Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009 Dec 18;243(3):359–371. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.003

“PCB153-Elicited Hepatic Responses in the Immature, Ovariectomized C57BL/6 Mice: Comparative Toxicogenomic Effects of Dioxin and Non-Dioxin-Like Ligands”

Anna K Kopec a,b, Lyle D Burgoon a,b,c, Daher Ibrahim-Aibo b,d, Bryan D Mets a,b, Colleen Tashiro e, Dave Potter e, Bonnie Sharratt e, Jack R Harkema b,d, Timothy Zacharewski a,b,*
PMCID: PMC3987113  NIHMSID: NIHMS165422  PMID: 20005886

Abstract

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are ubiquitous contaminants found as complex mixtures of coplanar and non-coplanar congeners. The hepatic temporal and dose-dependent effects of the most abundant non-dioxin-like congener, 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB153), were examined in immature, ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice, and compared to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), the prototypical aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligand. Animals were gavaged once with 300 mg/kg PCB153 or sesame oil vehicle and sacrificed 4, 12, 24, 72 or 168 h post dose. In the dose-response study, mice were gavaged with 1, 3, 10, 30, 100 or 300 mg/kg PCB153 or sesame oil for 24 h. Significant increases in relative liver weights were induced with 300 mg/kg PCB153 between 24 and 168 h, accompanied by slight vacuolization and hepatocellular hypertrophy. The hepatic differential expression of 186 and 177 genes was detected using Agilent 4 x 44 K microarrays in the time course (|fold change|≥1.5, P1(t)≥0.999) and dose-response (|fold change|≥1.5, P1(t)≥0.985) studies, respectively. Comparative analysis with TCDD suggests that the differential gene expression elicited by PCB153 was not mediated by the AhR. Furthermore, constitutive androstane and pregnane X receptor (CAR/PXR) regulated genes including Cyp2b10, Cyp3a11, Ces2, Insig2 and Abcc3 were dose-dependently induced by PCB153. Collectively, these results suggest that the hepatocellular effects elicited by PCB153 are qualitatively and quantitatively different from TCDD and suggestive of CAR/PXR regulation.

Keywords: PCB153, TCDD, liver, mouse, microarray

INTRODUCTION

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), manufactured in the United States from 1929 to 1977, had various applications as coolants, insulating fluids for transformers and capacitors, plasticizers in paints and cements, pesticide extenders, lubricating oils and sealants (Mullin 1984; NTP 2006b). Their chemical stability and lipophilic properties facilitated their distribution, persistence and biomagnification in the food chain, particularly in fatty tissues (Kimbrough 1995).

PCBs and related compounds elicit tissue- and species-specific effects including hepatotoxicity, immune suppression, reproductive toxicity, endocrine disruption, developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity (Poland and Knutson 1982; Knerr and Schrenk 2006). They are classified as coplanar, designated dioxin-like based on their structural similarity to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), and non-coplanar (Mullin 1984). The effects of TCDD and dioxin-like PCBs, such as 3,3′,4,4′,5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB126), are mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), facilitating the toxicity assessment of dioxin-like PCB mixtures to be expressed as toxic equivalents relative to TCDD (Van den Berg et al. 2006). TCDD and related dioxin-like PCBs are more toxic than non-coplanar PCBs, which contain ortho chlorine substituents on the biphenyl ring, which significantly reduces their binding affinity for the AhR (Giesy and Kannan 1998). Despite their non-dioxin-like characteristics, non-coplanar PCBs account for a majority of the PCBs found in environmental and biological samples.

Non-coplanar 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB153) is the congener found at the highest concentrations in human samples on a molar basis (Schecter et al. 1994; NTP 2006a). PCB153 bears little structural resemblance to TCDD, has little to no AhR binding affinity, and elicits a unique toxicity profile relative to TCDD and other coplanar PCBs, and therefore is not assigned a TEF value. Its mode of action has not been fully elucidated, but based on its structural similarity to phenobarbital and limited gene expression activity, it may be mediated via the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)/ pregnane X receptor (PXR) (Craft et al. 2002; Honkakoski et al. 2003; Tabb et al. 2004; Strathmann et al. 2006; Pascussi et al. 2007).

Previous studies have demonstrated non-additive interactions between PCB153 and dioxin-like compounds (Biegel et al. 1989; Bager et al. 1995; Suh et al. 2003; Chubb et al. 2004). PCB153 partially antagonizes TCDD-mediated cleft palate and immunotoxicity, as well as suppresses hepatic microsomal ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) induction in C57BL/6 mice (Biegel et al. 1989). Immunohistochemistry of rat livers following co-treatment with PCB126 and PCB153 also showed differential induction of Cyp1a1 compared to PCB126 alone (Chubb et al. 2004). In addition, PCB126 and PCB153 co-treatment synergistically altered hepatocellular foci development and expression of γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (Bager et al. 1995). Consequently, a more thorough examination of PCB153 is warranted in order to further elucidate the mechanisms involved in these non-additive activities.

In this report, time course and dose-dependent gene expression studies with complementary histopathology, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) lipid profiling and high-resolution gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS) tissue level analyses were conducted to investigate the hepatic effects elicited by PCB153 in immature, ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice. Comparisons were made to comparable TCDD and PCB126 studies, which used the same model, study design and data analysis strategies (Boverhof et al. 2005; Kopec et al. 2008).

MATERIALS & METHODS

Animal Husbandry

Immature female C57BL/6 mice, ovariectomized by the supplier on postnatal day (PND) 20, with body weights (BW) within 10% of the average, were obtained from Charles Rivers Laboratories (Portage, MI) on PND 25. Animals were housed in polycarbonate cages (n=5 per cage) containing cellulose fiber chips (Aspen Chip Laboratory Bedding, Northeastern Products, Warrensberg, NY) with 30-40% humidity and a 12 h light/dark cycle (07:00 h – 19:00 h). Mice had free access to deionized water and were fed ab libitum with Harlan Teklad 22/5 Rodent Diet 8640 (Madison, WI). Animals were acclimatized for 3 days prior to dosing on PND 28. The immature ovariectomized mouse was used to facilitate comparisons with other data sets obtained using the same model, study design and analysis methods (Boverhof et al. 2005; Kopec et al. 2008). Immature animals were used, since they are more responsive to AhR ligands. The animals were ovariectomized to negate potential interactions with estrogens produced by the developing ovaries, since some animals in our studies are approaching reproductive maturity. All procedures were carried out with the approval of the Michigan State University All-University Committee on Animal Use and Care.

Dose-Response and Time Course Studies

A stock solution of PCB153 (99.9% purity, AccuStandard, New Haven, CT) was first dissolved in acetone (J.T. Baker), followed by a dilution with sesame oil (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and evaporation of the acetone using nitrogen gas. The PCB153 stock solution was further diluted using sesame oil to achieve the desired dose. Animals were orally gavaged using 1.5 inch feeding needle with a 2.25 mm ball end (Cadence Science: formerly Popper and Sons, Lake Success, NY). For the dose-response study, mice (n=5 per group) were administered 0.1 ml of a single dose of 1, 3, 10, 30, 100 or 300 mg/kg of PCB153 or 0.1 ml pure sesame oil vehicle (Sigma) and sacrificed 24 h post-treatment. The 300 mg/kg PCB153 dose was used in a complementary time course study, as it was the highest dose examined that did not alter body weight gain. Animals were gavaged with either 300 mg/kg PCB153 or sesame oil vehicle and sacrificed at 4, 12, 24, 72 or 168 h. For direct comparisons between dioxin-like and non-dioxin-like responses, additional animals were treated with 30 μg/kg TCDD and sacrificed at the same time points. Furthermore, additional data sets generated using the same animal model, study design and analysis methods for 30 μg/kg TCDD and 300 μg/kg PCB126 (Boverhof et al. 2005; Kopec et al. 2008) served as comparators for this study. Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and tissue samples were removed, weighed, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C. For both the time course and dose-response studies, the section of the right liver lobe was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (Sigma) for histological analysis.

Histological Analyses

Fixed liver tissues were sectioned and processed in ethanol, xylene, and paraffin using a Thermo Electron Excelsior tissue processor (Waltham, MA). Tissues were embedded in paraffin with Miles Tissue Tek II embedding center, after which paraffin blocks were sectioned at 5 μm with a rotary microtome. Liver sections were placed on glass microscope slides, washed twice in xylene for 5 min, followed by four quick washes in ethanol and rinsing in water. Slides were placed in Gill 2 hematoxylin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for 1.5 min followed by 2-3 quick dips in 1% glacial acetic acid water and rinsed with running water for 2-3 min. Slides were then rinsed in ethanol and counterstained with 1% eosin Y-phloxine B solution (Sigma) followed by multiple rinses in ethanol and xylene. For lipid staining, liver sections were frozen in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound (Sakura, Torrance, CA) before further processing. Liver samples were sectioned at 6 μm, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 5 min, rinsed with water and immersed in 100% propylene glycol for 5 min. The slides were stained with Oil Red O solution (Sigma) for 8 min at 60°C. Following staining, slides were placed in 80% propylene glycol for 5 min and rinsed in water for 15 min. Slides were counterstained with Gill 2 hematoxylin for 30 sec and washed with water for 30 min. Coverslips were attached using aqueous mounting media. All the histological processing was performed at Michigan State University Investigative HistoPathology Laboratory, Division of Human Pathology using a modified version of previously published procedures (Sheehan and Hrapchak 1980).

Lipid Analysis by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)

Liver samples (~100 mg) from the 24, 72, 168 h PCB153, TCDD and vehicle control groups were homogenized (Polytron PT2100, Kinematica AG, Luzern, CH) in 40% methanol and acidified with concentrated HCl. Lipids were extracted with chloroform: methanol (2:1) containing 1 mM 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT; Sigma) and extraction efficiency controls (19:1n9 FFA [free fatty acid] and 19:0 TAG [triacylglycerol]) were added (Nu-Chek Prep, Elysian, MN). Protein and aqueous phases were re-extracted with chloroform and the organic phases were pooled. A derivatization standard (19:2n6 FFA; Nu-Chek Prep) was added and samples were dried under nitrogen, resuspended in 2% non-aqueous methanolic HCl and incubated at 60°C overnight. Samples were cooled to room temperature (RT) and 0.9% (w/v) NaCl and hexane were added. The organic phase was collected and a loading control (17:1n9 fatty acid methyl ester [FAME]; Nu-Chek Prep) was added. Samples were dried under nitrogen, resuspended in equal volumes of hexane and separated on Agilent 6890N gas chromatograph interfaced to Agilent 5973 mass spectrometer with DB23 column (30 m length, 0.25 mm internal diameter, 0.25 μm film thickness). Samples were run on the following temperature program: 50°C to 150°C at 40°C/ min, to 185°C at 5°C/ min, to 235°C at 3°C/ min, to 250°C at 10°C/ min. Principal component analysis (PCA) of lipid profiles was performed in R 2.6.0, data were extracted and used to generate PCA plots in GraphPad Prism 4.0.

Hepatic Triglyceride Measurement

Frozen liver samples (~100 mg) were homogenized (Polytron PT2100, Kinematica) in 1 ml of 1.15% KCl. Triglycerides were extracted from 200 μl of hepatic homogenate with 800 μl of isopropyl alcohol by vortex-mixing for 10 min. The samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 800 x g at RT and supernatant was collected into separate vials. The concentration of hepatic triglycerides was determined using a commercial L-Type Triglyceride M kit (Wako Diagnostics, Richmond, VA) with Multi-Calibrator Lipids as a standard (Wako Diagnostics). The measurements were performed according to manufacturer’s protocol with 20 μl of the triglyceride extract incubated with 150 μl of Reagent 1 followed by incubation with 50 μl of Reagent 2. Final results were normalized to the starting amount of liver (Supplementary Figure 1).

Quantification of PCB153 and TCDD Tissue Levels

Liver samples were processed in parallel with laboratory blanks and a reference or background sample at Wellington Laboratories Inc. (Guelph, ON, Canada). The samples (100 to 500 mg) were transferred to a tared screw cap culture tube and weight recorded. The sample was spiked with 13C12-PCB153 and 13C12-2,3,7,8-TCDD surrogates and then digested with hydrochloric acid. Each digested sample was then split between two screw cap tubes and hexane (3-4 ml) was added to each tube followed by vigorous mixing. The tubes were centrifuged, and the organic layer removed. The hexane extraction was performed three times per screw cap tube and the six hexane fractions were combined. The hexane fraction was then split evenly prior to clean-up and one fraction was archived. The other fraction was cleaned-up using a small multilayer (acid/base/neutral) silica gel column eluted with 20-25 ml of hexane. The eluate was concentrated on a rotary evaporator and then transferred to a conical micro-vial with pentane and dichloromethane rinses and allowed to dry. Immediately prior to injection on the high-resolution gas chromatograph/high-resolution mass spectrometer (HRGC/HRMS) system 13C12-PCB111 and 13C12-1,2,3,4-TCDD injection standards were added to the conical micro-vial.

Sesame oil (control) samples (100 to 500 mg) were weighed into tared screw cap tubes, spiked with 13C12-PCB153 and 13C12-2,3,7,8-TCDD surrogates and diluted in 5 ml of hexane. The controls were then mixed and digested with 5 ml of sulfuric acid. The tube was centrifuged and the hexane layer was removed, split evenly with one half subjected to the same clean-up as the liver samples.

Harlan Teklad 22/5 Rodent Diet 8640 feed samples were crushed and weighed (~8 g) into a pre-extracted cellulose thimble. The samples were then spiked with 13C12-PCB153 and 13C12-2,3,7,8-TCDD surrogates prior to soxhlet extraction overnight with dichloromethane. The samples were concentrated on a rotary evaporator and, transferred to a screw cap tube with hexane. The samples were then mixed and digested with 5 ml of sulfuric acid. Following centrifugation, hexane layer was removed, split evenly and processed as described above.

The identification and quantification of PCB153 and TCDD was performed using an Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) 6890 series HRGC with direct capillary interface to a Waters (Milford, MA, USA) Autospec Ultima HRMS. Chromatographic separations were carried out on a 60 m DB5 (0.25 mm ID, 0.25 μm film thickness) column in constant flow mode (Helium, 1 ml /min). All injections were 1 μl and a splitless injection was used. The mass spectrometer was operated in EI+ selective ion recording mode (SIR) at a mass resolving power of 10,000 or greater.

RNA Isolation

Frozen liver samples (~100 mg, stored at −80°C) were immediately transferred to 1 ml TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and homogenized using a Mixer Mill 300 tissue homogenizer (Retsch, Germany). Total RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s protocol with an additional acid phenol:chloroform extraction. Isolated RNA was resuspended in RNA storage solution (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX), quantified (A260), and quality was assessed by determining the A260/A280 ratio and by visual inspection of 2 μg on a denaturing gel.

Microarray Experimental Design

PCB153-, TCDD-treated and vehicle samples were individually hybridized to 4 x 44K whole mouse genome oligo microarrays (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA). Hybridizations were performed with three biological replicates using one-color labeling (Cy3) for each time point and dose, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Agilent Manual: G4140-90040 v. 5.7). Published reports suggest that one- and two-color microarrays provide comparable data, with no significant differences detected when compared to studies utilizing Cy3 and Cy5 labeling (Patterson et al. 2006). Microarray slides were scanned at 532 nm (Cy3) on a GenePix 4000B scanner (Molecular Devices, Union City, CA). Images were analyzed for feature and background intensities using GenePix Pro 6.0 (Molecular Devices). All data were managed in TIMS dbZach data management system (Burgoon and Zacharewski 2007).

Microarray Analysis

All microarray data in this study passed our laboratory quality assurance protocol (Burgoon et al. 2005). Microarray data were normalized using a semiparametric approach (Eckel et al. 2005) and the posterior probabilities were calculated using an empirical Bayes method based on a per gene and time point or dose basis using model-based t-values (Eckel et al. 2004). Gene expression data were ranked and prioritized using a |fold change|≥1.5 and P1(t) values ≥0.999 for the temporal PCB153 and TCDD data sets. However, relaxed P1(t) values (≥0.985) were also used for the PCB153 dose-response data to identify differentially expressed genes that approached the selection cut-offs to ensure the identification of ligand-specific regulation. In addition, the different statistical cut-offs were used to obtain a comparable number of differentially expressed genes between the temporal and dose-dependent microarray data sets and to account for studies being performed at two different times.

Dose-Response Modeling

Dose-response modeling was performed using a grid-enabled version of the ToxResponse Modeler (Burgoon and Zacharewski 2008). ToxResponse Modeler performs automated dose-response modeling by identifying the best fit model amongst five different mathematical model families (linear, exponential, Gaussian, sigmoidal, quadratic). The algorithm then chooses the best-fit of the five best in-class models. The overall best-fit model is then used to calculate the ED50 values. The microarray dose-response PCB153 data set was first filtered using a P1(t)>0.90 cut-off and the filtered data were analyzed to identify genes exhibiting a sigmoidal dose-response profile.

DNA Response Element Analysis Modeling

Dioxin response elements (DREs) (Sun et al. 2004), constitutive androstane receptor response elements (CAREs) (Phillips et al. 2009) and pregnane X receptor response elements (PXREs) were identified computationally using position weight matrices (PWMs) specific to each site (Supplementary Figure 2). The PXRE PWM was generated using seven published response elements that were aligned to the genome (Wang et al. 2003; Echchgadda et al. 2004; Vyhlidal et al. 2004; Pascussi et al. 2005; Zhou et al. 2006; Igarashi et al. 2007). Gene regulatory regions (−10,000 relative to the transcription start site [TSS] together with 5′-untranslated region [UTR]) were obtained from the University of California, Santa Cruz, Genome Browser for mouse (build 37), computationally searched, and each DRE, CARE and PXRE was scored. Matrix similarity scores (MSS) >0.80 are considered to be putative functional response elements.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (QRT-PCR)

QRT-PCR verification of selected microarray data was performed as described previously (Boverhof et al. 2005). Briefly, 1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed by SuperScript II (Invitrogen) using an anchored oligo-dT primer as described by the manufacturer. The cDNA (1.0 μl) was used as a template in a 30 μl PCR reaction containing 0.1 μM of forward and reverse gene-specific primers, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dNTPs, 0.025 IU AmpliTaq Gold, and 1X SYBR Green PCR buffer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). PCR amplification was conducted on an Applied Biosystems PRISM 7500 Sequence Detection System. cDNAs were quantified using a standard curve approach and the copy number of each sample was standardized to 3 housekeeping genes (ActB, Gapdh, Hprt) to control for the differences in RNA loading, quality, and cDNA synthesis (Vandesompele et al. 2002). For graphing purposes, the relative expression levels were scaled such that the expression level of the time-matched control group was equal to one.

Functional Gene Annotation and Statistical Analysis

Annotation and functional categorization of differentially regulated genes was performed using Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) (Dennis et al. 2003). All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s or Dunnett’s post hoc tests. Differences between treatment groups were considered significant when p<0.05.

RESULTS

Organ and Body Weights

In the time course study, 300 mg/kg PCB153 increased (p<0.05) relative liver weight (RLW) at 72 and 168 h (Table 1), comparable to other reports using lower doses (Craft et al. 2002; NTP 2006a). In the dose-response study, 300 mg/kg significantly increased RLW at 24 h (Table 2), similarly to 30 μg/kg TCDD and 300 μg/kg PCB126, which also increased RLW at later time points (Table 1) (Boverhof et al. 2005; Kopec et al. 2008). No significant decreases in body weight gain were observed at any of the PCB153 doses or time points, in agreement with other reports with doses as high as 360 mg/kg (Biegel et al. 1989; Craft et al. 2002).

Table 1.

Temporal Effects of 300 mg/kg PCB153 and 30 μg/kg TCDD on Terminal Body, Body Weight Gain, Absolute Liver Weight and Relative Liver Weight.

Sacrifice time (h) Treatment Terminal body
weight (g)
Body weight gain Liver weight (g) Relative liver weight
4 Vehicle 12.5 ± 0.5 1.0 ± 0.0 0.666 ± 0.028 0.053 ± 0.002
PCB153 12.5 ± 0.8 1.0 ± 0.0 0.712 ± 0.048 0.057 ± 0.001
TCDD 13.6 ± 0.8 1.0 ± 0.0 0.733 ± 0.044 0.054 ± 0.003
12 Vehicle 14.0 ± 0.7 1.0 ± 0.0 0.766 ± 0.048 0.055 ± 0.001
PCB153 13.0 ± 0.6 1.0 ± 0.0 0.730 ± 0.075 0.056 ± 0.003
TCDD 12.8 ± 0.7 1.1 ± 0.0 0.724 ± 0.025 0.056 ± 0.001
24 Vehicle 14.4 ± 0.9 1.1 ± 0.0 0.814 ± 0.070 0.056 ± 0.003
PCB153 13.3 ± 0.9 1.1 ± 0.0 0.813 ± 0.137 0.061 ± 0.009
TCDD 14.2 ± 0.9 1.1 ± 0.0 0.973 ± 0.088 0.068 ± 0.003*
72 Vehicle 15.6 ± 1.5 1.2 ± 0.0 0.918 ± 0.055 0.059 ± 0.005
PCB153 15.7 ± 0.7 1.1 ± 0.0 1.086 ± 0.135 0.069 ± 0.007*
TCDD 15.1 ± 0.7 1.2 ± 0.1 1.068 ± 0.060 0.071 ± 0.003*
168 Vehicle 17.6 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.1 1.017 ± 0.082 0.058 ± 0.004
PCB153 17.9 ± 1.2 1.4 ± 0.1 1.280 ± 0.074 0.072 ± 0.002*
TCDD 17.5 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.0 1.263 ± 0.080 0.072 ± 0.003*

Values represent mean ± standard deviation (SD) of five independent replicates. Body weight gain is represented as terminal body weight divided by body weight prior to dosing.

(*)

Asterisk indicates p<0.05 vs. vehicle.

Table 2.

Dose-Dependent Effects of PCB153 on Terminal Body, Body Weight Gain, Absolute Liver Weight and Relative Liver Weight at 24 h.

Dose (mg/kg) Treatment Terminal body
weight (g)
Body weight gain Liver weight (g) Relative liver weight
0 Vehicle 11.8 ± 1.9 1.1 ± 0.0 0.694 ± 0.085 0.059 ± 0.006
1 PCB153 14.3 ± 1.8 1.1 ± 0.0 0.850 ± 0.121 0.059 ± 0.002
3 PCB153 14.4 ± 1.7 1.1 ± 0.0 0.865 ± 0.119 0.060 ± 0.002
10 PCB153 12.7 ± 1.1 1.1 ± 0.1 0.721 ± 0.073 0.056 ± 0.004
30 PCB153 13.4 ± 1.0 1.1 ± 0.0 0.836 ± 0.066 0.062 ± 0.001
100 PCB153 13.8 ± 1.1 1.1 ± 0.0 0.829 ± 0.071 0.060 ± 0.002
300 PCB153 12.7 ± 1.9 1.1 ± 0.0 0.855 ± 0.152 0.067 ± 0.003*

Values represent mean ± SD of five independent replicates. Body weight gain is represented as terminal body weight divided by body weight prior to dosing.

(*)

Asterisk indicates p<0.05 (PCB153 vs. vehicle).

Hepatic Tissue Level Quantification

HRGC/HRMS analysis of liver samples at 24 and 168 h time points indicate that PCB153 levels (in pg/g) exhibited different hepatic accumulation kinetics relative to TCDD (Fig. 1A). PCB153 levels dramatically decreased (~3.3 fold) after 7 days, compared to TCDD which exhibited modest reductions (~1.4 fold), and in contrast to PCB126 which continued to increase throughout the study, reaching the highest concentration at 7 days (Kopec et al. 2008). These differences may be partially due to the induction of Cyp1a2 (~30 fold), which sequesters TCDD and dioxin-like compounds in the liver (DeVito et al. 1998) (Fig. 6A). PCB153 only marginally induced Cyp1a2 (~1.8 fold) (Fig. 6B), which may account for the time dependent decrease of hepatic PCB153 levels.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Hepatic PCB153 and TCDD levels per g liver wet weight measured using HRGC/HRMS. (A) Mice were gavaged with 300 mg/kg PCB153 or 30 μg/kg TCDD. Hepatic levels of PCB153 showed a dramatic decrease (~3.3 fold) after 7 days, compared to TCDD, which exhibited more modest decreases (~1.4 fold). (B) PCB153 levels attained in the 24 h dose-response study. The results are displayed as the mean ± standard error (SE) of at least three independent samples. Dose-response data are displayed on a log scale to visualize tissue levels at all doses. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant (p<0.05) difference between the treated samples and vehicle (VEH) controls.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

QRT-PCR verification of selected TCDD-regulated genes. The same RNA samples used in the time course microarray studies were also used for QRT-PCR analysis. (A) TCDD induced AhR-responsive genes, Cyp1a1, Cyp1a2, Tiparp, as well as Elovl5. (B) PCB153 elicited modest regulation of AhR-responsive genes, but down-regulation of Elovl5. All fold changes were calculated relative to vehicle controls. Bars (left y-axis) and lines (right y-axis) represent QRT-PCR and microarray data, respectively. The genes are represented by their official gene symbols. Bars represent the mean ± SE of at least four independent samples. Data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. The asterisk (*) indicates p<0.05.

PCB153 exhibited a dose-dependent increase in hepatic levels that was significantly different from controls (Fig. 1B). Absolute hepatic quantification results (in pg/g) from vehicle and treated mice from Fig. 1A-B have been included in Supplementary Table 1. Interestingly, hepatic PCB153 levels for sesame oil treated controls (Fig. 1B) were ~500 times higher than the corresponding PCB126 or TCDD levels (Kopec et al. 2008). High levels in vehicle animals have been attributed to the ingestion of PCB153 found in rodent chow (Luotamo et al. 1991; Jordan and Feeley 1999). However, only 62.1 pg/g of PCB153 was detected in Harlan Teklad 22/5 Rodent Diet 8640 using HRGC/HRMS, while levels in sesame oil were below the limits of detection (data not shown). Others suggest that non-dioxin-like PCBs may also accumulate in animals via lactational transfer (Vodicnik and Lech 1980).

Histopathology

PCB153 induced minimal hepatocellular vacuolization (Fig. 2C), comparable to the levels observed in vehicle controls (Fig. 2A). In contrast, TCDD-elicited vacuolization was more severe and localized to the periportal regions and extended to the midzonal and centrilobular regions in more severely affected mice. TCDD treatment also resulted in moderate multifocal inflammation (Fig. 2B, arrow), which was almost absent in the PCB153-treated mice. However, PCB153 elicited increasing hypertrophic responses between 24 and 168 h. Furthermore, Oil Red O staining (ORO) identified significant lipid accumulation only in the TCDD-treated animals (Supplementary Figure 3E), while PCB153 livers showed no fatty accumulation (Supplementary Figure 3F).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Representative histopathology results from vehicle, 30 μg/kg TCDD and 300 mg/kg PCB153-treated mice at 168 h. Liver sections from (A) vehicle showed an overall lack of vacuolization, (B) 30 μg/kg TCDD-treated animal exhibited slight to moderate vacuolization and instances of multifocal inflammation (arrow), and (C) an animal treated with 300 mg/kg PCB153 exhibited minimal vacuolization and hepatocellular hypertrophy. PCB153 did not elicit immune cell infiltration or necrosis. PV – Portal Vein; CV – Central Vein.

In the dose-response study, 300 mg/kg PCB153 induced the highest levels of hepatocellular vacuolization, however incidences of hypertrophy were not observed. Compared to our previous studies (Boverhof et al. 2005; Boverhof et al. 2006), 30 μg/kg TCDD elicited more dramatic vacuolization, and necrosis, as well as mixed cell infiltration that was absent in PCB153 treatment.

Lipid Profiling

Total lipids were extracted from control, TCDD and PCB153-treated livers at 24, 72 and 168 h, derivatized to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) and analyzed by GC-MS. The temporal and treatment dependent separation of FAME profiles (as fold changes) is summarized in Fig. 3. The cumulative proportion of variance for principal component (PC) 1 and PC2 is 99%, indicating that the PCA plot accurately represents the separation of the data. Comparison of PCB153- and TCDD-elicited FAME profiles identified separation around PC1 and PC2 indicating differences due to treatment and time, respectively (Fig. 3). In agreement with ORO staining, TCDD exhibited a time-dependent induction in the level of several individual FAMEs that was the highest at 168 h (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 2B) and led to hepatic lipid accumulation (Boverhof et al. 2006; Kopec et al. 2008) that was not detected in PCB153-treated animals (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 2A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

GC-MS lipid profile analysis at 24, 72 and 168 h. Principal component analysis indicated temporal and treatment dependent separation of PCB153 and TCDD fatty acid methyl ester profiles (fold change ratios) relative to their respective time-matched controls.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) GC-MS analysis of PCB153- and TCDD-treated mouse livers at 168 h. Treatment with 30 μg/kg TCDD induced a variety of individual FAMEs compared to 300 mg/kg PCB153 which did not affect FAME composition relative to control animals.

Hepatic triglyceride measurement identified a time-dependent increase in triglycerides in the TCDD group. In contrast, there was no difference in triglyceride levels between vehicle and PCB153-exposed mice (Supplementary Figure 1), consistent with ORO and GC-MS FAME analysis.

Temporal and Dose-Dependent PCB153 Gene Expression Changes

Hepatic gene expression was assessed using 4 x 44K Agilent oligonucleotide microarrays, containing ~21,000 unique annotated genes. PCB153 elicited the differential expression of 186 unique, annotated genes at one or more time points (P1(t)≥0.999 and |fold change|≥1.5) relative to vehicle controls with 72 h exhibiting the most changes (127 unique genes). In the 24 h dose-response study, PCB153 differentially regulated 177 unique genes at one or more doses (P1(t)≥0.985 and |fold change|≥1.5). Complete time course and dose-response data sets are available as Supplementary Tables 3 and 4, respectively.

Functional annotation of PCB153-elicited differential gene expression was associated with xenobiotic metabolism and oxidoreductase activity, lipid metabolism, cell cycle and cell death, and transport (Table 3). Position weight matrices (PWMs) were used to computationally identify putative dioxin, PXR/CAR response elements (Wang et al. 2003; Echchgadda et al. 2004; Sun et al. 2004; Vyhlidal et al. 2004; Pascussi et al. 2005; Zhou et al. 2006; Igarashi et al. 2007; Phillips et al. 2009) in the promoter region (−10,000 bp relative to the [TSS] together with the 5′ UTR) of responsive genes identified from the microarray analysis (Table 3).

Table 3.

Functional Categorization and Regulation of Select Hepatic Genes Identified as Differentially Regulated in Response to 300 mg/kg PCB153 and 30 μg/kg TCDD (Boverhof et al. 2005).

Functional
category
Gene name Gene symbol Entrez
Gene ID
Regulation PCB153 fold
changea
TCDD fold
change*
TCDD time course
Boverhof et al.(*)
DREsb PXREsc CAREsd
Metabolizing enzymes/
Oxidoreductase activity
aldehyde oxidase 1 Aox1 11761 2.9 2.2 N/A 4 5 2
aldo-keto reductase family 1, member B7 Akr1b7 11997 22.1 no change no change 4 6 2
aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C20 Akr1c20 116852 −2.3 −1.7 N/A - 1 -
carboxylesterase Ces2 234671 5.8 2.5 1.6 1 4 1
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily b, polypeptide 10 Cyp2b10 13088 27.5 2.3 no change 5 5 1
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily b, polypeptide 23 Cyp2b23 243881 19.7 no change N/A 2 5 -
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily b, polypeptide 9 Cyp2b9 13094 7.6 no change N/A - 4 1
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily c, polypeptide 54 Cyp2c54 404195 2.4 no change N/A - 5 1
cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily c, polypeptide 55 Cyp2c55 72082 48.4 1.8 N/A 4 3 1
cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily a, polypeptide 25 Cyp3a25 56388 3.8 no change N/A - 5 -
dihydrofolate reductase Dhfr 13361 −2.1 no change −1.5 5 5 1
flavin containing monooxygenase 5 Fmo5 14263 3.0 no change no change 2 5 1
glutathione peroxidase 2 Gpx2 14776 1.7 no change no change 8 9 3
glutathione S-transferase, alpha 2 (Yc2) Gsta2 14858 4.1 5.9 7.2 4 10 2
glutathione S-transferase, mu 4 Gstm4 14865 4.0 2.4 N/A 2 5 1
glutathione S-transferase, theta 3 Gstt3 103140 1.7 1.5 no change 3 10 3
UDP-glucose dehydrogenase Ugdh 22235 2.5 2.7 3.1 6 2 2
Lipid metabolism acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 3 Acsl3 74205 −3.1 −2.3 N/A 2 4 -
1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 4
(lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase, delta)
Agpat4 68262 −1.9 no change no change 7 4 1
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A reductase Hmgcr 15357 −5.3 −2.6 N/A 4 5 1
CDP-diacylglycerol synthase (phosphatidate
cytidylyltransferase) 2
Cds2 110911 1.7 no change no change 5 4 3
ELOVL family member 6, elongation of long chain fatty
acids (yeast)
Elovl6 170439 −3.8 −4.3 −1.8 3 5 1
fatty acid synthase Fasn 14104 −3.9 −4.3 −1.9 4 7 1
hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 2 Hsd17b2 15486 −2.0 2.2 N/A 6 6 -
insulin induced gene 2 Insig2 72999 5.9 −1.7 no change 1 4 1
phospholipase A2, group XIIA Pla2g12a 66350 1.7 3.1 N/A 14 9 1
sterol regulatory element binding factor 2 Srebf2 20788 −2.1 −1.7 1.5 8 6 4
sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1 Srebf1 20787 −2.4 −2.3 −2.1 4 16 1
Cell cycle/
Cell death
mitotic arrest deficient 1-like 1 Mad1l1 17120 2.4 no change N/A 8 8 1
cell division cycle associated 2 Cdca2 108912 2.8 no change N/A 2 3 1
growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible 45 alpha Gadd45a 13197 2.0 −3.6 N/A 3 - 2
growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible 45 beta Gadd45b 17873 10.7 3.2 4.6 4 14 4
myelocytomatosis oncogene Myc 17869 2.9 3.0 3.7 9 2 1
nucleolar protein 3 (apoptosis repressor with CARD
domain)
Nol3 78688 4.9 no change no change 12 6 -
sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 3, neutral Smpd3 58994 10.8 −2.6 N/A 4 6 1
ZW10 interactor Zwint 52696 1.8 no change N/A 2 5 -
Transport ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP),
member 3
Abcc3 76408 1.9 1.7 1.5 2 9 5
solute carrier family 1 (glutamate/neutral amino acid
transporter), member 4
Slc1a4 55963 −2.5 no change no change 6 10 -
solute carrier family 23 (nucleobase transporters),
member 1
Slc23a1 20522 2.3 −1.7 N/A 3 2 1
a

Maximum fold change, |fold change| ≥1.5, P1(t) ≥ 0.985

*

Maximum fold change, |fold change| ≥1.5, P1(t) ≥ 0.90

b

Putative DREs, PXREs and CAREs identified by computational searches (See Materials & Methods and Supplementary Figure 2) N/A – not available on cDNA microarray

c

Putative DREs, PXREs and CAREs identified by computational searches (See Materials & Methods and Supplementary Figure 2) N/A – not available on cDNA microarray

d

Putative DREs, PXREs and CAREs identified by computational searches (See Materials & Methods and Supplementary Figure 2) N/A – not available on cDNA microarray

Xenobiotic and oxidoreductase activity functions were the most highly induced among all functional clusters and almost exclusively included cytochrome P450s (e.g. Cyp2b9, Cyp2b10, Cyp2c54, Cyp3a25) and glutathione S-transferases (e.g. Gsta2, Gstt3, Gstm4), with Cyp2c55 showing the highest (48-fold) induction in both the time course and dose-response study. PCB153 modestly induced the typical “AhR-battery” genes such as Cyp1a1, Cyp1a2 and Tiparp compared to TCDD (Fig. 6A-B), while TCDD induction of PCB153-responsive genes was reciprocally modest (Table 3 and Fig. 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

QRT-PCR verification of selected PCB153-induced genes. The same RNA samples used in the time course and dose-response microarray studies were also used for QRT-PCR analysis. PCB153 induced CAR/PXR regulated genes, Cyp2b10, Cyp3a11, Cyp2c55 and Gadd45b, in (A) time course and (B) dose-response studies. (C) TCDD elicited minimal differential expression of CAR/PXR responsive genes. All fold changes were calculated relative to vehicle controls. Bars (left y-axis) and lines (right y-axis) represent QRT-PCR and microarray data, respectively. The genes are represented by their official gene symbols. Bars represent the mean ± SE of at least four independent samples. Data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s and Dunnett’s post hoc test. The asterisk (*) indicates p<0.05.

PCB153 down-regulated the lipid metabolism acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 3, Acsl3, and sterol regulatory element binding factors (Srebf1 and Srebf2) genes, −2.1 to −3.1-fold, respectively. Moreover, PCB153 repressed Elovl5 −1.9-fold, while it was induced 2.2-fold by TCDD, suggesting divergent regulation (Fig. 6A-B). The down-regulation of many lipid biosynthesis and metabolism genes by PCB153 is consistent with GS-MS FAMEs and triglyceride analysis, all indicating a lack of lipid accumulation compared to TCDD.

Genes involved in cell cycle and DNA replication, including Mad1l1 and Zwint, were up-regulated 2.4- and 2.0-fold, respectively, by PCB153. However, in contrast to TCDD, PCB153 did not induce necrosis or immune cell infiltration, even though genes involved in cell death and immune response were differentially regulated. A number of transport genes were also differentially expressed by PCB153, including ATP-binding cassette and solute carrier family members, such as Abcc3, Slc1a4, and Slc23a1.

Computational Dose-Response Modeling

Dose-response microarray data were filtered using P1(t)>0.90 cut-off and identified 846 unique annotated genes exhibiting a sigmoidal dose-response profile with reasonable ED50 values (i.e. between 1 and 300 mg/kg) (Fig. 7). 315 genes exhibited ED50s between 1 and 10 mg/kg, 124 genes were between 10 and 30 mg/kg, 140 genes between 30 and 100 mg/kg and 267 genes had ED50s between 100 and 300 mg/kg. The CAR/PXR regulated genes, Cyp2b10, Cyp2c55, Nol3, Entpd5 and Abcc3 exhibited ED50s of 38.1, 31.7, 33.9, 34.2 and 2.9 mg/kg, respectively. Supplementary Table 5 contains the list of 846 genes with their corresponding ED50 values.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Dose-response modeling. 846 genes exhibited a dose-response profile and were categorized according to their ED50 value.

Verification of Microarray Responses

QRT-PCR was used to verify the temporal and dose-dependent changes in expression for a subset of genes. Supplementary Table 6 provides the gene names, gene abbreviations, accession numbers, forward and reverse primer sequences, and amplicon sizes. In total, 20 differentially regulated genes where confirmed, including Cyp3a11, which did not satisfy the Agilent microarray data selection criteria. The differential expression of CAR/PXR-regulated genes Cyp2b10, Cyp3a11 and Gadd45b (Maglich et al. 2002; Honkakoski et al. 2003; Rosenfeld et al. 2003), as well as Cyp2c55 (48-fold) by PCB153 and TCDD was also confirmed (Fig.5A-C). In addition, AhR-responsive genes (Cyp1a1, Cyp1a2 and Tiparp) were included as a positive control for TCDD, and a negative control for PCB153 (Fig. 6A-B). Elovl5 was included as an example of divergent regulation (Fig. 6A-B). Overall, there was a good agreement in temporal and dose-dependent expression patterns between QRT-PCR and microarray analysis.

Comparison of TCDD and PCB153 elicited differential gene expression

Overall, when compared to TCDD and PCB126, PCB153 elicited a significantly different gene expression profile that did not include “AhR battery genes”, but CAR/PXR regulated genes, such as Ces2, Cyp2b10, Fmo5, Fasn, Insig2, Abcc3 and Gsta2 (Table 3). To further investigate these differences, a comprehensive comparison of the Agilent 300 mg/kg PCB153 and 30 μg/kg TCDD temporal microarray data between 4 and 168 h was performed (Fig. 8A). Using the same filtering criteria (P1(t)≥0.999 and |fold change|≥1.5), 170 and 186 differentially expressed genes elicited by TCDD and PCB153, respectively, were identified, of which only 14 were regulated by both compounds. Relaxing the statistical cut-off to P1(t)≥0.985 increased the overlap to 74 genes (Fig. 8A) A correlation plot of expression ratios compared to significance was then used to identify conserved and divergent responses between TCDD and PCB153 (Fig. 8B). Overall, only 54% of the commonly regulated genes were positively correlated in terms of fold change and significance, suggesting that TCDD and PCB153 elicit different expression patterns via different mechanisms of regulation. All 74 genes regulated by PCB153 and TCDD are listed in Supplementary Table 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

(A) Microarray data sets for 30 μg/kg TCDD and 300 mg/kg PCB153 were compared at 4, 12, 24, 72 and 168 h with stringent (|fold change|≥1.5, P1(t)≥0.999) and relaxed (|fold change|≥1.5, P1(t)≥0.985) selection criteria. Numbers in the Venn Diagram represent unique genes. (B) The correlation plot illustrates that the 74 genes regulated by TCDD and PCB153 are poorly correlated, indicating that many of the genes exhibited divergent regulation. The x-axis represents the correlation of gene expression, while the y-axis represents the correlation between significance values. Genes (dots) located within the upper right quadrant exhibit good correlation across their gene expression profiles and significance values indicating that their expression patterns are similar. Genes in the lower left quadrant are poorly correlated with respect to fold induction and significant values indicating that the TCDD and PCB153-elicited expression patterns are different, suggesting different mechanisms of regulation. Approximately 54% of the genes (40/74) were located within the upper right hand quadrant, indicating that 34 of the 74 common genes were poorly correlated. In contrast, when PCB126 and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDF) were compared to TCDD in the same model, 68% and 82% of the genes were located in the upper right hand quadrant (Kopec et al. 2008; N’Jai et al. 2008), further illustrating the differences between PCB153 and TCDD, PCB126 and TCDF.

DISCUSSION

Hepatic gene expression, histopathology and lipid profiling analysis quantitatively and qualitatively indicate that the temporal and dose-dependent effects elicited by PCB153 are mechanistically different when compared to TCDD and PCB126. These data are consistent with the effects elicited by PCB153 being regulated by CAR/PXR.

PCB153 elicited a gene expression profile that included the induction of xenobiotic metabolism genes such as Cyp2c55, Cyp2b10, Cyp3a11, Ces2, Fmo5 and Gsta2 (Maglich et al. 2002; Honkakoski et al. 2003; Rosenfeld et al. 2003) in the absence of “AhR gene battery” induction. PWM analysis computationally identified putative CAREs and PXREs within the regulatory region of numerous genes that exhibited differential expression following PCB153 treatment, further suggesting CAR/PXR regulation. This is also consistent with the in vivo induction of Cyp3a23 by highly chlorinated non co-planar PCBs (Schuetz et al. 1998), and more specifically, the induction of Gal4-PXR-regulated reporter gene activity (Tabb et al. 2004). In addition, Sprague-Dawley rat studies concluded PCB153 did not activate AhR and may be associated with the induction of phenobarbital-responsive genes (Connor et al. 1995; Vezina et al. 2004; NTP 2006a).

Hepatic responses induced by PCB153 are also in agreement with reported CAR/PXR-mediated hepatic hypertrophy (Wei et al. 2000; Staudinger et al. 2003; Blanco-Bose et al. 2008). In contrast, hepatocyte cell size and number are not affected by TCDD and PCB126 (Boverhof et al. 2005; Kopec et al. 2008). PCB153 induced hepatocellular hypertrophy between 24 and 168 h compared to controls, in agreement with the NTP Technical Report that identified pronounced and persistent increase in cell size elicited by PCB153 (NTP 2006a). In addition, liver hypertrophic responses to known CAR inducers (TCPOBOP or phenobarbital) are abolished in mice lacking the CAR gene (Wei et al. 2002; Honkakoski et al. 2003).

TCDD, PCB126 and PCB153 all induced RLW in the time course and dose-response studies (Boverhof et al. 2005; Kopec et al. 2008). However, PCB153 elicited minimal vacuolization which completely subsided by 168 h. Histopathology and lipid profiling, also suggest that PCB153 did not induce hepatic steatosis (Boverhof et al. 2005; Kopec et al. 2008), and microarray analysis indicated that PCB153 down-regulated many lipid metabolism genes. For example, Elovl5 was repressed by PCB153, but induced by TCDD, suggesting divergent regulation that may partially explain the histopathology differences. Interestingly, Elovl5 null mice (Elovl5 -/-) have higher SREBP1 protein levels that increase fatty acid synthesis and the development of steatosis (Moon et al. 2008). However, PCB153 did not affect Srebf1 expression and did not promote lipid synthesis. Other studies have shown that the CAR/PXR-mediated insulin induced genes (Insig1 and Insig2) also repress Srebf1, thereby lowering hepatic fatty acids (Rosenfeld et al. 2003; Roth et al. 2008). The PCB153 induction of Insig2 by 5.9-fold and repression of Srebf1 by −2.4-fold suggests that Elovl5 repression does fully explain the observed lipid changes. In contrast, Insig2 was down-regulated −1.7-fold and Srebf1 was repressed −2.3-fold by TCDD suggesting that this down-regulation was not sufficient to affect lipid biosynthesis.

Histopathology revealed a lack of PCB153-elicited hepatocellular necrosis/apoptosis, when compared to TCDD (Boverhof et al. 2005), consistent with other studies suggesting PCB153 reduces apoptosis in mouse hepatocytes (Tharappel et al. 2002; Lu et al. 2004). PCB153 induced Gadd45b ~11 fold, a known inhibitor of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-mediated apoptosis (Papa et al. 2004). In addition, Gadd45b null mice have attenuated Cyp2b10 expression, linking Gadd45b with direct co-activation of CAR-mediated transcription (Yamamoto and Negishi 2008). PCB153 also regulated the expression of genes involved in cell death, although there was no evidence of necrosis. For example, Myc induction following chronic PCB153 exposure has been associated with increased apoptosis in HepG2 cells (Ghosh et al. 2007). However, the single dose of PCB153 used in the current study may not be sufficient to induce cell death within 168 h.

Furthermore, there was a lack of significant immune cell accumulation associated with PCB153 treatment, unlike TCDD, which increased mixed cell infiltration, primarily in the centrilobular regions (Boverhof et al. 2005). Nevertheless, PCB153 induced expression of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 9 (Ccl9), in agreement with the increased incidence of liver inflammation in chronically treated rats (NTP 2006a). This suggests that a single dose of PCB153 may not be sufficient to increase mixed cell infiltration within a week.

In summary, PCB153 and possibly other non-coplanar congeners elicit responses that are qualitatively and quantitatively different than TCDD and other planar PCBs. PCB153 elicited no instances of inflammation, necrosis/apoptosis and did not lead to hepatic lipid accumulation. These effects are consistent with the differential gene expression responses and suggestive of CAR/PXR-mediated regulation. However, the relevance of these effects in risk assessment warrants further investigation due to significant species-specific differences in ligand preference, binding, and receptor activation when comparing human and rodent CAR/PXR orthologs (Blumberg and Evans 1998; Jones et al. 2000; Maglich et al. 2002; Tabb et al. 2004).

Supplementary Material

01
10
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Ed Dere for critically reading this manuscript.

FUNDING: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Superfund Basic Research Program (P42ES04911).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  1. Bager Y, Hemming H, Flodstrom S, Ahlborg UG, Warngard L. Interaction of 3,4,5,3′,4′-pentachlorobiphenyl and 2,4,5,2′,4′,5′-hexachlorobiphenyl in promotion of altered hepatic foci in rats. Pharmacology & toxicology. 1995;77:149–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1995.tb01004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Biegel L, Harris M, Davis D, Rosengren R, Safe L, Safe S. 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexachlorobiphenyl as a 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin antagonist in C57BL/6J mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1989;97:561–571. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(89)90261-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanco-Bose WE, Murphy MJ, Ehninger A, Offner S, Dubey C, Huang W, Moore DD, Trumpp A. C-Myc and its target FoxM1 are critical downstream effectors of constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) mediated direct liver hyperplasia. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md. 2008;48:1302–1311. doi: 10.1002/hep.22475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blumberg B, Evans RM. Orphan nuclear receptors--new ligands and new possibilities. Genes & development. 1998;12:3149–3155. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.20.3149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boverhof DR, Burgoon LD, Tashiro C, Chittim B, Harkema JR, Jump DB, Zacharewski TR. Temporal and dose-dependent hepatic gene expression patterns in mice provide new insights into TCDD-Mediated hepatotoxicity. Toxicol Sci. 2005;85:1048–1063. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boverhof DR, Burgoon LD, Tashiro C, Sharratt B, Chittim B, Harkema JR, Mendrick DL, Zacharewski TR. Comparative toxicogenomic analysis of the hepatotoxic effects of TCDD in Sprague Dawley rats and C57BL/6 mice. Toxicol Sci. 2006;94:398–416. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burgoon LD, Eckel-Passow JE, Gennings C, Boverhof DR, Burt JW, Fong CJ, Zacharewski TR. Protocols for the assurance of microarray data quality and process control. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:e172. doi: 10.1093/nar/gni167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burgoon LD, Zacharewski TR. dbZach toxicogenomic information management system. Pharmacogenomics. 2007;8:287–291. doi: 10.2217/14622416.8.3.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Burgoon LD, Zacharewski TR. Automated quantitative dose-response modeling and point of departure determination for large toxicogenomic and high-throughput screening data sets. Toxicol Sci. 2008;104:412–418. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chubb LS, Andersen ME, Broccardo CJ, Legare ME, Billings RE, Dean CE, Hanneman WH. Regional induction of CYP1A1 in rat liver following treatment with mixtures of PCB 126 and PCB 153. Toxicologic pathology. 2004;32:467–473. doi: 10.1080/01926230490483306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Connor K, Safe S, Jefcoate CR, Larsen M. Structure-dependent induction of CYP2B by polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Biochem Pharmacol. 1995;50:1913–1920. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(95)02087-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Craft ES, DeVito MJ, Crofton KM. Comparative responsiveness of hypothyroxinemia and hepatic enzyme induction in Long-Evans rats versus C57BL/6J mice exposed to TCDD-like and phenobarbital-like polychlorinated biphenyl congeners. Toxicol Sci. 2002;68:372–380. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/68.2.372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dennis G, Jr., Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane HC, Lempicki RA. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome biology. 2003;4:P3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DeVito MJ, Ross DG, Dupuy AE, Jr., Ferrario J, McDaniel D, Birnbaum LS. Dose-response relationships for disposition and hepatic sequestration of polyhalogenated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls following subchronic treatment in mice. Toxicol Sci. 1998;46:223–234. doi: 10.1006/toxs.1998.2530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Echchgadda I, Song CS, Oh TS, Cho SH, Rivera OJ, Chatterjee B. Gene regulation for the senescence marker protein DHEA-sulfotransferase by the xenobiotic-activated nuclear pregnane X receptor (PXR) Mechanisms of ageing and development. 2004;125:733–745. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2004.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eckel JE, Gennings C, Chinchilli VM, Burgoon LD, Zacharewski TR. Empirical bayes gene screening tool for time-course or dose-response microarray data. J Biopharm Stat. 2004;14:647–670. doi: 10.1081/BIP-200025656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eckel JE, Gennings C, Therneau TM, Burgoon LD, Boverhof DR, Zacharewski TR. Normalization of two-channel microarray experiments: a semiparametric approach. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:1078–1083. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ghosh S, De S, Dutta SK. Altered Protein Expressions in Chronic PCB-153-Induced Human Liver (HepG2) Cells. International journal of toxicology. 2007;26:203–212. doi: 10.1080/10915810701352648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Giesy JP, Kannan K. Dioxin-like and non-dioxin-like toxic effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): implications for risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1998;28:511–569. doi: 10.1080/10408449891344263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Honkakoski P, Sueyoshi T, Negishi M. Drug-activated nuclear receptors CAR and PXR. Annals of medicine. 2003;35:172–182. doi: 10.1080/07853890310008224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Igarashi M, Yogiashi Y, Mihara M, Takada I, Kitagawa H, Kato S. Vitamin K induces osteoblast differentiation through pregnane X receptor-mediated transcriptional control of the Msx2 gene. Molecular and cellular biology. 2007;27:7947–7954. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00813-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  22. Jones SA, Moore LB, Shenk JL, Wisely GB, Hamilton GA, McKee DD, Tomkinson NC, LeCluyse EL, Lambert MH, Willson TM, Kliewer SA, Moore JT. The pregnane X receptor: a promiscuous xenobiotic receptor that has diverged during evolution. Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md. 2000;14:27–39. doi: 10.1210/mend.14.1.0409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jordan SA, Feeley MM. PCB congener patterns in rats consuming diets containing Great Lakes salmon: analysis of fish, diets, and adipose tissue. Environmental research. 1999;80:S207–S212. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kimbrough RD. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and human health: an update. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1995;25:133–163. doi: 10.3109/10408449509021611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Knerr S, Schrenk D. Carcinogenicity of “non-dioxinlike” polychlorinated biphenyls. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006;36:663–694. doi: 10.1080/10408440600845304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kopec AK, Boverhof DR, Burgoon LD, Ibrahim-Aibo D, Harkema JR, Tashiro C, Chittim B, Zacharewski TR. Comparative Toxicogenomic Examination of the Hepatic Effects of PCB126 and TCDD in Immature, Ovariectomized C57BL/6 Mice. Toxicol Sci. 2008;102:61–75. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lu Z, Lee EY, Robertson LW, Glauert HP, Spear BT. Effect of 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB-153) on hepatocyte proliferation and apoptosis in mice deficient in the p50 subunit of the transcription factor NF-kappaB. Toxicol Sci. 2004;81:35–42. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfh193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luotamo M, Jarvisalo J, Aitio A. Assessment of exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls: analysis of selected isomers in blood and adipose tissue. Environmental research. 1991;54:121–134. doi: 10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80095-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Maglich JM, Stoltz CM, Goodwin B, Hawkins-Brown D, Moore JT, Kliewer SA. Nuclear pregnane x receptor and constitutive androstane receptor regulate overlapping but distinct sets of genes involved in xenobiotic detoxification. Mol Pharmacol. 2002;62:638–646. doi: 10.1124/mol.62.3.638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Moon YA, Hammer RE, Horton JD. Deletion of ELOVL5 leads to fatty liver through activation of SREBP-1c in mice. Journal of lipid research. 2008 doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800383-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mullin MD, Pochini CM, McCrindle S, Romkes M, Safe SH, Safe LM. High-resolution PCB analysis: synthesis and chromatographic properties of all 209 PCB congeners. Environ. Set Technol. 1984;18:468–476. doi: 10.1021/es00124a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. N’Jai A, Boverhof DR, Dere E, Burgoon LD, Tan YS, Rowlands JC, Budinsky RA, Stebbins KE, Zacharewski TR. Comparative temporal toxicogenomic analysis of TCDD- and TCDF-mediated hepatic effects in immature female C57BL/6 mice. Toxicol Sci. 2008;103:285–297. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. NTP NTP technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB 153) (CAS No. 35065-27-1) in female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (Gavage studies) Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 2006a:4–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. NTP NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 3,3′,4,4′,5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) (CAS No. 57465-28-8) in female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (Gavage Studies) NTP Technical Report. 2006b:4–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Papa S, Zazzeroni F, Bubici C, Jayawardena S, Alvarez K, Matsuda S, Nguyen DU, Pham CG, Nelsbach AH, Melis T, De Smaele E, Tang WJ, D’Adamio L, Franzoso G. Gadd45 beta mediates the NF-kappa B suppression of JNK signalling by targeting MKK7/JNKK2. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:146–153. doi: 10.1038/ncb1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pascussi JM, Gerbal-Chaloin S, Duret C, Daujat-Chavanieu M, Vilarem MJ, Maurel P. The Tangle of Nuclear Receptors that Controls Xenobiotic Metabolism and Transport: Crosstalk and Consequences. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007 doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.47.120505.105349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pascussi JM, Robert A, Nguyen M, Walrant-Debray O, Garabedian M, Martin P, Pineau T, Saric J, Navarro F, Maurel P, Vilarem MJ. Possible involvement of pregnane X receptor-enhanced CYP24 expression in drug-induced osteomalacia. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2005;115:177–186. doi: 10.1172/JCI21867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Patterson TA, Lobenhofer EK, Fulmer-Smentek SB, Collins PJ, Chu TM, Bao W, Fang H, Kawasaki ES, Hager J, Tikhonova IR, Walker SJ, Zhang L, Hurban P, de Longueville F, Fuscoe JC, Tong W, Shi L, Wolfinger RD. Performance comparison of one-color and two-color platforms within the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project. Nature biotechnology. 2006;24:1140–1150. doi: 10.1038/nbt1242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Phillips JM, Burgoon LD, Goodman JI. Phenobarbital (PB) Elicits Unique, Early Changes in the Expression of Hepatic Genes That Affect Critical Pathways in Tumor-Prone B6C3F1 Mice. Toxicol Sci. 2009 doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Poland A, Knutson JC. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons: examination of the mechanism of toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1982;22:517–554. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.22.040182.002505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rosenfeld JM, Vargas R, Jr., Xie W, Evans RM. Genetic profiling defines the xenobiotic gene network controlled by the nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor. Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md. 2003;17:1268–1282. doi: 10.1210/me.2002-0421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Roth A, Looser R, Kaufmann M, Blattler SM, Rencurel F, Huang W, Moore DD, Meyer UA. Regulatory cross-talk between drug metabolism and lipid homeostasis: constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor increase Insig-1 expression. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;73:1282–1289. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.041012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schecter A, Stanley J, Boggess K, Masuda Y, Mes J, Wolff M, Furst P, Furst C, Wilson-Yang K, Chisholm B. Polychlorinated biphenyl levels in the tissues of exposed and nonexposed humans. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102(Suppl 1):149–158. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102s1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schuetz EG, Brimer C, Schuetz JD. Environmental xenobiotics and the antihormones cyproterone acetate and spironolactone use the nuclear hormone pregnenolone X receptor to activate the CYP3A23 hormone response element. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;54:1113–1117. doi: 10.1124/mol.54.6.1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sheehan DC, Hrapchak BB. Theory and Practice of Histotechnology. second ed Mosby; St. Louis: 1980. [Google Scholar]
  46. Staudinger JL, Madan A, Carol KM, Parkinson A. Regulation of drug transporter gene expression by nuclear receptors. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals. 2003;31:523–527. doi: 10.1124/dmd.31.5.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Strathmann J, Schwarz M, Tharappel JC, Glauert HP, Spear BT, Robertson LW, Appel KE, Buchmann A. PCB 153, a non-dioxin-like tumor promoter, selects for beta-catenin (Catnb)-mutated mouse liver tumors. Toxicol Sci. 2006;93:34–40. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Suh J, Kang JS, Yang KH, Kaminski NE. Antagonism of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent induction of CYP1A1 and inhibition of IgM expression by di-ortho-substituted polychlorinated biphenyls. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2003;187:11–21. doi: 10.1016/s0041-008x(02)00040-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sun YV, Boverhof DR, Burgoon LD, Fielden MR, Zacharewski TR. Comparative analysis of dioxin response elements in human, mouse and rat genomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:4512–4523. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tabb MM, Kholodovych V, Grun F, Zhou C, Welsh WJ, Blumberg B. Highly chlorinated PCBs inhibit the human xenobiotic response mediated by the steroid and xenobiotic receptor (SXR) Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:163–169. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tharappel JC, Lee EY, Robertson LW, Spear BT, Glauert HP. Regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and transcription factor activities during the promotion of liver carcinogenesis by polychlorinated biphenyls. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2002;179:172–184. doi: 10.1006/taap.2001.9360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Van den Berg M, Birnbaum LS, Denison M, De Vito M, Farland W, Feeley M, Fiedler H, Hakansson H, Hanberg A, Haws L, Rose M, Safe S, Schrenk D, Tohyama C, Tritscher A, Tuomisto J, Tysklind M, Walker N, Peterson RE. The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol Sci. 2006;93:223–241. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome biology. 2002;3 doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034. RESEARCH0034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Vezina CM, Walker NJ, Olson JR. Subchronic exposure to TCDD, PeCDF, PCB126, and PCB153: effect on hepatic gene expression. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1636–1644. doi: 10.1289/txg.7253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Vodicnik MJ, Lech JJ. The transfer of 2,4,5,2′,4′,5′-hexachlorobiphenyl to fetuses and nursing offspring. I. Disposition in pregnant and lactating mice and accumulation in young. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1980;54:293–300. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(80)90199-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vyhlidal CA, Rogan PK, Leeder JS. Development and refinement of pregnane X receptor (PXR) DNA binding site model using information theory: insights into PXR-mediated gene regulation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:46779–46786. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M408395200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang H, Faucette S, Sueyoshi T, Moore R, Ferguson S, Negishi M, LeCluyse EL. A novel distal enhancer module regulated by pregnane X receptor/constitutive androstane receptor is essential for the maximal induction of CYP2B6 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:14146–14152. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212482200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wei P, Zhang J, Dowhan DH, Han Y, Moore DD. Specific and overlapping functions of the nuclear hormone receptors CAR and PXR in xenobiotic response. The pharmacogenomics journal. 2002;2:117–126. doi: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wei P, Zhang J, Egan-Hafley M, Liang S, Moore DD. The nuclear receptor CAR mediates specific xenobiotic induction of drug metabolism. Nature. 2000;407:920–923. doi: 10.1038/35038112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Yamamoto Y, Negishi M. The antiapoptotic factor growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible 45 beta regulates the nuclear receptor constitutive active/androstane receptor-mediated transcription. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals. 2008;36:1189–1193. doi: 10.1124/dmd.108.020628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhou J, Zhai Y, Mu Y, Gong H, Uppal H, Toma D, Ren S, Evans RM, Xie W. A novel pregnane X receptor-mediated and sterol regulatory element-binding protein-independent lipogenic pathway. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:15013–15020. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511116200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01
10
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09

RESOURCES