Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Oct 15;147(5):1660–1667. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.044

END-DIASTOLIC FLOW REVERSAL LIMITS THE EFFICACY OF PEDIATRIC INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP COUNTERPULSATION

Carlo R Bartoli 1,2, Benjamin D Rogers 3, Constantine E Ionan 4, Steven C Koenig 4,5, George M Pantalos 4,5,6
PMCID: PMC3988268  NIHMSID: NIHMS532410  PMID: 24139614

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Counterpulsation with an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) has not achieved the same successes or clinical use in pediatric patients as in adults. In a pediatric animal model, IABP efficacy was investigated to determine whether IABP timing with a high-fidelity blood pressure signal may improve counterpulsation therapy versus a low-fidelity signal.

METHODS

In Yorkshire piglets (n=19, 13.0±0.5 kg) with coronary ligation-induced acute ischemic left ventricular failure, pediatric IABPs (5 or 7cc) were placed in the descending thoracic aorta. Inflation and deflation were timed with traditional criteria from low-fidelity (fluid-filled) and high-fidelity (micromanometer) blood pressure signals during 1:1 support. Aortic, carotid, and coronary hemodynamics were measured with pressure and flow transducers. Myocardial oxygen consumption was calculated from coronary sinus and arterial blood samples. Left ventricular myocardial blood flow and end-organ blood flow were measured with microspheres.

RESULTS

Despite significant suprasystolic diastolic augmentation and afterload reduction at heart rates of 105±3bmp, left ventricular myocardial blood flow, myocardial oxygen consumption, the myocardial oxygen supply/demand relationship, cardiac output, and end-organ blood flow did not change. Statistically significant end-diastolic coronary, carotid, and aortic flow reversal occurred with IABP deflation. Inflation and deflation timed with a high-fidelity versus low-fidelity signal did not attenuate systemic flow reversal or improve the myocardial oxygen supply/demand relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic end-diastolic flow reversal limited counterpulsation efficacy in a pediatric model of acute left ventricular failure. Adjustment of IABP inflation and deflation timing with traditional criteria and a high-fidelity blood pressure waveform did not improve IABP efficacy or attenuate flow reversal. End-diastolic flow reversal may limit the efficacy of IABP counterpulsation therapy in pediatric patients with traditional timing criteria. Investigation of alternative deflation timing strategies is warranted.

Keywords: pediatric, heart failure, intraaortic balloon pump (IABP), counterpulsation, flow reversal, coronary steal

Introduction

Counterpulsation with an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most common mechanical circulatory support strategy for a variety of cardiac pathologies in adults1. Yet IABP therapy in pediatric patients has not demonstrated the same degree of efficacy and has not gained widespread clinical use2. Differences between adult and pediatric anatomy and physiology may limit the efficacy of IABP therapy in neonates, infants, and children.

In this study, we examined IABP counterpulsation in a pediatric model of acute ischemic left ventricular failure. We tested the hypothesis that the efficacy of pediatric IABP therapy is improved with a high-fidelity (micromanometer) rather than a traditional low-fidelity (fluid-filled) arterial blood pressure signal used to adjust IABP inflation and deflation timing.

Methods

All animals received humane care and were handled in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, 1996). Experimental procedures followed animal study protocols approved by the University of Louisville Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Experimental Design

Piglets (n=19, 13.0±0.5 kg) were instrumented surgically to determine aortic, carotid, and coronary artery hemodynamics. Myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) was calculated from coronary sinus and arterial blood gas data. Left ventricular myocardial blood flow and regional end-organ blood flow were determined with neutron-activated 15 μm microspheres. Sequential coronary ligation was performed to induce acute ischemic left ventricular failure. A pediatric IABP was placed in the descending thoracic aorta.

In each animal, hemodynamic waveforms (15 second data epochs), blood gasses, and end-organ blood flows were measured at steady-state during the following experimental test conditions: 1) normal baseline (IABP off), 2) coronary ligation-induced left ventricular failure (IABP off), 3) IABP support with timing adjusted to the arterial blood pressure waveform acquired with a low-fidelity (<20 Hz response) fluid-filled catheter in the radial artery, and 4) IABP support with timing adjusted to the arterial pressure waveform acquired with a high-fidelity (<5 kHz repsonse) micromanometer pressure transducer in the aortic root. Measurements were recorded during 1:1 counterpulsation support in which each aortic valve closure initiated rapid balloon inflation, and each end-diastole initiated rapid balloon deflation.

An aortic root pressure waveform transduced by a high-fidelity catheter results in a more precise waveform morphology with a more pronounced dicrotic notch, less signal gain, and less phase distortion3. Consequently, a high-fidelity signal was presumed to enable more accurate inflation and deflation timing of the IABP.

Surgical Preparation

Animals were fasted, preanesthetized with intramuscular ketamine (30 mg/kg) and acepromazine (0.2 mg/kg), and anesthetized with isoflurane (1.5 to 3%) and room air. A left lateral thoracotomy was performed and the left and right carotid artery and jugular vein were exposed through neck incisions. A single-tip high-fidelity micromanometer catheter (2.5 Fr, SPR-524, Millar Instruments, Houston, TX) was placed in the left atrium. A dual-tip high-fidelity micromanometer catheter (5 Fr, SPC-721, Millar Instruments, Houston, TX) was advanced retrograde from the ascending aorta into the left ventricle. Transit-time ultrasonic flow probes (T205, Transonics, Ithaca, NY) were placed around the aortic root, left carotid artery, and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery to measure volumetric blood flows. Sampling catheters were introduced into the coronary sinus via the hemiazygous vein, pulmonary artery, and right carotid artery to sample blood and measure blood gases. An infusion catheter was introduced into the left atrium for serial injections of microspheres during each experimental test condition to determine end-organ blood flows throughout the body4. A blood-sampling catheter was introduced into the right femoral artery for simultaneous withdrawal of a microsphere reference blood-flow sample during each test condition. A fluid-filled pressure-monitoring catheter (24 gauge Angiocath, Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT) was inserted into the right radial artery.

The animal was anticoagulated with a bolus injection of heparin (300 units/kg) and subsequent small boluses of heparin to maintain an ACT greater than 300 seconds. An IABP catheter (5 or 7 cc, Datascope, Fairfield, NJ) was inserted via a left femoral artery cut-down and advanced until the tip was distal to the left subclavian artery as confirmed by digital palpation. Balloon timing was manually adjusted with the arterial pressure waveform (fluid-filled radial artery catheter or aortic root Millar catheter) displayed on the IABP console (System 97, Datascope, Fairfield, NJ). Balloon inflation and deflation were timed to maximize aortic diastolic pressure augmentation and minimize aortic end-diastolic pressure (afterload).

Induction of Ischemic Left Ventricular Failure

Intravenous lidocaine (20 mg bolus, 20 mg/hour infusion) and esmolol (5 mg/kg bolus, 50 μg/kg/min infusion) were administered to prevent arrhythmia. Sequential coronary ligation of branches of the LAD induced acute ischemic left ventricular failure. Target cardiac dysfunction was achieved when three of four criteria were met: approximate reduction of 1) left ventricular cardiac output by 25%, 2) mean aortic pressure by 10 mmHg, 3) mixed venous O2 saturation by 10%, and 4) an elevation of left atrial pressure (LAP) and/or left ventricular end-diastolic pressure by 5 mmHg. Animals with life-threatening hypotension were supported with boluses of intravenous normal saline and continuous infusion of phenylephrine and/or epinephrine to effect.

Blood Gas Analysis

During each experimental test condition, blood samples were simultaneously withdrawn from the coronary sinus, pulmonary artery, and right carotid artery. Samples were processed with a blood gas analyzer (IRMASL Blood Analysis System, Diametrics Medical, Roseville, MN) to measure hemoglobin content ([Hb] g/dL) and hemoglobin oxygen saturation (% O2 Sat). Oxygen content ([O2]) was calculated for each blood sample:

[O2]=%O2Sat×[Hb]×O2capacityofHb(1.34mlO2/g)100=[mlO2/100ml]

Total myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) was calculated as:

MVO2=([O2]a)-([O2]cs)×MBF=(mlO2/min/100g)
  • [O2]a = arterial oxygen content, [O2]cs = coronary sinus oxygen content, MBF = total myocardial blood flow in ml/min/g as determined by the microsphere method

End-Organ Blood Flow Measurements

During each experimental test condition, a different color (isotope label) of 15 μm neutron-activated microspheres (1×106 Microspheres in 0.4 ml suspension, Biopal, Worcester, MA) was injected into the left atrium followed by a 4 ml saline flush. The microsphere technique enabled the measurement of regional end-organ blood flow in vascular beds of interest as previously described4,5. During microsphere injection, a reference blood-flow sample was drawn from the femoral artery at a rate of 4 ml/min for 60 seconds with a calibrated syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA). The withdrawal sample acted as a reference to determine organ specific flows in ml/min/g of tissue4.

Necropsy and Microsphere Analysis

After completion of the experimental protocol, animals were euthanized with an increase in anesthetic depth and an intravenous bolus injection of supersaturated KCl. After euthanasia, the heart was harvested and weighed. The ventricles were dissected from the atria. The left ventricle was dissected form the right ventricle. The brain, lungs, kidneys, pancreas, liver, spleen, and adrenals were harvested and weighed.

Tissue and reference blood samples were sent to BioPAL, Inc. (Worcester, MA) for radioactive assay and automated calculation of blood flow in ml/min/g for each sample during each experimental test condition. Tissue and blood samples were bombarded with neutrons to transiently activate each group of microspheres with a separate isotope label. The level of radioactivity detected in the sample was directly proportional to the number of microspheres present in the sample. The activity of microspheres in the reference blood sample was compared to the activity of microspheres that lodged in a tissue sample of interest. The ratio between the two activity counts was equal to the ratio between the calibrated rate of aortic withdrawal (known, 4 ml/min) and flow in the tissue of interest (unknown).

Instrumentation, Data Reduction, and Statistics

All transducers were pre- and post-calibrated against known physical standards to ensure measurement accuracy. Collected data were signal conditioned (1000X gain and 60 Hz low-pass filter) and analog-to-digital converted at a sampling rate of 400 Hz for digital analysis using our GLP compliant data acquisition system6.

Hemodynamic parameters were calculated on a beat-to-beat basis for each 15 second data set with the Hemodynamic Evaluation and Assessment Research Tool (HEART) program7 developed in Matlab (Version 6.5, MathWorks, Natick, MA). All analyzed beats in each data set (approximately 25 to 30 beats/15 second data set) were averaged to obtain a single representative mean value for each calculated parameter.

Pressure and flow waveforms were used to derive the following hemodynamic parameters: heart rate (HR), aortic pressure (AoP), left atrial pressure (LAP), left ventricular pressure (LVP), aortic flow (AoF), carotid artery flow (CarotidF), and LAD flow (LADF). Left ventricular myocardial blood flow (LVF, as determined by microspheres) normalized to MVO2 was used as an index of the oxygen supply/demand relationship.

Prism (version 4.00, GraphPad, La Jolla, CA) was used to perform statistical analyses and to plot data. To verify the induction of a clinically relevant state of left ventricular failure, paired student t-tests were used to compare values for LADF, AoF, AoP, mixed venous O2 saturation, end-organ-blood flows, LAP, and LVP at baseline and after coronary ligation. One-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey post-test for comparison of means were performed to compare left ventricular failure and IABP timing modes (low-fidelity and high-fidelity) for each parameter. A p<0.05 (95% confidence) was considered statistically significant: * vs. baseline; † vs. left ventricular failure. All data were presented as mean ± standard error.

Results

Model of Pediatric Left Ventricular Failure

Ten of the 19 piglets completed the experimental protocol. In these animals, LAD ligation produced ischemic left ventricular failure with phenotypic similarities to clinical left ventricular failure (Table 1). Animals exhibited an approximate reduction in LADFmean by 40% (26±4 to 16±3 ml/min, p<0.01), AoF by 30% (2.4±2 to 1.7±0.2 L/min, p<0.001), AoPmean by 15 mmHg (67±4 to 53±3 mmHg, p<0.01), mixed venous O2 saturation by 15% (86±1 to 70±4%, p<0.001), renal blood flow by 45–50% (left kidney: 1.69±0.29 to 0.90±0.13 ml/min/100g, p<0.05; right kidney: 2.13±0.45 to 1.02±0.18 ml/min/100g, p<0.05), and an increased LAP by approximately 3 mmHg (9±1 to 12±1, p<0.001) and LVPend-diastolic by approximately 5 mmHg (9±1 to 14±1, p<0.01).

Table 1.

HR (bpm) LADFmean (ml/min) LV CO (L/min) AoPmean (mmHg) LAPmean (mmHg) LVPend-diastolic (mmHg) L Kidney (ml/min/g) Venous O2 (%)
Baseline 107 ± 4 26 ± 4 2.30 ± 0.17 67 ± 4 9 ± 1 9 ± 1 1.69 ± 0.29 86 ± 1
LV Failure 104 ± 3 16 ± 3* 1.67 ± 0.15* 53 ± 3* 12 ± 1* 14 ± 1* 0.90 ± 0.13* 70 ± 4*
1:1 Low-Fidelity IABP 105 ± 3 18 ± 3 1.78 ± 0.15 56 ± 3 11 ± 1 14 ± 1 0.99 ± 0.22 74 ± 4
1:1 High-Fidelity IABP 107 ± 3 19 ± 3 1.84 ± 0.15 56 ± 3 11 ± 1 12 ± 2 1.01 ± 0.15 70 ± 5

HR, heart rate; LADF, left anterior descending coronary artery flow; LV CO, left ventricular cardiac output; AoP, aortic pressure; LAP, left atrial pressure; LVP, left ventricular pressure; L, left;

*

p<0.05 vs. baseline.

The other nine animals died prior to completion of the study protocol, typically from intractable arrhythmia. Data from these animals were not included in any of the analyses.

Diastolic Augmentation and Left Ventricular Afterload Reduction

At heart rates of 105±3 bpm (range 83 to 125 bpm), it was possible to achieve statistically significant suprasystolic diastolic pressure augmentation during each native cardiac beat (Figure 1 A, bottom waveform). During 1:1 IABP support timed with a low-fidelity (fluid-filled) or a high-fidelity (micromanometer) blood pressure signal, similar aortic pressure augmentation of greater than 20 mmHg was observed (Figure 1 B, p<0.0001).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A: Aortic root pressure waveforms from the same animal demonstrated suprasystolic diastolic augmentation and afterload reduction during 1:2 (middle panel) and 1:1 (bottom panel) intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) support compared to baseline (top panel). Arrows indicate supported beats. B: Diastolic augmentation of greater than 20 mmHg was achieved when the IABP was timed with a low-fidelity (fluid-filled) catheter in the radial artery or a high-fidelity (micromanometer) catheter in the aorta. AoP, Aortic Pressure; LV, left ventricular; *p<0.0001 vs. baseline; †p<0.0001 vs. LV failure.

Significant left ventricular afterload reduction, as indicated by aortic end-diastolic pressure, was also achieved (Figure 1 A, middle and bottom waveforms; Figure 2 A). During 1:1 IABP support, aortic end-diastolic pressure decreased by approximately 8 mmHg (left ventricular failure, 41±2 mmHg; low-fidelity signal, 34±3 mmHg, p<0.0001; high-fidelity signal, 33±3 mmHg, p<0.0001). The increase in left ventricular myocardial blood flow during IABP support was small and did not reach statistical significance with either a low-fidelity or high-fidelity blood pressure signal (Figure 2 B). Similarly, myocardial oxygen consumption did not change during 1:1 IABP support with either a low-fidelity or high-fidelity blood pressure signal (Figure 2 C). Despite suprasystolic diastolic augmentation and left ventricular afterload reduction, the myocardial oxygen supply/demand relationship did not significantly improve with either a low-fidelity or a high-fidelity signal to adjust IABP inflation and deflation timing (Figure 2 D).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A: End-diastolic aortic pressure (AoP) was significantly reduced during 1:1 intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy triggered with a low-fidelity (fluid-filled) catheter in the radial artery or a high-fidelity (micromanometer) catheter in the aorta. B: Left ventricular myocardial blood flow (LVF) did not improve significantly during 1:1 IABP therapy timed with either a low-fidelity or high-fidelity blood pressure signal. C: Myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) did not improve during 1:1 IABP therapy timed with either a low-fidelity or high-fidelity blood pressure signal. D: LVF normalized to MVO2, an index of the myocardial oxygen supply/demand relationship, did not improve during 1:1 IABP therapy timed with either a low-fidelity or a high-fidelity blood pressure signal. LV, left ventricular; *p<0.01 vs. baseline; †p<0.05 vs. LV failure.

Systemic Flow Reversal

Brief but statistically significant end-diastolic flow reversal occurred in the aorta, carotid artery, and LAD (Figure 3). During 1:1 IABP support, mean flow reversal in the aorta increased by approximately 40 ml/min (left ventricular failure, −65±10 ml/min; low-fidelity signal, −97±12 ml/min, p<0.0001; high-fidelity signal, −111±12 ml/min, p<0.0001). Mean flow reversal in the carotid artery increased by approximately 15 ml/min (left ventricular failure, −3±2 ml/min; low-fidelity signal, −19±3 ml/min, p<0.0001; high-fidelity signal, −20±3 ml/min, p<0.0001). Mean flow reversal in the LAD increased by approximately 0.70 ml/min (left ventricular failure, −0.24±0.06 ml/min; low-fidelity signal, −1.01±0.24 ml/min, p<0.0001; high-fidelity signal, −0.91±0.18 ml/min, p<0.0001).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A: Hemodynamic waveforms from the same animal during intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) support demonstrated suprasytolic diastolic augmentation and afterload reduction (top panel). Rapid balloon deflation and the drop in end-diastolic blood pressure produced aortic, carotid, and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery flow reversal. Arrows indicate periods of flow reversal. Waveforms show 1:2 IABP support to illustrate that flow reversal is not present with unsupported beats. B: Aortic flow (AoF) reversal increased significantly during 1:1 IABP support. C: Carotid flow (CarotidF) reversal increased significantly during 1:1 IABP support. D: LAD flow (LADF) increased significantly during 1:1 IABP support. B–D: Flow reversal was not attenuated in any artery during 1:1 IABP therapy triggered with a low-fidelity (fluid-filled) catheter in the radial artery or a high-fidelity (micromanometer) catheter in the aorta. LV, left ventricular; *p<0.01 vs. baseline; †p<0.05 vs. LV failure.

End-Organ Blood Flow

Cardiac output (AoF) did not significantly improve during 1:1 IABP support (left ventricular failure 1.67±0.15 L/min; low-fidelity signal, 1.78±0.15 L/min; high-fidelity signal, 1.84±0.15 L/min). As a result, systemic end-organ blood flow did not significantly improve with 1:1 IABP support timed with a low-fidelity or a high-fidelity blood pressure signal (Table 2).

Table 2.

ANOVA p-value L Cerebrum
(ml/min/g)
R Cerebrum
(ml/min/g)
Cerebellum
(ml/min/g)
Brainstem
(ml/min/g)
L Lung
(ml/min/g)
R Lung
(ml/min/g)
L Kidney
(ml/min/g)
R Kidney
(ml/min/g)
Pancreas
(ml/min/g)
Liver
(ml/min/g)
Spleen
(ml/min/g)
L Adrenal
(ml/min/g)
R Adrenal
(ml/min/g)

p=0.24 p=0.26 p=0.21 p=0.49 p=0.24 p=0.64 p=0.72 p=0.37 p=0.82 p=0.16 p=0.45 p=0.28 p=0.09
Baseline 0.31±0.08 0.28±0.07 0.62±0.08 0.42±0.10 1.99±0.48 2.51±0.76 1.69±0.31 2.13±0.45 0.29±0.08 0.52±0.20 1.14±0.22 0.88±0.33 0.83±0.35
Left Ventricular Failure 0.26±0.05 0.24±0.04 0.35±0.03* 0.39±0.08 0.96±0.20* 0.98±0.21* 0.90±0.13* 1.02±0.18* 0.22±0.05 0.21±0.06 0.41±0.07* 0.41±0.04 0.39±0.08
1:1 Low-Fidelity IABP 0.36±0.09 0.35±0.07 0.38±0.06 0.28±0.08 1.14±0.27 1.02±029 0.99±0.22 1.02±0.20 0.20±0.04 0.23±0.05 0.50±0.15 0.56±0.11 0.52±0.12
1:1 High-Fidelity IABP 0.33±0.07 0.30±0.06 0.43±0.06 0.38±0.11 1.16±0.24 1.14±0.23 1.01±0.15 1.20±0.18 0.19±0.04 0.36±0.08 0.54±0.09 0.62±0.14 0.63±0.13

L, left; R, right; IABP, intraaortic balloon pump;

*

p<0.05 vs. baseline.

Discussion

Pediatric patients with life-threatening heart failure present difficult clinical challenges. Over the past five decades, the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) has successfully supported pediatric patients with congenital and acquired heart disease as a bridge to decision, bridge to cardiac transplantation, and bridge to recovery. Yet mortality rates greater than 35%2,8,9 and the lowest long-term survival for any pediatric mechanical circulatory support modality10 indicate a need to improve the efficacy of pediatric IABP therapy.

In this study, in a piglet model of acute left ventricular failure, 1:1 IABP counterpulsation was possible at high heart rates. However, brief systemic blood flow reversal coincident with IABP deflation may have limited the efficacy of IABP support. Despite significant suprasystolic diastolic augmentation and significant left ventricular afterload reduction during 1:1 IABP support, left ventricular myocardial blood flow, myocardial oxygen consumption, and the myocardial oxygen supply/demand relationship did not improve. Cardiac output and end-organ blood flow also did not improve significantly. A brief but significant flow reversal in conduit arteries may have limited systemic forward flow. Traditional IABP inflation and deflation timing with a high-fidelity trigger did not attenuate flow reversal or improve IABP efficacy. These findings suggest that end-diastolic flow reversal is an important and novel mechanism that may limit the efficacy of IABP counterpulsation in pediatric patients with current inflation and deflation criteria.

Clinical Considerations

The optimal timing of pediatric IABP inflation and deflation is uncertain11,12. In any patient with an IABP, it is traditionally thought that inflation and deflation of the balloon must occur during diastole between closure of the aortic valve and the subsequent systole. In an adult patient, this timing paradigm typically is not difficult to achieve. However, pediatric patients have higher heart rates than adults (newborn, 120–160 bpm; infant/toddler, 90–130 bpm), and diastole is short. As heart rate increases, diastole becomes disproportionally shorter13. As a result, inflation and deflation of the balloon must occur within a smaller window of time. From the current study, we speculate that the short duration of diastole during high heart rates may limit the hemodynamic benefits of IABP inflation. Correspondingly, rapid balloon deflation produces a sharp reduction in aortic end-diastolic blood pressure and brief flow reversal sufficient to limit net augmentation of coronary blood flow or improve the myocardial oxygen supply/demand relationship.

Indeed, in adult patients, balloon deflation may produce a steep reduction of central end-diastolic blood pressure that may lead to a “steal” phenomenon during which coronary14,15, carotid15,16, cerebral17, and aortic15,18 blood flow reverse. Flow reversal is brief, and net flow augmentation is still positive. However, in a pediatric patient with a high heart rate, forward flow from diastolic augmentation occurs over a shorter period of time, and rapid balloon deflation occurs more frequently. As a result, the ratio between flow reversal and augmented forward flow is greater and may limit maximum net forward flow.

Importantly, coronary flow reversal may be attenuated by adjusting inflation and deflation timing14. In adults with a normal heart rate (60 to 80 bpm), sufficient time exists between each systole to allow a brief (up to 25 ms) deflation delay. As a result, subtle variations in the timing of inflation and deflation may permit an incremental tradeoff between afterload and myocardial workload reduction versus diastolic augmentation and coronary perfusion. Unfortunately, in pediatric patients, high heart rates with a shorter diastole minimize the available window to delay deflation for this tradeoff.

Similarly, brief timing errors associated with a fluid-filled versus a high-fidelity signal12 or high-fidelity signal versus echocardiographic timing19 may reduce counterpulsation efficacy in pediatric patients. A precise signal is required to accurately time inflation and deflation and maximize counterpulsation efficacy in pediatric patients. To this end, integration of a high-fidelity micromanometer into the catheter tip may eliminate timing error(s), especially compared to low-fidelity fluid-filled catheters, which introduce gain and phase distortion and tend to drift over time20. Indeed, we and other investigators19 observed that it was easier to identify inflation and deflation timing landmarks in the arterial pressure waveform acquired with a high-fidelity signal. Consequently, timing errors were unlikely responsible for end-diastolic flow reversal. In our study, adjustment of IABP timing with a high-fidelity blood pressure signal (that minimized timing error) did not significantly reduce end-diastolic flow reversal or improve hemodynamics or end-organ blood flow compared to a low-fidelity signal. This finding further supports the notion that balloon inflation and deflation with traditional timing criteria triggered by a high-fidelity arterial blood pressure signal is insufficient to improve counterpulsation therapy in pediatric patients. Instead, the development of alternative timing strategies may be needed to prevent end-diastolic flow reversal and improve IABP efficacy in pediatric patients.

Other Considerations

Counterpulsation therapy is most effective when the displaced blood volume of the balloon and the left ventricular stroke volume are similar21,22. In this study we used 5 and 7 cc IABPs, which are the clinically recommended sizes for an 8 to 18 kg infant23. However, the stroke volume of a 12 kg piglet (and 12 kg human) with left ventricular failure is approximately 15 to 17 ml, more than three times the displacement volume of these IABPs. This observation begs the question of whether a larger balloon (and larger displaced blood volume) may produce greater diastolic pressure augmentation to significantly improve diastolic coronary blood flow. By the same token, rapid deflation of a balloon with a larger volume may produce a greater drop in end-diastolic aortic blood pressure and further increase the volume of blood flow reversal. This hypothesis remains untested. However, from a technical standpoint, the size of peripheral arteries in pediatric patients may limit the size of the balloon catheter that may be safely inserted and preclude counterpulsation therapy with a larger-sized IABP.

Arterial compliance also plays an important role in counterpulsation therapy. It has been demonstrated in vitro24, experimentally in animal studies25, and clinically26 that the efficacy of counterpulsation therapy correlates inversely with arterial compliance. Specifically, stiffer arteries generate the greatest diastolic augmentation and reduction in end-diastolic blood pressure. As a result, it has been speculated that the high compliance of the pediatric aorta may limit IABP efficacy27. This effect has not been rigorously defined. Moreover, there is evidence to the contrary that the compliance of the pediatric aorta28 is sufficient to produce diastolic augmentation, afterload reduction, and improved hemodynamics27. Our results further support this point.

Future Investigations

Ongoing studies will determine whether alternative timing strategies such as delayed balloon deflation may improve the efficacy of pediatric counterpulsation. Similarly, the use of larger pediatric balloons with greater displacement volumes that are more comparable to native stroke volume may improve the efficacy of pediatric IABP counterpulsation.

Conclusions

An incomplete understanding of couterpulsation has limited the widespread application of IABPs in pediatric patients. In a piglet model of acute ischemic left ventricular failure, significant diastolic augmentation and afterload reduction were achieved with a pediatric IABP at high heart rates. However, significant aortic, carotid, and coronary blood flow reversal coincident with balloon deflation during end-diastole reduced net systemic forward flow. IABP inflation and deflation timed with traditional criteria and a high-fidelity blood pressure signal did not attenuate flow reversal or improve IABP efficacy. These findings suggest that brief end-diastolic flow reversal is an important and novel mechanism that may limit the effectiveness of IABP counterpulsation in pediatric patients with current inflation and deflation criteria.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge and thank Dr. Michael Mitchell, Kevin Gillars, Laura and Karen Lott, Cary Woolard, Dr. Guruprasad Giridharan, Dr. Kevin Soucy, and the University of Louisville Research Resource Center veterinary staff for their assistance and contributions to this manuscript.Dr. Guruprasad Giridharan, Dr. Kevin Soucy, and Dr. Steven Koenig contributed to coronary flow reversal hypothesis maturation (Ref 14) and data analysis. Dr. Michael Mitchell contributed data analysis. Dr. Steven Koenig also participated in the review and revision of manuscript drafts.

Funding

Funding for this project was provided by grants from the National Heart Lung Blood Institute (1-R01-HL61696) and Jewish Hospital Research Foundation (Louisville, KY). Kosair Charities Pediatric Heart Research Laboratories (Louisville, KY) also provided support. The Cardiac Assist Division of Datascope Corporation (Fairfield, NJ) donated the intraaortic balloon pump catheters and console used in this study. Dr. Steven Koenig and Dr. Mark Slaughter provided funding for summer medical student participation (BR).

Footnotes

Competing Interest and Disclosure Statements

The authors declare no competing financial interest or conflict of interest. No disclosures exist.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Ferguson JJ, 3rd, et al. The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1456–1462. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01553-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Collison SP, Dagar KS. The role of the intra-aortic balloon pump in supporting children with acute cardiac failure. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:308–311. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.053611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pantalos GM, et al. Intraaortic balloon pump timing discrepancies in adult patients. Artif Organs. 2011;35:857–866. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01292.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bartoli CR, Okabe K, Akiyama I, Coull B, Godleski JJ. Repeat microsphere delivery for serial measurement of regional blood perfusion in the chronically instrumented, conscious canine. Journal of Surgical Research. 2008;145:135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bartoli CR, et al. Mechanism of myocardial ischemia with an anomalous left coronary artery from the right sinus of Valsalva. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2012;144:402–408. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Koenig SC, et al. Integrated data acquisition system for medical device testing and physiology research in compliance with good laboratory practices. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2004;38:229–240. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2004)38[229:IDASFM]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schroeder MJ, Perreault B, Ewert DL, Koenig SC. HEART: an automated beat-to-beat cardiovascular analysis package using Matlab. Comput Biol Med. 2004;34:371–388. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00087-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kalavrouziotis G, et al. Intra-aortic balloon pumping in children undergoing cardiac surgery: an update of the Liverpool experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:1382–1382. e1310. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pinkney KA, et al. Current results with intraaortic balloon pumping in infants and children. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:887–891. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03563-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davies RR, et al. The use of mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation in pediatric patients: an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:421–427. 427 e421. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.09.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Minich LL, Tani LY, McGough EC, Shaddy RE, Hawkins JA. A novel approach to pediatric intraaortic balloon pump timing using M-mode echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:367–369. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00369-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pantalos GM, Minich LL, Tani LY, McGough EC, Hawkins JA. Estimation of timing errors for the intraaortic balloon pump use in pediatric patients. Asaio Journal. 1999;45:166–171. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199905000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bombardini T, et al. Diastolic time - frequency relation in the stress echo lab: filling timing and flow at different heart rates. Cardiovascular ultrasound. 2008;6:15. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-6-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lu PJ, et al. Wave energy patterns of counterpulsation: a novel approach with wave intensity analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:1205–1213. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Giridharan GA, Bartoli CR, Spence PA, Dowling RD, Koenig SC. Counterpulsation with symphony prevents retrograde carotid, aortic, and coronary flows observed with intra-aortic balloon pump support. Artificial organs. 2012;36:600–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2012.01456.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Applebaum RM, Wun HH, Katz ES, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Effects of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation on carotid artery blood flow. American Heart Journal. 1998;135:850–854. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70045-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schachtrupp A, Wrigge H, Busch T, Buhre W, Weyland A. Influence of intra-aortic balloon pumping on cerebral blood flow pattern in patients after cardiac surgery. European journal of anaesthesiology. 2005;22:165–170. doi: 10.1017/s0265021505000293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bia D, Zocalo Y, Armentano R, de Forteza E, Cabrera-Fischer E. Acute increase in reversal blood flow during counterpulsation is associated with vasoconstriction and changes in the aortic mechanics; Conference proceedings: … Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference 2007; 2007. pp. 3986–3989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Minich LL, et al. Neonatal piglet model of intraaortic balloon pumping: improved efficacy using echocardiographic timing. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1527–1532. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00954-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gardner RM. Direct blood pressure measurement--dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology. 1981;54:227–236. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198103000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moulopoulos SD. The limits of counterpulsation. International Journal of Artificial Organs. 1993;16:803–805. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bartoli CR, et al. Response to letter to the editor: A novel subcutaneous counterpulsation device: Acute hemodynamic efficacy during pharmacologically induced hypertension, hypotension, and heart failure. Artif Organs. 2011;35:93–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hawkins JA, Minich L. Mechanical circulatory support for cardiac and respiratory failure in pediatric patients. Marcel Dekker, Inc; New York, NY: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Papaioannou TG, et al. Arterial compliance is a main variable determining the effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: quantitative data from an in vitro study. Med Eng Phys. 2002;24:279–284. doi: 10.1016/s1350-4533(02)00013-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lin CY, Galysh FT, Ho KJ, Patel AS. Response to single-segment intraaortic balloon pumping as related to aortic compliance. Ann Thorac Surg. 1972;13:468–476. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65160-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Papaioannou TG, et al. New aspects on the role of blood pressure and arterial stiffness in mechanical assistance by intra-aortic balloon pump: in-vitro data and their application in clinical practice. Artificial Organs. 2004;28:717–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2004.00080.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Minich LL, et al. In vitro evaluation of the effect of aortic compliance on pediatric intra-aortic balloon pumping. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2001;2:139–144. doi: 10.1097/00130478-200104000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sharp MK, et al. Aortic input impedance in infants and children. J Appl Physiol. 2000;88:2227–2239. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.6.2227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES