Table 4.
Comparison of morphometrics in parasitic females of Rubzovinema sp. and Rubzovinema ceratophylla.
| Character | Rubzovinema sp. (this study) | Rubzovinema ceratophylla [26] |
|---|---|---|
| N | 29 | 27 |
| L | 1278,6 (840–1570) | 1265,1 (810–1840) |
| D | 120,8 (85–145) | 137,3 (62–200) |
| A | 11,19 (7,9–16,1) | 9,51 (6,4–16,8) |
| C | 65,4 (31,4–100) | 44,10 (10–86,4) |
| V% | 96,4 (93,1–97,9) | 95,44 (92–98,9) |
| Total length of stylet (St) | 18,5 (14–22) | 19,5 (18–21) |
| Length of distal edge of stylet | 7,2 (5–8,7) | — |
| Distance between anterior end and excretory pore (Ex) | 20,7 (10–31) | — |
| Distance between anterior end and nerve ring | 61,2 (50–74,5) | |
| Total length of tail (Cd) | 21,9 (10–42) | 26,35 (14–47,5) |
| Distance between vulva and tail end | 46,1 (23–75) | — |
| Distance between vulva and anus (V–A) | 26,9 (13–40) | — |
All measurements are in μm and in the form mean (range).