Skip to main content
Journal of Gastric Cancer logoLink to Journal of Gastric Cancer
. 2014 Mar 31;14(1):63–66. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2014.14.1.63

Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Gastric Carcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri 1,, Fabio Carboni 1, Mario Valle 1, Paolo Visca 1, Alfredo Garofalo 1
PMCID: PMC3996252  PMID: 24765540

Abstract

We present a rare case of a gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine tumor and review the related English literature. A 77-year-old Caucasian woman was admitted to our department with nausea, anorexia, weight loss, and anemia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed a large (>7 cm) ulcerative mass in the greater curvature of the stomach. Biopsy showed the presence of an adenocarcinoma with moderate differentiation. The patient underwent D2 subtotal gastrectomy. Histopathological analysis revealed a diagnosis of mixed gastric adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma. The post-operative course was uneventful, and at the 6-month follow-up, the patient was alive without evidence of recurrence. Our review of the English literature suggested that such cases are most often reported from eastern countries. Multimodal treatment should be the aim for these patients because of the neuroendocrine component of the tumor.

Keywords: Stomach neoplasms, Mixed tumor, Collision tumor, Adenoneuroendocrine, Surgery

Introduction

Collision tumors with adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine elements are commonly diagnosed in the gastrointestinal tract. However, the occurrence of neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) in the gastrointestinal tract is rare, ranging from 1% in the esophagus, 0.2% in the colon, and 0.1% to 0.4% in the stomach.1 Herein, we present a case of a mixed adenoneuroendocrine gastric tumor and review the English literature pertaining to such tumors.

Case Report

A 77-year-old Caucasian woman was admitted to our department with nausea, anorexia, weight loss, and anemia. The medical history of the patient did not include any significant prior illness. The findings of physical examination were unremarkable. The patient's hemoglobin level (10.3 g/dl) and tumor marker levels (carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19.9, and carbohydrate antigen 72-4) were within the normal range. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a large (>7 cm) ulcerative mass (Borrmann type 3) in the greater curvature of the stomach. Biopsy showed the presence of an adenocarcinoma with moderate differentiation. Computed tomography did not show distant metastasis. The patient underwent D2 subtotal gastrectomy, with no surgical complications. Histopathological analysis showed, in agreement with the diagnosis of a mixed gastric adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (Fig. 1), that 30% of the tumor area was intensely positive for chromogranin (Fig. 2) and synaptophysin (Fig. 3), with part of it being tubular adenocarcinoma (G2) and of the rest being neuroendocrine large cell carcinoma (G3). The tumor penetrated the serosa, but none of the 29 regional lymph nodes showed metastasis and no distant metastasis was detected (pT4a, pN0, pM0, stage IIb according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification). The lymphatic and vascular lumina were not invaded, but perineural invasion was present. The post-operative course was uneventful. The patient underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of a combination of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and vincristine, and at the 6-month follow-up, the patient was alive without evidence of recurrence.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The tumor lesion is composed of two separated and different features (H&E, ×10).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Immunoreactivity of the mucosal and submucosal tumor cells for chromogranin (chromogranin, ×10).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Tumor cells of the neuroendocrine carcinoma stained positive for synaptophysin (synaptophysin, ×10).

Discussion

Collision tumors rarely occur in the gastrointestinal tract. Sporadic cases have been described, with less than 20 cases of such tumors in the stomach being reported, most often from eastern countries. The histological origin of composite tumors is unclear. Neuroendocrine tumors arise from embryonal neural crest cells, which are abundant in the epithelia of the gastrointestinal tract. In fact, some authors have postulated the proliferation of pluripotent precursor cells.2 Lewin and Appleman3 classified gastric cancer into five groups: carcinoma with interspersed neuroendocrine cells, composite glandular-endocrine carcinomas, collision tumors (present case), amphicrine tumors, and a combination of all the above. In 2005, Fujiyoshi et al.4 revised the classification of mixed endocrine and non-endocrine epithelial tumors. This new classification included six groups: neuroendocrine cells interspersed within carcinomas; carcinoids with interspersed non-endocrine cells; composite glandular-neuroendocrine cell carcinomas containing both areas of a carcinoid component and conventional carcinoma; collision tumors in which neuroendocrine tumors and conventional carcinoma are closely juxtaposed, but not admixed (present case); amphicrine tumors predominantly composed of cells exhibiting concurrent neuroendocrine and non-endocrine differentiation; and combinations of the previous types.4 In 2010, the World Health Organization classification of gastrointestinal tumors classified mixed tumors into three groups according to prognosis: high-grade malignant (mixed adenoma/adenocarcinoma-neuroendocrine carcinoma; present case), intermediate-grade malignant (mixed adenocarcinoma G1/G2 neuroendocrine tumor), low-grade malignant (adenoma-neuroendocrine tumor).5

We reviewed the English literature pertaining to gastric mixed tumors (Table 1)6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 and found that most such cases have been reported from eastern countries, probably because of the overall high incidence of gastric tumors in these countries. The 5-year survival rate is lower for these patients than for those with gastric adenocarcinoma. The neuroendocrine component may have a considerable impact on the prognosis.21 Because of the mixed component of the tumor, treatment should focus on parts of the tumor with the more aggressive cells. In cases of well-differentiated neuroendocrine components with benign or low-grade malignant behavior, chemotherapy should focus on the exocrine component. In contrast, in cases of small cell NEC or large cell NEC, the endocrine component should be the main target of the therapy.17

Table 1.

Review of the English literature pertaining to gastric collision tumors

graphic file with name jgc-14-63-i001.jpg

After radical surgical resection, a chemotherapy regimen consisting of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and vincristine is highly recommended.

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine tumors are rare, but they are now well classified. Multimodal treatment should be the aim for these patients because of the neuroendocrine component of the tumor.

References

  • 1.Jass JR, Sobin LH, Watanabe H. The World Health Organization's histologic classification of gastrointestinal tumors. A commentary on the second edition. Cancer. 1990;66:2162–2167. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901115)66:10<2162::aid-cncr2820661020>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee EJ, Park SM, Maeng L, Lee A, Kim KM. Composite glandular-endocrine cell carcinomas of the stomach: clinicopathologic and methylation study. APMIS. 2005;113:569–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2005.apm_190.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lewin KJ, Appleman HD. Endocrine cell proliferation of the stomach. In: Lewin KJ, Appelman DH, editors. Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Esophagus and Stomach. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1996. pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fujiyoshi Y, Kuhara H, Eimoto T. Composite glandular-endocrine cell carcinoma of the stomach. Report of two cases with goblet cell carcinoid component. Pathol Res Pract. 2005;200:823–829. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2004.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bosman TF, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on cancer (IARC); 2010. p. 13. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yamashina M, Flinner RA. Concurrent occurrence of adenocarcinoma and carcinoid tumor in the stomach: a composite tumor or collision tumors? Am J Clin Pathol. 1985;83:233–236. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/83.2.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chodankar CM, Pandit SP, Motiwale SS, Deodhar KP. Collision tumour of stomach. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1989;8:297–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Morishita Y, Tanaka T, Kato K, Kawamori T, Amano K, Funato T, et al. Gastric collision tumor (carcinoid and adenocarcinoma) with gastritis cystica profunda. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;115:1006–1010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Corsi A, Bosman C. Adenocarcinoma and atypical carcinoid: morphological study of a gastric collision-type tumour in the carcinoma-carcinoid spectrum. Ital J Gastroenterol. 1995;27:303–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Camuñas Mohinelo FA, Melgar Requena P, Martínez Zaragoza J, Estrada Caballero JL, Jiménez Torres MJ, Arroyo Guijarro A. Gastric collision tumor with osseous metaplasia. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1997;89:317–319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Morishita Y, Sugitani M, Sheikh A, Nemoto N, Fujii M, Takayama T. Collision tumor of the stomach: a rare case of an adenocarcinoma and carcinoid tumor. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:407–409. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-407-CTOTSA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jayaraman A, Ramesh S, Jeyasingh R, Bagyalakshmi KR. Gastric collision tumour--a case report. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2005;48:264–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jeong SW, Kim YS, Cho JY, Jung IS, Hong SJ, Ryu CB, et al. A case study of a gastric collision tumor with an adenocarcinoma and a carcinoid tumor. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;36:159–164. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mróz A, Kiedrowski M, Malinowska M, Sopyło R. Collision tumour of the stomach--adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma: case report and review of the literature. Pol J Pathol. 2009;60:94–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jang KY, Moon WS, Lee H, Kim CY, Park HS. Gastric collision tumor of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma--a case report. Pathol Res Pract. 2010;206:387–390. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2009.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Boşoteanu M, Boşoteanu C, Deacu M, Aşchie M. Morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of a gastric amphicrine tumor: differential diagnosis considerations. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011;52(1 Suppl):485–488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee HH, Jung CK, Jung ES, Song KY, Jeon HM, Park CH. Mixed exocrine and endocrine carcinoma in the stomach: a case report. J Gastric Cancer. 2011;11:122–125. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim JJ, Kim JY, Hur H, Cho YK, Han SU. Clinicopathologic significance of gastric adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features. J Gastric Cancer. 2011;11:195–199. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2011.11.4.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miguchi M, Iseki M, Shimatani K. Advanced gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma with an adenocarcinoma component. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2012;6:52–57. doi: 10.1159/000336320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pericleous M, Toumpanakis C, Lumgair H, Caplin ME, Morgan-Rowe L, Clark I, et al. Gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma with a trilineage cell differentiation: case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Oncol. 2012;5:313–319. doi: 10.1159/000339611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Elias D, Cavalcanti de Albuquerque A, Eggenspieler P, Plaud B, Ducreux M, Spielmann M, et al. Resection of liver metastases from a noncolorectal primary: indications and results based on 147 monocentric patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:487–493. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00225-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Gastric Cancer are provided here courtesy of Korean Gastric Cancer Association

RESOURCES