Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1995 Apr 18;14(8):1752–1765. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07164.x

Constraints on transcriptional activator function contribute to transcriptional quiescence during early Xenopus embryogenesis.

G Almouzni 1, A P Wolffe 1
PMCID: PMC398268  PMID: 7737126

Abstract

We have examined the cause of transcriptional quiescence prior to the mid-blastula transition (MBT) in Xenopus laevis. We have found distinct requirements for transcription of class II and class III genes. An artificial increase of the amount of DNA present within the embryo over that found at the MBT allows precocious transcription of tRNA genes, but not of the adenovirus E4 or human cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoters. Thus titration of an inhibitor by exogenous DNA determines class III but not class II gene activation. We demonstrate that the action of the inhibitor depends on the association of core histones with DNA. The addition of exogenous TBP, together with an increase in the amount of DNA within the embryo, allows significant basal transcription of class II genes prior to the MBT, whereas it does not increase transcription of tRNA genes. To examine the activation of transcription above basal levels, we used a defined minimal promoter containing five Gal4 binding sites and the activator Gal4-VP16. Precocious transcriptional activation is directed by Gal4-VP16 prior to the MBT, demonstrating that a functional transcriptional machinery exists at this early developmental stage. Furthermore, since this activation can occur in the absence of exogenous TBP or chromatin titration, a transcription factor that can penetrate chromatin is sufficient for recruitment of this machinery to a promoter. Our results support the hypothesis that the temporal regulation of transcription during early embryogenesis in Xenopus reflects not only a titration of inhibitors by DNA, but also a deficiency in the activity of transcriptional activators prior to the MBT.

Full text

PDF
1752

Images in this article

1754Image
on p.1754
1756Image
on p.1756
1756Image
on p.1756
1757Image
on p.1757
1759Image
on p.1759
1760Image
on p.1760
1761Image
on p.1761

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adamson E. D., Woodland H. R. Changes in the rate of histone synthesis during oocyte maturation and very early development of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1977 May;57(1):136–149. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90360-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamson E. D., Woodland H. R. Histone synthesis in early amphibian development: histone and DNA syntheses are not co-ordinated. J Mol Biol. 1974 Sep 15;88(2):263–285. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90481-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Almouzni G., Méchali M., Wolffe A. P. Competition between transcription complex assembly and chromatin assembly on replicating DNA. EMBO J. 1990 Feb;9(2):573–582. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08145.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Almouzni G., Méchali M., Wolffe A. P. Transcription complex disruption caused by a transition in chromatin structure. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):655–665. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Almouzni G., Wolffe A. P. Nuclear assembly, structure, and function: the use of Xenopus in vitro systems. Exp Cell Res. 1993 Mar;205(1):1–15. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Almouzni G., Wolffe A. P. Replication-coupled chromatin assembly is required for the repression of basal transcription in vivo. Genes Dev. 1993 Oct;7(10):2033–2047. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.10.2033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Archer T. K., Lefebvre P., Wolford R. G., Hager G. L. Transcription factor loading on the MMTV promoter: a bimodal mechanism for promoter activation. Science. 1992 Mar 20;255(5051):1573–1576. doi: 10.1126/science.1347958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bendig M. M. Persistence and expression of histone genes injected into Xenopus eggs in early development. Nature. 1981 Jul 2;292(5818):65–67. doi: 10.1038/292065a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bendig M. M., Williams J. G. Differential expression of the Xenopus laevis tadpole and adult beta-globin genes when injected into fertilized Xenopus laevis eggs. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;4(3):567–570. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.3.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blow J. J., Laskey R. A. Initiation of DNA replication in nuclei and purified DNA by a cell-free extract of Xenopus eggs. Cell. 1986 Nov 21;47(4):577–587. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90622-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boshart M., Weber F., Jahn G., Dorsch-Häsler K., Fleckenstein B., Schaffner W. A very strong enhancer is located upstream of an immediate early gene of human cytomegalovirus. Cell. 1985 Jun;41(2):521–530. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80025-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bouvet P., Dimitrov S., Wolffe A. P. Specific regulation of Xenopus chromosomal 5S rRNA gene transcription in vivo by histone H1. Genes Dev. 1994 May 15;8(10):1147–1159. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.10.1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown D. D., Gurdon J. B. High-fidelity transcription of 5S DNA injected into Xenopus oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 May;74(5):2064–2068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.5.2064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown D. D., Littna E. Synthesis and accumulation of low molecular weight RNA during embryogenesis of Xenopus laevis. J Mol Biol. 1966 Sep;20(1):95–112. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(66)90120-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Carey M., Leatherwood J., Ptashne M. A potent GAL4 derivative activates transcription at a distance in vitro. Science. 1990 Feb 9;247(4943):710–712. doi: 10.1126/science.2405489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chasman D. I., Leatherwood J., Carey M., Ptashne M., Kornberg R. D. Activation of yeast polymerase II transcription by herpesvirus VP16 and GAL4 derivatives in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;9(11):4746–4749. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.4746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Clark D. J., Wolffe A. P. Superhelical stress and nucleosome-mediated repression of 5S RNA gene transcription in vitro. EMBO J. 1991 Nov;10(11):3419–3428. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04906.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Clarkson S. G., Kurer V., Smith H. O. Sequence organization of a cloned tDNA met fragment from Xenopus laevis. Cell. 1978 Jul;14(3):713–724. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90253-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Croston G. E., Kerrigan L. A., Lira L. M., Marshak D. R., Kadonaga J. T. Sequence-specific antirepression of histone H1-mediated inhibition of basal RNA polymerase II transcription. Science. 1991 Feb 8;251(4994):643–649. doi: 10.1126/science.1899487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dasso M., Newport J. W. Completion of DNA replication is monitored by a feedback system that controls the initiation of mitosis in vitro: studies in Xenopus. Cell. 1990 Jun 1;61(5):811–823. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90191-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dimitrov S., Almouzni G., Dasso M., Wolffe A. P. Chromatin transitions during early Xenopus embryogenesis: changes in histone H4 acetylation and in linker histone type. Dev Biol. 1993 Nov;160(1):214–227. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1993.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dimitrov S., Dasso M. C., Wolffe A. P. Remodeling sperm chromatin in Xenopus laevis egg extracts: the role of core histone phosphorylation and linker histone B4 in chromatin assembly. J Cell Biol. 1994 Aug;126(3):591–601. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.3.591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Edgar B. A., Kiehle C. P., Schubiger G. Cell cycle control by the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio in early Drosophila development. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):365–372. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90771-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Englander E. W., Wolffe A. P., Howard B. H. Nucleosome interactions with a human Alu element. Transcriptional repression and effects of template methylation. J Biol Chem. 1993 Sep 15;268(26):19565–19573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gargiulo G., Razvi F., Worcel A. Assembly of transcriptionally active chromatin in Xenopus oocytes requires specific DNA binding factors. Cell. 1984 Sep;38(2):511–521. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90506-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ge H., Roeder R. G. The high mobility group protein HMG1 can reversibly inhibit class II gene transcription by interaction with the TATA-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jun 24;269(25):17136–17140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ghazal P., Lubon H., Hennighausen L. Multiple sequence-specific transcription factors modulate cytomegalovirus enhancer activity in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Apr;8(4):1809–1811. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.4.1809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gill G., Ptashne M. Negative effect of the transcriptional activator GAL4. Nature. 1988 Aug 25;334(6184):721–724. doi: 10.1038/334721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Goodrich J. A., Hoey T., Thut C. J., Admon A., Tjian R. Drosophila TAFII40 interacts with both a VP16 activation domain and the basal transcription factor TFIIB. Cell. 1993 Nov 5;75(3):519–530. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90386-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Grunstein M. Histone function in transcription. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:643–678. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.003235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hansen J. C., Wolffe A. P. Influence of chromatin folding on transcription initiation and elongation by RNA polymerase III. Biochemistry. 1992 Sep 1;31(34):7977–7988. doi: 10.1021/bi00149a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Harland R. M., Laskey R. A. Regulated replication of DNA microinjected into eggs of Xenopus laevis. Cell. 1980 Oct;21(3):761–771. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90439-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Harland R. M., Weintraub H., McKnight S. L. Transcription of DNA injected into Xenopus oocytes is influenced by template topology. Nature. 1983 Mar 3;302(5903):38–43. doi: 10.1038/302038a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hartl P., Gottesfeld J., Forbes D. J. Mitotic repression of transcription in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;120(3):613–624. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.3.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hayes J. J., Pruss D., Wolffe A. P. Contacts of the globular domain of histone H5 and core histones with DNA in a "chromatosome". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 2;91(16):7817–7821. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hoey T., Dynlacht B. D., Peterson M. G., Pugh B. F., Tjian R. Isolation and characterization of the Drosophila gene encoding the TATA box binding protein, TFIID. Cell. 1990 Jun 29;61(7):1179–1186. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90682-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hori R., Carey M. The role of activators in assembly of RNA polymerase II transcription complexes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1994 Apr;4(2):236–244. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kassavetis G. A., Braun B. R., Nguyen L. H., Geiduschek E. P. S. cerevisiae TFIIIB is the transcription initiation factor proper of RNA polymerase III, while TFIIIA and TFIIIC are assembly factors. Cell. 1990 Jan 26;60(2):235–245. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90739-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kassavetis G. A., Joazeiro C. A., Pisano M., Geiduschek E. P., Colbert T., Hahn S., Blanco J. A. The role of the TATA-binding protein in the assembly and function of the multisubunit yeast RNA polymerase III transcription factor, TFIIIB. Cell. 1992 Dec 11;71(6):1055–1064. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90399-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kay B. K. Xenopus laevis: Practical uses in cell and molecular biology. Injections of oocytes and embryos. Methods Cell Biol. 1991;36:663–669. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kimelman D., Kirschner M., Scherson T. The events of the midblastula transition in Xenopus are regulated by changes in the cell cycle. Cell. 1987 Feb 13;48(3):399–407. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90191-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kleinschmidt J. A., Fortkamp E., Krohne G., Zentgraf H., Franke W. W. Co-existence of two different types of soluble histone complexes in nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes. J Biol Chem. 1985 Jan 25;260(2):1166–1176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Krieg P. A., Melton D. A. Developmental regulation of a gastrula-specific gene injected into fertilized Xenopus eggs. EMBO J. 1985 Dec 16;4(13A):3463–3471. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04105.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. LaMarca M. J., Fidler M. C., Smith L. D., Keem K. Hormonal effects on RNA synthesis by stage 6 oocytes of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1975 Dec;47(2):384–393. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(75)90292-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Laskey R. A., Harland R. M., Méchali M. Induction of chromosome replication during maturation of amphibian oocytes. Ciba Found Symp. 1983;98:25–43. doi: 10.1002/9780470720790.ch3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Laybourn P. J., Kadonaga J. T. Role of nucleosomal cores and histone H1 in regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Science. 1991 Oct 11;254(5029):238–245. doi: 10.1126/science.254.5029.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lee H. L., Archer T. K. Nucleosome-mediated disruption of transcription factor-chromatin initiation complexes at the mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;14(1):32–41. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.1.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lin Y. S., Carey M. F., Ptashne M., Green M. R. GAL4 derivatives function alone and synergistically with mammalian activators in vitro. Cell. 1988 Aug 26;54(5):659–664. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)80010-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lin Y. S., Green M. R. Mechanism of action of an acidic transcriptional activator in vitro. Cell. 1991 Mar 8;64(5):971–981. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90321-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lund E., Dahlberg J. E. Control of 4-8S RNA transcription at the midblastula transition in Xenopus laevis embryos. Genes Dev. 1992 Jun;6(6):1097–1106. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.6.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Majumder S., Miranda M., DePamphilis M. L. Analysis of gene expression in mouse preimplantation embryos demonstrates that the primary role of enhancers is to relieve repression of promoters. EMBO J. 1993 Mar;12(3):1131–1140. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05754.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Meisterernst M., Horikoshi M., Roeder R. G. Recombinant yeast TFIID, a general transcription factor, mediates activation by the gene-specific factor USF in a chromatin assembly assay. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(23):9153–9157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.23.9153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Miller T. J., Mertz J. E. Template structural requirements for transcription in vivo by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Dec;2(12):1595–1607. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.12.1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Nakakura N., Miura T., Yamana K., Ito A., Shiokawa K. Synthesis of heterogeneous mRNA-like RNA and low-molecular-weight RNA before the midblastula transition in embryos of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1987 Oct;123(2):421–429. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90400-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Newport J., Kirschner M. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell. 1982 Oct;30(3):675–686. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90272-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Newport J., Kirschner M. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: II. Control of the onset of transcription. Cell. 1982 Oct;30(3):687–696. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90273-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Philpott A., Leno G. H., Laskey R. A. Sperm decondensation in Xenopus egg cytoplasm is mediated by nucleoplasmin. Cell. 1991 May 17;65(4):569–578. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90089-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Prioleau M. N., Huet J., Sentenac A., Méchali M. Competition between chromatin and transcription complex assembly regulates gene expression during early development. Cell. 1994 May 6;77(3):439–449. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90158-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ranjan M., Tafuri S. R., Wolffe A. P. Masking mRNA from translation in somatic cells. Genes Dev. 1993 Sep;7(9):1725–1736. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.9.1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rupp R. A., Weintraub H. Ubiquitous MyoD transcription at the midblastula transition precedes induction-dependent MyoD expression in presumptive mesoderm of X. laevis. Cell. 1991 Jun 14;65(6):927–937. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90545-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ryoji M., Worcel A. Chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes: in vivo studies. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):21–32. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90297-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sadowski I., Ma J., Triezenberg S., Ptashne M. GAL4-VP16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activator. Nature. 1988 Oct 6;335(6190):563–564. doi: 10.1038/335563a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Schmidt E. V., Christoph G., Zeller R., Leder P. The cytomegalovirus enhancer: a pan-active control element in transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Aug;10(8):4406–4411. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.8.4406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Schultz R. M. Regulation of zygotic gene activation in the mouse. Bioessays. 1993 Aug;15(8):531–538. doi: 10.1002/bies.950150806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Smythe C., Newport J. W. Coupling of mitosis to the completion of S phase in Xenopus occurs via modulation of the tyrosine kinase that phosphorylates p34cdc2. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):787–797. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90153-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Solomon M. J., Glotzer M., Lee T. H., Philippe M., Kirschner M. W. Cyclin activation of p34cdc2. Cell. 1990 Nov 30;63(5):1013–1024. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90504-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Stringer K. F., Ingles C. J., Greenblatt J. Direct and selective binding of an acidic transcriptional activation domain to the TATA-box factor TFIID. Nature. 1990 Jun 28;345(6278):783–786. doi: 10.1038/345783a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Taylor I. C., Workman J. L., Schuetz T. J., Kingston R. E. Facilitated binding of GAL4 and heat shock factor to nucleosomal templates: differential function of DNA-binding domains. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1285–1298. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Toyoda T., Wolffe A. P. Characterization of RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription in Xenopus extracts. Dev Biol. 1992 Sep;153(1):150–157. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90099-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Weisbrod S., Wickens M. P., Whytock S., Gurdon J. B. Active chromatin of oocytes injected with somatic cell nuclei or cloned DNA. Dev Biol. 1982 Nov;94(1):216–229. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90085-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. White J., Brou C., Wu J., Lutz Y., Moncollin V., Chambon P. The acidic transcriptional activator GAL-VP16 acts on preformed template-committed complexes. EMBO J. 1992 Jun;11(6):2229–2240. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05282.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. White R. J., Jackson S. P. The TATA-binding protein: a central role in transcription by RNA polymerases I, II and III. Trends Genet. 1992 Aug;8(8):284–288. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90255-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wolffe A. P., Brown D. D. DNA replication in vitro erases a Xenopus 5S RNA gene transcription complex. Cell. 1986 Oct 24;47(2):217–227. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90444-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Wolffe A. P., Jordan E., Brown D. D. A bacteriophage RNA polymerase transcribes through a Xenopus 5S RNA gene transcription complex without disrupting it. Cell. 1986 Feb 14;44(3):381–389. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90459-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Woodland H. R., Adamson E. D. The synthesis and storage of histones during the oogenesis of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1977 May;57(1):118–135. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90359-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Workman J. L., Abmayr S. M., Cromlish W. A., Roeder R. G. Transcriptional regulation by the immediate early protein of pseudorabies virus during in vitro nucleosome assembly. Cell. 1988 Oct 21;55(2):211–219. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90044-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Workman J. L., Kingston R. E. Nucleosome core displacement in vitro via a metastable transcription factor-nucleosome complex. Science. 1992 Dec 11;258(5089):1780–1784. doi: 10.1126/science.1465613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Workman J. L., Roeder R. G., Kingston R. E. An upstream transcription factor, USF (MLTF), facilitates the formation of preinitiation complexes during in vitro chromatin assembly. EMBO J. 1990 Apr;9(4):1299–1308. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08239.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wormington W. M., Brown D. D. Onset of 5 S RNA gene regulation during Xenopus embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 1983 Sep;99(1):248–257. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90273-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Yasuda G. K., Schubiger G. Temporal regulation in the early embryo: is MBT too good to be true? Trends Genet. 1992 Apr;8(4):124–127. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90369-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES