Abstract
Objective
To examine the relationship between violence, condom breakage and HIV prevalence among female sex workers (FSWs).
Methods
Data were obtained from the 2012 cross-sectional integrated biological and behavioural survey conducted in Benin. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to estimate the adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) of HIV infection and condom breakage in relation to violence towards FSWs. A score was created to examine the relationship between the number of violence types reported and HIV infection.
Results
Among the 981 women who provided a blood sample, HIV prevalence was 20.4%. During the last month, 17.2%, 13.5% and 33.5% of them had experienced physical, sexual and psychological violence, respectively. In addition, 15.9% reported at least one condom breakage during the previous week. There was a significant association between all types of violence and HIV prevalence. The APRs of HIV were 1.45 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.05 – 2.00), 1.42 (95%CI: 1.02 – 1.98), and 1.41 (95%CI: 1.08 – 1.41) among those who had ever experienced physical, sexual and psychological violence, respectively. HIV prevalence increased with the violence score (p=0.002, test for trend), and physical and sexual violence were independently associated with condom breakage (p values 0.010 and 0.003, respectively).
Conclusion
The results show that violence is associated with a higher HIV prevalence among FSWs and that condom breakage is a potential mediator for this association. Longitudinal studies designed to analyse this relationship and specific interventions integrated to current HIV prevention strategies are needed to reduce the burden of violence among FSWs.
Keywords: Violence, condom failure, HIV, female sex workers, sub-Saharan Africa
Introduction
The highest burden of the HIV pandemic is carried by countries in sub-Saharan Africa. In 2011, they harboured 69% of the 34 million people living with HIV infection worldwide [1]. In West Africa, where the HIV epidemic is driven by heterosexual transmission [2] female sex workers (FSWs) and their clients are disproportionally contributing to its spread to the general population at low risk [2].
Otherwise, in different parts of the world including Benin (where HIV prevalence was estimated in 2008 at 26.5% among FSWs and at 1.2% in the general population [1]), FSWs are generally stigmatized and marginalized, and due to inadequate laws, their human rights are often insufficiently protected [3, 4]. Consequently, they are frequently subject to harassment, rape and other psychological, physical and sexual violence from their regular intimate partners, their clients, their brothel owners/managers and also from the police [3, 5]. Indeed, in previous studies, it has been reported that 14.6% to 64% of FSWs were exposed to physical and sexual violence [6, 7]. Violence including sexual assault against women is a public health issue. Indeed, it is associated with poorer HIV-related and HIV-unrelated health outcomes [8]. Also, it represents a critical barrier to women’s ability to negotiate condom use and it increases the likelihood of non-condom use [9, 10]; condom slippage or breakage and the acquisition of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STI) [7, 11]. In Tanzania and Rwanda, HIV-positive women from the general population were more likely to report a history of physical, sexual or psychological violence than HIV-negative ones [12, 13] and in Uganda, intimate partner violence was associated with new HIV infections [14]. To our knowledge, only two studies conducted in India [15] and Argentina [16] have so far, investigated the association between violence and HIV infection among FSWs. In addition, neither study analysed sexual, physical and psychological violence distinctly. Furthermore, though it has been suggested that violence could cause HIV infection through inconsistent condom use [17] and condom breakage [7, 11] no study has yet formally analysed the association between violence and condom breakage. The aim of our study was to estimate the frequency of sexual, physical and psychological violence and to assess their relationship with HIV infection and condom breakage among FSWs in Benin.
Methodology
This cross-sectional study is based on data collected during the integrated biological and behavioural survey (IBBS) conducted among FSWs in Benin in 2012. Based on the most recent mapping, 386 sites were sampled with a probability proportional to size among all the known settings for commercial sex transactions (brothels, public places, hotels, nightclubs, etc.). All women aged ≥15 years in each selected site were asked to participate to the study. Overall, 1100 FSWs were contacted. A face-to-face structured questionnaire, elaborated by Family Health International and validated by the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS [18] was used to collect information on sexual behavior and on different socio-demographic characteristics including age at first paid sex, literacy, duration in sex work, number of clients/non-paying partners, and condom use during the last week (week before the interview). The number of condom breakages with all partners over the same period was also assessed. Questions related to violence were added to the structured questionnaire and the whole questionnaire was pretested before the survey. Irrespective of the perpetrators (clients, boyfriends, sites owners or managers, police or other men in uniform, colleagues (other FSWs), etc.), violence was assessed over the past 30 days. Physical violence was defined as a push/slap/beat/hurt/torture/mutilation or attack with a weapon. Sexual violence referred to forced sexual touches or forced sex and psychological violence comprised insult/mockery/threat/humiliation/harassment/contempt/deliberate privation of diverse forms of emotional support or blackmail.
After the interview, the participants were invited to provide a capillary blood sample (dried blood spots on filter paper) for HIV testing and a self-collected vaginal swab for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) testing. All these biological specimens were frozen at −20°C and transported to Cotonou (the largest city of Benin). For HIV, the tests were performed at the Central laboratory of the National AIDS Control Program (NACP) while for NG and CT they were performed at the STI laboratory of Centre de santé Cotonou-1. HIV antibody was detected by using an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Vironostika HIV mixt, Organon, Teknika, Bostel, the Netherlands) and positive sera were confirmed with a rapid and discriminatory test (Determine HIV 1/2 test, Abbott Diagnostic Division, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands). NG and CT were detected by using the Strand Displacement Amplification technique, SDA BD (Probetec ET NG/CT, Becton-Dickenson, Sparks, Maryland, USA) as instructed by the manufacturer. An external quality control was performed on all positive results and 5% of negative ones.
A ticket with a coded number was given to every participant who wished to receive the result of her HIV test. For this purpose, the participant had to go to a reference medical centre that was designated in each study locality and where HIV care was available. Information on the availability of free HIV testing throughout the country was also provided to the participants. Women reporting STI symptoms during the interview were also referred for free STI diagnosis and care according to the national guidelines.
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS institute, Inc, Cary, North Carolina, USA). To analyse the association between sexual, physical, and psychological violence and HIV infection, we used univariate and multivariate log-binomial regression models to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). After univariate analyses, all variables with a p-value <0.05 were entered in multivariate models containing the potential confounding variables described in the literature (literacy, duration of sex work, sex work typology, and number of clients and non-paying partners [15]) Then, we removed the variables with a p-value ≥0.05 unless they had a confounding effect on the association of interest. We created a combination score to see whether there was a relationship between the number of violence’s types concurrently experienced by the women and HIV infection, and we tested for linear trends (combination score as a continuous variable) by using the Wald’s chi-square. We checked for multi-colinearity in the final models.
To assess whether condom breakage could be a mediator for the association between violence and HIV infection, we conducted additional log-binomial regression models to estimate the association between a) the predictor (violence) and the potential mediator (condom breakage), and b) the mediator and the outcome (HIV) while controlling for the predictor [19].
Ethical considerations
The 2012 of an integrated biological and behavioural survey was approved by the ethics committees of the Ministry of Health of Benin and of the Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire de Québec, Québec, Canada. The objectives, procedures and potential risks related to the participation in the survey were explained to each woman and a written consent was obtained before enrolment. Consenting participants signed or apposed their fingerprint on the consent forms. The recruitment of minors aged 15 years or older was approved by the two ethics committees without consent of a parent, caretakers, guardians, or other adult, because these young people were involved in the prostitution environment and were no longer in contact with their parents or guardians. Therefore these young women were considered as an adult. Anonymity was respected at all levels of the procedure.
Results
Women general characteristics
The response rates were 92.4% for the interview and 89.2% for the provision of biological samples (capillary blood and vaginal swab). All the analyses were restricted to women who provided blood sample (n=981). Participants’ general characteristics are described in Table 1. The women were mainly from Benin and their median age was 29 years. Median duration in sex work was 5 years. Overall, 33.5%, 17.2% and 13.5% of the women reported having experienced psychological, physical and sexual violence, respectively, during the month preceding the interview. All three types of violence were mentioned by 6.3% of the participants whereas physical and sexual, physical and psychological, and sexual and psychological combinations were reported in 7.4%, 12.7% and 9.5% of them, respectively. Consistent condom use was reported by almost two-third of the women (63.6%) and HIV prevalence was 20.4%.
Table 1.
Characteristics | Number (%) or median (IQR ‡) |
---|---|
HIV-positive | |
Yes | 200 (20.4) |
No | 781 (79.6) |
Physical violence | |
Yes | 168 (17.2) |
No | 810 (82.8) |
Sexual violence | |
Yes | 132 (13.5) |
No | 846 (86.5) |
Psychological violence | |
Yes | 326 (33.5) |
No | 648 (66.5) |
Violence score† | |
0 | 578 (59.3) |
1 | 227 (23.3) |
2 | 108 (11.1) |
3 | 61 (6.3) |
Literacy | |
Illiterate | 276 (29.1) |
Literate | 672 (70.9) |
Nationality | |
Beninese | 386 (40.6) |
Ghanaian | 94 (9.9) |
Nigerian | 120 (12.6) |
Togolese | 303 (31.9) |
Others | 47 (5.0) |
Marital status | |
Married/Cohabiting | 140 (14.6) |
Single | 818 (85.4) |
Having dependents | |
Yes | 576 (59.1) |
No | 398 (40.9) |
Illicit drug use | |
Yes | 95 (9.8) |
No | 870 (90.2) |
Age in years, median (IQR) | 29 (23 – 37) |
Age at first sex (years), median (IQR) | 16 (15 – 18) |
Age at first paid sex (years), median (IQR) | 20 (18 – 27) |
Duration in sex work, (years) median (IQR) | 5 (2 – 11) |
Number of clients (last week), median (IQR) | 9 (3 – 19) |
Condom use | |
Inconsistent | 348 (36.4) |
Consistent | 609 (63.6) |
Condom breakage | |
No | 702 (84.1) |
Yes | 133 (15.9) |
Number of types of violence concurrently experienced by women;
IQR= interquartile range.
Association between physical, sexual and psychological violence and HIV infection
The three types of violence were independently associated with HIV infection. APRs were 1.45 (95%CI: 1.05 – 2.00), 1.42 (95%CI: 1.02 – 1.98) and 1.41 (95%CI: 1.08 – 1.85) for physical, sexual and psychological violence, respectively (table 2). Women concurrently exposed to all three types of violence were more likely to be HIV-positive compared to those who reported no episode of violence (APR = 1.97, 95%CI: 1.24 – 3.11) and HIV prevalence increased with the number of violence concurrently experienced by the women (adjusted p-value for trend =0.002, table 3). In all multivariate models (tables 2 and 3), HIV prevalence was lower among women who reported inconsistent condom use (p-values ≤ 0.003).
Table 2.
Variables | Physical violence | Sexual violence | Psychological violence | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
HIV + (%) | APR‡ (95% CI) | P-value | HIV + (%) | APR (95% CI*) | P-value | HIV + (%) | APR (95% CI) | P-value | |
Having experienced violence | |||||||||
No | 19.6 | 1.00 | - | 19.4 | 1.00 | - | 18.0 | 1.00 | - |
Yes | 24.4 | 1.45 (1.05–2.00) | 0.025 | 27.3 | 1.42 (1.02–1.98) | 0.037 | 25.2 | 1.41 (1.08–1.85) | 0.013 |
Sex work typology | |||||||||
Home-based | 17.4 | 1.00 | - | 17.4 | 1.00 | - | 17.4 | 1.00 | - |
Brothel-based | 26.4 | 1.81 (1.09 –3.02) | 0.023 | 26.4 | 1.72 (1.03–2.87) | 0.038 | 26.4 | 1.73 (1.03–2.88) | 0.037 |
Other | 18.4 | 1.32 (0.80–2.18) | 0.272 | 18.4 | 1.29 (0.78–2.12) | 0.321 | 18.4 | 1.30 (0.79–2.13) | 0.308 |
Duration in sex work | |||||||||
Less than two years | 19.6 | 1.00 | - | 19.6 | 1.00 | - | 19.6 | 1.00 | - |
At least two years | 21.2 | 1.67 (1.18–2.36) | 0.004 | 21.2 | 1.20 (0.80 –1.80) | 0.371 | 21.2 | 1.17 (0.78 –1.75) | 0.455 |
Literacy | |||||||||
Being literate | 18.2 | 1.00 | - | 18.2 | 1.00 | - | 18.2 | 1.00 | - |
Being illiterate | 24.6 | 1.28 (0.96 –1.69) | 0.088 | 24.6 | 1.28 (0.96–1.70) | 0.083 | 24.6 | 1.25 (0.94 –1.66) | 0.128 |
Number of clients (last week) | |||||||||
Less than 15 clients | 18.7 | 1.00 | - | 18.7 | 1.00 | - | 18.7 | 1.00 | - |
At least 15 clients | 23.9 | 0.94 (0.70–1.25) | 0.656 | 23.9 | 0.93 (0.70–1.25) | 0.630 | 23.9 | 0.94 (0.70–1.26) | 0.680 |
Regular partners (last week) | |||||||||
None | 22.6 | 1.00 | - | 22.6 | 1.00 | - | 22.6 | 1.00 | - |
At least one | 14.4 | 0.72 (0.50–1.02) | 0.065 | 14.4 | 0.75 (0.52–1.07) | 0.107 | 14.4 | 0.74 (0.52–1.05) | 0.094 |
Neisseria gonorrhoeae | |||||||||
Negative | 20.0 | 1.00 | - | 20.0 | 1.00 | - | 20.0 | 1.00 | - |
Positive | 26.2 | 1.04 (0.61–1.77) | 0.894 | 26.2 | 1.02 (0.61–1.73) | 0.928 | 26.2 | 1.05 (0.62 –1.78) | 0.860 |
Antecedent for STI | |||||||||
No | 21.2 | 1.00 | - | 21.2 | 1.00 | - | 21.2 | 1.00 | - |
Yes | 17.6 | 0.80 (0.55 –1.18) | 0.268 | 17.6 | 0.84 (0.66–1.23) | 0.371 | 17.6 | 0.83 (0.57–1.21) | 0.326 |
Condom use | |||||||||
Inconsistent | 13.5 | 1.00 | - | 13.5 | 1.00 | - | 13.5 | 1.00 | - |
Consistent | 24.6 | 1.67 (1.18–2.36) | 0.004 | 24.6 | 1.70 (1.20–2.42) | 0.003 | 24.6 | 1.69 (1.19–2.40) | 0.003 |
APR, adjusted prevalence ratio of HIV infection (mutually adjusted for all the variables listed in the table);
CI, Confidence interval.
Table 3.
Variables | HIV+ (%) | APR* (95% CI**) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Violence score† | |||
0 | 17.3 | 1.00 | - |
1 | 23.8 | 1.31 (0.95 – 1.80) | 0.102 |
2 | 22.2 | 1.44 (0.96 – 2.16) | 0.076 |
3 | 31.2 | 1.97 (1.24 – 3.12) | 0.004 |
P-value for trend | - | - | 0.002 ‡ |
Sex work typology | |||
Home-based | 17.4 | 1.00 | - |
Brothel-based | 26.4 | 1.78 (1.07 – 2.97) | 0.026 |
Other | 18.4 | 1.34 (0.82 – 2.14) | 0.244 |
Duration in sex work | |||
Less than two years | 19.6 | 1.00 | - |
At least two years | 21.2 | 1.19 (0.80 – 1.79) | 0.384 |
Literacy | |||
Being literate | 18.2 | 1.00 | - |
Being illiterate | 24.6 | 1.26 (0.95 – 1.68) | 0.108 |
Number of clients (last week) | |||
Less than 15 clients | 18.7 | 1.00 | - |
At least 15 clients | 23.9 | 0.92 (0.69 – 1.24) | 0.600 |
Regular partners (last week) | |||
None | 22.6 | 1.00 | - |
At least one | 14.4 | 0.74 (0.52 – 1.04) | 0.089 |
Neisseria gonorrhoeae | |||
Negative | 20.0 | 1.00 | - |
Positive | 26.2 | 1.06 (0.63 – 1.81) | 0.819 |
Antecedent for STI | |||
No | 21.2 | 1.00 | - |
Yes | 17.6 | 0.80 (0.55 – 1.17) | 0.254 |
Condom use | |||
Inconsistent | 13.5 | 1.00 | - |
Consistent | 24.6 | 1.73 (1.22 – 2.45) | 0.002 |
Number of types of violence concurrently experienced by women;
Wald test;
APR, adjusted prevalence ratio of HIV infection (mutually adjusted for all the variables listed in the table);
CI, confidence interval.
Association between violence and condom breakage
Overall, 15.9% of the women reported at least one condom breakage during the week before the interview. In univariate analyses, a statistically significant association was observed between the three types of violence and condom breakage (table 4). But, the associations remained significant for physical and sexual violence after adjusting for sex work typology, age at first paid sex, duration in sex work, number of clients and non-paying partners, and literacy: APR = 1.59 (95%CI: 1.12 – 2.27), and 1.72 (95%CI: 1.20 –2.47), respectively. Condom breakage prevalence increased across the categories of the violence score (types of violence concurrently experienced by women) with an adjusted p-value for trend =0.002). However, the association was statistically significant only when three concurrent types of violence were reported by the participants (p-value =0.004). Whatever the type of violence was, in the multivariate models, a higher number of clients (≥15) was associated with condom breakage (all p-values <0.0001, results not shown).
Table 4.
Type of violence | Condom breakage (%) | Univariate (unadjusted) | Multivariate (adjusted)† | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
PR* | 95%CI** | P-value | PR | 95%CI | P-value | ||
Physical | 24.0 | 1.72 | 1.22 – 2.41 | 0.002 | 1.59 | 1.12 – 2.27 | 0.010 |
Sexual | 25.9 | 1.82 | 1.27 – 2.61 | 0.001 | 1.72 | 1.20 – 2.47 | 0.003 |
Psychological | 19.3 | 1.38 | 1.01 – 1.88 | 0.041 | 1.31 | 0.94 – 1.81 | 0.105 |
Violence score‡ | |||||||
0 | 12.9 | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
1 | 16.7 | 1.29 | 0.88 – 1.88 | 0.193 | 1.24 | 0.83 – 1.85 | 0.294 |
2 | 22.6 | 1.74 | 1.12 – 2.71 | 0.013 | 1.57 | 1.00 – 2.48 | 0.054 |
3 | 27.8 | 2.15 | 1.32 – 3.49 | 0.002 | 2.04 | 1.26 – 3.33 | 0.004 |
P-value for trend¶ | - | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Adjusted for sex work typology, age at first paid sex, duration in sex work, number of clients and non-paying partners and literacy;
Number of types of violence concurrently experienced by women;
Wald test;
PR, Prevalence ratio of condom breakage (at least one versus none with any sexual partner during the last seven days);
CI, Confidence interval.
Association between condom breakage and HIV infection
As shown in table 5, HIV prevalence was slightly higher among women who experienced condom breakage than among women who did not: APR = 1.03 (95%CI: 0.69 – 1.53).
Table 5.
Variables | HIV+ (%) | APR‡ (95% CI*) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Condom breakage | |||
None | 21.51 | 1.00 | - |
At least one | 21.05 | 1.03 (0.69 – 1.53) | 0.882 |
Sex work typology | |||
Brothel-based | 17.4 | 1.00 | - |
Brothel-based | 26.4 | 1.91 (1.06 – 3.43) | 0.031 |
Other | 18.4 | 1.37 (0.77 – 2.45) | 0.283 |
Duration in sex work | |||
Less than two years | 19.6 | 1.00 | - |
At least two years | 21.2 | 1.14 (0.76 – 1.71) | 0.520 |
Literacy | |||
Being literate | 18.2 | 1.00 | - |
Being illiterate | 24.6 | 1.31 (0.98 – 1.75) | 0.067 |
Regular partners (last week) | |||
None | 22.6 | 1.00 | - |
At least one | 14.4 | 0.74 (0.51 – 1.06) | 0.104 |
Number of clients (last week) | |||
Less than 15 clients | 18.7 | 1.00 | - |
At least 15 clients | 23.9 | 0.87 (0.64 – 1.18) | 0.370 |
Condom use | |||
Inconsistent | 13.5 | 1.00 | - |
Consistent | 24.6 | 1.55 (1.06 – 2.26) | 0.024 |
Neisseria gonorrhoeae | |||
Negative | 20.0 | 1.00 | - |
Positive | 26.2 | 1.02 (0.69 – 1.73) | 0.955 |
STI history | |||
No | 21.2 | 1.00 | - |
Yes | 17.6 | 0.90 (0.62 – 1.33) | 0.607 |
APR, Adjusted prevalence ratio of HIV infection (adjusted for all the variables listed in the table);
CI, Confidence interval.
Discussion
In this study conducted in Benin, physical, sexual and psychological violence perpetrated against FSWs were relatively common and independently associated with HIV infection. In accordance with previous studies, more than one-third of the women reported at least one episode of violence during the thirty days preceding the interview [6, 7, 15]. These high rates of violence among FSWs are partly due to the criminalisation of the sex work milieu [20]. In this environment where brutality is common, FSWs become an easy target for violence [20]. Also, violence is a consequence of gender power inequality that generally confers to men the authority to control women [21]. Violence against FSWs is tolerated and under-reported to the police because some law enforcement agents are unfortunately among the perpetrators of violent acts [5]. The higher proportion of psychological violence (33.5%) is in accordance with the marginalization and the tendency of most of the people to reject FSWs [16].
All three types of violence were associated with a higher prevalence of HIV infection. These results are supported by those of two previous studies from India and Argentina in which HIV prevalence was 1.58 and 1.8-fold higher among FSWs who experienced violence compared to those who did not [15, 16]. At the general population level, different studies observed that women who reported intimate partner violence were also more likely to be infected with HIV [13, 14, 22]. Since violence per se cannot transmit HIV infection, different mechanisms that could explain the relationship between both factors have been mentioned in the literature. First, sexual coercion and forced sex could intimidate women in such a way that their enthusiasm to negotiate condom use could be inhibited [23]. Also, a past history of abuse can compromise condom negotiation due to the fear of another violent episode [16] and men who commit violent acts against women are more likely to have higher levels of risky sexual behaviour and to be infected with HIV and/or other STI [24]. Consequently, inconsistent condom use has been considered as a mediator between violence and HIV infection. However, in accordance with the results of two prospective studies [14, 22] we did not observe any evidence in favour of this hypothesis. Moreover, in our study, inconsistent condom use was associated with a lower prevalence of HIV infection. This finding, also reported in south India where HIV prevalence in women of the general population who ever used a condom was 3.3 times higher than that of those who never used a condom [25] is certainly due to reverse causality since women may start using condoms consistently after realising that they are at high risk of infection or even after becoming aware of their HIV-positive status. Similarly to two studies conducted in China and in Thailand [7, 11] we observed that physical and sexual violence were independently associated with condom breakage among FSWs. Vaginal tearing or trauma along with condom slippage or breakage resulting from forced sex can increase susceptibility to HIV infection [7, 11] Condom breakage leads to a skin to skin contact and to direct exchange of genital fluids that can facilitate HIV/STI transmission, especially if the vaginal mucosa is altered by violent sex. In our study, sexual violence was more strongly associated with condom breakage than was physical violence. This suggests that condom breakage due to sexual violence could effectively be a direct pathway for HIV acquisition while the association between physical violence and HIV infection could be bidirectional. On one hand, physical violence could precede sexual violence which entails condom breakage. Actually, among the 173 women who reported physical violence, 42.2% have concomitantly experienced sexual violence. On the other hand, being recognized as an HIV-positive person could expose a FSW to physical violence [26]. However, apart from their colleagues, their boyfriends and the sites owners or managers, there is no reason for FSWs to reveal their HIV seropositivity to their clients and to law enforcement agents. Concerning psychological violence, childhood abuse and sex work are associated with chronic or recurrent depression [27] which in turn can result in lack of condom use with clients [28] and facilitate HIV transmission. However, in our study, we investigated only recent episodes of psychological violence and, in addition, inconsistent condom use was rather a confounding factor. Therefore, we cannot reasonably exclude the possibility that being HIV-positive was the reason why some women were experiencing psychological violence. Indeed, this type of violence comprises behaviours like insults, mockeries and humuliation that can emanate from everybody (relatives and closer friends such as colleagues, boyfriends and sites owners or managers) to whom the HIV-positive status may have been disclosed. This hypothesis is partially supported by the fact that psychological violence was the more prevalent form of violence reported in our study. Over one-third of the participants (33.5%) reported it while only 17.2% and 13.5% reported physical and sexual violence, respectively. In addition, psychological violence was the only type of violence that was not independently associated with condom breakage, a likely mediator between violence and HIV infection.
However, we did not find a statistically significant association between condom breakage and HIV infection probably because condom breakage was measured over a short period of time (the week preceding the survey) that was insufficient for HIV acquisition. As shown by Gray et al [29], the probability of HIV transmission per unprotected sexual intercourse is very low (0,001) even in the presence of STI (0,004). Also, we have observed a relatively limited number of vaginal sexual acts during the last seven days (mean number = 13). Indeed, Mann et al, have found that the probability of HIV infection was only 3 % for 30 unprotected sexual intercourses [30].
To our knowledge, this study is the first to assess the relationship between physical, sexual and psychological violence and HIV infection, and to observe that HIV prevalence increases with concurrent exposure to different types of violence among FSWs in Sub-Saharan Africa. This is also the case concerning the independent association between physical/sexual violence and condom breakage, one of the potential mediators between violence in general and sexual violence in particular and HIV infection. It should be noted that the association between sexual violence and HIV infection in FSWs has already been observed in China [11]. The main limitation of the study is the cross-sectional design that did not allow us to thoroughly analyse lack of condom use as a pathway between violence and HIV infection. Also, because of a possible reverse causality effect related to the cross sectional design, being HIV-positive could have been the reason why FSWs were exposed to violence, especially psychological violence. Because of gender power imbalance that increases the social tolerance of violence against women and also because of the sensitive nature of questions related to violence, and for fear of intimidation some women might have under-reported the violence episodes they had faced, particularly if the perpetrator was the boyfriend, the brothel owner/manager or the police. However, if this were the case, our results should be considered as conservative. Further research based on prospective data is needed to analyse in greater detail not only the pathway between violence and HIV infection but also the impact of violence on women reproductive health, in particular unwanted pregnancies and abortion. However, even in the absence of additional research, governments in sub-Saharan Africa should revise their prostitution-related laws and work tightly with organizations representing FSWs, religious leaders, legislators, public personalities and with the civil society to fight violence against women in general and FSWs in particular.
Conclusion
Violence in general and sexual violence in particular was associated with both HIV prevalence and condom breakage that appeared to be the main intermediate factor between violence and HIV infection. To prevent violence against FSWs, there is a need for all the community to contribute to the protection of their human rights.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the contribution all the staff involved in this project, in particular the staff of the NACP. Above all, we are indebted to all the women who participated in the study. Funding was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant # ROH-115205).
Sources of funding:
This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant # ROH-115205).
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Author’s contributions
Authors’ contribution: FKT had the main responsibility for data analysis and drafted the manuscript. SD participated in the supervision of data collection and contributed significantly to data analysis and preparation of the manuscript. FAG and FK participated in the data collection and reviewed critically the content of the manuscript. CA, DMZ, AP and EB were involved in the study design and implementation, and reviewed critically the content of the manuscript. RB contributed significantly to data analysis and preparation of the manuscript. MA was responsible for the overall study design and the implementation of the survey, and contributed significantly to the preparation of the manuscript. All authors approved the final content of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Report on the global AIDS Epidemic. [Accessed May 09, 2013.];[Joint united Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) web site] 2012 Available at: http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/epidemiology/2012/gr2012/20121120_UNAIDS_Global_Report_2012_with_annexes_en.pdf.
- 2.Lowndes CM, Alary M, Belleau M, et al. Characterisation of the HIV epidemic and response in West Africa: Implications for prevention. Washington, DC: World Bank Global HIV/AIDS Program Report; Nov, 2008. [Accessed May 09, 2013..]. World bank web site. Available: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTHIVAIDS/Resources/375798-1132695455908/WestAfricaSynthesisNov26.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scorgie F, Nakato D, Harper E, et al. ‘We are despised in the hospitals’: sex workers’ experiences of accessing health care in four African countries. Cult Health Sex. 2013;15:450–465. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2012.763187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Okal J, Chersich MF, Tsui S, et al. Sexual and physical violence against female sex workers in Kenya: a qualitative enquiry. AIDS Care. 2011;23:612–618. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.525605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rhodes T, Simic M, Baros S, et al. Police violence and sexual risk among female and transvestite sex workers in Serbia: qualitative study. BMJ. 2008;337:S811. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wechsberg WM, Luseno WK, Lam WK. Violence against substance-abusing South African sex workers: intersection with culture and HIV risk. AIDS Care. 2005;17 (Suppl 1):S55–64. doi: 10.1080/09540120500120419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Decker MR, McCauley HL, Phuengsamran D, et al. Violence victimisation, sexual risk and sexually transmitted infection symptoms among female sex workers in Thailand. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86:236–240. doi: 10.1136/sti.2009.037846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Siemieniuk RA, Krentz HB, Miller P, et al. The clinical implications of high rates of intimate partner violence against HIV-positive women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31829bb007. Publish Ahead of Print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shannon K, Csete J. Violence, condom negotiation, and HIV/STI risk among sex workers. JAMA. 2010;304:573–574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Frye V, Ompad D, Chan C, et al. Intimate partner violence perpetration and condom use-related factors: associations with heterosexual men’s consistent condom use. AIDS Behav. 2011;15:153–162. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9659-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Choi SY, Chen KL, Jiang ZQ. Client-perpetuated violence and condom failure among female sex workers in southwestern China. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35:141–146. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815407c3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maman S, Mbwambo JK, Hogan NM, et al. HIV-positive women report more lifetime partner violence: findings from a voluntary counseling and testing clinic in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1331–1337. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.8.1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kayibanda JF, Bitera R, Alary M. Violence toward women, men’s sexual risk factors, and HIV infection among women: findings from a national household survey in Rwanda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59:300–307. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31823dc634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kouyoumdjian FG, Calzavara LM, Bondy SJ, et al. Intimate partner violence is associated with incident HIV infection in women in Uganda. AIDS. 2013;27:1331–1338. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835fd851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ramesh S, Ganju D, Mahapatra B, et al. Relationship between mobility, violence and HIV/STI among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:764. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pando MA, Coloccini RS, Reynaga E, et al. Violence as a barrier for HIV prevention among female sex workers in Argentina. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Deering KN, Bhattacharjee P, Mohan HL, et al. Violence and HIV risk among female sex workers in Southern India. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40:168–174. doi: 10.1097/olq.0b013e31827df174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Family Health International United States Agency for International Development Joint United Programme on HIV/AIDS. Behavioral Surveillance Surveys: Guidelines for Repeated Behavioral Surveys in Populations at Risk of HIV. Arlington, TX: FHI-USAID-UNAIDS; 2000. [Accessed May 20, 2013.]. Available at: http://www.who.int/hiv/strategic/en/bss_fhi2000.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–1182. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.World Health Organization (WHO) Violence against women and HIV/AIDS: Critical intersections-violence against sex workers and HIV prevention. Geneva, Switzerland: 2005. [Accessed May 6, 2013.]. Available at: http://www.who.int/gender/documents/sexworkers.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gupta GR. Gender, Sexuality, and HIV/AIDS: The What, the Why, and the How. Presented at: XIIth International AIDS conferenc; Durban, South Africa. 2000.. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jewkes RK, Dunkle K, Nduna M, et al. Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: a cohort study. Lancet. 2010;376:41–48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60548-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Panchanadeswaran S, Johnson SC, Sivaram S, et al. Intimate partner violence is as important as client violence in increasing street-based female sex workers’ vulnerability to HIV in India. Int J Drug Policy. 2008;19:106–112. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jewkes RK, Sikweyiya Y, Morrell R, et al. Technical report. Medical Research Council; Pretoria. South Africa: 2009. [Accessed May 09, 2013.]. Understanding men’s health and Use of violence: interface of rape and hiv in south africa. Available at: http://www.mrc.ac.za/gender/interfaceofrape&hivsarpt.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Banandur P, Rajaram SP, Mahagaonkar SB, et al. Heterogeneity of the HIV epidemic in the general population of Karnataka state, south India. BMC Public Health. 2011;11 (Suppl 6):S13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S6-S13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zierler S, Cunningham WE, Andersen R, et al. Violence victimization after HIV infection in a US probability sample of adult patients in primary care. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:208–215. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.2.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Simic M, Rhodes T. Violence, dignity and HIV vulnerability: street sex work in Serbia. Sociol Health Illn. 2009;31:1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hong Y, Li X, Fang X, et al. Depressive symptoms and condom use with clients among female sex workers in China. Sex Health. 2007;4:99–104. doi: 10.1071/sh06063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gray RH, Wawer MJ, Brookmeyer R, et al. Probability of HIV-1 transmission per coital act in monogamous, heterosexual, HIV-1-discordant couples in Rakai, Uganda. Lancet. 2001;357:1149–1153. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04331-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mann JR, Stine CC, Vessey J. The role of disease-specific infectivity and number of disease exposures on long-term effectiveness of the latex condom. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:344–349. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200206000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]