programming. Reprod Toxicol. 2007;23:414–420. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cagiano R, De Salvia MA, Renna G, Tortella E, Braghiroli D, Parenti C, Zanoli P, Baraldi M, Annau Z, Cuomo V. Evidence that exposure to methyl mercury during gestation induces behavioral and neurochemical changes in offspring of rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1990;12:23–28. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(90)90108-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Eccles CU, Annau Z. Prenatal methyl mercury exposure: I. Alterations in neonatal activity. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1982;4:371–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Heath JC, Banna KM, Reed MN, Pesek EF, Cole N, Li J, Newland MC. Dietary selenium protects against selected signs of aging and methylmercury exposure. Neurotoxicology. 2010;31:169–179. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Motz BA, Alberts JR. The validity and utility of geotaxis in young rodents. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2005;27:529–533. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2005.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Paletz EM, Craig-Schmidt MC, Newland MC. Gestational exposure to methylmercury and n-3 fatty acids: Effects on high-and low -rate operant behavior in adulthood. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2006;28:59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2005.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Newland MC, Paletz EM. Animal studies of methylmercury and PCBs: what do they tell us about expected effects in humans. Neurotoxicology. 2000;21:1003–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Reed MN, Paletz EM, Newland MC. Gestational exposure to methylmercury and selenium: effects on a spatial discrimination reversal in adulthood. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27:721–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.03.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Paletz EM, Day JJ, Craig-Schmidt MC, Newland MC. Spatial and visual discrimination reversals in adult and geriatric rats exposed during gestation to methylmercury and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Neurotoxicology. 2007;28:707–19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Reed MN, Banna KM, Donlin WD, Newland MC. Effects of gestational exposure to methylmercury and dietary selenium on reinforcement efficacy in adulthood. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2008;30:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Newland MC, Reile PA, Langston JL. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004;26:179–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2003.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Barone S, Haykal-Coates N, Parran DK, Tilson HA. Gestational exposure to methylmercury alters the developmental pattern of trk-like immunoreactivity in the rat brain and results in cortical dysmorphology. Developmental Brain Research. 1998;109:13–31. doi: 10.1016/s0165-3806(98)00038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Onishchenko N, Karpova N, Sabri F, Castrén E, Ceccatelli S. Long-lasting depression-like behavior and epigenetic changes of BDNF gene expression induced by perinatal exposure to methylmercury. J Neurochem. 2008;106:1378–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05484.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Burk RF. Selenium, an antioxidant nutrient. Nutr Clin Care. 2002;5:75–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5408.2002.00006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Uchikawa T, Yasutake A, Kumamoto YT, Maruyama I, Kumamoto S, Ando Y. The influence of Parachlorella beyerinckii CK-5 on the absorption and excretion of methylmercury in mice. J Toxicol Sci. 2010;35:101–105. doi: 10.2131/jts.35.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Uchikawa T, Kumamoto YT, Maruyama I, Kumamoto S, Ando Y, Yasutake A. The enhanced elimination of tissue methylmercury in Parachlorella beijerinckii-fed mice. J Toxicol Sci. 2011a;36:121–126. doi: 10.2131/jts.36.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Uchikawa T, Maruyama I, Kumamoto S, Ando Y, Yasutake A. Chlorella suppresses methylmercury transfer to the fetus in pregnant mice. J Toxicol Sci. 2011b;36:675–680. doi: 10.2131/jts.36.675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Aschner M, Syversen T, Souza DO, Rocha JB, Farina M. Involvement of glutamate and reactive oxygen species in methylmercury neurotoxicity. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2007;40:285–91. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2007000300001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Farina M, Aschner M, Rocha JB. Oxidative stress in MeHg-induced neurotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;256:405–17. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Khan JY, Black SM. Developmental changes in murine brain antioxidant enzymes. Pediatr Res. 2003;54:77–82. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000065736.69214.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Farina M, Avila DS, da Rocha JB, Aschner M. Metals, oxidative stress and neurodegeneration: a focus on iron, manganese and mercury. Neurochem Int. 2013;62:575–94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2012.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Toyama T, Sumi D, Shinkai Y, Yasutake A, Taguchi K, Tong KI, Yamamoto M, Kumagai Y. Cytoprotective role of Nrf2/Keap1 system in methylmercury toxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;363:645–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rand MD, Dao JC, Clason TA. Methylmercury disruption of embryonic neural development in Drosophila. Neurotoxicology. 2009;30:794–802. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wang L, Jiang H, Yin Z, Aschner M, Cai J. Methylmercury toxicity and Nrf2-dependent detoxification in astrocytes. Toxicol Sci. 2009;107:135–43. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ni M, Li X, Yin Z, Sidoryk-Węgrzynowicz M, Jiang H, Farina M, Rocha JB, Syversen T, Aschner M. Comparative study on the response of rat primary astrocytes and microglia to methylmercury toxicity. Glia. 2011;59:810–20. doi: 10.1002/glia.21153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Toyama T, Shinkai Y, Yasutake A, Uchida K, Yamamoto M, Kumagai Y. Isothiocyanates reduce mercury accumulation via an Nrf2-dependent mechanism during exposure of mice to methylmercury. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:1117–22. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1003123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hwang GW. Role of intracellular defense factors against methylmercury toxicity. Biol Pharm Bull. 2012;35:1881–4. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b212019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kumagai Y, Kanda H, Shinkai Y, Toyama T. The role of the keap1/nrf2 pathway in the cellular response to methylmercury. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/848279. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Huang HC, Nguyen T, Pickett CB. Phosphorylation of Nrf2 at ser-40 by protein kinase C regulates antioxidant response element-mediated transcription. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:42769–42774. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206911200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Bloom DA, Jaiswal AK. Phosphorylation of Nrf2 at Ser40 by protein kinase c in response to antioxidants leads to the release of Nrf2 from INrf2, but is not required for Nrf2 stabilization/accumulation in the nucleus and transcriptional activation of antioxidant response element-mediated NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase-1 gene expression. J BiolChem. 2003;278:44675–44682. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307633200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kensler TW, Wakabayashi N, Biswal S. Cell survival responses to environmental stresses via the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007;47:89–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.46.120604.141046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kell A, Ventura N, Kahn N, Johnson TE. Activation of SKN -1 by novel kinases in Caenorhabditis elegans. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;43:1560–1566. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.08.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tullet JM, Hertweck M, An JH, Baker J, Hwang JY, Liu S, Oliveira RP, Baumeister R, Blackwell TK. Direct inhibition of the longevity-promoting factor SKN-1 by insulin-like signaling in C. elegans. Cell. 2008;132:1025–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Morito N, Yoh K, Itoh K, Hirayama A, Koyama A, Yamamoto M, Takahashi S. Nrf2 regulates the sensitivity of death receptor signals by affecting intracellular glutathione levels. Oncogene. 2003;22:9275–9281. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Sherratt PJ, Huang HC, Nguyen T, Pickett CB. Role of protein phosphorylation in the regulation of NF-E2-related factor 2 activity. Method Enzymol. 2004;378:286–301. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(04)78022-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chen XL, Dodd G, Thomas S, Zhang X, Wasserman MA, Rovin BH, Kunsch C. Activation of Nrf2/ARE pathways protects endothelial cells from oxidant injury and inhibits inflammatory gene expression. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;290:H1862–H1870. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00651.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Fayard E, Tintignac LA, Baudry A, Hemmings BA. Protein kinase B/Akt at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:5675–5678. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Malstrom S, Tili E, Kappes D, Ceci JD, Tsichlis PN. Tumor induction by an Lck-MyrAkt transgene is delayed by mechanisms controlling the size of the thymus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:14967–14972. doi: 10.1073/pnas.231467698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Rathmell JC, Elstrom RL, Cinalli RM, Thompson CB. Activated Akt promotes increased resting T cell size, CD28-independent T cell growth, and development of autoimmunity and lymphoma. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33:2223–2232. doi: 10.1002/eji.200324048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Yang ZZ, Tschopp O, Hemmings-Mieszczak M, Feng J, Brodbeck D, Perentes E, Hemmings BA. Protein kinase B alpha/Akt1 regulates placental development and fetal growth. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:32124–32131. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302847200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Garofalo RS, Orena SJ, Radidi K, Torchia AJ, Stock JL, Hildebrandt AL, Coskran T, Black SC, Brees DJ, Wicks JR, McNeish JD, Coleman KG. Severe diabetes, age-dependent loss of adipose tissue, and mild growth deficiency in mice lacking Akt2/PKB. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:197–208. doi: 10.1172/JCI16885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Tschopp O, Yang Z, Brodbeck D, Dummler BA, Hemings-Mieszczak M, Watanabe T, Michaelis T, Frahm J, Hemmings BA. Essential role of protein kinase B gamma (PKB gamma/Akt3) in postnatal brain development but not in glucose homeostasis. Development. 2005;132:2943–2954. doi: 10.1242/dev.01864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Easton RM, Cho H, Roovers K, Shineman DW, Mizrahi M, Forman MS, Lee VMY, Szabolcs M, de Jong R, Lotersdorf T, Ludwig T, Efstratiadis A, Birnbaum MJ. Role for Akt3/protein kinase B gamma in attainment of normal brain size. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:1869–1878. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.5.1869-1878.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Swedish Expert Group. Report on Mercury. Nord Hyg Tidskr. 1971;4:1–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Philbert MA, Billingsley ML, Reuhl KR. Mechanisms of injury in the central nervous system. Toxicol Pathol. 2000;28:43–53. doi: 10.1177/019262330002800107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Costa LG, Aschner M, Vitalone A, Syversen T, Soldin OP. Developmental neuropathology of environmental agents. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004;44:87–110. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.44.101802.121424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Mergler D, Anderson HA, Chan LH, Mahaffey KR, Murray M, Sakamoto M, Stern AH. The panel on health risks and toxicological effects of methylmercury. Methylmercury exposure and health effects in humans: a worldwide concern. Ambio. 2007;36:3–11. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[3:meahei]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES