Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Feb 15;24(5):407–409. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.02.002

Proteinuria in Mid-Life and 39-Year Total Mortality: The Honolulu Heart Program

Gotaro Kojima 1, Kei Sonoda 1, Christina Bell 1, Randi Chen 2, Helen Petrovitch 3,1, Robert D Abbott 4,1, G Webster Ross 3,1, Suryadutt Venkat 1, Kamal Masaki 1,2
PMCID: PMC3992477  NIHMSID: NIHMS567275  PMID: 24613198

INTRODUCTION

Proteinuria is an independent predictor of cardiovascular and total mortality.[1,2] The pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the association between proteinuria and increased mortality are still poorly understood. Proteinuria is proposed to reflect widespread systemic vascular damage and endothelial disturbance and dysfunction with kidney involvement.[3]

Among proteinuria assessment methods, urine dipstick is commonly used in clinical settings as an initial screening tool because of its low cost, wide availability, and ability to provide quick point-of-care information. The urine dipstick detects urinary protein based on concentration, rather than the absolute quantity, may be influenced by daily variability in urine volume, and false-positive results occur with some health conditions.[4] Therefore, repeating urine dipstick might be beneficial to increase accuracy in evaluating proteinuria status.

Previous longitudinal population-based studies have examined the relationship between proteinuria by single measurement of urine dipstick and all-cause mortality.[57] However, multiple measurements have never been examined and a long-term relationship between dipstick proteinuria and all-cause mortality has never been investigated previously. We examined the relationship between proteinuria based on urine dipstick on two separate occasions and 39-year all-cause mortality.

METHODS

Study design and population

The Honolulu Heart Program is an ongoing prospective epidemiological cohort study of coronary heart disease and stroke established in 1965 in 8,006 Japanese-American men, born between 1900 and 1919, living on Oahu, Hawaii,[8] and recruited from World War II Selective Service Registration files.[9] Details of the study design have been published previously.[10] The Kuakini Medical Center Institutional Review Board approved this study and written informed consent was obtained from all participants at each examination.

Predictor Variable

Urine protein was assessed from urine dipstick tests in 1965–68 and 1971–74. Subjects without urine dipstick results from both examinations were excluded. Urine dipsticks with trace or greater proteinuria were considered positive. Three groups of proteinuria were identified: no proteinuria had negative dipsticks at both examinations, transient proteinuria had a positive dipstick at one examination, and persistent proteinuria had positive dipsticks at both examinations.

Outcome Variable

Comprehensive morbidity and mortality surveillance identified all-cause mortality from 1965 through December 2010.[11]

Covariates

Baseline covariates selected as possible confounders included age, cardiovascular risk factors (body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, physical activity index, total cholesterol level and alcohol consumption), and prevalent diseases (coronary heart disease, stroke, and cancer).

Statistical Analyses

Cox regression models analyzed total mortality risk for transient and persistent proteinuria groups, adjusting for baseline covariates. Additional stratified Cox regression analyses examined subgroups with or without hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases (defined as hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, or stroke) at baseline, examining total mortality risk with positive proteinuria (transient or persistent) versus no proteinuria.

RESULTS

The final analytic sample included 6,815 subjects with urine dipstick test results from both midlife examinations. Of those, 6,297 subjects (92.4%) had no proteinuria, 433 (6.4%) had transient proteinuria, and 85 (1.2%) had persistent proteinuria. The risks of total mortality by transient, persistent, and positive proteinuria for the entire cohort and subgroups, are displayed in Table 1. In fully adjusted models, transient proteinuria was associated with a 40% increased mortality risk and persistent proteinuria was associated with over a 2-fold increased mortality risk, compared to no proteinuria. Proteinuria was associated with increased mortality risk in all subgroups with or without chronic diseases, but with higher risks in the hypertensive, diabetic and cardiovascular disease subgroups. The diabetic subgroup had the highest risk, with an 85% increase in mortality.

Table 1.

Cox regression analyses according to proteinuria status, reference = no proteinuria group.

Age-Adjusted
Fully-Adjusted *
HR 95%CI p value HR 95%CI p value
Entire Cohort (n=6,815)
 Transient Proteinuria vs. None 1.55 1.40–1.71 <0.001 1.40 1.26–1.55 <0.001
 Persistent Proteinuria vs. None 2.50 2.01–3.10 <0.001 2.26 1.81–2.84 <0.001
P for trend <0.001 <0.001
Positive Proteinuria ** vs. None 1.65 1.51–1.81 <0.001 1.49 1.36–1.64 <0.001

STRATIFIED ANALYSES – Comparing Positive Proteinuria ** to No Proteinuria

Non-Hypertensives (n=3,206) 1.47 1.25–1.72 <0.001 1.40 1.19–1.65 <0.001
Hypertensives (n=3,608) 1.70 1.52–1.90 <0.001 1.54 1.37–1.73 <0.001
Non-Diabetics (n=5,750) 1.53 1.38–1.70 <0.001 1.40 1.25–1.56 <0.001
Diabetics (n=1,065) 1.98 1.65–2.37 <0.001 1.85 1.53–2.25 <0.001
CVD *** Not Present (n=2,621) 1.44 1.20–1.73 <0.001 1.32 1.09–1.59 0.004
CVD Present (n=4,194) 1.67 1.50–1.86 <0.001 1.56 1.40–1.74 <0.001
*

Adjusted for age, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pack-years smoking, physical activity index, serum cholesterol, alcohol intake, and prevalent coronary heart disease, stroke, and cancer, except for specific risk factors used for each stratified analysis.

**

Positive Proteinuria = transient or persistent proteinuria (combined).

***

CVD = cardiovascular diseases at baseline, including hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, or stroke.

DISCUSSION

In this prospective observational cohort study of 6,815 Japanese-American men, proteinuria detected by urine dipstick in mid-life was independently associated with up to 39-year total mortality. In stratified analyses, positive proteinuria was independently associated with higher mortality among those with hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease or stroke. This longitudinal population-based study had two proteinuria measurements six years apart and an unprecedented 39-year mortality follow-up period.

Significant relationships between single dipstick proteinuria and mortality have been reported previously.[57] The first National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES I, n=6,000 U.S. men and women) reported that trace proteinuria or greater on urine dipstick was associated with 71% higher total mortality than no proteinuria in men.[5] The Framingham Study (n=2,586) reported that trace and 1+ or greater dipstick proteinuria were associated with 30–40% increased 17-year total mortality.[6] Dipstick proteinuria was associated with a 43% increased mortality in Italy.[7] Other population-based studies, including one arm of a cluster randomized trial,[12] a laboratory database,[13,14] and health check-ups,[1517] may represent selected samples and lack generalizability.

This study has potential limitations. Urine dipstick results may include misclassifications,[4] although these were minimized by using urine dipstick tests from two separate occasions six years apart. Dipstick is not ideal for microalbuminuria screening, although including trace or greater proteinuria increases microalbuminuria detection.[18] We lowered the positive proteinuria threshold to trace or greater and repeated dipstick tests twice, to increase proteinuria detection. Our all-Japanese male study population may reduce generalizability. Data regarding preexisting kidney diseases, serum creatinine levels and medication use (including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) were not available.

Study strengths include the large population-based and genetically homogeneous sample, nearly four decade-long follow-up period, and an extremely thorough surveillance system, with low out-migration rates and essentially complete surveillance for total mortality. We adjusted for multiple potential confounders to assess the independent association between proteinuria and mortality.

Albuminuria may reflect widespread systemic vascular damage and endothelial disturbance with kidney involvement.[3] However, higher mortality associated with proteinuria among men without hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or renal disease may be due to occult malignancies[19] or infections.[20] Positive proteinuria should trigger further investigation, to improve health outcomes through early detection and treatment.

In summary, we found that proteinuria detected by simple urine dipstick measurement in middle-aged Japanese-American men independently predicted 39-year mortality risk. This risk was even higher among subjects with prevalent hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease or stroke, yet was a significant predictor of mortality even among subjects without prevalent chronic diseases. Although dipstick is a semiquantitative measure, it is inexpensive and has potential to provide quick and simple clinically useful information.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC-05102]; the National Institute on Aging [N01-AG-4-2149 and grant 5 U01 AG019349-05]; and office for Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent those of the federal government. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study, in the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

List of abbreviations and acronyms

95%CI

95% confidence interval

HR

Hazard ratio

NHANES

National Health and Nutrition Examination Study

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST/DISCLOSURE:

None of the authors report conflicts of interest with commercial enterprises.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.van der Velde M, Matsushita K, Coresh J, et al. Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher albuminuria are associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. A collaborative meta-analysis of high-risk population cohorts. Kidney International. 2011;79:1341–1352. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, et al. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:2073–2081. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60674-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Deckert T, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. Albuminuria reflects widespread vascular damage. The Steno hypothesis. Diab tologia. 1989;32:219–226. doi: 10.1007/BF00285287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Simerville JA, Maxted WC, Pahira JJ. Urinalysis: a comprehensive review. American Family Physician. 2005;71:1153–1162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wagner DK, Harris T, Madans JH. Proteinuria as a biomarker: risk of subsequent morbidity and mortality. Environmental research. 1994;66:160–172. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1994.1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Culleton BF, Larson MG, Parfrey PS, et al. Proteinuria as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality in older people: a prospective study. The American journal of medicine. 2000;109:1–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00444-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zambon S, Maggi S, Zanoni S, et al. Association of single measurement of estimated glomerular filtration rate and non-quantitative dipstick proteinuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the elderly. Results from the Progetto Veneto Anziani (Pro.V.A) Study. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220:201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kagan A. The Honolulu Heart Program: An Epidemiological Study of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Worth RM, Kagan A. Ascertainment of men of Japanese ancestry in Hawaii through World War II Selective Service registration. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1970;23:389–397. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(70)90022-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kagan A, Harris BR, Winkelstein W, Jr, et al. Epidemiologic studies of coronary heart disease and stroke in Japanese men living in Japan, Hawaii and California: demographic, physical, dietary and biochemical characteristics. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1974;27:345–364. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(74)90014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rhoads GG, Kagan A, Yano K. Usefulness of Community Surveillance for the Ascertainment of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1975;4:265–270. doi: 10.1093/ije/4.4.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roderick PJ, Atkins RJ, Smeeth L, et al. CKD and mortality risk in older people: a community-based population study in the United Kingdom. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2009;53:950–960. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hemmelgarn BR, Manns BJ, Lloyd A, et al. Relation between kidney function, proteinuria, and adverse outcomes. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;303:423–429. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bello A, Thompson S, Lloyd A, et al. Multiple versus single and other estimates of baseline proteinuria status as predictors of adverse outcomes in the general population. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2012;59:364–371. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nakayama M, Metoki H, Terawaki H, et al. Kidney dysfunction as a risk factor for first symptomatic stroke events in a general Japanese population--the Ohasama study. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation. 2007;22:1910–1915. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Irie F, Iso H, Sairenchi T, et al. The relationships of proteinuria, serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate with cardiovascular disease mortality in Japanese general population. Kidney International. 2006;69:1264–1271. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Oh SW, Baek SH, Kim YC, et al. Mild decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria are associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general population. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation: official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2012;27:2284–2290. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.White SL, Yu R, Craig JC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of urine dipsticks for detection of albuminuria in the general community. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2011;58:19–28. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jorgensen L, Heuch I, Jenssen T, et al. Association of albuminuria and cancer incidence. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2008;19:992–998. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007060712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chadban SJ, Atkins RC. Glomerulonephritis. Lancet. 2005;365:1797–1806. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66583-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES