Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2014 Jan 23;16(5):652–661. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not307

MiR-196a exerts its oncogenic effect in glioblastoma multiforme by inhibition of IκBα both in vitro and in vivo

Guang Yang 1,, Dayong Han 1,, Xin Chen 1,, Daming Zhang 1, Lu Wang 1, Chen Shi 1, Weiguang Zhang 1, Chenguang Li 1, Xiaofeng Chen 1, Huailei Liu 1, Dongzhi Zhang 1, Jianhao Kang 1, Fei Peng 1, Ziyi Liu 1, Jiping Qi 1, Xin Gao 1, Jing Ai 1, Changbin Shi 1, Shiguang Zhao 1,
PMCID: PMC3984554  PMID: 24463357

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have revealed that miR-196a is upregulated in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and that it correlates with the clinical outcome of patients with GBM. However, its potential regulatory mechanisms in GBM have never been reported.

Methods

We used quantitative real-time PCR to assess miR-196a expression levels in 132 GBM specimens in a single institution. Oncogenic capability of miR-196a was detected by apoptosis and proliferation assays in U87MG and T98G cells. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the expression of IκBα in GBM tissues, and a luciferase reporter assay was carried out to confirm whether IκBα is a direct target of miR-196a. In vivo, xenograft tumors were examined for an antiglioma effect of miR-196a inhibitors.

Results

We present for the first time evidence that miR-196a could directly interact with IκBα 3′-UTR to suppress IκBα expression and subsequently promote activation of NF-κB, consequently promoting proliferation of and suppressing apoptosis in GBM cells both in vitro and in vivo. Our study confirmed that miR-196a was upregulated in GBM specimens and that high levels of miR-196a were significantly correlated with poor outcome in a large cohort of GBM patients. Our data from human tumor xenografts in nude mice treated with miR-196 inhibitors demonstrated that inhibition of miR-196a could ameliorate tumor growth in vivo.

Conclusions

MiR-196a exerts its oncogenic effect in GBM by inhibiting IκBα both in vitro and in vivo. Our findings provide new insights into the pathogenesis of GBM and indicate that miR-196a may predict clinical outcome of GBM patients and serve as a new therapeutic target for GBM.

Keywords: apoptosis, glioblastoma, IκBα, miR-196a, tumor growth


Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and deadliest primary malignant brain tumor.1 Despite intense multimodality therapies including surgical excision, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, the prognosis of GBM patients still remains unfavorable.2 Thus, there remains a critical need to develop novel predictive and more effective therapeutic strategies against this malignancy.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous, small noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression by inducing translational inhibition or direct degradation of target mRNAs through base pairing to partially complementary sites.3 Alteration of miRNA expression and activity has been associated with a range of human diseases, including cancer.35 For example, miR-196a is one of the most important miRNAs involved in cancer.6,7 Its aberrant expression has been observed in a variety of solid tumors.810 Recent studies revealed that miR-196a was upregulated in GBM and correlated with the clinical outcome of patients with GBM.11 However, its potential regulatory mechanisms in GBM have never been reported.

Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the potential regulatory mechanisms of miR-196a in GBM and to identify a potential predictive biomarker for the treatment of GBM patients. We showed for the first time that upregulation of miR-196a could promote proliferation of and suppress apoptosis in GBM cells both in vitro and in vivo through direct suppression of IκBα expression. Furthermore, we described that overexpression of miR-196a is strongly associated with high risk and poor prognosis in a large cohort of GBM patients at a single institution.

Materials and Methods

Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme and Their Surgically Excised Specimens

Tumor specimens were collected from 132 GBM patients who underwent surgery in the Department of Neurosurgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University in China between 2005 and 2009. Tissue samples were routinely processed for histological diagnosis in strict accordance with World Health Organization criteria. Normal brain tissues (NBTs) were obtained from normal adjacent tissues away from tumor tissues or non-neoplastic brain diseases and were histologically confirmed to be free of any pathological lesions. The follow-up data were available for 114 cases. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Harbin Medical University, and the participants gave informed consent.

Cell Culture and Transfection

The human glioblastoma U87MG and T98G cells and human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). All cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen). MiR-196a mimics, miR-196a inhibitors (anti-miR-196a antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotide, AMO-miR-196a), negative control miRNA (NC) (GenePharma), reporter plasmid, or pc-IκBα plasmid were transfected into cultured cells using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions.

Cell Viability Assays

U87MG or T98G cells were seeded onto 96-well plates and transfected as described above. On each of 3 consecutive days, 20 μL of dimethyl thiazolyl diphenyl tetrazolium (MTT; 5 mg/mL; Sigma) was added to each well. The reaction was then stopped by lysing cells with 200 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide. Optical density measurements were obtained at a wavelength of 570 nm using spectrophotometric analysis (Tecan).

Hoechst 33258 Staining

After transfection of fluorescent dye labeled FAM-AMO-miR-196a or FAM-NC (GenePharma) for 24 hours, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes, and then stained with 50 μM of Hoechst 33258 (Sigma) for 10 minutes in the dark. Nuclear morphological change in GBM cells undergoing apoptosis were detected by fluorescence microscopy (Nikon).

Apoptosis Assay

The apoptosis ratio was analyzed using the Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Apoptotic cells were examined and quantified using flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson). All experiments were repeated in triplicate.

RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total RNA was isolated from cultured cells using a Trizol standard protocol (Invitrogen). For formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) GBM samples, total RNA was extracted from 5 to 10 of 10 μm-thick tissue sections using the Ambion RecoverAll kit (Ambio) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed in triplicate in the ABI 7500HT fast real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) and normalized with U6 and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) endogenous control. Total RNA from NBTs was used as a control. MiR-196a and U6 levels were measured with the TaqMan microRNA assay kit, and endogenous mRNA levels of IκBα and GAPDH were detected using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix kit in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems). The RT-PCR primers for IκBα and GAPDH are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Construction of IκBα 3′Untranslated Region (3′UTR) Reporter Plasmid and pc-IκBα Plasmid

The IκBα-3′UTR was amplified using the primers listed in Supplementary table 1 and cloned into the psi-CHECK-2 vector (Promega) at 2 restriction sites for XhoI and EcoRI. Mutations were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis into putative binding sites in the 3′UTR of IκBα gene for miR-196a using the TaKaRa MutanBEST Kit (Takara). To construct IκBα expression plasmid, the full-length cDNA was first amplified using the primers listed in Supplementary table 1 and then cloned into the pcDNA3.1 vector (Invitrogen) at 2 restriction sites for HindIII and EcoRI.

Luciferase Assays

HEK 293T cells were cotransfected on 24-well plates by Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) with 0.5 μg of reporter plasmid and miR-196a mimics or control miRNA at a final concentration of 50 nM. Luciferase assays were performed using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All experiments were repeated at least 3 times with duplicate samples.

Protein Extraction and Western Blot

The proteins were extracted from human GBM cells and specimens. Lysate was separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the gel was blotted onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore). The membrane was blocked in 5% nonfat milk, and then incubated with either rabbit anti-human NF-κB p65 (1:200; Santa Cruz), Caspase-3 (1:200; Santa Cruz), Bcl-2 (1:200; Santa Cruz), Bax (1:200; Santa Cruz), mouse anti-human IκBα (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology), or β-actin (1:1000; Santa Cruz). After washing, the membrane was incubated with the fluorescence-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (1:4000; Invitrogen). The bound secondary antibody was quantified using the Odyssey v1.2 software (LI-COR) by measuring the band intensity (area × optical density) for each group and then normalized with β-actin. The final results are expressed as fold changes by normalizing the data to control values.

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin-embedded sections of excised GBM specimens were immunostained for IκBα protein. Staining was performed with the streptavidin–biotin peroxidase complex method according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Dako). Mouse anti-human IκBα primary antibody (1:50; Cell Signaling Technology) was administered, followed by secondary goat anti-mouse IgG (Dako). Negative controls were performed throughout the entire immunohistochemistry procedure. All of the immunostained sections were reviewed in blinded fashion by 2 investigators.

Tumorigenicity Assays in Nude Mice

5 × 106 U87MG or T98G cell suspension was subcutaneously injected into the flank of 5-week-old female athymic BALB/c nude mice (Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Company). At 10 days after the implantation, the mice were treated with AMO-antagomiR-196a or scrambled control antagomiR (GenePharmaa) in 10 μL Lipofectamine through local injection of the xenograft tumor at multiple sites. (AMO-antagomiR is a chemically modified antisense oligonucleotide, which could be used to inhibit endogenous miRNA in animal research.)12,13 The treatment was performed once every 3 days for 18 days. The tumor volume was measured with a caliper once every 3 days using the following formula: volume = length × width2/2. Growth rates were determined by measuring tumor size over time. All animal procedures were approved by the Harbin Medical University Animal Committee.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS13.0 software. Student t test, ANOVA, or chi-square analysis were applied, where appropriate. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Survival data were evaluated by using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. A probability of <.05 (*) or <.001 (**) was considered significant.

Results

MiR-196a Upregulation Correlates with Clinical Outcome of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme

It has recently been reported that high levels of miR-196a in 39 human GBM specimens were significantly correlated with the malignant progression of gliomas and poor survival rates.11 To further confirm those findings, we detected the expression levels of miR-196a in U87MG and T98G cells and a larger cohort of 132 FFPE GBM specimens by qRT-PCR. Our data showed miR-196a levels were significantly higher in GBM cell lines and specimens as compared with those in NBT samples (P < .001, Fig. 1A and Supplementary Fig. 1A). We observed high variability in miR-196a expression in GBM specimens as compared with NBT samples. Moreover, the expression levels of miR-196a were significantly correlated with patient survival. Patients with miR-196a expression levels above the median showed a shorter overall survival when compared with patients in the low-expression group measured by Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis with a log-rank comparison (P < .001; Fig. 1B). The median survival time of patients whose tumors had low-level expression of miR-196a was 12 months (95% CI, 10.07–13.93), whereas the median survival time of those with high expression levels of miR-196a was only 7 months (95% CI, 4.95–9.05). The log-rank test showed a statistically significant difference in the median survival (P = .001). Subsequently, we determined the correlation of miR-196a expression with clinical variables (sex, age, KPS, tumor size, and extent of resection) using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that expression levels of miR-196a were an independent and significant predictor of overall survival in GBM patients (P = .001; HR = 2.326; Table 1), which is consistent with previous studies.11

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Clinical significance of miR-196a in GBM patients. (A) miR-196a expression in 132 FFPE GBM specimens. NBTs refer to normal brain tissues. (B) Correlation of miR-196a expression with overall survival in GBM patients.

Table 1.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of overall survival in archival GBM patients

Univariate Analysis
Multivariate Analysis
Variables No. of Patients (%) Median OS (months) P value (log-rank) Variate HR P value
Sex .924 Sex .989
 Male 81 (61.36%) 10  Female vs male 1.003
 Female 51 (38.64%) 10
Age (y) .021 Age (y) .078
 ≤60 100 (75.76%) 10  >60 vs ≤60 1.637
 >60 32 (24.24%) 7
KPS .031 KPS .033
 <70 26 (19.70%) 9  ≥70 vs <70 0.563
 ≥70 106 (80.30%) 10
Tumor size (cm) .717 Tumor size (cm) .333
 <6 86 (65.15%) 10  ≥6 vs <6 1.277
 ≥6 37 (28.03%) 9
Extent of resection <.001 Extent of resection <.001
 Not GTR 38 (28.79%) 7  GTR vs not 0.373
 GTR 94 (71.21%) 12
MiR-196a expression <.001 MiR-196a expression .001
 Low 12  High vs low 2.326
 High 7

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; GTR, gross total resection.

Role of miR-196a in Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Vitro

To explore the potential biological significance of miR-196a in tumorigenesis, we transfected U87MG or T98G cells with miR-196a mimics, inhibitors (anti-miR-196a antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotide, AMO-miR-196a), or negative control miRNA. MiR-196a mimic-transfected cells showed a significant increase in miR-196a expression, while AMO-miR-196a-transfected cells demonstrated a significant decrease in miR-196a expression when compared with cells transfected with scrambled negative control (Fig. 2A). MTT results showed that cells transfected with miR-196a mimics had a significantly increased growth rate as compared with cells transfected with negative control, whereas those transfected with AMO-miR-196a had a significantly decreased proliferation rate (Fig. 2B). To determine the effect of miR-196a on apoptosis, we performed Annexin V and propidium iodide double staining in U87MG or T98G cells. MiR-196a mimic-transfected cells had a significant decrease in Annexin V-positive apoptotic cells as compared with scrambled control-transfected cells, while AMO-miR-196a-transfected cells showed a significant increase in Annexin V-positive apoptotic cells (Fig. 2C and D). In addition, after transfection of fluorescent dye labeled FAM-AMO-miR-196a or FAM-NC, we stained U87MG and T98G cells with Hoechst 33258. Our results revealed fluorescent dye concentrated and nuclei condensed and fragmented in FAM-AMO-miR-196a transfected cells, indicating that these cells underwent apoptosis (Fig. 2E). These results demonstrated that ectopic expression of miR-196a promoted cell proliferation and inhibited cell apoptosis in U87MG and T98G cells.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Effect of miR-196a on cell proliferation and apoptosis in vitro. (A) miR-196a expression was quantified by qRT–PCR in U87MG and T98G cells 48 h after transfection of miR-196a mimics, AMO-miR-196a, or negative control oligo. (B) Cell viability was determined by MTT assay in U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection. (C) Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry in U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection. (D) Graphical representation of the apoptosis analysis in (C). (E) Hoechst 33258 staining of U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection of fluorescent dye labeled FAM-miRNA. Arrows indicate apoptotic cells. Original magnification is 400×. Data are presented as mean ± SEM for 3 separate experiments performed in duplicate. *P < .05; *P < .001.

IκBα Is a Direct Target of miR-196a

To further explore the regulatory mechanisms of miR-196a in GBM, we analyzed databases miRanda, PicTar, and TargetScan. We found that miR-196a likely regulates the IκBα gene since IκBα may be a target for miR-196a (Fig. 3A). In fact, IκBα has been reported to be a key mediator of cell apoptosis and invasion and is closely associated with survival in GBM patients.14 To determine whether miR-196a could regulate IκBα at mRNA and protein levels, qRT-PCR and Western blot were performed. Our qRT-PCR results showed that the expression of IκBα mRNA in U87MG and T98G cells transfected with miR-196a mimics was downregulated as compared with cells transfected with negative control (Fig. 3B). Western blot analysis also revealed that the expression of IκBα protein in U87MG and T98G cells transfected with miR-196a mimics was downregulated as compared with cells transfected with negative control (Fig. 3C). These data demonstrated that miR-196a could regulate IκBα at both mRNA and protein levels.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

IκBα is a direct target of miR-196a. (A) The potential interaction between miR-196a and putative binding sites in the IκBα 3′-UTR. The mutant sequences are equivalent to the wild-type ones, except mutations at the 3′ end of target site are underlined. (B) Relative IκBα mRNA expression was determined by qRT-PCR in U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection. (C) IκBα protein expression was determined by Western blot in U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection. β-actin was used as a loading control. (D) Photomicrographs showing representative results of hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical analysis of IκBα protein expression in human GBM specimens and NBTs. Original magnification ×200. (E) A chi-square table showing a significant inverse correlation between miR-196a and IκBα expression (P < .001). (F) Luciferase activities were analyzed in 293 T cells 48 hours after cotransfection of miR-196a mimics and either wild-type or mutant IκBα 3′-UTR. Data are presented as mean ± SEM for 3 separate experiments performed in duplicate. *P < .05; **P < .001.

We further examined IκBα protein levels by immunohistochemistry in GBM specimens that were also used to measure miR-196a expression. Our results showed that 87% of GBM specimens exhibited lower protein levels of IκBα as compared with NBTs (Fig. 3D). Further analysis revealed the significant reciprocal association of IκBα protein levels with miR-196a expression in GBM specimens (chi-square test; P < .001; Fig. 3E).

To assess whether there was a direct interaction between miR-196a and IκBα, wild-type or mutant 3′UTR of IκBα gene was constructed into the dual-luciferase reporter plasmid system (Fig. 3A). Subsequently, miR-196a mimics or negative control was cotransfected with the 3′UTR of IκBα dual-luciferase reporter plasmid into HEK293T cells. We observed that miR-196a decreased the relative luciferase activity of the reporter containing the wild-type 3′UTR of IκBα. However, mutations in the predicted binding site of miR-196a in the 3′UTR of IκBα gene abrogated the aforementioned inhibitory effect of miR-196a, demonstrating that IκBα is a direct target of miR-196a (Fig. 3F).

Inhibition of IκBα Is Essential for miR-196a–induced Proliferation and Suppressed Apoptosis

To investigate the inhibitory role of IκBα in the miR-196a-induced proliferation and suppressed apoptosis in GBM cells, we studied the effect of knockdown of IκBα by the specific IκBα siRNA. Fig. 4A shows that IκBα protein expression was significantly inhibited, as we expected. Our results further revealed that IκBα siRNA has a similar biological effect on proliferation and apoptosis as miR-196a in GBM cells (Fig. 4B and D). Subsequently, we constructed and transfected pc-IκBα into U87MG or T98G cells. The expression levels of IκBα mRNA and protein in pc-IκBα-transfected cells were significantly increased as compared with pc-empty-transfected cells (Fig. 4E and Supplementary Fig. 1B). After U87MG or T98G cells were cotransfected with both miR-196a mimics and pc-IκBα, we found that proliferation and apoptosis regulated by ectopic expression of miR-196a was rescued by pc-IκBα (Fig. 4F–H). These data suggested that inhibition of IκBα is essential for miR-196a–induced proliferation and suppressed apoptosis.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Inhibition of IκBα is essential for miR-196a–induced proliferation and inhibited apoptosis. (A) IκBα protein expression was determined by Western blot in U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection of specific IκBα siRNA. (B) Cell viability was determined by MTT assay in U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection of IκBα siRNA. (C) Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry in U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection of IκBα siRNA. (D) Graphical representation of the apoptosis analysis in (C). (E) IκBα protein expression was determined by Western blot in U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection of empty vector + NC oligo, pc-IκBα + NC oligo, or pc-IκBα + miR-196a mimics. (F) Cell viability was determined by MTT assay in U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection. (G) Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry in U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection. (H) Graphical representation of the apoptosis analysis in (G). Data are presented as mean ± SEM for 3 separate experiments performed in duplicate. * P < .05; **P < .001.

Overexpression of miR-196a can also affect NF-κB regulated expression of several apoptosis-related proteins (Fig. 5A). Western blot analysis indicated that expression levels of NF-κB subunit p65 were markedly increased. As expected, the expression levels of Bax and cleaved caspase-3 proteins were markedly decreased in miR-196a mimics transfected U87MG and T98G cells, while Bcl-2 protein levels were significantly increased. However, AMO-miR-196a can reverse the expression of these apoptosis-related proteins (Fig. 5A). Therefore, these results suggested that miR-196a-induced proliferation and suppressed apoptosis in GBM cells could be regulated by inhibition of IκBα via NF-κB-apoptosis signaling.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Inhibition of MiR-196a ameliorates tumorigenesis of GBM cells in vivo. (A) Expression of apoptosis-related proteins was determined by Western blot in U87MG and T98G cells 48 hours after transfection of miR-196a mimics, AMO-miR-196a, or negative control. (B) Photograph showing excised tumors in representative mice in each group implanted with U87MG or T98G cells (n = 8 mice per treatment group) on day 28 after treatment. (C) Graph showing growth inhibition of human tumor xenografts in nude mice treated with AMO-antagomiR-196a. (D) Graph illustrating the excised tumor weight on day 28 after tumor implantation. (E) Relative miR-196a expression was determined by qRT-PCR in xenograft tumor specimens.

Inhibition of miR-196a Ameliorates Tumorigenesis of GBM Cells in Vivo

To explore whether miR-196a affects tumorigenesis in vivo, U87MG or T98G cells were subcutaneously implanted in the flank of nude mice, respectively. The weight of tumor was substantially lower in animals injected with chemically modified miR-196a inhibitors (AMO-miR-196a), and the mean tumor size at the end of the experiment was markedly smaller in these mice as compared with that in the NC-injected mice (Fig. 5B). The growth curve of tumor xenografts showed that AMO-antagomiR-196a inhibited tumor growth (Fig. 5C). The average tumor weight in the NC group was significantly higher than that in the AMO-antagomiR-196a-injected group (Fig. 5D). qRT-PCR analysis was also performed to detect miR-196a expression in tumor xenografts. Our results showed that the expression levels of miR-196a in tumor tissues of AMO-antagomiR-196a-injected mice were significantly lower than those in tumor specimens of NC-injected mice (Fig. 5E). These results indicated that inhibition of miR-196a could ameliorate tumor growth in vivo.

Discussion

Although recent reports suggested that miR-196a was upregulated in GBM and correlated with the clinical outcome of GBM patients, its potential regulatory mechanisms in GBM have never been addressed.11 In this study, we presented the first evidence that miR-196a directly interacted with the IκBα 3′-UTR to suppress IκBα expression and subsequently promote activation of NF-κB, consequently promoting proliferation of and suppressing apoptosis in GBM cells both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, MiR-196a exerted its oncogenic effect in GBM. We further confirmed that miR-196a was upregulated in clinical GBM specimens and that high levels of miR-196a were significantly correlated with shorter overall survival time in a large cohort of GBM patients. Our results from human tumor xenografts in nude mice indicated that inhibition of miR-196a could ameliorate tumor growth in vivo. Thus, our findings support the potential role of miR-196a in GBM and may serve as a potential therapeutic target for GBM.

Upregulation of miR-196a has been observed in gastric, pancreatic, esophageal, and breast cancers, and strong expression of miR-196a is also associated with a poor prognosis in gastric, pancreatic, and breast cancer patients.9,10,1517 MiR-196a and miR-196b were also correlated with the clinical outcome of GBM patients.11,18,19 Functional analysis revealed that high expression of miR-196a in esophageal, breast, and endometrial cancer cells promoted proliferation and inhibited apoptosis by directly targeting Annexin A1 (ANXA1).20 In gastric cancer, overexpression of miR-196a could contribute to carcinogenesis in vitro and in vivo by suppression of p27kip1.8 However, it has recently been reported that miR-196a has exerted opposite effects in different tumors. For instance, miR-196a is significantly downregulated in melanoma, and overexpression of miR-196a inhibited invasion and metastasis in melanoma and breast cancer cells by suppression of HOX-C8.21,22 In our study, miR-196a could promote proliferation and suppress apoptosis by directly inhibiting IκBα in GBM cells.

It is worth noting that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in sequences of miR-196a-2 may contribute to cancer susceptibility and prognosis. These genetic polymorphisms may affect the expression of mature miR-196a. For example, rs11614913 CC or carrying at least one C allele was significantly correlated with high levels of mature miR-196a.23,24 Presence of any variant allele in hsa-miR-196a-2 (rs11614913, C→T) was significantly associated with a reduced risk for lung, liver, breast, and head and neck cancers.2529 Similarly, SNPs of miR-196a are also closely related to prognosis in glioma.30 These suggest that the presence of mir-196a-2 SNPs may be a reason for abnormal expression of miR-196a in gliomas.

IκBα tightly controls NF-κB activation, which binds and tethers NF-κB in the cytoplasm.31 In the classical pathway of NF-kB activation, phosphorylation and degradation of IκBα activates NF-κB complex, a p50-p65 heterodimer that then translocates into the nucleus where it activates a variety of NF-κB target genes31,32 such as apoptosis-related genes Bax and Bcl-2.33,34 Subsequently, Bax and Bcl-2 regulate activation of caspase-3.35,36 In this study, we observed that miR-196a-induced inhibition of IκBα could cause changes of Bax, Bcl-2, and caspase-3. Actually, decreased IκBα expression was frequently observed in various neoplasms, and IκBα is a key regulator of cell adhesion, migration, and cell polarity. For example, increased expression of IκBα predicted improved response and survival in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients after treatment.37 Recently, Bredel et al revealed that overexpression of IκBα can inhibit GBM cell growth, migration, and colony formation and reduce cell viability.14 Jiang et al. also reported that suppression of IκBα promoted glioma cell invasiveness by upregulation of microRNA-30e*.38 Our results demonstrated that IκBα directly interacted with miR-196a, subsequently inhibiting IκBα expression, which promoted proliferation of and suppressed apoptosis in GBM cells in vitro assays and in a xenotransplantation model. This study provides the mechanistic basis for miR-196a biologic effects on GBM.

The present study has several limitations. We only demonstrated the oncogenic effect of miR-196a in GBM. However, we have not applied this study to the anaplastic and low grade of astrocytomas. Recently, Guan et al. demonstrated that the expression levels of miR-196a were higher in GBM as compared with those in anaplastic astrocytoma and that GBM patients with high expression levels of miR-196a had significantly shorter survival periods.11 Thus, it indicated that miR-196a may play a role in the malignant progression of gliomas. In addition, we observed that miR-196a expression was high in a small percentage of GBM specimens in our study, suggesting that some other major factors may contribute to GBM development and prognosis. For example, we previously demonstrated that EGFR amplification and miR-106a and MIB-1 expressions were also significant predictors in GBM patients.39 Moreover, the clinical implications of other important factors, such as mutations of the p53 gene, promotor hypermethylation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, and mutations of IDH genes, have been demonstrated in GBM patients.40,41

In conclusion, we presented the first evidence that miR-196a could promote proliferation of and suppress apoptosis in GBM by inhibition of IκBα both in vitro and in vivo. This study further confirmed that aberrant expression of miR-196a is a common event in GBM. Hence, our results provide new insights into the pathogenesis of GBM and indicate that miR-196a may predict clinical outcome of GBM patients and serve as a new therapeutic target for GBM.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available online at Neuro-Oncology (http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/).

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundations of China [81302178; 81272788]; Natural Science Foundations of Heilongjiang [QC2013C096]; the Fund of the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University [2013B01].

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Yuandong Dong, Department of Neurosurgery, for data collection.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

References

  • 1.Purow B, Schiff D. Advances in the genetics of glioblastoma: are we reaching critical mass? Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5(8):419–426. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Park JK, Hodges T, Arko L, et al. Scale to predict survival after surgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(24):3838–3843. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.0582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kong YW, Ferland-McCollough D, Jackson TJ, et al. microRNAs in cancer management. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(6):e249–e258. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70073-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yang G, Zhang R, Chen X, et al. MiR-106a inhibits glioma cell growth by targeting E2F1 independent of p53 status. J Mol Med (Berl) 2011;89(10):1037–1050. doi: 10.1007/s00109-011-0775-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ma X, Yoshimoto K, Guan Y, et al. Associations between microRNA expression and mesenchymal marker gene expression in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14(9):1153–1162. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen C, Zhang Y, Zhang L, et al. MicroRNA-196: critical roles and clinical applications in development and cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15(1):14–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01219.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang K, Li J, Guo H, et al. MiR-196a binding-site SNP regulates RAP1A expression contributing to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk and metastasis. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(11):2147–2154. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sun M, Liu XH, Li JH, et al. MiR-196a is upregulated in gastric cancer and promotes cell proliferation by downregulating p27(kip1) Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(4):842–852. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bloomston M, Frankel WL, Petrocca F, et al. MicroRNA expression patterns to differentiate pancreatic adenocarcinoma from normal pancreas and chronic pancreatitis. JAMA. 2007;297(17):1901–1908. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.17.1901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Niinuma T, Suzuki H, Nojima M, et al. Upregulation of miR-196a and HOTAIR Drive Malignant Character in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Cancer Res. 2012;72(5):1126–1136. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guan Y, Mizoguchi M, Yoshimoto K, et al. MiRNA-196 is upregulated in glioblastoma but not in anaplastic astrocytoma and has prognostic significance. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(16):4289–4297. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang J, Song Y, Zhang Y, et al. Cardiomyocyte overexpression of miR-27b induces cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction in mice. Cell Res. 2012;22(3):516–527. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu Q, Jin H, Yang Z, et al. MiR-150 promotes gastric cancer proliferation by negatively regulating the pro-apoptotic gene EGR2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;392(3):340–345. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.12.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bredel M, Scholtens DM, Yadav AK, et al. NFKBIA deletion in glioblastomas. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(7):627–637. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1006312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tsai KW, Liao YL, Wu CW, et al. Aberrant expression of miR-196a in gastric cancers and correlation with recurrence. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2012;51(4):394–401. doi: 10.1002/gcc.21924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hui AB, Shi W, Boutros PC, et al. Robust global micro-RNA profiling with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues. Lab Invest. 2009;89(5):597–606. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2009.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Maru DM, Singh RR, Hannah C, et al. MicroRNA-196a is a potential marker of progression during Barrett's metaplasia-dysplasia-invasive adenocarcinoma sequence in esophagus. Am J Pathol. 2009;174(5):1940–1948. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ma R, Yan W, Zhang G, et al. Upregulation of miR-196b confers a poor prognosis in glioblastoma patients via inducing a proliferative phenotype. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lakomy R, Sana J, Hankeova S, et al. MiR-195, miR-196b, miR-181c, miR-21 expression levels and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation status are associated with clinical outcome in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(12):2186–2190. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02092.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Luthra R, Singh RR, Luthra MG, et al. MicroRNA-196a targets annexin A1: a microRNA-mediated mechanism of annexin A1 downregulation in cancers. Oncogene. 2008;27(52):6667–6678. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li Y, Zhang M, Chen H, et al. Ratio of miR-196 s to HOXC8 messenger RNA correlates with breast cancer cell migration and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2010;70(20):7894–7904. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mueller DW, Bosserhoff AK. MicroRNA miR-196a controls melanoma-associated genes by regulating HOX-C8 expression. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(5):1064–1074. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hu Z, Chen J, Tian T, et al. Genetic variants of miRNA sequences and non-small cell lung cancer survival. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(7):2600–2608. doi: 10.1172/JCI34934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhan JF, Chen LH, Chen ZX, et al. A functional variant in microRNA-196a2 is associated with susceptibility of colorectal cancer in a Chinese population. Arch Med Res. 2011;42(2):144–148. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tian T, Shu Y, Chen J, et al. A functional genetic variant in microRNA-196a2 is associated with increased susceptibility of lung cancer in Chinese. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(4):1183–1187. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hoffman AE, Zheng T, Yi C, et al. microRNA miR-196a-2 and breast cancer: a genetic and epigenetic association study and functional analysis. Cancer Res. 2009;69(14):5970–5977. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Christensen BC, Avissar-Whiting M, Ouellet LG, et al. Mature microRNA sequence polymorphism in MIR196A2 is associated with risk and prognosis of head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(14):3713–3720. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hu Z, Liang J, Wang Z, et al. Common genetic variants in pre-microRNAs were associated with increased risk of breast cancer in Chinese women. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(1):79–84. doi: 10.1002/humu.20837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Akkiz H, Bayram S, Bekar A, et al. A functional polymorphism in pre-microRNA-196a-2 contributes to the susceptibility of hepatocellular carcinoma in a Turkish population: a case-control study. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18(7):e399–e407. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2010.01414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dou T, Wu Q, Chen X, et al. A polymorphism of microRNA196a genome region was associated with decreased risk of glioma in Chinese population. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136(12):1853–1859. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0844-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Viatour P, Merville MP, Bours V, et al. Phosphorylation of NF-kappaB and IkappaB proteins: implications in cancer and inflammation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005;30(1):43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Karin M, Cao Y, Greten FR, Li ZW. NF-kappaB in cancer: from innocent bystander to major culprit. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(4):301–310. doi: 10.1038/nrc780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tamatani M, Che YH, Matsuzaki H, et al. Tumor necrosis factor induces Bcl-2 and Bcl-x expression through NFkappaB activation in primary hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(13):8531–8538. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bentires-Alj M, Dejardin E, Viatour P, et al. Inhibition of the NF-kappa B transcription factor increases Bax expression in cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 2001;20(22):2805–2813. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Swanton E, Savory P, Cosulich S, et al. Bcl-2 regulates a caspase-3/caspase-2 apoptotic cascade in cytosolic extracts. Oncogene. 1999;18(10):1781–1787. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rossé T, Olivier R, Monney L, et al. Bcl-2 prolongs cell survival after Bax-induced release of cytochrome c. Nature. 1998;391(6666):496–499. doi: 10.1038/35160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bivona TG, Hieronymus H, Parker J, et al. FAS and NF-kappaB signalling modulate dependence of lung cancers on mutant EGFR. Nature. 2011;471(7339):523–526. doi: 10.1038/nature09870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jiang L, Lin C, Song L, et al. MicroRNA-30e* promotes human glioma cell invasiveness in an orthotopic xenotransplantation model by disrupting the NF-kappaB/IkappaBalpha negative feedback loop. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(1):33–47. doi: 10.1172/JCI58849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhao S, Yang G, Mu Y. MiR-106a is an independent prognostic marker in patients with glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(6):707–717. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jansen M, Yip S, Louis DN. Molecular pathology in adult gliomas: diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(7):717–726. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70105-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Weller M, Felsberg J, Hartmann C. Molecular predictors of progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a prospective translational study of the German Glioma Network. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(34):5743–5750. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES