Abstract
We determined the pattern of attachment of the avian-origin H7N9 influenza viruses A/Anhui/1/2013 and A/Shanghai/1/2013 to the respiratory tract in ferrets, macaques, mice, pigs, and guinea pigs and compared it to that in humans. The H7N9 attachment pattern in macaques, mice, and to a lesser extent pigs and guinea pigs resembled that in humans more closely than the attachment pattern in ferrets. This information contributes to our knowledge of the different animal models for influenza.
TEXT
In March 2013, a novel avian-origin influenza A virus of the H7N9 subtype caused severe disease in humans (1, 2) and infected over 142 humans, with 45 deaths (3) to date. So far, limited but unsustained human-to-human transmission has been reported (4–6). Recently, we showed that this novel avian-origin H7N9 virus attached abundantly to epithelial cells of both the upper respiratory tract (URT) and lower respiratory tract (LRT) in humans. Unlike other avian influenza viruses, both H7N9 virus strains tested (A/Shanghai/1/2013 and A/Anhui/1/2013) attached to ciliated epithelial cells of the nasal concha, trachea, and bronchus, which is more characteristic of human influenza viruses. Furthermore, similar to other avian influenza viruses, H7N9 viruses attached to alveolar epithelial cells, alveolar macrophages, and Clara cells in the terminal bronchioli (7).
Since the emergence of this H7N9 virus, experimental infections in ferrets (Mustela putorius furo), cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis), laboratory mice (Mus musculus domesticus), domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus), and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) have been performed to gain more insight into its pathogenesis and transmissibility (8–16). However, the pattern of attachment throughout the respiratory tract, which is known to be an important factor for both pathogenicity and transmissibility (17–19), is not known for H7N9 virus in these animal species. Previously, we showed that the attachment pattern of human and avian influenza viruses differs largely among animal species (17, 19). Therefore, we determined the attachment pattern of two H7N9 virus strains—A/Shanghai/1/2013 (H7 Shanghai) and A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7 Anhui), the latter containing a Q226L (H3 numbering) substitution in the hemagglutinin (1)—in the respiratory tracts of these five animal species and compared it to that in humans (7). Furthermore, we compared the attachment pattern of H7N9 virus with that of two human influenza viruses, A/Netherlands/213/03 (H3N2) and A/Netherlands/602/09 (pandemic H1N1), and two highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses, A/Vietnam/1194/04 (H5N1) and A/Netherlands/219/03 (H7N7). All viruses were concentrated, inactivated, and labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) as described previously (17, 19). From the respiratory tracts of ferrets (n = 3), macaques (n = 2), C57BL/6 mice (n = 3), domestic pigs (n = 3), and guinea pigs (n = 2), tissue sections of the nasal concha, trachea, bronchus, bronchiolus, and alveolus were stained with FITC-labeled viruses by virus histochemistry as described previously (17, 19). The percentage of cells to which the virus attached was blindly scored in an ordinal manner, as follows: −, attachment to <1% of epithelial cells; ±, attachment to ≥1 and <10% of epithelial cells; +, attachment to ≥10% and <50% of epithelial cells; and ++, attachment to ≥50% of epithelial cells. Finally, the median score was determined for each species at the different anatomical sites. Bronchus was not included for mice or guinea pigs, as all airways present in lung tissues were not lined by cartilage and were therefore considered bronchioli.
In all species included in this study, both H7 Shanghai and H7 Anhui viruses attached to the epithelium of the URT and LRT; however, the degree of attachment among the different anatomical sites and animal models varied (Table 1; Fig. 1). In general, the attachment pattern did not resemble that of either the human influenza or the HPAI viruses (Table 1). The attachment pattern of H7 Shanghai and H7 Anhui in the macaque and mouse, and to a lesser extent the pig and guinea pig, respiratory tracts resembled the attachment pattern observed in humans (Table 1; Fig. 1). In these five species, both H7N9 viruses attached to ciliated epithelial cells in the nasal concha, trachea, and bronchus, to ciliated and nonciliated cells in the bronchioles, and to both type I and type II pneumocytes in the alveoli. In contrast, in the ferret respiratory tract, both H7 viruses attached to <10% of ciliated epithelial cells in the trachea, bronchus, and bronchioles, whereas in the human respiratory tract, H7 Shanghai and H7 Anhui viruses attached to ≥10% of the ciliated epithelial cells in the trachea and to ≥50% of ciliated epithelial cells in the bronchus and bronchioles.
TABLE 1.
Attachment of influenza viruses to the respiratory tracts of humans and animal modelsa
Virus | Species | Nasal concha |
Trachea |
Bronchus |
Bronchiole |
Alveolus |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | Cell type | Score | Cell type | Score | Cell type | Score | Cell type(s) | Score | Cell type(s)b | ||
H3N2 | Human | ++ | Cil | ++c | Cil | ++c | Cil | ++ | Cil | + | I |
Ferret | ++ | Cil | + | Cil | + | Cil | + | Cil and Clara | + | I | |
Macaque | ± | Cil | − | ND | − | ND | − | ND | ± | I | |
Mouse | − | ND | − | ND | ND | ND | − | ND | − | ND | |
Pig | ± | Cil | +c | Cil | ++ | Cil | ++ | Cil and Clara | + | I | |
Guinea pig | ± | Cil | − | ND | ND | ND | − | ND | ± | I | |
pH1N1 | Human | + | Cil | ++c | Cil | ++c | Cil | + | Cil | + | I |
Ferret | ++ | Cil | ± | Cil | ± | Cil | ± | Clara | ++d | I and II | |
Macaque | − | ND | − | ND | − | ND | ± | Cil | +d | I | |
Mouse | ± | Cil | − | ND | ND | ND | ± | Cil | ++ | I and II | |
Pig | ± | Cil | +c | Cil | ++c | Cil | ++ | Cil and Clara | + | I | |
Guinea pig | ++ | Cil | − | ND | ND | ND | ± | Clara | + | I | |
H7N9 (Shanghai) | Human | + | Cil | + | Cil | ++c | Cil | ++ | Cil and Clara | ++d | I and II |
Ferret | + | Cil | ± | Cil | ± | Cil | ± | Clara | ++d | I and II | |
Macaque | + | Cil | ++ | Cil | ++ | Cil | ++ | Cil and Clara | ++d | I and II | |
Mouse | ++ | Cil | ++ | Cil | ND | ND | ++ | Cil and Clara | ++d | I and II | |
Pig | ± | Cil | +c | Cil | ± | Cil | + | Cil and Clara | ++ | I and II | |
Guinea pig | + | Cil | ++ | Cil | ND | ND | + | Cil and Clara | ++d | I and II | |
H7N9 (Anhui) | Human | ++ | Cil | + | Cil | ++c | Cil | ++ | Cil and Clara | ++d | I and II |
Ferret | ++ | Cil | ± | Cil | ± | Cil | ± | Clara | ++d | I and II | |
Macaque | ± | Cil | + | Cil | + | Cil | ++ | Cil and Clara | ++d | I and II | |
Mouse | ++ | Cil | ++ | Cil | ND | ND | ++ | Cil and Clara | ++d | I and II | |
Pig | ± | Cil | + | Cil | + | Cil | ++ | Cil and Clara | ++d | I and II | |
Guinea pig | + | Cil | ++ | Cil | ND | ND | + | Clara | ++d | I and II | |
H5N1 | Human | − | ND | ± | ND | ± | ND | + | Clara | +d | II |
Ferret | − | ND | − | ND | − | ND | − | ND | + | II | |
Macaque | − | ND | ± | Cil | + | Cil | + | Cil and Clara | ++ | I and II | |
Mouse | ++ | Cil | ++ | Cil | ND | ND | ++ | Cil and Clara | + | II | |
Pig | − | ND | − | ND | ± | Cil | ± | Cil and Clara | ± | ND | |
Guinea pig | − | ND | ++ | Cil | ND | ND | + | Clara | +d | II | |
H7N7 | Human | − | ND | ± | ND | ±c | ND | + | Clara | +d | II |
Ferret | ± | Cil | − | ND | − | ND | ± | Clara | + | II | |
Macaque | + | Cil | ++ | Cil | ++ | Cil | + | Cil | + | I and II | |
Mouse | ++ | Cil | ++ | Cil | ND | ND | + | Cil and Clara | + | II | |
Pig | − | ND | ± | Cil | ± | Cil | + | Cil and Clara | + | II | |
Guinea pig | − | ND | + | Cil | ND | ND | − | ND | +d | II |
Scores are medians. Attachment of influenza viruses was ranked on an ordinal scale as follows: −, <1% cells positive; ±, ≥1 and <10% of cells positive; +, ≥10 and <50% of cells positive; ++, ≥50% of cells positive. Cil, ciliated epithelial cells; ND, not determined.
Type I and II pneumocytes.
Intracellular attachment to goblet cells.
Additional virus attachment to alveolar macrophages.
FIG 1.
Attachment of novel avian-origin influenza H7N9 Anhui to different parts of the respiratory tract in humans and five animal models.
Overall, there were three interesting observations regarding the attachment pattern of both H7N9 viruses in the respiratory tract of the different animal models. First, there was limited variation between the attachment patterns of H7 Shanghai and H7 Anhui in all animal models studied, despite the Q226L amino acid substitution in H7 Anhui. It is known that both viruses recognize human and avian influenza virus receptors, α-2,6- and α-2,3-linked sialic acid residues, respectively (8, 13, 20–23). In contrast to H7 viruses, the Q226L amino acid substitution is responsible for a switch in the receptor binding preference and attachment pattern in H5N1 viruses (24–26). In addition, unlike H7 Anhui, H7 Shanghai contains a serine instead of alanine at position 138 (H3 numbering) which is known to induce a slight increase in binding to α-2,6-linked sialic acids on an H5 backbone (27, 28). This suggests that multiple sites within the hemagglutinin can contribute to the attachment of influenza viruses, depending on the hemagglutinin subtype.
Second, the attachment pattern of H7 Shanghai and H7 Anhui in the macaque, mouse, and to a lesser extent pig and guinea pig respiratory tracts resembled the attachment pattern in the human respiratory tract most closely, with attachment to epithelial cells of the URT and LRT. In vivo, in vitro, and ex vivo studies confirmed that the observed attachment of H7N9 virus results in a productive infection in human bronchi (29), in macaque nasal concha, trachea, and lungs (8), in pig nasal concha, trachea, bronchi, and lungs (12, 30), and in mouse bronchi and lung parenchyma (8, 11, 13, 14). Taken together, these data suggest that the tropism of H7N9 viruses within the mammalian respiratory tract is more widespread than the tropism of, for example, HPAI H5N1 virus in humans, ferrets, macaques, pigs, and guinea pigs (31–33).
Finally, the attachment pattern of H7 Shanghai and H7 Anhui in the ferret respiratory tract showed some remarkable differences from the attachment pattern in the human respiratory tract. This discrepancy between the attachment patterns of H7N9 viruses in ferrets and humans was unexpected, because in general the attachment patterns of human and avian influenza viruses in the ferret respiratory tract resemble those observed in humans (17, 19). In addition, the ferret is commonly used to study the pathogenesis, transmissibility, and intervention strategies of this H7N9 virus. To determine whether the sparse attachment of H7 Anhui in the ferret trachea would result in lower numbers of infected cells and inefficient virus production, ferret tracheal rings from four donors were infected ex vivo with 107 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID50)/ml H7N9 virus (A/Anhui/1/2013) and incubated at 37°C in 95% O2 and 5% CO2. At 1, 6, 24, and 48 h postinfection (hpi), supernatants were collected to determine virus titers, and at 24 and 48 hpi, tissues were collected for histological analysis. For comparison, replicate tracheal rings from each donor ferret were infected with H3N2 virus (A/Netherlands/213/03), which attaches moderately to ferret tracheal epithelial cells, or with H5N1 virus (A/Vietnam/1194/04), which, like H7N9 Anhui virus, attaches sparsely to ferret tracheal epithelial cells. In these ex vivo cultures, H7N9 and H5N1 viruses had a trend toward lower virus titers than H3N2 virus, although these differences were not statistically significant due to donor variations (Fig. 2A). In addition, H7N9 and H5N1 viruses infected significantly fewer epithelial cells (P < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's multiple-comparison test), as determined by immunohistochemistry for influenza virus nucleoprotein as described previously (34), at both 24 and 48 hpi (Fig. 2B and C). Additionally, lung explants containing alveolar tissue were infected ex vivo with H7N9 Anhui virus, which attach to both type I and II pneumocytes in these tissues. For comparison, replicate lung explants were infected with either HPAI H5N1, which attaches predominantly to type II pneumocytes, or H3N2, which attaches predominantly to type I pneumocytes. In the supernatant of the ex vivo-infected lung explants, H7N9 Anhui virus titers were approximately 100× higher than titers of H5N1 and H3N2 viruses at 48 hpi, although these differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 3A). When we determined the number of virus-infected cells per 10 mm2 in the ex vivo-infected lung pieces, H7N9 Anhui virus infected significantly more epithelial cells than H3N2 virus 24 hpi (P < 0.05). At 48 hpi, there was a trend for both H5N1 virus and H7 Anhui to infect more cells than H3N2 virus, although these differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 3B and C).
FIG 2.
Ex vivo infection of ferret tracheal explants with H3N2, H7N9 Anhui, or H5N1 virus. (A) Replication kinetics of all three viruses in ferret tracheal explants. Geometric mean titers were calculated from 4 independent experiment; error bars indicate standard deviations. (B) Calculated averages of influenza virus nucleoprotein-positive cells observed per ×400 high-power field (HPF), in ferret tracheal explants from 4 independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations; asterisks indicate statistical differences with P values of <0.05. (C) Representation of influenza virus nucleoprotein-positive cells in the ferret trachea 24 h postinfection at an original magnification of ×400.
FIG 3.
Ex vivo infection of ferret lung explants with H3N2, H7N9 Anhui, or H5N1 virus. (A) Replication kinetics of all three viruses in ferret lung explants. Geometric mean titers were calculated from 4 independent experiments; error bars indicate standard deviations. (B) Calculated averages of influenza-virus-nucleoprotein-positive cells observed in ferret lung explants from 4 independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations; asterisks indicate statistical differences with P values of <0.05. (C) Representation of influenza virus nucleoprotein-positive cells in the ferret lung, 24 h postinfection, at an original magnification of ×400.
Together with the virus attachment study, these ex vivo infection experiments show that limited attachment of H7N9 Anhui to ferret tracheal epithelial cells correlated with inefficient infection. The impact of limited virus attachment in the airways of ferrets on the pathogenicity and transmissibility remains to be elucidated. Airborne transmission of H7N9 viruses in ferrets is relatively inefficient (8, 9, 12), which might reflect limited attachment to and replication in tracheal and bronchial epithelium. However, transmission of H7N9 viruses in humans is limited and therefore considered inefficient (4, 5), despite the ability of this virus to attach moderately to cells in the human trachea and bronchus.
Taken together, our data show that H7 Shanghai and H7 Anhui attached to epithelial cells in both the URT and LRT of all animal species tested. Unexpectedly, the pattern of attachment to the respiratory tracts of macaque, mouse, and to a lesser extent pig and guinea pig resembled that of humans more closely than that observed in ferrets. Although attachment is not the only determinant of the cell tropism of an influenza virus, it is important to take these observations into account when designing experimental H7N9 virus infections to study and evaluate transmission, pathogenesis, and intervention studies.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Synthetic constructs of the H7 Shanghai and H7 Anhui HA gene segments, based on sequences deposited by the WHO Chinese National Influenza Center in GISAID's EpiFlu Database, were kindly provided by Richard Webby. H7N9 (A/Anhui/1/2013) isolated from a fatal human case in China was kindly provided by the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework. Human respiratory tissues were obtained from the Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC. Respiratory tissues from the different animal models were obtained from the Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, the Heinrich-Pette Institute (Hamburg, Germany), Emory University (Atlanta, GA), and Ghent University (Belgium). We thank Peter van Run, Marco van de Bild, and Frank van der Panne for technical assistance.
This work was supported by European Union FP7 ANTIGONE (contract number 278976), European Union FP7 FLUPIG (contract number 258084) (L.L., T.K., and D.V.R.), R01 AI099000-01A1 (A.L.), an NHMRC C.J. Martin postdoctoral fellowship (1054081) (K.S.), and NIAID, NIH (contract number HHSN266200700010C) (M.D.G., E.S.).
A.D.M.E.O. is partly employed by ViroClinics Biosciences B.V. and owns share certificates in ViroClinics Biosciences B.V, and T.K. is a part-time consultant for ViroClinics Biosciences B.V.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 29 January 2014
REFERENCES
- 1.Gao R, Cao B, Hu Y, Feng Z, Wang D, Hu W, Chen J, Jie Z, Qiu H, Xu K, Xu X, Lu H, Zhu W, Gao Z, Xiang N, Shen Y, He Z, Gu Y, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Zhao X, Zhou L, Li X, Zou S, Zhang Y, Li X, Yang L, Guo J, Dong J, Li Q, Dong L, Zhu Y, Bai T, Wang S, Hao P, Yang W, Zhang Y, Han J, Yu H, Li D, Gao GF, Wu G, Wang Y, Yuan Z, Shu Y. 2013. Human infection with a novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus. N. Engl. J. Med. 368:1888–1897. 10.1056/NEJMoa1304459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yang S, Chen Y, Cui D, Yao H, Lou J, Huo Z, Xie G, Yu F, Zheng S, Yang Y, Zhu Y, Lu X, Liu X, Lau SY, Chan JF, To KK, Yuen KY, Chen H, Li L. 18 September 2013. Avian-origin influenza A(H7N9) infection in influenza A(H7N9)-affected areas of China: a serological study. J. Infect. Dis. 10.1093/infdis/jit430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization. 25 October 2013. Number of confirmed human cases of avian influenza A(H7N9) reported to WHO. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: http://www.who.int/influenza/human_animal_interface/influenza_h7n9/Data_Reports/en/index.html [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li Q, Zhou L, Zhou M, Chen Z, Li F, Wu H, Xiang N, Chen E, Tang F, Wang D, Meng L, Hong Z, Tu W, Cao Y, Li L, Ding F, Liu B, Wang M, Xie R, Gao R, Li X, Bai T, Zou S, He J, Hu J, Xu Y, Chai C, Wang S, Gao Y, Jin L, Zhang Y, Luo H, Yu H, Gao L, Pang X, Liu G, Shu Y, Yang W, Uyeki TM, Wang Y, Wu F, Feng Z. 24 April 2013. Preliminary report: epidemiology of the avian influenza A (H7N9) outbreak in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 10.1056/NEJMoa1304617 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Qi X, Qian YH, Bao CJ, Guo XL, Cui LB, Tang FY, Ji H, Huang Y, Cai PQ, Lu B, Xu K, Shi C, Zhu FC, Zhou MH, Wang H. 2013. Probable person to person transmission of novel avian influenza A (H7N9) virus in Eastern China, 2013: epidemiological investigation. Br. Med. J. 347:f4752. 10.1136/bmj.f4752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shi J, Xie J, He Z, Hu Y, He Y, Huang Q, Leng B, He W, Sheng Y, Li F, Song Y, Bai C, Gu Y, Jie Z. 2013. A detailed epidemiological and clinical description of 6 human cases of avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus infection in Shanghai. PLoS One 8:e77651. 10.1371/journal.pone.0077651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van Riel D, Leijten LM, de Graaf M, Siegers JY, Short KR, Spronken MI, Schrauwen EJ, Fouchier RA, Osterhaus AD, Kuiken T. 2013. Novel Avian-Origin Influenza A (H7N9) Virus Attaches to Epithelium in Both Upper and Lower Respiratory Tract of Humans. Am. J. Pathol. 183:1137–1143. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.06.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Watanabe T, Kiso M, Fukuyama S, Nakajima N, Imai M, Yamada S, Murakami S, Yamayoshi S, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Sakoda Y, Takashita E, McBride R, Noda T, Hatta M, Imai H, Zhao D, Kishida N, Shirakura M, de Vries RP, Shichinohe S, Okamatsu M, Tamura T, Tomita Y, Fujimoto N, Goto K, Katsura H, Kawakami E, Ishikawa I, Watanabe S, Ito M, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Sugita Y, Uraki R, Yamaji R, Eisfeld AJ, Zhong G, Fan S, Ping J, Maher EA, Hanson A, Uchida Y, Saito T, Ozawa M, Neumann G, Kida H, Odagiri T, Paulson JC, Hasegawa H, Tashiro M, Kawaoka Y. 2013. Characterization of H7N9 influenza A viruses isolated from humans. Nature 501:551–555. 10.1038/nature12392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Richard M, Schrauwen EJ, de Graaf M, Bestebroer TM, Spronken MI, van Boheemen S, de Meulder D, Lexmond P, Linster M, Herfst S, Smith DJ, van den Brand JM, Burke DF, Kuiken T, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. 2013. Limited airborne transmission of H7N9 influenza A virus between ferrets. Nature 501:560–563. 10.1038/nature12476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xu L, Bao L, Deng W, Dong L, Zhu H, Chen T, Lv Q, Li F, Yuan J, Xiang Z, Gao K, Xu Y, Huang L, Li Y, Liu J, Yao Y, Yu P, Li X, Huang W, Zhao X, Lan Y, Guo J, Yong W, Wei Q, Chen H, Zhang L, Qin C. 2013. Novel avian-origin human influenza A(H7N9) can be transmitted between ferrets via respiratory droplets. J. Infect. Dis. 209:551–556. 10.1093/infdis/jit474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xu L, Bao L, Deng W, Zhu H, Chen T, Lv Q, Li F, Yuan J, Xiang Z, Gao K, Xu Y, Huang L, Li Y, Liu J, Yao Y, Yu P, Yong W, Wei Q, Zhang L, Qin C. 2013. The mouse and ferret models for studying the novel avian-origin human influenza A (H7N9) virus. Virol. J. 10:253. 10.1186/1743-422X-10-253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhu H, Wang D, Kelvin DJ, Li L, Zheng Z, Yoon SW, Wong SS, Farooqui A, Wang J, Banner D, Chen R, Zheng R, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Hong W, Dong W, Cai Q, Roehrl MH, Huang SS, Kelvin AA, Yao T, Zhou B, Chen X, Leung GM, Poon LL, Webster RG, Webby RJ, Peiris JS, Guan Y, Shu Y. 2013. Infectivity, transmission, and pathology of human-isolated H7N9 influenza virus in ferrets and pigs. Science 341:183–186. 10.1126/science.1239844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Belser JA, Gustin KM, Pearce MB, Maines TR, Zeng H, Pappas C, Sun X, Carney PJ, Villanueva JM, Stevens J, Katz JM, Tumpey TM. 2013. Pathogenesis and transmission of avian influenza A (H7N9) virus in ferrets and mice. Nature 501:556–559. 10.1038/nature12391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mok CK, Lee HH, Chan MC, Sia SF, Lestra M, Nicholls JM, Zhu H, Guan Y, Peiris JM. 2013. Pathogenicity of the novel A/H7N9 influenza virus in mice. mBio 4:e0032–13. 10.1128/mBio.00362-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kreijtz JH, Kroeze EJ, Stittelaar KJ, de Waal L, van Amerongen G, van Trierum S, van Run P, Bestebroer T, Kuiken T, Fouchier RA, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus AD. 2013. Low pathogenic avian influenza A(H7N9) virus causes high mortality in ferrets upon intratracheal challenge: a model to study intervention strategies. Vaccine 31:4995–4999. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang Q, Shi J, Deng G, Guo J, Zeng X, He X, Kong H, Gu C, Li X, Liu J, Wang G, Chen Y, Liu L, Liang L, Li Y, Fan J, Wang J, Li W, Guan L, Li Q, Yang H, Chen P, Jiang L, Guan Y, Xin X, Jiang Y, Tian G, Wang X, Qiao C, Li C, Bu Z, Chen H. 2013. H7N9 influenza viruses are transmissible in ferrets by respiratory droplet. Science 341:410–414. 10.1126/science.1240532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.van Riel D, Munster VJ, de Wit E, Rimmelzwaan GF, Fouchier RA, Osterhaus AD, Kuiken T. 2007. Human and avian influenza viruses target different cells in the lower respiratory tract of humans and other mammals. Am. J. Pathol. 171:1215–1223. 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van Riel D, den Bakker MA, Leijten LM, Chutinimitkul S, Munster VJ, de Wit E, Rimmelzwaan GF, Fouchier RA, Osterhaus AD, Kuiken T. 2010. Seasonal and pandemic human influenza viruses attach better to human upper respiratory tract epithelium than avian influenza viruses. Am. J. Pathol. 176:1614–1618. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.van Riel D, Munster VJ, de Wit E, Rimmelzwaan GF, Fouchier RA, Osterhaus AD, Kuiken T. 2006. H5N1 virus attachment to lower respiratory tract. Science 312:399. 10.1126/science.1125548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xiong X, Martin SR, Haire LF, Wharton SA, Daniels RS, Bennett MS, McCauley JW, Collins PJ, Walker PA, Skehel JJ, Gamblin SJ. 2013. Receptor binding by an H7N9 influenza virus from humans. Nature 499:496–499. 10.1038/nature12372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang H, Carney PJ, Chang JC, Villanueva JM, Stevens J. 2013. Structural analysis of the hemagglutinin from the recent 2013 H7N9 influenza virus. J. Virol. 87:12433–12446. 10.1128/JVI.01854-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tharakaraman K, Jayaraman A, Raman R, Viswanathan K, Stebbins NW, Johnson D, Shriver Z, Sasisekharan V, Sasisekharan R. 2013. Glycan receptor binding of the influenza A virus H7N9 hemagglutinin. Cell 153:1486–1493. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xu R, de Vries RP, Zhu X, Nycholat CM, McBride R, Yu W, Paulson JC, Wilson IA. 2013. Preferential recognition of avian-like receptors in human influenza A H7N9 viruses. Science 342:1230–1235. 10.1126/science.1243761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chutinimitkul S, van Riel D, Munster VJ, van den Brand JM, Rimmelzwaan GF, Kuiken T, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA, de Wit E. 2010. In vitro assessment of attachment pattern and replication efficiency of H5N1 influenza A viruses with altered receptor specificity. J. Virol. 84:6825–6833. 10.1128/JVI.02737-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Herfst S, Schrauwen EJ, Linster M, Chutinimitkul S, de Wit E, Munster VJ, Sorrell EM, Bestebroer TM, Burke DF, Smith DJ, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. 2012. Airborne transmission of influenza A/H5N1 virus between ferrets. Science 336:1534–1541. 10.1126/science.1213362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Imai M, Watanabe T, Hatta M, Das SC, Ozawa M, Shinya K, Zhong G, Hanson A, Katsura H, Watanabe S, Li C, Kawakami E, Yamada S, Kiso M, Suzuki Y, Maher EA, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. 2012. Experimental adaptation of an influenza H5 HA confers respiratory droplet transmission to a reassortant H5 HA/H1N1 virus in ferrets. Nature 486:420–428. 10.1038/nature10831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kageyama T, Fujisaki S, Takashita E, Xu H, Yamada S, Uchida Y, Neumann G, Saito T, Kawaoka Y, Tashiro M. 2013. Genetic analysis of novel avian A(H7N9) influenza viruses isolated from patients in China, February to April 2013. Euro Surveill. 18:20453. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nidom CA, Takano R, Yamada S, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Daulay S, Aswadi D, Suzuki T, Suzuki Y, Shinya K, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Muramoto Y, Kawaoka Y. 2010. Influenza A (H5N1) viruses from pigs, Indonesia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16:1515–1523. 10.3201/eid1610.100508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chan MCW, Chan RWY, Chan LLY, Mok CKP, Hui KPY, Fong JHM, Tao KP, Poon LLM, Nicholls JM, Guan Y, Peiris JSM. 2013. Tropism and innate host responses of a novel avian influenza A H7N9 virus: an analysis of ex-vivo and in-vitro cultures of the human respiratory tract. Lancet Respir. Med. 1:534–542. 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70138-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jones JC, Baranovich T, Zaraket H, Guan Y, Shu Y, Webby RJ, Webster RG. 2013. Human H7N9 influenza A viruses replicate in swine respiratory tissue explants. J. Virol. 87:12496–12498. 10.1128/JVI.02499-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.van den Brand JM, Stittelaar KJ, van Amerongen G, Reperant L, de Waal L, Osterhaus AD, Kuiken T. 2012. Comparison of temporal and spatial dynamics of seasonal H3N2, pandemic H1N1 and highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus infections in ferrets. PLoS One 7:e42343. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rimmelzwaan GF, Kuiken T, van Amerongen G, Bestebroer TM, Fouchier RA, Osterhaus AD. 2001. Pathogenesis of influenza A (H5N1) virus infection in a primate model. J. Virol. 75:6687–6691. 10.1128/JVI.75.14.6687-6691.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Korteweg C, Gu J. 2008. Pathology, molecular biology, and pathogenesis of avian influenza A (H5N1) infection in humans. Am. J. Pathol. 172:1155–1170. 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.van Riel D, Rimmelzwaan GF, van Amerongen G, Osterhaus AD, Kuiken T. 2010. Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H7N7 isolated from a fatal human case causes respiratory disease in cats but does not spread systemically. Am. J. Pathol. 177:2185–2190. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]