LETTER
The study of environmental contamination or patient colonization is difficult in resource-poor settings, such as deployed combat or humanitarian facilities. Previous studies have relied on the use of swabs sent at great distances to laboratories for culture, with the associated uncertainty of the accuracy of the recovery results (1, 2). Even in settings where local laboratories are present, collected specimens may be referred out for processing and culture. To simulate the delays and shipping conditions that are potentially encountered using this method, we studied the recovery of bacteria from swabs that had been inoculated with multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and stored at three different temperatures for 1 and 4 weeks.
CultureSwab Plus and CultureSwab MaxV(+) Amies gel without charcoal culture swabs (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD) [here called Plus swabs and MaxV(+) swabs] were included in this study. Both types of swabs are composed of rayon fiber; the MaxV(+) swabs are embedded with a proprietary mix of proteins to maximize recovery. MDR bacteria included Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Swabs were immersed in saline solutions containing 102 or 105 organisms/ml and then stored for 1 day, 1 week, or 4 weeks at 4°C, room temperature (RT), or 45°C. After storage, swabs were streaked onto blood, MacConkey, and chromogenic (S. aureus) media, incubated overnight at 35°C, and observed for the presence and quantity of growth.
All five MDR bacteria were recovered at 1 and 4 weeks (Table 1). All bacteria were recovered at both concentrations stored at RT for 1 and 4 weeks, with the exception of low-concentration MRSA, which was not recovered from Plus swabs. At 45°C, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa were not recovered from either swab at 1 or 4 weeks; MRSA was not recovered at this temperature from Plus swabs. After storage at 4°C, with the exception of K. pneumoniae from Plus swabs at 1 week, all MDR bacteria were recovered only at the higher concentration at 1 and 4 weeks.
TABLE 1.
Recovery of MDR bacteria from swabs stored at various temperatures for 1 and 4 weeks to simulate delayed culture due to transportation
| Organism | Swab | Inoculum (CFU/ml) | Growth of bacteria after recovery at:a |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 wk |
4 wks |
|||||||
| 4°C | RT | 45°C | 4°C | RT | 45°C | |||
| A. baumannii | Plus | 102 | − | +++ | − | − | +++ | − |
| Plus | 105 | ++ | +++ | − | ++ | +++ | − | |
| MaxV(+) | 102 | − | +++ | − | − | +++ | − | |
| MaxV(+) | 105 | ++ | +++ | − | ++ | +++ | − | |
| K. pneumoniae | Plus | 102 | + | +++ | ++ | − | +++ | ++ |
| Plus | 105 | + | +++ | ++ | + | +++ | ++ | |
| MaxV(+) | 102 | − | +++ | ++ | − | +++ | ++ | |
| MaxV(+) | 105 | + | +++ | ++ | + | +++ | ++ | |
| E. coli | Plus | 102 | − | +++ | ++ | − | +++ | ++ |
| Plus | 105 | + | +++ | ++ | + | +++ | ++ | |
| MaxV(+) | 102 | − | +++ | ++ | − | +++ | ++ | |
| MaxV(+) | 105 | + | +++ | +++ | − | +++ | ++ | |
| P. aeruginosa | Plus | 102 | − | +++ | − | − | +++ | − |
| Plus | 105 | ++ | +++ | − | ++ | +++ | − | |
| MaxV(+) | 102 | − | +++ | − | − | +++ | − | |
| MaxV(+) | 105 | ++ | +++ | − | ++ | +++ | − | |
| MRSA | Plus | 102 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Plus | 105 | ++ | +++ | − | +++ | ++ | − | |
| MaxV(+) | 102 | − | ++ | +++ | − | ++ | +++ | |
| MaxV(+) | 105 | + | ++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | |
RT, room temperature storage; −, no growth; +, minimal growth; ++, moderate growth; +++, heavy growth.
Three previous studies have examined the ability of swab transport systems to recover bacteria after a time delay, but these studied delays of shorter durations and storage at lower temperature ranges. All three included the MaxV(+) swab system or its forerunner, the Copan M40 Transystem (3, 4, 5). One examined three swabs at room temperature held for up to 48 h (4). In another study, three swab types were stored at refrigerator (4°C) and room (22 to 24°C) temperatures for up to 48 h (5). That study documented the recovery of most tested bacteria at 48 h. The third study employed four swab types at room temperature for up to 7 days (3). In that study, some bacteria were recoverable out to 7 days with each swab.
Although we did not test all storage conditions that might occur during overseas or delayed shipment of specimens from remote sites of collection, our study clearly supports that MDR organisms can be shipped successfully, even if shipment is delayed up to 4 weeks, when the temperature is maintained between 4 and 24°C.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. M.L.B. is an employee of the U.S. Government.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 19 February 2014
REFERENCES
- 1.Ake J, Scott P, Wortmann G, Huang X, Barber M, Wang Z, Nikolich M, Van Echo D, Weintrob A, Lesho E. 2011. Gram-negative multidrug-resistant organism colonization in a US military healthcare facility in Iraq. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 32:545–552. 10.1086/660015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sutter DE, Bradshaw LU, Simkins LH, Summers AM, Atha M, Elwood RL, Robertson JL, Murray CK, Wortmann GW, Hospenthal DR. 2011. High incidence of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria recovered from Afghan patients at a deployed US military hospital. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 32:854–860. 10.1086/661284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morosini M, Loza E, Gutierrez O, Almaraz F, Baquero F, Canton R. 2006. Evaluation of 4 swab transport systems for the recovery of ATCC and clinical strains with characterized resistance mechanisms. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 56:19–24. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rishmawi N, Ghneim R, Kattan R, Ghneim R, Zoughbi M, Abu-Diab A, Turkuman S, Dauodi R, Shomali I, Issa AE, Siriani I, Marzouka H, Schmid I, Hindiyeh MY. 2007. Survival of fastidious and nonfastidious aerobic bacteria in three bacterial transport swab systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1278–1283. 10.1128/JCM.02110-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Van Horn KG, Audette CD, Sebeck D, Tucker KA. 2008. Comparison of the Copan ESwab system with two Amies agar swab transport systems for maintenance of microorganism viability. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:1655–1658. 10.1128/JCM.02047-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
