Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2014 Mar 10;192(8):3626–3636. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302062

Metabolic Reprogramming is Required for Antibody Production That is Suppressed in Anergic but Exaggerated in Chronically BAFF-Exposed B cells

Alfredo Caro-Maldonado *,†,, Ruoning Wang §, Amanda G Nichols *,†,, Masayuki Kuraoka , Sandra Milasta #, Lillian D Sun *,†,, Amanda L Gavin , E Dale Abel , Garnett Kelsoe , Douglas R Green #, Jeffrey C Rathmell *,†,
PMCID: PMC3984038  NIHMSID: NIHMS569837  PMID: 24616478

Summary

B cell activation leads to proliferation and antibody production that can protect from pathogens or promote autoimmunity. Regulation of cell metabolism is essential to support the demands of lymphocyte growth and effector function and may regulate tolerance. Here, we tested the regulation and role of glucose uptake and metabolism in the proliferation and antibody production of control, anergic, and autoimmune-prone B cells. Control B cells had a balanced increase in lactate production and oxygen consumption following activation, with proportionally increased glucose transporter Glut1 expression and mitochondrial mass upon either LPS or BCR stimulation. This contrasted with metabolic reprogramming of T cells, which had lower glycolytic flux when resting but disproportionately increased this pathway upon activation. Importantly, tolerance greatly affected B cell metabolic reprogramming. Anergic B cells remained metabolically quiescent, with only a modest increase in glycolysis and oxygen consumption with LPS stimulation. B cells chronically stimulated with elevated B cell Activating Factor (BAFF), however, rapidly increased glycolysis and antibody production upon stimulation. Induction of glycolysis was critical for antibody production, as glycolytic inhibition with the pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDHK) inhibitor dichloroacetate (DCA) sharply suppressed B cell proliferation and antibody secretion in vitro and in vivo. Further, B cell-specific deletion of Glut1 led to reduced B cell numbers and impaired antibody production in vivo. Together, these data show that activated B cells require Glut1-dependent metabolic reprogramming to support proliferation and antibody production that is distinct from T cells and that this glycolytic reprogramming is regulated in tolerance.

Keywords: B cells, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Cytokines, Glut1, metabolism

Introduction

Proper regulation of lymphocyte function is critical to allow normal immune responses while preventing autoimmunity or immunodeficiency. Lymphocyte metabolism is now appreciated to play a key role in cellular function and homeostasis (1). In T lymphocytes activation through the TCR along with CD28-mediated co-stimulation leads to a rapid increase in expression of the glucose transporter, Glut1, to support increased glucose uptake and metabolism (2, 3). Simultaneously, glutamine oxidation increases and beta-oxidation of fatty acids decreases (4, 5). Overall, glycolysis becomes predominant over oxidative metabolism in activated T cells, leading to a reliance on aerobic glycolysis and glutaminolysis in a metabolic phenotype that resembles that of cancer cells (4, 6). Stimulated dendritic cells and inflammatory macrophages induced similar metabolic programs (7, 8). Metabolic reprogramming in T cells is mediated through the induction of cMyc (5), a well-described regulator of glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and cell growth, together with the phosphatidyl-inositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway (2). As in T cells, the PI3K/Akt pathway can increase B cell expression of Glut1 and metabolism upon antigenic stimulation (9, 10). There can be significant metabolic heterogeneity in distinct lymphocyte subsets (11) and it is now of significant interest to establish mechanisms of metabolic reprogramming to better understand lymphocyte physiology and identify metabolic targets that could be exploited to treat disease. However, the metabolic phenotype of stimulated B cells and the requirements for antibody production are poorly understood.

Metabolic reprogramming to induce glycolysis may dictate the inflammatory potential of activated lymphocytes. Glucose deprivation (3, 12, 13), or treatment with the glycolytic inhibitor, 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) (5, 14, 15), suppresses T cell activation, proliferation, and production of IFNγ. In contrast, increased glucose uptake can enhance T cell function. Transgenic expression of Glut1 increased glucose uptake and metabolism in T cells, led to a larger basal cell size and hyperactivation of transgenic T cells with elevated IL2 and IFNγ production, and more rapid proliferation when stimulated (3). Over time, T cell specific Glut1 transgenic animals developed lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly, with hyper-gamma globulinemia and glomerular immune complex deposition at one year of age (3, 16), demonstrating increased glucose metabolism can enhance lymphocyte function.

Metabolic reprogramming to support lymphocyte activation, however, is not uniform and distinct stimuli promote metabolic pathways to match the needs of specific cell functions. Depending on the cytokine environment, activated CD4 T cells differentiate into inflammatory effectors, such as Th1 and Th17 cells, or immunologic suppressors, Treg (17). Th1 and Th17 CD4 T cells express high levels of Glut1 and depend on glycolytic flux (16, 18, 19). Treg, however, have lower levels of Glut1 expression and instead rely on mitochondrial metabolism and lipid oxidation (16, 19). Macrophage M1 and M2 subsets follow a similar pattern; with inflammatory M1 macrophages being predominantly glycolytic while anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages utilize lipid oxidation (7, 20). Metabolic reprogramming of activated effector T cells to favor glycolysis and lactate production is then reversed back to an oxidative phenotype at the conclusion of an immune response, with memory CD8 lymphocytes decreasing glycolysis and instead relying on lipid oxidation (21, 22). Similar to the reduced glycolysis of anergic (23) or memory T cells (22), B cell activation can fail to induce glycolysis if FcγRIIB is co-ligated (9). Tolerance inducing and immune suppressive mechanisms can, therefore, prevent or modify metabolic reprogramming.

B cell tolerance mechanisms are well defined, and include apoptosis, receptor editing, and the induction of anergy (24). However, these tolerance mechanisms can be prevented or overridden by chronic cytokine stimulation to promote autoimmunity, such as can occur in SLE. For example, increased levels of the cytokine B Cell Activating Factor (BAFF) are associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) (25, 26) and transgenic BAFF overexpression to chronically expose B cells to elevated levels of BAFF leads to a spontaneous SLE-like disease in mice (27, 28). Importantly, BAFF can activate the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (29) and promote glucose utilization in B cells (30). BAFF inhibition is a promising new biologic therapy in SLE (25), yet the impact of chronic BAFF exposure on B cell metabolism and roles of altered cellular metabolism in autoimmunity are uncertain.

Lymphocyte metabolism may provide a new opportunity to modulate immunity and inflammatory disease. Here we examine the regulation of B cell metabolism upon activation and the metabolic effects of anergy or chronic BAFF stimulation and autoimmunity. Surprisingly, we show that B cells are metabolically distinct from T cells, and do not switch to predominantly favor glycolysis but instead increase metabolism in a balanced fashion. Anergy and chronic BAFF overexposure led to broad and opposing changes in B cell metabolic capacity, with anergy suppressing and chronic BAFF overexposure enhancing cell metabolism. In particular, B cells from BAFF transgenic mice were primed to rapidly increase glycolysis upon stimulation. These changes were critical for B cell function, as inhibition of glycolysis or B cell-specific deletion of Glut1 suppressed antibody production in vivo. Therefore, B cells rely on Glut1 and targeting B cell metabolic regulation and glycolytic pathways may provide a new tool to prevent B cell proliferation and autoantibody production.

Materials and Methods

Mice

C57BL/6, RAG1−/−, Hif1αfl/fl, MD4 ML5, and CD19-Cre transgenic mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories. BAFF transgenic mice that express full length BAFF driven by the myeloid cell specific CD68 promoter (founder MB21) were generously provided by D. Nemazee (Scripps Research Institute) (31). Mycfl/fl mice (generously provided by F. Alt, Harvard) (32) were backcrossed six generations onto the C57BL/6 background. Both Mycfl/fl and Hif1αfl/fl were crossed with ROSA26CreERT2 (33). Glut1fl/fl mice (34) were crossed to CD19-Cre transgenics. The acute deletion of Myc or HIF1 was achieved through in vivo delivery of Tamoxifen (1mg/mouse, i.p) three days before B cell isolation. Some animals were treated with dichlroroacetate (DCA; 2g/L in drinking water changed twice each week). For bone marrow reconstitution, RAG1−/− mice were lethally irradiated with two doses of 4.5Gy, and provided wild type bone marrow by tail vein injection. Sex matched 7-12 week old mice were used throughout. Mice were housed and cared for at Duke University or St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital under Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved protocols. Human B cells were isolated from healthy donor peripheral blood (Gulf Coast Regional Blood Center).

Cell isolation and reagents

Splenic naïve B or T cells or human peripheral blood B cells were isolated by magnetic bead negative selection (purity was typically >90%; Miltenyi) and cultured in RPMI 1640 (Mediatech) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gemini Bio-Products), HEPES, and βME. B cells were stimulated with 10 μg/ml of LPS (Sigma-Aldrich), 20 μg/ml of F(ab’)2 anti-IgM (Jackson ImmunoResearch), or ODN (InvivoGen, Cat. tlrl-2006). T cells were treated in plates coated with 10 μg/ml of CD3 and CD28 (eBioscience). Unstimulated (UNS) B cells were maintained in 20ng/ml of BAFF (R&D Systems) to maintain in vitro viability. Some cultures were treated as indicated with 2-DG (0.5mM; Sigma), dichloroacetate (10mM DCA; VWR), or low dose rotenone (80nM; Seahorse Bioscience).

Flow cytometric analysis and antibodies

Cytometry analysis was performed with a MACSQuant® Analyzer (Miltenyi) and analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar). Anti-mouse CD19-APC, CD69-PE, IgM-FITC and IgD-Vioblue (eBioscience) or anti-human CD69-FITC (Miltenyi) were used to measure purity and B cell activation. Cells were incubated 30 minutes with 200nM of Mitotracker Green (Invitrogen), and washed to measure mitochondrial content. Proliferation was analyzed by CFSE staining and flow cytometric measurement of CFSE dilution. Glut1 expression was measured by intracellular flow cytometry of fixed cells using monoclonal anti-Glut1 (Abcam, Ab652) in the presence of rat serum and Fc Block, followed by anti-rabbit-PE before flow analysis.

Quantitative RT-PCR

RNA was harvested from purified B cells (RNeasy Plus; Qiagen) ex vivo or following stimulation with anti-IgM or LPS and reverse transcribed (iScript; Biorad) to perform SYBR Green-based (Biorad) quantitative RT-PCR of Glut1 (fw-AGCCCTGCTACAGTGTAT, rev-AGGTCTCGGGTCACATC) and cMyc (fw-CTGTTTGAAGGCTGGATTTCCT, rev-CAGCACCGACAGACGCC). Results were normalized to Beta-2-Microglobulin (fw: GAG AAT GGG AAG CCG AAC ATA, rev: GCTGAAGGACATATCTGACAT).

Western Blot

Cells were lysed in a low detergent buffer (1% Triton, 0.1% SDS) for one hour with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich). Nitrocellulose membranes were hybridized with anti-phospho S232-PDH-E1α (Millipore AP1063), total PDH-E1α antibodies (Abcam ab110334), Glut1 rabbit monoclonal (abcam, ab115730), Glut3 rabbit polyclonal (abcam, ab15311), actin (Cell Signaling, 4970S), cMyc (Cell Signaling, 179) or Hif1α (Cayman Chemicals 10006421).

Metabolic assays

Glucose uptake (35), glycolytic flux, hexokinase activity, fatty acid β-oxidation, glucose oxidation, glutamine oxidation, and pyruvate oxidation were measured as previously described (5). Briefly, glucose uptake was measured by incorporation of 2-deoxy-d-[3H]glucose. Glycolytic flux was determined by measuring the detritiation of [3-3H]-glucose. Glucose, glutamine, and pyruvate oxidation was measured by culture of cells in U-14C glucose, glutamine, and pyruvate respectively to measure production of 14CO2. 3H-palmitic acid was used to measure lipid oxidation by the production of 3H2O. Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) were measured with a XF24 extracellular flux analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience). Briefly, 1.4×106 unstimulated or 106 stimulated cells per well were seeded in a Cell-Tak (BD Biosciences) coated plate, and OCR and ECAR measurements were normalized to cell number. Cells were initially plated in XF Seahorse media with glutamine alone when glucose was injected in ECAR tests, or both glucose and glutamine in mitochondrial stress test using the following concentrations of injected compounds as indicated in the text: Oligomycin 1μM, Rotenone (0.75μM), electron transport chain accelerator FCCP (0.5μM), Antimycin A (1.5μM), 2-DG (20mM), glucose (10mM).

Immunizations and ELISAs

Some mice were immunized by intraperitoneal injection with 20μg of Ovalbumin coupled to 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl (OVA-NP) in alum. At various time points serum was collected and examined by ELISA for total and anti-(4-hydroxy-3-iodo-5-nitrophenyl) acetyl-bovine serum albumin (NIP-BSA) IgM and IgG (eBioscience) in a heterocritic antibody response for NP-reactive antibodies, as described (36). NIP5 and NIP25 indicate low and high levels of NIP coupling to BSA and reflect high affinity anti-NP and total anti-NP responses, respectively.

Results

B cell metabolic reprogramming upon activation

T cells transition from predominantly oxidative metabolism to aerobic glycolysis upon activation (11). B cells have also been shown to also increase glycolysis upon stimulation (9, 10, 30), although the regulation of this process is less characterized. To examine the metabolic regulation of B cells, metabolic parameters of isolated B cells were measured ex vivo or after six hours stimulation with LPS. At this time point, B cells have not entered the cell cycle (5) and metabolic changes are not due to potential secondary effects of proliferation. Extracellular flux analysis showed that six hours of LPS was sufficient to significantly increase B cell extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in response to glucose compared to that of B cells examined ex vivo (Fig. 1A, B). ECAR likely represents glycolytic flux to lactate production and was further increased to the maximal glycolytic capacity upon addition of the F1/F0 ATPase inhibitor, oligomycin, to suppress mitochondrial ATP production. This increase in lactate was dependent on glucose flux through glycolysis, as ECAR was sharply reduced by the glycolytic inhibitor 2-DG. Glycolytic flux was also measured directly using radiolabeled glucose in an assay that incorporates glucose uptake and glycolytic flux through enolase. In agreement with ECAR, 24 hours of LPS treatment significantly increased glycolytic rate (Fig. 1C). Glucose can also be oxidized through the pentose phosphate pathway or the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) and LPS stimulation led to a significant increase in glucose oxidation (Fig. 1D).

Figure 1. B cells undergo broad metabolic reprogramming upon activation.

Figure 1

A, B. Purified B cells were examined after 6 hours culture without stimulation (UNS) or with LPS, and Extracellular Acidification Rate (ECAR) was determined by extracellular flux analysis. (A) Representative plot of ECAR over time of B cells with addition of glucose (10 mM), oligomycin (1 μM), and 2-DG (20 mM) as indicated. (B) Basal glycolysis was determined after addition of glucose and glycolytic capacity was calculated after addition of oligomycin. C, D. Purified B cells were cultured 24 hours in BAFF (20 ng/ml) to maintain viability (unstimulated; UNS) or stimulated with LPS and (C) glycolytic rate and (D) glucose oxidation were directly calculated using radiolabeled glucose. E, F. Purified B cells were examined after 6 hours culture without stimulation (UNS) or with LPS, and Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR) was determined by extracellular flux analysis. (E) Representative plot of OCR over time with addition of oligomycin (1 μM), mitochondrial uncoupler FCCP (0.5μM), and electron transport inhibitors antimycin (1.5μM) + rotenone (0.75μM) as indicated. (F) Basal OCR was determined prior to addition of oligomycin and Maximal Respiratory Capacity was determined by subtracting non-mitochondrial OCR, calculated after antimycin and rotenone injection to maximal OCR upon FCCP uncoupling and maximal electron transport. G. The ratio of basal OCR/ECAR was determined in purified unstimulated and LPS treated B cells. Values from 24 hours stimulation are normalized to unstimulated cells. B-D, F-G show means from 3 or more independent experiments. Means and standard deviations are shown and statistical significance was determined by Student’s T test (* p≤0.05, ** p<0.005, N.S. not significant).

Oxidative phosphorylation can yield large amounts of ATP and is fueled by glucose, glutamine, or lipid metabolism. Like glycolysis, the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of B cells increased following B cell stimulation (Fig. 1E, F). Both basal OCR (Fig. 1F left panel) and maximal respiratory capacity (Fig. 1F right panel) were significantly elevated after 6 hours of LPS stimulation (Fig. 1E, F). Maximal respiratory capacity was measured by treating with oligomycin to block ATP production followed by the uncoupling agent, FCCP, to dissipate proton gradients and allow electron transport and oxygen consumption to operate at maximal rate. This elevated OCR was suppressed by the electron transport inhibitors antimycin A and rotenone, showing that respiration was mitochondrial (Fig. 1E). Similar findings were made using both lymph node and splenic B cells (Supplemental Fig. 1A).

One measurement that reflects the balance of metabolism as primarily oxidative or glycolytic is the ratio of OCR to ECAR. T cell activation leads to a shift in this ratio as cells transition from an oxidative to a predominantly glycolytic metabolism (22, 37). Cancer cells also transition to aerobic glycolysis and have a low ratio of OCR/ECAR (38). Surprisingly, the OCR/ECAR ratio was unchanged in B cells after stimulation with LPS (Fig. 1G). Thus, B cells are distinct and broadly increase both glycolytic and mitochondrial metabolic activity in a balanced fashion after LPS stimulation.

The metabolic phenotype of antigen-stimulated B and T cells was next tested to determine if B cells maintain balanced glycolytic and oxidative metabolism to this stimuli and compare to T cell activation. Purified B and T cell populations were examined ex vivo or antigen receptor stimulated for 24 hours and several key metabolic differences were observed. First, unstimulated B cells had similar oxygen consumption (OCR; Figure 2A), but significantly higher rates of glycolysis (ECAR; Figure 2B) than T cells. Second, while B cells increased both OCR and ECAR equivalently after activation, the extent of increase was lower than that observed in T cells. Lastly, antigen-stimulated B cells maintained a balanced OCR/ECAR ratio while activated T cells shifted to a glycolytic metabolism (Figure 2C). Thus B cell metabolism is reprogrammed after LPS or antigen receptor stimulation, but B cell metabolism differs from resting or stimulated T cells.

Figure 2. B cells and T cells are metabolically distinct.

Figure 2

A-C. Purified B cells and T cells were examined by extracellular flux analysis without stimulation (UNS) or after 24 hours stimulation with anti-IgM or anti-CD3+anti-CD28. (A) OCR, (B) ECAR and (C) OCR/ECAR were measured by extracellular flux analysis. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments. Means and standard deviations are shown and statistical significance was determined by Student’s T test (* p≤0.05, ** p<0.005, N.S. not significant). All experiments were repeated two or more times.

Glut1 and Mitochondrial Content

B cell metabolic reprogramming was balanced and involved proportionally increased expression of both glycolytic and mitochondrial components. One essential pathway to increase glycolysis and glucose metabolism is through increased glucose uptake. Indeed, stimulation of murine B cells through anti-IgM or LPS or human peripheral blood B cells with anti-IgM for 24 hours each significantly increased glucose transport when measured by uptake of radiolabeled glucose (Fig. 3A). Glucose uptake is mediated through a family of facilitative glucose transporters that are differentially expressed in cells of distinct lineages and differentiation states. Of these transporters, Glut1 is highly expressed in hematopoietic cells and B cell activation increased Glut1 mRNA (Fig. 3B) and protein (Fig. 3C). In addition, B cell activation led to a rapid overall increase in mitochondrial mass, as evidenced by increased staining with Mitotracker Green within six hours of stimulation (Fig. 3D). Even with distinct stimulatory signals through TLR4 or the BCR, therefore, B cells initiated similar metabolic reprogramming events that affect both glucose uptake and mitochondria.

Figure 3. B cell stimulation increases both Glut1 and mitochondrial mass.

Figure 3

A-C. Purified B cells were cultured without stimulation, with anti-IgM, or with LPS and (A) glucose uptake in purified mouse or human B cells (panel left and right respectively) was measured using radiolabeled glucose, (B) Glut1 mRNA in murine B cells was measured by quantitative rt-PCR, and (C) Glut1 protein levels in murine B cells were determined by intracellular flow cytometry. D. Purified murine B cells were cultured without stimulation or with LPS for 6 hours and stained with Mitotracker Green to measure mitochondrial mass by flow cytometry. Representative data from 3 or more experiments are shown for A, C, and D. The average of three independent experiments is shown in B. Means and standard deviations are shown and statistical significance was determined by Student’s T test (* p≤0.05, ** p<0.005).

B cell metabolic reprogramming is HIF1α independent yet requires cMyc

HIF1α and cMyc can induce transcription of metabolic genes involved in cell proliferation, including Glut1(38). cMyc also plays a key role to promote glutaminolysis and mitochondrial biogenesis that may be important in lymphocyte activation and proliferation. T cell activation has been shown to require cMyc, but not HIF1α, to induce aerobic glycolysis in initial activation (5). Conversely, Th17 T cells require HIF1α (18, 19). We therefore tested the roles of HIF1α and cMyc in B cell metabolic reprogramming following activation. Despite efficient deletion of HIF1α (Supplemental Fig. S1B), wild type and HIF1α-deficient B cells increased glycolysis equivalently after LPS stimulation (Fig. 4A). Therefore, like T cells (5), metabolic reprogramming in B cell activation does not require HIF1α. B cell activation through anti-IgM or LPS also led to rapid cMyc induction prior to cell cycle entry (Fig. 4B). In contrast to HIF1α and similar to T cells (5), cMyc was essential for activation-induced B cell upregulation of Glut1 (Fig. 4C) and glycolysis (Fig. 4D). Myc-dependent metabolic reprogramming was also evident by extracellular flux analysis, as Myc-deficient B cells failed to increase extracellular acidification rate that reflects glycolytic lactate production (ECAR; Fig. 4E) and mitochondrial oxygen consumption (OCR; Fig. 4F). Glutamine oxidation also increased in B cell activation and was Myc-dependent (Fig. 4G). Similar to T cells (5), however, not all metabolic pathways of activated B cells were Myc dependent. B cell stimulation reduced lipid oxidation (Fig. 4H) and increased pyruvate oxidation (Fig. 4I) regardless of cMyc expression. Although additional regulatory pathways also contribute, these data show that cMyc plays a key role in the initial metabolic reprogramming of stimulated B cells.

Figure 4. Metabolic reprogramming of B cells requires cMyc but not HIF1α.

Figure 4

A. Control (WT) and HIF1α-deficient (HIF1αfl/fl/ROSA26CreERT2 tamoxifen treated in vivo prior to isolation; HIF1α-KO) B cells were unstimulated (UNS) or cultured in LPS for 36 hours and glycolytic flux was measured using radiolabeled glucose. B. Fold induction of cMyc was determined by quantitative rtPCR in unstimulated (UNS) or B cells activated with anti-IgM or LPS for 24 hours. C-I. Control (WT) and cMyc-deficient (cMycfl/fl/ROSA26CreERT2 tamoxifen treated in vivo prior to isolation; Myc-KO) B cells were unstimulated (UNS) or cultured with LPS for 36 hours and analyzed by (C) immunoblot, (D) to measure glycolytic flux, (E) ECAR, (F) OCR, (G) glutamine oxidation, (H) fatty acid oxidation, and (I) pyruvate oxidation were directly measured using radiolabeled substrates. Means and standard deviations are shown and statistical significance was determined by Student’s T test (* p≤0.05, ** p<0.005, N.S. not significant). All experiments were repeated two or more times.

Anergic B cells are metabolically suppressed

Chronic exposure of immature or transitional B cells with self-antigen can lead to the self-tolerance mechanism of anergy, in which lymphocytes become desensitized to stimulation for proliferation and antibody production (39, 40). To what extent desensitized signal transduction events prevent metabolic reprogramming, however, has not been established. The metabolic response of anergic B cells was analyzed in response to LPS and antigen receptor stimulation with anti-IgM. B cells from Anti-Hen Egg Lysozyme (MD4) immunoglobulin transgenic mice crossed to soluble Hen Egg Lysozyme (ML5) transgenic mice are chronically exposed to self-antigen and rendered anergic (41). Control and MD4 ML5 transgenic B cells were stimulated for 6 hours with anti-IgM and analyzed by extracellular flux analysis for ECAR and OCR (Fig. 5A). Control B cells responded to anti-IgM with increased OCR and ECAR basal and maximal capacity. Anti-IgM stimulated MD4 ML5 transgenic B cells, in contrast, did not increase ECAR or OCR and maintained a metabolic phenotype similar to unstimulated B cells. 6 hours LPS stimulation of anergic MD4 ML5 B cells was sufficient to increase metabolism relative to resting control B cells (Fig. 5B). This increase in basal and maximal OCR and ECAR, however, was only partial, and anergic B cells remained less metabolically active than LPS-stimulated control MD4 B cells.

Figure 5. Anergic B cells are metabolically suppressed while BAFF transgenic B cells are primed for metabolic reprogramming.

Figure 5

A, B. Purified B cells from control (WT), MD4-transgenic, or MD4 ML5-double transgenic mice were cultured without stimulation or were stimulated with (A) anti-IgM or (B) LPS for 6 hours. Representative plots are shown on left of B cell OCR over time with addition of oligomycin (1 μM), mitochondrial uncoupler FCCP (0.5 μM), and electron transport inhibitors antimycin A (1.5μM) + rotenone (0.75μM) as indicated. Representative plots are shown on right of B cell ECAR over time with addition of glucose (10 mM), oligomycin (1 μM), and 2DG (20 mM) as indicated. C, D. Purified B cells from control (WT) or BAFF-transgenic mice were cultured without stimulation (UNS) or with LPS for 6 hours. Metabolic inhibitors were added during the assays as indicated. (C) Representative plots of B cell OCR (left) and ECAR (right) are shown. (D) Basal and maximal OCR and ECAR from B cells from control and BAFF-transgenic mice stimulated with LPS for 6 hours. E. Glucose uptake of B cells cultured without stimulation or with LPS for 24 hours measured using radiolabeled glucose. Means and standard deviations are shown and statistical significance was determined by Student’s T test (* p≤0.05, ** p<0.005, N.S. not significant). Data are representative of 3 or more experiments.

B cells chronically exposed to high levels of BAFF have increased metabolic capacity

Consistent with association with SLE (25-28, 31), B cells from the MB21 line of BAFF transgenic mice have elevated antibody production (Supplemental Fig. S2A). We, therefore, sought to determine if chronic overexposure to high levels of BAFF in BAFF transgenic mice influenced B cell metabolism. Importantly, the BAFF transgene is not directly expressed by B cells and is restricted to myeloid cells in vivo (31). B cells are, thus, chronically exposed to BAFF but do not produce this cytokine. Purified B cells from control non-transgenic (WT) or BAFF transgenic mice were unstimulated or treated with LPS for 6 hours and metabolic flux was measured. Acute in vitro BAFF treatment alone had no effect (Supplemental Fig. 2B) and unstimulated BAFF transgenic B cells had basal OCR and ECAR similar to control cells (Fig. 5C). Likewise, maximal ECAR of resting BAFF transgenic B cells was unchanged. Maximal OCR of resting BAFF transgenic B cells after treatment with the uncoupler FCCP, however, was higher than resting control B cells (Fig. 5C), demonstrating an altered metabolic status and elevated respiratory capacity. Six hours of stimulation with LPS increased OCR and ECAR for both control and BAFF transgenic B cells. While maximal OCRs were similar, the basal oxygen consumption of LPS-stimulated B cells from BAFF transgenic mice was significantly higher than that of control B cells (Fig. 5C, D). Glycolytic rates were also higher in LPS-stimulated BAFF transgenic than control B cells, with both increased basal and maximal glycolytic capacity (Fig. 5C, D). Increased glucose metabolism in BAFF transgenic B cells was confirmed by direct measurement of glucose uptake of unstimulated and 24 hour LPS-activated B cells (Fig. 5E). Together, these data show that chronic exposure to elevated BAFF leads to increased mitochondrial capacity when resting, and enhanced ability to increase glucose uptake and glycolysis with stimulation.

While the OCR/ECAR ratio of normal B cells was unchanged after stimulation, the altered metabolism of anergic and chronic BAFF overexposed B cells may have altered this proportionately balanced metabolic program. Indeed, after 6 hours of LPS stimulation, the OCR/ECAR ratio of control B cells was maintained (Fig. 6). The OCR/ECAR ratio in B cells from BAFF transgenic mice decreased significantly after 6 hours stimulation with LPS. This metabolic shift appeared to be due to the rapid increase in glycolysis of B cells from BAFF transgenic mice. However, the glycolytic phenotype was not maintained and OCR/ECAR fluctuated at later time points. In contrast, the OCR/ECAR ratio of LPS-stimulated anergic MD4 ML5 B cells was unchanged at each time point analyzed. Together, these data indicate that chronic BAFF overexposure leads to rapid induction of aerobic glycolysis, although this metabolic phenotype can vary over time.

Figure 6. Chronic BAFF overexposure leads to a glycolytic shift upon activation not observed in normal or tolerant B cells.

Figure 6

Purified B cells from wild type control (WT), BAFF-transgenic, and MD4 ML5 transgenic mice were LPS stimulated and OCR and ECAR were measured. The ratios of OCR/ECAR were normalized to unstimulated B cells (UNS) after 6, 12, and 24 hours. Data shown are means from 3 or more independent experiments and statistical significance was determined by Student’s T test (** p≤0.005, N.S. not significant).

B cells rely on sustained glycolytic flux to proliferate and produce antibody

The broad upregulation of glucose and mitochondrial metabolic pathways upon B cell activation suggested that B cells have potential metabolic flexibility to withstand loss of specific nutrients. To test if B cells rely on glucose metabolism, isolated B cells were stimulated in the presence of 2-DG or pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase inhibitor DCA. These inhibitors impair glucose metabolism at distinct steps, as 2-DG prevents glucose entry into glycolysis while DCA blocks PDHK-mediated phosphorylation of pyruvate dehydrogenase (Supplemental Fig. S3A) and promotes pyruvate entry into the TCA cycle rather than conversion to lactate. Although acting at the proximal and distal steps of glycolysis, both 2DG and DCA reduced ECAR (Fig. 1A, 4A, 4B, 5A, Supplemental Fig. S3B). Treatment with a low dose of 2-DG strongly suppressed the proliferation of LPS stimulated B cells (Fig. 7A). Importantly, LPS-induced secretion of IgG and IgM was curtailed with low-dose 2-DG (Fig. 7B, 7C). Similarly, DCA was non-toxic (Supplemental Fig. S3C) and, despite normal induction of B cell early activation markers (Supplemental Fig. S3D), sharply suppressed B cell proliferation and antibody production (Fig. 7A, B). DCA also suppressed proliferation and antibody secretion from human B cells stimulated with the TLR9 ligand, ODN (Fig. 7D, E). Because oxygen consumption increased in activated B cells, the dependence of IgM production on mitochondrial electron transport was also tested by treatment with rotenone. Consistent with a primary dependence on glycolysis, rotenone had no effect on IgM secretion (Fig. 7C). Therefore, despite the broad increase in metabolism of activated B cells, glycolysis and the specific conversion of pyruvate to lactate rather than acetyl-CoA appears essential for proliferation and antibody secretion.

Figure 7. B cells rely on sustained glycolytic flux to proliferate and produce antibody.

Figure 7

A, B, C. Purified murine B cells were labeled with CFSE and cultured in BAFF alone to maintain viability or stimulated with LPS in control media or with addition of 2DG (0.5mM), DCA (10mM), or rotenone (Rot; 80 nM) as indicated for (A) flow cytometry and ELISA for (B) IgG and (C) IgM secretion after 3 days. D, E. Purified human peripheral blood B cells were CFSE labeled and cultured without stimulation or stimulated with the TLR9 ligand unmethylated CpG oligonucleotide ODN (2μg/ml) for (D) flow cytometry and (E) ELISA for IgG secretion after 3 days. F, G. Normal bone marrow was transplanted into lethally irradiated Rag1−/− mice that were provided normal (non DCA, n=5) or DCA (n=5) drinking water. (F) B cell and total cell numbers in blood as determined by flow cytometry for CD19 and (G) ELISA for serum IgG concentration over time after transplant. H. Normal mice were immunized with 20 μg of NP-Ovalbumin (n=10) and given normal or DCA containing water. ELISA was used to measure total serum anti-NIP IgG concentrations over time. N.D. not determined detected. Data are representative of 3 or more independent experiments and means and standard deviations are shown. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s T test (* p≤0.05, ** p≤0.005, N.S. not significant).

Inhibition of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase Suppresses in vivo Antibody Production

We next tested the dependence of B cells on glycolytic flux for antibody production in vivo. To examine homeostatic antibody production, RAG1-deficient mice that lack endogenous antibodies were lethally-irradiated and reconstituted with wild type bone marrow. Mice were then provided control water or drinking water containing DCA to suppress aerobic glycolysis and instead promote glucose oxidation. DCA treatment did not affect lymphoid reconstitution, as numbers of both peripheral blood B and T cells were unchanged with DCA treatment (Fig. 7F). Importantly, recovery of total serum IgG was sharply suppressed with DCA treatment after 20 days of reconstitution (Fig. 7G). After 70 days, however, IgG levels in DCA-treated mice reached normal levels. The in vivo dependence of antibody production on high rates of glycolytic flux following acute stimulation was next examined by immunization in the presence of DCA. Mice were immunized with NP-Ovalbumin and treated with normal or DCA-containing drinking water and serum antibody levels were assessed after 15 and 19 days (Fig. 7H). Importantly, production of NP reactive anti-NIP antibody (36) was suppressed by DCA treatment.

Glut1 is essential for B cell homeostasis and antibody production

Pharmacologic inhibition of glycolysis suppressed B cell proliferation and antibody production, but the cell intrinsic dependence of B cells on glycolysis in vivo was unclear. To directly test the role of glucose uptake and glycolysis in B cell function, Glut1fl/fl mice were crossed to CD19-Cre transgenics to specifically delete Glut1 in B cells. Glut1-deficiency lowered peripheral B cell numbers, with a specific reduction in the number of IgMbrightB220+ mature B cells (Fig. 8A, B) to demonstrate a role for Glut1 in B cells. An increased percentage of IgMlowB220+ cells in Glut1fl/fl CD19-Cre mice were also IgD, suggesting increased frequency immature B cells or possible a population of B cells that had undergone class switch. These peripheral B cells had, however, deleted Glut1 and Glut1fl/fl CD19-Cre did not express Glut1 while control B cells expressed and upregulated Glut1 upon activation with LPS or anti-IgM (Fig. 8C). There was no apparent compensation through the related glucose transporter, Glut3, as control and Glut1-deficient resting B cells equivalently expressed and downregulated Glut3 after activation. Importantly, total serum IgM levels were significantly reduced in Glut1fl/fl CD19-Cre mice (Fig. 8D). At days 7 after immunization with NP-ovalbumin, anti-NP reactive NIP5 (high affinity) and NIP25 (high and low affinity) IgM and IgG were increased in control mice. Glut1fl/fl CD19-Cre mice, however, failed to efficiently induce total or NP-specific IgM of IgG secretion. Total IgM and IgG serum levels were also significantly lower in Glut1fl/fl CD19-Cre mice. Specific antibody production also remained low 15 and 21 days after immunization and the differences in total antibody levels persisted (Supplemental Fig. 4). Together, these data show that B cells require Glut1 and glucose uptake to maintain B cell populations and to support metabolic reprogramming necessary for maximal antibody secretion in vivo.

Figure 8. Glut1 is required for B cell homeostasis and efficient antibody production.

Figure 8

A, B. Control (Glut1+/+) and Glut1fl/fl CD19-Cre mice were analyzed by flow cytometry and spleen cell count to (A) determine the total number of B220+ cells in spleen and (B) IgM and IgD expression. (C) Purified B cells from control (Glut1+/+) and Glut1fl/fl CD19-Cre mice were unstimulated (−) or stimulated with LPS or anti-IgM for 24 hours and analyzed by immunoblot. D. Sera from 6 control (Glut1+/+) and 6 Glut1fl/fl CD19-Cre mice were analyzed by ELISA for total or NP-specific IgM on days 7, 15, and 21 after immunization with NP-CGG. NIP5 indicates high affinity and NIP25 indicates high and low affinity antibodies. Representative data of 3 or more independent experiments and means and standard deviations are shown. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s T test (* p≤0.05, ** p≤0.005).

Discussion

Lymphocyte metabolic needs must be met to sustain both cell viability and to allow cell functions including proliferation and effector activity (1). T cell activation has been shown to increase glucose uptake and glycolysis, leading to a predominantly glycolytic phenotype that is also characteristic of many cancer cells. B cells have also been shown to increase glucose metabolism upon stimulation (9, 10, 14). The details and relevance of this B cell metabolic transition from quiescence to activation, however, are not understood. Here we examined the glycolytic and mitochondrial metabolism of resting and stimulated normal, anergic, or chronically BAFF-stimulated and autoimmune prone B cells. Activation of normal B cells led to broadly increased metabolism but decreased lipid oxidation. Interestingly, unlike T cells or macrophages, normal B cells do not readily transition to a glycolytic metabolism and instead increase metabolism without specific shifts in the balance of lactate production to oxygen consumption. Anergic B cells appeared metabolically suppressed and failed to increase either aerobic glycolysis or mitochondrial oxidative metabolism upon stimulation. Conversely, B cells chronically exposed to high levels of BAFF were poised for rapid induction of aerobic glycolysis and metabolic reprogramming. These metabolic changes were essential for proliferation and antibody production, as pharmacologic inhibition of glycolysis or genetic deletion of Glut1 impaired B cells and suppressed antibody production following immunization. Thus, B cells share some features with the metabolic transition of activated T cells and are glycolysis-dependent, but respond differently than T cells to activating signals or have an intrinsically different metabolic program that can be modified by tolerance and autoreactivity.

A key feature of B cell activation through either the BCR or TLR4 is to induce cell growth, proliferation, and antibody production. Despite the distinct signaling mechanisms of BCR and TLR4, B cells underwent similar metabolic reprogramming. Catabolic metabolism, such as lipid oxidation, sharply decreased and cell growth was favored. Aerobic glycolysis has been shown to provide cancer cells and activated T cells with biosynthetic intermediates and to play a central feature in the rapid growth of these cells (6, 11). Consistent with previous reports (9, 10), we found that B cells also increased glycolysis upon activation. However in contrast to T cells, B cells started with higher rates of glycolysis and activated B cells proportionally increased mitochondrial oxygen consumption to maintain a balanced glycolytic and oxidative metabolism. The basis for increased oxygen consumption and oxidative metabolism is likely through increased glucose and glutamine oxidation, as lipids are conserved for cell growth rather than consumed for energy production. Surprisingly, however, efficient mitochondrial electron transport was not essential for antibody production. The role of mitochondrial metabolism in B cell activation and function remains uncertain, but differences from T cells or macrophages suggest that alternate signaling pathways contribute to B cell metabolic reprogramming, or that B cells have intrinsic metabolic distinctions.

It is evident that B cell metabolic reprogramming depends in part on cMyc. In T cells, HIF1α was shown dispensable while cMyc was required for upregulation of glycolytic genes, including Glut1, upon activation (5). B cells were similarly found to be independent of HIF1α but reliant on cMyc upregulation to increase glycolysis. Also like T cells (5), cMyc did not regulate all mitochondrial metabolic pathways, as lipid oxidation decreased and pyruvate oxidation increased after activation regardless of cMyc expression. The PI3K/Akt pathway has been shown to promote glucose uptake and glycolysis in BCR-stimulated B cells (10). In IL-4 stimulated B cells, however, the PI3K/Akt pathway appeared dispensable (10), with STAT6 instead required. In LPS-stimulated B cells, it is likely that cMyc combined with the PI3K/Akt pathway reprogram glucose metabolism. In this setting, it may be that cMyc leads to induction of gene expression and the PI3K/Akt pathway plays a post-translational and coordinating role to orchestrate the metabolic transition from resting to activation. While these pathways may control glucose metabolic pathways, the regulation of mitochondrial pathways remains uncertain.

We also show here that tolerance strongly influences B cell metabolism. Self-reactive B cells that become anergic were found metabolically suppressed to both BCR and TLR4 ligation. The completely inability of anergic B cells to metabolically reprogram in response to BCR stimulation was likely due in part to desensitized antigen receptor (39, 41). In particular, failure to activate the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (42) may prevent upregulation of glycolytic metabolism. LPS was able to partially induce glycolysis and mitochondrial oxygen consumption of anergic B cells. Therefore, tolerance does not lead to wholesale inhibition of metabolic reprogramming. It remains unclear to what extent anergic B cells have intrinsic metabolic defects relative to desensitized antigen receptor or TLR signals that fail to properly upregulate metabolic regulatory pathways. In both settings, however, metabolic reprogramming is decoupled from receptor stimulation in anergic B cells.

In contrast to B cell anergy, B cells chronically exposed to high levels of BAFF showed enhanced and more rapid metabolic reprogramming upon TLR4 ligation. In particular, aerobic glycolysis increased rapidly to transiently shift the balance of metabolism to predominantly glycolytic. Oxygen consumption also increased, albeit at a slower rate. The differential rates of glycolytic and mitochondrial metabolism in BAFF transgenic B cells may reflect altered activity of signaling pathways that control glycolysis relative to mitochondrial metabolism. Acute treatment with BAFF can activate the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (29, 30), but we found this insufficient to alter B cell metabolism on its own. It may be that chronic exposure to BAFF or additional signals are necessary. Thus, failure to properly induce tolerance due to chronically high levels of BAFF primes B cells to rapidly reprogram to the glycolytic metabolism, essential for activated antibody-producing cells.

The broad upregulation of glycolytic and mitochondrial metabolism in B cell activation suggests that targeting these pathways may disrupt B cell antibody production. However, the balanced metabolism and use of multiple metabolic pathways may have allowed functional redundancy and provide B cells the ability to utilize a variety of metabolic fuels. We show here that 2-DG and DCA each suppress B cell proliferation and antibody production. 2-DG and DCA suppress the entire glucose metabolism pathway or direct pyruvate towards mitochondrial oxidation, respectively. Although 2-DG can also induce cell death through ER stress (43), inhibiting PDHK did not affect B cell activation or survival. DCA nevertheless suppressed glycolytic flux to reduce the ability of lactate dehydrogenase to recycle NAD+, thus potentially increasing ROS production (44). Therefore, the equivalent inhibition of proliferation and antibody production by these two compounds, suggest that maintenance of aerobic glycolysis and lactate production are key events in antibody production. It may also be that glucose-derived metabolites are essential for biosynthesis or signaling to support B cell activation, such as appears to be the case for glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate in T cell production of IFNγ (15).

The glucose transporter family consists of fourteen members and we examined conditional deletion of Glut1 to test this mechanism of glucose uptake and B cell intrinsic glucose metabolism in vivo. Interestingly, B cells upregulated Glut1 but downregulated Glut3 upon activation, showing complex regulation and expression of multiple glucose transporters. B cell expression of other glucose transporters has not been well established, but Glut1, Glut3, Glut4, Glut8, and Glut11 may all be expressed and contribute to B cell nutrient uptake (45). Our data show, however, that Glut1 plays an essential role among these glucose transporters to support B cells. These data also demonstrate an in vivo cell intrinsic requirement for glucose uptake in normal B cell homeostasis and antibody production following immunization.

Overall, the role of lymphocyte metabolism in self-tolerance and autoimmunity is poorly understood. T cells in SLE patients have dysfunctional and increased metabolic activity, with hyperpolarized mitochondria (46). Conversely, in vitro induction of T cell tolerance leads to a metabolically anergic state, in which tolerant T cells fail to increase glucose metabolism upon activation (23). We show here that B cells metabolically reprogram upon activation in a way that resemble activated T cells, yet have a greater balance of mitochondrial metabolism to prevent the glycolytic shift observed in T cells. Tolerance status impacted both glycolysis and mitochondrial pathways to either suppress or poise B cells for metabolic reprogramming. The specific mechanistic basis for metabolic modulation in tolerance and autoimmunity remain uncertain. However, targeting glycolytic pathways to mimic the suppressed metabolic state of anergy was sufficient both in vitro and in vivo to disrupt antibody production. In addition, it is likely that specific B cell subsets may have metabolic distinctions that could be exploited to target distinct cell populations. Further understanding of the regulation of lymphocyte metabolic pathways may provide new directions to suppress antibody production and promote a tolerant phenotype in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge members of the Rathmell lab for assistance and comments throughout.

Support was provided by the Lupus Research Institute (J.C.R.), the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (J.C.R.), R01HL108006 (J.C.R.), R56AI102074 (J.C.R.), R01AI56363 (G.K.), R01AI81597 (G.K.), R01GM52735 (D.R.G.), R01AI47891 (D.R.G.), and UO1HL087947 (E.D.A.).

Abbreviations used in this article

BAFF

B cell activating Factor

BSA

bovine serum albumin

DCA

dichloroacetate

2-DG

2-deoxyglucose

ECAR

extracellular acidification rate

FCCP

p-trifluoromethoxy carbonyl cyanide phenyl hydrazine

HIF1α

Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1α

Myc

v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog

NP

(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl) acetyl

NIP

(4-hydroxy-3-iodo-5-nitrophenyl) acetyl

OCR

Oxygen consumption rate

OVA

Ovalbumin

PDHK

pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase

SLE

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

TCA

tricarboxylic acid cycle

Footnotes

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Rathmell JC. Metabolism and autophagy in the immune system: immunometabolism comes of age. Immunol Rev. 2012;249:5–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01158.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Frauwirth KA, Riley JL, Harris MH, Parry RV, Rathmell JC, Plas DR, Elstrom RL, June CH, Thompson CB. The CD28 signaling pathway regulates glucose metabolism. Immunity. 2002;16:769–777. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00323-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jacobs SR, Herman CE, Maciver NJ, Wofford JA, Wieman HL, Hammen JJ, Rathmell JC. Glucose Uptake Is Limiting in T Cell Activation and Requires CD28-Mediated Akt-Dependent and Independent Pathways. J Immunol. 2008;180:4476–4486. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.4476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang R, Green DR. Metabolic reprogramming and metabolic dependency in T cells. Immunol Rev. 2012;249:14–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01155.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang RN, Dillon CP, Shi LZ, Milasta S, Carter R, Finkelstein D, McCormick LL, Fitzgerald P, Chi HB, Munger J, Green DR. The Transcription Factor Myc Controls Metabolic Reprogramming upon T Lymphocyte Activation. Immunity. 2011;35:871–882. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vats D, Mukundan L, Odegaard JI, Zhang L, Smith KL, Morel CR, Wagner RA, Greaves DR, Murray PJ, Chawla A. Oxidative metabolism and PGC-1beta attenuate macrophage-mediated inflammation. Cell Metab. 2006;4:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Krawczyk CM, Holowka T, Sun J, Blagih J, Amiel E, DeBerardinis RJ, Cross JR, Jung E, Thompson CB, Jones RG, Pearce EJ. Toll-like receptor-induced changes in glycolytic metabolism regulate dendritic cell activation. Blood. 2010;115:4742–4749. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-249540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Doughty CA, Bleiman BF, Wagner DJ, Dufort FJ, Mataraza JM, Roberts MF, Chiles TC. Antigen receptor-mediated changes in glucose metabolism in B lymphocytes: role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling in the glycolytic control of growth. Blood. 2006;107:4458–4465. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-4788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dufort FJ, Bleiman BF, Gumina MR, Blair D, Wagner DJ, Roberts MF, Abu-Amer Y, Chiles TC. Cutting edge: IL-4-mediated protection of primary B lymphocytes from apoptosis via Stat6-dependent regulation of glycolytic metabolism. J Immunol. 2007;179:4953–4957. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.4953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.MacIver NJ, Michalek RD, Rathmell JC. Metabolic regulation of T lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31:259–283. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cham CM, Driessens G, O’Keefe JP, Gajewski TF. Glucose deprivation inhibits multiple key gene expression events and effector functions in CD8+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38:2438–2450. doi: 10.1002/eji.200838289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cham CM, Gajewski TF. Glucose availability regulates IFN-gamma production and p70S6 kinase activation in CD8+ effector T cells. J Immunol. 2005;174:4670–4677. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Blair D, Dufort FJ, Chiles TC. Protein kinase Cbeta is critical for the metabolic switch to glycolysis following B-cell antigen receptor engagement. Biochem J. 2012;448:165–169. doi: 10.1042/BJ20121225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chang CH, Curtis JD, Maggi LB, Jr., Faubert B, Villarino AV, O’Sullivan D, Huang SC, van der Windt GJ, Blagih J, Qiu J, Weber JD, Pearce EJ, Jones RG, Pearce EL. Posttranscriptional control of T cell effector function by aerobic glycolysis. Cell. 2013;153:1239–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Michalek RD, Gerriets VA, Jacobs SR, Macintyre AN, Maciver NJ, Mason EF, Sullivan SA, Nichols AG, Rathmell JC. Cutting Edge: Distinct Glycolytic and Lipid Oxidative Metabolic Programs Are Essential for Effector and Regulatory CD4+ T Cell Subsets. J Immunol. 2011;186:3299–3303. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhu J, Yamane H, Paul WE. Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations. Annu Rev Immunol. 2010;28:445–489. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dang EV, Barbi J, Yang HY, Jinasena D, Yu H, Zheng Y, Bordman Z, Fu J, Kim Y, Yen HR, Luo W, Zeller K, Shimoda L, Topalian SL, Semenza GL, Dang CV, Pardoll DM, Pan F. Control of T(H)17/T(reg) Balance by Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1. Cell. 2011;146:772–784. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shi LZ, Wang R, Huang G, Vogel P, Neale G, Green DR, Chi H. HIF1alpha-dependent glycolytic pathway orchestrates a metabolic checkpoint for the differentiation of TH17 and Treg cells. J Exp Med. 2011;208:1367–1376. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Johnson A, Milner J, Makowski L. The inflammation highway: metabolism accelerates inflammatory traffic in obesity. Immunol Rev. 2012 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01151.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pearce EL, Walsh MC, Cejas PJ, Harms GM, Shen H, Wang LS, Jones RG, Choi Y. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature. 2009;460:103–107. doi: 10.1038/nature08097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.van der Windt GJ, Everts B, Chang CH, Curtis JD, Freitas TC, Amiel E, Pearce EJ, Pearce EL. Mitochondrial respiratory capacity is a critical regulator of CD8+ T cell memory development. Immunity. 2012;36:68–78. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zheng Y, Delgoffe GM, Meyer CF, Chan W, Powell JD. Anergic T cells are metabolically anergic. J Immunol. 2009;183:6095–6101. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pillai S, Mattoo H, Cariappa A. B cells and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011;23:721–731. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boneparth A, Davidson A. B-cell activating factor targeted therapy and lupus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(Suppl 4):S2. doi: 10.1186/ar3920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang J, Roschke V, Baker KP, Wang Z, Alarcon GS, Fessler BJ, Bastian H, Kimberly RP, Zhou T. Cutting edge: a role for B lymphocyte stimulator in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2001;166:6–10. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.1.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mackay F, Woodcock SA, Lawton P, Ambrose C, Baetscher M, Schneider P, Tschopp J, Browning JL. Mice transgenic for BAFF develop lymphocytic disorders along with autoimmune manifestations. J Exp Med. 1999;190:1697–1710. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.11.1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ota M, Duong BH, Torkamani A, Doyle CM, Gavin AL, Ota T, Nemazee D. Regulation of the B cell receptor repertoire and self-reactivity by BAFF. J Immunol. 2010;185:4128–4136. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Patke A, Mecklenbrauker I, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Tarakhovsky A. BAFF controls B cell metabolic fitness through a PKC beta- and Akt-dependent mechanism. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2551–2562. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Woodland RT, Fox CJ, Schmidt MR, Hammerman PS, Opferman JT, Korsmeyer SJ, Hilbert DM, Thompson CB. Multiple signaling pathways 28 promote B lymphocyte stimulator dependent B-cell growth and survival. Blood. 2008;111:750–760. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-077222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gavin AL, Duong B, Skog P, Ait-Azzouzene D, Greaves DR, Scott ML, Nemazee D. deltaBAFF, a splice isoform of BAFF, opposes full-length BAFF activity in vivo in transgenic mouse models. J Immunol. 2005;175:319–328. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.1.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.de Alboran IM, O’Hagan RC, Gartner F, Malynn B, Davidson L, Rickert R, Rajewsky K, DePinho RA, Alt FW. Analysis of C-MYC function in normal cells via conditional gene-targeted mutation. Immunity. 2001;14:45–55. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00088-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.de Luca C, Kowalski TJ, Zhang Y, Elmquist JK, Lee C, Kilimann MW, Ludwig T, Liu SM, Chua SC., Jr. Complete rescue of obesity, diabetes, and infertility in db/db mice by neuron-specific LEPR-B transgenes. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:3484–3493. doi: 10.1172/JCI24059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Young CD, Lewis AS, Rudolph MC, Ruehle MD, Jackman MR, Yun UJ, Ilkun O, Pereira R, Abel ED, Anderson SM. Modulation of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) expression levels alters mouse mammary tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wieman HL, Wofford JA, Rathmell JC. Cytokine stimulation promotes glucose uptake via phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt regulation of Glut1 activity and trafficking. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:1437–1446. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-07-0593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kuraoka M, Liao D, Yang K, Allgood SD, Levesque MC, Kelsoe G, Ueda Y. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase expression and activity in the absence of germinal centers: insights into hyper-IgM syndrome. J Immunol. 2009;183:3237–3248. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.van der Windt GJ, Pearce EJ. Metabolic Switching and Fuel Choice During T Cell Differentiation And Memory Development. Immunol Rev. 2012 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01150.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB. The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab. 2008;7:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Goodnow CC, Sprent J, Fazekas de St Groth B, Vinuesa CG. Cellular and genetic mechanisms of self tolerance and autoimmunity. Nature. 2005;435:590–597. doi: 10.1038/nature03724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yarkoni Y, Getahun A, Cambier JC. Molecular underpinning of B-cell anergy. Immunol Rev. 2010;237:249–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00936.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Goodnow CC. Pathways for self-tolerance and the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Lancet. 2001;357:2115–2121. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)05185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Browne CD, Del Nagro CJ, Cato MH, Dengler HS, Rickert RC. Suppression of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate production is a key determinant of B cell anergy. Immunity. 2009;31:749–760. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.08.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ramirez-Peinado S, Alcazar-Limones F, Lagares-Tena L, El Mjiyad N, Caro-Maldonado A, Tirado OM, Munoz-Pinedo C. 2-deoxyglucose induces Noxadependent apoptosis in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2011;71:6796–6806. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kaplon J, Zheng L, Meissl K, Chaneton B, Selivanov VA, Mackay G, van der Burg SH, Verdegaal EM, Cascante M, Shlomi T, Gottlieb E, Peeper DS. A key role for mitochondrial gatekeeper pyruvate dehydrogenase in oncogene-induced senescence. Nature. 2013;498:109–112. doi: 10.1038/nature12154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.McBrayer SK, Cheng JC, Singhal S, Krett NL, Rosen ST, Shanmugam M. Multiple myeloma exhibits novel dependence on GLUT4, GLUT8, and GLUT11: implications for glucose transporter-directed therapy. Blood. 2012;119:4686–4697. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-377846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Perl A, Nagy G, Gergely P, Puskas F, Qian Y, Banki K. Apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction in lymphocytes of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Methods Mol Med. 2004;102:87–114. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-805-6:087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES