Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1995 Apr 18;14(8):1766–1772. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07165.x

The E12 inhibitory domain prevents homodimer formation and facilitates selective heterodimerization with the MyoD family of gene regulatory factors.

M Shirakata 1, B M Paterson 1
PMCID: PMC398270  PMID: 7737127

Abstract

Although the ubiquitous helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein E12 does not homodimerize efficiently, the myogenic factor MyoD forms an avid DNA-binding heterodimer with E12 through the conserved HLH dimerization domain. However, the mechanism which ensures this selective dimerization is not understood at present. In our functional studies of various amino acid changes in the E12 HLH domain, we found that a single substitution in E12 helix 1 can abolish the effect of the E12 inhibitory domain and results in the efficient DNA binding of the E12 homodimer. Competition experiments revealed that the inhibitory domain, in fact, blocks the dimerization of E12 rather than DNA binding. MyoD contains two glutamic residues in helix 2 that are required for efficient dimerization with E12. More importantly, these residues were not essential for dimerization with E12 mutants in which the dimerization inhibitory domain had been relaxed, or for dimerization with E47 which does not contain the inhibitory domain owing to the use of an alternative exon. The positions of these glutamic residues are conserved among the four myogenic factors. Thus, members of the MyoD family of gene regulatory proteins can overcome the E12 dimerization inhibitory domain through a mechanism involving, in part, the negatively charged amino acid residues in helix 2. This result describes a novel mechanism facilitating the selective formation of the MyoD(MRF)-E12 heterodimer that enhances dimerization specificity and may apply to other members of the E-protein family.

Full text

PDF
1766

Images in this article

1767Image
on p.1767
1768Image
on p.1768
1768Image
on p.1768
1768Image
on p.1768
1769Image
on p.1769
1770Image
on p.1770

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amati B., Brooks M. W., Levy N., Littlewood T. D., Evan G. I., Land H. Oncogenic activity of the c-Myc protein requires dimerization with Max. Cell. 1993 Jan 29;72(2):233–245. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90663-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benezra R., Davis R. L., Lockshon D., Turner D. L., Weintraub H. The protein Id: a negative regulator of helix-loop-helix DNA binding proteins. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90214-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berberich S. J., Cole M. D. Casein kinase II inhibits the DNA-binding activity of Max homodimers but not Myc/Max heterodimers. Genes Dev. 1992 Feb;6(2):166–176. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.2.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackwell T. K., Weintraub H. Differences and similarities in DNA-binding preferences of MyoD and E2A protein complexes revealed by binding site selection. Science. 1990 Nov 23;250(4984):1104–1110. doi: 10.1126/science.2174572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Braun T., Buschhausen-Denker G., Bober E., Tannich E., Arnold H. H. A novel human muscle factor related to but distinct from MyoD1 induces myogenic conversion in 10T1/2 fibroblasts. EMBO J. 1989 Mar;8(3):701–709. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03429.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buckingham M. Making muscle in mammals. Trends Genet. 1992 Apr;8(4):144–148. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90373-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Caudy M., Vässin H., Brand M., Tuma R., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. daughterless, a Drosophila gene essential for both neurogenesis and sex determination, has sequence similarities to myc and the achaete-scute complex. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):1061–1067. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90250-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis R. L., Cheng P. F., Lassar A. B., Weintraub H. The MyoD DNA binding domain contains a recognition code for muscle-specific gene activation. Cell. 1990 Mar 9;60(5):733–746. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90088-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis R. L., Weintraub H. Acquisition of myogenic specificity by replacement of three amino acid residues from MyoD into E12. Science. 1992 May 15;256(5059):1027–1030. doi: 10.1126/science.1317057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edmondson D. G., Olson E. N. A gene with homology to the myc similarity region of MyoD1 is expressed during myogenesis and is sufficient to activate the muscle differentiation program. Genes Dev. 1989 May;3(5):628–640. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.5.628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellenberger T. E., Brandl C. J., Struhl K., Harrison S. C. The GCN4 basic region leucine zipper binds DNA as a dimer of uninterrupted alpha helices: crystal structure of the protein-DNA complex. Cell. 1992 Dec 24;71(7):1223–1237. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80070-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellenberger T., Fass D., Arnaud M., Harrison S. C. Crystal structure of transcription factor E47: E-box recognition by a basic region helix-loop-helix dimer. Genes Dev. 1994 Apr 15;8(8):970–980. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.8.970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferré-D'Amaré A. R., Pognonec P., Roeder R. G., Burley S. K. Structure and function of the b/HLH/Z domain of USF. EMBO J. 1994 Jan 1;13(1):180–189. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06247.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferré-D'Amaré A. R., Prendergast G. C., Ziff E. B., Burley S. K. Recognition by Max of its cognate DNA through a dimeric b/HLH/Z domain. Nature. 1993 May 6;363(6424):38–45. doi: 10.1038/363038a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Henthorn P., Kiledjian M., Kadesch T. Two distinct transcription factors that bind the immunoglobulin enhancer microE5/kappa 2 motif. Science. 1990 Jan 26;247(4941):467–470. doi: 10.1126/science.2105528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hu J. S., Olson E. N., Kingston R. E. HEB, a helix-loop-helix protein related to E2A and ITF2 that can modulate the DNA-binding ability of myogenic regulatory factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;12(3):1031–1042. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.3.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson J. E., Birren S. J., Saito T., Anderson D. J. DNA binding and transcriptional regulatory activity of mammalian achaete-scute homologous (MASH) proteins revealed by interaction with a muscle-specific enhancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 15;89(8):3596–3600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.8.3596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Klein E. S., Simmons D. M., Swanson L. W., Rosenfeld M. G. Tissue-specific RNA splicing generates an ankyrin-like domain that affects the dimerization and DNA-binding properties of a bHLH protein. Genes Dev. 1993 Jan;7(1):55–71. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.1.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lassar A. B., Davis R. L., Wright W. E., Kadesch T., Murre C., Voronova A., Baltimore D., Weintraub H. Functional activity of myogenic HLH proteins requires hetero-oligomerization with E12/E47-like proteins in vivo. Cell. 1991 Jul 26;66(2):305–315. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90620-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lin Z. Y., Dechesne C. A., Eldridge J., Paterson B. M. An avian muscle factor related to MyoD1 activates muscle-specific promoters in nonmuscle cells of different germ-layer origin and in BrdU-treated myoblasts. Genes Dev. 1989 Jul;3(7):986–996. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.7.986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ma P. C., Rould M. A., Weintraub H., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of MyoD bHLH domain-DNA complex: perspectives on DNA recognition and implications for transcriptional activation. Cell. 1994 May 6;77(3):451–459. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Michelson A. M., Abmayr S. M., Bate M., Arias A. M., Maniatis T. Expression of a MyoD family member prefigures muscle pattern in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 1990 Dec;4(12A):2086–2097. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.12a.2086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Murre C., McCaw P. S., Baltimore D. A new DNA binding and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins. Cell. 1989 Mar 10;56(5):777–783. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90682-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. O'Neil K. T., Hoess R. H., DeGrado W. F. Design of DNA-binding peptides based on the leucine zipper motif. Science. 1990 Aug 17;249(4970):774–778. doi: 10.1126/science.2389143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. O'Shea E. K., Rutkowski R., Kim P. S. Mechanism of specificity in the Fos-Jun oncoprotein heterodimer. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):699–708. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90145-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Olson E. N., Klein W. H. bHLH factors in muscle development: dead lines and commitments, what to leave in and what to leave out. Genes Dev. 1994 Jan;8(1):1–8. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Paterson B. M., Walldorf U., Eldridge J., Dübendorfer A., Frasch M., Gehring W. J. The Drosophila homologue of vertebrate myogenic-determination genes encodes a transiently expressed nuclear protein marking primary myogenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 May 1;88(9):3782–3786. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.9.3782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rabindran S. K., Haroun R. I., Clos J., Wisniewski J., Wu C. Regulation of heat shock factor trimer formation: role of a conserved leucine zipper. Science. 1993 Jan 8;259(5092):230–234. doi: 10.1126/science.8421783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rhodes S. J., Konieczny S. F. Identification of MRF4: a new member of the muscle regulatory factor gene family. Genes Dev. 1989 Dec;3(12B):2050–2061. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.12b.2050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sassoon D. A. Myogenic regulatory factors: dissecting their role and regulation during vertebrate embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 1993 Mar;156(1):11–23. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1993.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shirakata M., Friedman F. K., Wei Q., Paterson B. M. Dimerization specificity of myogenic helix-loop-helix DNA-binding factors directed by nonconserved hydrophilic residues. Genes Dev. 1993 Dec;7(12A):2456–2470. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.12a.2456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shuman J. D., Vinson C. R., McKnight S. L. Evidence of changes in protease sensitivity and subunit exchange rate on DNA binding by C/EBP. Science. 1990 Aug 17;249(4970):771–774. doi: 10.1126/science.2202050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Smith T. H., Block N. E., Rhodes S. J., Konieczny S. F., Miller J. B. A unique pattern of expression of the four muscle regulatory factor proteins distinguishes somitic from embryonic, fetal and newborn mouse myogenic cells. Development. 1993 Mar;117(3):1125–1133. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.3.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sun X. H., Baltimore D. An inhibitory domain of E12 transcription factor prevents DNA binding in E12 homodimers but not in E12 heterodimers. Cell. 1991 Jan 25;64(2):459–470. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90653-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sun X. H., Baltimore D. Correction: an inhibitory domain of E12 transcription factor prevents DNA binding in E12 homodimers but not in E12 heterodimers. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):423–423. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sun X. H., Copeland N. G., Jenkins N. A., Baltimore D. Id proteins Id1 and Id2 selectively inhibit DNA binding by one class of helix-loop-helix proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;11(11):5603–5611. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.11.5603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vinson C. R., Hai T., Boyd S. M. Dimerization specificity of the leucine zipper-containing bZIP motif on DNA binding: prediction and rational design. Genes Dev. 1993 Jun;7(6):1047–1058. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.6.1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Voronova A., Baltimore D. Mutations that disrupt DNA binding and dimer formation in the E47 helix-loop-helix protein map to distinct domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4722–4726. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Weintraub H., Davis R., Tapscott S., Thayer M., Krause M., Benezra R., Blackwell T. K., Turner D., Rupp R., Hollenberg S. The myoD gene family: nodal point during specification of the muscle cell lineage. Science. 1991 Feb 15;251(4995):761–766. doi: 10.1126/science.1846704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Winter B., Braun T., Arnold H. H. Co-operativity of functional domains in the muscle-specific transcription factor Myf-5. EMBO J. 1992 May;11(5):1843–1855. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05236.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wright W. E., Sassoon D. A., Lin V. K. Myogenin, a factor regulating myogenesis, has a domain homologous to MyoD. Cell. 1989 Feb 24;56(4):607–617. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90583-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES