Skip to main content
Journal of Toxicologic Pathology logoLink to Journal of Toxicologic Pathology
. 2014 Apr 30;27(1):1–10. doi: 10.1293/tox.2013-0062

Mechanisms of Mycotoxin-induced Dermal Toxicity and Tumorigenesis Through Oxidative Stress-related Pathways

Kunio Doi 1,2,*, Koji Uetsuka 3
PMCID: PMC4000067  PMID: 24791061

Abstract

Among the many mycotoxins, T-2 toxin, citrinin (CTN), patulin (PAT), aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and ochratoxin A (OTA) are known to have the potential to induce dermal toxicity and/or tumorigenesis in rodent models. T-2 toxin, CTN, PAT and OTA induce apoptosis in mouse or rat skin. PAT, AFB1 and OTA have tumor initiating properties, and OTA is also a tumor promoter in mouse skin. This paper reviews the molecular mechanisms of dermal toxicity and tumorigenesis induced in rodent models by these mycotoxins especially from the viewpoint of oxidative stress-mediated pathways.

Keywords: dermal toxicity, dermal tumorigenesis, T-2 toxin, citrinin, patulin, aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A

Introduction

Mycotoxins are fungal metabolites known to be harmful to human and animal health. To date, there are many reports of disorders caused by mycotoxins in the digestive, urinary, immune and reproduction systems1, and the importance of oxidative stress through lipid peroxidation has been stressed as a trigger of mycotoxin-induced toxicity in these systems2,3,4,5,6. Recently, Doi and Uetsuka7 reviewed the molecular mechanisms of neurotoxicity induced in rodent models by four kinds of mycotoxins, T-2 toxin, macrocyclic trichothecenes, fumonisin B1 (FB1) and ochratoxin A (OTA), from the viewpoint of oxidative stress-associated pathways.

The FAO8 and WHO9 have highlighted the need for toxicological evaluation of mycotoxins through dermal exposure. This is important because the skin is the major interface between the body and surrounding environment, and there is a chance that the skin of grain handling workers as well as of domestic animals is exposed to mycotoxins10,11,12. Concerning this point, it has been shown that such mycotoxins as aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)13,14,15 and T-2 toxin14, 16, 17 readily penetrate through human and animal skin and cause systemic toxic effects in their respective organs and also in the brain18. Recently, Boonen et al. examined the transdermal kinetics of seven kinds of mycotoxins, AFB1, OTA, FB1, citrinin (CTN), zearalenone (ZEN) and T-2 toxin, using human skin in an in vitro Franz diffusion cell setup19, and they reported that except for FB1, all mycotoxins penetrate through the skin and that OTA shows the highest penetration19. However, there have been few reports of toxic effects of mycotoxins on human skin.

Except for skin lesions induced by T-2 toxin20,21,22,23,24,25, only limited information on mycotoxin-induced dermal toxicity has been available even in animal models. However, during the last decade, several researchers have added more information on dermal toxicity and/or tumorigenesis induced in mice by topical application of AFB115, patulin (PAT)26, 27, CTN12 and OTA28, 29. This paper reviews the molecular mechanisms of dermal toxicity and tumorigenesis experimentally induced in mice or rats by T-2 toxin, CTN, PAT, AFB1 and OTA especially from the viewpoint of oxidative stress-related pathways.

Mycotoxin-induced Dermal Toxicity andTumorigenesis

T-2 toxin

T-2 toxin is a cytotoxic secondary fungal metabolite that belongs to the trichothecene mycotoxin family. It is produced by various species of Fusarium (F. sporotrichioides, F. poae, F. equiseti and F. acuminatum), which can infect corn, wheat, barley and rice crops in the field or during storage30, 31. T-2 toxin is a well-known inhibitor of protein synthesis through its high binding affinity to peptidyl transferase32. Subsequent inhibition of the peptidyl transferase reaction can trigger a ribotoxic stress response that activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs)33. In addition, T-2 toxin inhibits the synthesis of DNA and RNA probably secondary to inhibition of protein synthesis32, 34, interferes with the metabolism of membrane phospholipids and increases liver lipid peroxides (LPOs)35, 36. Moreover, oxidative stress is thought to be the main factor underlying the T-2 toxin-induced toxicity3,4,5, 7.

As mentioned above, it has been reported that topical exposure to T-2 toxin could induce histopathological changes in the skin of several animal species, and Yarom et al. suggested that T-2 toxin-induced epidermal degeneration might be secondary to ischemia brought about by microvessel degeneration in the dermis22. In 1999, Albarenque et al. started a series of studies to clarify the mechanisms of T-2 toxin-induced dermal toxicity using Wistar-derived hypotrichotic WBN/ILA-Ht rats37, 38 focusing on the expression of apoptosis-related oncogenes and cytokines10. In their first study, they clarified that after topical application of T-2 toxin, depression of proliferating activity starts at 3 h and that apoptosis of basal cells starts soon after and becomes prominent at 12 h in the epidermis, while capillary and small vessel endothelial degeneration develops at 6 h in the dermis10; this suggests the direct toxic effect of T-2 toxin on the epidermis10. This is the first report of mycotoxin-induced apoptosis in the skin10.

Thereafter, using the same experimental system, Albarenque et al. showed that the expression of oncogenes (c-jun and c-fos) as well as cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1β) mRNAs is significantly elevated prior to the peak time of apoptosis in keratinocytes after topical exposure to T-2 toxin39, 40. They also reported that the level of TGF-β1 mRNA of the whole skin tissue shows a slight elevation from 6 to 12 h and reaches a significantly higher level at 24 h and that the increase in signals of TGF-β1 mRNA detected by the in situ hybridization method starts at 3 h in the epidermis and progresses thereafter both in the epidermis and dermis41. Later, using rat keratinocyte primary cultures, they also showed that c-fos and c-jun and TNF-α and IL-1β play an important role in the development of T-2 toxin-induced apoptosis in keratinocytes42.

C-fos is a type of immediate-early response gene, and its activation with other factors such as c-jun occurs as an early response to cell injury, resulting in an increase in the sensitivity of keratinocytes to apoptosis43, and the expression of c-fos is said to precede the initiation of apoptosis or to be concomitant with apoptosis in many systems43,44,45.

Keratinocytes can release pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β when they have been injured46, 47. There are many reports suggesting the possible role of TNF-α as an apoptosis-inducer in different kinds of cells including keratinocytes48, 49. TNF-α can interact with its receptors50, and signals from the receptors are related to the induction of some genes and proteins such as c-myc, c-fos and caspase, resulting in the induction of apoptosis51. TGF-β1 is a multifunctional cytokine and is known as a negative growth regulator of normal epithelial cells52, and human keratinocytes can undergo apoptosis after initial growth arrest under the effect of TGF-β153. TGF-β1 may have a relation to the early depression of epidermal basal cell proliferating activity in rat skin following topical application of T-2 toxin41.

As mentioned above, trichothecenes mycotoxins trigger a ribotoxic stress response that activates JNK/p3833, and JNK/p38 stimulates immediate-early genes, c-fos and c-jun, both of which encode components of transcription factor activator protein-1 (AP-1)54. In this regard, the c-fos gene plays an important role in the early phase of T-2 toxin-induced apoptosis in the lymphoid and hematopoietic tissues in mice and rats55, and T-2 toxin increases expression of both oxidative stress-related genes and apoptosis-related genes (c-fos and c-jun), resulting in the induction of hepatocyte apoptosis in mice4. Moreover, T-2 toxin is also reported to cause oxidative stress and subsequent activation of MAPK pathways in pregnant and fetal rat tissues, resulting in the induction of apoptosis in these tissues56.

To summarize, T-2 toxin-induced dermal toxicity is considered to occur as follows. T-2 toxin causes oxidative stress, which induces a ribotoxic stress response and subsequent activation of MAPK pathways. Then, this stimulates expression of c-fos and c-jun, resulting in the induction of keratinocyte apoptosis. In addition, the keratinocytes affected primarily by ribotoxic stress release TNF-α and IL-1β, and these cytokines are also thought to be involved in the mechanisms of T-2 toxin-induced keratinocyte apoptosis.

To date, there have been no reports of T-2 toxin-induced skin tumorigenesis. In this regard, Lambert et al. reported that deoxynivalenol, one of the trichothecene mycotoxins, induces a mild diffuse squamous hyperplasia in the epidermis but shows no potential for initiation or promotion when topically applied as part of a two-stage skin tumorigenesis treatment regimen in Sencar mice57.

Citrinin (CTN)

CTN is a secondary metabolite of several fungal species belonging to the genera Penicillium, Aspergillus and Monascus. It contaminates various commodities of plant origin, cereals in particular, and is usually found together with another nephrotoxic mycotoxin, OTA58, 59. CTN triggers nephropathy and hepatotoxicity as well as renal adenoma formation in various cellular and animal models60,61,62,63. To date, the mechanisms of CTN-induced in vivo toxicity have not fully been understood58, although several studies have shown the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in CTN-mediated toxicity characterized by apoptosis in certain in vitro models64,65,66,67,68.

Kumar et al. were the first to investigate molecular mechanisms of CTN-induced dermal toxicity from the viewpoints of oxidative stress, DNA damage, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis in mouse skin12. They showed that CTN under in vivo condition has the ability to cause oxidative stress, which is indicated by significant depletion of glutathione (GSH) as well as inhibition of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and catalase activities, along with an increase in LPOs and protein carbonyl content, and subsequent ROS-mediated DNA damage as evaluated by the comet assay in mouse skin upon topical exposure to CTN (25–100 μg/mouse for 12–72 h)12, as reported in the above-mentioned in vitro studies64,65,66,67,68.

ROS-mediated DNA damage in mouse skin leads to enhanced expression of p53 and p21waf1 that causes cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 and G2/M phases12 as reported by Abbas and Dutta in in vitro models69, to enhanced Bax/Bcl2 ratio and cytochrome c release, and to activated caspase 9 and 3 but not caspase 8, which result in apoptosis through the mitochondria-mediated pathway12. The p53 protein plays a key role in the DNA damage response pathway by transmitting a variety of stress signals associated with antiproliferative cellular responses that lead to apoptosis70, and the lack of enhancement in caspase 8 activity indicates that the extrinsic or death receptor pathway of apoptosis is not activated by CTN in mouse skin. Moreover, Kumar et al. clarified that topical treatment of bio-antioxidants such as butylated hydroxyanisole, quercetin and α-tocopherol abolishes CTN-induced oxidative stress, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, confirming the direct involvement of ROS in CTN-induced toxicological manifestations in mouse skin12.

To summarize, CTN under in vivo conditions has the ability to cause oxidative stress and ROS-mediated DNA damage in mouse skin upon topical exposure, leading to enhanced expression of p53, p21waf1 and BAX proteins that causes cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 and G2/M phases and apoptosis in mouse keratinocytes through the mitochondria-mediated pathway.

To date, there have been no reports of CTN-induced skin tumorigenesis. However, as mentioned above, CTN treatment causes prominent DNA damage, suggesting its genotoxic and mutagenic potential in the skin12. Moreover, although the cell cycle arrest by CTN may permit DNA repair, if it is faulty, it may allow proliferation of mutated cells, which is generally observed in cases of tumorigenesis71.

Patulin (PAT)

PAT is a toxic chemical concomitantly produced by several species of mold, especially within Aspergillus, Penicillium and Byssochlamys. It is the most common mycotoxin found in apples and apple-derived products such as juice, cider, compotes and other food intended for young children. Exposure to this mycotoxin is associated with immunological, neurological and gastrointestinal outcome72, and PAT has been classified as a group-3 carcinogen73. To date, studies on the mechanisms of PAT-induced toxicity have been done using various cell lines, focusing on the immunotoxic and genotoxic effects of the toxin72, and it has been reported that PAT has the potential for inducing formation of ROS74, 75, DNA damage64, 76, 77, rapid activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/278 or of p38 and JNK79, and effects on cell cycle distribution responsible for overexpression of a functional p53 protein80.

Saxena et al. were the first to study the mechanisms of PAT-induced dermal toxicity in mice26, and they reported that dermal exposure of PAT in mice for 4 h results in a dose-dependent (40–160 μg/animal) and time-dependent (up to 6 h) enhancement of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity and increase in biosynthesis of polyamines26. Polyamines, cell proliferation, and apoptosis are tightly connected in a quite complex interplay81, and polyamine levels within cells are regulated and modulated by the key enzymes that control polyamine biosynthesis, particularly ODC82, 83. Elevated ODC activity and increased biosynthesis of polyamines serve as a novel stimulus to induce the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-DNA damage signaling pathway and cell death in normal keratinocytes84. Wei et al. revealed the correlation of elevated ODC activity with apoptotic cell death in normal keratinocytes via the induced generation of reactive aldehydes and H2O2, followed by subsequent activation of the ATM-DNA damage response pathway84. Saxena et al. also reported that topical application of PAT (160 μg/mouse) for 24–72 h causes DNA damage depicted by alkaline comet assay and significant G1- and S-phase arrest along with induction of apoptosis in skin cells26. Moreover, they showed that PAT leads to overexpression of p21waf1, Bax and p53 proteins and that PAT-induced apoptosis is mediated through the mitochondrial intrinsic pathway as revealed through the release of cytochrome c protein in cytosol, leading to enhancement of caspase 3 activity in mouse skin cells26. Thus, the PAT (160 μg/mouse)-induced cascade of events in mouse skin is considered to occur as follows. Induction of ODC activity generates polyamines and H2O2, which cause DNA damage, resulting in enhancement of p53 expression and subsequent cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 and S phases through enhanced p21 expression along with induction of apoptosis through enhanced BAX expression and caspase 3 activity.

After that, Saxena et al. also reported that a single topical application of PAT (400 nmol/mouse) resulted in enhanced cell proliferation as evaluated by 3H-thymidine uptake along with increased generation of ROS and activation of ERK, p38 and JNK MAPKs, in mouse skin27. PAT exposure also results in activation of downstream target proteins, c-fos, c-jun and NF-κB transcription factors. They thought that the observed early activation of JNK and NF-κB appears to be a direct response to PAT, while later activation of ERK, p38, c-jun, c-fos and NF-κB may be due to enhanced generation of ROS as reported by Benhar et al.85. This suggests that PAT-induced ROS acts as second messengers in intracellular signaling cascades and may mediate cell proliferation by activating ERK and p38 along with activation of downstream targets, c-jun, c-fos and NF-κB85. Moreover, Saxena et al. reported that specific inhibitors of MAPK, especially p38 and JNK, pathways are able to significantly suppress 3H-thymidine uptake by keratinocytes in mouse skin following a single topical application of PAT (400 nmol/mouse), suggesting that p38 and JNK pathways may be involved in PAT-induced cell proliferation27. In addition, as mentioned above, PAT enhances the activity of ODC in mouse skin following a single application26. It is well known that ODC plays an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation, and it is stressed that ODC-related hyperproliferation and altered differentiation in skin keratinocytes have been linked with deregulation of MAPK signaling pathways86, 87.

To summarize, a single topical application of PAT (160 μg/mouse in the former case and 400 nmol/mouse in the latter case) to mouse skin brings about different events in mouse keratinocytes. Namely, in the former case, induction of ODC activity generates ROS, which causes DNA damage in keratinocytes, resulting in p53-mediated cell cycle arrest along with apoptosis through the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway. In the latter case, ROS generation activates MAPKs signaling pathway leading to transcriptional activation of downstream target proteins c-fos, c-jun and transcription factor NFκB, resulting in keratinocyte proliferation.

Regarding PAT-related skin tumorigenesis, Saxena et al. have shown that a single topical application of PAT (400 nmol/mouse) followed by twice weekly application of 12-tetradecanoyl phorbol myristate acetate (TPA) results in tumor formation (squamouse cell carcinoma) after 14 weeks27. In this PAT/TPA group, a significant increase in LPO activity and significant decreases in free sulfhydryls, catalase, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione reductase (GR) activities are observed. The DNA damaging ability of PAT in skin cells is in agreement with other in vitro findings in which PAT was shown to cause oxidative DNA damage in a few mammalian cells26, 64, 77, 88. On the other hand, Saxena et al. described that no tumors were observed when PAT was used either as a complete carcinogen (80 nmol) or as a tumor promoter (20 nmol) (single dose of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) followed by twice weekly application of PAT) for 25 weeks27. However, it may be possible that prolonged exposure to PAT at a high dose may induce tumor promotion and cause further toxicological manifestations in the skin, since earlier reports have revealed that long-term exposure to PAT is tumorigenic in Wistar rats, leading to sarcoma at the injection site on subcutaneous administration89, and causes benign tumors of the forestomach and glandular stomach in Sprague-Dawley rats after gavage treatment90.

To summarize, PAT (400 nmol/mouse) clearly has a tumor-initiating ability in mouse skin through skin cell proliferation mediated by ROS-induced MAPKs signaling pathway leading to transcriptional activation of downstream target proteins, c-fos and c-jun and transcription factor NF-κB. Moreover, PAT may probably have skin tumorigenic potential as a promoter and/or a complete carcinogen in mouse skin after long-term and higher-dose application.

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)

Aflatoxins are secondary metabolites of the molds Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, A. tamari and A. nominus91. AFB1 is by far the most potent teratogen, mutagen and hepatocarcinogen of all aflatoxins92. The carcinogenic potential of AFB1 following oral administration has been shown in several animal species93, while limited knowledge is available regarding the epidermal carcinogenesis of AFB1, and therefore, the WHO has clearly highlighted the need for toxicological evaluation of aflatoxins through dermal exposure94. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that glutathione-S-transferase (GST) plays a crucial role in modulation of AFB1-DNA adduct formation95, and AFB1 is said to mediate oxidative damage through generation of ROS including the hydroxyl ion96. In addition, in vitro studies have also shown that AFB1 can stimulate the release of free radicals, which leads to chromosomal damage97.

Rastogi et al. were the first to study the skin tumorigenic potential of AFB1 using a two-stage mouse skin tumor protocol15. In their study, skin topical application of AFB1 (80 nmol) as a tumor initiator, followed by twice weekly application of TPA (4 nmol) for up to 24 weeks, resulted in tumor formation (squamous cell carcinoma) after 13 weeks, but no skin tumorigenic potential was observed when AFB1 was used either as a complete carcinogen (16 nmol) or as a tumor promoter (4 nmol)15. They also showed that weekly topical application of AFB1 causes significant induction of cutaneous CYP1A monooxygenases without any effect on hepatic levels, while GST activity, which detoxifies a number of LPO products, is induced more in the liver than skin; they further showed that topical application of AFB1 also results in increased hepatic and cutaneous LPO with concomitant depletion of GSH content, indicating the induction of oxidative damage15.

Later, Rastogi et al.98 reported the protective effect of an alcoholic extract of the leaves of Ocimum sanctum on AFB1- and AFB1/TPA-induced skin tumorigenicity using the same experimental system used in their previous study15. O. sanctum is a well-known medical plant widely distributed throughout India99, and the aqueous and alcoholic extracts from the leaves of this plant have been shown to possess antioxidant, anticarcinogenic, hepatoprotective, and radioprotective properties100,101,102. The skin of AFB1/TPA-treated animals demonstrated papillomatous growth comprising of proliferation of squamous cells, hyperkeratinization and keratin pearl formation while the skin of animals topically pretreated with O. sanctum leaf extract showed small papillomatous growth lacking pearl formation. In addition, pretreatment with O. sanctum leaf extract significantly decreased the number of skin tumors induced by AFB1/TPA.

The expression of cutaneous γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and glutathione-S-transferase-P (GST-P) protein increased after AFB1 or AFB1/TPA treatment, but pretreatment with O. sanctum leaf extract led to a reduction in the expression of these proteins98. GGT is considered to be a late marker of tumor progression, and its overexpression in hepatic and skin tumors has been well documented103; GST-P expression is also said to increase in chemically induced hepatic tumors104. Pretreatment with O. sanctum leaf extract led to the reduction of cutaneous phase I enzymes that had been elevated by AFB1 or AFB1/TPA treatment and to the elevation of cutaneous phase II enzymes, suggesting the possibility of impairment in reactive metabolites formation resulting in a reduction of skin carcinogenicity98. Moreover, pretreatment with O. sanctum leaf extract increased the cutaneous GSH level and reduced cutaneous LPO levels that had been elevated by AFB1 or AFB1/TPA treatment98. Enhanced levels of GSH resulting from treatment with O. sanctum leaf extract may reduce the rate of LPO as well as decrease the expression of heat shock protein (HSP) 70 protein, which has been reported to be altered during carcinogenesis105. Since HSP70 is also involved in oxidative stress106, it is quite likely that this protein may have a role in cancer, which is also associated with oxidative stress and inflammation107, 108. Thus, Rastogi et al. concluded that leaf extract of O. sanctum provides protection against AFB1/TPA-induced skin carcinogenesis by acting as an antioxidant, by modulating phase I and II enzymes and/or by exhibiting antiproliferative activity98.

To summarize, it is considered that AFB1 acts as a skin tumor initiator through reactive metabolite formation, LPO-mediated oxidative stress, and GST-mediated AFB1-DNA adduct formation. Like in the case of PAT, AFB1 may also have skin tumorigenic potential as a promoter and/or a complete carcinogen in mouse skin after long-term and higher-dose application.

Ochratoxin A (OTA)

OTA is a fungal metabolite produced by Aspergillus ochraceus and Penicillium verrucosum. OTA is found in a variety of plant food products such as cereals. Because of its long half-life, it accumulates in the food chain109, 110 and is frequently detected in the human plasma at nanomolar concentrations111. The main target organ for OTA toxicity is the kidney112, 113, and OTA also has immunotoxic114, teratogenic115, genotoxic116 and neurotoxic effects117. In addition, there is sufficient evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of OTA112, although there is still insufficient evidence in humans.

Kumar et al. were the first to investigate the OTA-induced toxicity and tumorigenesis in mouse skin29. In their study, after a single topical application of OTA (20–80 μg/mouse for 12–72 h), significant DNA damage as assessed by alkaline comet assay along with an elevated γ-H2AX level, a sensitive marker of DNA damage, was detected in mouse skin29. In addition, the level of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (Nrf2), the master regulator for maintaining the balance of ROS118, in the nucleus decreased after 24 h of OTA exposure, indicating an inhibitory effect of OTA on Nrf2 signaling. OTA-induced Nrf2 suppression may cause significant depletion of GSH content as well as inhibition of the activities of catalase, GST and GR along with enhanced production of LPOs and protein carbonyls dose- and time-dependently, and this indicates increased generation of ROS and subsequently enhanced oxidative stress in mouse skin.

Kumar et al. also reported that OTA activates ERK1/2 in the early phase and then p38 and JNK in the later phase in mouse skin after topical exposure29, and they suggested that the early activation of ERK1/2 is the result of a direct response to OTA but that later activation of p38 and JNK may be the result of OTA-induced ROS, which acts as secondary messengers in the intracellular signaling cascade in mouse skin85. Moreover, they reported that exposure to OTA results in a significant increase in the proportion of cells in the G0/G1 phase with a concomitant decrease in S phase cells, followed by an increase in apoptosis through elevated expression of p53 and p21waf1, enhancement of the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and cytochrome c level, and increased activities of caspase 9 and 3 in mouse skin29. On the other hand, Kumar et al. reported that a single topical application of OTA (100 nmol/mouse) causes significant enhancement of short-term markers of skin tumor promotion such as ODC activity, DNA synthesis and hyperplasia as well as expression of cyclin-G1 and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in mouse skin28. The enhancement in ODC activity has been reported to occur in response to growth factors as well as promoters such as TPA119, and the overexpression of cyclin-D1 and COX-2 proteins is said to play a role in cell proliferation and tumor promotion of various tissues including skin120, 121.

To summarize, a single topical exposure of OTA at the dose level of 20–80 μg/mouse activates ERK1/2 directly and p38 and JNK through OTA-induced ROS, resulting in the induction of apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway in mouse skin. On the other hand, a single topical exposure of OTA at a dose level of 100 nmol/mouse causes significant enhancement of short-term markers of skin tumor promotion in mouse skin.

In a two-stage mouse skin tumorigenesis protocol, Kumar et al. reported that a a single topical application of OTA (80 μg/mouse) followed by twice weekly application of TPA for 24 weeks leads to tumor formation (squamous carcinoma with proliferation of epidermal layers)29. They suggested that some cells damaged by a single topical application of OTA may pass though a p53-mediated cell cycle checkpoint by faulty repair, which may introduce mutations in OTA-induced animals, and subsequent application of TPA, a tumor promoter, fixes the mutations and confers a selective advantage in those cells, which leads to tumorigenesis29. They concluded that OTA has skin tumor-initiating properties under in vivo conditions, which may be related to oxidative stress, MAPK signaling and DNA damage in mouse skin29.

Kumar et al. also reported that a single topical application of DMBA (120 nmol/mouse) followed by twice weekly application of OTA (50 nmol/mouse) for 24 weeks leads to tumor formation in mouse skin (squamous carcinoma with proliferation of epidermal layers), indicating the skin tumor promoting activity of OTA28. Moreover, based on the results of in vitro study using primary murine keratinocytes exposed to a noncytotoxic dose of OTA (5.0 μM), they proposed that OTA-induced cell proliferation seems to be responsible for skin tumor promotion by activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), MAPKs and Akt signaling involving NF-κB, AP-1 transcription factors, cyclin-D1 and COX-2 genes28. EGFR signaling leads to enhancement of phosphorylation of MAPKs as well as the activity of AP-1 and transcription factors and utilizes MAPK pathways to mediate its growth and stimulative effects122, and MAPKs are said to play a crucial role in skin tumorigenesis123,124,125. EGFR also acts through the Akt pathway, which plays a role in tumor promotion and progression126. The transcription factor AP-1 mediates gene regulation in response to a variety of extracellular stimuli including growth factors, cytokines, oncogenes, tumor promoters and chemical carcinogens127, and upon activation, both transcription factors NF-κB and AP-1 translocate to the nucleus, where they bind to promoter regions of various target genes including cyclin-D1 and COX-2128.

To summarize, OTA has skin tumor-initiating properties that may be related to oxidative stress, MAPK signaling and DNA damage, and OTA also has skin tumor-promoting properties that involve EGFR-mediated MAPKs and Akt pathways along with NF-κB and AP-1 transcription factors. Cyclin-D1 and COX-2 are target genes responsible for the tumor-promoting activity of OTA.

Conclusions

This paper reviewed the mechanisms of dermal toxicity and/or tumorigenesis induced in rodents by T-2 toxin, CTN, PAT, AFB1 and OTA.

(1) The T-2 toxin-induced cascade of events in rat skin is considered as follows. T-2 toxin brings about oxidative stress, which induces a ribotoxic stress response and subsequent activation of MAPK pathways. Then, this stimulates expression of c-fos and c-jun, resulting in keratinocyte apoptosis. In addition, TNF-α and IL-1β, which are released from keratinocytes primarily affected by ribotoxic stress, are also involved in T-2 toxin-induced keratinocyte apoptosis.

(2) CTN has the ability to cause oxidative stress and ROS-mediated DNA damage in mouse skin upon topical exposure, leading to enhanced expression of p53, p21waf1 and Bax proteins that causes cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 as well as G2/M phases and apoptosis in mouse keratinocytes through the mitochondria-mediated pathway.

(3) PAT (160 μg) has a potential to induce DNA damage leading to p53-mediated cell cycle arrest along with apoptosis through the mitochondria-mediated pathway in mouse skin that may also be correlated with enhanced polyamine production as shown by induction of ODC activity. On the other hand, topical application of PAT (400 nmol) to mice results in cell proliferation, which is mediated by ROS-induced MAPKs signaling pathway leading to transcriptional activation of downstream target proteins c-fos, c-jun and transcription factor NFκB, and this is related to the skin tumor-initiating ability of PAT.

(4) AFB1 acts as a skin tumor initiator through reactive metabolite formation, LPO-mediated oxidative stress, and GST-mediated AFB1-DNA adduct formation. AFB1 may also have skin tumorigenic potential as a promoter and/or a complete carcinogen in mouse skin after long-term and higher-dose application.

(5) OTA has skin tumor-initiating properties that may be related to oxidative stress, MAPKs signaling and DNA damage in mouse skin. OTA also has skin tumor-promoting properties that involve EGFR-mediated MAPKs and Akt pathways along with NF-κB and AP-1 transcription factors. Cyclin D1 and COX-2 are the target genes responsible for the tumor-promoting activity of OTA.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our thanks to Dr. Stella Maris Albarenque (National University of Ireland, Republic of Ireland), Dr. Shinya Sehata (Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Japan), Dr. Junko Shinozuka (Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Japan), and Dr. Amnart Poapolathep (Kasetsart National University, Thailand) for their research efforts during their student days at the Laboratory of Veterinary Pathology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, the University of Tokyo. We also thank Mr. Pete Aughton (D. A. B. T., ITR Laboratories Canada Inc., Canada) for proofreading.

Footnotes

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/>.

References

  • 1.Haschek WM, Voss KA, and Beasley VR. Selected mycotoxins affecting animal and human health. In: Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology, 2nd ed. WM Haschek, CG Rousseaux, and MA Walling (eds). Academic Press, San Diego. 645–699. 2002 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chandra J, and Samali A. Triggering and modulation of apoptosis by oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 29: 323–333 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sehata S, Kiyosawa N, Makino T, Atsumi F, Ito K, Yamoto T, Teranishi M, Baba Y, Uetsuka K, Nakayama H, and Doi K. Morphological and microarray analysis of T-2 toxin-induced rat fetal brain lesion. Food Chem Toxicol. 42: 1727–1736 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shinozuka J, Miwa S, Fujimura H, Toriumi W, and Doi K. Hepatotoxicity of T-2 toxin, trichothecene mycotoxin. In: New Strategies for Mycotoxin Research in Asia (Proceedings of ISMYCO Bangkok ’06). S Kumagai (ed). Japanese Association of Mycotoxicology, Tokyo. 62–66. 2007
  • 5.Doi K, Ishigami N, and Sehata S. T-2 toxin-induced toxicity in pregnant mice and rats. Int J Mol Sci. 9: 2146–2158 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Surai PF, Mezes M, Melnichuk SD, and Fotina TI. Mycotoxins and animal health: From oxidative stress to gene expression. Krmiva. 50: 35–43 2008 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Doi K, and Uetsuka K. Mechanisms of mycotoxin-induced neurotoxicity through oxidative stress-associated pathways. Int J Mol Sci. 12: 5213–5237 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.FAO. Manuals of Food Quality Control. 10. Training in Mycotoxin Analysis. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 4–10. 1990 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.WHO. Safety Evaluation of Certain Mycotoxins in Food Prepared by 49th meeting of JECFA Food Additives Series 47. WHO, Geneva. 1998
  • 10.Albarenque SM, Shinozuka J, Iwamoto S, Nakayama H, and Doi K. T-2 toxin-induced acute skin lesions in Wistar-derived hypotrichotic WBN/ILA-Ht rats. Histol Histopathol. 14: 337–342 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bennett JW, and Klich M. Mycotoxins. Clin Microbiol Rev. 16: 497–516 2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kumar R, Dwivedi PD, Dhawan A, Das M, and Ansari KM. Citrinin-generated reactive oxygen species cause cell cycle arrest leading to apoptosis via the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway in mouse skin. Toxicol Sci. 122: 557–566 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Riley RT, Kemppainen BW, and Norred WP. Penetration of aflatoxins through isolated human epidermis. J Toxicol Environ Health. 15: 769–777 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kemppainen BW, Riley RT, and Pace JG. Skin absorption as a route of exposure for aflatoxin and trichothecenes. J Toxicol. 7: 95–120 1988 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rastogi S, Dogra RKS, Khanna SK, and Das M. Skin tumorigenic potential of afratoxin B1 in mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 44: 670–677 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bunner BL. Wannemacher RWJr, Dinterman RE, and Broski FH. Cutaneous absorption and decontamination of [3H] T-2 toxin in the rat model. J Toxicol Environment Health. 26: 413–423 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Blaylock BL, Kouchi Y, Comment CE, Pollock PL, and Luster MI. Topical application of T-2 toxin inhibits the contact hypersensitivity response in BALB/c mice. J Immunol. 150: 5135–5143 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chaudhary M, and Rao PV. Brain oxidative stress after dermal and subcutaneous exposure of T-2 toxin in mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 48: 3436–3442 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boonen J, Malysheva SV, Taevernier L, Diana Di Mavungu J, De Saeger S, and De Spiegeleer B. Human skin penetration of selected mycotoxins. Toxicology. 301: 21–32 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schiefer HB, and Hancock DS. Systemic effects of topical application of T-2 toxin in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 76: 464–472 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pang VF, Swanson SP, Beasley VR, Buck WB, and Hascheck WM. The toxicity of T-2 toxin in swine following topical application. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 9: 41–49 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yarom R, Bergmann F, and Yagen B. Cutaneous injury by topical T-2 toxin: involvement of microvessels and mast cells. Toxicon. 25: 167–174 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bhavanishankar TN, Ramesh SH, and Shantha T. Dermal toxicity of Fusarium toxins in combinations. Arch Toxicol. 61: 241–244 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Biehl ML, Lambert RJ, Haschek WM, Buck WB, and Schaeffer DJ. Evaluation of a superactivated charcoal paste and detergent and water in prevention of T-2 toxin-induced local cutaneous effects in topically exposed swine. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 13: 523–532 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hemmati AA, Kalantari H, Jalali A, Rezai S, and Zadeh HH. Healing effect of quince seed mucilage on T-2 toxin-induced dermal toxicity in rabbit. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 64: 181–186 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Saxena N, Ansari KM, Kumar R, Dhawan A, Dwivedi PD, and Das M. Patulin causes DNA damage leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through modulation of Bax, p53 and p21/WAF1 proteins in skin of mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 234: 192–201 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Saxena N, Ansari M, Kumar R, Chaudhari BP, Dwivedi PD, and Das M. Role of mitogen activated protein kinases in skin tumorigenicity of Patrin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 257: 264–271 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kumar R, Alam S, Chaudhari BP, Dwivedi PD, Jain SK, Ansari KM, and Das M. Ochratoxin A-induced cell proliferation and tumor promotion in mouse skin by activating the expression of cyclin-D1 and cyclooxygenase-2 through nuclear factor-kappaB and activator protein-1. Carcinogenesis. 34: 647–657 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kumar R, Ansari KM, Chaudhari BP, Dhawan A, Dwivedi PD, Jain SK, and Das M. Topical application of ochratoxin A causes DNA damage and tumor initiation in mouse skin. PLoS One. 7(10): e47280 2012; published online; DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047280 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Desjardins AE, Hohn TM, and McComic SP. Trichothecene biosynthesis in Fusarium species: chemistry, genetics, and significance. Microbiol Rev. 57: 595–604 1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nelson PE, Dignani MC, and Anaissie EJ. Toxonomy, biology, and clinical aspects of Fusarium species. Clin Microbiol Rev. 7: 479–504 1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eriksen GS, and Petterson H. Toxicological evaluation of trichothrcenes in animal feed. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 114: 205–239 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shifrin VI, and Anderson P. Trichothecene mycotoxins trigger a ribotoxic stress response that activates c-jun N-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and induces apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 274: 13985–13992 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thompson WL, and Wannemacher RWH, Jr . In vitro effects of T-2 mycotoxin on synthesis of protein and DNA in rat tissues. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 105: 483–491 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chang IM, and Mar WC. Effect of T-2 toxin on lipid peroxidation in rats: Evaluation of conjugated dien formation. Toxicol Lett. 40: 275–280 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sundstol Eriksen G, Petterson H, and Lund H. Comparative cytotoxicity of deoxynivalenol, nivalenol, triacetylated derivatives and de-epoxy metabolites. Food Chem Toxicol. 42: 619–624 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Iwamoto S, Nakayama H, and Doi K. Morphological and morphometrical study on the dorsal skin of Wistar and WBN/ILA-Ht rats in their developing stage. Evaluation of the proliferation and apoptotic processes. Histol Histopathol. 13: 981–988 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Malcotti V, Yasoshima A, Imaoka K, Nakayama H, and Doi K. Dorsal skin responses to subchronic ultraviolet B (UVB)-irradiation in Wistar-derived hypotrichotic WBN/ILA-Ht rats. Histol Histopathol. 17: 683–690 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Albarenque SM, Suzuki K, Nakayama H, and Doi K. Kinetics of cytokines mRNAs expression in the dorsal skin of WBN/ILA-Ht rats following topical application of T-2 toxin. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 53: 271–274 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Albarenque SM, Suzuki K, Shinozuka J, Nakayama H, and Doi K. Kinetics of apoptosis-related mRNA expression in the dotsal skin of hypotrichotic WBN/ILA-Ht rats after topical application of T-2 toxin. Exp Toxic Pathol. 52: 553–556 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Albarenque SM, Shinozuka J, Suzuki K, Nakayama H, and Doi K. Kinetics and distribution of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 mRNA in the dorsal skin of hypotrichotic WBN/ILA-Ht rats following topical application of T-2 toxin. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 52: 297–301 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Albarenque SM, and Doi K. T-2 toxin-induced apoptosis in rat keratinocyte primary cultures. Exp Mol Pathol. 78: 144–149 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mils V, Piette J, Barette C, Veyrune J, Tesniere A, Escot C, Guilhou J, and Basset-Seguin N. The proto-oncogene c-fos increases the sensitivity of keratinocytes to apoptosis. Oncogene. 14: 1555–1561 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Collotta F, Polentarutti N, Sironi M, and Mantovani A. Expression and involvement of c-fos and c-jun proto-oncogenes in programmed cell death induced by growth factor deprivation in lymphoid cell lines. J Biol Chem. 267: 18278–18283 1992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Smeyne RJ, Vendrell M, Hayward M, Baker S, Miao G, Schiling K, Robertson L, Curran T, and Morgan J. Continuous c-fos expression precedes programmed cell death in vivo. Nature. 363: 166–169 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Barker JN, Mitra R, and Griffiths C. Keratinocytes as indicators of inflammation. Lancet. 337: 211–214 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nickoloff BJ, and Naidu Y. Perturbation of epidermal barrier function correlates with inhibition of cytokine cascade in human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 30: 535–546 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Köck A, Urbanski A, and Luger T. mRNA expression and release of tumor necrosis factor-alpha by human epidermal cells. J Invest Dermatol. 92: 462A 1989. (Abstract) . [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schwarz A, Bhardwaj R, Aragane Y, Manhnke K, Riemann K, Metze D, Luger T, and Schwarz T. Ultraviolet B-induced apoptosis of keratinocytes: evidence for partial involvement of tumor necrosis factor-α in the formation of sunburn cells. J Invest Dermatol. 104: 922–927 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Meng X, Sawamura D, Baba T, Ina S, Itai K, Hanada K, and Hashimoto I. TNF-α causes apoptosis in epidermal keratinocytes after subcutaneous injection of TNF-α plasmid. J Invest Dermatol. 113: 856–857 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhuang L, Wang B, Shinder G, Shivji G, Marl T, and Sander D. TNF receptor p55 plays a pivotal role in murine keratinocyte apoptosis induced by ultraviolet B irradiation. J Immunol. 162: 1440–1447 1999. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fowlis DJ, Flanders K, Duffie D, Balmain A, and Akhurst R. Discordant transforming growth factor β1 RNA and protein localization during chemical carcinogenesis of the skin. Cell Growth Differ. 3: 81–91 1992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Benassi L, Ottani D, Fabrizio F, Marconi A, Chiodino C, Giannetti A, and Pincelli C. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3, transforminf growth factor-β1, calcium, and ultraviolet B radiation induce apoptosis in cultured human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 109: 276–282 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Iordanov MS, Pribnow D, Magun J, Din T, Pearson J, and Magun B. Ultraviolet radiation triggers the ribotoxic stress response in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 273: 15794–15803 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shinozuka J, Tsutsui S, Ishigami N, Ueno-Yamanouchi A, Nakayama H, and Doi K. Development of apoptosis and changes in apoptosis-related genes expression in the mouse thymus following T-2 toxin-inoculation. J Toxicol Pathol. 12: 77–81 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sehata S, Kiyosawa N, Atsumi F, Ito K, Yamoto T, Teranishi M, Uetsuka K, Nakayama H, and Doi K. Microarray analysis of T-2 toxin-induced liver, placenta and fetal liver lesions in pregnant rats. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 57: 15–28 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lambert LA, Hines FA, and Eppley RM. Lack of initiation and promotion potential of deoxynivalenol for skin tumorigenesis in Sencer mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 33: 217–222 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Flajs D, and Peracia M. Toxicological properties of citrinin. Arh. Hig Rada Toksikol. 60: 457–464 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.CAST. Mycotoxins: Risks in Plant, Animal, and Human Systems. Council of Agricultural Science and Technology. Task force report No. 139. CAST, Ames. 2003 [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Carlton WW, and Tuite J. Metabolites of P. viridicatum toxicology. In: Mycotoxins in Human and Animal Health. JV Rodricks, CW Hesseltine, and MA Mehlman (eds). Pathotox Publications Inc., Illinoi. 525–555. 1977 [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Aleo MD, Wyatt RD, and Schnellmann RG. Mitochondrial dysfunction in an early event in ochratoxin A but not oosporein toxicity to rat renal proximal tubules. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 107: 73–80 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Arai M, and Hibino T. Tumorigenicity of citrinin in male F344 rats. Cancer Lett. 17: 281–287 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kitabatake N, Doi E, and Trivedi AB. Toxicity evaluation of the mycotoxins, citrinin and ochratoxin A, using several animal cell lines. Comp Biochem Physiol C. 105: 429–433 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu BH, Yu FY, Wu TS, Li SY, Su MC, Wang MC, and Shi SM. Evaluation of genotoxic risk and oxidative DNA damage in mammalian cells exposed to mycotoxins, patulin and citrinin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 191: 255–263 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yu FY, Liao YC, Chang CH, and Liu BH. Citrinin induces apoptosis in HL-60 cells via activation of the mitochondrial pathway. Toxicol Lett. 161: 143–151 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chan WH. Citrinin induces apoptosis via a mitochondria-dependent pathway and inhibition of survival signals in embryonic stem cells, and causes developmental injury in blastocysts. Biochem J. 404: 317–326 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chan WH. Citrinin induces apoptosis in mouse embryonic stem cells. IUBMB Life. 60: 171–179 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chen CC, and Chan WH. Inhibition of citrinin-induced apoptoptotic biochemical signaling in human hepatoma G2 cells by resveratol. Int J Mol Sci. 10: 3338–3357 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Abbas T, and Dutta A. p21 in cancer: intricate networks and multiple activities. Nat Rev Cancer. 9: 400–414 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jiang L, Sheikh MS, and Huang Y. Decision making by p53: life versus death. Mol Cell Pharmacol. 2: 69–77 2010. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Das M, Ansari KM, Dhawan A, Shukla Y, and Khanna SK. Correlation of DNA damage in Epidemic Dropsy patients to carcinogenic potential of argemone oil and isolated sanguinarine alkaloid in mice. Int J Cancer. 117: 709–717 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Puel O, Galtier P, and Oswald IP. Biosynthesis and toxicological effects of patulin. Toxins. 2: 613–631 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.IARC. Some naturally occurring and synthetic food components, furocoumarins and ultraviolet radiation. In: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans. IARC, Lyon. 83–98. 1986 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Barhoumi R, and Burghardt RC. Kinetic analysis of the chronology of patulin and gossypol-induced cytotoxicity in vitro. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 30: 290–297 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Liu BH, Wu TS, Yu FY, and Su CC. Induction of oxidative stress response by the mycotoxin Patulin in mammalian cells. Toxicol Sci. 95: 340–347 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Thust R, Kneist S, and Mendel J. Patulin, a further clastogenic mycotoxin, is negative in the SCE assay in Chinese hamster V79-E cells in vitro. Mutat Res. 103: 91–97 1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Alves I, Olivria NG, Laires A, Rodrigues AS, and Rueff J. Induction of micronuclei and chromosomal aberrations by the mycotoxin patulin in mammalian cells: role of ascorbic acid as modulator of patulin clastogenicity. Mutagenesis. 15: 229–234 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wu TS, Yu FY, Su CC, Kan JC, Chung CP, and Liu BH. Activation of ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase in human cells by the mycotoxin patulin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 207: 103–111 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Liu BH, Wu TS, Yu FY, and Wang H. Mycotoxin patulin activates the p38 kinase and JNK signaling pathways in human embryonic kidney cells. Toxicol Sci. 89: 423–430 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lehman L, Franz U, and Metzler M. Genotoxic potential of the mycotoxin patulin in cultured mammalial fibroblasts. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol. 367: R166 2003 [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tantini B, Fiumana E, Cetrullo S, Pignatti C, Bonavita F, Shantz LM, Giordano E, Muscari C, Flamigni F, Guarnieri C, Stefanelli C, and Caldarera CM. Involvement of polyamines in apoptosis of cardiac myoblasts in a model of stimulated ischemia. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 40: 775–782 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Thomas T, and Thomas TJ. Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Cell Mol Life Sci. 58: 244–258 2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wallace HM, Fraser AV, and Hughes A. A perspective of polyamine metabolism. Biochem J. 376: 1–14 2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wei G, Defeo K, Hayes CS, Woster PM, Nayak LM, and Gilmour SK. Elevated ornithine decarboxylase levels activate ataxia telangiectasia mutated-DNA damage signaling in normal keratinocytes. Cancer Res. 68: 2214–2222 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Benhar M, Engelberg D, and Levitzki A. ROS, stress-activated kinases and stress signaling in cancer. EMBO Rep. 3: 420–425 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chung JH, Kang S, Varani J, Lin J, Fischer GJ, and Voorhees JJ. Decreased extracellular signal regulated kinase and increased stress activated MAP kinase activities in aged human skin in vivo. J Invest Dermatol. 115: 177–182 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Takahashi H, Ibe M, Nakamura S, Ishida-Yamamoto A, Hasimoto Y, and Iizuka H. Extracellular regulated kinase and c-Jun N-terminal kinase are activated in psoriatic involved epidermis. J Dermatol Sci. 30: 94–99 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pfeiffer E, Gross K, and Metzler M. Aneuploidogenic and clastogenic potential of the mycotxins citrinin and patulin. Carcinogenesis. 19: 1313–1318 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Dickens F, and Jones HEH. Carcinogenic activity of a series of reactive lactones and related substances. Br J Cancer. 15: 85–100 1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Osswald H, Frank HK, Komitowski D, and Winter H. Long-term testing of patulin administered orally to Sprague-Dawley rats and Swiss mice. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 16: 243–247 1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Goto T, Wicklow DT, and Ito Y. Aflatoxin and cyclopiazonic acid production by a sclerotium-producing Aspergillus tamari strain. Appl Environ Microbiol. 62: 4036–4038 1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Busby W, and Wogan G. Aflatoxins. Chemical carcinogens. Am Chem Soc Monogr. 2: 954–1136 1984 [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Roebuck BD, and Maxuitenko YY. In: The toxicology of aflatoxins. In: Human health, veterinary and agricultural significance, DL E, and ID G (eds). Academic Press, San Diego. 27–44. 1994 [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Anonymous Manuals of food quality control. 10. Training in mycotoxin analysis. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1990 [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Raney KD, Coles B, Guengerich FP, and Harris TM. The endo-8,9-epoxide of aflatoxin B1: a new metabolite. Chem Res Toxicol. 5: 333–335 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Shen HM, Shi CY, Lee HP, and Ong CN. Aflatoxin B1-induced lipid peroxidation in rat liver. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 127: 145–150 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Amstad P, Levy A, Emerit I, and Certti P. Evidence for membrane-mediated chromosomal damage by aflatoxin B1 in human lymphocytes. Carcinogenesis. 5: 719–723 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Rastogi S, Shukla Y, Paul BN, Chowdhuri DK, Khanna SK, and Das M. Protective effect of Ocimum sanctum on 3-methylcholanthrene, 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene and aflatoxin B1 induced skin tumorigenesis in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 224: 228–240 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.SCIR Wealth of India: A Dictionary of Indian Raw Materials and Industrial Products. Publications and Information Directorate, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi. 1996 [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Prashar R, Kumar A, Hewer A, Cole KJ, Davis W, and Phillips DH. Inhibition by an extract of Ocimum sanctum of DNA-binding activity of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene in rat hepatocytes in vitro. Cancer Lett. 128: 155–160. 1998. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 101.Karthikeyan K, Ravichandran P, and Govindasamy S. Chemopreventive effect of Ocimum sanctum on DMBA-induced hamster buccal carcinogenesis. Oral Oncol. 35: 112–119 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Uma Devi P. Radioprotective, anticarcinogenic and antioxidant properties of the Indian holy Basil, Ocimum sanctum (Tulai). Indian J Exp Biol. 39: 185–190 2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Aldaz CM, Conti CJ, and Larcher F. Sequential development of aneuploidy precedes keratin modification and γ-glutathione transferase expression in mouse skin papillomas. Cancer Res. 48: 3253–3257 1988. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Satoh K, Kitahara A, Soma Y, Halayami S, and Sato K. Purification, reduction and distribution of placental GST: a new marker enzyme for preneoplastic cells in the rat chemical carcinogenic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 82: 3964–3968 1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ferrarini M, Heltai S, Zocchi MR, and Rugarli C. Unusual expression and localization of heat-scock proteins in human tumor cells. Int J Cancer. 51: 613–619 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Chowdhuri DK, Parmar D, Kakkar P, Shukla R, Seth PK, and Srimal RC. Antistress effects of bacosides of Bacopa monnieri: modulation of Hsp70 expression, superoxide dismutase and cytochrome p450 activity in rat brain. Phytother Res. 16: 639–645 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Cerutti PA. Peroxidant status and tumor promotion. Science. 227: 375–381 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Jang M, and Pezzuto JM. Effects of resveratrol on 12-O-tetra decanoyl phorbol-13-acetate induced oxidative events and gene expression in mouse skin. Cancer Lett. 134: 81–89 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Galtier P. Pharmacokinetics of ochratoxin A in animals. IARC Sci Pub. 187–200. 1991 [PubMed]
  • 110.Pfohl-Leszkowicz A, and Manderville RA. Ochratoxin A: An overview on toxicity and carcinogenicity in animals and humans. Mol Nutr Food Res. 51: 61–99 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Gareis M, and Wolff J. Relevance of mycotoxin contaminated feed for farm animals and carryover of mycotoxins to food of animal origin. Mycoses. 43: 79–83 2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kuiper-Goodman T, Hilts C, Billiard SM, Kiparissis Y, Richard ID, and Hayward S. Health risk assessment of ochratoxin A for all age-sex strata in a market economy. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 27: 212–240 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Krogh P. Role of ochratoxin in disease causation. Food Chem Toxicol. 30: 213–224 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lea T, Steinen K, and Stormer FC. Mechanism of ochratoxin A-induced immunosuppression. Mycopathologia. 107: 153–159 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Arora RG, Frolen H, and Fellner-Feldegg H. Inhibition of ochratoxin A teratogenesis by zearalenone and diethylstilbesteril. Food Chem Toxicol. 21: 779–783 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Pfohl-Leszkowicz A, Chakor K, Creppy EE, and Dirheimer G. DNA adduct formation in mice treated with ochratoxin A. IARC Sci Pub. 245–253. 1991 [PubMed]
  • 117.Sava V, Reunova O, Velasquez A, Harbison R, and Sanchez-Ramos J. Acute neurotoxic effects of the fungal metabolite ochratoxin A. Neurotoxicology. 27: 82–92 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kensler TW, Wakabayashi N, and Biswal S. Cell survival responses to environmental stress via Keap1-Nrf-2-ARE pathway. Ann Rev Pharmacol. 47: 89–116 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.O’Brien TG. The induction of ornithine decarboxylase as an early, possibly obligatory, event in mouse skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 36: 2644–2653 1976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Robles AI, and Conti CJ. Early overexpression of cyclin D1 protein in mouse skin carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 16: 781–786 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Hull MA. Cyclooxygenase-2: how good is it as a target for cancer chemoprevention? Eur J Cancer. 41: 1854–1863 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Dhillon AS, Hagan S, Rath O, and Kolch W. MAP kinase signaling pathways in cancer. Oncogene. 26: 3279–3290 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Marin-Kuan M, Nestler S, Verguet C, Benzencon C, Piguet D, Delatour T, Mantle P, Cavin C, and Schilter B. MAOP-ERK activation in kidney of male rats chronically fed ochratoxin A at a dose causing a significant incidence of renal carcinoma. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 224: 174–181 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.O’Brien E, and Dietrich DR. Ochratoxin A: the continuing enigma. Crit Rev Toxicol. 35: 33–60 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Rumora L, and Grubisc TZ. A journey through mitogen-activated protein kinase and Ochratoxin A interactions. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 60: 449–456 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Segrelles C, Ruiz S, Peres P, Murga C, Santos M, Budunova IV, Martinez J, Larcher F, Slaga TJ, Gutkind JS, Jorcano JL, and Paramio JM. Functional roles of Akt signaling in mouse skin tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 21: 53–64 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Karin M, Liu ZG, and Zandi E. AP-1 function and regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 9: 240–246 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Surh YJ, and Kundu JK. Signal transduction network leading to COX-2 induction: a road map in search of cancer chemoprevention. Arch Pharm Res. 28: 1–15 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Toxicologic Pathology are provided here courtesy of The Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology

RESOURCES