Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Mar 19;93(6):2517–2522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.6.2517

The translational function of nucleotide C1054 in the small subunit rRNA is conserved throughout evolution: genetic evidence in yeast.

Y O Chernoff 1, G P Newnam 1, S W Liebman 1
PMCID: PMC39829  PMID: 8637906

Abstract

Mutations at position C1054 of 16S rRNA have previously been shown to cause translational suppression in Escherichia coli. To examine the effects of similar mutations in a eukaryote, all three possible base substitutions and a base deletion were generated at the position of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 18S rRNA corresponding to E. coli C1054. In yeast, as in E. coli, both C1054A (rdn-1A) and C1054G (rdn-1G) caused dominant nonsense suppression. Yeast C1054U (rdn-1T) was a recessive antisuppressor, while yeast C1054-delta (rdn-1delta) led to recessive lethality. Both C1054U and two previously described yeast 18S rRNA antisuppressor mutations, G517A (rdn-2) and U912C (rdn-4), inhibited codon-nonspecific suppression caused by mutations in eukaryotic release factors, sup45 and sup35. However, among these only C1054U inhibited UAA-specific suppressions caused by a UAA-decoding mutant tRNA-Gln (SLT3). Our data implicate eukaryotic C1054 in translational termination, thus suggesting that its function is conserved throughout evolution despite the divergence of nearby nucleotide sequences.

Full text

PDF
2517

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown C. M., McCaughan K. K., Tate W. P. Two regions of the Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA are important for decoding stop signals in polypeptide chain termination. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 May 11;21(9):2109–2115. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.9.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chernoff Y. O., Vincent A., Liebman S. W. Mutations in eukaryotic 18S ribosomal RNA affect translational fidelity and resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics. EMBO J. 1994 Feb 15;13(4):906–913. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06334.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Craigen W. J., Caskey C. T. Expression of peptide chain release factor 2 requires high-efficiency frameshift. Nature. 1986 Jul 17;322(6076):273–275. doi: 10.1038/322273a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dontsova O., Dokudovskaya S., Kopylov A., Bogdanov A., Rinke-Appel J., Jünke N., Brimacombe R. Three widely separated positions in the 16S RNA lie in or close to the ribosomal decoding region; a site-directed cross-linking study with mRNA analogues. EMBO J. 1992 Aug;11(8):3105–3116. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05383.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frolova L., Le Goff X., Rasmussen H. H., Cheperegin S., Drugeon G., Kress M., Arman I., Haenni A. L., Celis J. E., Philippe M. A highly conserved eukaryotic protein family possessing properties of polypeptide chain release factor. Nature. 1994 Dec 15;372(6507):701–703. doi: 10.1038/372701a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hänfler A., Kleuvers B., Göringer H. U. The involvement of base 1054 in 16S rRNA for UGA stop codon dependent translational termination. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Oct 11;18(19):5625–5632. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.19.5625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Inge-Vechtomov S. G., Tikhodeev O. N., Karpova T. S. Selektivnye sistemy dlia polucheniia retsessivnykh ribosomnykh supressorov u drozhzhei sakharomitsetov. Genetika. 1988 Jul;24(7):1159–1165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kulkens T., van der Sande C. A., Dekker A. F., van Heerikhuizen H., Planta R. J. A system to study transcription by yeast RNA polymerase I within the chromosomal context: functional analysis of the ribosomal DNA enhancer and the RBP1/REB1 binding sites. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(12):4665–4674. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05568.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kunkel T. A., Roberts J. D., Zakour R. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 1987;154:367–382. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)54085-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leclerc D., Melançon P., Brakier-Gingras L. The interaction between streptomycin and ribosomal RNA. Biochimie. 1991 Dec;73(12):1431–1438. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(91)90175-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McCarthy J. E., Brimacombe R. Prokaryotic translation: the interactive pathway leading to initiation. Trends Genet. 1994 Nov;10(11):402–407. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90057-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moffat J. G., Timms K. M., Trotman C. N., Tate W. P. Interaction of the release factors with the Escherichia coli ribosome: structurally and functionally-important domains. Biochimie. 1991 Jul-Aug;73(7-8):1113–1120. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(91)90154-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moine H., Dahlberg A. E. Mutations in helix 34 of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA have multiple effects on ribosome function and synthesis. J Mol Biol. 1994 Oct 28;243(3):402–412. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murgola E. J., Hijazi K. A., Göringer H. U., Dahlberg A. E. Mutant 16S ribosomal RNA: a codon-specific translational suppressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jun;85(12):4162–4165. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Musters W., Venema J., van der Linden G., van Heerikhuizen H., Klootwijk J., Planta R. J. A system for the analysis of yeast ribosomal DNA mutations. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Feb;9(2):551–559. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.2.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Neefs J. M., Van de Peer Y., De Rijk P., Goris A., De Wachter R. Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Apr 25;19 (Suppl):1987–2015. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.suppl.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Neefs J. M., Van de Peer Y., Hendriks L., De Wachter R. Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Apr 25;18 (Suppl):2237–2317. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.suppl.2237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Noller H. F., Hoffarth V., Zimniak L. Unusual resistance of peptidyl transferase to protein extraction procedures. Science. 1992 Jun 5;256(5062):1416–1419. doi: 10.1126/science.1604315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Noller H. F. Ribosomal RNA and translation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1991;60:191–227. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.001203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Noller H. F. tRNA-rRNA interactions and peptidyl transferase. FASEB J. 1993 Jan;7(1):87–89. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.7.1.8422979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. O'Connor M., Göringer H. U., Dahlberg A. E. A ribosomal ambiguity mutation in the 530 loop of E. coli 16S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Aug 25;20(16):4221–4227. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.16.4221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pel H. J., Maat C., Rep M., Grivell L. A. The yeast nuclear gene MRF1 encodes a mitochondrial peptide chain release factor and cures several mitochondrial RNA splicing defects. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Dec 11;20(23):6339–6346. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.23.6339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Powers T., Noller H. F. Evidence for functional interaction between elongation factor Tu and 16S ribosomal RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 15;90(4):1364–1368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Prescott C. D., Kleuvers B., Göringer H. U. A rRNA-mRNA base pairing model for UGA-dependent termination. Biochimie. 1991 Jul-Aug;73(7-8):1121–1129. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(91)90155-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Prescott C. D., Kornau H. C. Mutations in E.coli 16s rRNA that enhance and decrease the activity of a suppressor tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Apr 11;20(7):1567–1571. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.7.1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Prescott C., Krabben L., Nierhaus K. Ribosomes containing the C1054-deletion mutation in E. coli 16S rRNA act as suppressors at all three nonsense codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Oct 11;19(19):5281–5283. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.19.5281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shen Z. H., Fox T. D. Substitution of an invariant nucleotide at the base of the highly conserved '530-loop' of 15S rRNA causes suppression of yeast mitochondrial ochre mutations. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Jun 26;17(12):4535–4539. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.12.4535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sizonenko G. I., Chernov Iu O., Kulikov V. N., Karpova T. S., Kashkin P. K., Pavlov Iu I., Bekhtereva T. A., Sakharova E. V., Tikhodeev O. N., Inge-Vechtomov S. G. Novyi klass okhr-supressorov u drozhzhei-sakharomitsetov: mutatsii v gene glutaminovoi tRNK. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR. 1990;310(6):1480–1484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stansfield I., Jones K. M., Kushnirov V. V., Dagkesamanskaya A. R., Poznyakovski A. I., Paushkin S. V., Nierras C. R., Cox B. S., Ter-Avanesyan M. D., Tuite M. F. The products of the SUP45 (eRF1) and SUP35 genes interact to mediate translation termination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1995 Sep 1;14(17):4365–4373. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00111.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhouravleva G., Frolova L., Le Goff X., Le Guellec R., Inge-Vechtomov S., Kisselev L., Philippe M. Termination of translation in eukaryotes is governed by two interacting polypeptide chain release factors, eRF1 and eRF3. EMBO J. 1995 Aug 15;14(16):4065–4072. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00078.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES