Skip to main content
Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice logoLink to Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice
. 2014 Jan-Mar;5(1):23–24.

Commentary

Beatriz García-Rodríguez 1,
PMCID: PMC3985350  PMID: 24741244

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurological disorder characterized by gait impairments and walking deficits. These deficits are exacerbated when walking is performed concurrentwith another task, a circumstance commonly studied using the Dual-Task (DT) paradigm. Usually, the introduction of a secondary task is detrimental to the performance of the primary task, causing interference in its processing.

Although multiple factors may be responsible for this, the mechanisms underlying the interference during DT walking in PD remain unclear. Such interference may be produced by certain characteristics of the individual, such as by the type of concurrent tasks or by environmental conditions. Several studieshave foundinterference ofconcurrent motor[1] and cognitive[2,3] tasks in DT walking, though it is unclear whether motor or cognitive tasks have a stronger impact on DT walking in people with PD.

This issue of Journal of Neuroscience in Rural Practice includes a study titled “Effect of Type of Secondary Task on Cued Gait on People with Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease”.[4] The research carried out in this study aimed to compare the differential effects of concurrent motor and cognitive tasks on DT walking in people with PD. The findings suggest that the interference produced by cognitive tasks is stronger than that by motor tasks, and also provide empirical evidence of the relevance of cognition in the movement disorders associated with PD. The relevance of these results lies inthe empirical support theseprovide to the hypothesis that executive deficits characteristic of PD are caused by deficits in the ability to process information automatically, emphasizing that the control of walking is not automatic but, rather, appears to be mediated by cognitive functions.

Various hypotheses might explain the deficits in DT performance in PD patients. First, this difficulty could be caused by the motor requirements of each task. However, PD patients not only have difficulties when performingconcurrent motor and cognitive tasks, but also while performing two cognitive tasks. For example, PD patients have been found to have longer reaction times than controls when a Stroop task is executed simultaneously with a resource demanding task, indicating that PD patients have limited attentionalresources.[5] It was also suggested that multiple factors may be underlying DT interference in PD. First, the limited capacity of attentional resources is exceeded; second, PD patients perform such tasks less automatically than normal subjects; and third, central executive circuits may be affected in PD.[6 Accordingly, patients would appear to use more attentional resources for each of the simple tasks, which make it more difficult to simultaneously coordinate both tasks. While deficits in the simultaneousperformance of two motor tasks could be caused by sensorimotor interference,[7 for cognitive tasks, such interference might be caused by deficits in the central executive component responsible for distributing attentional resources.[8]

References

  • 1.Bond JM, Morris M. Goal-directed secondary motor tasks: Their effects on gait in subjects with Parkinson disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:110–6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90230-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Plotnik M, Dagan Y, Gurevich T, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. Effects of cognitive function on gait and dual tasking abilities in patients with Parkinson's disease suffering from motor response fluctuations. Exp Brain Res. 2011;208:169–79. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2469-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yogev G, Giladi N, Peretz C, Springer S, Simon ES, Hausdorff JM. Dual tasking, gait rhythmicity and Parkinson's disease: Whichaspects of gait areattentiondemanding? Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:1248–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04298.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chawla H, Walia S, Behari M, Noohu MM. Effect of type of secondary task on cued gait on people with idiopathic Parkinson's Disease. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2014:5.18–23. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.127865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown RG, Marsden CD. Dual task performance and processing resources in normal subjects and patients with Parkinson's disease. Brain. 1991;114:215–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu T, Hallett M. Dual Task Interference in Parkinson's disease. US Neurology. 2009;5:30–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Caligiuri MP, Heindel WC, Lohr JB. Sensorimotor disinhibition in Parkinson's disease: Effects of levodopa. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:53–8. doi: 10.1002/ana.410310110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dalrymple-Alford JC, Kalders AS, Jones RD, Watson RW. A central executive deficit in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:360–7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.3.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice are provided here courtesy of Scientific Scholar

RESOURCES