Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 14.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2009 Dec 1;48(47):11312–11318. doi: 10.1021/bi901154t

The pH-dependent configurations of a 5-Chlorouracil-Guanine Base Pair

Jacob A Theruvathu 1, Cherine H Kim 1, Agus Darwanto 1, Jonathan W Neidigh 1, Lawrence C Sowers 1,*
PMCID: PMC3985288  NIHMSID: NIHMS158337  PMID: 19863157

Abstract

Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) from activated neutrophils at sites of inflammation can react with and damage biological molecules including nucleic acids. The reaction of HOCl with cytosine analogs can generate multiple products including 5-chlorouracil (ClU). In this paper, we have constructed oligonucleotides containing ClU paired opposite guanine (ClU-G). Melting studies indicate that oligonucleotide duplexes containing the ClU-G mispair are substantially less stable than those containing a ClU-A base pair. The melting temperature of the ClU-G mispair is not experimentally distinguishable from G-T. NMR studies indicate that the ClU-G base pair adopts a wobble geometry at neutral pH, similar to a T-G mispair. The exchangeable protons of the ClU-G mispair broaden rapidly with increasing temperature, indicating that the ClU-G mispair is less stable and opens more easily than the surrounding adjacent base pairs. Unlike the ClU-A base pair studied previously (Biochemistry 48, 7539–46, 2009), the ClU-G mispair undergoes a pH-dependent structural change, assuming an ionized base pair configuration that approximates a Watson-Crick base pair at higher pH. Ionization of ClU in a DNA template could promote mispair formation and mutation, in accord with previous studies on other 5-halouracil analogs. The electron-withdrawing 5-chloro substituent facilities ionization of the ClU N3 proton, promoting mispair formation, but it also renders the glycosidic bond susceptible to base cleavage by DNA repair glycosylases.


Reactive molecules generated by cells of the innate immune system, including neutrophils and eosinophils, are known to react with lipids, proteins and nucleic acids (15). While highly reactive molecules, including hypochlorous acid (HOCl), have potent antimicrobial activity, these reactive species can also cause collateral damage to host molecules. Emerging evidence indicates that HOCl-mediated damage is frequently found at sites of inflammation suggesting a potential connection between inflammation and the development of human disease, including cancer (6).

The reaction of HOCl with cytosine generates an array of products (7), including 5-chlorocytosine (ClC) and 5-chlorouracil (ClU). If the initial reaction occurred with a cytosine residue in a G-C base pair, the result could be a ClU-G mispair (Figure 1a). Base pairs in DNA containing ClU can also result from the incorporation of ClU-containing nucleotides generated by the reaction of HOCl with nucleotide pools (811).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Pathway for HOCl mediated conversion of C-G to ClU-G mispair, A. Normal C-G base pair. B. Dihydrocytosine intermediate formed from the addition of HOCl to cytosine. C. Conversion of dihydrocytosine to dihydrouracil intermediate. D. The ClU-G mispair formed by dehydration. (b) The 12mer oligonucleotide used for the study, X= 5-chlorouracil.

In a recent study, we examined the configuration and stability of a base pair containing ClU paired with adenine in a model synthetic oligonucleotide duplex (12). The configuration of the ClU-A base pair was similar to that of a normal T-A base pair; however, it was slightly more thermally and thermodynamically stable. The linewidth of the ClU imino proton did not increase with increasing solution pH. Although the ClU imino proton is more acidic than the corresponding thymine (T) imino proton, the absence of pH-dependent line-broadening at pH values well above the pKa of CldU (5-chloro-2'-deoxyuridine) was attributed to the formation of a stronger hydrogen bond with the opposing adenine residue and an indicator that the N3 proton was needed for the formation of the ClU-A base pair. The inability of a repair glycosylase to remove ClU when paired with A was attributed to the apparent stability of the ClU-A base pair, suggesting that ClU when paired with A might be a persistent lesion in DNA.

Previous studies have examined oligonucleotide duplexes containing analogous 5-fluorouracil (FU) and 5-bromouracil (BrU) mispairs with guanine. The FU-G (13) and BrU-G (14) mispairs have been shown to be in a wobble geometry at neutral pH both by NMR and, in the case of BrU-G, by crystallography in a duplex that assumed a Z-DNA structure (15). With increasing pH, the FU-G and BrU-G mispairs were shown to undergo a pH-dependent transition with formation of an ionized base pair in a geometry that approximated a Watson-Crick base pair (13,14). The capacity of the halouracil-G mispairs to undergo a pH-dependent transition was attributed to the electron-withdrawing property of the 5-halo substituent, which is opposite to that of the thymine 5-methyl group. Subsequent studies from the Goodman laboratory (16) demonstrated that the mispairing of the halouracil could be increased by increasing solution pH, consistent with the ionized base pair model (17,18).

The pKa of the 2'-deoxynucleoside analogs of FU, ClU, BrU and thymine are 7.7, 7.9, 8.0 and 9.7, respectively (19,20). The 5-chloro substituent, like the analogous fluoro and bromo substituents, facilitates ionization of the pyrimidine ring N3 proton and destabilizes the glycosidic bond, promoting glycosylase repair (2126). Although FU and BrU are similar with respect to the inductive properties of the 5-substituent, the biological properties are distinct. Derivatives of FU are highly toxic (27,28). BrU is mutagenic although mammalian cell grown in culture can tolerate substantial substitution of T with BrU (29,30).

The distinct properties of FU and BrU are likely due in part to the size of the 5-substituent. The smaller size of fluorine allows 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine-5'-monophosphate to mimic 2'-deoxyuridine-5'-monophosphate and poison thymidylate synthase. When in DNA, FU is also readily removed by all members of the uracilglycosyase family of repair enzymes (2126). In contrast, BrU can replace T in facilitating the binding of sequence-specific DNA-protein interactions (31,32). BrU residues are repaired only by a subset of uracil glycosylases and usually only when mispaired with G (2126).

The size of the 5-substituent of ClU is intermediate in size between fluorine and bromine, predicting that in some cases ClU would mimic FU, but in other cases be more similar to BrU. Among the 5-halouracils, ClU would be the most likely formed under endogenous conditions. The incorporation of ClU into DNA is known to cause chromosomal aberrations, cellular senescence and toxicity by as yet incompletely understood mechanisms (3336). Recent studies indicating the formation of ClU as a by-product of inflammation damage (16) bring new significance to understanding the properties of ClU. In this paper, we describe the results of studies with synthetic oligonucleotides in which ClU has been placed opposite G. We report the impact of this substitution on oligonucleotide stability and conformation.

Materials and methods

Oligonucleotide synthesis

Commercially available 2'-deoxyuridine was converted to CldU using the method of Kumar et al. (37). The corresponding phosphoramidite of CldU was prepared by standard methods, as previously described (36). All other phosphoramidites were obtained from Glen Research (Sterling, VA). Oligonucleotide synthesis was conducted with an Expedite synthesizer from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Oligonucleotides containing CldU were deprotected with concentrated aqueous ammonia at room temperature for 24 h.

The sequence of the 12-mer oligonucleotide examined here is shown in Figure 1b. Oligonucleotides were purified by two rounds of HPLC, first with the dimethoxytrityl (DMT) group on, and the second with the DMT group off. Oligonucleotides were examined by MALDI-TOF-MS (38) and the free base composition was verified by GC/MS following acid hydrolysis (39).

Oligonucleotide UV Melting studies

The melting temperature (Tm) and thermodynamic values of the oligonucleotide was obtained as previously described (4042) using a Varian Bio 300 Cary UV-vis spectrophotometer (Palo Alto, CA). The self complementary oligonucleotide at various concentrations (2 µM to 60 µM) was dissolved in a buffer containing 100 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM sodium phosphate at pH 7. The sample was then treated with a thermal cycle from 10 °C to 90 °C at an interval of 0.5 °C. The thermodynamic values are obtained from the average of five such temperature cycles. Tm values are reported at 28 µM total strand concentration (Table 1). Melting temperatures were also obtained from pH 7 to pH 11.

Table 1.

Tm and thermodynamic parameters of the oligonucleotide, 5’-d[CGXGAATTCYCG]-3’ (X= pyrimidine, Y= purine) at 10 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.0. The values for ClU-A are from reference 12.

Oligo Tm @ 28 µM
(°C)
ΔH°
(kcal/mol)
ΔS°
(cal/mol/k)
ΔG° (25 °C)
(kcal/mol)
T-G 42.2 ± 0.2 −90.0 ± 3.7 −264 ±12 −9.7 ± 0.2
ClU-G 41.8 ±0.2 −86.7 ± 3.8 −254 ± 12 −9.5 ± 0.2
ClU-A 55.6 ± 0.3 −81 ± 14 −234 ± 4 −12.2 ±1.0

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR)

NMR spectra were obtained with a 500 MHz Bruker NMR system (Billerica, MA.). The proton NMR spectra of the oligonucleotide were taken in a solution containing 10% D2O, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate and 0.2 mM EDTA at pH 7.0 and compared with results from similar sequences published by other laboratories (4345). The oligonucleotide (200 A260 OD units, 2.5 mM) was annealed at 86 °C for 2 min and slowly cooled prior to acquisition of NMR spectra. Each spectrum was calibrated using DSS (4,4-dimetyl-4-silapentane-1-sulphonate) as an internal standard reference. Proton NMR spectra of oligonucleotides in 90% H2O were acquired with a water suppression double gradient echo WATERGATE W5 pulse program (46). The temperature of the sample was controlled by a variable temperature monitor (Eurotherm, BVT 3000) from Bruker.

A typical spectrum was acquired with a binomial water suppression delay (d19) of 160 µsec which optimized water suppression. Since the delay (d19) of 160 µsec affected some of the imino resonances near 11 ppm, it was changed to 40 µsec when we examined the imino protons. The null point repetition was every 6.25 ppm from the suppression point when the d19 was 160 µsec. When the delay (d19) was 40 µsec, the null point repetition was far from any of the imino proton resonances. The line width studies were performed using the d19 delay of 40 µsec. The 2D NOE spectra were acquired using a mixing time of 300 ms unless otherwise indicated.

Results

Commercially available 2'-deoxyuridine was converted to 5-chloro-2'-deoxyuridine (37) and then converted to the corresponding 5'-dimethyoxytrityl-3'-cyanoethyl-diisopropylaminophosphoramidite (36). The phosphoramidite analog of ClU was incorporated into a self-complementary synthetic oligonucleotide using standard solid phase methods. In the sequence prepared for this study, the ClU residue was paired opposite guanine (Figure 1b).

Oligonucleotides containing ClU were synthesized, deprotected and purified using standard conditions, except that deprotection was conducted in concentrated aqueous ammonia at room temperature for 24 h. Due to the high natural abundance of both 35Cl and 37Cl isotopes, the mass spectrum of chlorine-containing molecules has a significant M+2 line for the parent and M-methyl ions. Intact oligonucleotides were also examined by MALDI-TOF-MS. The isotope envelope of larger molecules can also be simulated (38); the presence of one chlorine atom in the oligonucleotide profoundly impacts the shape of the isotope envelope. The simulated ion cluster of an oligonucleotide of composition C116H145N45O71P11Cl matches the experimental spectrum (Figure S1a). The base composition of each oligonucleotide was verified by GC/MS following acid hydrolysis (Figure S1b)

The thermal stability of the oligonucleotide duplex (4042) containing ClU was examined and compared with that of an oligonucleotide containing T. The melting temperature at pH 7 of the ClU-G-containing oligonucleotide was observed to be 41.8 ± 0.2°C, while that of the oligonucleotide containing T-G was 42.2 ± 0.2°C. Thermodynamic parameters obtained are shown in Table 1. The thermal melting profiles of the T and ClU-containing oligonucleotides are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Oligonucleotide melting profiles examined by temperature dependent absorbance at 260 nm. UV melting profiles (normalized) of 12mer oligonucleotide at 28 µM concentration in a buffer containing 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 0.1 mM EDTA at pH 7.0.T-G (solid line), ClU-G (dashed line) and ClU-A (dotted line, from reference 12).

Proton NMR spectra of the non-exchangeable protons of each duplex were obtained and shown in Figure 3. Proton resonances were assigned by standard 2D methods (47) and assignments are provided in Table S1. The corresponding 2D spectra for the duplexes containing the T-G and ClU-G mispairs are shown as Figures S2 and S3. The observed proton connectivities indicate that both the T-G and ClU-G duplexes are predominantly in a B-form geometry and all bases are intrahelical. The H6 proton for T3 of the T-G oligonucleotide is observed at 7.18 ppm, whereas the corresponding H6 proton of the ClU residue of the ClU-G duplex is observed at 7.70 ppm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

1H NMR spectra of the T-G (top) and ClU-G (bottom) oligonucleotide in the aromatic region. The H6/H8 and H2 assignments are written in the top spectrum. ClU3 of ClU-G oligo is indicated by the arrow mark in the bottom panel. The spectra were taken at 27 °C with 256 scans using a water suppression WATERGATE program with binomial water suppression delay (d19) of 160 µsec. The oligonucleotide was dissolved in a buffer containing 10% D2O, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 0.2 mM EDTA at pH 7.

Proton spectra of the exchangeable proton resonances were obtained in 90% H2O, 10% D2O, and the spectra of the T-G and ClU-G duplexes are shown in Figure 4. Proton resonances were assigned by standard 2D methods, as described above. The 2D NOESY spectra of the exchangeable proton region for the T-G and ClU-G oligonucleotides are shown as Figures S4 and S5, respectively. The NOEs observed in Figures S4 and S5 between T3 or ClU3, respectively, and G10 imino protons are consistent with these mispairs being in a wobble base pair geometry. The resonance assignments are provided in Table S3. The N3 imino proton of T3 of the T-G oligonucleotide was observed at 11.75 ppm and for ClU3 of the ClU-G oligonucleotide at 12.25 ppm. Other than chemical shift differences between protons in the T-G and ClU-G mispairs, all chemical shifts in the other base pairs were the same (± 0.02 ppm).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

1H NMR spectrum of the T-G (top) and ClU-G (bottom) oligonucleotides in the imino region. The spectra were taken at 5 °C with 256 scans using a water suppression WATERGATE program with binomial water suppression delay (d19) of 40 µsec. The oligonucelotide was dissolved in a buffer containing 10% D2O, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 0.2 mM EDTA at pH 6.

The imino protons of the ClU-G mispair broaden more rapidly with increasing temperature than the corresponding imino protons of the T-G mispair as shown in Figure 5. The 1D spectra for the data plotted in Figure 5 are shown as Figures S6 and S7. The magnitude of the imino proton-water crosspeaks in the 2D NOESY spectra for the ClU-G mispair are substantially greater than those for the T-G mispair (Figure S8). Potential base pair configurations are shown in Figure 6 and are discussed below.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Line widths of imino protons as a function of temperature at pH 6. (a) T-G oligo (b) ClU-G oligo. The spectra were taken with 256 scans using a water suppression WATERGATE program with binomial water suppression delay (d19) of 40 µsec. The oligonucleotide was dissolved in a buffer containing 10% D2O, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 0.2 mM EDTA.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Possible base pairing configurations of the ClU-G mispair.

With increasing solution pH, the imino protons of the mispaired T-G and ClU-G bases broaden rapidly and are lost from the spectrum at pH 9. (Figure S9). The chemical shifts of nonexchangeable protons of bases above and below the mismatched ClU-G base pair move as a function of solution pH (Figure 7 and Figure S11). The apparent midpoint of the pH-dependent transition for the ClU-G mispair is approximately 8.75. As the pH increases, the G4 imino proton resonance shifts upfield from 12.95 to 12.45 ppm as the ClU-G base pair approaches pseudo Watson-Crick geometry. A cross peak is observed in the 2D NOESY at 12.45 and 12.95 for the G4 imino proton due to chemical exchange (Figure S10). No pH dependent transition is observed for the T-G mispair prior to alkaline denaturation of the helix. The observed melting temperatures of the ClU-A and ClU-G duplexes as a function of solution pH are shown in Figure 8. No apparent change in helix thermal stability is observed in the region of the apparent pKa of the ClU-G mispair.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

1H NMR chemical shift study of ClU-G oligo as a function of pH at room temperature. pH dependent chemical shift of (a) H8 protons of G4 and G10 and (b) H6 proton of C9 and C11. The oligonucleotide was dissolved in a buffer containing 10% D2O, 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 0.2 mM EDTA.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Tm of ClU-G and ClU-A oligo at different pH values. The values are obtained at a total strand concentration of 6.0 µM and a buffer containing 100 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 0.1 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid.

Discussion

DNA can be damaged by reactive molecules derived from activated neutrophils and eosinophils at sites of inflammation forming ClU and BrU, respectively (15,30). Oxidized and halogenated pyrimidines, including ClU are among the multiple damage products (Figure 1a). DNA damage products derived from reactive oxygen and halogen species might provide a mechanistic link between inflammation and human diseases including cancer (6).

The 5-halogenated analogs of 2'-deoxyuridine can be metabolized to the triphosphate derivatives and incorporated into polynucleotides by polymerases. The FU analogs also serve as potent chemotherapy agents, in part due to their capacity to inhibit the synthesis of the normal DNA precursor, TTP (27,28). While the halouracils are best known as synthetic analogs (31,32) useful in biochemical and pharmacological studies, ClU derivatives, and to a lesser extent BrU derivatives could be formed endogenously in the tissue of higher organisms. Derivatives of ClU can be incorporated into the DNA of replicating cells (811). Furthermore, ClU has been shown to induce cellular toxicity, cause senescence, and increase the frequency of sister-chromatid exchanges (3336). It has been proposed that the toxicity might, in part, be attributed to interference with nucleotide metabolism, which promotes dUTP misincorporation and repair by a mechanism similar to that proposed for FU (36). However, the mechanism of sister chromatid exchange remains to be resolved.

Recently, we have incorporated ClU into synthetic oligonucleotides to determine its base-pairing configuration when paired opposite adenine and to examine the impact of ClU-A substitution on the stability of an oligonucleotide duplex (12). We observed that oligonucleotides containing ClU-A were slightly more stable than the control oligonucleotides containing a T-A base pair. The ClU-A base pair is predominantly in a geometry that approximates a Watson-Crick base pair and the duplex containing the ClU-A base pairs was B-form.

In this study, we examined the stability and base pair configuration of a duplex containing a ClU-G mispair (Figure 2). The data obtained was compared with a corresponding duplex containing a T-G mispair. The ClU-G duplex has the same thermal stablility, within experimental error, as the corresponding T-G duplex. Both mispairs are substantially less stable that the ClU-A duplex (12). Melting temperatures and thermodynamic parameters are recorded in Table 1 and representative melting curves are shown in Figure 2.

Proton NMR spectra were recorded for the ClU-G and T-G containing duplexes under the same experimental conditions of temperature and neutral pH. The downfield shift of the ClU3 H6 proton relative to the T3 H6 proton by 0.53 ppm is attributed to the opposing inductive properties of the 5-methyl and 5-chloro substituents. A shift of similar magnitude (0.52 ppm) was observed for the corresponding T-A and ClU-A duplexes (12). The nonexchangeable proton connectivities indicate that all bases are intrahelical. The observed chemical shifts of the H6 protons of T3 and ClU3 indicate that the pyrimidines of both the T-G and ClU-G mispairs are predominantly in their neutral, keto tautomeric forms at neutral pH (48).

Exchangeable proton resonances were observed for each base pair in both the T-G and ClU-G duplexes (Figure 4). Two imino proton resonances are observed for each mispair, shifted upfield from the normal imino proton region as is characteristic of wobble mispairs (4951). The exchangeable and nonexchangeable proton NMR data indicate that the bases of both the ClU-G mispair and the T-G mispair are paired with one another in a wobble configuration as shown in Figure 6a.

With increasing temperature, the exchangeable resonances of the ClU-G mispair broaden rapidly and are lost from the spectrum prior to thermal denaturation of the duplex (Figure 5b and Figures S6 and S7). The rapid broadening of the ClU-G imino protons distinguished the ClU-G and T-G mispairs in that the imino protons of the T-G mispair broaden only as the remainder of the helix is thermally denatured (Figure 5a). The magnitude of the crosspeaks in our NOESY spectra between the ClU-G imino proton resonances and water are 3–4 times larger than those of the T-G mispair at equal mixing time suggesting that the enhanced broadening of the ClU-G imino protons is by exchange with water (Figure S8). The ClU base of the ClU-G mispair (Figure 6A) could move, allowing the ClU imino proton to be exposed to solvent (Figure 6B). The acidic ClU N3 proton could then exchange with water by ionization of the ClU residue (Figure 6C). The ionized ClU residue could then regain a proton and return to the neutral wobble (Figure 6B to 6A) or remain ionized and form two hydrogen bonds with G (Figure 6D)

A distinguishing feature of ClU, relative to T, is that the 5-chloro substituent of ClU is electron-withdrawing whereas the T methyl group is electron donating. The electronic-inductive property of a 5-substituted uracil analog significantly impacts the pKa of the N3 proton. The pKa of CldU is reported to be 7.9 whereas the pKa of the corresponding thymidine N3 proton is 9.7 (19,21). Previously, both the FU-G (13) and BrU-G (14) mispairs were shown to undergo a pH-dependent structural transition. The pKa of FdU is reported to be 7.7 (19), whereas the pKa when paired with G is 8.3 (13). Similarly, the pKa of BrdU is 8.0 (19) and the pKa of BrU when mispaired with G is 8.6 (14). We therefore examined the ClU-G duplex as a function of solution pH. As shown in Figure 7 and Figure S11, multiple protons within the duplex undergo pH-dependent changes in chemical shift. The H6 proton of the ClU residue begins to shift upfield, broaden, and is lost from the spectrum by pH 7.9 as it moves beneath other nonexchangeable resonances (Figure S11).

The pKa of CldU is 7.9 (19) whereas the pKa in the ClU-G mispair observed here shifted to 8.7. The increase in the apparent pKa for ClU when paired opposite G is similar in magnitude for the shifts in pKa seen for FU-G and BrU-G discussed above, and would correspond to a difference of approximately 1.0 kcal/mol at pH 7.4 and 25 °C (18). The thermal stability of the ClU-A and ClU-G duplexes was examined as a function of solution pH (Figure 8). The observed Tm for each duplex drops with increasing solution pH, as would be expected for alkaline-induced denaturation. No unusual pH-dependent change in duplex stability is observed in the region of pH 8.7 for the ClU-G duplex, indicating that the ionized configuration of the ClU-G duplex (pKa 8.7) does not destabilize the duplex.

Upon the basis of the pH-dependent change from neutral to wobble to ionized pseudo-Watson-Crick configuration, we would anticipate that the base-pairing properties of ClU when in DNA would be pH dependent, as has been demonstrated for the FU and BrU bases (16,18,20). As the pH increases, we would anticipate more mispair formation. Several recent studies have indicated that base pair geometry is one of the primary properties that govern base selection by DNA polymerase (5254). Increased miscoding with increasing pH has been observed for the FU and BrU bases, as well as the thymine oxidation damage product, 5-formyluracil (55). The increased miscoding potential is attributed to an electron-withdrawing substituent in the 5-position (20).

The capacity of a base analog to induce mutation in a replicating cell would increase with its capacity to miscode, but decrease with increasing efficiency of repair. In in vitro systems, both FU and BrU have similar miscoding potential; however, BrU is a known mutagenic base analog whereas FU is considered to be only weakly or non-mutagenic. Unlike BrU, FU is repaired by several members of the uracil glycosylase family (2126). The efficiency of FU repair is attributed to the small size of the 5-substituent and the electron-withdrawing property of the 5-substituent (2126). Although both bromine and fluorine substituents are electron-withdrawing and induce similar changes in the pKa values for the corresponding 5-substitued uracil derivatives, the larger size of the Br substituent prevents its removal by the major uracil glycosylase, UNG.

The repair of ClU is more similar to BrU than to FU. The ClU analog is repaired by SMUG1 and TDG, but not UNG. The efficiency of ClU repair is substantially greater when the ClU is mispaired with G than when paired with A (12). The difference in the repair of ClU-A versus ClU-G has been attributed to the reduced stability of the ClU-G mispair. The reduced stability of damaged or mispaired bases appears to be a common recognition mechanism for glycosylases (2126).

In accord with our previous results with the ClU-A base pair (12), ClU incorporated as a dNTP analog would be expected to pair predominantly with template A. As a stable base resistant to glycosylase removal (12), ClU-A could be a persistent DNA lesion. When templates containing ClU are replicated, it would potentially miscode with G at a higher frequency than T due to its increased propensity to form an ionized base pair in pseudo-Watson-Crick geometry, in accord with previous studies with BrU, FU and 5-formyluracil (16,55). Once formed, however, the ClU of a ClU-G mispair would be a target for repair by members of the uracil glycosylase family (12). The ClU of the mispair would be targeted for glycosylase removal, leaving the incorrect G in the opposing strand to serve as the template for repair synthesis. Upon the basis of these properties, the formation of ClU in the nucleotide pool could prove highly mutagenic.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Abbreviations

HOCl

hypochlorous acid

ClC

5- chlorocytosine

ClU

5-chlorouracil

CldU

5-chloro-2'-deoxyuridine

DMT

dimethoxytrityl

GC/MS

gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

MALDI-TOF-MS

matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry

DSS

4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulphonate

Tm

melting temperature

EDTA

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

NOE

nuclear overhauser effect

FU

5-fluorouracil

BrU

5-bromouracil

TTP

thymidine triphosphate

dUTP

2'- deoxyuridine-5'-triphosphate

UNG

uracil – DNA glycosylase

SMUG1

single strand selective monofunctional uracil – DNA glycosylase

TDG

thymine – DNA glycosylase

T

Thymine

Footnotes

This work is supported by grants from the National Institute of Health.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION AVAILABLE Additional experimental data includes two tables of NMR chemical shifts, the mass spectral characterization of the ClU-G oligonucleotide, and 10 figures showing 1D and 2D NMR spectra. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Henderson JP, Byun J, Takeshita J, Heineke JW. Phagocytes produce 5-chlorouracil and 5-bromouracil, two mutagenic products of myeloperoxidase, in human inflammatory tissue. J. Biol Chem. 2003;278:23522–23528. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303928200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jiang Q, Blount BC, Ames BN. 5-Chlorouracil, a marker of DNA damage from hypochlorous acid during inflammation- A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry assay. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:32834–32840. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304021200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Takeshita J, Byun J, Nhan TQ, Pritchard DK, Pennathur S, Schwartz SM, Chait A, Heineke JW. Myeloperoxidase generates 5-chlorouracil in human atherosclerotic tissue - a potential pathway for somatic mutagenesis by macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:3096–3104. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509236200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Knaapen AM, Güngör N, Schins RP, Borm PJ, Van Schooten FJ. Neutrophils and respiratory tract DNA damage and mutagenesis: a review. Mutagenesis. 2006;21:225–236. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gel032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Whiteman M, Jenner A, Halliwell B. Hypochlorous acid-induced base modifications in isolated calf thymus DNA. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997;10:1240–1246. doi: 10.1021/tx970086i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Valinluck V, Sowers LC. Inflammation-mediated cytosine damage: A mechanistic link between inflammation and the epigenetic alterations in human cancers. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5583–5586. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kang JI, Sowers LC. Examination of hypochlorous acid-induced damage to cytosine residues in a CpG dinucleotide in DNA. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008;21:1211–1218. doi: 10.1021/tx800037h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Visser DW, Frisch DM, Huang B. Synthesis of 5-chlorodeoxyuridine and a comparative study of 5-halodeoxyuridines inE. coli . Biochem. Pharmacol. 1960;5:157–164. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(60)90017-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jaunin F, Visser AE, Cmarko D, Aten JA, Fakan S. A new immunocytochemical technique for ultrastructural analysis of DNA replication in proliferating cells after application of two halogenated deoxyuridine. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1998;46:1203–1209. doi: 10.1177/002215549804601014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Svetlova M, Solovjeva L, Blasius M, Shevelev I, Hubscher U, Hanawalt P, Tomilin N. Differential incorporation of halogenated deoxyuridines during UV-induced DNA repair synthesis in human cells. DNA Repair. 2005;4:359–366. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yamada K, Semba R, Ding X, Ma N, Nagahama M. Discrimination of cell nuclei in early S-phase, mid-to-late S-phase, and G2/M-phase by sequential administration of 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine and 5-chloro-2’-deoxyuridine. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2005;53:1365–1370. doi: 10.1369/jhc.4A6601.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Theruvathu JA, Kim CH, Rogstad DK, Neidigh JW, Sowers LC. Base-pairing configuration and stability of an oligonucleotide duplex containing a 5-chlorouracil-adenine base pair. Biochemistry. 2009;48:7539–7546. doi: 10.1021/bi9007947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sowers LC, Eritja R, Kaplan B, Goodman MF, Fazakerley GV. Equilibrium between a wobble and ionized base pair formed between fluorouracil and guanine in DNA as studied by proton and fluorine NMR. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:14794–14801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sowers LC, Goodman MF, Eritja R, Kaplan B, Fazakerley GV. Ionized and wobble base-pairing for bromouracil-guanine equilibrium under physiological conditions. A nuclear magnetic resonance study on an oligonucleotide containing a bromouracil-guanine base-pair as a function of pH. J. Mol. Biol. 1989;205:437–447. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90353-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brown T, Kneale G, Hunter WN, Kennard O. Structural characterization of the bromouracil-guanine base pair mismatch in a Z-DNA fragment. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14:1801–1809. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.4.1801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yu H, Eritja RE, Bloom LB, Goodman MF. Ionization of bromouracil and fluorouracil stimulates base mispairing frequencies with guanine. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:15935–15943. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lawley PD, Brookes P. Ionization of DNAbases or base analogs as a possible explanation of mutagenesis with special reference to 5-bromodeoxyuridine. J. Mol. Biol. 1962;4:216–219. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(62)80053-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.SowersLCShaw BR, Veigl ML, Sedwick WD. DNA base modification: Ionized base pairs and mutagenesis. Mutat. Res. 1987;177:201–218. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(87)90003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.La Francois CJ, Jang YH, Cagin T, Goddard WA, 3rd, Sowers LC. Conformation and proton configuration of pyrimidine deoxynucleoside oxidation damage products in water. Chem. Res. Toxiol. 2000;13:462–470. doi: 10.1021/tx990209u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Privat EJ, Sowers LC. A proposed mechanism for the mutagenicity of 5-formyluracil. Mutat. Res. 1996;354:151–156. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(96)00005-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu P, Burdzy A, Sowers LC. Substrate recognition by a family of uracil-DNA glycosylases: UNG, MUG and TDG. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2002;15:1001–1009. doi: 10.1021/tx020030a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu P, Burdzy A, Sowers LC. Repair of the Mutagenic DNA oxidation product, 5-formyluracil. DNA Repair. 2003;2:199–210. doi: 10.1016/s1568-7864(02)00198-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bennett MT, Rodgers MT, Hebert AS, Ruslander LE, Eisele L, Drohat AC. Specificity of human thymine DNA glycosylase depends on N-glycosidic bond stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:12510–12519. doi: 10.1021/ja0634829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Morgan MT, Bennett MT, Drohat AC. Excision of 5-halogenated uracils by human thymine DNA glycosylase. Robust activity for DNA contexts other than CpG. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:27578–27586. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704253200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu P, Theruvathu JA, Darwanto A, Lao VV, Pascal T, Goddard WA, 3rd, Sowers LC. Mechanism of base selection by the Escherichia coli mispaired uracil glycosylase. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:8829–8836. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707174200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Darwanto A, Theruvathu JA, Sowers JL, Rogstad DK, Pascal T, Goddard WA, 3rd, Sowers LC. Mechanism of base selection by human single-stranded selective monofunctional uracil-DNA-glycosylase. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:15835–15846. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807846200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Parker WB, Cheng YC. Metabolism and mechanism of action of 5-fluorouracil. Pharmacol. Ther. 1990;48:381–395. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(90)90056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wyatt MD, Wilson DM., 3rd Participation of DNA repair in the response to 5-fluorouracil. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2009;66:788–799. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8557-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sternglanz H, Bugg CE. Relationship between the mutagenic and base-stacking properties of halogenated uracil derivatives. The crystal structure of 5-chloro- and 5-bromouracil. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1975;378:1–11. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(75)90130-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Henderson JP, Byun J, Mueller DM, Heinecke JW. The eosinophil peroxidase-hydrogen peroxide-bromide system of human eosinophils generates 5-bromouraci, a mutagenic thymine analog. Biochemistry. 2001;40:2052–2059. doi: 10.1021/bi002015f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brennan CA, Van Cleve MD, Gumport RI. The effects of base analogue substitutions on the cleavage by the EcoR1 restriction endonuclease of octadeoxyribonucleotides containing modified EcoR1 recognition sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 1986;261:7270–7278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Petruska J, Horn D. Sequence-specific responses of restriction endonucleases to bromodeoxyuridine substitution in mammalian DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983;11:2495–2510. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.8.2495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Morris SM. the genetic toxicology of 5-fluoropyrimidines and 5-chlorouracil. Mutation Res. 1993;297:39–51. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(93)90006-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Michishita E, Kurahashi T, Suzuki T, Fukuda M, Fujii M, Hirano H, Ayusawa D. Changes in nuclear matrix proteins during senescence-like phenomenon induced by 5-chlorodeoxyuridine in HeLa cells. Experimental Gerontol. 2002;37:885–890. doi: 10.1016/s0531-5565(02)00033-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Heartlein MW, O’Neill JP, Pal BC, Preston RJ. The induction of specific-locus mutations and sister-chromatid exchanges by 5-bromo and 5-chlorodeoxyuridine. Mutat. Res. 1982;92:411–416. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(82)90239-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Brandon ML, Mi L-J, Chaung W, Teebor G, Boorstein RJ. 5-chloro-2'-deoxyuridine cytotoxicity results from base excision repair of uracil subsequent to thymidylate synthase inhibition. Mutat. Res. 2000;459:161–169. doi: 10.1016/s0921-8777(99)00061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kumar R, Wiebe LI, Knaus EE. A mild and efficient methodology for the synthesis of 5-halogeno uracil nucleosides that occur via a 5-halogeno-6-azido-5,6-dihydro intermediate. Can. J. Chem. 1994;72:2005–2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cui Z, Theruvathu JA, Farrel A, Burdzy A, Sowers LC. Characterization of synthetic oligonucleotides containing biologically important modified bases by matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 2008;379:196–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kang JI, Jr., Burdzy A, Liu P, Sowers LC. Synthesis and characterization of oligonucleotides containing 5-chlorocytosine. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2004;17:1236–1244. doi: 10.1021/tx0498962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Breslauer KJ, Frank R, Blocker H, Marky LA. Predicting DNA duplex stability from base sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1986;83:3746–3750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.SantaLucia J, Jr., Allawi HT, Seneviratne PA. Improved nearest-neighbor parameters for predicting DNA duplex stability. Biochemistry. 1996;35:3555–3562. doi: 10.1021/bi951907q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Allawi HT, SantaLucia J., Jr. Thermodynamics and NMR of internal G.T mismatches in DNA. Biochemistry. 1997;36:10581–10594. doi: 10.1021/bi962590c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Patel DJ, Kozlowski SA, Marky LA, Broka C, Rice JA, Itakura K, Breslauer KJ. Premelting and melting transitions in the d(CGCGAATTCGCG) self-complementary duplex in solution. Biochemistry. 1982;21:428–436. doi: 10.1021/bi00532a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hare DR, Wemmer DE, Chou SH, Drobny G, Reid BR. Assignment of the non-exchangeable proton resonances of d(C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G) using two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance methods. J. Mol. Biol. 1983;171:319–336. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90096-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Klevit RE, Wemmer DE, Reid BR. 1H NMR studies on the interaction between distamycin A and a symmetrical DNA dodecamer. Biochemistry. 1986;25:3296–3303. doi: 10.1021/bi00359a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu ML, Mao XA, Ye CH, Huang H, Nicholson JK, Lindon JC. Improved WATERGATE Pulse Sequences for Solvent Suppression in NMR Spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 1998;132:125–129. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Weiss MA, Patel DJ, Sauer RT, Karplus M. Two-dimensional 1H NMR study of the lambda operator site OL1: a sequential assignment strategy and its application. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1984;81:130–134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.1.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sowers LC, Fazakerley GV, Kim H, Dalton L, Goodman MF. Variation of nonexchangeable proton resonance chemical shifts as a probe of aberrant base pair formation in DNA. Biochemistry. 1986;25:3983–3988. doi: 10.1021/bi00362a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Patel DJ, Kozlowski SA, Marky LA, Rice JA, Broka C, Dallas J, Itakura K, Breslauer KJ. Structure, dynamics and energetics of deoxyguanosine . thymidine wobble base pair formation in the self-complementary d(CGTAATTCGC) duplex in solution. Biochemistry. 1982;21:437–444. doi: 10.1021/bi00532a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Carbonnaux C, Fazakerley GV, Sowers LC. An NMR study of deaminated base pairs in DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:4075–4081. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.14.4075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pardi A, Morden KM, Patel DJ, Tinoco I., Jr. Kinetics for exchange if imino protons in the d(C-G-C-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G) double helix and in two similar helicies that contain a G-T base pair, d(C-G-T-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G), and an extra adenine, d(C-G-C-A-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G) Biochemistry. 1982;21:6567–6574. doi: 10.1021/bi00268a038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Delaney JC, Henderson PT, Helquist SA, Morales JC, Essigmann JM, Kool ET. High-fidelity in vivo replication of DNA base shape mimics without hydrogen bonds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA. 2003;100:4469–4473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0837277100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Goodman MF. On the wagon-DNA polymerase joins "H-bonds anonymous". Nat. Biotechnol. 1999;17:640–641. doi: 10.1038/10852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Goodman MF. Hydrogen bonding revisited: geometric selection as a principle determinant of DNA replication fidelity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:10493–10495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yoshida M, Makino K, Morita H, Terato H, Ohyama Y, Ide H. Substrate and mispairing properties of 5-formyl-2'-deoxyuridine 5'-triphosphate assessed by in vitro DNA polymerase reactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:1570–1577. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.8.1570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES