Skip to main content
Human Reproduction Update logoLink to Human Reproduction Update
. 2014 Jan 8;20(3):309–333. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt058

Proceedings from the Third National Institutes of Health International Congress on Advances in Uterine Leiomyoma Research: comprehensive review, conference summary and future recommendations

James H Segars 1, Estella C Parrott 2, Joan D Nagel 3, Xiaoxiao Catherine Guo 1, Xiaohua Gao 4, Linda S Birnbaum 5, Vivian W Pinn 3,, Darlene Dixon 4,*
PMCID: PMC3999378  PMID: 24401287

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uterine fibroids are the most common gynecologic tumors in women of reproductive age yet the etiology and pathogenesis of these lesions remain poorly understood. Age, African ancestry, nulliparity and obesity have been identified as predisposing factors for uterine fibroids. Symptomatic tumors can cause excessive uterine bleeding, bladder dysfunction and pelvic pain, as well as associated reproductive disorders such as infertility, miscarriage and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Currently, there are limited noninvasive therapies for fibroids and no early intervention or prevention strategies are readily available. This review summarizes the advances in basic, applied and translational uterine fibroid research, in addition to current and proposed approaches to clinical management as presented at the ‘Advances in Uterine Leiomyoma Research: 3rd NIH International Congress’. Congress recommendations and a review of the fibroid literature are also reported.

METHODS

This review is a report of meeting proceedings, the resulting recommendations and a literature review of the subject.

RESULTS

The research data presented highlights the complexity of uterine fibroids and the convergence of ethnicity, race, genetics, epigenetics and environmental factors, including lifestyle and possible socioeconomic parameters on disease manifestation. The data presented suggest it is likely that the majority of women with uterine fibroids will have normal pregnancy outcomes; however, additional research is warranted. As an alternative to surgery, an effective long-term medical treatment for uterine fibroids should reduce heavy uterine bleeding and fibroid/uterine volume without excessive side effects. This goal has not been achieved and current treatments reduce symptoms only temporarily; however, a multi-disciplined approach to understanding the molecular origins and pathogenesis of uterine fibroids, as presented in this report, makes our quest for identifying novel targets for noninvasive, possibly nonsystemic and effective long-term treatment very promising.

CONCLUSIONS

The Congress facilitated the exchange of scientific information among members of the uterine leiomyoma research and health-care communities. While advances in research have deepened our knowledge of the pathobiology of fibroids, their etiology still remains incompletely understood. Further needs exist for determination of risk factors and initiation of preventive measures for fibroids, in addition to continued development of new medical and minimally invasive options for treatment.

Keywords: NIH conference summary and comprehensive review, uterine leiomyoma, fibroids, clinical treatment/basic research, conference recommendations

Introduction

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) along with other federal partners sponsored a two-day conference titled ‘Advances in Uterine Leiomyoma Research: 3rd NIH International Congress’ on 22 and 23 November 2010. This conference was the latest in a series of three NIH-wide meetings presenting research strategies to increase our knowledge and understanding of uterine leiomyomas, the biological processes that lead to their development and long-term sequelae, and present a clinical framework to address key issues related to disease burden, prevention and evidence-based treatment options (Newbold et al., 2000; Dixon et al., 2006). The meeting featured scientific presentations that summarized the current state of knowledge, concentrated on promising and innovative research, enhanced our understanding of the basic underpinnings of uterine leiomyoma pathophysiology and known risk factors for disease development, and focused on innovative treatment modalities. Since the first NIH conference in 1999, great strides have been made. Nevertheless, a dearth of information remains about a condition that causes significant reproductive morbidity. This article is a summary of the proceedings of the conference, and presents comprehensive reviews of the current progress in molecular and translational research, and clinical data on efficacy of medical, minimally invasive and surgical treatment modalities.

Overview of uterine fibroids

Molecular etiology and potential therapeutic targets for uterine fibroids

Uterine leiomyomas (i.e. fibroids, myomas, leiomyomata) occur in over 77% of all women and arise from the smooth muscle compartment (myometrium) of the uterus (Cramer and Patel, 1990). Uterine leiomyomas are clonal in origin, appear after menarche, typically grown during reproductive years and then stabilize or regress after menopause. These tumors remain benign, despite the fact that they can be numerous, large and are promoted by hormones. They are diagnosed in African American women three times more frequently than in Caucasian women (Marshall et al., 1997; Baird et al., 2003). Fibroids can induce abnormal uterine bleeding, bladder dysfunction and pelvic pain, in addition to associated reproductive disorders such as infertility, miscarriage and other adverse pregnancy outcomes (Hart et al., 2001; Surrey et al., 2001; Sheiner et al., 2004). Surgical procedures are of major concern, because uterine leiomyomas remain the primary indication for hysterectomy in women of reproductive age and account for >200 000 hysterectomies a year in the USA (Mauskopf et al., 2005). It has been estimated that uterine fibroids cost the USA $5.9–34.4 billion annually (Cardozo et al., 2012). Despite the fact that uterine leiomyomas represent the most common gynecologic tumor in women and constitute a significant public health concern, the mechanisms that initiate uterine leiomyoma growth and pathogenesis are still not completely understood.

It is compelling to appreciate the benign nature of uterine leiomyomas despite the fact that they are hormone responsive and can become quite large. Studies have shown that the phenotype of parturient myometrial cells and uterine leiomyomas is similar in terms of gene expression (Cesen-Cummings et al., 2000, 2003). These results have led to the suggestion that uterine leiomyomas are more similar to myometrial cells of pregnancy than to nongravid myometrial cells (Busnelli et al., 2010; Andersen and Barbieri, 1995). It has been noted that the increase in uterine weight during pregnancy is due to both hypertrophy and cellular proliferation of smooth muscle cells. The origin of the new smooth muscle cells may be from preexisting smooth muscles or the product of stem cell differentiation. Recently, myometrial stem cells found in a side population (SP) of myometrial cells (myoSP) have been identified in the nonpregnant uterus (Ono et al., 2007). Compared with the main population of myometrial cells, the myoSP reside in quiescence, have an undifferentiated phenotype and can replicate under low oxygen conditions into mature myometrial cells (Ono et al., 2007). Recent studies have confirmed the mesenchymal origin and undifferentiated nature of SP cells and have proposed that they are stem cells with characteristic features of tumor-initiating cells (Mas et al., 2012). It is suggested that they may be responsible for cell proliferation and tumor growth observed in fibroids (Ono et al., 2012).

Another hypothesis of uterine leiomyoma etiology takes into account phenotypic similarities between uterine leiomyomas and keloids, which may occur in response to wounds. A key observation is that both have disorganized collagen fibrils and decreased expression of dermatopontin that is similar to keloids (Catherino et al., 2004; Leppert et al., 2004). Keloids and uterine leiomyomas are more prevalent in African Americans, suggesting a common etiology. The transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and progesterone receptor signaling pathways have been considered important in fibroid growth and as potential therapeutic targets (Laping et al., 2007; Levens et al., 2008; Crabtree et al., 2009; Li et al., 2013). Since fibroids are hormone dependent, steroid hormone pathways have long been targets of investigation, in particular, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs). Clinical studies have shown that treatment with SPRMs, such as Mifepristone (Engman et al., 2009), CDB-2914 (Ulipristal) (Nieman et al., 2011), CDB-4124 (Luo et al., 2010), Asoprisnil (Yoshida et al., 2010) and CP-8947 (Catherino et al., 2010), generally decrease uterine leiomyoma size, increase primary apoptosis or inhibit cellular proliferation. Based on experimental models and clinical trials, caution is expressed in the use of some of the receptor modulators and inhibitors due to risk of cancer liability in other organs and/or cell types (Laping et al., 2007; Ioffe et al., 2009). Other novel therapeutic agents that are being evaluated for treatment of uterine leiomyoma include the antifibrotic drug halofuginone (Grudzien et al., 2010), gene therapy (Hassan et al., 2009), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Shushan et al., 2004, 2007; Islam et al., 2013), aromatase inhibitors (Bulun et al., 2005), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors (Shime et al., 2002), antiproliferative agents (Zhang et al., 2010a, b), vitamin D (Halder et al., 2013a, b), herbals (Li et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2013) and curcumin (Tsuiji et al., 2011). Next generation approaches to treatment of fibroids include the use of new drug delivery systems utilizing smart nanocarrier technology (Taylor and Leppert, 2012) and identification of epigenetic targets, such as DNA methylation sites (Navarro et al., 2012), microRNAs (Luo and Chegini, 2008) and histone modification enzymes (Wei et al., 2011) thought to play a role in uterine leiomyoma initiation and growth.

Genetic studies of uterine leiomyomas from a variety of populations have demonstrated translocations in the high mobility group (HMG) protein genes, specifically HMGA1 and HMGA2. Aberrant expression of HMGA2 may affect the expression of growth factors and growth inhibitors, fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) and p19 alternate reading frame (p19Arf), respectively. Moreover, the overexpression of HMGA2 in leiomyomas correlates with increased FGF2 levels and tumor size, and repression of the growth inhibitor factor p19Arf (Markowski et al., 2010a, b). More recently, mutations of the Mediator Complex Subunit 12 gene (MED12) have been reported in uterine leiomyomas from American women of varied ethnicities and racial backgrounds (McGuire et al., 2012), and in South African (Mäkinen et al., 2011a, b) and Finnish (Mäkinen et al., 2011a, b, 2013a, b) women. Mutations in MED12 appear to be common in exon 2, and Je et al. (2012) have shown that exon 2 mutations are tissue specific to uterine leiomyomas, rare in other tumors, and may contribute to the development of fibroids. Studies in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) allow examination of uterine leiomyomas that develop in the setting of a hereditary syndrome. These studies suggest that additional factors, such as germline mutations in fumarate hydratase (FH), play a role in the development of hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer, observed in a subset of leiomyomas (Toro et al., 2003). The risk of uterine fibroids in FH mutant-positive women with clinical HLRCC is significantly increased compared with women with no identifiable FH germline mutations (Stewart et al., 2008). Environmental factors are known contributors to many disorders and their relationship to fibroid growth and development are now becoming more apparent (Newbold et al., 2002; Cook et al., 2005; Moore et al., 2007; Di et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2010; Laughlin et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2010, 2012; Gao et al., 2012). Endocrine disruptors that may play a role in leiomyoma growth include developmental exposures to phthalates and DES (Baird and Newbold, 2005; Bredfeldt et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2010). Obesity is an established risk factor for fibroid development. Recent studies demonstrated that adiponectin can inhibit leiomyoma growth in culture (Wakabayashi et al., 2011). Thus, it is likely that both genetic and environmental factors differentially contribute to the development of uterine leiomyomas in selected populations of women. Early life exposure during the key developmental periods could reprogram the genome to predispose to leiomyoma (Greathouse et al., 2008; D'Aloisio et al., 2012; Chahine and Catherino, 2013).

Over the years, several animal models have been developed and are now available for investigating the etiology and possible therapies for fibroids, although each model has its own limitations. Therefore, one single animal model may not be applicable for all indications. The Eker rat model has similarities to the human disease and has been used extensively for studying fibroid development and growth (Cesen-Cummings et al., 2003). Newer innovative models that utilize xenografts of human uterine leiomyoma tumors (Suo et al., 2009a, b; Tsuiji et al., 2010), or human fibroid tumor explants transfected with adenoviral vectors for β-galactosidase, adenoviral-vascular endothelial growth factor-A, adenoviral-cyclooxygenase-2 (Hassan et al., 2008) and implanted into immune-compromised mice are also being used to study the pathogenesis of fibroids. Significant strides have been made with in vitro models, such as human leiomyoma cells immortalized with telomerase (Carney et al., 2002; Chang et al., 2009; Halder et al., 2013a, b) that retain many of the hallmarks of the parental cell lines (Carney et al., 2002), in addition to the use of other human leiomyoma cell lines immortalized with human papilloma virus (HPV-16 E6) (Malik et al., 2008). Tumor-derived cell lines from the Eker rat model (Howe et al., 1995) have also been used in many in vitro fibroid studies (Tsuiji et al., 2011; Tanfin and Breuiller-Fouche, 2012).

Treatment of uterine fibroids

Surgical tools to treat women with uterine fibroids have expanded dramatically in the last decade. Currently, there are four therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of fibroids: (i) Lupron; (ii) embolic agents for uterine artery embolization; (iii) magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound and (iv) robotic assisted surgery. Despite the advancement of minimally invasive surgical procedures, hysterectomy remains the mainstay of leiomyoma therapy.

Comparative data are lacking for surgical procedures such as hysterectomy and myomectomy, causing a serious dilemma for physicians when deciding upon the most effective therapy to recommend to patients. This is a particularly vital issue when reviewing clinical trials. Most of the randomized trials comparing uterine artery embolization with surgery took place outside of the USA. This arrangement excludes the distinctive aspect of diversity that would include racial and ethnic minorities unique to the USA. Assessing outcomes in large-scale observational and randomized trials is the core of determining efficacy. The 2007 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report on uterine leiomyomas included 106 studies to determine racial diversity in enrollment. Most studies did not report participation by race or ethnicity. Analyses of 22 of 25 studies where race was reported determined that African American representation was closer to 15% of all women in clinical trials. This percentage is an estimation of the proportion of African American women based on population demographics (Taran et al., 2010a, b). Notwithstanding the prevalence of uterine fibroids in the African American population, this population makes up a low percentage of all women in clinical trials.

Epidemiology, genetics and environment

Finding genes for uterine fibroids

Cytogenetic studies indicate that 60% of women diagnosed with fibroids have a normal karyotype (46, XX) while 40% have chromosomal abnormalities. Chromosomal abnormalities that have been associated with uterine leiomyoma development include trisomy 12, translocation involving chromosomes (t12; 14) (q14–q15; q23–q24), deletions on chromosome 7 (q22q32), 3q and 1p, and rearrangements of 6p21, 10q22 and 13q21–q22 (Hodge et al., 2012). The HMG gene, HGMA2, is often translocated to the der(14) in uterine leiomyomas. Fine mapping in the large Women's Genome Health Study which followed 25 000 women (Ridker et al., 2008), of which a subset were diagnosed with fibroids, discovered a peak signal on chromosome 17 that could be replicated in a cohort of Australian twins. It is now known that a haplogroup in chromosome 17 is likely to be important in predisposing women to uterine fibroid development (Moore et al., 2004).

Uterine fibroids and the exposure paradigm

In utero exposures may be associated with later onset of urologic and gynecologic diseases. In addition to in utero exposures, periconception and transgenerational exposures may play a role in disease development (Buck Louis and Sundaram, 2012). Examples of compounds where early or transgenerational exposures in experimental animal models are associated with later disease onset include diethylstilbestrol (DES) and bisphenol A (BPA). A review of the literature has shown that in animal models BPA and DES exposure have been associated with the development of fibroids (Newbold et al., 2002, 2007). Comparatively, human studies have shown that exposures to DES and phthalates can lead to fibroid development (D'Aloisio et al., 2010, 2012; Huang et al., 2010; Weuve et al., 2010). A proposed avenue of study has been defined as the ‘exposome’, which takes into account the exposures over a lifetime (Buck Louis and Sundaram, 2012). It was recommended that cumulative exposures, those defined as ‘inherited’ and ‘acquired’, be assessed and considered when evaluating risk factors associated with development of fibroids and in understanding etiology of the disease.

Epidemiologic insights into ethnic differences in uterine fibroid burden

Several studies have demonstrated that there are ethnic differences in fibroid burden (Kjerulff et al., 1996; Marshall et al., 1997; Baird et al., 2003; Moore et al., 2008; Peddada et al., 2008; Weiss et al., 2009). Previous results from the NIEHS Uterine Fibroid Study and others demonstrated that the cumulative incidence of fibroids is greater for blacks than whites (Baird et al., 2003; Viswanathan et al., 2007). It was noted that while the rate of increase in fibroid incidence was similar for black and white women, the onset of the disease is ∼10–15 years earlier in black females compared with white females (Borgfeldt and Andolf, 2000; Baird et al., 2003; Eskenazi et al., 2007; Bower et al., 2009; Laughlin et al., 2009, 2010). The NIEHS Fibroid Growth Study showed that there could be significant variation in fibroid growth rate over a 6-month period in black and white women (Peddada et al., 2008).

The risk factors that account for the ethnic differences in the natural history of fibroids are largely unknown. Vitamin D, which has been shown to be protective for breast cancer, is one proposed risk factor that is being evaluated for fibroids (Halder et al., 2011, 2012). In the NIEHS Uterine Fibroid Study, women were asked about sun exposure, which was then used as a surrogate for Vitamin D levels. When correlating women with defined sufficient Vitamin D levels to development of fibroids, a reduced incidence of ∼30% was observed in both black and white women, which suggests that adequate Vitamin D levels may be important in preventing fibroids. In addition to Vitamin D levels, other environmental risk factors that may be associated with fibroid development include diet (Radin et al., 2010; Wise et al., 2011), stress (Vines et al., 2010), reproductive tract infections, endocrine disruptors (Laughlin et al., 2010) and prenatal/early life exposures (Newbold et al., 2002, 2007; Cook et al., 2005; D'Aloisio et al., 2010, 2012).

Risk factors for uterine fibroids in the Black Women's Health Study

The Black Women's Health Study (BWHS) is a US prospective cohort study of almost 60 000 black women aged 21–69 years at baseline in 1995 (Wise et al., 2005a, b). An initial questionnaire was collected in 1995 and has been updated every 2 years since. The cohort retention rate has been >80%. Fibroids were diagnosed by ultrasound or surgery, and the cohort was restricted to premenopausal women at baseline. Published results showed that age, early menarche, years since last birth, being overweight, weight gain, polycystic ovary syndrome, alcohol and perceived racial discrimination were positively associated with fibroid development (Wise et al., 2004, 2005a, b, 2007). An inverse association was found with parity, age at birth of first child, age at first oral contraceptive use, use of progestin-only injectable contraceptives and cigarette smoking.

More recently, evaluations were conducted to test the hypothesis that high levels of exposure to estrogen during fetal or childhood development may affect later responses of the uterus to sex hormones, thereby influencing fibroid development. By linking the data from BWHS with Massachusetts Department of Public Health Registry of Vital Records for participants born in the state, some early life factors could be validated. When birth characteristics were evaluated in women with fibroids in the BWHS, positive associations between soy formula consumption and pre-term birth were not observed (Wise et al., 2010). These results are in contrast to the outcomes noted in the NIEHS Sister Study where low parental education (as a measure of childhood socioeconomic status) was positively associated with fibroid development in women younger than 35 years (D'Aloisio et al., 2010). Small positive associations were also found for young maternal age and first-born status.

As for dietary risk factors and fibroids, in the BWHS a 30% reduced risk of fibroids was observed in women that consumed four or more dairy products per day compared with women that consumed less than one product per day. An inverse association was noted in relation to intake of bioavailable calcium (expressed as a ratio: calcium: phosphorous) (Wise et al., 2010). Results evaluating the association of soy intake with fibroid development were limited due to low consumption rates and large confidence intervals. Fruit and vegetable intake also was associated with decreased risk, with the trend greater for fruits than vegetables. Lycopene and other carotenoids (e.g. beta-carotene) and vitamins (e.g. vitamin C) were not associated with decreased fibroid risk in the BWHS (Wise et al., 2011).

Race and fibroid tumor burden

In a study of racial differences in incidence and growth trends of fibroids, the growth rate of fibroids was assessed in women with and without contraceptive therapy and steroid hormone levels were measured in urine and serum. Criteria for inclusion in the study were leiomyoma ≥10 mm on ultrasound and age between 18 and 45 years. The cohort study start date involved 180 patients, 90 cases and 90 controls, which were monitored by ultrasound (mostly transvaginal) every 6 months for 2 years. However, subject retention for both black and white women in the study was very low, but more so among the black women (Sweet et al., 2008).

Analysis of the parameters evaluated at the initial visit for this study indicated significant differences in patient weight, BMI, uterine volume, number of fibroids, total fibroid volume, median fibroid volume and volume of largest fibroid. Comparison of growth trend values showed that uterine volume, number of fibroids, volume of largest fibroid and total fibroid volume remained consistently greater for African American women throughout the course of the study.

Pathogenesis: growth factors, cytokines, cell signaling and the extracellular matrix

Mediators and integrators of the molecular microenvironment in uterine fibroids

While the factors that initiate uterine fibroid formation are not known, excessive cell growth and phenotypic modifications due to myofibrotic transformation that enhance extracellular matrix deposition result in some of the characteristics of leiomyomas (Luo and Chegini, 2008). It is proposed that myofibrotic transformation to fibroids can occur as a result of mechanical injury (Rogers et al., 2008; Norian et al., 2012), inflammatory mediators or regulatory and signaling proteins including growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, angiogenic factors, hormones and extracellular proteinases [e.g. interleukin (IL)-10, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor-1] (Chegini, 2010). Microarray analyses of fibroids have identified no single common gene but increased or decreased expression of several genes including ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (ADAM17), E2F1, growth arrest-specific 1 (GAS1), early growth response 3 (EGR3), endothelial cell-specific molecule 1 (ESM1), extracellular matrix protein 2 (ECM2), insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), runt-related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3), tat-binding protein 1[TBP-1]-interacting protein (TBPIP), thrombospondin 1 (THBS1), cystatin E/M (CST6), fibulin 5 (FBLN5) and collagen, type XVIII, alpha 1 (COL18A1) (Tsibris et al., 2002; Ahn et al., 2003; Luo et al., 2007; Pan et al., 2007) have been found. The role these genes play in the development of leiomyoma and their interactions with cellular components and the molecular microenvironment are the basis of ongoing research.

Growth factor signaling pathways in uterine fibroids

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) can lead to activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK 1/2) and increased leiomyoma cell proliferation. Specifically, the roles of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) in stimulating ROS formation show that stimulation of the tyrosine kinase receptors increases ROS formation through phosphorylation of a subunit of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase (Mesquita et al., 2010) (see Table I). Treatment of leiomyoma cells with EGF or PDGF resulted in increased intracellular ROS levels that could be blocked by an NADPH oxidase inhibitor and interfered with EGF- and PDGF-induced cell proliferation (Mesquita et al., 2010). It is proposed that NADPH oxidase-derived ROS for growth factor signaling pathways may be a potential target for the treatment of fibroids.

Table I.

Proposed molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of uterine fibroids.

Molecular mechanism Leiomyoma cell growth effect Extracellular matrix (ECM) Cell line or model used Signaling/effectors
Growth factors
Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) Proliferation (+) (Yu et al., 2010) Fibroid tissue (Peng et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2010)
Human uterine leiomyoma(UtLM) cells (Yu et al., 2008)
Phospho (p)-AKTa activity (Peng et al., 2009)
RTKb and Shcc/Grb2d/MAPKe (Yu et al., 2008, 2010)
Transforming growth factor- beta (TGF-β) UtLM cells (Moore et al., 2010; Di et al., 2012) activin A and Smad3 (Di et al., 2012; Levens et al., 2005)
Smad 2 and 3; MAPK (Moore et al., 2010; Ding et al., 2004)
TGF-β3 Proliferation (+) (Lee and Nowak, 2001) Collagen 1A1 (+), fibronectin 1 (+) and CTGFf (+) (Joseph et al., 2010) Human uterine leiomyoma and myometrial tissues/cells (Norian et al., 2009; Tang et al., 1997; Joseph et al., 2010) Dual effects of TGF-β3 on the growth of uterine cells (Tang et al., 1997)
Glycosaminoglycan (GAG)-rich versican variants (Norian et al., 2009)
Epidermal growth factor (EGF) Proliferation (+) (Mesquita et al. 2010) Cultured leiomyoma smooth muscle cells (Mesquita et al., 2010) NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Mesquita et al., 2010)
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) (+) (Wolanska and Bankowski, 2006; Helmke et al., 2011) (+) (Wolanska and Bankowski, 2006 Human leiomyoma and myometrial tissues (Wolanska and Bankowski, 2006; Helmke et al., 2011) HMGA2 locus (Helmke et al., 2011)
Platlet-derived growth factor (PDGF) Proliferation (+) (Mesquita et al., 2010) Cultured leimyoma smooth muscle cells (Mesquita et al., 2010) NADPH oxidase-derived ROS (Mesquita et al., 2010)
PDGF C Proliferation (+) (Suo et al., 2009a) (+) (Suo et al., 2009a) Fibroid-derived uterine smooth muscle cells (Suo et al., 2009a) PDGF CC/PDGF receptor-alpha (Suo et al., 2009a)
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (+) (Lewicka et al., 2010) (+) Angiogenesis (Gentry et al., 2001)
Cytokines
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (+) PCNAh, cyclin D1, BCL-2i (Nair and Al-Hendy, 2011) Human leiomyoma cells cocultured with SW872 cells (Nair and Al-Hendy, 2011)
Interleukin (IL)-1 Polymorphism in IL-1 beta gene (Pietrowski et al., 2009)
IL-8 Myometrial and leiomyoma tissue (Senturk et al., 2001) Growth of myometrium adjacent to leiomyomas (Senturk et al., 2001)
Genomic/nongenomic
MicroRNA (miR)-21 Myometrial and leiomyoma tissues from patients (Fitzgerald et al., 2012b) Cellular apoptosis/proliferation and translation (Marsh et al., 2008; Zavadil et al., 2010; Fitzgerald et al., 2012)
miR-200c TIMP2j and FBLN5k (Chuang et al., 2012b) Ovarian steroids and the VEGFA signaling pathway (Chuang et al., 2012b)
Lethal 7 (Let-7) miR Proliferation (-) (Peng et al., 2008) Target gene HMGA2l (Wang et al., 2007; Peng et al., 2008)
miR-93/106b Human leiomyoma tissue and myometrium/cells (Chuang et al., 2012a) Tissue factor (F3), IL-8, CTGF and PAI-1m expression (Chuang et al., 2012)
Trimethylated lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3) Eker rats (Greathouse et al., 2012) Nongenomic PI3Kn/AKT signaling (Greathouse et al., 2012)
Mediator complex subunit 12 gene (MED12) Human leiomyomas (Mäkinen et al., 2011a, b, 2013a, b; Je et al., 2012; McGuire et al., 2012) Mutations of the MED12 (Mäkinen et al., 2011a, b, 2013a, b; Je et al., 2012; McGuire et al., 2012)
Genome-wide DNA methylation Human leiomyoma tissue (Navarro et al., 2012) Tumor suppressors KLF11o, DLEC1p and KRT19q and verified promoter hypermethylation (Navarro et al., 2012)
Whole-genome sequencing Human leiomyoma tissue (Mehine et al., 2013) Translocations of HMGA2 and RAD51Br loci; aberrations at COL4A5s-COL4A6t locus (Mehine et al., 2013)
Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) Uterine fibroid and myometrial tissues (Yu et al., 2008, 2010; Jiang et al., 2010) MAPK (Yu et al., 2010)

+refers to stimulation or increased expression, − refers to inhibition.

aSerine/threonine protein kinase Akt.

bReceptor tyrosine kinase.

cSrc homology/collagen.

dGrowth factor receptor-bound protein 2.

eMitogen-activated protein kinase.

fConnective tissue growth factor.

gMatrix metalloproteinase.

hProliferating cell nuclear antigen.

iB-cell lymphoma 2.

jTissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases 2.

kFibulin 5.

lHigh mobility group AT-hook 2.

mPlasminogen activator inhibitor-1.

nPhosphatidylinositide 3-kinase.

oKrüppel-like factor 11.

pDeleted in lung and esophageal cancer 1.

qKeratin 19.

rRAD51 homolog B.

sCollagen, Type IV, Alpha 5.

tCollagen, Type IV, Alpha 6.

Another pathway thought to be important in the pathogenesis of uterine fibroids is the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway that is activated by steroid hormones, growth factor receptors, other regulatory peptides and genomic and nongenomic signals (Makker et al., 2012). mTOR is a kinase that is downstream of receptor tyrosine kinases such as the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) and EGF receptors. Growth factor receptors can also mediate their effect through the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway and mTor is downstream of PI3K signaling. mTOR is thought to play a role in the development of some cancers (Dhingra et al., 2011) and transcriptional profiling has shown that mTOR is activated with a high frequency in human fibroids (Crabtree et al., 2009). Animal studies showed that treatment with rapalogs, which target mTOR, reduced tumor incidence, multiplicity and size (Crabtree et al., 2009). Recently, investigators have shown that in fibroids loss of the RE1-silencing transcription factor (REST), a silencer or transcriptional repressor, results in the expression of a G protein-coupled receptor, GPR10, which when activated promotes PI3K-AKt-mTOR/rapamycin pathways and cell proliferation (Varghese et al., 2013).

Regulation of growth factor signaling pathways in uterine fibroids by endogenous and environmental factors

Estrogen and progesterone influence leiomyoma growth through regulating growth factors and cytokines and their signaling pathways (Flake et al., 2003). Activation of steroid hormone receptors can have a myriad of effects including the regulation of growth factors and their receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) that can result in the activation of downstream effector proteins, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p44/42 (ERK1/2) (Yu et al., 2008, 2010) (see Tables I and II). Fibroids may also be targeted by environmental chemicals whose biological effects are mediated by hormone receptors (Di et al., 2008). Genomic events and nongenomic signaling in fibroids can result in ‘cross talk' between hormone and growth factor receptors with activation of the downstream effectors such as MAPK and phosphorylation of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) at serine 118 in fibroids (Swartz et al., 2005; Di et al., 2008; Hermon et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2010, 2012).

Table II.

Hormonal regulation and hormone receptor interactions in uterine fibroids.

Hormonal regulator Leiomyoma cell growth Extracellular matrix (ECM) Cell line or model Effector /signaling pathway
Estrogens
17-beta estradiol Cell cycle progression genes (+) (Yu et al., 2012), proliferation genes (+) (Yu et al., 2012) COL1A1 (+) (Yu et al., 2012) Human UtLM cells (Yu et al., 2012) ERαa/IGF-IRb/MAPKcp44/42 pathways (Yu et al., 2012)
Diethylstilbestrol (DES) PCNAd (+) (Newbold et al., 2002) CD-1 mice (Newbold et al., 2002) TGF-αe and EGF-Rf (Newbold et al., 2002)
Prenatal estrogen exposures (Newbold et al., 2002)
Genistein Proliferation (+) (Hunter et al., 1999; Moore et al., 2007; Di et al., 2008)
PCNA (+) (Moore et al., 2007), apoptosis (+) (Moore et al., 2007)
ELTg3 and ELT6 rat uterine leiomyoma cell lines (Hunter et al., 1999);
Human uterine leiomyoma (UtLM) cells (Moore et al., 2007; Di et al. 2008)
Mimics endogenous estrogens (Hunter et al., 1999)
Lower concentrations elicit proliferation, higher concentrations inhibit proliferation (Moore et al., 2007)
ERKh/MAPK pathway (Di et al., 2008)
Estrogen Receptors
Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) Proliferation (+) (Hunter et al., 1999; Glace et al., 2009; Di et al., 2008) ELT3 cells (Hunter et al., 1999; Glace et al., 2009)
UtLM cells (Di et al., 2008)
Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1/Cxcl12) (Glace et al., 2009)
MAPK (Di et al., 2008)
ERα phospho-serine118 PCNA (+) (Hermon et al., 2008) Human leiomyoma and myometrial tissues (Hermon et al., 2008) MAPK activation (Hermon et al., 2008)
ER-beta (ERβ) Leiomyoma and myometrial tissue samples (Grings et al., 2012; Bakas et al., 2008) Overexpression of ERα, ERβ are not the cause of tumor growth (Grings et al., 2012)
ERα/ERβ expression ratio (Bakas et al., 2008)
G protein-coupled receptor 10 (GPR10) Proliferation (+) (Varghese et al., 2013) Human leiomyoma cells and tissue/mice (Varghese et al., 2013) GPR10 when activated promotes PI3Ki-Aktj-mTORk pathways (Varghese et al., 2013)
Progesterone Proliferation (+) (Ishikawa et al., 2010) Leiomyoma xenografts (Ishikawa et al., 2010)
ELT3 (Glace et al., 2009)
L-type amino acid transporter 2 and 4F2hc (Luo et al., 2009)
Cell numbers (+) (Hoekstra et al., 2009) Progestin/cultured uterine leiomyoma cells (Hoekstra et al., 2009) Phospho(Ser 256)-FOXO1, phosphoglycogen synthase kinase-3b, and AKT pathway (Hoekstra et al., 2009)
PCNA (+) (Maruo et al., 2000) EGF and Bcl-2l (Maruo et al., 2000)
Progesterone receptor Human uterine leiomyoma smooth muscle cells (Yin et al., 2010; Yin et al., 2012) KLF11m (Kim and Sefton, 2012 Yin et al., 2010)
Selective estrogen receptor modulaors (SERMs) Tamoxifen (−), raloxifene (−) (Walker et al., 2000; Walker, 2002) Reduce tumor size (Walker et al., 2000) Eker rats (Walker et al., 2000)
Leiomyoma-derived ELT cell lines (Fuchs-Young et al., 1996)
Reduce tumor incidence (Walker, 2002)
High affinity to ERα and β (Hummel et al., 2005)
Tissue-specific estrogen agonist or antagonist effects (Cook and Walker, 2004)
Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) CP8947 (−) (Catherino et al., 2010)
CDB-2914 (−) (Yoshida et al., 2010)
CDB4124 (−) (Luo et al., 2010)
Immortalized human leiomyoma and myometrial cells (Catherino et al., 2010) Apoptosis (−) (Roeder et al., 2011)
KLF11 (Luo et al., 2010)
Glucocorticoid Proliferation (−) (Whirledge et al., 2012) Immortalized human uterine leiomyoma cells (Whirledge et al., 2012) Reduces S-phase cells (Whirledge et al., 2012)
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) Leiomyoma and myometrial tissues/cells (Parker, 2007; McCarthy-Keith et al., 2011) GnRH agonist decreases NFAT5n expression (McCarthy-Keith et al., 2011)
Vitamin D Proliferation (−) (Sharan et al., 2011) (−) Collagen type 1, and fibronectin (Halder et al., 2013b) Immortalized human uterine leiomyoma cells (Halder et al., 2011)
Eker rats (Halder et al., 2012)
Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) protein (Sharan et al., 2011)
Retinoic acid (RA) Proliferation (−) (Gilden et al., 2012) (−) (Gilden et al., 2012) Immortalized leiomyoma cells (Gilden et al., 2012) RA and PI3K/Akt pathways (Ben-Sasson et al., 2011)

+ refers to stimulation or increased expression, − refers to inhibition or decreased expression.

aEstrogen receptor alpha.

bInsulin-like growth factor I receptor.

cMitogen-activated protein kinase.

dProliferating cell nuclear antigen.

eTransforming growth factor-alpha.

fEpidermal growth factor receptor.

gEker rat leiomyomas.

hExtracellular signal-regulated kinase.

iPhosphatidylinositide 3-kinase.

jSerine/threonine protein kinase Akt.

kMammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR).

lB-cell lymphoma 2.

mKrüppel-like factor 11.

nNuclear factors of activated T cells.

Environmental estrogens derived from natural plant compounds (phytoestrogens), synthetic and industrial by-products (industrial estrogens) have been found to increase the incidence of uterine leiomyomas in animal models (Newbold et al., 2002, 2007). Both in vivo and in vitro models have shown that the enhanced sensitivity of uterine leiomyomas to environmental estrogens can be modulated via ERα (Di et al., 2008; Greathouse et al., 2012). Genistein, a soy-derived phytoestrogen, is commonly consumed in the diet, and there is some concern as to the beneficial and/or adverse physiological effects of this compound. It has been found that human UtLM cells proliferate in response to a low dose of genistein treatment, whereas high doses are inhibitory (Moore et al., 2007; Di et al., 2008, 2012). Growth factor receptor pathways, such as the RTK, IGF-I receptor, are important in uterine leiomyoma cell regulation and growth and could represent possible targets for fibroid treatment (Yu et al., 2008, 2012). By identifying environmental risk factors and delineating molecular signaling mechanisms and novel proteins activated in fibroids during their growth, it is possible to develop preventive measures and nonsurgical treatment strategies that target unique molecules important in fibroids.

Hormonal regulation and hormone receptor interactions

Studies suggest that estrogen and progesterone act in combination to stimulate myoma growth (Shimomura et al., 1998; Maruo et al., 2004) (see Table II). Specifically, progesterone stimulates EGF production while estrogen stimulates EGF receptor production. Since myoma growth is a balance between cell proliferation and apoptosis, the effects of progesterone on apoptosis have been shown to increase the expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 (B-cell lymphoma 2) in cultured leiomyoma cells (Matsuo et al., 1997; Luo et al., 2005); however, estradiol has no effect. Additionally, progesterone has been found to inhibit the expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), an apoptosis-inducing factor and IGF-I expression in cultured leiomyoma cells (Kurachi et al., 2001).

In vitro studies have shown that progesterone increases cellular proliferation of uterine leiomyoma cells (Shimomura et al., 1998; Ishikawa et al., 2010). Progesterone receptors are proposed to produce effects through interaction with progesterone elements that can modulate transcription of genes or through interaction with membrane signaling components to modulate second messenger systems (Yin et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2009; Kim and Sefton, 2012) (see Table II).

While SERMs have questionable efficacy (Deng et al., 2012), aromatase and selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) have been more encouraging. Two SPRMs, CP8863 and CP8947, both have been found to increase alkaline phosphatase activity in leiomyoma cells and inhibit cell growth (Catherino et al., 2010) (see Table II). SPRMs can induce leiomyoma inhibition in a cell-specific manner through decreased cellular proliferation and increased apoptosis in in vitro studies (Yoshida et al., 2010). Some SPRMs have been shown to decrease the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1, VEGFR-2, adrenomedullin (ADM) and ADM receptor (ADMR) selectively in uterine leiomyoma cells when compared with myometrial cells (Xu et al., 2006), and suggests that progesterone receptor modulators may selectively suppress angiogensis in leiomyomas. Also, SPRMS have been reported to cause enhanced expression of extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation factors (extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer [EMMPRIN] and matrix metalloproteinase [MMP]-1 and MMP-2) in a cell-type specific manner (Xu et al., 2008). It is proposed that the use of a progesterone receptor modulator IUD could be utilized in the management of fibroid growth and menorrhagia associated with fibroids (Maruo et al., 2001).

Pilot trials have found that administration of aromatase inhibitors decreases fibroid size (Shozu et al., 2003, 2004; Varelas et al., 2007; Gurates et al., 2008; Parsanezhad et al., 2010). Aromatase inhibitors have also been reported to interfere with estrogen synthesis in situ in fibroids, thereby reducing estrogen levels within a fibroid tumor (Shozu et al., 2004). Recent studies have shown that aromatase levels are significantly higher in leiomyomas from African American, Caucasian American and Japanese women when compared with myometrial tissues, and aromatase levels were much higher in leiomyomas from African American women when compared with the other two racial groups of women (Ishikawa et al., 2009). These results suggest that biological differences can be identified for better targeting of medications and that differences do exist between populations.

GnRH agonists or antagonists act at the pituitary level resulting in a decrease in gonadotrophin production, which produces a hypoestrogenic state. While these compounds ultimately decrease leiomyoma size, they do produce numerous side effects. Microarray analyses have shown that specific collagen isoforms and veriscan, which contains high levels of proteoglycans which absorb water, are overexpressed in leiomyoma cells and addition of GnRH analogs can reduce their expression (Malik and Catherino, 2007; Parker, 2007; Britten et al., 2012) (see Table II). Conversely, while MMPs are not highly overexpressed in leiomyoma cells, addition of GnRH analogs increases their expression. It has been proposed that the therapeutic effects of GnRH analogs are through direct effects on leiomyomas (e.g. decreased veriscan production leads to decreased water retention in the fibroid tumors which decreases the size). Therefore, studies are progressing towards examining whether compounds, such as GnRH analogs, which appear to have direct effects on fibroid tumors could be applied locally (e.g. IUD) rather than through systemic administration, thus providing safer, targeted treatment options without affecting the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis.

Developing new model systems

Green tea extract for the treatment of uterine fibroids

Catechol-O-methyltranferase (COMT) is involved in metabolizing estrogens, by methylation of the catechol-estrogens 2- and 4-hydroxyestradiol. The catechol estrogens are anti-estrogenic, but conversion to the methoxy counterparts increases the estrogenic milieu. Evaluation of leiomyoma tissues showed that COMT RNA and protein levels are increased in leiomyomas when compared with myometrial tissues (Al-Hendy and Salama, 2006). Genetic evaluation shows the presence of a single nucleotide polymorphism at site 158, a Val/Met site, in the COMT gene. In a Val/Val genotype, high enzyme activity is observed. When compared with the Met/Met activity, the Val/Val genotype is approximately four times greater. When the distribution of these two genotypes was evaluated in different ethnic groups, it was consistently shown that the Val/Val genotype was associated with increased risk of fibroids. In general, the Val/Val genotype was highly prevalent in the African American women. Therefore, one potential treatment avenue for fibroids is inhibition of COMT (Hassan et al., 2011) (see Table III). To date, some COMT drugs are available for use in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Table III.

Model system/concepts for studying uterine fibroids.

Model system Tumor/cell characteristics Time to tumor development Model characteristics Application
In vitro models
Human uterine leiomyoma cells ERαa (+), ERβb (+) (Di et al., 2008)
Receptor tyrosine kinases (+) (Yu et al., 2010)
Human cell lines Molecular mechanisms of environmental estrogens (Di et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2008, 2010; Gao et al., 2010; Gao et al., 2012)
Htert-human uterine leiomyoma cells ERα and PRc (+) (Carney et al., 2002)
Glucocoticoid receptor (+) (Whirledge et al., 2012)
Human telomerase immortalized leiomyoma and myometrial cell lines (Carney et al., 2002) Molecular mechanisms of fibroid cell growth and inhibition (Whirledge et al., 2012)
3D in vitro model Immortalized cells of patient-matched myometrium and leiomyoma (Malik and Catherino, 2012) Assessing the mechanism of aberrant ECM formation, effectiveness of potential therapies (Malik and Catherino, 2012)
Eker leiomyoma tumor-derived (ELT) 3 cells 4–8 weeks in nude mice (Zhang et al., 2010b); approximately 4 weeks in nude mice (Salama et al., 2007) Eker rat leiomyoma tumor cells defect in Tsc2e tumor suppressor gene (Howe et al., 1995) Green Tea Therapy (Zhang et al., 2010b)
Cdkd4 (+) (Zhang et al., 2010a, b)
In vivo models
Eker rat High frequency (∼65% or >) in females (Everitt et al., 1995) 12 months or > (Everitt et al., 1995) Defect in the Tsc2 tumor suppressor gene (Crabtree et al. 2009) Assessing COMTf inhibitor (Hassan et al., 2011)
Rapamycin pathway (Crabtree et al., 2009)
Guinea pig 8.4% incidence (Field et al., 1989) 47.6 months (Field et al., 1989) Spontaneous reproductive tract tumor in aged female guinea pigs (Field et al., 1989)
Miniature pet pigs <1 cm in diameter to as large as 35 × 30 × 40 cm (Ilha et al., 2010) 4 months to 19 years (Ilha et al., 2010) ER and PR positive (Ilha et al., 2010) Aging was associated with the development of uterine lesions (Ilha et al., 2010)
Pot bellied pig Tumors ranged from microscopic to 45 kg, multiple (Mozzachio et al., 2004) Possibly 5 years and > (Mozzachio et al., 2004) Smooth muscle actin (+) and has collagenous component (Mozzachio et al., 2004) Valuable animal model for studying human fibroids (Mozzachio et al., 2004)
Japanese quail 350 days (Sahin et al., 2009b)
315 days (Sahin et al., 2009a)
Dietary supplementation of genistein (Sahin et al., 2009a)
Dietary zinc picolinate supplementation (Sahin et al., 2009b)
CD-1 mice PCNAg (+), TGF-αh(+) EGF-Ri (+) (Newbold et al., 2002) 13 or 17 months (Newbold et al., 2002) Pre- and perinatal exposures to diethylstibesterol (DES) (Newbold et al., 2002)
Calcium-binding protein (CaBP)9 K/Tagj transgenic mice 2.5–3 (shortest) months or >6 months (longest) (Romagnolo et al., 1996) 9 K/-117-Tag and 9 K/-1011-Tag (Romagnolo et al., 1996) Therapeutic approaches to fibroids (Romagnolo et al., 1996)
Transplanted fibroid cells in mice (xenografts) Bioluminescence (BL)-based whole animal imaging (Suo et al., 2009b);
ERα (+) (Ishikawa et al., 2010)
BL signal peaked at 28 days (Suo et al., 2009b)
10 weeks (Ishikawa et al., 2010)
Implantation of 17β-estradiol-releasing pellets in the recipient mice, fibroid tissues have higher engraftment potential (Suo et al., 2009b) Freshly dissociated fibroid cells can generate stable xenografts in subcutaneous Matrigel implants (Suo et al., 2009b)
Progesterone dependent (Ishikawa et al., 2010)
Immunodeficient (NOD/SCID/gammac-null: NOG) mice Ki-67 proliferation marker (+), (Tsuiji et al., 2010) 4 or 8 weeks (Tsuiji et al., 2010) Development of novel therapeutic strategies (Tsuiji et al., 2010)
Adenovirus-enhanced human fibroid explants Ki-67 proliferation marker (+), ER (+), PR (+) (Hassan et al., 2008) 30 days post-implantation (Hassan et al., 2008) Adenoviral- cyclooxygenase-2 and adenoviral-VEGF-Ak transfection in immunodeficient mice (Hassan et al., 2008) A novel model for human uterine leiomyoma (Hassan et al., 2008)
Beta-catenin mice TGFβ3l (+) (Tanwar et al., 2009) 4 weeks (Tanwar et al., 2009) Activated beta-catenin in uterine mesenchyme by Cre recombinase knocked into the Müllerian-inhibiting substance type II receptor promoter (Tanwar et al., 2009) WNTm/beta-catenin signaling (Tanwar et al., 2009)
Stem cells
Human uterine leiomyomas CDn90+/− (Chang et al., 2010) Stem/reservoir cell characteristics (Chang et al., 2010) Separate origins and/or divergent transformation pathways for ULMo and ULMSp (Danielson et al., 2010)
Leiomyoma-derived side population (LMSP) stem/reservoir cells Comprise ∼1% of all leiomyoma- and 2% of myometrium-derived cells (Ono et al., 2012) mRNA levels for ERα and PR are minimally detectable in LMSP cells (Ono et al., 2012) Stem/reservoir cell characteristics, are necessary for in vivo growth of leiomyoma xenograft tumors (Ono et al., 2012)

aEstrogen receptor alpha.

bEstrogen receptor beta.

cProgesterone receptor.

dCyclin-dependent kinases.

eTuberous sclerosis complex 2.

fCatechol-O-methyltransferase.

gProliferating cell nuclear antigen.

hTransfroming growth factor-alpha.

iEpidermal growth factor receptor.

jSimian virus 40 large T Antigen.

kVascular endothelial growth factor-A.

lTransfroming growth factor beta 3.

mWingless-type MMTV integration site family.

nCluster of Differentiation.

oLeiomyoma.

pLeiomyosarcoma.

Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), an extract of the green tea, is a COMT inhibitor. In vitro, EGCG dose dependently decreases PCNA labeling and increases apoptosis factors, such as bcl-2 (Zhang et al., 2010a, b). Cell cycle studies show that EGCG increases the percentage of cells in G2/M phase. In vivo studies in nude mice injected s.c. with Eker rat tumor-derived uterine leiomyoma (ELT)-3 cells show that EGCG treatment decreased tumor size when compared with water. EGCG also arrested growth and decreased uterine leiomyoma size in Eker rats as early as 2 weeks after treatment initiation. Clinical trials have been initiated to evaluate the effects of EGCG in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas (Roshdy et al., 2013).

Uterine β-catenin mouse model for uterine fibroids

β-catenin plays two roles in the cell, one role is at the adherens junctions, the other is as a downstream effector of Wnt signaling (Tanwar et al., 2009). Mice with a mesenchymal deletion of β-catenin at 6 weeks of age develop an increase in adipocytes on the surface of the uterus, and after 10 weeks post-natal, there is little myometrium remaining. It appears that β-catenin levels are diminished in the uterus and the muscle cells convert to adipocytes.

In an in vivo mouse model that accumulates β-catenin in the cell nucleus there is an increase in the myometrium when compared with controls (Tanwar et al., 2009) (see Table III). Examination of these mice after a few weeks showed large uterine protrusions that upon histologic examination are similar (e.g. progesterone receptor expression) to leiomyomas present in women. The lesions also have high levels of mTOR, and a downstream target of mTOR, phospho-S6-kinase, indicating increased activity of mTOR is present in these mutant mice. The control of mTOR is by the tuberous sclerosis complex, Tsc1 and Tsc2. In the Eker rat model, Tsc2 is mutated. It is proposed that the constitutive action of β-catenin, which induces mTOR expression and activity, mimics mutations in Tsc1 and Tsc2. It also has been shown that in rats and humans, the downstream targets of mTOR are up-regulated in leiomyomas (Crabtree et al., 2009). Therefore, the constitutive activation of β-catenin mimics the end-points observed in humans.

Mouse xenograft model for human uterine fibroids

A xenograft model has been developed to evaluate the cellular mechanisms underlying fibroid growth regulation by estrogen and progesterone (Ishikawa et al., 2010) (see Table III). In this model, human leiomyoma tumors are grafted subrenally. The xenografts retain histological characteristics of the original tumor and grow in response to estrogen and progesterone. Removal of the steroid hormones leads to decreased tumor size, which is associated with reduced cell size. Studies have shown that progesterone receptor expression in human leiomyoma is dependent on the presence of estrogen (Englund et al., 1998), and based on this observation it was proposed that progesterone's action requires estrogen.

Advances in clinical and translational research

Opportunities and challenges in identification of new treatment modalities for uterine fibroid therapy

Disease and pharmacodynamic models that are required to validate targets and screen profile novel drug candidates should be clinically relevant and feasible. To assess treatment options, a toolbox of in vitro models is needed to assess efficacy. However, there are a limited number of in vitro models that can be used for this purpose. The limited number of models available reflects their complexity, as well as the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms that remains incompletely understood. There are currently two treatment paradigms: hormonal and nonhormonal. Most treatments have favored the hormonal paradigm; however, recently anti-fibrotic, anti-proliferation, anti-angiogenesis, anti-hypertrophy and anti-inflammatory small drug compounds are being evaluated as potential therapeutics. Therefore, additional efforts are needed to develop in vitro models to assess therapeutic options for uterine fibroids.

Target identification is the first step in developing an appropriate therapeutic agent for treatment of uterine fibroids. Sources used for target identification include results from microarray analysis, protein expression studies, the literature and personal communications. In vitro and in vivo models are used to validate the target, for pharmacodynamic studies and safety assessment. Prior to development of a lead compound, specific properties must be developed or evaluated, and this includes patentability, safety, selectivity, production costs and formulation.

Pregnancy loss and uterine fibroids

To address the challenges of studying early pregnancy loss, the Right from the Start (RFTS) study (Promislow et al., 2004) was developed to investigate the association of uterine fibroids with adverse pregnancy events in a nonclinical, prospective cohort with uterine fibroids. The RFTS study evaluated women with uterine fibroids to determine whether they were at higher risk of spontaneous abortion or preterm birth; whether size or location of fibroid was associated with the risk and whether there was a delayed time to conception as a potential surrogate for impaired fertility. Within the study population, the risk of spontaneous abortion increased with age and BMI. Small uterine fibroids (<3 cm) and those located submucosally increased the risk of spontaneous abortions slightly. In comparison, larger fibroids and those located subserously or intramurally did not increase the risk of pregnancy loss. The presence of uterine fibroids did not increase the risk of preterm birth in the study population. Additionally, subserous and submucosal fibroids slightly increased the risk of pre-term birth. The mean time to conception was similar between women with and without uterine fibroids. African American women were more likely to have a uterine fibroid, to have more than one fibroid, and to have a larger uterine fibroid than their Caucasian counterparts.

Based on this population-based sample, it was concluded that the presence of uterine fibroids is not independently associated with delays in conception or increased risk of miscarriage or preterm birth. While there was no evidence that larger or subserous uterine fibroids have a profound influence on risk, smaller intramural and submucous uterine fibroids may require additional evaluation. Based on these findings, it is likely that the majority of women with uterine fibroids will have normal pregnancy outcomes. To confirm these results and given the limited research on the effects of uterine fibroids on pregnancy outcomes, additional research is warranted (Laughlin et al., 2009).

Stem cell origin of fibroids and effects of resveratrol

Collagen is the predominant extracellular matrix component expressed in fibroids, and its expression is influenced by cytokines, estradiol and growth factors (Flake et al., 2003; Walker and Stewart, 2005; Ciarmela et al., 2011). Studies have shown that within the uterus there is a SP of stem cells that is multipotent (Flake et al., 2003; Walker and Stewart, 2005; Ono et al., 2007, 2012; Ciarmela et al., 2011; Mas et al., 2012). These stem cells can spontaneously differentiate into muscle cells in vitro and can differentiate into other tissues, including reconstituting into myometrial cells in vivo. A study was undertaken to determine whether there were stem cells present in uterine leiomyomas and myometrium. Samples were obtained from hysterectomies for routine indications. Results showed that myometrium from uterine fibroids contain more stem cells than myometrium from a normal uterus suggesting that an increased density of stem cells may be associated with uterine fibroids. Mas et al. (2012) have further characterized leiomyoma stem cells or SP cell lines that have a normal karyotype and express genes of undifferentiation, such as OCT-4 (octamer-binding transcription factor 4), NANOG, DNMT3B [DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3 beta] and GDF3 (growth differentiation factor-3). These cells also have markers of mesenchymal differentiation and establish tissue populations in ∼8 weeks that histologically resemble human leiomyomas when grown in NOD-SCID mice in the presence of E2 and P4 (Mas et al., 2012). Further research is needed to investigate the role of stem cells in the pathophysiology of uterine leiomyomas.

Resveratrol, a dietary phytoalexin and a component of red wine, has been shown in studies of uterine leiomyoma cells to increase formation of apoptotic cells, decrease cell viability and number, and increase the percentage of cells arrested in the G1 phase in a dose-dependent manner by preventing cell cycle progression from the G1 to S phase (Catherino et al., 2011). Studies also revealed that resveratrol possesses a potent antifibrogenic effect by reducing the mRNA production and protein expression of collagen types III and I in a dose-dependent manner in vitro (Catherino et al., 2011). Resveratrol also altered the TGF-β/Smad pathway, and this impairment contributed to a reduction in collagen production. This research suggests that resveratrol might prove to be an effective and novel preventive agent due to its ability to reduce collagen production, induce apoptosis and reduce cellular proliferation in uterine leiomyoma cells.

Clinical advances in the treatment of uterine fibroids

Women wishing to preserve their fertility are opting for uterine preservation and minimally invasive approaches. Myomectomy has been the mainstay for women who wish to preserve their fertility. To find a better way to manage uterine fibroids, several new minimally invasive surgical techniques are available or in development. Robotic methods have been used in recent years in an attempt to provide a less invasive surgical option for women. Generally, limitations of robotic surgery include lack of haptic feedback, larger port sizes and increased operating time during the steep learning curve. There are limited studies on the comparison of robotic procedures with laparoscopic procedures for hysterectomy for benign disease. In one study of surgical outcomes in a community practice, a comparison of 100 laparoscopic hysterectomies and 100 robotic hysterectomies (Payne and Dauterive, 2008) showed that operating times, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay and conversion to open surgery were lower for robotic hysterectomy than for laparoscopic surgery. However, the cost of robotic hysterectomy remains a significant limiting factor (Pasic et al., 2010; Sarlos et al., 2010).

One retrospective study compared 15 robotic myomectomies with 35 laparoscopic myomectomies (Nezhat et al., 2009). The robotic technique removed fibroids that were fewer, smaller and lighter when compared with those removed using a laparoscopic technique, similar to what had been reported in other studies (Advincula et al., 2007; Bedient et al., 2009), although the difference was not significant. When compared with abdominal myomectomy, robotic myomectomy had less blood loss and shorter hospital stays, but longer operative time (Advincula et al., 2007; Sarlos et al., 2010). Robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery continue to advance rapidly with trends toward single port access surgery, image guidance and networking with other consoles during surgery. More data are needed on long-term clinical outcomes, especially as it pertains to fertility and pregnancy outcomes, particularly for robotic myomectomy.

When laparoendoscopic single site surgery was compared with traditional laparoscopic procedures, a retrospective comparative analysis showed that recovery time was better and immediate post-operative pain was lower with single site surgery (Yim et al., 2010). Laparoscopic uterine artery ligation/occlusion under Doppler guidance is a surgical procedure that results in infarction and necrosis of uterine fibroids. The procedure appears to have no impact on ovarian reserve, although there are no data on fertility or pregnancy post-operatively (Brill, 2009; Qu et al., 2010). A randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing laparoscopic uterine artery ligation/occlusion with uterine artery embolization demonstrated a greater decrease in the uterine size, more complete devascularization of uterine fibroids and lower symptom recurrence rate with uterine artery embolization (Hald et al., 2009). On the farthest frontier is natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). The procedure is performed on pelvic organs via a single-puncture transgastric approach, thereby eliminating all incisions and making the pelvic organs accessible from the gastric approach. Animal studies have shown some promise (Mintz et al., 2007).

Clinical management and therapeutic options

Medical treatment options for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids

RCTs of medical treatments were few, and many do not emphasize symptoms (Makarainen and Ylikorkala, 1986; Coutinho and Goncalves, 1989; Friedman et al., 1989). Current options are high-dose progestins, oral contraceptive pills (OCPS), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), tranexamic acid and GnRH agonists (GnRHa) (see Table IV). For short-term management of symptoms, such as heavy uterine bleeding, progestins, NSAIDs and OCPs have been used off-label; however, they do not reduce fibroid volume (Stewart, 2001). GnRHa successfully reduce fibroid volume and induce amenorrhea, but may only be used preoperatively due to side effects of estrogen deprivation. No add-back therapy for GnRHa has been effective. For the treatment of women with cyclic heavy menstrual bleeding with or without uterine fibroids, tranexamic acid, a plasminogen inhibitor, has been recently approved by the FDA (Lukes et al., 2010).

Table IV.

Effect of drugs on symptoms for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.

Drug Decrease in fibroid sizea Decrease in bleedinga Amenorrheaa Adverse events
GnRHa 30–65% (Stewart, 2001; Olive et al., 2004; Parker, 2007a, b; Somigliana et al., 2007; Ezzati et al., 2009; Cook et al., 2010; Donnez et al., 2012a, b; Nodler and Segars, 2013)
Improved symptoms 64% (Parker et al., 2007a, b)
89% (Donnez et al., 2012a, b) Up to 97% (Nodler and Segars, 2013; Parker, 2007a, b) Bone loss, hot flashes, vaginal dryness, headache (Parker, 2007a, b)
Mifepristone
Levonorgestrel IUD (LNG-IUS)
30–57% (Cook et al., 2010; Esteve et al., 2012; Chwalisz and Winkel, 2013; Nodler and Segars, 2013)
No decrease (Nodler and Segars, 2013; Magalhaes et al., 2007)
41–93% (Cook et al., 2010; Esteve et al., 2012)
85% (Parker, 2007a, b)
60–65% (Olive et al., 2004; Nodler and Segars, 2013)
10–40% (Grigorieva et al., 2003; Parker, 2007a, b; Nodler and Segars, 2013)
Simple endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial changes, nausea, hot flashes, vomiting, fatigue
Asoprisnil 0.4–36% (Chwalisz et al., 2007; Wilkens et al., 2008)
Improved symptoms 67–89% (Chwalisz et al., 2007)
28–91% (Chwalisz et al., 2007; Wilkens et al., 2008) 16–70% (Chwalisz et al., 2007) Endometrial changes
Ulipristal acetate (CDB-2914) 12–42% (Donnez et al., 2012a, b)
21–36% (Levens et al., 2008)
90–98% (Donnez et al., 2012a, b)
81–90% (Levens et al., 2008)
73–82% (Donnez et al., 2012a, b) Possible endometrial Hyperplasia
Tranexamic acid No decrease up to 50% (Chwalisz and Winkel, 2013)
NSAIDs No decrease (Parker, 2007a, b)
Aromatase inhibitors
Letrozole
45.6–59.7% (Cook et al., 2010)
45.6% (Parsanezhad et al., 2010; Nodler and Segars, 2013)

aDepends on the dosage, time since treatment and number of fibroids.

Progesterone receptor agonists, SPRMs and aromatase inhibitors have been investigated, and targeting of progesterone receptors appears to be an attractive approach for symptomatic fibroid treatment (Chwalisz et al., 2005). Both SPRMS (e.g. J867; asoprisnil) and progesterone receptor agonists (e.g. mifepristone and ulipristal acetate) induce amenorrhea and reduced fibroid volume; however, they are associated with cystic changes of the endometrium of unknown clinical significance (Mutter et al., 2008; Spitz, 2009; Williams et al., 2012). Recently, letrozole and other aromatase inhibitors have been evaluated for their use as a possible monotherapy for uterine fibroids (Parsanezhad et al., 2010). Although they decrease fibroid volume, they have minimal effect on uterine bleeding, and may be associated with ovarian cyst formation.

As an alternative to surgery, an effective long-term medical treatment for uterine fibroids should reduce heavy uterine bleeding as well as fibroid/uterine volume without excessive side effects. This goal has not been achieved, and unfortunately, current treatments only reduce symptoms temporarily.

Uterine fibroid surgical therapy

RCTs and reviews from 2005 to 2010 were evaluated on the indications, options and complications of uterine fibroid surgical therapy. For women who want to maintain fertility, myomectomy remains the gold standard (see Tables IVIX). Data on myomectomies should include preoperative evaluation of the uterine cavity. The data suggest that surgical options should be individualized based on desires for future fertility, location and size of fibroids, and surgical risks. Further research on prevention of infection and post-operative adhesions is needed.

Table V.

Effect of procedure on symptoms for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.

MRgFUS, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound; UAE, uterine artery embolization; UFE; uterine fibroid embolization.

aDepends on the number of years since the procedure.

Table VI.

Complications by procedure for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.

Procedure Febrile morbiditya Blood lossb Rate of transfusion Post-operative adhesionsc
Hysterectomy 14% (Taran et al., 2010a, b) 265 ± 329 ml (Dickersin et al., 2007) 7–13% (Parker, 2007a, b; Taran et al., 2010a, b) NA
Abdominal hysterectomy 1–11% (LaMorte et al., 1993; Heitmann et al., 2013) 300–400 ml (LaMorte et al., 1993; Heitmann et al., 2013) 20% (LaMorte et al., 1993) NA
Myomectomy 12–33% (LaMorte et al., 1993; Iverson et al., 1999; Heitmann et al., 2013) 200–800 ml (Heitmann et al., 2013) 2–28% (Heitmann et al., 2013) Up to 90%d (Heitmann et al., 2013)
Abdominal myomectomy 2–5% (Heitmann et al., 2013) 296 ± 204 ml (Vercellini et al., 2003) 7–8% (Vercellini et al., 2003) 75–90% (Heitmann et al., 2013)
UAE/UFE 1% (Parker et al., 2007a, b) 0% (Parker, 2007a, b) 14% (Homer and Saridogan, 2010)
MRgFUS 0.03% (Taran et al., 2010a, b) 3% (Stewart et al., 2006; Al Hilli and Stewart, 2010; Taran et al., 2010a, b)

MRgFUS, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound; UAE, uterine artery embolization; UFE; uterine fibroid embolization.

aDefined as fever and/or infection.

bRate drops if GnRHa is used preoperatively.

cDepends on number of fibroids, or if interceed or sepafilm is used.

dMore common after posterior uterine incisions than after fundal or anterior uterine incisions.

Table VII.

Recurrence and reoperation rates by procedure for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.

MRgFUS, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound; UAE, uterine artery embolization; UFE; uterine fibroid embolization.

aDepends on the number of years since the procedure, age at procedure, whether childbearing was completed, number of fibroids and if GnRHa was used.

Table VIII.

Fertility after procedure for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.

MRgFUS, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound; UAE, uterine artery embolization; UFE; uterine fibroid embolization.

Table IX.

Obstetric outcomes after procedure for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.

MRgFUS, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound; UAE, uterine artery embolization; UFE; uterine fibroid embolization.

With technical advances, there has concurrently been an increase in minimally invasive procedures. Magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound using the ExAblate 2000® is the only device currently FDA approved to integrate real-time advanced imaging feedback into a treatment for leiomyoma, targeting and treating each fibroid individually (Tempany et al., 2003). Normal tissue injury is minimized, but some fibroids may not be treated. Volume reductions similar to that seen after uterine artery embolization (UAE) and GnRHa treatment were observed (see Tables IV and V). No RCTs on focused ultrasound surgery (FUS) have been published. However, the FIRSTT (Fibroid Interventions: Reducing Symptoms Today and Tomorrow) Study, a randomized trial comparing UAE and FUS in a racially diverse cohort, is underway. The FIRSTT Study will elucidate clinical outcomes and will include an assessment of economics and ovarian reserve (Bouwsma et al., 2011).

Another minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgery for fibroids is UAE, also referred to as uterine fibroid embolization (UFE). Current knowledge on UAE was summarized by describing the results of the Embolization versus Hysterectomy (EMMY) and the Randomized Study of Embolization and Surgical Treatment for Uterine Fibroids (REST) trials (see Tables VIX). The EMMY trial compared UAE to hysterectomy; symptoms significantly improved by similar magnitudes after both, but reinterventions were more common after UAE due to recurrent symptoms. The REST trial included patients who had undergone myomectomy, hysterectomy and embolization. It found similar symptomatic improvements after 5 years for all procedures, but re-intervention was again more frequent after UAE. Adverse events, such as uterine ischemic injury, were found to be infrequent. Fibroid expulsion after UAE is particularly concerning since it can require gynecological intervention, but has been found to be rare.

To date, no studies have established a rate of successful pregnancy after UAE. Recently, Homer and Saridogan (2010) found that rates of miscarriage, Cesarean section and post-partum hemorrhage were increased after UAE when compared with controls.

It was noted that gaps exist in our knowledge as it relates to certain aspects of the UAE technique not being adequately defined, such as missing an appropriate end-point, or determining whether the current technique used actually represents ‘over embolization’ with increased risk of potential injury to the endometrium, myometrium or ovary. Precipitating factors for complications are not well understood, and there is a need for more data on reproductive outcomes after UAE and myomectomy, such as whether one treatment might be preferable for certain subgroups.

Conclusions

While advances in research have expanded our knowledge of the pathobiology of fibroids, their etiology still remains incompletely understood. With technical advances, there has concurrently been an increase in minimally invasive surgical procedures; however, an effective long-term nonsurgical treatment for uterine fibroids to reduce heavy uterine bleeding as well as fibroid/uterine volume without excessive side effects has not been achieved. Further needs exist for determination of risk factors and initiation of preventive measures for fibroids, in addition to continued development of new medical and minimally invasive options for long-term treatment.

Future recommendations

During the Congress participants attended breakout sessions grouped under the broad topics of the meeting. The attendees were asked to address the future needs of their area of interest and to summarize the needs and future recommendations to present at the end of the meeting. What follows is a brief summary of each group based on the breakout session topics. The Epidemiology, genetics and the environment breakout group emphasized a need for increased public awareness of fibroids. This would assist in stimulating increased patient interest and possible participation of more patients in health-care activities and clinical studies, particularly in racial and ethnic communities. It was stressed that there is also a need to diversify study populations by increasing enrollment of Hispanic and Asian women, along with African American women. It was also recommended that in order to share information among the fibroid research and medical communities, development of a listserv of experts in the field would facilitate the rapid exchange of information. Creation of a standard tool kit for research that contains a list of resources for investigators that outlines relevant end-points and important data to collect when initiating uterine fibroid research would also be helpful. Due to the increase role of the environment as a trigger for many disease processes, environmental exposures and life-exposure research that incorporates collecting data on potential endocrine disruptors and behavioral factors (diet, physical activity, etc.), and takes into account total (life) exposures, and their association with development of uterine fibroids should be considered. This group also suggested more genetic studies that can integrate full depth genome sequencing of uterine fibroids and involve epigenetic approaches to begin classifying mutations and nongenomic changes, respectively, in fibroids. The Pathogenesis: growth factor, cytokine, extracellular matrix and cell signaling research breakout group suggested systematic protein profiling studies of uterine leiomyomas at the tissue and cell culture levels that would increase our knowledge of protein expression as it relates to different tumor phenotypes that might be regulated by post-translational modifications, in addition to the exploration of the proteomics of fibroids. There was a consensus among attendees that it is necessary to optimize cell culture systems and animal models for measuring growth factors and cytokines, including cultures of primary and immortalized uterine leiomyoma and uterine smooth muscle cells. Unification of reporting conditions of samples or patients as it relates to age, tumor size, hormone status, tumor location and ethnicity was encouraged. There should be additional research on the extracellular matrix that takes into account organization and regulation, cell- matrix and cell–cell interactions. Emphasis was placed on the need for further studies on regulation and identification of key transcription factors and their role in uterine leiomyoma growth. Research focusing on the microenvironment of leiomyomas as it relates to the interactions of cell populations (tumor cells, SP stem cells, fibroblasts, vasculature) and how uterine fibroid cells survive and perhaps thrive in their surroundings was suggested. This group also recommended the expansion of the NICHD uterine fibroid tissue/cell bank to increase diversity, histological types and tissue microarrays. The Hormonal regulation and hormone receptor interactions research breakout group proposed a further need to explore the complex relationship of estradiol and progesterone in uterine fibroid growth and pregnancy. Additional studies to assess the effects of pregnancy on uterine fibroid growth and biological behavior were recommended. Further evaluation of the side effects of SPRMs to characterize how different regimens modify the histologic response of the endometrium, and the efficacy of IUD use with a progestin as treatment for uterine fibroids was discussed. Research on new molecular targets as therapeutic agents for uterine fibroids and examination of new retinoid compounds as therapy for uterine fibroids, focusing on potential side effects were recommended. In the Developing new model systems for studying fibroids breakout group, attendees proposed that reliable uterine fibroid-based animal models with desired features that replicate human disease be developed and used independently to study uterine fibroid biology and to test new therapeutic agents. They suggested that desired features of an animal model for fibroids should include: initiate spontaneous growth of uterine fibroids, express estrogen and progesterone receptors, create extra cellular matrix, have a normal karyotype, be immune competent, develop tumors in the appropriate anatomical location, and retain the benign status of the tumor. This group also recommended organizing a network or registry to share animal models among investigators and placing greater emphasis on projects that involve in vivo studies for evaluating new therapeutic agents with a focus on exploring potential side effects on fertility, liver function, normal myometrium and other biological and physiological parameters. The Advances in clinical and translational research breakout group suggested the development of a National Uterine Fibroid Research Network that would be similar to other large-scale research networks to facilitate multisite collaborations, conduct clinical trials that reflect community practice and incorporate uterine fibroid translational research. Phenotype standardization was also suggested, as part of a large-scale national phenotyping effort, that would enhance the ability to distinguish differences based on well-delineated patients, focusing on consensus and standardized measures. The need to develop a nationwide data registry that could be linked to electronic medical records and web-based methods that would allow for tracking of large-national cohorts, in addition to tissue and specimen banks to support the inclusion of well-characterized patients was echoed by this group. The Clinical management and therapeutics options workgroup proposed the creation of a database with uniform data-reporting instruments to facilitate decision-making pertaining to current and new surgical and medical technologies. Development of basic tools for uterine fibroid classification and standardizing outcome measures was also suggested. Additionally, evaluating existing databases (e.g. HMOs) to obtain comparative information on current treatment outcomes would move the field forward. Prospective comparative trials should be conducted to evaluate outcomes and determine the best treatment options for patients, and patient education tools that are interactive to assist with decision-making and serve as a resource should be made readily available to patients. The Proposed new fibroid classification system breakout group proposed the inclusion of a drawing of the uterus and fibroids to indicate clinical severity, location or stage of the disease in the current classification scheme. To ensure clinical relevance of the classification scheme they suggested that it should incorporate the burden of uterine fibroid disease by including bleeding, blood loss and pain. The new classification system should be compared with earlier versions and tested for reliability and reproducibility.

Charting the course: summary of breakout workgroup recommendations

In summary, the meeting met the overarching goals of the conference to bring together multidisciplinary aspects of uterine fibroid research with an eye toward identifying pivotal questions and formulating new collaborations with a focus on exploring the development of research innovations important to prevention of the disease and to optimizing clinical management. The conference provided a forum for experts in the field to concentrate on promising and innovative research that continues to build upon and enhance our understanding of the basic underpinnings of uterine leiomyoma pathophysiology and innovative targets for treatment modalities. Also, the importance of environmental exposures in early life and later expression of disease were addressed in addition to the roles of genetic, environmental and epigenetic events in influencing disease manifestation. New research should shape and expand our basic understanding of uterine leiomyoma pathophysiology and innovative treatment modalities. Although the existing data are impressive, many challenges remain and further research is absolutely warranted. The final session served as a catalyst for discussing future research recommendations, directions and opportunities formalized by speakers and meeting participates in seven breakout workgroups.

Authors' roles

J.H.S., E.C.P., J.N., V.W.P., L.S.B., D.D.: planned, organized and executed the Third NIH International Congress on Advances in Uterine Leiomyoma Research from which much of the data in the manuscript was taken. J.H.S., E.C.P., J.N, X.C.G., X.G., D.D.: compiled written data, wrote draft manuscript, constructed tables for comprehensive review and made manuscript revisions. J.H.S., E.C.P., J.N., L.S.B., V.W.P., D.D.: conception and design, manuscript editing, critical discussion and manuscript revision and approval.

Funding

The Congress was supported, in part, by the Intramural Research Program of the NIEHS and NTP, NIH; the Office of Research on Women's Health, NIH and the Reproductive Sciences Branch and the Intramural Research Program in Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology, NICHD, NIH.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

Ayman Al-Hendy, M.D., Ph.D., Meharry Medical College; Alicia Y. Armstrong, M.D., M.H.S.C.R., Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH; Donna Baird, Ph.D., National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH; Linda S. Birnbaum, Ph.D., D.A.B.T., A.T.S., National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, National Toxicology Program; Michael S. Broder, M.D., M.S.H.S., PHAR, LLC, California; Germaine Buck Louis, Ph.D., M.S., Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH; Serdar Bulun, M.D., Northwestern University; William Catherino, M.D., Ph.D., Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Uniform Services University of the Health Sciences; Vargheese M. Chennathukuzhi, Ph.D., University of Kansas Medical Center; Nasser Chegini, Ph.D., University of Florida; Gregory Christman, M.D., University of Michigan; Kristof Chwalisz, M.D., Ph.D., Abbott Laboratories, Illinois; PonJola Coney, M.D., Virginia Commonwealth University; Aimee A. D'Aloisio, B.A., National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH; Joan Davis Nagel, M.D., M.P.H., Office of Research on Women's Health, NIH; Alan DeCherney, M.D., Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH; Darlene Dixon, D.V.M., Ph.D., National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, National Toxicology Program; David I. Eisenstein, M.D., Henry Ford Hospital; Katherine Hartmann, M.D., Ph.D., Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Florence Haseltine, Ph.D., M.D., Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH; Nancy H. Ing, D.V.M., Ph.D., Texas A&M University; Alison Jacoby, M.D., University of California, San Francisco; Takeshi Kurita, Ph.D., Northwestern University; Phyllis Leppert, Ph.D., M.D., Duke University; M Locastro, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Minnie Malik, Ph.D., Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Uniform Services University of the Health Sciences; Erica E. Marsh, M.D., M.Sc., Northwestern University; Takeshi Maruo, M.D., Ph.D., Kobe Children's Hospital, Japan; Cynthia Morton, Ph.D., Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Evan R. Myers, M.D., M.P.H., Duke University; Romana A. Nowak, Ph.D., University of Illinois; Bogdan Nowicki, M.D., Meharry Medical College; Estella C. Parrott, M.D., M.P.H., Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH; Vivian W. Pinn, M.D., Office of Research on Women's Health, NIH; Colin Pollard, Food and Drug Administration; James Segars, M.D., Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH; Catherine Sewell, M.D., M.P.H., Johns Hopkins University; James B. Spies, M.D., M.P.H., Georgetown University; Andreas Steinmeyer, Ph.D., Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Germany; Elizabeth Stewart, M.D., Mayo Clinic; Darlene K. Taylor, Ph.D., North Carolina Central University; Jose Teixeira, Ph.D., Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Cheryl Walker, Ph.D., University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; Jean Y.J. Wang, Ph.D., University of California, San Diego; Jian-Jun Wei, M.D., Northwestern University; Lauren A. Wise, M.S., Sc.D., Boston University.

References

  1. Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau St, Ransom SB. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:698–705. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahn WS, Kim KW, Bae SM, Yoon JH, Lee JM, Namkoong SE, Kim JH, Kim CK, Lee YJ, Kim YW. Targeted cellular process profiling approach for uterine leiomyoma using cDNA microarray, proteomics and gene ontology analysis. Int J Exp Pathol. 2003;84:267–279. doi: 10.1111/j.0959-9673.2003.00362.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Hendy A, Salama SA. Catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism is associated with increased uterine leiomyoma risk in different ethnic groups. J Soc Gynecol Invest. 2006;13:136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jsgi.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Al Hilli MM, Stewart EA. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Semin Reproduct Med. 2010;28:242–249. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1251481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson J, Barbieri RL. Abnormal gene expression in uterine leiomyomas. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 1995;2:663–672. doi: 10.1016/1071-5576(95)00021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baird DD, Newbold R. Prenatal diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure is associated with uterine leiomyoma development. Reprod Toxicol. 2005;20:81–84. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2005.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:100–107. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bajekal N, Li TC. Fibroids, infertility and pregnancy wastage. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6:614–620. doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.6.614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bakas P, Liapis A, Vlahopoulos S, Giner M, Logotheti S, Creatsas G, Meligova AK, Alexis MN, Zoumpourlis V. Estrogen receptor alpha and beta in uterine fibroids: a basis for altered estrogen responsiveness. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1878–1885. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bedient CE, Magrina JF, Noble BN, Kho RM. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(566):e561–565. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ben-Sasson H, Ben-Meir A, Shushan A, Karra L, Rojansky N, Klein BY, Levitzki R, Ben-Bassat H. All-trans-retinoic acid mediates changes in PI3K and retinoic acid signaling proteins of leiomyomas. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2080–2086. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Borgfeldt C, Andolf E. Transvaginal ultrasonographic findings in the uterus and the endometrium: low prevalence of leiomyoma in a random sample of women age 25–40 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:202–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bouwsma EV, Hesley GK, Woodrum DA, Weaver AL, Leppert PC, Peterson LG, Stewart EA. Comparing focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization for uterine fibroids-rationale and design of the Fibroid Interventions: reducing symptoms today and tomorrow (FIRSTT) trial. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:704–710. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bower JK, Schreiner PJ, Sternfeld B, Lewis CE. Black-White differences in hysterectomy prevalence: the CARDIA study. Am J Public health. 2009;99:300–307. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.133702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bredfeldt TG, Greathouse KL, Safe SH, Hung MC, Bedford MT, Walker CL. Xenoestrogen-induced regulation of EZH2 and histone methylation via estrogen receptor signaling to PI3K/AKT. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24:993–1006. doi: 10.1210/me.2009-0438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brill AI. Treatment of fibroids via uterine artery occlusion (uterine artery embolization and Doppler-guided uterine artery occlusion): potential role in today's armamentarium. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280:513–520. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-0952-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Britten JL, Malik M, Levy G, Mendoza M, Catherino WH. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist leuprolide acetate and GnRH antagonist cetrorelix acetate directly inhibit leiomyoma extracellular matrix production. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1299–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Buck Louis GM, Sundaram R. Exposome: time for transformative research. Stat Med. 2012;31:2569–2575. doi: 10.1002/sim.5496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bulletti C, De Ziegler D, Polli V, Flamigni C. The role of leiomyomas in infertility. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999;6:441–445. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(99)80008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bulletti C, DE Ziegler D, Levi Setti P, Cicinelli E, Polli V, Stefanetti M. Myomas, pregnancy outcome, and in vitro fertilization. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1034:84–92. doi: 10.1196/annals.1335.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bulun SE, Imir G, Utsunomiya H, Thung S, Gurates B, Tamura M, Lin Z. Aromatase in endometriosis and uterine leiomyomata. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;95:57–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Busnelli M, Rimoldi V, Vigano P, Persani L, Di Blasio AM, Chini B. Oxytocin-induced cell growth proliferation in human myometrial cells and leiomyomas. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1869–1874. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cardozo ER, Clark AD, Banks NK, Henne MB, Stegmann BJ, Segars JH. The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:211 e211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Carney SA, Tahara H, Swartz CD, Risinger JI, He H, Moore AB, Haseman JK, Barrett JC, Dixon D. Immortalization of human uterine leiomyoma and myometrial cell lines after induction of telomerase activity: molecular and phenotypic characteristics. Lab Invest. 2002;82:719–728. doi: 10.1097/01.lab.0000017499.51216.3e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Carpenter TT, Walker WJ. Pregnancy following uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: a series of 26 completed pregnancies. BJOG. 2005;112:321–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Casini ML, Rossi F, Agostini R, Unfer V. Effects of the position of fibroids on fertility. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006;22:106–109. doi: 10.1080/09513590600604673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Catherino WH, Leppert PC, Stenmark MH, Payson M, Potlog-Nahari C, Nieman LK, Segars JH. Reduced dermatopontin expression is a molecular link between uterine leiomyomas and keloids. Genes Chromosome Cancer. 2004;40:204–217. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Catherino WH, Malik M, Driggers P, Chappel S, Segars J, Davis J. Novel, orally active selective progesterone receptor modulator CP8947 inhibits leiomyoma cell proliferation without adversely affecting endometrium or myometrium. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;122:279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Catherino WH, Parrott E, Segars J. Proceedings from theNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development conference on the Uterine Fibroid Research Update Workshop. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:9–12. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.08.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cesen-Cummings K, Copland JA, Barrett JC, Walker CL, Davis BJ. Pregnancy, parturition, and prostaglandins: defining uterine leiomyomas. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(Suppl. 5):817–820. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s5817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cesen-Cummings K, Houston KD, Copland JA, Moorman VJ, Walker CL, Davis BJ. Uterine leiomyomas express myometrial contractile-associated proteins involved in pregnancy-related hormone signaling. J Soc Gynecol Invest. 2003;10:11–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chahine E, Catherino WH. Minimally iInvasive treatment options for uterine fibroids. In: Segars J, editor. Fibroids. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013. pp. 95–108. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chang B, Myatt L, Cui XL. Loss of proliferative capacity in a retroviral immortalized human uterine smooth muscle cell line derived from leiomyoma is restored by hTERT overexpression. Reprod Sci. 2009;16:1062–1071. doi: 10.1177/1933719109344773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chang HL, Senaratne TN, Zhang L, Szotek PP, Stewart E, Dombkowski D, Preffer F, Donahoe PK, Teixeira J. Uterine leiomyomas exhibit fewer stem/progenitor cell characteristics when compared with corresponding normal myometrium. Reprod Sci. 2010;17:158–167. doi: 10.1177/1933719109348924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Chegini N. Proinflammatory and profibrotic mediators: principal effectors of leiomyoma development as a fibrotic disorder. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28:180–203. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1251476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Chuang TD, Luo X, Panda H, Chegini N. miR-93/106b and their host gene, MCM7, are differentially expressed in leiomyomas and functionally target F3 and IL-8. Mol Endocrinol. 2012a;26:1028–1042. doi: 10.1210/me.2012-1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Chuang TD, Panda H, Luo X, Chegini N. miR-200c is aberrantly expressed in leiomyomas in an ethnic-dependent manner and targets ZEBs, VEGFA, TIMP2, and FBLN5. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2012b;19:541–556. doi: 10.1530/ERC-12-0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Chwalisz K, Winkel C. Medical management of women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. In: Segars J, editor. Fibroids, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013. pp. 61–75. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chwalisz K, Perez MC, Demanno D, Winkel C, Schubert G, Elger W. Selective progesterone receptor modulator development and use in the treatment of leiomyomata and endometriosis. Endocrine reviews. 2005;26:423–438. doi: 10.1210/er.2005-0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Chwalisz K, Larsen L, Mattia-Goldberg C, Edmonds A, Elger W, Winkel CA. A randomized, controlled trial of asoprisnil, a novel selective progesterone receptor modulator, in women with uterine leiomyomata. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:1399–1412. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ciarmela P, Islam MS, Reis FM, Gray PC, Bloise E, Petraglia F, Vale W, Castellucci M. Growth factors and myometrium: biological effects in uterine fibroid and possible clinical implications. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:772–790. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Cook JD, Walker CL. Treatment strategies for uterine leiomyoma: the role of hormonal modulation. Semin Reprod Med. 2004;22:105–111. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cook JD, Davis BJ, Cai SL, Barrett JC, Conti CJ, Walker CL. Interaction between genetic susceptibility and early-life environmental exposure determines tumor-suppressor-gene penetrance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:8644–8649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503218102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Cook H, Ezzati M, Segars JH, McCarthy K. The impact of uterine leiomyomas on reproductive outcomes. Minerva Ginecol. 2010;62:225–236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Coutinho EM, Goncalves MT. Long-term treatment of leiomyomas with gestrinone. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:939–946. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60722-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Crabtree JS, Jelinsky SA, Harris HA, Choe SE, Cotreau MM, Kimberland ML, Wilson E, Saraf KA, Liu W, McCampbell AS, et al. Comparison of human and rat uterine leiomyomata: identification of a dysregulated mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6171–6178. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Cramer SF, Patel A. The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 1990;94:435–438. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/94.4.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. D'Aloisio AA, Baird DD, DeRoo LA, Sandler DP. Association of intrauterine and early-life exposures with diagnosis of uterine leiomyomata by 35 years of age in the Sister Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:375–381. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. D'Aloisio AA, Baird DD, DeRoo LA, Sandler DP. Early-life exposures and early-onset uterine leiomyomata in black women in the Sister Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:406–412. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Danielson LS, Menendez S, Attolini CS, Guijarro MV, Bisogna M, Wei J, Socci ND, Levine DA, Michor F, Hernando E. A differentiation-based microRNA signature identifies leiomyosarcoma as a mesenchymal stem cell-related malignancy. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:908–917. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Deng L, Wu T, Chen XY, Xie L, Yang J. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) for uterine leiomyomas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD005287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005287.pub4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Dhingra S, Rodriguez ME, Shen Q, Duan X, Stanton ML, Chen L, Zhang R, Brown RE. Constitutive activation with overexpression of the mTORC2-phospholipase D1 pathway in uterine leiomyosarcoma and STUMP: morphoproteomic analysis with therapeutic implications. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011;4:134–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Di X, Yu L, Moore AB, Castro L, Zheng X, Hermon T, Dixon D. A low concentration of genistein induces estrogen receptor-alpha and insulin-like growth factor-I receptor interactions and proliferation in uterine leiomyoma cells. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1873–1883. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Di X, Andrews DM, Tucker CJ, Yu L, Moore AB, Zheng X, Castro L, Hermon T, Xiao H, Dixon D. A high concentration of genistein down-regulates activin A, Smad3 and other TGF-beta pathway genes in human uterine leiomyoma cells. Exp Mol Med. 2012;44:281–292. doi: 10.3858/emm.2012.44.4.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Dickersin K, Munro MG, Clark M, Langenberg P, Scherer R, Frick K, Zhu Q, Hallock L, Nichols J, Yalcinkaya TM. Hysterectomy compared with endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1279–1289. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000292083.97478.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ding L, Xu J, Luo X, Chegini N. Gonadotropin releasing hormone and transforming growth factor beta activate mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellularly regulated kinase and differentially regulate fibronectin, type I collagen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in leiomyoma and myometrial smooth muscle cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:5549–5555. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Dixon D, Parrott EC, Segars JH, Olden K, Pinn VW. The second National Institutes of Health International Congress on advances in uterine leiomyoma research: conference summary and future recommendations. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:800–806. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Donnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P, Puscasiu L, Zakharenko NF, Ivanova T, Ugocsai G, Mara M, Jilla MP, Bestel E, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus placebo for fibroid treatment before surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012a;366:409–420. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vazquez F, Bouchard P, Lemieszczuk B, Baro F, Nouri K, Selvaggi L, Sodowski K, Bestel E, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2012b;366:421–432. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Englund K, Blanck A, Gustavsson I, Lundkvist U, Sjoblom P, Norgren A, Lindblom B. Sex steroid receptors in human myometrium and fibroids: changes during the menstrual cycle and gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:4092–4096. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.11.5287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Engman M, Granberg S, Williams AR, Meng CX, Lalitkumar PG, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Mifepristone for treatment of uterine leiomyoma. A prospective randomized placebo controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1870–1879. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Eskenazi B, Warner M, Samuels S, Young J, Gerthoux PM, Needham L, Patterson D, Olive D, Gavoni N, Vercellini P, et al. Serum dioxin concentrations and risk of uterine leiomyoma in the Seveso Women's Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:79–87. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Esteve JL, Acosta R, Perez Y, Campos R, Hernandez AV, Texido CS. Treatment of uterine myoma with 5 or 10 mg mifepristone daily during 6 months, post-treatment evolution over 12 months: double-blind randomised clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;161:202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Everitt JI, Wolf DC, Howe SR, Goldsworthy TL, Walker C. Rodent model of reproductive tract leiomyomata. Clinical and pathological features. Am J Pathol. 1995;146:1556–1567. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ezzati M, Norian JM, Segars JH. Management of uterine fibroids in the patient pursuing assisted reproductive technologies. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2009;5:413–421. doi: 10.2217/whe.09.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Fenlon E, Spies JB. Nonsurgical option for fibroid treatment: uterine fibroid embolization. In: Segars J, editor. Fibroids. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013. pp. 76–84. [Google Scholar]
  67. Field KJ, Griffith JW, Lang CM. Spontaneous reproductive tract leiomyomas in aged guinea-pigs. J Comp Pathol. 1989;101:287–294. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(89)90038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Fitzgerald JB, Chennathukuzhi V, Koohestani F, Nowak RA, Christenson LK. Role of microRNA-21 and programmed cell death 4 in the pathogenesis of human uterine leiomyomas. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:726–734. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.040. e722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Flake GP, Andersen J, Dixon D. Etiology and pathogenesis of uterine leiomyomas: a review. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1037–1054. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Freed MM, Spies JB. Uterine artery embolization for fibroids: a review of current outcomes. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28:235–241. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1251480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Friedman AJ, Harrison-Atlas D, Barbieri RL, Benacerraf B, Gleason R, Schiff I. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluating the efficacy of leuprolide acetate depot in the treatment of uterine leiomyomata. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:251–256. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60486-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Fuchs-Young R, Howe S, Hale L, Miles R, Walker C. Inhibition of estrogen-stimulated growth of uterine leiomyomas by selective estrogen receptor modulators. Mol Carcinog. 1996;17:151–159. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2744(199611)17:3<151::AID-MC7>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Gao X, Yu L, Castro L, Moore AB, Hermon T, Bortner C, Sifre M, Dixon D. An endocrine-disrupting chemical, fenvalerate, induces cell cycle progression and collagen type I expression in human uterine leiomyoma and myometrial cells. Toxicol Lett. 2010;196:133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Gao X, Yu L, Castro L, Tucker CJ, Moore AB, Xiao H, Dixon D. An essential role of p27 downregulation in fenvalerate-induced cell growth in human uterine leiomyoma and smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;303:E1025–E1035. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00107.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Gentry CC, Okolo SO, Fong LF, Crow JC, Maclean AB, Perrett CW. Quantification of vascular endothelial growth factor-A in leiomyomas and adjacent myometrium. Clin Sci (Lond) 2001;101:691–695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Gilden M, Malik M, Britten J, Delgado T, Levy G, Catherino WH. Leiomyoma fibrosis inhibited by liarozole, a retinoic acid metabolic blocking agent. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1557–1562. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Glace L, Grygielko ET, Boyle R, Wang Q, Laping NJ, Sulpizio AC, Bray JD. Estrogen-induced stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1/Cxcl12) expression is repressed by progesterone and by selective estrogen receptor modulators via estrogen receptor alpha in rat uterine cells and tissues. Steroids. 2009;74:1015–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2009.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Goldberg J, Pereira L. Pregnancy outcomes following treatment for fibroids: uterine fibroid embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18:402–406. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000233934.13684.cb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Goodwin SC, Spies JB, Worthington-Kirsch R, Peterson E, Pron G, Li S, Myers ER. Uterine artery embolization for treatment of leiomyomata: long-term outcomes from the FIBROID Registry. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:22–33. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000296526.71749.c9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Greathouse KL, Cook JD, Lin K, Davis BJ, Berry TD, Bredfeldt TG, Walker CL. Identification of uterine leiomyoma genes developmentally reprogrammed by neonatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol. Reprod Sci. 2008;15:765–778. doi: 10.1177/1933719108322440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Greathouse KL, Bredfeldt T, Everitt JI, Lin K, Berry T, Kannan K, Mittelstadt ML, Ho SM, Walker CL. Environmental estrogens differentially engage the histone methyltransferase EZH2 to increase risk of uterine tumorigenesis. Mol Cancer Res. 2012;10:546–557. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Grigorieva V, Chen-Mok M, Tarasova M, Mikhailov A. Use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system to treat bleeding related to uterine leiomyomas. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1194–1198. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00175-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Grings AO, Lora V, Ferreira GD, Brum IS, Corleta H, Capp E. Protein expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta and aromatase in myometrium and uterine leiomyoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;73:113–117. doi: 10.1159/000330700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Grudzien MM, Low PS, Manning PC, Arredondo M, Belton RJ, Jr, Nowak RA. The antifibrotic drug halofuginone inhibits proliferation and collagen production by human leiomyoma and myometrial smooth muscle cells. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1290–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Gurates B, Parmaksiz C, Kilic G, Celik H, Kumru S, Simsek M. Treatment of symptomatic uterine leiomyoma with letrozole. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:569–574. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60246-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Hald K, Noreng HJ, Istre O, Klow NE. Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic occlusion of uterine arteries for leiomyomas: long-term results of a randomized comparative trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:1303–1310. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.07.022. quiz 1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Halder SK, Goodwin JS, Al-Hendy A. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 reduces TGF-beta3-induced fibrosis-related gene expression in human uterine leiomyoma cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:E754–E762. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Halder SK, Sharan C, Al-Hendy A. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 treatment shrinks uterine leiomyoma tumors in the Eker rat model. Biol Reprod. 2012;86:116. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.111.098145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Halder SK, Osteen KG, Al-Hendy A. Vitamin D3 inhibits expression and activities of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in human uterine fibroid cells. Hum Reprod. 2013a;28:2407–2416. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Halder SK, Osteen KG, Al-Hendy A. 1,25–dihydroxyvitamin D3 reduces extracellular matrix-associated protein expression in human uterine fibroid cells. Biol Reprod. 2013b doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.107714. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Hart R, Khalaf Y, Yeong CT, Seed P, Taylor A, Braude P. A prospective controlled study of the effect of intramural uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted conception. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2411–2417. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Hassan MH, Eyzaguirre E, Arafa HM, Hamada FM, Salama SA, Al-Hendy A. Memy I: a novel murine model for uterine leiomyoma using adenovirus-enhanced human fibroid explants in severe combined immune deficiency mice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:156 e151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Hassan MH, Othman EE, Hornung D, Al-Hendy A. Gene therapy of benign gynecological diseases. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61:822–835. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Hassan MH, Fouad H, Bahashwan S, Al-Hendy A. Towards non-surgical therapy for uterine fibroids: catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitor shrinks uterine fibroid lesions in the Eker rat model. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:3008–3018. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Heitmann RJ, Duke CMP, Catherino WH, Armstrong AY. Surgical treatments and outcomes. In: Segars J, editor. Fibroids, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013. pp. 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  96. Helmke BM, Markowski DN, Muller MH, Sommer A, Muller J, Moller C, Bullerdiek J. HMGA proteins regulate the expression of FGF2 in uterine fibroids. Mol Hum Reprod. 2011;17:135–142. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaq083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Hermon TL, Moore AB, Yu L, Kissling GE, Castora FJ, Dixon D. Estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) phospho-serine-118 is highly expressed in human uterine leiomyomas compared to matched myometrium. Virchows Arch. 2008;453:557–569. doi: 10.1007/s00428-008-0679-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Hirst A, Dutton S, Wu O, Briggs A, Edwards C, Waldenmaier L, Maresh M, Nicholson A, McPherson K. A multi-centre retrospective cohort study comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The HOPEFUL study. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12:1–248. doi: 10.3310/hta12050. iii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Hodge JC, Kim TM, Dreyfuss JM, Somasundaram P, Christacos NC, Rousselle M, Quade BJ, Park PJ, Stewart EA, Morton CC. Expression profiling of uterine leiomyomata cytogenetic subgroups reveals distinct signatures in matched myometrium: transcriptional profilingof the t(12;14) and evidence in support of predisposing genetic heterogeneity. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:2312–2329. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Hodges LC, Houston KD, Hunter DS, Fuchs-Young R, Zhang Z, Wineker RC, Walker CL. Transdominant suppression of estrogen receptor signaling by progesterone receptor ligands in uterine leiomyoma cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002;196:11–20. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(02)00230-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Hoekstra AV, Sefton EC, Berry E, Lu Z, Hardt J, Marsh E, Yin P, Clardy J, Chakravarti D, Bulun S, et al. Progestins activate the AKT pathway in leiomyoma cells and promote survival. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1768–1774. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Homer H, Saridogan E. Uterine artery embolization for fibroids is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:324–330. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Howe SR, Gottardis MM, Everitt JI, Goldsworthy TL, Wolf DC, Walker C. Rodent model of reproductive tract leiomyomata. Establishment and characterization of tumor-derived cell lines. Am J Pathol. 1995;146:1568–1579. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Huang PC, Tsai EM, Li WF, Liao PC, Chung MC, Wang YH, Wang SL. Association between phthalate exposure and glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphism in adenomyosis, leiomyoma and endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:986–994. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Hummel CW, Geiser AG, Bryant HU, Cohen IR, Dally RD, Fong KC, Frank SA, Hinklin R, Jones SA, Lewis G, et al. A selective estrogen receptor modulator designed for the treatment of uterine leiomyoma with unique tissue specificity for uterus and ovaries in rats. J Med Chem. 2005;48:6772–6775. doi: 10.1021/jm050723z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Hunter DS, Hodges LC, Vonier PM, Fuchs-Young R, Gottardis MM, Walker CL. Estrogen receptor activation via activation function 2 predicts agonism of xenoestrogens in normal and neoplastic cells of the uterine myometrium. Cancer Res. 1999;59:3090–3099. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Ilha MR, Newman SJ, van Amstel S, Fecteau KA, Rohrbach BW. Uterine lesions in 32 female miniature pet pigs. Vet Pathol. 2010;47:1071–1075. doi: 10.1177/0300985810382522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Ioffe OB, Zaino RJ, Mutter GL. Endometrial changes from short-term therapy with CDB-4124, a selective progesterone receptor modulator. Mod Pathol. 2009;22:450–459. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Ishikawa H, Reierstad S, Demura M, Rademaker AW, Kasai T, Inoue M, Usui H, Shozu M, Bulun SE. High aromatase expression in uterine leiomyoma tissues of African-American women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1752–1756. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Ishikawa H, Ishi K, Serna VA, Kakazu R, Bulun SE, Kurita T. Progesterone is essential for maintenance and growth of uterine leiomyoma. Endocrinology. 2010;151:2433–2442. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Islam MS, Protic O, Giannubilo SR, Toti P, Tranquilli AL, Petraglia F, Castellucci M, Ciarmela P. Uterine leiomyoma: available medical treatments and new possible therapeutic options. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:921–934. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Iverson RE, Jr, Chelmow D, Strohbehn K, Waldman L, Evantash EG, Aronson MP. Myomectomy fever: testing the dogma. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:104–108. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00156-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Je EM, Kim MR, Min KO, Yoo NJ, Lee SH. Mutational analysis of MED12 exon 2 in uterine leiomyoma and other common tumors. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:E1044–E1047. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Jiang Y, Suo G, Sadarangani A, Cowan B, Wang JY. Expression profiling of protein tyrosine kinases and their ligand activators in leiomyoma uteri. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2010;56:318–326. doi: 10.3109/19396361003646109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Johnson NL, Norwitz E, Segars JH. Management of fibroids in pregnancy. In: Segars J, editor. Fibroids. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013. pp. 36–53. [Google Scholar]
  116. Joseph DS, Malik M, Nurudeen S, Catherino WH. Myometrial cells undergo fibrotic transformation under the influence of transforming growth factor beta-3. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1500–1508. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Kim JJ, Sefton EC. The role of progesterone signaling in the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;358:223–231. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.05.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Kim JJ, Sefton EC, Bulun SE. Progesterone receptor action in leiomyoma and endometrial cancer. Progr Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2009;87:53–85. doi: 10.1016/S1877-1173(09)87002-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Kjerulff KH, Langenberg P, Seidman JD, Stolley PD, Guzinski GM. Uterine leiomyomas. Racial differences in severity, symptoms and age at diagnosis. J Reprod Med. 1996;41:483–490. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Kurachi O, Matsuo H, Samoto T, Maruo T. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression in human uterine leiomyoma and its down-regulation by progesterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:2275–2280. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.5.7469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. LaMorte AI, Lalwani S, Diamond MP. Morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:897–900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Landi S, Fiaccavento A, Zaccoletti R, Barbieri F, Syed R, Minelli L. Pregnancy outcomes and deliveries after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:177–181. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60295-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Landon MB, Lynch CD. Optimal timing and mode of delivery after cesarean with previous classical incision or myomectomy: a review of the data. Semin Perinatol. 2011;35:257–261. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Laping NJ, Everitt JI, Frazier KS, Burgert M, Portis MJ, Cadacio C, Gold LI, Walker CL. Tumor-specific efficacy of transforming growth factor-beta RI inhibition in Eker rats. Clinical Cancer Res : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2007;13:3087–3099. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Laughlin SK, Baird DD, Savitz DA, Herring AH, Hartmann KE. Prevalence of uterine leiomyomas in the first trimester of pregnancy: an ultrasound-screening study. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:630–635. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318197bbaf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Laughlin SK, Schroeder JC, Baird DD. New directions in the epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28:204–217. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1251477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Lee BS, Nowak RA. Human leiomyoma smooth muscle cells show increased expression of transforming growth factor-beta 3 (TGF beta 3) and altered responses to the antiproliferative effects of TGF beta. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:913–920. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.2.7237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Leppert PC, Baginski T, Prupas C, Catherino WH, Pletcher S, Segars JH. Comparative ultrastructure of collagen fibrils in uterine leiomyomas and normal myometrium. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(Suppl. 3):1182–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Levens E, Luo X, Ding L, Williams RS, Chegini N. Fibromodulin is expressed in leiomyoma and myometrium and regulated by gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue therapy and TGF-beta through Smad and MAPK-mediated signalling. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005;11:489–494. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Levens ED, Potlog-Nahari C, Armstrong AY, Wesley R, Premkumar A, Blithe DL, Blocker W, Nieman LK. CDB-2914 for uterine leiomyomata treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1129–1136. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181705d0e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Lewicka A, Osuch B, Cendrowski K, Zegarska J, Stelmachów J. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA in human leiomyomas. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010;26:451–455. doi: 10.3109/09513591003632159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Li B, Takeda T, Tsuiji K, Kondo A, Kitamura M, Wong TF, Yaegashi N. The antidiabetic drug metformin inhibits uterine leiomyoma cell proliferation via an AMP-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:87–90. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2012.706668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Li D, Zhang Y, Han H, Geng J, Xie X, Zheng J, Wang Y, Zou X. Effect of lichong decoction on expression of IGF-I and proliferating cell nuclear antigen mRNA in rat model of uterine leiomyoma. J Tradit Chin Med. 2012;32:636–640. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(13)60084-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Liang M, Wang H, Zhang Y, Lu S, Wang Z. Expression and functional analysis of platelet-derived growth factor in uterine leiomyomata. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006;5:28–33. doi: 10.4161/cbt.5.1.2234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Liu JP, Yang H, Xia Y, Cardini F. Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:CD005292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005292.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Lukes AS, Moore KA, Muse KN, Gersten JK, Hecht BR, Edlund M, Richter HE, Eder SE, Attia GR, Patrick DL, et al. Tranexamic acid treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:865–875. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f20177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Luo X, Chegini N. The expression and potential regulatory function of microRNAs in the pathogenesis of leiomyoma. Semin Reprod Med. 2008;26:500–514. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1096130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Luo X, Ding L, Xu J, Chegini N. Gene expression profiling of leiomyoma and myometrial smooth muscle cells in response to transforming growth factor-beta. Endocrinology. 2005;146:1097–1118. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Luo X, Pan Q, Liu L, Chegini N. Genomic and proteomic profiling II: comparative assessment of gene expression profiles in leiomyomas, keloids, and surgically-induced scars. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2007;5:35. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-5-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Luo X, Yin P, Reierstad S, Ishikawa H, Lin Z, Pavone ME, Zhao H, Marsh EE, Bulun SE. Progesterone and mifepristone regulate L-type amino acid transporter 2 and 4F2 heavy chain expression in uterine leiomyoma cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:4533–4539. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Luo X, Yin P, Coon VJ, Cheng YH, Wiehle RD, Bulun SE. The selective progesterone receptor modulator CDB4124 inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in uterine leiomyoma cells. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2668–2673. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Magalhaes J, Aldrighi JM, de Lima GR. Uterine volume and menstrual patterns in users of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system with idiopathic menorrhagia or menorrhagia due to leiomyomas. Contraception. 2007;75:193–198. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Makarainen L, Ylikorkala O. Primary and myoma-associated menorrhagia: role of prostaglandins and effects of ibuprofen. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;93:974–978. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb08019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Mäkinen N, Heinonen HR, Moore S, Tomlinson IP, van der Spuy ZM, Aaltonen LA. MED12 exon 2 mutations are common in uterine leiomyomas from South African patients. Oncotarget. 2011a;2:966–969. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Mäkinen N, Mehine M, Tolvanen J, Kaasinen E, Li Y, Lehtonen HJ, Gentile M, Yan J, Enge M, Taipale M, et al. MED12, the mediator complex subunit 12 gene, is mutated at high frequency in uterine leiomyomas. Science. 2011b;334:252–255. doi: 10.1126/science.1208930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Mäkinen N, Vahteristo P, Bützow R, Sjöberg J, Aaltonen LA. Exomic landscape of MED12 mutation negative and positive uterine leiomyomas. Int J Cancer. 2013a doi: 10.1002/ijc.28410. doi:10.1002/ijc.28410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Mäkinen N, Vahteristo P, Kämpjärvi K, Arola J, Bützow R, Aaltonen LA. MED12 exon 2 mutations in histopathological uterine leiomyoma variants. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013b;21:1300–1303. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Makker A, Goel MM, Das V, Agarwal A. PI3K-Akt-mTOR and MAPK signaling pathways in polycystic ovarian syndrome, uterine leiomyomas and endometriosis: an update. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012;28:175–181. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2011.583955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Malik M, Catherino WH. Novel method to characterize primary cultures of leiomyoma and myometrium with the use of confirmatory biomarker gene arrays. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:1166–1172. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Malik M, Catherino WH. Development and validation of a three-dimensional in vitro model for uterine leiomyoma and patient-matched myometrium. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:1287–1293. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Malik M, Webb J, Catherino WH. Retinoic acid treatment of human leiomyoma cells transformed the cell phenotype to one strongly resembling myometrial cells. Clin Endocrinol. 2008;69:462–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03207.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Malzoni M, Rotond M, Perone C, Labriola D, Ammaturo F, Izzo A, Panariello S, Reich H. Fertility after laparoscopic myomectomy of large uterine myomas: operative technique and preliminary results. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24:79–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, Kuzel D, Belsan T, Sosna O. Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2008;31:73–85. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9195-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Markowski DN, Bartnitzke S, Belge G, Drieschner N, Helmke BM, Bullerdiek J. Cell culture and senescence in uterine fibroids. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010a;202:53–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Markowski DN, von Ahsen I, Nezhad MH, Wosniok W, Helmke BM, Bullerdiek J. HMGA2 and the p19Arf-TP53-CDKN1A axis: a delicate balance in the growth of uterine leiomyomas. Genes Chromosome Cancer. 2010b;49:661–668. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Marsh EE, Lin Z, Yin P, Milad M, Chakravarti D, Bulun SE. Differential expression of microRNA species in human uterine leiomyoma versus normal myometrium. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1771–1776. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Marshall LM, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, Goldman MB, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Hunter DJ. Variation in the incidence of uterine leiomyoma among premenopausal women by age and race. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:967–973. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00534-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Maruo T, Matsuo H, Samoto T, Shimomura Y, Kurachi O, Gao Z, Wang Y, Spitz IM, Johansson E. Effects of progesterone on uterine leiomyoma growth and apoptosis. Steroids. 2000;65:585–592. doi: 10.1016/s0039-128x(00)00171-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Maruo T, Laoag-Fernandez JB, Pakarinen P, Murakoshi H, Spitz IM, Johansson E. Effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on proliferation and apoptosis in the endometrium. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2103–2108. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.10.2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Maruo T, Ohara N, Wang J, Matsuo H. Sex steroidal regulation of uterine leiomyoma growth and apoptosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:207–220. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Maruo T, Ohara N, Yoshida S, Nakabayashi K, Sasaki H, Xu Q, Chen W, Yamada H. Translational research with progesterone receptor modulator motivated by the use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception. 2010;82:435–441. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Mas A, Cervello I, Gil-Sanchis C, Faus A, Ferro J, Pellicer A, Simon C. Identification and characterization of the human leiomyoma side population as putative tumor-initiating cells. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:741–751 e746. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Matsuo H, Maruo T, Samoto T. Increased expression of Bcl-2 protein in human uterine leiomyoma and its up-regulation by progesterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:293–299. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.1.3650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Mauskopf J, Flynn M, Thieda P, Spalding J, Duchane J. The economic impact of uterine fibroids in the United States: a summary of published estimates. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2005;14:692–703. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. McCarthy-Keith DM, Malik M, Britten J, Segars J, Catherino WH. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist increases expression of osmotic response genes in leiomyoma cells. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2383–2387. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. McGuire MM, Yatsenko A, Hoffner L, Jones M, Surti U, Rajkovic A. Whole exome sequencing in a random sample of North American women with leiomyomas identifies MED12 mutations in majority of uterine leiomyomas. PloS One. 2012;7:e33251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Mehine M, Kaasinen E, Mäkinen N, Katainen R, Kampjarvi K, Pitkanen E, Heinonen HR, Butzow R, Kilpivaara O, Kuosmanen A, et al. Characterization of uterine leiomyomas by whole-genome sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:43–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Mesquita FS, Dyer SN, Heinrich DA, Bulun SE, Marsh EE, Nowak RA. Reactive oxygen species mediate mitogenic growth factor signaling pathways in human leiomyoma smooth muscle cells. Biol Reprod. 2010;82:341–351. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.075887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Mihalich A, Vigano P, Gentilini D, Borghi MO, Vignali M, Busacca M, Di Blasio A. Interferon-inducible genes, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and interferon inducible protein 27 (IFI27) are negatively regulated in leiomyomas: implications for a role of the interferon pathway in leiomyoma development. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012;28:216–219. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2011.588746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Mintz Y, Horgan S, Cullen J, Ramamoorthy S, Chock A, Savu MK, Easter DW, Talamini MA. NOTES: the hybrid technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17:402–406. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.0225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Moore SD, Herrick SR, Ince TA, Kleinman MS, Dal Cin P, Morton CC, Quade BJ. Uterine leiomyomata with t(10;17) disrupt the histone acetyltransferase MORF. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5570–5577. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Moore AB, Castro L, Yu L, Zheng X, Di X, Sifre MI, Kissling GE, Newbold RR, Bortner CD, Dixon D. Stimulatory and inhibitory effects of genistein on human uterine leiomyoma cell proliferation are influenced by the concentration. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2623–2631. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Moore AB, Flake GP, Swartz CD, Heartwell G, Cousins D, Haseman JK, Kissling GE, Sidawy MK, Dixon D. Association of race, age and body mass index with gross pathology of uterine fibroids. J Reprod Med. 2008;53:90–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Moore AB, Yu L, Swartz CD, Zheng X, Wang L, Castro L, Kissling GE, Walmer DK, Robboy SJ, Dixon D. Human uterine leiomyoma-derived fibroblasts stimulate uterine leiomyoma cell proliferation and collagen type I production, and activate RTKs and TGF beta receptor signaling in coculture. Cell Commun Signal. 2010;8:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-8-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Moss JG, Cooper KG, Khaund A, Murray LS, Murray GD, Wu O, Craig LE, Lumsden MA. Randomised comparison of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) with surgical treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (REST trial): 5-year results. BJOG. 2011;118:936–944. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Mozzachio K, Linder K, Dixon D. Uterine smooth muscle tumors in potbellied pigs (Sus scrofa) resemble human fibroids: a potential animal model. Toxicol Pathol. 2004;32:402–407. doi: 10.1080/01926230490440880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Mutter GL, Bergeron C, Deligdisch L, Ferenczy A, Glant M, Merino M, Williams AR, Blithe DL. The spectrum of endometrial pathology induced by progesterone receptor modulators. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:591–598. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Nair S, Al-Hendy A. Adipocytes enhance the proliferation of human leiomyoma cells via TNF-alpha proinflammatory cytokine. Reprod Sci. 2011;18:1186–1192. doi: 10.1177/1933719111408111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Navarro A, Yin P, Monsivais D, Lin SM, Du P, Wei JJ, Bulun SE. Genome-wide DNA methylation indicates silencing of tumor suppressor genes in uterine leiomyoma. PloS One. 2012;7:e33284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Newbold RR, DiAugustine RP, Risinger JI, Everitt JI, Walmer DK, Parrott EC, Dixon D. Advances in uterine leiomyoma research: conference overview, summary, and future research recommendations. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(Suppl. 5):769–773. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s5769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Newbold RR, Moore AB, Dixon D. Characterization of uterine leiomyomas in CD-1 mice following developmental exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) Toxicologic pathology. 2002;30:611–616. doi: 10.1080/01926230290105839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Newbold RR, Jefferson WN, Padilla-Banks E. Long-term adverse effects of neonatal exposure to bisphenol A on the murine female reproductive tract. Reprod Toxicol. 2007;24:253–258. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy–a retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:556–559. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Nieman LK, Blocker W, Nansel T, Mahoney S, Reynolds J, Blithe D, Wesley R, Armstrong A. Efficacy and tolerability of CDB-2914 treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:767–772. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.059. e761–762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Nodler J, Segars JH. Evidence-based indications for treatment of uterine fibroids in gynecology. In: Segars J, editor. Fibroids. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013. pp. 24–35. [Google Scholar]
  186. Norian JM, Malik M, Parker CY, Joseph D, Leppert PC, Segars JH, Catherino WH. Transforming growth factor beta3 regulates the versican variants in the extracellular matrix-rich uterine leiomyomas. Reprod Sci. 2009;16:1153–1164. doi: 10.1177/1933719109343310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Norian JM, Owen CM, Taboas J, Korecki C, Tuan R, Malik M, Catherino WH, Segars JH. Characterization of tissue biomechanics and mechanical signaling in uterine leiomyoma. Matrix Biol. 2012;31:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2011.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Olive DL, Lindheim SR, Pritts EA. Non-surgical management of leiomyoma: impact on fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;16:239–243. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200406000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Ono M, Maruyama T, Masuda H, Kajitani T, Nagashima T, Arase T, Ito M, Ohta K, Uchida H, Asada H, et al. Side population in human uterine myometrium displays phenotypic and functional characteristics of myometrial stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:18700–18705. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704472104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Ono M, Qiang W, Serna VA, Yin P, Coon JS, 5th, Navarro A, Monsivais D, Kakinuma T, Dyson M, Druschitz S, et al. Role of stem cells in human uterine leiomyoma growth. PloS One. 2012;7:e36935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Pan Q, Luo X, Chegini N. Genomic and proteomic profiling I: leiomyomas in African Americans and Caucasians. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2007;5:34. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-5-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Parker WH. Etiology, symptomatology, and diagnosis of uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. 2007a;87:725–736. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Parker WH. Uterine myomas: management. Fertil Steril. 2007b;88:255–271. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Parker JD, Malik M, Catherino WH. Human myometrium and leiomyomas express gonadotropin-releasing hormone 2 and gonadotropin-releasing hormone 2 receptor. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Parsanezhad ME, Azmoon M, Alborzi S, Rajaeefard A, Zarei A, Kazerooni T, Frank V, Schmidt EH. A randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (triptorelin) on uterine leiomyoma volume and hormonal status. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:192–198. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Ross S, Moore M, Gunnarsson C. Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:730–738. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:286–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Peddada SD, Laughlin SK, Miner K, Guyon JP, Haneke K, Vahdat HL, Semelka RC, Kowalik A, Armao D, Davis B, et al. Growth of uterine leiomyomata among premenopausal black and white women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:19887–19892. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808188105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Peng Y, Laser J, Shi G, Mittal K, Melamed J, Lee P, Wei JJ. Antiproliferative effects by Let-7 repression of high-mobility group A2 in uterine leiomyoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6:663–673. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-0370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Peng L, Wen Y, Han Y, Wei A, Shi G, Mizuguchi M, Lee P, Hernando E, Mittal K, Wei JJ. Expression of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF signaling: molecular complexity in uterine leiomyomas. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2664–2675. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Pietrowski D, Thewes R, Sator M, Denschlag D, Keck C, Tempfer C. Uterine leiomyoma is associated with a polymorphism in the interleukin 1-beta gene. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2009;62:112–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00718.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Promislow JH, Makarushka CM, Gorman JR, Howards PP, Savitz DA, Hartmann KE. Recruitment for a community-based study of early pregnancy: the Right From The Start study. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2004;18:143–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2003.00546.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Pron G, Bennett J, Common A, Wall J, Asch M, Sniderman K. The Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial. Part 2. Uterine fibroid reduction and symptom relief after uterine artery embolization for fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:120–127. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04538-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Pron G, Mocarski E, Bennett J, Vilos G, Common A, Vanderburgh L. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: the Ontario multicenter trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:67–76. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000149156.07061.1f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Qu X, Cheng Z, Yang W, Xu L, Dai H, Hu L. Controlled clinical trial assessing the effect of laparoscopic uterine arterial occlusion on ovarian reserve. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Rabinovici J, David M, Fukunishi H, Morita Y, Gostout BS, Stewart EA. Pregnancy outcome after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for conservative treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Radin RG, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L, Kumanyika SK, Wise LA. Dietary glycemic index and load in relation to risk of uterine leiomyomata in the Black Women's Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:1281–1288. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N, Bouret JM, Houdart E, Aymard A, Merland JJ. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata. Lancet. 1995;346:671–672. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92282-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Reed SD, Newton KM, Thompson LB, McCrummen BA, Warolin AK. The incidence of repeat uterine surgery following myomectomy. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006;15:1046–1052. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Ridker PM, Chasman DI, Zee RY, Parker A, Rose L, Cook NR, Buring JE. Rationale, design, and methodology of the Women's Genome Health Study: a genome-wide association study of more than 25,000 initially healthy american women. Clin Chem. 2008;54:249–255. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.099366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Roeder H, Jayes F, Feng L, Leppert PC. CDB-4124 does not cause apoptosis in cultured fibroid cells. Reprod Sci. 2011;18:850–857. doi: 10.1177/1933719111399929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Rogers R, Norian J, Malik M, Christman G, Abu-Asab M, Chen F, Korecki C, Iatridis J, Catherino WH, Tuan RS, et al. Mechanical homeostasis is altered in uterine leiomyoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:474 e471–411. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Romagnolo B, Molina T, Leroy G, Blin C, Porteux A, Thomasset M, Vandewalle A, Kahn A, Perret C. Estradiol-dependent uterine leiomyomas in transgenic mice. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:777–784. doi: 10.1172/JCI118850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Roshdy E, Rajaratnam V, Maitra S, Sabry M, Allah AS, Al-Hendy A. Treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids with green tea extract: a pilot randomized controlled clinical study. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:477–486. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S41021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Sahin K, Akdemir F, Tuzcu M, Sahin N, Onderci M, Ozercan R, Ilhan N, Kilic E, Seren S, Kucuk O. Genistein suppresses spontaneous oviduct tumorigenesis in quail. Nutr Cancer. 2009a;61:799–806. doi: 10.1080/01635580903285163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Sahin N, Tuzcu M, Ozercan I, Sahin K, Prasad AS, Kucuk O. Zinc picolinate in the prevention of leiomyoma in Japanese quail. J Med food. 2009b;12:1368–1374. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2008.0287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Salama SA, Kamel M, Christman G, Wang HQ, Fouad HM, Al-Hendy A. Gene therapy of uterine leiomyoma: adenovirus-mediated herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir treatment inhibits growth of human and rat leiomyoma cells in vitro and in a nude mouse model. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2007;63:61–70. doi: 10.1159/000095627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150:92–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Senturk LM, Sozen I, Gutierrez L, Arici A. Interleukin 8 production and interleukin 8 receptor expression in human myometrium and leiomyoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:559–566. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.111160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Sharan C, Halder SK, Thota C, Jaleel T, Nair S, Al-Hendy A. Vitamin D inhibits proliferation of human uterine leiomyoma cells via catechol-O-methyltransferase. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:247–253. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Sheiner E, Bashiri A, Levy A, Hershkovitz R, Katz M, Mazor M. Obstetric characteristics and perinatal outcome of pregnancies with uterine leiomyomas. J Reprod Med. 2004;49:182–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Shime H, Kariya M, Orii A, Momma C, Kanamori T, Fukuhara K, Kusakari T, Tsuruta Y, Takakura K, Nikaido T, et al. Tranilast inhibits the proliferation of uterine leiomyoma cells in vitro through G1 arrest associated with the induction of p21(waf1) and p53. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:5610–5617. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Shimomura Y, Matsuo H, Samoto T, Maruo T. Up-regulation by progesterone of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and epidermal growth factor expression in human uterine leiomyoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:2192–2198. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.6.4879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Shozu M, Murakami K, Segawa T, Kasai T, Inoue M. Successful treatment of a symptomatic uterine leiomyoma in a perimenopausal woman with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:628–631. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04761-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Shozu M, Murakami K, Inoue M. Aromatase and leiomyoma of the uterus. Semin Reprod Med. 2004;22:51–60. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-823027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Shushan A, Rojansky N, Laufer N, Klein BY, Shlomai Z, Levitzki R, Hartzstark Z, Ben-Bassat H. The AG1478 tyrosine kinase inhibitor is an effective suppressor of leiomyoma cell growth. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1957–1967. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Shushan A, Ben-Bassat H, Mishani E, Laufer N, Klein BY, Rojansky N. Inhibition of leiomyoma cell proliferation in vitro by genistein and the protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor TKS050. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Somigliana E, Vercellini P, Daguati R, Pasin R, De Giorgi O, Crosignani PG. Fibroids and female reproduction: a critical analysis of the evidence. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:465–476. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmm013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Spies JB, Ascher SA, Roth AR, Kim J, Levy EB, Gomez-Jorge J. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:29–34. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01382-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Spitz IM. Clinical utility of progesterone receptor modulators and their effect on the endometrium. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21:318–324. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32832e07e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids. Lancet. 2001;357:293–298. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03622-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Stewart EA, Rabinovici J, Tempany CM, Inbar Y, Regan L, Gostout B, Hesley G, Kim HS, Hengst S, Gedroyc WM. Clinical outcomes of focused ultrasound surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Stewart L, Glenn GM, Stratton P, Goldstein AM, Merino MJ, Tucker MA, Linehan WM, Toro JR. Association of germline mutations in the fumarate hydratase gene and uterine fibroids in women with hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:1584–1592. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2008.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Stovall DW. Clinical symptomatology of uterine leiomyomas. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;44:364–371. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200106000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Suo G, Jiang Y, Cowan B, Wang JY. Platelet-derived growth factor C is upregulated in human uterine fibroids and regulates uterine smooth muscle cell growth. Biol Reprod. 2009a;81:749–758. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.109.076869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Suo G, Sadarangani A, Lamarca B, Cowan B, Wang JY. Murine xenograft model for human uterine fibroids: an in vivo imaging approach. Reprod Sci. 2009b;16:827–842. doi: 10.1177/1933719109336615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Surrey ES, Lietz AK, Schoolcraft WB. Impact of intramural leiomyomata in patients with a normal endometrial cavity on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle outcome. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:405–410. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01714-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Swartz CD, Afshari CA, Yu L, Hall KE, Dixon D. Estrogen-induced changes in IGF-I, Myb family and MAP kinase pathway genes in human uterine leiomyoma and normal uterine smooth muscle cell lines. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005;11:441–450. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Sweet S, Legro RS, Coney P. A comparison of methods and results in recruiting white and black women into reproductive studies: the MMC-PSU cooperative center on reproduction experience. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008;29:478–481. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Tanfin Z, Breuiller-Fouche M. The endothelin axis in uterine leiomyomas: new insights. Biol Reprod. 2012;87:5. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.111.097725. 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Tang XM, Dou Q, Zhao Y, McLean F, Davis J, Chegini N. The expression of transforming growth factor-beta s and TGF-beta receptor mRNA and protein and the effect of TGF-beta s on human myometrial smooth muscle cells in vitro. Mol Hum Reprod. 1997;3:233–240. doi: 10.1093/molehr/3.3.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Tanwar PS, Lee HJ, Zhang L, Zukerberg LR, Taketo MM, Rueda BR, Teixeira JM. Constitutive activation of Beta-catenin in uterine stroma and smooth muscle leads to the development of mesenchymal tumors in mice. Biol Reprod. 2009;81:545–552. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.075648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Taran FA, Brown HL, Stewart EA. Racial diversity in uterine leiomyoma clinical studies. Fertil Steril. 2010a;94:1500–1503. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Taran FA, Hesley GK, Gorny KR, Stewart EA. What factors currently limit magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound of leiomyomas? A survey conducted at the first international symposium devoted to clinical magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. Fertil Steril. 2010b;94:331–334. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Taylor DK, Leppert PC. Treatment for Uterine Fibroids: Searching for Effective Drug Therapies. Drug Discov Today Ther Strateg. 2012;9:e41–e49. doi: 10.1016/j.ddstr.2012.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Tempany CM, Stewart EA, McDannold N, Quade BJ, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study. Radiology. 2003;226:897–905. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2271020395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Toro JR, Nickerson ML, Wei MH, Warren MB, Glenn GM, Turner ML, Stewart L, Duray P, Tourre O, Sharma N, et al. Mutations in the fumarate hydratase gene cause hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer in families in North America. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:95–106. doi: 10.1086/376435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Tsibris JC, Segars J, Coppola D, Mane S, Wilbanks GD, O'Brien WF, Spellacy WN. Insights from gene arrays on the development and growth regulation of uterine leiomyomata. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:114–121. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03191-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Tsuiji K, Takeda T, Li B, Kondo A, Ito M, Yaegashi N. Establishment of a novel xenograft model for human uterine leiomyoma in immunodeficient mice. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2010;222:55–61. doi: 10.1620/tjem.222.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Tsuiji K, Takeda T, Li B, Wakabayashi A, Kondo A, Kimura T, Yaegashi N. Inhibitory effect of curcumin on uterine leiomyoma cell proliferation. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27:512–517. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2010.507287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. van der Kooij SM, Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Birnie E, Ankum WM, Reekers JA. Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 5-year outcome from the randomized EMMY trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:105 e101–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Varelas FK, Papanicolaou AN, Vavatsi-Christaki N, Makedos GA, Vlassis GD. The effect of anastrazole on symptomatic uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:643–649. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000279151.20878.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  253. Varghese BV, Koohestani F, McWilliams M, Colvin A, Gunewardena S, Kinsey WH, Nowak RA, Nothnick WB, Chennathukuzhi VM. Loss of the repressor REST in uterine fibroids promotes aberrant G protein-coupled receptor 10 expression and activates mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:2187–2192. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215759110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  254. Vercellini P, Trespidi L, Zaina B, Vicentini S, Stellato G, Crosignani PG. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment before abdominal myomectomy: a controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1390–1395. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00362-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Vines AI, Ta M, Esserman DA. The association between self-reported major life events and the presence of uterine fibroids. Women's Health Issues. 2010;20:294–298. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  256. Viswanathan M, Hartmann K, McKoy N, Stuart G, Rankins N, Thieda P, Lux LJ, Lohr KN. Management of uterine fibroids: an update of the evidence. Evid Rep/Technol Assess. 2007:1–122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. Volkers NA, Hehenkamp WJ, Birnie E, Ankum WM, Reekers JA. Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 2 years' outcome from the randomized EMMY trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(519):e511–511. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  258. Wakabayashi A, Takeda T, Tsuiji K, Li B, Sakata M, Morishige K, Yaegashi N, Kimura T. Antiproliferative effect of adiponectin on rat uterine leiomyoma ELT-3 cells. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27:33–38. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2010.487605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  259. Walker CL. Role of hormonal and reproductive factors in the etiology and treatment of uterine leiomyoma. Recent Progr Hormone Res. 2002;57:277–294. doi: 10.1210/rp.57.1.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  260. Walker CL, Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids: the elephant in the room. Science. 2005;308:1589–1592. doi: 10.1126/science.1112063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  261. Walker CL, Burroughs KD, Davis B, Sowell K, Everitt JI, Fuchs-Young R. Preclinical evidence for therapeutic efficacy of selective estrogen receptor modulators for uterine leiomyoma. J Soc Gynecol Invest. 2000;7:249–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Walker CL, Hunter D, Everitt JI. Uterine leiomyoma in the Eker rat: a unique model for important diseases of women. Genes Chromosomse Cancer. 2003;38:349–356. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  263. Wang T, Zhang X, Obijuru L, Laser J, Aris V, Lee P, Mittal K, Soteropoulos P, Wei JJ. A micro-RNA signature associated with race, tumor size, and target gene activity in human uterine leiomyomas. Genes Chromosome Cancer. 2007;46:336–347. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Wei LH, Torng PL, Hsiao SM, Jeng YM, Chen MW, Chen CA. Histone deacetylase 6 regulates estrogen receptor alpha in uterine leiomyoma. Reprod Sci. 2011;18:755–762. doi: 10.1177/1933719111398147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  265. Weiss G, Noorhasan D, Schott LL, Powell L, Randolph JF, Jr, Johnston JM. Racial differences in women who have a hysterectomy for benign conditions. Women Health Issues. 2009;19:202–210. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2009.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  266. Weuve J, Hauser R, Calafat AM, Missmer SA, Wise LA. Association of exposure to phthalates with endometriosis and uterine leiomyomata: findings from NHANES, 1999–2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:825–832. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  267. Whirledge S, Dixon D, Cidlowski JA. Glucocorticoids regulate gene expression and repress cellular proliferation in human uterine leiomyoma cells. Hormones Cancer. 2012;3:79–92. doi: 10.1007/s12672-012-0103-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. Wilkens J, Chwalisz K, Han C, Walker J, Cameron IT, Ingamells S, Lawrence AC, Lumsden MA, Hapangama D, Williams AR, et al. Effects of the selective progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil on uterine artery blood flow, ovarian activity, and clinical symptoms in patients with uterine leiomyomata scheduled for hysterectomy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4664–4671. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Williams AR, Bergeron C, Barlow DH, Ferenczy A. Endometrial morphology after treatment of uterine fibroids with the selective progesterone receptor modulator, ulipristal acetate. Int J Gynecol Pathology. 2012;31:556–569. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e318251035b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Wise LA, Palmer JR, Harlow BL, Spiegelman D, Stewart EA, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L. Risk of uterine leiomyomata in relation to tobacco, alcohol and caffeine consumption in the Black Women's Health Study. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1746–1754. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Wise LA, Palmer JR, Spiegelman D, Harlow BL, Stewart EA, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L. Influence of body size and body fat distribution on risk of uterine leiomyomata in U.S. black women. Epidemiology. 2005a;16:346–354. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000158742.11877.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Wise LA, Palmer JR, Stewart EA, Rosenberg L. Age-specific incidence rates for self-reported uterine leiomyomata in the Black Women's Health Study. Obstet Gynecol. 2005b;105:563–568. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000154161.03418.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Wise LA, Palmer JR, Cozier YC, Hunt MO, Stewart EA, Rosenberg L. Perceived racial discrimination and risk of uterine leiomyomata. Epidemiology. 2007;18:747–757. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181567e92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Wise LA, Radin RG, Palmer JR, Kumanyika SK, Rosenberg L. A prospective study of dairy intake and risk of uterine leiomyomata. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171:221–232. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  275. Wise LA, Radin RG, Palmer JR, Kumanyika SK, Boggs DA, Rosenberg L. Intake of fruit, vegetables, and carotenoids in relation to risk of uterine leiomyomata. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:1620–1631. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.016600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  276. Wolanska M, Bankowski E. Fibroblast growth factors (FGF) in human myometrium and uterine leiomyomas in various stages of tumour growth. Biochimie. 2006;88:141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2005.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  277. Wolanska M, Malkowski A, Romanowicz L, Bankowski E. Does vascular endothelial growth factor participate in uterine myoma growth stimulation? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;164:93–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  278. Xu Q, Ohara N, Chen W, Liu J, Sasaki H, Morikawa A, Sitruk-Ware R, Johansson ED, Maruo T. Progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 down-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor, adrenomedullin and their receptors and modulates progesterone receptor content in cultured human uterine leiomyoma cells. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2408–2416. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  279. Xu Q, Ohara N, Liu J, Amano M, Sitruk-Ware R, Yoshida S, Maruo T. Progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 induces extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer in cultured human uterine leiomyoma cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14:181–191. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gan004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  280. Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J, Lee SH, Kwon HY, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim JH, Kim YT, Kim SW. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:26 e21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  281. Yin P, Lin Z, Cheng YH, Marsh EE, Utsunomiya H, Ishikawa H, Xue Q, Reierstad S, Innes J, Thung S, et al. Progesterone receptor regulates Bcl-2 gene expression through direct binding to its promoter region in uterine leiomyoma cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4459–4466. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  282. Yin P, Lin Z, Reierstad S, Wu J, Ishikawa H, Marsh EE, Innes J, Cheng Y, Pearson K, Coon JS, 5th, et al. Transcription factor KLF11 integrates progesterone receptor signaling and proliferation in uterine leiomyoma cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70:1722–1730. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Yin P, Roqueiro D, Huang L, Owen JK, Xie A, Navarro A, Monsivais D, Coon JS, 5th, Kim JJ, Dai Y, et al. Genome-wide progesterone receptor binding: cell type-specific and shared mechanisms in T47D breast cancer cells and primary leiomyoma cells. PloS One. 2012;7:e29021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  284. Ying Z, Weiyuan Z. Dual actions of progesterone on uterine leiomyoma correlate with the ratio of progesterone receptor A:B. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25:520–523. doi: 10.1080/09513590902972117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  285. Yoshida S, Ohara N, Xu Q, Chen W, Wang J, Nakabayashi K, Sasaki H, Morikawa A, Maruo T. Cell-type specific actions of progesterone receptor modulators in the regulation of uterine leiomyoma growth. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28:260–273. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1251483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  286. Yu L, Saile K, Swartz CD, He H, Zheng X, Kissling GE, Di X, Lucas S, Robboy SJ, Dixon D. Differential expression of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and IGF-I pathway activation in human uterine leiomyomas. Mol Med. 2008;14:264–275. doi: 10.2119/2007-00101.Yu. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  287. Yu L, Moore AB, Dixon D. Receptor tyrosine kinases and their hormonal regulation in uterine leiomyomas. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28:250–259. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1251482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  288. Yu L, Moore AB, Castro L, Gao X, Huynh HL, Klippel M, Flagler ND, Lu Y, Kissling GE, Dixon D. Estrogen Regulates MAPK-Related Genes through Genomic and Nongenomic Interactions between IGF-I Receptor Tyrosine Kinase and Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Signaling Pathways in Human Uterine Leiomyoma Cells. J Signal Transduct. 2012;2012:204236. doi: 10.1155/2012/204236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  289. Zavadil J, Ye H, Liu Z, Wu J, Lee P, Hernando E, Soteropoulos P, Toruner GA, Wei JJ. Profiling and functional analyses of microRNAs and their target gene products in human uterine leiomyomas. PloS One. 2010;5:e12362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  290. Zhang D, Al-Hendy M, Richard-Davis G, Montgomery-Rice V, Rajaratnam V, Al-Hendy A. Antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of epigallocatechin gallate on human leiomyoma cells. Fertil Steril. 2010a;94:1887–1893. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  291. Zhang D, Al-Hendy M, Richard-Davis G, Montgomery-Rice V, Sharan C, Rajaratnam V, Khurana A, Al-Hendy A. Green tea extract inhibits proliferation of uterine leiomyoma cells in vitro and in nude mice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010b;202:289 e281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Reproduction Update are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES