Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2014 Apr 24;2(2):e00325-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00325-14

Draft Genome Sequence of Lysobacter capsici AZ78, a Bacterium Antagonistic to Plant-Pathogenic Oomycetes

Gerardo Puopolo a,, Paolo Sonego b, Kristof Engelen b, Ilaria Pertot a
PMCID: PMC3999494  PMID: 24762937

Abstract

Lysobacter capsici AZ78, isolated from tobacco rhizosphere, effectively controls Phytophthora infestans and Plasmopara viticola on tomato and grapevine plants, respectively. We report the first draft genome sequence of the L. capsici species.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The bacterial genus Lysobacter (1) represents a source of biocontrol agents capable of protecting plants against diseases caused by pathogenic microorganisms (2). The species Lysobacter capsici encompasses a few bacterial strains that effectively control different plant-pathogenic bacteria, fungi, nematodes, and oomycetes (36). Recently, we demonstrated that applications of L. capsici AZ78 can control Phytophthora infestans and Plasmopara viticola, which are two remarkable plant-pathogenic oomycetes of tomatoes and grapevines, respectively (7; G. Puopolo, A. Cimmino, M. C. Palmieri, O. Giovannini, A. Evidente, and I. Pertot, submitted for publication). Because of its importance as a potential biocontrol agent, we analyzed the draft genome sequence of L. capsici AZ78.

The genome of L. capsici AZ78 was sequenced by using the Illumina GAIIx system. A total of 7,512,266 filtered reads for L. capsici AZ78 were assembled into 142 contigs (N50 length, 139,986 bp), with an average coverage of 40.0×, using the A5 pipeline (8). The genome consists of 6,315,650 bases with 102 contigs of > 1,000 bp each and a G+C content of 66.43%, which is similar to the content of the type strain of the L. capsici species (65.4% [3]). The genome annotations were performed by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genomes Annotation Pipeline utilizing GeneMarkS (9). Automated annotation was performed using the RAST annotation server (10). The L. capsici AZ78 genome contains 5,448 predicted coding sequences. Most of the coding sequences (3,654) do not belong to the RAST subsystems, while of the remaining sequences, 1,794 were assigned functions and 93 were considered to encode hypothetical proteins. The number of genes coding for RNAs was determined by using the software Barnap implemented in Prokka (11). The L. capsici AZ78 genome contains 93 predicted RNAs, of which 1 is a transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), 7 are rRNAs, and 85 are tRNAs.

The RAST analysis brought out the presence of genes coding for resistance to drugs and heavy metals. Additionally, this analysis showed that the L. capsici AZ78 genome contains genes involved in copper ion transport, homeostasis, uptake, and resistance, a property that made it possible to combine this biological control agent with copper-based fungicides (7).

As expected, the L. capsici AZ78 genome contains a high number of genes coding for lytic enzymes (2). Specifically, the lytic weaponry of L. capsici AZ78 encompasses chitinases, glucanases, lipases, xylanases, and several enzymes with proteolytic activity.

The availability of the draft genome of L. capsici AZ78 will help elucidate the mechanism of action of this bacterial strain against plant-pathogenic oomycetes and will give background knowledge that is useful for the registration of L. capsici AZ78 as an active ingredient in plant protection products.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. JAJA00000000. The version described in this paper is version JAJA01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The present research was supported by the EU-project CO-FREE (theme KBBE.2011.1.2-06, grant agreement 289497).

Footnotes

Citation Puopolo G, Sonego P, Engelen K, Pertot I. 2014. Draft genome sequence of Lysobacter capsici AZ78, a bacterium antagonistic to plant-pathogenic oomycetes. Genome Announc. 2(2):e00325-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00325-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Christensen P, Cook FD. 1978. Lysobacter, a new genus of nonfruiting, gliding bacteria with a high base ratio. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 28:367–393. 10.1099/00207713-28-3-367 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hayward AC, Fegan N, Fegan M, Stirling GR. 2010. Stenotrophomonas and Lysobacter: ubiquitous plant-associated gamma-proteobacteria of developing significance in applied microbiology. J. Appl. Microbiol. 108:756–770. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04471.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Park JH, Kim R, Aslam Z, Jeon CO, Chung YR. 2008. Lysobacter capsici sp. nov., with antimicrobial activity, isolated from the rhizosphere of pepper, and emended description of the genus Lysobacter. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58:387–392. 10.1099/ijs.0.65290-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Puopolo G, Raio A, Zoina A. 2010. Identification and characterization of Lysobacter capsici strain PG4: a new plant health-promoting rhizobacterium. J. Plant Pathol. 92:157–164 [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Postma J, Nijhuis EH, Yassin AF. 2010. Genotypic and phenotypic variation among Lysobacter capsici strains isolated from Rhizoctonia suppressive soils. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 33:232–235. 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lee YS, Park YS, Anees M, Kim YC, Kim YH, Kim KY. 2013. Nematicidal activity of Lysobacter capsici YS1215 and the role of gelatinolytic proteins against root-knot nematodes. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 23:1427–1441. 10.1080/09583157.2013.840359 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Puopolo G, Giovannini O, Pertot I. 27 September 2013. Lysobacter capsici AZ78 can be combined with copper to effectively control Plasmopara viticola on grapevine. Microbiol. Res. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Tritt A, Eisen JA, Facciotti MT, Darling AE. 2012. An integrated pipeline for de novo assembly of microbial genomes. PLoS One 7:e42304. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GenemarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2607–2618. 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Seemann T. 18 March 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES