Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Addict Dis. 2014;33(1):1–8. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2014.882718

Emerging Issues for our Nation's Health: The Intersection of Marijuana Use and Cardiometabolic Disease Risk

Denise C Vidot 1,2, Guillermo Prado 3, WayWay M Hlaing 1, Kristopher L Arheart 4, Sarah E Messiah 1,2
PMCID: PMC3992187  NIHMSID: NIHMS562178  PMID: 24471513

Abstract

Current marijuana use rates are the highest in the past decade and not likely to decrease given the legalization of marijuana for medicinal and/or recreational use. Concurrently, the nation is facing epidemic levels of obesity, cardiovascular disease and diabetes but little is known about the intersecting relationships of marijuana use and cardiometabolic health. The objective of this study was to explore emerging issues in context to the intersection of cardiometabolic risk and marijuana use. This topic has potential important implications for our nation's health as we relax our approach to marijuana but continue to have unacceptable rates of cardiometabolic illnesses.

Keywords: Cannabis, Marijuana, Cardiometabolic Risk, Obesity, Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Marijuana (cannabis) use rates in the United States is reportedly the highest seen in the past decade1, 2 and the prevalence is not likely to decrease given the legalization of marijuana use for both medicinal and recreational use in various states35. In 2012, current marijuana use was reported in 8 percent of the US population (18.9 million) and by 79% of current illicit drug users. These figures represent a 5 million user increase in just the past 5 years2, 6. The World Health Organization lists cannabis as the most widely cultivated and abused illicit drug in the world indicating that its use is not unique to the United States7.

Concurrent with the increasing use of marijuana are the current unrelenting epidemics of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity2, 8. One third of our nation's adult population currently lives with at least one type of cardiovascular disease9, 80 million have pre-diabetes, and 26 million have diabetes10. The World Health Organization estimates that about 82% of the United States population will be overweight (Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m2) by the year 201511. Modifiable risk factors for both cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, often referred to cardiometabolic disease when occurring simultaneously, include low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, highly sensitive c-reactive protein, and waist circumference, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, hypertension, and obesity1215,16.

The relationship between marijuana use and these current cardiometabolic health challenges in the US population have been broached but not determined. Diabetic patients who reported use of alcohol, illicit drugs, or a combination of both have been found to have an earlier onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to nonusers of alcohol/illicit drugs16. A study published in 201217 found decreased prevalence of diabetes in 20-to-59 year-old current marijuana users; however, the study analyzed National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (1988–1994) data before the increased prevalence of current marijuana use shown in recent findings1, 2

Due to a combination of the striking increase in marijuana use and the rising prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in the United States over the past decade, our objective was to identify emerging issues of cardiometabolic risk surrounding marijuana use within literature published during this same time period.

Marijuana Use in United States

Cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug in the United States1820. This may be partially attributed to the general perception that it is the least harmful when compared to other illicit drugs such as cocaine and heroin21, 22. However, the long term effects of marijuana and the trajectory of its use over the lifespan as a gateway into “hard” or illicit drug use later in life is unclear21. According to the National Institute of Drug Abuse's Monitoring the Future survey, marijuana use and accessibility among youth is the highest reported in the last decade; yet, perceived risk of marijuana use is at the lowest18. According to the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, emerging adults (aged 18-to-25-years) reported the highest current use of marijuana. Adults over 26 years of age reported marijuana use as most frequently used drug compared to other illicit drugs. In older adults aged 50+ years, the highest increase in reported current marijuana use was among 55-to-59-year-olds. The proportion of current use has tripled in the past decade in this age group2. These trends present evidence of a growing prevalence of marijuana use and need to study long term effects since its use is not likely to stop in the near future.

Cardiometabolic Risk in United States

Cardiometabolic risk factors include a number of cardiovascular and metabolic abnormalities that can ultimately lead to overt cardiovascular disease and diabetes2325. These risk factors include low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, highly sensitive c-reactive protein, waist circumference, total cholesterol, body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, fasting glucose and insulin levels, and tobacco smoking1215. Independently, the risk factors pose a set of negative health related outcomes, but when presented in a cluster, the outcomes become more severe. Moreover, those with the metabolic syndrome, a clustering of several of these factors (elevated systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, lipids and central adiposity)13 have a significantly increased risk of stroke, coronary heart disease, and myocardial infarction23, 26, 27. The International Diabetes Federation12, 28, National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III29, and World Health Organization14 have created criteria to define adults with the metabolic syndrome (Table 1); yet a consensus has not been made regarding exact cutoff values of risks that define metabolic syndrome in adolescents.

Table 1.

Comparison of Definitions for Clinical Diagnosis of the Metabolic Syndrome

Clinical Measure International Diabetes Federation28 National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel-III29 World Health Organization14
Abdominal Obesity Waist Circumference
Men: ≥94 cm (in)
Women: ≥80 cm (in)
Waist Circumference
Men: >102 cm (>40 in)
Women: >88 cm (>35 in)
Body Mass Index ≥30kg/m2 and/or waist:hip ratio >0.9 in men, >0.85 in women
Triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL ≥ 150 mg/dL ≥ 150 mg/dL
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Men: <40 mg/dL
Women: <50 mg/dL
Or specific treatment for lipid abnormality
Men: < 40 mg/dL
Women: <50 mg/dL
<0.9 mmol/L in men or <1.0 mmol/L in women
Blood Pressure ≥130 mmHg systolic
≥ 85 mmHg diastolic
or treatment of previously diagnosed hypertension
≥130 mmHg systolic
≥ 85 mmHg diastolic
or antihypertensive medication
≥140 mmHg systolic
≥90 mmHg diastolic and/or antihypertensive medication
Fasting Glucose ≥100 mg/dL or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes ≥110 mg/dL Type 2 diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, or impaired glucose tolerance

Comparison of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (1988–1994) versus 1999–2006 showed that approximately 34% of the United Stated adult population currently has the metabolic syndrome, which represents a 22.6% increase in roughly one decade. Even more alarming was the finding that the largest increase in prevalence was among 20-to-39-year-olds in both males and females30. Other studies have reported that those with the metabolic syndrome have a 78% increased risk for cardiovascular disease events and death versus those without the syndrome27, 31. Not surprisingly, several studies have reported that the presence of the metabolic syndrome is a strong predictor of both type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease28,32. .

Cardiometabolic Risk among Marijuana Users

Evidence suggests increased marijuana use and increased cardiometabolic risk independently; however, little research has been published identifying prevalence or trends of metabolic syndrome or cardiometabolic risk among previous or current marijuana users in the United States.32, 33 Physical inactivity and high-carbohydrate diets have been found to lead to an increased risk for the metabolic syndrome15, 34. Studies dating back to the late 1970's have reported that marijuana use increases appetite and food intake3538 with a significant increase in total calories and snack food intake high in carbohydrates36, 39, 40. Though the reported increase in caloric intake has been documented, a consensus has not been reached regarding the effects on cardiometabolic risk factors.

Obesity

The majority of published findings regarding cardiometabolic health-related consequences of marijuana use have been centered upon exploring associations between obesity as measured by BMI. The association between marijuana use and BMI is not clear. For example, no significant association was found in a study by Rodondi et al. (2006)38, but an increase in BMI among those who report marijuana use was found by others41, 42. The most common finding among the limited publish data indicates lower BMI among current marijuana users40, 4346. Since excess weight has been described increased cardiometabolic risk factors such as hypertension, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia47, the weight status of marijuana users is of health significance.

While some studies reported lower BMI in current users, others such as Huang et al. (2013) suggest there may be a dose-response relationship42. Huang et al. (2013) conducted a study among adolescents and found that those with an increasing pattern of marijuana use were at a greater risk of becoming obese in young adulthood compared to non-marijuana users. Infrequent users were at a lower risk of obesity than non-users. They concluded that the risk of obesity increases with a consistent marijuana use pattern over time42. Despite studies published on association, evidence of a causal relationship between marijuana use and obesity is limited. .

Studies of the association between marijuana use and waist circumference are limited. Rodondi et al. (2006)38 reported a higher waist circumference among marijuana users than in nonusers in unadjusted analyses. Such association disappeared in analyses adjusted for age, gender, race, study center, tobacco use, amount of alcohol per day, other illicit drug use (cocaine, crack, heroin, amphetamine), daily physical activity, physical fitness, education, income levels, BMI, and baseline level of waist circumference38. Penner et al. (2013)48 reported lower waist circumference among current marijuana users compared to those who never reported use; however, the study did not use gender-specific waist circumference values. This may be a limitation since abnormal waist circumference cut-off values that define cardiometabolic risk differ between males and females.12, 13

Glucose and Insulin

Associations between habitual marijuana use and insulin resistance, fasting glucose and insulin were evaluated in a recent analysis of 2005–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data48. The study reported decreased fasting insulin and glucose, BMI, and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR, a method used to quantify insulin resistance and beta-cell function) in current marijuana users compared to lifetime nonusers. In an analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III data (1988–1994), current marijuana users aged 20-to-59 years had lower prevalence of diabetes compared to noncurrent marijuana users17.

Cardiovascular Implications

The majority of studies that discuss the physical health effects of marijuana describe cardiovascular implications. Several reported increased heart rate, cardiac output, and blood pressure after marijuana use41, 4955; and have advised that patients with high risk to cardiovascular disease should refrain from using marijuana49, 51. An almost 5-fold increased risk for myocardial infarction within the hour after marijuana use was reported by Mittleman and colleagues. However, they also found the risk to decrease after the initial hour post-use41. Similar to the conflicting reports of marijuana use and obesity, evidence regarding the effect of marijuana use on systolic blood pressure is unclear. A significant increase in systolic blood pressure has been reported; yet, other studies report a non-significant increase among current marijuana users compared to non-current users38, 48.

Other Cardiometabolic Risk Factors

There have been limited reports on potential associations between marijuana use and elevated cholesterol levels. Studies have reported similar high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels among current and non marijuana users38, 48 and a significant increased total cholesterol level among current users compared to nonusers 38. Identical findings were reported with respect to increased but insignificant triglyceride levels among current marijuana users compared to nonusers after multiple covariates were adjusted in the model38, 48.

DISCUSSION

A review of the literature suggests that studies are needed to explore possible relationships between marijuana use and cardiometabolic risk in the United States population. Studies have described lower BMI among current marijuana users compared to non-users; however, it has been reported that accumulation of fat in the visceral depot has been identified as a more reliable predictor of cardiovascular disease than BMI56, 57suggesting that studies should look beyond the calculation of BMI as the sole indicator of cardiometabolic risk. Furthermore, most studies that reported association between marijuana use and BMI were cross-sectional in nature which limits the ability to determine a temporal relationship.

Although published literature did not find a significant association between current marijuana use and obesity or glucose/insulin levels, it is important to incorporate short-term and lifetime risk factors when assessing cardiometabolic disease risk58. While lower BMI or glycemic control were found among current marijuana users, higher BMI and other cardiometabolic risk factors such as insulin, glucose, HOMA-IR, triglycerides, and waist circumference were found in past users38, 48. Furthermore, the dose-response difference between categories of marijuana use seems to result in varied cardiometabolic risk levels.42

Limitations

One of the common limitations of past studies includes the measurement of marijuana use. The self-report nature of marijuana use may likely be underreported and lead to information bias. Another limitation of past studies includes the lack of a uniform definition of cut-off values for cardiometabolic risk factors15. Depending on which source investigators use (International Diabetes Federation, National Cholesterol Education Program, or World Health Organization), cardiometabolic risk and/or Metabolic Syndrome risk may differ across studies which can further contribute to conflicting results.

CONCLUSION

Emerging issues surrounding the intersection of marijuana use and cardiometabolic risk are unclear but their study is timely given the current prevalence of cardiometabolic disease and increasing marijuana use for recreational and medicinal purposes in the United States. Further attention should be given to the relationship between varied doses of marijuana use (current, past, sporadic use) and individual cardiometabolic risk factors as well as the metabolic syndrome. Further, longitudinal studies are needed to determine temporal relationships between marijuana use and cardiometabolic risk outcomes. These types of analyses could provide important information to health care professionals who provide medical care to those at high risk for cardiometabolic disease.

Acknowledgments

All work originated from the University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Divisions of Epidemiology, Pediatric Clinical Research, Prevention Science, and Biostatistics. This research was supported by NIH/NIDA grant K01 DA 026993.

Footnotes

No Conflicts of Interest to Report

References

  • 1.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration . Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; Rockville, MD: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration . Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. NSDUH; Rockville, MD: 2013. (Series H-46). HHS Publication No. (SMA) 13-4795. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kondrad E, Reid A. Colorado family physicians' attitudes toward medical marijuana. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013;26:52–60. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.01.120089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Svrakic DM, Lustman PJ, Mallya A, Lynn TA, Finney R, Svrakic NM. Legalization, decriminalization & medicinal use of cannabis: A scientific and public health perspective. Mo Med. 2012;109:90–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Office of National Drug Control Policy . Marijuana Legalization. The White House; Washington, DC: 2013. [Accessed September, 2013]. < http://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/ondcp-fact-sheets/marijuana-legalization>. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration . Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. NSDUH; Rockville, MD: 2008. (Series H-34). DHHS Publi cation No. SMA 08-4343. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.World Health Organization . Management of Substance Abuse Cannabis. World Health Organization; 2013. [Accessed September 2013]. < http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/facts/cannabis/en/>. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: A report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2012;125:e2–e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention . Heart disease and stroke prevention: Addressing the nation's leading killers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. U.S. Department of health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.World Health Organization . WHO Global Infobase: BMI/Overweight/Obesity Prevalence, United States of America. World Health Organization; 2011. [Accessed 2012]. < https://apps.who.int/infobase/Indicators.aspx>. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.International Diabetes Federation . The IDF Consensus Definition of the Metabolic Syndrome in Children and Adolescents. IDF Communications; Brussels, Belgium: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults Executive summary of the third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Beilby J. Definition of metabolic syndrome: Report of the national heart, lung, and blood Institute/American heart association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004;25(3):195–198. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000111245.75752.C6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lender D, Sysko SK. The metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk: Scope of the problem and current standard of care. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26:3S–12S. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.5part2.3S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Johnson KH, Bazargan M, Cherpitel CJ. Alcohol, tobacco, and drug use and the onset of type 2 diabetes among inner-city minority patients. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14:430–436. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rajavashisth TB, Shaheen M, Norris KC, et al. Decreased prevalence of diabetes in marijuana users: Cross-sectional data from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) III. BMJ Open. 2012;2 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000494. e000494-2011-000494. Print 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use:Overview of key findings 2011. Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; Ann Arbor, MI: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Roten AT, Baker NL, Gray KM. Marijuana craving trajectories in an adolescent marijuana cessation pharmacotherapy trial. Addict Behav. 2013;38:1788–1791. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime . World drug report. United Nations; New York: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boyce A, McArdle P. Long-term effects of cannabis. Paediatrics and Child Health. 2007;18(1):37–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nutt D, King LA, Saulsbury W, Blakemore C. Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse. Lancet. 2007;369:1047–1053. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60464-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kirk EP, Klein S. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of the cardiometabolic syndrome. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2009;11:761–765. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-4572.2009.00054.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.American Diabetes Association . The Cardiometabolic Risk Initiative. American Diabetes Association; Alexandria, VA: [Accessed 2012]. < http://professional.diabetes.org/ResourcesForProfessionals.aspx?cid=60379>. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.American Diabetes Association Clinical practice recommendations 2002. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:S1–S147. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.2007.s1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:683–689. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Florez H, Palacio A, Tamariz L. Metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: A serious link. Diabetes Voice. 2008;53:21–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.International Diabetes Federation . The IDF consensus worldwide defintion of the Metabolic Syndrome. IDF Communications; Brussels, Belgium: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute . Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. National Institutes of Health; 2001. NIH Publication No. 01-3670. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mozumdar A, Liguori G. Persistent increase of prevalence of metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults: NHANES III to NHANES 1999–2006. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:216–219. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gami AS, Witt BJ, Howard DE, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of incident cardiovascular events and death: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:403–414. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Virmani A, Binienda Z, Ali S, Gaetani F. Links between nutrition, drug abuse, and the metabolic syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1074:303–314. doi: 10.1196/annals.1369.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Virmani A, Binienda ZK, Ali SF, Gaetani F. Metabolic syndrome in drug abuse. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1122:50–68. doi: 10.1196/annals.1403.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the national cholesterol education program adult treatment panel III guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:720–732. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Greenberg I, Kuehnle J, Mendelson JH, Bernstein JG. Effects of marihuana use on body weight and caloric intake in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1976;49:79–84. doi: 10.1007/BF00427475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Foltin RW, Fischman MW, Byrne MF. Effects of smoked marijuana on food intake and body weight of humans living in a residential laboratory. Appetite. 1988;11:1–14. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(88)80017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kirkham TC. Endocannabinoids in the regulation of appetite and body weight. Behav Pharmacol. 2005;16:297–313. doi: 10.1097/00008877-200509000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rodondi N, Pletcher MJ, Liu K, Hulley SB, Sidney S. Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Marijuana use, diet, body mass index, and cardiovascular risk factors (from the CARDIA study) Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:478–484. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mohs ME, Watson RR, Leonard-Green T. Nutritional effects of marijuana, heroin, cocaine, and nicotine. J Am Diet Assoc. 1990;90:1261–1267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smit E, Crespo CJ. Dietary intake and nutritional status of US adult marijuana users: Results from the third national health and nutrition examination survey. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4:781–786. doi: 10.1079/phn2000114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mittleman MA, Lewis RA, Maclure M, Sherwood JB, Muller JE. Triggering myocardial infarction by marijuana. Circulation. 2001;103:2805–2809. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.23.2805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huang DY, Lanza HI, Anglin MD. Association between adolescent substance use and obesity in young adulthood: A group-based dual trajectory analysis. Addict Behav. 2013;38:2653–2660. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.06.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hayatbakhsh MR, O'Callaghan MJ, Mamun AA, Williams GM, Clavarino A, Najman JM. Cannabis use and obesity and young adults. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2010;36:350–356. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2010.500438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Le Foll B, Trigo JM, Sharkey KA, Le Strat Y. Cannabis and Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for weight loss? Med Hypotheses. 2013;80:564–567. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Le Strat Y, Le Foll B. Obesity and cannabis use: Results from 2 representative national surveys. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:929–933. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Brook JS, Lee JY, Finch SJ, Balka EB, Brook DW. Physical factors, personal characteristics, and substance use: Associations with obesity. Subst Abus. 2013;34:273–276. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2013.770425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cannon CP. Cardiovascular disease and modifiable cardiometabolic risk factors. Clin Cornerstone. 2008;9:24–38. doi: 10.1016/s1098-3597(09)62037-8. discussion 39–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Penner EA, Buettner H, Mittleman MA. The impact of marijuana use on glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance among US adults. Am J Med. 2013;126:583–589. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ashton CH. Adverse effects of cannabis and cannabinoids. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:637–649. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.4.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jones RT. Cardiovascular system effects of marijuana. J Clin Pharm. 2002;42:58S–63S. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.2002.tb06004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sidney S. Cardiovascular consequences of marijuana use. J Clin Pharm. 2002;42:64S–70S. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.2002.tb06005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kalant H. Adverse effects of cannabis on health: An update of the literature since 1996. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2004;28:849–863. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Panda N. Health effects of marijuana: A review. Pacific Public Health. 2006;13(2):123–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Aryana A, Williams MA. Marijuana as a trigger of cardiovascular events: Speculation or scientific certainty? Int J Cardiol. 2007;118:141–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hall W, Degenhardt L. Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use. Lancet. 2009;374:1383–1391. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61037-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sowers JR. Update on the cardiometabolic syndrome. Clin Cornerstone. 2001;4:17–23. doi: 10.1016/s1098-3597(01)90026-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rosin BL. The progression of cardiovascular risk to cardiovascular disease. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2007;8(Suppl 4):S3–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lau DC. Metabolic syndrome: Perception or reality? Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2009;11:264–271. doi: 10.1007/s11883-009-0041-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES