Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Feb 26;143(1):87–110. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.02.007

Targeting the Mevalonate Cascade as a New Therapeutic Approach in Heart Disease, Cancer and Pulmonary Disease

Behzad Yeganeh 1, Emmilia Wiechec 2, Sudharsana R Ande 3, Pawan Sharma 4, Adel Rezaei Moghadam 5,6, Martin Post 1, Darren H Freed 7, Mohammad Hashemi 8, Shahla Shojaei 9, Amir A Zeki 10,*, Saeid Ghavami 11,*
PMCID: PMC4005604  NIHMSID: NIHMS570863  PMID: 24582968

Abstract

The cholesterol biosynthesis pathway, also known as the mevalonate (MVA) pathway, is an essential cellular pathway that is involved in diverse cell functions. The enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase (HMGCR) is the rate-limiting step in cholesterol biosynthesis and catalyzes the conversion of HMG-CoA to MVA.

Given its role in cholesterol and isoprenoid biosynthesis, the regulation of HMGCR has been intensely investigated. Because all cells require a steady supply of MVA, both the sterol (i.e. cholesterol) and non-sterol (i.e. isoprenoid) products of MVA metabolism exert coordinated feedback regulation on HMGCR through different mechanisms. The proper functioning of HMGCR as the proximal enzyme in the MVA pathway is essential under both normal physiologic conditions and in many diseases given its role in cell cycle pathways and cell proliferation, cholesterol biosynthesis and metabolism, cell cytoskeletal dynamics and stability, cell membrane structure and fluidity, mitochondrial function, proliferation, and cell fate.

The blockbuster statin drugs (‘statins’) directly bind to and inhibit HMGCR, and their use for the past thirty years has revolutionized the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular diseases, in particular coronary heart disease. Initially thought to exert their effects through cholesterol reduction, recent evidence indicates that statins also have pleiotropic immunomodulatory properties independent of cholesterol lowering.

In this review we will focus on the therapeutic applications and mechanisms involved in the MVA cascade including Rho GTPase and Rho kinase (ROCK) signaling, statin inhibition of HMGCR, geranylgeranyltransferase (GGTase) inhibition, and farnesyltransferase (FTase) inhibition in cardiovascular disease, pulmonary diseases (e.g. asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cancer.

Keywords: Statins, geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitors, farnesy transferase inhibtors, Rho GTPase, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fibrosis, cancer

Introduction

Triacylglycerols (16%), phospholipids (30%), cholesterol (14%), cholesteryl esters (36%) and unesterified long chain fatty acids (4%) form the major component of plasma lipids. Cholesterol was extracted from gallstones for the first time (cholestrine: solid bile) in ancient Greece (Endo, 2010), yet the molecular formula of cholesterol was first established only in 1888.

Cholesterol and cholesteryl esters are major constituents of plasma lipids which are also widely distributed in all cells of the body especially in nervous tissue (Vance, 2012). Cholesterol is a major component of the cell plasma membrane and plasma lipoprotein structure. Cholesterol has significant effects on membrane fluidity and membrane ultrastructure, and its unique structure is necessary for steroid biosynthesis (Simons & Vaz, 2004).

Cellular cholesterol content is tightly regulated despite wide fluctuations in extracellular serum concentrations (Simons & Ikonen, 2000). 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase (HMGCR) is the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis, it catalyzes the conversion of HMG-CoA to MVA, and is ubiquitously expressed in all cells (Goldstein & Brown, 1984, 1990).

The MVA pathway in humans is indispensable for de novo synthesis of cholesterol and other molecules essential for many cellular functions (Goldstein & Brown, 1990). The cholesterol molecule consists of 27 carbons, which is synthesized in 30 enzymatic reactions [with all of the carbon atoms originally derived from acetate] (Gaylor, 2002; Goldstein & Brown, 1990; Kovacs, Olivier, & Krisans, 2002). MVA itself is synthesized in an irreversible step from the HMG-CoA and is then further metabolized to the isoprenoids farnesyl diphosphate, a.k.a. farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP), and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP), precursors for a number of important metabolites including the sterols, dolichols, ubiquinones (Coenzyme Q), isoprenoids, and carotenoids. These molecules are required for membrane formation (cholesterol), protein N-glycosylation (dolichols), mitochondrial electron transport chain function (ubiquinone), protein-cell membrane anchoring (isoprenoids), and free radical scavengers (carotenoids) (Goldstein & Brown, 1990).

A schematic of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway is shown in Figure 1. Upstream of cholesterol in the MVA pathway, FPP and GGPP are substrates for the post-translational modification (a.k.a. isoprenylation) of proteins including the Ras and Rho family GTPases (i.e. monomeric, small G proteins), which play a role in numerous cellular mechanisms (Goldstein & Brown, 1990; Swanson & Hohl, 2006).

Figure 1. Overview of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway.

Figure 1

(A) Farnesol or related isoperinoids regulate Ras farnesylation and other GTPases like Rho and Ras, resulting in GTPase activation and p53-mediated induction of apoptosis and cell growth regulation. (B) Inhibition of squalene synthase (SQS) decreases raft-associated cholesterol levels, thus attenuates cancer cell proliferation and also induces death of cancer cell. (C) Suppression of cholesterol biosynthesis from lanosterol leads to inhibition of cell cycle progression and also cell differentiation. (D) AEBS ligands are associated with zymosterol and 7-dehydrocholesterol, which can induce cancer cell differentiation and death through the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxysterols. Suppression of ROS production by antioxidants leads to cell survival through an autophagic process by induction of AEBS ligands. (E) Cholesteryl esters of fatty acids (CEFA) is the product of intracellular cholesterol esterification that is catalyzed by the Acyl-coA:Cholesterol Acyl Transferase (ACAT) using cholesterol and fatty acyl-coenzyme A esters (RCoA). CEFA is the major lipid found in foam cells which plays important role in atherosclerosis. CEFA is also implicated in the stimulation of cancer cell proliferation, invasiveness and mitogenesis.

The MVA pathway and in particular cholesterol biosynthesis have been extensively studied and found to be associated with several diseases such as hypercholesterolemia, coronary artery disease, and stroke. HMGCR is the most important and proximal enzyme in this pathway, and serves as the rate-limiting step in cholesterol biosynthesis (Goldstein & Brown, 1984, 1990). It is one of the most highly regulated enzymes known and is located in the endoplasmic reticulum (Goldstein & Brown, 1990).

The human HMGCR is composed of 888 amino acids (339 membrane-associated and 548 soluble catalytic residues) (Liscum, et al., 1985). Several studies have confirmed that both membrane and catalytic domains are highly conserved in different species (Luskey, 1988).

HMGCR plays a central role in cholesterol biosynthesis regulation and is regulated at different levels (Zammit & Easom, 1987) including HMGCR mRNA synthesis (Osborne, Goldstein, & Brown, 1985), mRNA translation (Panini, Schnitzer-Polokoff, Spencer, & Sinensky, 1989), HMGCR protein degradation (Gil, Faust, Chin, Goldstein, & Brown, 1985), and HMGCR enzyme activity (Alberts, et al., 1980b) via complex hormonal regulation (Simonet & Ness, 1988).

Cholesterol itself inhibits HMGCR gene expression via negative feedback mechanisms (Goldstein & Brown, 1990). Membrane fluidity of the endoplasmic reticulum also regulates HMGCR activity (Goldstein & Brown, 1990). HMGCR activity may also be regulated via phosphorylation (inactive form) or dephosphorylation (active form) mechanisms which depend on the action of protein kinases (Goldstein & Brown, 1990).

A certain class of drugs, namely the statins, is capable of inhibiting the synthesis of endogenous cholesterol via competitive inhibition of HMGCR. Statins were originally discovered as Penicillium citrinum-derived metabolites with extremely potent inhibitory properties against HMGCR (Endo, Hasumi, & Negishi, 1985; Endo, Kuroda, & Tsujita, 1976). From this discovery, lovastatin was developed and used to reduce endogenous cholesterol synthesis serving as a valuable pharmacologic treatment for patients with hypercholesterolemia (Alberts, 1988b) (Montecucco, Quercioli, Mirabelli-Badenier, Viviani, & Mach, 2012; Raper, Kolansky, & Cuchel, 2012; Shepherd, et al., 1995a; Q. Zhou & Liao, 2009).

Over the past decade it has become evident that the statins also exhibit immunomodulatory,, anti-inflammatory, (Greenwood, Steinman, & Zamvil, 2006; Steffens & Mach, 2004) and neuroprotective (Greenwood, et al., 2006; Kivipelto, Solomon, & Winblad, 2005) effects.

Statins encompass a complex group of compounds, which differ from each other in their chemical structure, physiochemical and pharmacokinetic properties despite having similar biological activity. Statins can occur naturally as fermentation products of microorganisms (lovastatin, mevastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin) or obtained by chemical synthesis (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, pitavastatin, cerivastatin) (Wierzbicki, 2001). Simvastatin and lovastatin active forms exist as the β-hydroxyacid open side chain, which is produced by liver carboxyestrases (CE) (Demierre, Higgins, Gruber, Hawk, & Lippman, 2005). Pravastatin does not require enzymatic conversion/activation because it exists in the active open ring form. Its structure is similar to lovastatin but with different side chain residues (Solomon & Freeman, 2008). Atorvastatin also exists in the active form and CE conversion is not required, however, due to liver extraction mechanisms its bioavailability is low in peripheral tissues (Goldstein & Brown, 1990).

In Figure 2 we have summarized the effects of the statins, GGTase inhibitors (GGTIs), and FTase inhibitors (FTIs) in the MVA cascade.

Figure 2. Effect of different inhibitors on the mevalonate pathway.

Figure 2

Statins, bisphosphonates, FTIs and GGTIs are different classes of drugs which have various inhibitory effects on the MVA pathway. Statins block the conversion of HMG-CoA to MVA by suppressing the HMGCR and thereby inhibits Rac geranylgeranylation and Ras farnesylation. Statins also attenuate reactive oxygen species (ROS) derived from NADPH oxidase. Bisphosphonates (BPs) inhibit the IPP isomerase and isoprenoid biosynthesis downstream by targeting FPP synthase and indirectly interfering with protein isoprenylation. FTIs and GGTIs are prenyltransferase inhibitors. The formation of a covalent bond between the isoprenoids FPP and GGPP and the GTPases (e.g. Ras, Rho and Rac) by prenyl transferases is targeted by FTIs and GGTIs. Other inhibitors such as squalene synthase inhibitors (SQSIs) and oxidosqualene cyclase inhibitors (OSCIs) target the synthesis of the cholesterol precursor squalene and lanosterol synthesis, respectively.

Pleiotropy of HMGCR Inhibitors (Statins)

The pleiotropy of statins occurs on several levels. First, by inhibiting the canonical target HMGCR, they deplete not only MVA but also the downstream isoprenoids FPP and GGPP, thereby reducing isoprenylation which affects their intracellular localization. Typically, non-isoprenylated GTPases remain cytosolic. Isoprenylated GTPases have the FPP or GGPP lipid attachment that then allows them to anchor in cell membranes. These anchored GTPases are then able to participate in signal transduction. Therefore, inhibiting isoprenylation results in the inactivation of the small GTPases (Rho, Ras, Rac and Cdc24) which are essential in many cellular events (e.g. intracellular signal transduction, and cellular proliferation, inflammation, and motility). Second, statins have off-target or non-canonical effects by directly inhibiting other enzymes such as leukocyte function antigen-1 (LFA-1) (Weitz-Schmidt, 2003; Zeki, Kenyon, & Goldkorn, 2011).

The GTPases play an important role in a variety of other cellular processes such as apoptosis, phagocytosis, vascular trafficking, cellular proliferation and transmigration, cytoskeleton dynamics, recruitment of inflammatory cells, and cell cycle regulation among other events (Zeki, et al., 2011)[Greenwood 2006]. Thus, by depleting the pool of available isoprenoids, statins indirectly alter GTPase function and thereby affect a multitude of cellular processes dependent on GTPase signaling.

Inhibitory effects of statins on cholesterol and isoprenoids affects endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS), a critical enzyme in the physiological and pathophysiological responses of the vascular endothelium (Mihos, Salas, & Santana, 2010) (Figure 2). Also, statins decrease the levels of inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa-beta (NF-κB) indicating their role in inflammatory responses. Statins also exhibit pleiotropic effects by inhibiting peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) (i.e. functional inhibition) (Yano, et al., 2007; Q. Zhou & Liao, 2010).

In macrophages, statin treatment increases the transcriptional activity of PPARγ, inhibits lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) mRNA expression, and represses the transcriptional activity of activated protein-1 (AP-1) through PPARα and PPARγ (Yano, et al., 2007; Q. Zhou & Liao, 2010). Statins also stabilize atherosclerotic plaques through activation of PPARγ (Yano, et al., 2007; Q. Zhou & Liao, 2010). Other pleiotropic effects include: inhibition of platelet aggregation; decrease in thromboxane A2 biosynthesis; reduction of migration and proliferation and increase of apoptosis in the vascular smooth muscle cells (Yano, et al., 2007; Q. Zhou & Liao, 2010).

Interestingly, statins also have effects on immunomodulation, the normalization of sympathetic neural outflow, and decrease the activation of the blood coagulating cascade (Mihos, et al., 2010). In macrophages, statins reduce cholesterol accumulation, MCP-1, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) secretion along with cell proliferation and activity (Q. Zhou & Liao, 2010).

The pleiotropic effects of statins may also be affected by their lipophilicity, half-life and potency (Q. Zhou & Liao, 2010). For example, the lipophilic statins such as simvastatin and fluvastatin can enter cells by passive diffusion, whereas the hydrophobic statins such as pravastatin and rosuvastatin cannot enter by passive diffusion, and instead require cell membrane protein transporters. Thus, the chemical structure of the different statins and their distinct physiochemical properties can influence their pleiotropic properties. Given these pleiotropic effects and the varied cellular mechanisms that are affected, statins have the potential to affect many disorders beyond just cardiovascular diseases.

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

The Mevalonte Pathway, Statins, and Cardiovascular Disease

Dysregulated cholesterol metabolism is implicated as a significant risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerotic narrowing of blood vessels leads to end-organ dysfunction, including the heart, kidneys, limbs, and brain. Furthermore, atherosclerotic plaque rupture leads to acute vessel thrombosis with end-organ mal-perfusion and infarction.

HMGCR inhibition using statins mitigates dyslipidemia and in turn improves cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients at risk not only through the prevention of atherosclerotic plaque formation, but also by stabilizing existing plaques. Many large scale multi-center trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of these compounds in reducing vascular event rates and in improving survival (Pedersen, et al., 2000; "Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)," 1994).

Statins were first discovered as secondary metabolites of yeast (Alberts, 1988a; Alberts, et al., 1980a). Subsequent clinical studies of these compounds for the treatment of dyslipidemia were quite encouraging with respect to improving human lipid profiles. Consequently, these compounds were then developed for the treatment of dyslipidemia as an important risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease (CAD) ("Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)," 1994; Shepherd, et al., 1995b).

Patients treated with statins were also found to have fewer non-fatal myocardial infarctions (MIs) and fewer strokes. This phenomenon was described in several large randomized control trials, such as the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial (Sacks, et al., 1996), the Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) trial ("Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group," 1998), and the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) (Downs, et al., 1998).

CRP is also a biomarker of vascular and systemic inflammation, and is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events (Ridker, et al., 2005). As demonstrated in the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT) study, patients who were taking statins and had a significant reduction in CRP had a significant improvement in event-free survival (Cannon, et al., 2004; Ridker, et al., 2005). The Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid lowering (REVERSAL) trial showed that aggressive treatment with atorvastatin improved lipid profiles and CRP levels compared to pravastatin, suggesting that this is not just a class effect, and may be dose related (Nissen, et al., 2004).

It is important to note that there is significant heterogeneity in the structure and function of the various compounds in the statin class, and this translates into non-uniform effects in cell signaling as well as clinical outcomes (Arnaboldi & Corsini, 2010; Hilgendorff, et al., 2003). Despite this apparent heterogeneity, further head-to-head comparisons in clinical studies are required to confirm these observations.

The dose effect of statins has also been extensively studied, and a meta-analysis of these major studies has confirmed that “intensive” statin therapy is more efficacious than “moderate” therapy (Cannon, Steinberg, Murphy, Mega, & Braunwald, 2006). Specifically in the context of acute coronary syndromes, the Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) trial demonstrated a significant reduction in early recurrent ischemic events in patients receiving high dose atorvastatin (Schwartz, et al., 2001).

Due to the success of statins in secondary prevention, the use of statins for primary prevention in high-risk patients has also been studied. For example, The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS) study showed that men who had hyperlipidemia but no history of MI had a significant reduction in cholesterol levels and less non-fatal MI or death from CAD with pravastatin administration (Shepherd, et al., 1995b). Further subgroup analysis of this study and the CARE study revealed that treated patients had a significant reduction in CV events compared to placebo despite having similar lipid profiles, suggesting a mechanism of action independent of cholesterol or low density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction (Sacks, et al., 1996; Shepherd, et al., 1995b).

Supporting this idea, the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-lipid lower arm (ASCOT-LLA) demonstrated the protective effect of low dose atorvastatin in hypertensive, non-dyslipidemic patients (Sever, et al., 2003). The Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial took it a step further, examining healthy individuals without hyperlipidemia but with elevated CRP levels. They found a significant reduction in the composite endpoint of MI, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes (Ridker, et al., 2008b).

These more recent studies, and especially the JUPITER trial, support the hypothesis that statins have lipid-independent effects and properties that mitigate systemic and endovascular inflammation.

Statin Pharmacotherapy in Cardiovascular Health and Diabetes

The beneficial effects of statins outlined above have been studied specifically in diabetics, and similar observations have been made in this patient population as well. For example, the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) showed that low dose atorvastatin was safe and efficacious in reducing cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetics without high LDL cholesterol.

However, in the JUPITER trial, it was found that diabetes was diagnosed in 27% more patients receiving rosuvastatin than those receiving placebo. Despite this, patients in the JUPITER trial still experienced a significant reduction in cardiovascular events. A subsequent meta-analysis of WPSCOPS, HPS, LIPID, ASCOT, JUPITER and CORONA, totaling 57,593 patients suggested that there was a small increase in diabetes risk with statin therapy (RR 1.13), but also that there was significant heterogeneity in these trials, making firm conclusions difficult (Rajpathak, et al., 2009).

Given these controversial results, dispensing warnings have been added to statin medications to inform patients of the potential risk. Most experts agree that at present, the health benefits of statins in patients with CV disease far outweigh these potential risks, and statins are still recommended for patients with CV risk factors and clear evidence of atherosclerosis.

Putative Mechanisms of Statin Pharmacotherapy in Cardiovascular Disease

The beneficial effects of statins beyond lipid-lowering are thought to occur through effects on the endothelium, vascular smooth muscle cells, and the myocardium itself. Atherosclerosis is a complex process that involves chronic low-grade vascular inflammation and lipid accumulation in the vessel wall. Therefore the effect of statins on lipid profile will positively affect lipid accumulation in the atherosclerotic plaque.

However, statins have been found to have anti-inflammatory properties through inhibition of the transcription factor NF-κB, a key mediator of inflammatory gene expression (Thurberg & Collins, 1998). NF-κB is also known as a key mediator of atherosclerosis (De Martin, Hoeth, Hofer-Warbinek, & Schmid, 2000). Beyond this mechanism, statins also affect other pathways such as nitric oxide metabolism, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) and angiotensin signaling, small G-protein function, and adrenergic signaling in addition to direct immunomodulation, reviewed elsewhere (Jasinska, Owczarek, & Orszulak-Michalak, 2007)).

These factors culminate in the broad positive effects of statins on CV disorders where dyslipidemia per se may not be the only pathogenic event mediating disease outcomes.

Statins and Heart Failure

Heart failure patients who receive a statin have improved survival compared to those not on a statin (Horwich, MacLellan, & Fonarow, 2004). However, in a subsequent randomized controlled trial named CORONA (Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Study in Heart Failure) that investigated elderly patients with systolic heart failure taking rosuvastatin versus placebo, there was no difference in the composite end-point of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal MI or non-fatal stroke, despite improvements in CRP levels and LDL cholesterol compared to placebo. However, rosuvastatin reduced the number of cardiovascular-related hospitalizations.(Kjekshus, et al., 2007).

Therefore, despite the basic science data suggesting that statins provide a direct myocardial benefit (Dechend, et al., 2001; Y. Liao, et al., 2008; J. Liu, Shen, & Wu, 2008; Pliquett, Cornish, Peuler, & Zucker, 2003), these effects have not been realized clinically in patients with heart failure.

Statins and Atrial Fibrillation

There is substantial evidence supporting a link between inflammation and atrial fibrillation (AF) (Boos, Anderson, & Lip, 2006; Engelmann & Svendsen, 2005). A meta-analysis of randomized control trials on AF and statin therapy suggested a significant decline in the risk of AF in patients with sinus rhythm but with a history of previous AF, in patients undergoing heart surgery, or in patients after acute coronary syndrome (Fauchier, et al., 2008). However, this beneficial effect was not confirmed in a second contemporaneous meta-analysis of the PROVE IT-TIMI22 study and the A to Z trial (McLean, et al., 2008). On the other hand, and specifically in the cardiac surgical population, a very large meta-analysis of 54 reports encompassing over 90,000 patients demonstrated a clear reduction in peri-operative mortality, AF, stroke, ICU stay, and hospital stay (Kuhn, et al., 2013). It appears that statins may have a protective effect in some subpopulations and risk strata of AF, but not in all patients with AF.

New Developments in Mevalonate Pathway Pharmacotherapy in Heart Diseases

Given the success of statins in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and their application to other disease, additional compounds that interfere with the MVA signaling pathway are being investigated. These include the GGTase inhibitors, FTIs, and squalene synthase inhibitors. These compounds have largely been studied in the context of cancer therapeutics with essentially only experimental studies on their cardiovascular effects.

For example, the FTI Manumycin A was found to prevent atherosclerosis development and reduce oxidative stress in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice (Sugita, Sugita, & Kaneki, 2007). This compound also inhibited the formation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in a small animal model of cardiac transplantation (W. Stein, et al., 2011).

Individuals with the genetic disease Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome have premature cardiovascular disease as a part of the illness. The FTI tipifarnib (R115777, Zarnestra) was shown to diminish both the onset and late progression of cardiovascular disease in a mouse model of this syndrome (Capell, et al., 2008) (Figure 2).

Whether these findings can be extrapolated to the general population at risk for cardiovascular disease remains to be determined. Finally, the squalene synthase inhibitor lapaquistat acetate has been studied in several trials. Despite reductions in LDL cholesterol and CRP, there were concerns over liver toxicity and therefore development and testing has been largely suspended (E. A. Stein, et al., 2011).

This remains an area open for further investigations, including potential combination therapies utilizing multiple pharmacologic inhibitors of the MVA pathway, perhaps in combination using lower doses.

CANCER

The Mevalonate Pathway and Cancer

The MVA pathway has been implicated in different aspects of tumorigenesis, as statins (being inhibitors of HMGCR) display novel anti-cancer capabilities (Thurnher, Nussbaumer, & Gruenbacher, 2012). Statins exert anti-proliferative, anti-angiogenic, pro-apoptotic, and anti-metastatic action on cancer cells via inhibition of both isoprenoid (e.g. FPP, GGPP) and cholesterol synthesis in the MVA pathway.

There is therefore considerable interest in modulating the MVA pathway in order to prevent and treat different types of cancers (Demierre, et al., 2005; Gazzerro, et al., 2011; Hindler, Cleeland, Rivera, & Collard, 2006; Slawinska & Kandefer-Szerszen, 2008; Swanson & Hohl, 2006). Some experts have even argued that HMGCR is a candidate ‘metabolic oncogene’ (Clendening, et al., 2010), given the role of HMGCR and MA pathway in cellular transformation (Clendening & Penn, 2012).

Various in vitro and in vivo studies have revealed the cytostatic and cytotoxic properties of statins on cancer cells. Cytostatic properties of statins are due to both impaired cholesterol synthesis and inhibition of isoprenoid production (Ghavami, Yeganeh, et al., 2012; Lewis, Holstein, & Hohl, 2005). The metabolites MVA and GGPP are able to fully overcome the anti-mitotic effect of statins (Seeger, Wallwiener, & Mueck, 2003; Soma, Corsini, & Paoletti, 1992). Moreover, lovastatin and simvastatin are able to alter the expression of various proteins regulating cell cycle (p21 and p27) and to arrest cancer cells in the G1/S phases (Jakobisiak, Bruno, Skierski, & Darzynkiewicz, 1991; Koyuturk, Ersoz, & Altiok, 2004; Rao, Lowe, Herliczek, & Keyomarsi, 1998).

Statins (cerivastatin and lovastatin) also interfere with Ras- and Rho-dependent cell proliferation by inhibiting protein farnesylation (Bouterfa, et al., 2000; Denoyelle, et al., 2001). Immunohistochemical studies have revealed statin effects on karyokinesis and cytokinesis as well as chromosomal aberrations leading to the inhibition of cell growth and subsequent apoptosis (Hindler, et al., 2006; Lamprecht, et al., 1999).

Cholesterol, one of the key end-products of the MVA pathway is indispensable for the formation of blood vessels. Statins prevent angiogenesis by down-regulating pro-angiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation, and blocking cell adhesion to extracellular matrix (ECM) (Feleszko, et al., 1999; Frick, et al., 2003; Nubel, Dippold, Kleinert, Kaina, & Fritz, 2004; Schaefer, et al., 2004; Weis, Heeschen, Glassford, & Cooke, 2002).

The ability of statins to induce apoptosis in cancer cells has been widely studied and several insights into the mechanism of action have been revealed. There are different models of promoting apoptosis in cancer cells depending on the cell type.

In multiple myeloma (MM) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), statins (cerivastatin and lovastatin) have been shown to activate the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis by activating caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9 (Cafforio, Dammacco, Gernone, & Silvestris, 2005; I. K. Wang, Lin-Shiau, & Lin, 2000; W. W. Wong, Dimitroulakos, Minden, & Penn, 2002). The simvastatin-mediated induction of apoptosis in breast cancer cells correlates to the activation of pro-apoptotic Bax and the down-regulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 gene expression (Spampanato, et al., 2012).

In addition, suppression of NF-κB transcriptional activity is responsible for the pro-apoptotic effect of simvastatin in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (Ahn, Sethi, & Aggarwal, 2007). More detailed analyses have revealed that inactivation of NF-κB augments the PI3/Akt pathway, which results in enhanced sensitivity of lung and breast cancer cells to apoptosis (Denoyelle, et al., 2003; Hwang, et al., 2011).

Simvastatin can also induce apoptosis via involvement of c-jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) in breast cancer cells offering a new approach of targeting the JNK signaling pathway for breast cancer treatment (Gopalan, Yu, Sanders, & Kline, 2013; Koyuturk, Ersoz, & Altiok, 2007). This raises the possibility that statins may serve as an important adjunctive treatment for certain types of cancers, including epithelial-based cancers such as breast cancer.

A fundamental feature of cancer cells is their ability to promote angiogenesis in order to increase their tumor size and achieve metastatic spread. As a result, malignant cancers are characterized by substantial secretion of MMPs. Because of their ECM-degrading activity, and the correlation between elevated levels of their activity and increased tumor metastasis, MMPs were primarily believed to facilitate tumor cell metastasis (Chang & Werb, 2001).

Of note, recent studies indicate that statins can prevent metastasis formation. Lovastatin, fluvastatin, and simvastatin can reduce the expression of MMPs (Lev, Gilburd, Lahat, & Shoenfeld, 2002; Luan, Chase, & Newby, 2003). Essential to the process of metastasis is the ability to alter vascular permeability and integrity. Statins take part in the induction of the vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin expression in order to prevent intra- and extra-vasation of primary tumors (Duncan, El-Sohemy, & Archer, 2004; Hindler, et al., 2006; J. Zhang, et al., 2013). Additionally, statins alter cytoskeleton organization following modulation of adhesion, motility, and proteolysis in order to prevent metastasis (Collisson, et al., 2003; Farina, Bublik, Alonso, & Gomez, 2002).

Statins also exert anti-inflammatory action in the vicinity of the tumors in order to mitigate the host immune response. Lovastatin, simvastatin, and mevastatin are able to block lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1), which activates migration of T-cells (Weitz-Schmidt, et al., 2001).

Another anti-inflammatory reaction of statins is the inhibition of NF-κB, which is essential for the synthesis of many cytokines and adhesion molecules necessary for the inflammatory response (Hilgendorff, et al., 2003).

An Overview of the Small Rho GTPase Proteins and Cancers

The Rho GTPase family belongs to the Ras super family of proteins that are conserved and widely expressed in different tissues and in mammalian cell lines (Foster, et al., 1996; Marks & Kwiatkowski, 1996). This family currently consists of three subfamilies, Rho (RhoA, RhoB, and RhoC), Rac (Rac1, Rac2, and Rac3) and Cell Division Cycle-42(Cdc42) (CDC42Hs and G25K) (Boureux, Vignal, Faure, & Fort, 2007). However, the best-characterized family members are RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42.

Activation of Rac has been shown to induce actin polymerization to form lamellipodia (broad web-like extensions), while Cdc42 activation stimulates the polymerization of actin to filopodia or micro-spikes (long and thin extensions) (Lamarche, et al., 1996). In contrast, Rho regulates bundling of actin filaments into stress fibers and the formation of focal adhesion complexes (Mackay, Esch, Furthmayr, & Hall, 1997). Furthermore, Rho appears to inhibit myosin phosphatase through the action of Rho kinase, activated by GTP (Kimura, et al., 1996).

Like the Ras oncoproteins, members of the small Rho GTPase family function as molecular switches, cycling between an active GTP-bound form and an inactive GDP-bound form (Oleksy, Opalinski, Derewenda, Derewenda, & Otlewski, 2006). The activity of small Rho GTPase is mainly regulated by Guanine nucleotide Exchange Factors (GEFs), which stimulate the exchange of GDP for GTP to generate the activated form of the enzyme. Rho GTPase activity is down-regulated by GTPase Activating Proteins (GAPs), which stimulate the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP (Oleksy, et al., 2006; Ridley, 2006). In addition, guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) block both nucleotide hydrolysis and exchange by interacting with the isoprenylated, GDP-bound form and thus control GDP/GTP cycling. This in turn affects the movement of Rho GTPase between cytosol and cell membranes (Figure 3).

Figure 3. The Rho GTPase molecular switch.

Figure 3

When cell is in resting state, Rho GTPases exist mostly in the cytosol, in inactive (GDP-bound) form, in complexes with Rho GDI. Following an activation signal, Rho GTPases are targeted to the membrane by post-translational modification of their COOH termini with lipid moieties (i.e. farnesyl, geranyl-geranyl, palmitoyl and methyl) by geranyl-geranyltransferases (GGTases). This reaction allows the activated small GTPases (in the GTP-bound form) to interact with the cell membranes, where they exert their function.

Cycling between an inactive GDP-bound and an active GTP-bound is regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). GEFs release guanosine diphosphate (GDP) from Rho GTPases promoting the binding of guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and activation of Rho GTPases. In the GTP-bound form, Rho proteins undergo a conformational change which allows them to interact with effector proteins and initiate a downstream cellular response. GTPase activating protein (GAP) converts GTP-bound form of Rho GTPases to inactive GDP-GTPases by hydrolyzing GTP into GDP and terminate the signal transduction.

Malignant cells are characterized by deregulated cell cycle control, reduced contact inhibition, loss of matrix-dependent growth regulation, increased cell survival, morphologic alteration, increased motility, and acquisition of invasive and metastatic properties.

Following activation, Rho GTPases bind different effector molecules (including enzymes, adaptor proteins, and actin nucleators) and trigger a signaling cascade to direct cellular responses linked to cell proliferation, cell cycle, and survival. As they are the key regulators of all of these cellular processes, accumulating evidence from basic and clinical studies supports the concept that signaling pathways downstream of Rho GTPases play critical roles in tumor development and progression (Adnane, Muro-Cacho, Mathews, Sebti, & Munoz-Antonia, 2002; Burbelo, Wellstein, & Pestell, 2004; Kimmelman, et al., 2008; Wells, Ahmed, Masters, & Jones, 2005). Furthermore, Rho GTPases have been shown to regulate the release of pro-angiogenic factors to promote angiogenesis (Hoang, Whelan, & Senger, 2004; Uchida, et al., 2000)

Although activating mutations of the Ras isoform proteins are the most frequent oncogenic mutations in human cancer (Prior, Lewis, & Mattos, 2012), Rho proteins are rarely found mutated in tumors. In contrast, Rho proteins expression and/or activity are frequently altered in a variety of human cancers. For instance RhoA, RhoE, RhoC, RhoF Rac1, Rac2, Rac3, Cdc42 and Wrch2/RhoV are frequently overexpressed in many types of cancers (Faried, et al., 2005; Gomez del Pulgar, Benitah, Valeron, Espina, & Lacal, 2005; Gouw, Reading, Jenson, Lim, & Elenitoba-Johnson, 2005; Islam, et al., 2009; X. R. Li, et al., 2006; Ma, et al., 2010; Varker, Phelps, King, & Williams, 2003; C. Zhang, et al., 2007). Despite these observations, RhoA down-regulation in rare conditions such as human renal cell carcinoma has also been reported (Pu, et al., 2008).

While RhoA, RhoB, and RhoC all have the potential to interact with the same downstream effectors, their effects on cell shape and migratory properties are different. RhoC in particular, is involved in tumor growth and metastasis (Clark, Golub, Lander, & Hynes, 2000; Hakem, et al., 2005). In a colon cancer cell line, Bellovin and colleagues (Bellovin, et al., 2006) showed that RhoC expression is increased during epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and contributes to EMT-induced cell migration, while RhoA is decreased during EMT (Bellovin, et al., 2006).

Unlike RhoA and RhoC, RhoB is often down-regulated in human tumors and its expression significantly inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric and lung cancer cells (Sato, et al., 2007; J. Zhou, et al., 2011). In T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), however, RhoB mRNA expression is up-regulated as compared to primary human T-cells (Bhavsar, Infante, Khwaja, & Ridley, 2013). This suggests that RhoB promotes T-ALL progression, in contrast to its inhibitory role in other cancers.

Genomic analysis of melanoma cells using DNA arrays revealed increased gene expression of RhoC in highly metastatic melanoma cells (Clark, et al., 2000). In invasive breast carcinoma cells, RhoA expression inhibits whereas RhoC enhances cancer cell invasion in vitro (Bellovin, et al., 2006; Simpson, Dugan, & Mercurio, 2004). Similarly, Dietrich and colleagues (Dietrich, et al., 2009) investigated the role of RhoA and RhoC in the tumorgenesis of pancreatic carcinoma cells (PCCs). They demonstrated that enhanced expression of RhoC results in a striking increase in the migration and invasion of PCCs, whereas over-expression of RhoA reduced their migration and invasion.

In human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1), however, RhoA regulates the production of MMP-9, affecting matrix remodeling and enhancing migration of endothelial cells through a 3D-matrix protein gel (Abecassis, Olofsson, Schmid, Zalcman, & Karniguian, 2003). Further, in vivo studies using RhoC-deficient mice demonstrated that although loss of RhoC does not affect tumor initiation and development, it decreases tumor cell motility and metastasis (Hakem, et al., 2005).

Although it is not fully clear how RhoC is involved in cell invasion, increased RhoC expression triggered by the Twist-induced over-expression of microRNA-10b in breast cancer may be the possible cause for the induction of metastases (Ma, Teruya-Feldstein, & Weinberg, 2007). The microRNA miR-139 also interacts with ROCK-2 and reduces its expression in hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HCC cells) (C. C. Wong, et al., 2011). Down-regulation of miR-139 in HCC cells also increases invasiveness of these cells in vitro and HCC metastasis in vivo.

More recently, targeting syndecan-1 protein (an integral membrane protein) by microRNA miR-10b, can promote breast cancer cell invasiveness via a Rho-GTPase- and E-cadherin-dependent mechanisms (Ibrahim, et al., 2012).

The Rho subtypes play complex and different roles in any given cancer, and certainly have opposing roles depending on cancer and tissue type. This further highlights the interest that Rho GTPases play an important role in cancer and the need to continue our investigations in this realm.

Potential Role of Statins in Cancer Therapy

The statins may be promising preventative and therapeutic anti-cancer agents (Demierre, et al., 2005; S. Singh & P. P. Singh, 2013). As described above, existing experimental data provide compelling evidence that inhibition of the MVA pathway by statins leads to activation of still incompletely understood anti-cancer mechanisms. Specifically, there may be a role for statins in chemoprevention and the management of tumor development and progression (Mo & Elson, 2004). For example, Matzno and colleagues have shown that treatment of rat myoblasts with various statins (atorvastatin, cerivastatin, fluvastatin, simvastatin (at 3.0 µM) or pravastatin (at 3.0 µM) induced apoptotic cell death via depletion of farnesyl-anchored Ras protein from the cell membrane (Matzno, et al., 2005).

However, despite the significant anti-proliferative and tumoricidal effects of statins demonstrated in vitro (summarized in Table 1), their anti-tumor effects in animal models are modest. And their efficacy in clinical trials has been under debate and questioned by widely conflicting conclusions (Jukema, Cannon, de Craen, Westendorp, & Trompet, 2012). There could be many reasons for this.

Table 1.

Potential Anti-Cancer Effects of Statins

Tumor type Statin Anti-cancer effect
Anti-proliferative capability
Breast cancer
Bladder cancer
Lovastatin Inhibition of cell proliferation by arresting cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle (Rao, et al., 1998)
Downregulation of proliferation-associated proteins (Jakobisiak, et al., 1991)
Breast cancer Cerivastatin Inhibition of cell proliferation by arresting cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle (Denoyelle, et al., 2001)
Breast cancer
Glioma
Simvastatin Inhibition of cell proliferation by activation of JNK and c-Jun phosphorylation (Koyuturk, et al., 2004)
Glioblastoma multiforme Lovastatin Inhibition of cell proliferation by inhibition of Ras farnesylation and interference with actin cytoskeleton (Bouterfa, et al., 2000)
Pro-apoptotic capability
Multiple myeloma (MM)
Lymphoblastic leukemia (LL)
Lovastatin
Cerivastatin
Induction of apoptosis by activation of mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis (Cafforio, et al., 2005) (I. K. Wang, et al., 2000)
Breast cancer
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
Lung cancer
Simvastatin Induction of apoptosis by activation of proapoptotic Bax and decrease in anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 (W. W. Wong, et al., 2002) (Spampanato, et al., 2012)
Induction of apoptosis by activation of c-Jun (Hwang, et al., 2011) (Koyuturk, et al., 2007)
Anti-angiogenic capability
Murine Lewis lung cancer model
Ras-3T3 tumors
Cerivastatin
Atorvastatin
Lovastatin
Decrease of tumor vascularization by down-regulation of VEGF and inhibition of endothelial cells proliferation (Weis, et al., 2002) (Feleszko, et al., 2002)
Anti-metastatic capability
Ras-3T3 tumors
Melanoma
Lovastatin
Fluvastatin
Simvastatin
Atorvastatin
Reduction of MMPs expression by inhibition of Ras isoprenylation (Lev, et al., 2002) (Luan, et al., 2003) (Collisson, et al., 2003)
Colon cancer Lovastatin Inhibition of intra-and extravasation of the primary tumors by downregulation of the endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule E-selectin (Nubel, et al., 2004)
Breast cancer Lovastatin Preventing metastasis by alterations in cytoskeleton organization (Farina, et al., 2002)
Pancreatic cancer
Colon cancer
Lovastatin
Fluvastatin
Reduction of EGF-mediated liver metastases (Kusama, et al., 2002)
Renal cancer
Breast cancer
Lovastatin
Fluvastatin
Reduction of lung metastases by decreased phosphorylation of Rac-1 and cytoskeleton reorganization (Farina, et al., 2002; Horiguchi, Sumitomo, Asakuma, Asano, & Hayakawa, 2004)

As a general concept, any tissue-specific cancer is not simply a single disease but rather is a heterogeneous group of diseases with different underlying molecular mechanisms. This could potentially explain why studies of cancer in statin-treated patients do not show consistent protective effects. If any, the beneficial effects of statins for cancer prevention and/or treatment will need to be targeted to the cancer molecular sub-type in question.

The statins may also interact in various ways with anti-tumor drugs, by either potentiating or diminishing their effectiveness. Elucidation of these interactions might change the choice of treatment in cancer patients as some combination therapies might be contraindicated, whereas others might elicit potentiated anti-tumor effects. A critical issue in chemoprevention is the weighing of risks versus benefits, where in one study statin-users had an increased risk for breast cancer (McDougall, et al., 2013), despite a larger body of evidence to the contrary. Thus, further studies are warranted to determine which patient groups or sub-groups could benefit from statin treatment.

Although current knowledge does not support the use of statins as anti-cancer monotherapy, supplementing current standard-of-care anti-cancer agents with statins might enhance the anti-tumor activity of different chemotherapeutic regimens. For example, statins exhibit synergistic anti-tumor effects with cisplatin (Kozar, et al., 2004), 5-fluorouracil (Agarwal, et al., 1999), doxorubicin (Feleszko, et al., 2002; Kozar, et al., 2004) and paclitaxel (Holstein & Hohl, 2001). Further research is needed in this avenue before such options can be recommended.

Supporting these observations, there is emerging evidence that statin use may lower the risk of developing various cancers (Bansal, Undela, D'Cruz, & Schifano, 2012; Bonovas, Filioussi, Flordellis, & Sitaras, 2007; P. P. Singh & S. Singh, 2013; Singh, Singh, Singh, Murad, & Iyer, 2013; Singh, Singh, Singh, Murad, & Sanchez, 2013). A recent large observational study of the Danish population showed that statin use prior to cancer diagnosis reduced cancer-related mortality up to 15% (Nielsen, Nordestgaard, & Bojesen, 2013). However, the role of statins in prolonging the survival of patients diagnosed with cancer still requires further study.

The goal of extending the scope of statins from cholesterol-lowering to cancer prevention and treatment might soon be within reach. In Table 1, some of anti-cancer effects of the various statins are summarized.

The Role of Prenyltransferases in Cancer Therapy

Difficulty in designing small GTPase inhibitors for cancer therapy (Bommi-Reddy & Kaelin, 2010), has prompted a global quest to develop FTIs and geranylgeranyltransferase (GGTase) inhibitors (GGTIs), together known as the prenyltransferase (PTase) inhibitors (PTIs), as potential anti-cancer drugs (Maynor, Scott, Rickert, & Gibbs, 2008).

The enzyme FTase is located in the cell cytosol, and it is one of the three enzymes in the PTase group that catalyzes most isoprenylation reactions. FTase adds a 15-carbon isoprenoid lipid (the farnesyl group) to proteins bearing a CAAX motif and its targets include members of the Ras superfamily of small GTP binding proteins critical to cell cycle progression. GGTase (types I and II) adds a 20-carbon isoprenoid lipid (the geranylgeranyl group) to proteins bearing a CAAX motif (for GGTase I) or a CXC motif (for GGTase II), and its targets include the Rho family GTPases.

Farnesyltransferase Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy

The FTIs comprise a novel class of anti-cancer agents recently developed to inhibit FTase with the downstream effect of preventing the proper functioning of the Ras protein, which is abnormally active in cancer (Heimbrook & Oliff, 1998; Niessner, et al., 2011). These ‘anti-Ras’ agents interrupt the crucial post-translational modification of Ras, reduce Ras function, and thus derive their potential therapeutic benefits in cancer (Niessner, et al., 2011).

Detailed information about the kinetics of the FTase reaction and the physicochemical nature of FTase substrates led to the rational design of FTIs for cancer therapy (Heimbrook & Oliff, 1998; Sebti & Hamilton, 1997). Based on their mechanism of action, existing FTIs can be divided into three categories: FPP competitive inhibitors, CAAX competitive inhibitors, and compounds that inhibit both FPP and CAAX (called “bisubstrate analogues”) (Crul, de Klerk, Beijnen, & Schellens, 2001; Wasko, Dudakovic, & Hohl, 2011).

A number of selective inhibitors have been developed in each of these categories and have undergone rigorous in vitro and in vivo testing (Ohkanda, Blaskovich, Sebti, & Hamilton, 2003; Sebti & Hamilton, 2000); and their anti-tumor outcome has been linked with pleiotropic effects on apoptosis, angiogenesis, and the cell cycle (Appels, et al., 2011).

FPP (a.k.a. farnesyl diphosphoate (FDP)) analogues were the first reported active inhibitors of FTase and were designed based on the farnesyl moiety of the FPP substrate. Animal studies did not support the use of FPP analogues as anti-tumor agents (Rowinsky, Windle, & Von Hoff, 1999). Moreover, the use of FPP inhibitors in chemotherapy raises several concerns about toxic side effects, since FPP is involved in several biological pathways including cholesterol biosynthesis (Patel, et al., 1995).

The development of peptidomimetic inhibitors began upon discovering that FTase activity can be inhibited by a tetrapeptide having the CAAX motif (Goldstein, Brown, Stradley, Reiss, & Gierasch, 1991), which resulted in the development of low molecular-weight CAAX peptidomimetics as a principal strategy for FTase inhibition (Brown, Goldstein, Paris, Burnier, & Marsters, 1992; Duque, Vidal, & Rivas, 2011).

Non-peptidomimetic inhibitors constitute a heterogeneous group of FTIs with different action profiles for each target cell type (Manne, et al., 1995). R115777 and SCH66336 are orally active non-peptidomimetics and have been used in clinical trials (Castaneda, et al., 2011). In vitro tests of human tumor cell lines show increased sensitivity to R115777 (End, et al., 2001; Epling-Burnette & Loughran, 2010). SCH66336 is a tricyclic halogenated compound and inhibits growth of several tumor cell lines as well as K-ras-transformed xenografts in vivo (Bishop, et al., 1995). BMS-214662 is a new class of non-peptide imidazole FTIs which exhibits complete tumor regression in various tumor xenograft models and has entered clinical trials.

The bisubstrate analogues combine features of FPP analogues and non-peptide CAAX peptidomimetics as FTIs and are highly potent in vitro (Manne, et al., 1995). BMS-186511 is a potent inhibitor of Ras signaling in transformed cells with minimal effects on normal cells (Manne, et al., 1995; Yan, et al., 1995).

Geranylgeranyltransferase Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy

Developing inhibitors of GGTase was not initially considered an attractive proposition because more cellular proteins undergo geranylgeranylation than farnesylation, and thus may have more toxic effects in vivo (Kazi, et al., 2009). Similar to FTIs, GGTIs have also shown encouraging results in vitro and in animal models, yet only one GGTI (GGTI-2418) is being used in a clinical trial (O’Dwyer, Gallagher, Nguyen, Waddell, & Chiorean, 2010). GGTI-298 inhibits N-Ras isoprenylation in various cancer cell lines in vitro (Lerner, et al., 1997). It reduces tumor invasiveness and decreases RhoA membrane association in variety of other cancer cell lines (Kusama, et al., 2003). By decreasing protein isoprenylation, GGTI-298 increases apoptosis in osteoclasts by affecting Rab-dependent functions such as intracellular membrane trafficking (Coxon, et al., 2001; Coxon, et al., 2000).

GGTI-298 also induces cell cycle arrest at G0/G1, which is p53-independent and is reproducible in several cancer cell lines (Adnane, Bizouarn, Qian, Hamilton, & Sebti, 1998; Vogt, Sun, Qian, Hamilton, & Sebti, 1997). Additionally, inhibition with a GGTI blocks cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase by increasing phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein in lung cancer cells (Sun, Qian, et al., 1999).

GGTI-2154 treatment for three days decreased breast tumor progression in MMTV-v-Ha-Ras transgenic mice (Sun, et al., 2003). In a mouse model of lung cancer, GGTI-297 or GGTI-2154 treatment reduced cancer development by 40 to 60%, respectively (Sun, Blaskovich, et al., 1999).

Taken together, these in vitro and animal studies demonstrate the efficacy of both GGTIs and GGTase conditional knockouts and thus support their clinical development as anti-cancer agents.

PULMONARY DISEASE

The Mevalonate Pathway and Statins in Pulmonary Disease

Pertubations in cholesterol and isoprenoid metabolism, i.e. changes to important MVA pathway metabolites affect cellular immune responses, tissue injury, chronic disease development and the manifestation of inflammatory systemic disorders (Greenwood, et al., 2006; Steinman, 2006).

A known deficiency in the human enzyme mevalonate kinase (MVAK), the first committed enzyme of cholesterol biosynthesis, produces two auto-inflammatory syndromes, mevalonate aciduria and hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome (HIDS). Mevalonate aciduria manifests as failure to thrive, psychomotor retardation, cerebellar ataxia, visual impairment, dysmorphic features and recurrent febrile crises with organomegaly, arthralgias, and skin rashes. HIDS manifests as periodic fevers and some neurologic abnormalities across a spectrum, high immunoglobulin D and autoimmune-like phenomenon (Haas & Hoffmann, 2006).

Extreme depletion of the isoprenoids and cholesterol are thought to be the underlying cause, and recent evidence indicates upregulation of NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 (NALP3) pointing to inflammasome-mediated mechanisms (Pontillo, Paoluzzi, & Crovella, 2010). A balance likely exists between extreme depletion and an overabundance of sterol and isoprenoid metabolites, both of which may lead to disturbances in normal cellular function resulting in organ dysfunction, chronic illness, and inflammation.

Given the above ‘natural’ experiment of human MVAK deficiency, and given that many lung diseases are chronic inflammatory conditions, the following two questions arise: (1) What role does MVA metabolism play in the pathogenesis of lung diseases?, and (2) How can MVA metabolism be modulated to mitigate these diseases? The sections that follow will attempt to answer the above questions critically by reviewing and interconnecting what we have learned from the existing body of literature.

By conservative estimates from the Centers for Disease Control, 32 million Americans take statins, yet relatively little is known about their effects on lungs, pulmonary physiology health and disease. Due to the complexity of the MVA pathway and off-target effects of statins, investigators across disciplines have interrogated components of the MVA cascade in the laboratory, and examined the role of statins as a therapeutic agent. In pulmonary medicine, basic investigations, epidemiologic studies, and clinical trials have been conducted to address these questions.

In this part of the review we will summarize aspects of this literature and offer ideas for future directions. We will focus on the airway diseases asthma and COPD given that the majority of work has been done in these areas. However, a growing body of literature also exists for the following lung and related diseases which we will not review here: pneumonia, acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS), pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, lung transplant and rejection, and sepsis. Of note, lung cancer is discussed in previous parts of this review.

The Mevalonate Pathway in Pulmonary Health and Disease

The MVA cascade, its isoprenoid intermediates, and downstream cholesterol biosynthesis are essential for basic cell and healthy organ function. The isprenoids FPP and GGPP are critical intermediates in the MVA cascade that modulate a diverse litany of cellular functions. They function as lipid adducts that covalently bind the small monomeric GTPases via the action of the prenyltransferases, allowing them to anchor in cell membranes for signal transduction (J. K. Liao, 2002; McTaggart, 2006; Perez-Sala, 2007).

These isoprenylated GTPases such as Ras, Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 participate in diverse immune functions (Greenwood, et al., 2006) (e.g. antigen presentation and processing, leukocyte migration, cytokine production, immune cell adhesion, etc.), the cell cycle, cytoskeletal dynamics, cell proliferation, endothelial and epithelial barrier integrity, redox balance, and inflammation (Table 2).

Table 2.

Varied Roles of Rho Signaling in Lung Biology

Cellular or Tissue Effect
Cell Growth, Death and Mobility
Cell motility/migration (Birukova, et al., 2012; Muessel, et al., 2008; Xiao, Li, & Liu, 2012).
Cell proliferation (Guilluy, et al., 2009; Takeda, et al., 2006; Vigano, et al., 1995; Watts, et al., 2006).
Cytoskeleton dynamics (Citi, Spadaro, Schneider, Stutz, & Pulimeno, 2011; Fukata, Amano, & Kaibuchi, 2001; Ivanov, et al., 2010; Jacobson, et al., 2004; Kato, Hashikabe, Iwata, Akimoto, & Hattori, 2004; Koch, Benz, Schmidt, Olenik, & Aktories, 1997).
Apoptosis (Ghavami, Mutawe, et al., 2012; Moore, et al., 2004; Shi & Wei, 2007).
Efferocytosis (Moon, et al., 2010; Morimoto, Janssen, Fessler, McPhillips, et al., 2006; Morimoto, Janssen, Fessler, Xiao, et al., 2006; Richens, et al., 2009).
Tumor cell growth and invasion (Agarwal, et al., 1999; Ahn, et al., 2007; J. Chen, et al., 2012; Koyuturk, et al., 2007; J. Zhang, et al., 2013).
Immunity
Antigen presenting/processing (Greenwood, et al., 2006).
Leukocyte transendothelial migration (Muller, 2011).
Inflammation (Chiba, Arima, Sakai, & Misawa, 2008; Greenwood, et al., 2006; Silveira, Dominical, Lazarini, Costa, & Conran, 2013; Zeki, et al., 2009).
Epithelial Biology
Epithelial-neutrophil adhesion (Yagi, et al., 2006)
Ciliogenesis (Pan, You, Huang, & Brody, 2007)
Maintenance of cell-cell contact and tight junctions (Braga & Yap, 2005; Harhaj & Antonetti, 2004; Popoff & Geny, 2009; Xiao, Qin, Ping, & Zuo, 2013).
Epithelial barrier integrity (Braga & Yap, 2005; Citi, et al., 2011).
Epithelial wound closure (Desai, et al., 2004).
Epithelial mucociliary clearance (Seminario-Vidal, et al., 2011).
Alveolar barrier function (DiPaolo & Margulies, 2012; Sawafuji, et al., 2005; Takahashi, et al., 2008).
Fibrosis
Extracellular matrix (Adiguzel, Hou, Sabatini, & Bendeck, 2013; M. Li, et al., 2008; Schaafsma, et al., 2011).
Fibrosis/collagen deposition (Jiang, et al., 2012; Ni, et al., 2013; Watts, et al., 2006; Watts & Spiteri, 2004).
Endothelial Biology
Endothelial barrier function and integrity (Aslam, et al., 2013; Birukov, 2009; Birukova, et al., 2004; Birukova, et al., 2012; Xiao, et al., 2013).
Angiogenesis (Park, et al., 2002)
Eosinophil adhesion to pulmonary endothelium (Sashio, et al., 2012)
Mesenchymal Biology
Smooth muscle cell contraction (Chiba, Nakazawa, et al., 2009; Fukata, et al., 2001; Guilluy, et al., 2009; C. Liu, et al., 2006; W. Zhang, et al., 2010).
Smooth muscle cell proliferation (Takeda, et al., 2006; Vigano, et al., 1995).
Airway smooth muscle cell contraction & bronchial hyperresponsiveness (Chiba, et al., 2008; Chiba, Nakazawa, et al., 2009; Schaafsma, Bos, et al., 2008; Schaafsma, Roscioni, Meurs, & Schmidt, 2008)
Infectious Diseases
Bacterial virulence (Boquet & Lemichez, 2003)
Viral Virulence (Dumitru, et al., 2006).
Respiratory viral infection (Dumitru, et al., 2006; Pastey, Crowe, & Graham, 1999).
Metabolic Signals
Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity (Kato, et al., 2004; Kraynack, et al., 2002; Muniyappa, Xu, Ram, & Sowers, 2000).
Redox balance (Antonopoulos, Margaritis, Shirodaria, & Antoniades, 2012; Melo, et al., 2013).

This table is not all inclusive, but it does cite the key citable references related to lung pathophysiology.

Lung resident cell function, including endothelial barrier integrity (W. Chen, Pendyala, Natarajan, Garcia, & Jacobson, 2008; Jacobson, et al., 2005), smooth muscle cell proliferation (Takeda, et al., 2006; Vigano, et al., 1995), extracellular matrix deposition (Schaafsma, et al., 2011), epithelial cell cytokine production (Iwata, et al., 2012; Murphy, et al., 2008; Sakoda, et al., 2006; W. Wang, et al., 2011; Zeki, Thai, Kenyon, & Wu, 2012), and cell fate phenomena such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, autophagy, and apoptosis (J. C. Chen, Wu, Huang, & Lin, 2008; Ghavami, et al., 2010; Ghavami, et al., 2011; Zeki, Franzi, Last, & Kenyon, 2009; J. Zhang, et al., 2013) depend on metabolites of the MVA pathway.

Cholesterol transport or efflux (rather than the absolute concentration of blood cholesterol) may be important for the proper development of lung alveoli, and abnormalities in cholesterol metabolism/transport along with Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 activation can lead to emphysema even in the absence of cigarette smoke exposure (Goldklang, et al., 2012). Cholesterol metabolites also play a role in epithelial cell differentiation. Cholesterol sulfate accumulates in epithelial cells due to increased activity of cholesterol sulfotransferase during pathological epithelial cell squamous metaplasia (Rearick, Hesterberg, & Jetten, 1987). Human bronchial myocyte proliferation is mediated by the MVA pathway isoprenoids and the Rho GTPases in particular (Takeda, et al., 2006; Vigano, et al., 1995).

Inflammatory cells involved in lung and systemic inflammation including eosinophils (Adachi, et al., 2001), neutrophils (Dunzendorfer, et al., 1997), macrophages (W. Wang, Song, Wang, Chen, & Yan, 2013), mast cells (Kagami, et al., 2008), T-cells (Ghittoni, et al., 2005; Samson, et al., 2005; Shibata, et al., 2002; Shimada, Park, & Daida, 2006; Yamashita, et al., 1999) and dendritic cells (Yilmaz, et al., 2006) are all affected by HMGCR activity and MVA pathway metabolites and/or GTPases. Even given this limited sampling of a larger body of scientific work, this evidence collectively indicates a foundational role for the MVA pathway in respiratory health and disease.

Rho GTPase in Respiratory Disease

Because Rho is expressed in all cells and is involved in numerous cellular pathways, it is a mechanism that is highly relevant to lung health and disease. The Rho family GTPases are ubiquitous molecular switches mediating a wide array of biological events (Greenwood, et al., 2006; Ridley, 2001; Wettschureck & Offermanns, 2002). This family of monomeric GTPases (a.k.a. G-proteins) has at least 20 members with many regulators and effector molecules, the most heavily studied being RhoA, Cdc42, and Rac1.

The small GTPase Rho has three isoforms, RhoA, RhoB, and RhoC (Ridley, 2001; Wheeler & Ridley, 2004); these are hydrolases that bind GTP/GDP and hydrolyze GTP to GDP to carry out their signal transduction functions within cells (Figure 3). The Rho GTPases transduce their signal via the downstream ROCK enzymes which mediate outside-to-inside cell signals. Therefore, pharmacological or biologic interference with this signaling pathway often involves Rho GTPase or ROCK inhibition or both.

Therefore, the Rho GTPase family in all, and RhoA in particular, are involved in many diverse cellular processes relevant to respiratory health and are thus deserving of further study (Etienne-Manneville & Hall, 2002) (Table 2).

Asthma

Rho GTPase has been implicated in a variety of lung specific phenomena that contribute to different pulmonary diseases. The ROCK pathway plays a critical role in asthma and in particular related to airway remodeling and hyperresponsiveness (Schaafsma, Gosens, Zaagsma, Halayko, & Meurs, 2008; Witzenrath, et al., 2008).

In animal models, RhoA modulates bronchial smooth muscle cell contraction under (Interleukin)-13 (IL13) and IL4 T-helper 2 (Th2) stimulation, a mechanism highly relevant to the pathogenesis of allergic asthma (Chiba, Nakazawa, et al., 2009). Rho GTPase mediates actin polymerization in acetylcholine-induced airway smooth muscle contraction (W. Zhang, Du, & Gunst, 2010). By a related mechanism, bronchodilators can suppress Rho activation ex vivo and thereby reduce airway muscle contraction (C. Liu, Zuo, & Janssen, 2006), while prednisolone inhibits TNFα- and IL13-induced RhoA expression in bronchial smooth muscle cells (Goto, Chiba, Sakai, & Misawa, 2010). Inactivation of RhoA by simvastatin or a geranylgeranyltransferase inhibitor (GGTI) also reduces human airway smooth muscle cell proliferation (Takeda, et al., 2006).

Geranylgeranyltransferase I (GGTase I), which geranylgeranylates Rho family GTPases, also modulates autophagy and apoptosis in human airway smooth muscle cells (Ghavami, Mutawe, et al., 2012). Pharmacological inhibition of GGTase I induces apoptosis and autophagy in these smooth muscle cells. In animal models of allergic asthma, GGTase inhibitors reduce eosinophilia and airway smooth muscle hyperresponsiveness (Chiba, Sato, Hanazaki, Sakai, & Misawa, 2009; Chiba, Sato, & Misawa, 2009a). Because smooth muscle cell hypertrophy and eosinophilic inflammation are central features of asthma, GGTIs may be an important drug to develop for the treatment of asthma.

In rodent models of allergic asthma, specific inhibition of the Rho downstream effector Rho kinase also attenuates eosinophilic inflammation, goblet cell hyperplasia, and airway hyperreactivity (AHR) (Taki, et al., 2007). Interestingly, in obese mice (leptin-deficient (ob/ob) mice), RhoA expression is increased in the airway nasal epithelium and tracheal smooth muscle compared to wild type mice (Ross, Darrah, Hodges, Lang, & Kelley, 2013). Given the role of RhoA in established models of allergic asthma, we predict that Rho mechanisms might mediate increased AHR not only in all asthma, but in particular in the human obese asthmatic.

Eosinophils are the main effector leukocyte in allergic asthma. The eosinophil chemokine eotaxin (of which three types exist: eotaxin-1,-2, and -3) stimulates ROCK activation which is necessary for eosinophil chemotaxis in vitro (Adachi, et al., 2001). Human eosinophil motility in a 3-dimentional microenvironment is also regulated by Rho GTPase (Muessel, Scott, Friedl, Bradding, & Wardlaw, 2008). Therefore, Rho signaling has implications for the persistent eosinophilia seen in more severe forms of human asthma (Coleman, et al., 2012) and for the development of new therapies that could target Rho-mediated eosinophilic inflammation.

Such insight from in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro models highlights a major role of ROCK in asthma and Th2-polarized allergic inflammation (Schaafsma, Bos, Zuidhof, Zaagsma, & Meurs, 2008). Inhibition of this pathway in animal models of asthma mitigates allergic inflammation and AHR, and is thus a promising area for further research in novel therapeutics (Schaafsma, Bos, Zuidhof, Zaagsma, & Meurs, 2006; Schaafsma, Bos, et al., 2008; Taki, et al., 2007; Witzenrath, et al., 2008).

Cigarette Smoke-Induced Lung Injury and COPD

In a mouse model of cigarette smoke (CS)-induced inflammation and apoptosis, CS impairs apoptotic cell clearance via oxidant-mediated activation of the ROCK pathway (Richens, et al., 2009). Rho GTPases are also essential molecules that differentially regulate efferocytosis (the clearance of apoptotic cells), where RhoA and Rho kinase inhibit efferocytosis, and Rac1 and Cdc42 stimulate it (Moon, Lee, Park, Chong, & Kang, 2010; Morimoto, Janssen, Fessler, McPhillips, et al., 2006; Richens, et al., 2009). Rho family GTPases such as Rac1 and Cdc42 also differentially modulate CS-induced human airway epithelial cell migration relevant to healing and carcinogenesis (L. Zhang, Gallup, Zlock, Finkbeiner, & McNamara, 2013). Thus, varied roles exist for the different Rho family GTPases warranting additional studies into the mechanisms involved in smoking-related diseases such as COPD.

Pulmonary endothelial dysfunction, based on pulmonary arterial relaxation response and vasodilatory eNOS expression, is present in smokers with normal lung function (Duong-Quy, et al., 2011). The mechanism may occur via ROCK inhibition of NO synthesis. Such a mechanism has relevance for the pathogenesis of human COPD and may be a therapeutic opportunity for drugs that inhibit the ROCK pathway in lungs (Fernandes, Henry, & Goldie, 2007).

Future research should focus on delineating the roles of RhoA, Rac1/2, and Cdc42 and Rho kinases in smoke-induced injury before specific therapies can be successfully developed.

The Airway Epithelium and Lung Inflammation

In a model of acute lung inflammation using lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) inhibited RhoA activity in alveolar macrophages and promoted neutrophil apoptotic cell clearance. A Rho kinase inhibitor mimicked the effects of NAC suggesting that Rho inhibition has a role to play in mitigating acute pulmonary inflammation (Moon, et al., 2010). However, Rho kinase inhibition with Y27632 at high doses (i.e. 100 uM) induces loss of actin stress fibers in human airway epithelial cells leading to epithelial apoptosis (Moore, Marroquin, Gugliotta, Tse, & White, 2004). Rho kinase and possibly Rho GTPase may be regulators of epithelial apoptosis, and whether this has harmful or beneficial effects on disease pathogenesis remains unknown.

Linking apoptosis to inflammation, and apoptotic epithelial cell clearance, the Rho family member protein Rac1 GTPase is necessary for normal apoptotic epithelial cell engulfment by neighboring airway epithelial cells. This is a recently described novel airway epithelial mechanism to clear dead cells and thus mitigate Th2 inflammation in asthma (Juncadella, et al., 2013; Lambrecht & Hammad, 2013). This suggests that at least in the case of Rac1, its inhibition could have potential adverse consequences in allergic asthma, further adding to the complex and interconnected role that Rho family GTPases play in lung health and disease (Henson & Bratton, 2013).

Also relevant to asthma, rhinovirus infection activates p38-MAPK via membrane lipid rafts and RhoA suggesting that RhoA inhibition could mitigate epithelial cell viral infection (Dumitru, Dreschers, & Gulbins, 2006). Relevant to both innate and adaptive immune responses in primary human small airway epithelial cells, RhoA GTPase is activated by Toll-like receptors (TLR)-2 and -3 leading to Src and NF-kB signaling, where RhoA is required for NF-kB activation (Manukyan, Nalbant, Luxen, Hahn, & Knaus, 2009).

Conversely, in macrophages, inhibition of the Rho family GTPases (RhoA, Cdc42, Rac1) increases TNFα production after LPS exposure indicating a potentially negative role for Rho inhibition (Monick, Powers, Butler, & Hunninghake, 2003). It is probable that Rho GTPase has dual and paradoxical effects depending on the inhibitor dose used and cell type in question, or inhibitor effects on other Rho GTPases such as Rac (Boulter, Estrach, Garcia-Mata, & Feral, 2012; Boulter, et al., 2010).

The Rho GTPase/Rho kinase pathway also modulates NOS2 expression in human alveolar epithelial cells (A549). In A549 cells, mevastatin increases cytokine-induced activation of the NOS2 promoter in a GGPP-dependent fashion, thereby highlighting the involvement of Rho in NO lung biology (Kraynack, Corey, Elmer, & Kelley, 2002). In in vitro models of cystic fibrosis (CF) epithelium, Rho GTPase inhibition with mevastatin restores NOS2 expression, which is thought to be lacking in human CF and a contributor to severe inflammation (Kreiselmeier, Kraynack, Corey, & Kelley, 2003).

Epithelial Barrier and Healing

The various Rho family GTPases interact in complex ways to maintain barrier function via epithelial tight junctions (Braga & Yap, 2005; Harhaj & Antonetti, 2004; Ivanov, Parkos, & Nusrat, 2010). Maintenance or increase in epithelial cell-cell contact, induced by microtubule depolymerization, depends on ROCK pathway signaling. However, Rac1 GTPase opposes this pathway, where inhibition of Rac1 signaling promotes epithelial barrier function as measured by transepithelial resistance (Lorenowicz, et al., 2007). Conversely, in human airway epithelial cells, the EGF receptor (EGFR) promotes permeability barrier development and function through Rac1 GTPase (Terakado, et al., 2011).

RhoA GTPase and its downstream effector molecule Rho kinase both suppress airway epithelial wound healing via a mechanism involving microtubule depolymerization (Desai, Aryal, Ceacareanu, Hassid, & Waters, 2004), suggesting that Rho inhibition or modulation of some kind could benefit epithelial healing and wound closure relevant to asthma and COPD. Given that the airway epithelium holds center stage in current thinking, this becomes a very important question for the development of novel and airway-targeted therapies.

We speculate that the dose of ROCK inhibitor(s) has opposite effects depending on drug concentration and possibly the cell type studied. In the case of Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632, lower doses (≤ 0.5 uM) promote airway epithelial wound healing, whereas higher doses (≥ 10 uM) do not have this benefit and may achieve the opposite (Desai, et al., 2004). Such contradictory results may be due to differences in inhibitor dose and type, experimental design and/or epithelial cell type, however, it may also be due to the complex crosstalk between all the Rho GTPases and the effect of RhoGDI1 protein, a dissociation inhibitor that keeps Rho in the cytosol and in the inactive state (Boulter, et al., 2010).

Pulmonary Hypertension

Downstream of RhoA GTPase is the Rho kinase signaling pathway, and these work in concert to execute cell signal transduction. In pulmonary hypertension, this signaling cascade plays an important role in disease pathogenesis. Thus, the ROCK inhibitors have been proposed as a potential treatment for pulmonary hypertension (Duong-Quy, Bei, Liu, & Dinh-Xuan, 2013; Oka, Fagan, Jones, & McMurtry, 2008).

Several different mechanisms in pulmonary hypertension are interconnected to Rho signaling, of which we highlight only a few. In mice, protein kinase G (PKG-I) deficiency causes pulmonary hypertension through activation of the ROCK pathway to induce vasoconstriction and pulmonary vascular remodeling (Zhao, et al., 2012). In primary cultured pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells as a model of pulmonary vascular remodeling, ROCK signaling mediates endothelin-1-induced MMP-2 expression (M. Li, Li, & Sun, 2008). In murine pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells, endothelin-1 also acts via Rho kinase to alter pH homeostasis leading to pulmonary arterial hypertension (Undem, Rios, Maylor, & Shimoda, 2012).

In pulmonary artery fibroblasts, hypoxia induces Rac1-p38 MAPK-dependent proliferation and mitogen release. Low-dose fluvastatin (1 uM) inhibits hypoxia-induced adventitial fibroblast proliferation and mitogen release. The Rac1 guanine exchange factor inhibitor NSC-23766 mimicked the observed beneficial statin effect (Carlin, et al., 2012; Carlin, Peacock, & Welsh, 2007). Given this statin-sensitive mechanism, fluvastatin or Rac1 inhibitors may have therapeutic potential in pulmonary hypertension.

In human idiopathic pulmonary hypertension, ROCK activities are increased along with increased RhoA serotonylation, and this pathway is involved in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell contraction and proliferation (Guilluy, et al., 2009). Both inhibitors of ROCK attenuate the prolonged vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling seen in pulmonary hypertension.

Pulmonary Fibrosis

In pulmonary fibrosis, fibroblast proliferation/turn-over involves cell cycle protein cyclin D1 and is over-expressed in the lungs of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This dysregulation in IPF occurs by a RhoA-dependent mechanism that mediates lung fibroblast proliferation (Watts, Cottrell, Hoban, & Spiteri, 2006).

Hyperoxia also induces RhoA activation in lung fibroblasts and mediates collagen synthesis/deposition. In oxygen-induced lung fibrosis, the ROCK pathway mediates myofibroblast transformation and collagen synthesis (Ni, Dong, Han, Kondrikov, & Su, 2013). In a mouse model of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis, Rho kinase inhibition with fasudil attenuates these fibrotic changes (Jiang, et al., 2012).

Rho signaling also mediates profibrotic pathways involving connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) in human lung fibroblasts, a process inhibited by simvastatin (Watts & Spiteri, 2004). This in turn has therapeutic implications not only for Rho inhibition but also for statins in the treatment of fibrotic lung diseases.

Endothelial Barrier Integrity

Human pulmonary artery endothelial cell barrier integrity is modulated by Rho family GTPases RhoA and Rac1 (Birukova, et al., 2004). Specifically, inhibition of RhoA and Rac1 membrane localization by simvastatin enhances endothelial barrier integrity in the lung (W. Chen, et al., 2008; Jacobson, 2009). In an earlier study by the same group, simvastatin improved barrier protection but increased the amount of GTP-bound Rac (Jacobson, et al., 2004). In neither study did the authors evaluate both GTP-binding status and membrane/cytosol location, or GTPase activity.

These findings may not be contradictory if under certain circumstances statin can increase the cytosolic fraction of GTP-bound Rac via effects on guanine dissociation inhibitors (GDIs), guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs), the proteins that co-regulate GTPase function and intracellular location (Boulter, et al., 2010; Turner, Zhuang, Zhang, Boss, & Pilz, 2008).

Thus, it may be that both over-activation and inhibition (Lu, et al., 2011) of these GTPases play important roles in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) and/or severe pneumonia (Jacobson, et al., 2005). The challenge is the proper accounting of GTPase location, activity, and induction of downstream signals that confirms true Rho activation.

The Statins as Therapeutic Agents in Pulmonary Diseases

Asthma – the basic science

The first study to show that statins have an anti-inflammatory effect in allergic asthma was by McKay et al. These authors showed that systemic treatment with simvastatin in ovalbumin (OVA)-allergic BALB/c mice reduced total and eosinophil cell counts, reduced IL4 and IL5 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and attenuated histologic evidence of airway/lung inflammation (McKay, Leung, McInnes, Thomson, & Liew, 2004).

Since then multiple animal studies have confirmed and further expanded these findings using different statins besides simvastatin including pravastatin, atorvastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin (Chiba, Sato, & Misawa, 2009b; C. F. Huang, et al., 2013; Imamura, et al., 2009; D. Y. Kim, Ryu, Lim, Lee, & Ro, 2007; Zeki, et al., 2009; Zhu, et al., 2012).

Statins also inhibit airway smooth muscle cell proliferation (Takeda, et al., 2006; Vigano, et al., 1995) and inducible mitogenic responses to contractile agents (Capra & Rovati, 2013) relevant to airway remodeling. Adverse airway remodeling leads to fixed airflow obstruction in asthma and has no effective current treatment. Therefore, the statins and other inhibitors of the MVA pathway, including isoprenylation inhibitors (e.g. FTIs and GGTIs (Figure 2)), may be promising agents for the treatment of severe asthma or prevention of irreversible airway remodeling.

Ex vivo studies also indicate the key role that protein isoprenylation plays in mediating LPS-induced contractile responses in human airways (Cazzola, et al., 2011). Simvastatin and the Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632 both abolish airway bronchoconstriction further supporting their potential therapeutic role in treating AHR.

In cultured primary human airway smooth muscle cells and human airway fibroblasts, simvastatin has pro-apoptotic properties. Statins could potentially abolish the smooth muscle cell hypertrophy and hyperplasia that leads to airway remodeling and subsequent chronic airflow obstruction (Ghavami, et al., 2010; Ghavami, et al., 2011). Long term human clinical trials are needed to test this hypothesis in order to assess the clinical impact of these agents.

Of interest, dietary cholesterol enhances OVA-induced eosinophilic inflammation, and independently in the same model pravastatin treatment markedly attenuates OVA-induced allergic inflammation (Yeh & Huang, 2004). The mechanism of this anti-eosinophilic effect is thought to be mediated by the MVA pathway, where MVA+simvastatin co-treatment abolishes the anti-inflammatory effect of simvastatin suggesting that HMGCR, at least partially, mediates allergic inflammation (Zeki, et al., 2009). Statins also inhibit the growth and IgE-dependent histamine release of human lung mast cells in a MVA-dependent fashion (Krauth, et al., 2006). Given that HMGCR is the rate-limiting step for cholesterol biosynthesis in the MVA pathway, these studies highlight the importance of metabolic pathways in allergic lung disease.

Also, statins inhibit the growth and IgE-dependent histamine release of human lung mast cells in a MVA-dependent fashion (Krauth, et al., 2006). The role of cholesterol and lipoproteins in asthma and other lung diseases, and their effects on pulmonary immune responses is an active area of current research (Gowdy & Fessler, 2013; Zeki, et al., 2011). Cholesterol and the non-sterol isoprenoids of the MVA pathway also likely alter the function of lung resident cells.

The L-arginine/arginase/nitric oxide synthase (NOS) pathway plays a critical role in both human and murine asthma (Bratt, Zeki, Last, & Kenyon, 2011; Holguin, et al., 2013; Morris, et al., 2004). Increased arginase activity contributes to airway remodeling, depletes L-arginine which reduces local lung levels of nitric oxide (NO), and thereby contributes to AHR and asthma symptoms.

In an acute model of OVA-induced allergic asthma, systemic treatment with simvastatin decreases lung arginase-1 protein expression and enzyme activity, while also mitigating markers of airway remodeling such as goblet cell hyperplasia/metaplasia (Zeki, Bratt, Rabowsky, Last, & Kenyon, 2010). In acute and chronic mouse models of allergic asthma, systemic treatment with simvastatin improves dysfunctional nitric oxide metabolism in bronchial epithelial cells and mouse lungs. It also mitigates allergic inflammation, AHR, and airway remodeling; and reduces asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), oxo-nitrative stress, apoptosis, and epithelial injury (Ahmad, et al., 2011).

Thus, while it is important to develop novel inhibitors of the arginase enzyme, statins may serve as a readily available, but safe alternative to be used in sub-phenotypes of asthma where arginase may be playing a major role in pathogenesis (Holguin, et al., 2013).

Although much work has been done to show statins’ anti-Th2 effects in allergic mouse models of asthma, these drugs can also modulate Th1 (Samson, et al., 2006), Th17 (Imamura, et al., 2009; Maneechotesuwan, Ekjiratrakul, Kasetsinsombat, Wongkajornsilp, & Barnes, 2010), and T regulatory cell (Maneechotesuwan, et al., 2010) responses in animal models and cell culture systems relevant to asthma. This immunomodulatory repertoire (Greenwood, et al., 2006) becomes increasingly important in sub-phenotypes of asthma where current therapies are lacking, in particular in severe asthma which is typically corticosteroid-resistant, manifesting neutrophillic- rather than eosinophilic-predominant airway inflammation. Lovastatin in particular has anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving effects in acutely inflamed lungs and airways. By increasing the generation of the pro-resolving mediator 15-epi-lipoxin A4 (15-epi-LXA4), lovastatin decreases human leukocyte-airway mucosal injury (Planaguma, et al., 2010).

Because statins appear to have both systemic and local tissue effects, there may be benefits to administering statins via the inhaled route instead of or in addition to the standard oral route. Direct application of simvastatin onto Calu-3 cells (grown under air-liquid interface conditions to induce mucus production) significantly reduces mucus production (Marin, et al., 2013). However, there is also evidence of cytotoxicity with reductions in epithelial barrier integrity and loss of viability (Marin, et al., 2013), indicating that optimal dosing studies are needed before statins can be safely given to humans via the inhaled route.

However, simvastatin given via inhalation and intratracheal (i.t.) instillation using OVA-allergic mice, significantly reduces airway inflammation and eosinophilia, goblet cell hyperplasia, submucosal collagen deposition, while simultaneously reducing airway resistance and improving dynamic lung compliance (L. Xu, et al., 2012). Interestingly, low-dose inhaled (5 mg/mL) and i.t. (2 mg/kg) simvastatin are as potent as dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) given intraperitoneally (i.p.) on reducing BALF total cell numbers and eosinophils.

This raises the possibility that lung- or airway-targeted approaches for statin delivery might be an important area for innovation in the treatment of asthma. Inhaled statins, therefore, have the potential to become a new class of inhaler drugs for the treatment of asthma.

Asthma – the clinical science

Several investigators have called attention to the importance of studying statins in human respiratory diseases (E. Hothersall, McSharry, & Thomson, 2006) and in particular the most common airway diseases asthma (Camoretti-Mercado, 2009; Yuan, et al., 2012; Zeki, et al., 2011) and COPD (Janda, Park, FitzGerald, Etminan, & Swiston, 2009; Mancini, 2007; Young, Hopkins, & Eaton, 2009b). Several large epidemiological studies have revealed a protective statin effect on exacerbations and lung function (Alexeeff, Litonjua, Sparrow, Vokonas, & Schwartz, 2007; Huang, et al., 2011; Lokhandwala, West-Strum, Banahan, Bentley, & Yang, 2012).

Most recently, two large epidemiologic observational studies suggest that long-term use of statins has benefits in asthma. In the first study by Tse et al., statin use and exacerbations were assessed over a 24-month period in 14,566 statin users. They reported that statin exposure was associated with decreased odds of having asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.77, p<0.0001), and two or more dispensing of oral corticosteroids (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81–0.99, p=0.04) (Tse, Li, et al., 2013).

In the second study by Tse et al., statin use and asthma-related ED visits and/or hospitalizations were assessed over a 12-month period and stratified by ICS use (3,747 ICS users and 2,905 non-ICS users). They found similar results to their first study. Among ICS users, statin use was significantly associated with decreased odds of asthma-related ED visits (OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.94, p=0.008), but not with asthma-related hospitalizations (OR=1.09, 95% CI 0.92–1.30, p=0.31). No significant associations were found among non-ICS users (Tse, Charland, et al., 2013).

These studies indicate that long-term statin use may have benefit even in ICS users, and could reduce acute exacerbations of asthma. Despite a number of large studies with positive outcomes, most of these have been observational and a call for additional prospective studies remains (Silva, Couto, Delgado, & Moreira, 2012).

To date, several randomized clinical trials in patients with mild or moderate allergic asthma have failed to show a consistent and significant clinical benefit to statins (Braganza, et al., 2011; Cowan, Cowan, Palmay, Williamson, & Taylor, 2010; E. J. Hothersall, et al., 2008; Maneechotesuwan, et al., 2010; Menzies, et al., 2007). However, these studies had several limitations including short duration (≤ 4 to 8 weeks maximum), varied statin drug choice and doses, and lack of robust hard clinical endpoints such as acute exacerbations, emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations.

Interestingly, some of the trials did consistently show that statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin) exert anti-inflammatory effects by reducing sputum inflammatory cell counts (eosinophils, macrophages) and other markers of inflammation (e.g. leukotriene B4 (LTB4)). In two studies, adding simvastatin to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) further reduces sputum %eosinophil counts beyond the ICS alone (sputum % eosinophils: 9.9% vs. 22.7% (p=0.047) (Cowan, et al., 2010), and for Δ sputum eosinophils (%): ~ −5 vs. −10% (p=0.02) (Maneechotesuwan, et al., 2010).These statin effects on human airway eosinophilia were also observed in several murine models of asthma (Imamura, et al., 2009; D. Y. Kim, et al., 2007; McKay, et al., 2004; Zeki, et al., 2009).

One possible mechanism for this anti-eosinophilic statin effect is the inhibition of eosinophil adhesion to inter-cellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 under conditions of physiologic shear stress (Robinson, et al., 2009). This in turn would reduce bronchial influx of eosinophils during acute allergic airway inflammation and provides a unique mechanism different from that of ICS.

In two of these clinical trials, statin use resulted in some mild clinical improvements, but the short duration of these studies (≥ 4 and/or 8 weeks) could not answer the question of whether statins could have greater clinical benefits over a longer period of use. Cowan et al. showed that simvastatin in atopic asthmatics with sputum eosinophilia had no corticosteroid-sparing effects. However, in asthmatics tapered off of their inhaled fluticasone, simvastatin use improved symptom scores (Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)), increased FEV1, and reduced sputum eosinophils compared to placebo (Cowan, et al., 2010). Braganza et al. showed that atorvastatin treatment over 4 and 8 weeks in smokers with mild-to-moderate asthma did not alter lung function (i.e. morning peak expiratory flow), but did improve asthma quality of life (Braganza, et al., 2011).

These studies suggest that there may be a role for statins as an adjunctive therapy in asthma; however, it remains unclear for which sub-phenotype of asthma statins would work best. Severe asthma has some features similar to COPD including neutrophilic inflammation, fixed airflow obstruction, and steroid resistance. Given what we know about statins and COPD, patients with severe asthma may be a population worthy of further study. Although no clinical trials have been reported in this population, a recent observational study indicates that obese severe asthmatics using statins for a median of one year have better control of asthma symptoms (Zeki, et al., 2013).

COPD – the basic science

As the interest in statins and COPD increased in the clinical arena, a multitude of basic science work emerged to explore mechanisms of action. Both animal models and in vitro cell culture work have demonstrated the anti-inflammatory, anti-proliferative, and anti-fibrotic effects of statins and other modulators of the MVA cascade such as the prenyltransferase inhibitors.

Animal models of COPD and emphysema have demonstrated at least a partial benefit to treatment with statins. In a guinea pig model of cigarette smoke-induced COPD, simvastatin (50 mg/kg) was started 3 months after smoke exposure, and continued for another 3 months to complete a 6 month experiment modeling chronic disease. Early (within 4 weeks) effects of simvastatin include reversal of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Simvastatin also ameliorated pulmonary arterial remodeling and emphysema at 6 months, and partially reversed smoke-induced loss of vascular nitric oxide generation. However, statin treatment did not prevent small airway remodeling as measured by airway wall area, collagen deposition, and elastin content (Wright, et al., 2011).

In a rat model of cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and pulmonary hypertension, simvastatin administered orally (5 mg/kg) for 16 weeks ameliorates the development of emphysema, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary vascular remodeling, and reduces peribronchial and perivascular inflammation and the induction of MMP-9 activity in lungs (J. H. Lee, et al., 2005). Furthermore in another study using rat alveolar macrophages, simvastatin inhibits cigarette smoke extract-mediated MMP-9 induction by blocking Ras isoprenylation and downstream NF-kB activation (S. E. Kim, et al., 2009).

In mice, systemic treatment with simvastatin (20 ug/200 ul i.p.) for 3 weeks, prevents the development of elastase-induced lung emphysema, reduces neutrophilic inflammation, and promotes alveolar cell proliferation and regeneration (Takahashi, et al., 2008).

Using spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats, simvastatin (20 mg/kg i.p.) given 1 week pre-treatment before and during 3 days of cigarette smoke exposure prevents smoke-induced leukocyte bronchial influx and bronchial epithelial sloughing (Davis, et al., 2012). This study suggests that statins may have a preventative effect or immune priming effect that pre-conditions a less injurious host response to cigarette smoke, in addition to a possible direct epithelial cytoprotective effect. The clinical implications of this observation is the public health impact statins could have, especially given that COPD is decades in the making.

The statins not only have systemic immune effects, but cell specific phenomena appear to occur as well. One important pathologic process in COPD is the accumulation of apoptotic cells and ineffective efferocytosis, i.e. the phagocytosis of dead cells and debris, or clearance of apoptotic cells that is carried out by macrophages (Krysko, Vandenabeele, Krysko, & Bachert, 2010; Morimoto, Janssen, Fessler, McPhillips, et al., 2006; Morimoto, Janssen, Fessler, Xiao, et al., 2006). As discussed above, Rho GTPases are essential regulators of this response, where statins directly enhance efferocytosis. Lovastatin for example enhances efferocytosis in a MVA- or HMGCR-dependent manner in human primary and alveolar macrophages taken from patients with COPD, and in mouse lungs (Morimoto, Janssen, Fessler, McPhillips, et al., 2006).

Excess mucus production is a key feature of both asthma and COPD. There are many factors that trigger and regulate mucin production in airway epithelial cells ranging from environmental aeroallergens to smoke to infectious agents.

In a MVA-dependent manner, simvastatin attenuates acrolein-induced goblet cell hyperplasia and metaplasia in airways and inhibits the expression of Muc5AC at both the mRNA and protein levels (Y. J. Chen, et al., 2010). In an in vitro model using Calu-3 epithelial cells grown under air liquid interface conditions, simvastatin treatment for 14 days causes a significant inhibition in mucus production (Marin, et al., 2013). Although these are not primary bronchial epithelial cells, it does confirm prior in vivo data from murine models (using various noxious stimuli) which show a reduction in goblet cell metaplasia.

In a related fashion, small airway remodeling is a key hallmark of COPD (Hogg, et al., 2004). In a rat model of cigarette smoke-induced small airway remodeling, simvastatin treatment for 16 weeks attenuates small airway wall thickening, and prevents markers of airway fibrosis (hydroxyproline and collagen deposition). Statin treatment also down-regulates TGFβ1 and CTGF and the SMAD2/3 signaling molecules, while also reducing TNFα levels in BALF (Ou, et al., 2009).

As adverse structural remodeling contributes to chronic airflow obstruction, we speculate that long-term statin treatment could improve lung function and functional capacity in patients with COPD.

Statin effects on the airway epithelium have also been reported. The airway epithelium (or mucosa) is the initial site of contact with environmental insults, and thus is a key modulator of inflammation and remodeling signals in asthma and COPD. The epithelial mucosal immune response and its barrier functions are central to allergic, infectious, and smoke-induced lung diseases. Th2-mediated bronchial inflammation is also important in COPD with features of atopy.

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), a hub cytokine that stimulates Th2 inflammation, is over-produced in viral stimulated bronchial epithelial cells procured from patients with COPD. Simvastatin can selectively inhibit dsRNA-induced IRF3 activation and production of TSLP and IFNβ in these epithelial cells (Brandelius, et al., 2013). Because viral infections are thought to be one mechanism that induces acute exacerbations in asthma and COPD, statins may serve to mitigate exacerbations by this mechanism.

Several different authors using a mixture of primary epithelial cells and cell lines have shown a beneficial statin effect by reducing the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Although this can apply to many diseases beyond COPD, it remains highly pertinent to the current discussion. The underlying presumption based on clinical studies is that prolonged expression of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic signals mediates chronic airway injury and therefore disease (Barnes, 2006, 2008).

In one of the earliest studies using the KB human epithelial cell line, simvastatin mitigated IL1α-induced IL6 and IL8 expression by a MVA- and GGPP-dependent mechanism (Sakoda, et al., 2006). Sakoda et al. further showed that simvastatin reduces NF-κB and AP-1 promoter activity and dominant-negative Rac1 also inhibits IL1α-induced NF-κB and AP-1 promoter activity (Sakoda, et al., 2006). These data indicate that Rac1 GTPase mediates inflammatory signals in human epithelial cells.

Using LPS-stimulated human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B), pitavastatin and pravastatin inhibit IL6, IL8 and GM-CSF mRNA expression and their protein translation in a MVA-dependent manner (Iwata, et al., 2012). Atorvastatin inhibits CRP expression (Xing, et al., 2011) and LPS-induced COX-2 expression and subsequent prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production (Wu, et al., 2005) in A549 human alveolar epithelial cells.

Using primary bronchial epithelial cells derived from stable lung allografts, simvastatin inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines important in neutrophilic inflammation and remodeling, namely basal and IL17- and/or TGFβ-induced IL6, IL8, GM-CSF, MMP-2 and MMP-9 (Murphy, et al., 2008). However, while atorvastatin inhibits particulate matter (PM)10-induced cytokine production (e.g. IL1β, IL8, GM-CSF, IL6, TNFα) in human alveolar macrophages, it does not do the same in human bronchial epithelial cells (Sakamoto, et al., 2009).

We speculate that this lack of effect in epithelial cells could be due to the relatively lower statin dose (nanomolar range rather than typical micromolar range used in other studies), different cell type (normal donors rather than donors with COPD), or different mechanisms involving PM10.

However, in another study, statin-users were reported to have reduced expression of Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand (CCL) 5 (CCL5), CCL11, IL5, IL13 and IL13RA1 in their nasal mucosal tissue (W. Wang, et al., 2011). Furthermore, PM induces CCL5, CCL11 and IL13RA1 in vitro and treatment with a statin reduces their mRNA expression in human primary nasal epithelial cells.

Oxidized-LDL is known to play an important role in impaired surfactant protein metabolism. In a MVA-dependent manner, simvastatin inhibits oxidized-LDL-induced TGFβ1 production in A549 cells by a mechanism that involves the Ras/ERK pathway (Guo, et al., 2012). This suggests a possible link between airway cholesterol metabolism/transport and inflammation.

Interestingly, 25- and 27-hydroxycholesterol (HC) are increased in the airways/lungs of COPD patients and may have a pro-inflammatory role in airway epithelial cells mediating innate immune responses and neutrophilic inflammation (Kikuchi, et al., 2012; Koarai, et al., 2012; Sugiura, et al., 2012). In vitro studies using human fetal lung fibroblasts (HFL-1) suggest that 25-HC also promotes fibroblast mediated tissue remodeling, by increasing α-smooth muscle actin, collagen I, MMP-2, MMP-9, and TGFβ1, via a NF-κB signaling mechanism (Ichikawa, et al., 2013). In primary human airway epithelial cells, 25-HC enhances IL6 and IL8 release after stimulation of TLR3 and may therefore potentiate the innate immune response in chronic airway diseases (Koarai, et al., 2012).

Pertinent to both pneumonia and COPD, persistent neutrophilic inflammation incurs severe injury to lungs and airways. In both primary human bronchial epithelial cells and mouse lungs, simvastatin (30 ug/30 uL) suppresses polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid (poly I:C)-induced RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) production and neutrophilia (C. S. Lee, et al., 2013). One mechanism of the protective statin effect at the mucosal level involves the pro-resolving mediator 15-epi-lipoxin A4 (15-epi-LXA4). Lovastatin decreases acute airway mucosal total and neutrophilic inflammation by increasing the production of 15-epi-LXA4 in vivo (Planaguma, et al., 2010). This suggests that at least one mechanism whereby statins afford mucosal protection is by inducing pro-resolving endogenous mediators during human leukocyte-airway epithelial interactions.

Despite these promising results, statins have the potential to be cytotoxic at higher doses (i.e. > 10 to 20 uM range). Thus, given that the majority of these studies did not account or control for this factor, much of the in vitro work mentioned above may be open to criticism. In vitro studies in particular should report cell viability assays to determine whether statin treatment is cytotoxic at the pharmacologic dose and treatment duration used to evaluate their outcome of interest.

Therefore, we urge investigators and readers to consider the understudied and potential harmful effects of statins on airway epithelial and other lung resident cells. Detailed studies are therefore needed to hone the optimal experimental conditions using appropriate animal and cell culture models.

COPD – the clinical science

Much interest has been focused recently on COPD with respect to cardiovascular drug effects (Marin, Colombo, Bebawy, Young, & Traini, 2011; Mortensen, et al., 2009; Sheng, Murphy, MacDonald, Schembri, et al., 2012) including statins, because it has long been appreciated that patients with COPD have a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis (Rennard, 2005; Sin & Man, 2003). Coronary artery disease, in particular, is prevalent and under-diagnosed in patients with advanced lung diseases including COPD (Reed, et al., 2012).

Risk stratification including odds of death in patients with COPD is improved by the addition of cardiovascular event risk scores to lung function data. This allows for more accurate predictions of long-term survival in COPD (H. M. Lee, et al., 2012). In addition, elevated plasma CRP, fibrinogen, and leukocyte count is associated with a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of major co-morbidities in COPD including myocardial infarction, heart failure, diabetes, pneumonia, and lung cancer (Thomsen, Dahl, Lange, Vestbo, & Nordestgaard, 2012).

As in asthma, statin use in patients with COPD has been associated with improved clinical outcomes in several epidemiologic studies (Dobler, Wong, & Marks, 2009; Janda, et al., 2009; Young, et al., 2009b). The statins have also garnered special attention in COPD because of their pleiotropic pharmacological effects and potential as anti-inflammatory, anti-remodeling, and anti-cancer agents in COPD (Young, Hopkins, & Eaton, 2009a).

Thus, statins have been associated with three main improvements with respect to COPD: reduction in acute exacerbations, improvement in lung function, and decrease in mortality.

In smokers, ex-smokers and in those with obstructive and restrictive pulmonary deficits who use a statin have a significantly lower decline in lung function as measured by FEV1 (−0.005 ± 0.20 L/yr vs. 0.085 ± 0.17 L/yr, p <0.0001) and FVC (−0.046 ± 0.45 L/yr vs. 0.135 ± 0.32 L/yr, p < 0.0001), compared to their respective controls (Keddissi, et al., 2007). Interestingly, patients with obstructive physiology had a lower incidence of respiratory related urgent care visits favoring statin users (0.12 ± 0.29/patient-years vs. 0.19 ± 0.32/patient-years; p=0.02).

In the VA Normative Study, Alexeef et al. studied 803 elderly men with chronic bronchitis, asthma or emphysema and also reported a marked reduction in lung function (FEV1, FVC) decline over 10 years even after controlling for known potential confounders and the healthy user effect (Alexeeff, et al., 2007).

In large cohorts of patients with COPD, statin use is associated with less acute exacerbations and hospitalizations (Huang, et al., 2011). The use of statins in patients hospitalized for an acute COPD exacerbation is associated with a lower number of and risk of acute COPD exacerbations after 1 year follow-up ((HR: 0.656 (95% CI: 0.454–0.946); p=0.024)) (Bartziokas, et al., 2011). In 1,085 subjects (292 on statins and 793 not on statins) as part of the COPDGene Study, statin use is associated with improved lower airway luminal area and with reduced exacerbations over 12 months (0.40±0.94 vs. 0.56±1.14, p=0.03) (Bartziokas, et al., 2011). Similarly, in a retrospective cohort study in patients with COPD exacerbations with 1 year follow-up, statin use is associated with a lower incidence of both acute exacerbations and endotracheal intubations (Blamoun, et al., 2008).

Statin and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use is associated with significant reductions in COPD hospitalizations (Mancini, et al., 2006) and mortality in subjects hospitalized for COPD exacerbation (Frost, Petersen, Tollestrup, & Skipper, 2007; Mancini, et al., 2006; Mortensen, et al., 2009). In COPD, statins also protect against cardiovascular events and mortality when done as secondary prevention of known cardiovascular disease (Sheng, Murphy, MacDonald, Schembri, et al., 2012). Statin consumption is also associated with reductions in all-cause mortality in COPD in both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (Sheng, Murphy, MacDonald, & Wei, 2012).

In a large retrospective study of 854 patients with COPD exacerbation, statin administration was associated with improved survival, where concomitant use of ICS increased the survival benefit associated with statins (with the following hazard ratios: 0.75 (0.58–0.98) for ICS only; 0.69 (0.36–1.3) for statins only; and 0.39 (0.22–0.67) for combined ICS and statin treatment compared to no such treatment) (Soyseth, Brekke, Smith, & Omland, 2007).

A recent study of 1,687 patients with COPD showed that statin use is associated with a 30% reduction in all-cause mortality over 4 years, independent of prior history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus (Lawes, et al., 2012). Long-term statin use (>2 years) is associated with a 39% decrease of death in patients with COPD. Impressively, if stratified by the level of systemic inflammation (according to serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels), statin use was associated a 78% reduction in mortality if the high sensitivity (hs)-CRP level is >3 mg/L, versus a non-significant 21% reduction in mortality if hsCRP ≤ 3 mg/L (Lahousse, et al., 2013).

Fibrin clots in COPD are denser, more resistant to lysis, and contribute to overall vascular dysfunction, but statins mitigate this COPD pathology (Undas, et al., 2009). This suggests that IL6-mediated systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction likely play a role via a confluence of factors involving decrement in lung function, acute exacerbations, and cardiovascular dysfunction all leading to poor outcomes in COPD.

Because statins are known to mitigate cardiovascular events and particularly in patients with high CRP (Ridker, et al., 2008a), they could have benefits in COPD by decreasing inflammation and endovascular dysfunction. However, growing evidence from animal and in vitro studies indicate that statins may also have direct effects on lung resident cells (W. Chen, et al., 2008; Davis, et al., 2012; Ghavami, et al., 2010; Ghavami, et al., 2011; Iwata, et al., 2012; M. Li, et al., 2008; Marin, et al., 2013; Murphy, et al., 2008; Schaafsma, et al., 2011; Zeki, et al., 2012).

In another study evaluating cancer in patients with COPD, statin use is associated with a reduced risk of extrapulmonary cancer mortality (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.99) (van Gestel, et al., 2009). Mortality from COPD and mortality from influenza/pneumonia was reduced in patients who used ≥ 4mg/day of a statin, where the odds ratio (OR) of death was much lower in the COPD group (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.42) than in influenza/pneumonia group (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.81) (Frost, et al., 2007).

The statin benefit also crosses ethnic differences, where a large population-based study in Japan found results similar to the aforementioned studies. Statin consumption was associated with a significant reduction in COPD-related mortality, pneumonia, and all-cause mortality, but no differences in the number of malignancies (Ishida, et al., 2007).

In another Japanese cross-sectional study (853 patients; over age 40 including never smokers, current smokers, and past smokers), statin administration was associated with a 5-fold lower risk of having airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC <70%) compared to non-users (Bando, et al., 2012). There were no statistically significant changes in smoking status and statin use. This is an important study because it was not done in established COPD. Rather, it was part of a COPD screening study for patients who visited their primary care provider. This suggests that statin use may have a protective mechanism in preventing the development of obstructive lung diseases such as COPD.

Similarly, a Taiwanese nationwide retrospective nested case-control study of 14,316 COPD patients showed that statin use was associated with at least a 30% reduced risk of acute exacerbations, and this risk reduction was dose-dependent achieving greater benefit with higher statin doses (M. T. Wang, et al., 2013). Clinical trials evaluating both the preventative and treatment potential of statins in COPD are therefore warranted.

Systemic inflammation is a major contributing factor in COPD (Agusti & Faner, 2012; Walter, et al., 2008). Emerging evidence indicates that systemic inflammation in COPD, and higher levels of serum CRP in particular, predict worse lung function and higher mortality in COPD providing incremental prognostic information (Mancini, et al., 2006). Systemic inflammation is particularly important given the known interface between cardiovascular disease, endothelial dysfunction, and airway disease. In essence, therapies that mitigate systemic inflammation may in turn help treat COPD. In the case of statins, they are known inhibitors of serum CRP and IL6, are protective of the endothelial system in cardiovascular health, and have extra-hepatic effects including in the lung. However, it remains unknown whether these statin effects on lung health are in sum helpful or harmful. Despite the overwhelming epidemiologic data indicating benefit in COPD, we still require multiple RCTs before we can know with certainty whether statins will be beneficial in COPD.

In the Copenhagen City Heart Study, 1,302 patients with COPD were followed over 8 years, and their CRP levels and COPD outcomes were measured. The authors reported that CRP is a strong and independent predictor of future COPD hospitalizations and death (Dahl, et al., 2007). More recently, systemic inflammation in COPD (as assessed by IL6 measurements over 3 years) is seen as progressive and associated with increased mortality (Hazard Ratio 2.68, 95% CI 0.13–1.84, p = 0.02) and decreased exercise tolerance (Ferrari, et al., 2013).

Although large-scale multi-center RCT data are not yet available, in a small study using a case management approach, COPD patients treated with a statin after 3 months had an approximately 50% reduction in serum CRP (p=0.02) (McDonald, Higgins, Wood, & Gibson, 2013). While statins reduce CRP levels, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) do not affect CRP in elderly patients with bronchial airflow obstruction (Melbye, et al., 2007). This suggests that an important element in the pathogenesis of obstructive airway diseases is unaffected by ICS, a cornerstone of current standard-of-care therapy.

Thus, understanding the pathogenic role of systemic inflammation in COPD, which is at least partially represented by elevated CRP blood levels, is important given these therapeutic implications. Based on what we have learned about CRP and associated outcomes based on CRP levels (the higher the CRP, the worse the COPD outcome), future studies using statins should stratify treatment based on whether CRP is > or < 3 mg/L.

Because most of the studies evaluating the effects of statins in COPD are observational, the effect is at best correlative, not causal. Even such consistent associations have been challenged by some authors due to inherent biases to observational study designs (Suissa, 2010). In truth, the best answers are derived from multiple different RCTs and ideally from different centers. Although a few RCTs have been published, several ongoing RCTs (www.clinicaltrials.gov) will evaluate important clinical outcomes in COPD and help answer the question: Is there a statin indication in COPD?

Two RCTs in COPD demonstrate a statin advantage with respect to functional capacity and systemic anti-inflammatory effect (T. M. Lee, Chen, Shen, & Chang, 2009; T. M. Lee, Lin, & Chang, 2008). Lee et al. showed that pravastatin (40 mg daily) for 6 months not only reduced serum CRP (by 70%), but significantly increased exercise time by 54% (p<0.0001) as compared to placebo. In addition, pravastatin-treated patients with a greater decrease in CRP had a significant improvement in exercise time compared to those without a decrease in CRP (T. M. Lee, et al., 2008). In a subsequent trial also using pravastatin (40 mg daily) for 6 months, Lee et al. showed that pravastatin significantly improved exercise tolerance, decreased dyspnea, and reduced pulmonary artery pressures in patients with COPD and pulmonary hypertension (T. M. Lee, et al., 2009).

In another short (3 month) RCT using simvastatin (40 mg/day) in patients with COPD, there was no reduction in circulating inflammatory biomarkers (fibrinogen, CRP, TNFα, IL6, MMP-9) and no change in FEV1 or FVC despite a decrease in total cholesterol and LDL (Kaczmarek, et al., 2010). No hard clinical outcomes such as exacerbation or survival were determined in this clinical trial.

Given the different sub-phenotypes of COPD being reported (Agusti & Faner, 2012; Beghe, Verduri, Roca, & Fabbri, 2013; Hurst, et al., 2010), the design of future clinical trials should take this into consideration in order to enroll patients most likely to benefit from a statin.

Potential Pulmonary Adverse Reactions Due to Statins

Despite the diverse and extensive body of literature indicating a benefit to statin use in lung diseases, there is some evidence to suggest potential harm. Statin-induced lung injury (SILI) is a rare but serious condition associated with statin use (L. K. Huang, et al., 2013) as is statin-induced fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia, an interstitial lung disease (ILD) (Lantuejoul, Brambilla, Brambilla, & Devouassoux, 2002).

In the COPDGene cohort, statin use is associated with interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) in older smokers (age >65) and enhances bleomycin-induced lung inflammation and fibrosis in mice by a mechanism involving NLRP3-inflammasome activation (J. F. Xu, et al., 2012). However, in younger patients (age 45–55) there is a trend towards reduced risk of statin-associated ILA, raising the question of whether age and smoking status interacts with statin use in a manner that gives these paradoxical results (Thannickal & Hagood, 2012; J. F. Xu, et al., 2012).

Also, in at least three prior animal studies, statins prevented or attenuated bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis (J. W. Kim, et al., 2010; Ou, et al., 2008; Schroll, et al., 2013), contrary to the findings by Xu et al (J. F. Xu, et al., 2012). Furthermore, subsequent to the study by Xu et al., a large study of 6,665 patients with ILD was conducted and found no association between statin use and the incidence of ILD (Saad, Camus, Suissa, & Ernst, 2013).

These studies indicate that in some rare cases, statins could pose a potential harm to patients. However, for the vast majority of patients, statins given for approved indications are probably safe; where the benefits likely outweigh the potential pulmonary risks.

Summary and Future Directions

In this focused review we have discussed the critical role the MVA cascade and its intermediates play in cardiovascular diseases, cancer and pulmonary diseases. Cholesterol, the isoprenoids and their isoprenylation targets the Ras and Rho family GTPases, all have diverse and complex roles in basic cellular biology and physiology.

In cardiovascular diseases, asthma and COPD alone there is a large body of evidence supporting this, but an emerging literature also indicates the involvement of these pathways in cancers and other lung diseases such as ALI/ARDS, pneumonia, IPF, pulmonary hypertension, etc.

Statins have emerged as pleiotropic drugs with wide-ranging effects beyond cholesterol lowering. In both large epidemiologic studies and basic science experiments, statins have demonstrated a consistent beneficial effect on heart and lung physiology and pathological mechanisms.

We see statins as having not a singular role in a therapeutic armamentarium, but rather as an important adjunctive therapy to current standard-of-care regimens. Statins therefore hold a unique place in the world of emerging and innovative new therapies because of their overwhelming safety profile and potential to treat comorbid conditions, beyond atherosclerosis.

We believe that clinical trials targeting subpopulations of cancer patients, asthma and COPD with the ‘right’ sub-phenotype will yield fruitful results in the years to come. Ongoing studies should evaluate not only statins and their optimal route of administration, but also combination therapies with Rho and Ras inhibitors, Rho kinase inhibitors (i.e. Y27632) and prenyltransferase inhibitors.

Acknowledgments

A career-developing award provided by Parker B Francis Foundation supported SG. PS was supported by CIHR postdoctoral fellowship award. AAZ was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH), through grant #UL1 TR000002 to AAZ; and CTSC NIH KL2 (K12) Award TR000134.

Abbreviation List

15-epi-LXA4

15-epi-Lipoxin A4

HMGCR

3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A Reductase

HMGCoA

3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A

ALI

Acute Lung Injury

ALL

Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia

ARDS

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

AFCAPS

Air Force Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study

AHR

Airway Hyperreactivity

ACE

Angiotensin Converting Enzyme

ARB

Angiotensin Receptor Blocker

ASCOT-LLA

Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lower Arm

NAC

N-acetylcysteine

ACQ

Asthma Control Questionnaire

ADMA

Asymmetric Dimethylarginine

AF

Atrial Fibrillation

BE

Bronchial Epithelial

BALF

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid

CV

Cardiovascular

Cdc42

Cell Division Cycle-42

CCL

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand

CARE

Cholesterol and Recurrent Events

CML

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

COPD

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

CS

Cigarette Smoke

JNK

C-jun NH2-Terminal Kinase

CARDS

Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study

CAD

Coronary Artery Disease

CRP

C- reactive protein

CF

Cystic Fibrosis

ED

Emergency Department

ER

Endoplasmic Reticulum

EMT

Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition

ECM

Extracellular Matrix

FT

Farensyltrasferase

FDP

Farnesyl Diphosphate

FPP

Farnesyl pyrophosphate

FTase

Farnesyltransferase

FTIs

Farnesyltransferase Inhibitors

GGPP

Geranylgeranylpyrophosphate

GPP

Geranyl Pyrophosphate

GGTase

Gerenylgeranyltransferase

GGTIs

Gerenylgeranyltransferase Inhibitors

GAPs

GTPase Activating Proteins

GDIs

Guanine Dissociation Inhibitors

GEFs

Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors

GTPase

Guanosine Triphosphatase

HCC cells

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells

HFL-1

Human Fetal Lung Fibroblast

HMEC-1

Human Microvascular Endothelial Cells

HC

Hydroxycholesterol

HIDS

Hyperimmunoglobulinemia D Syndrome

ICS

Inhaled Corticosteroid

ICAM

Inter-Cellular Adhesion Molecule

IL

Interleukin

ILD

Interstitial Lung Disease

JUPITER

Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin

LTB4

Leukotriene B4

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

LIPID

Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease

LDL

Low-Density-Lipoprotein

LFA1

Lymphocyte Function-Associated Antigen 1

MMP

Matrix Metalloproteinase

MVA

Mevalonate

MVAK

Mevalonate Kinase

MM

Multiple Myeloma

MI

Myocardial Infarction

MIRACL

Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering

NOS

Nitric Oxide Synthase

NO

Nitric Oxide

OR

Odds Ratio

OVA

Ovalbumin

PCCs

Pancreatic Carcinoma Cells

PM

Particulate Matter

PPAR

Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor

PROVE IT

Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy

PTase

Prenyltransferase

PGE2

Prostaglandin E2

REVERSAL

Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid lowering

ROCK

Rho GTPase and Rho kinase

SH

Spontaneously Hypertensive

SILI

Statin-Induced Lung Injury

T-ALL

T-acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

TexCAPS

Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study

Th

T-helper

TSLP

Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin

TLR

Toll-like Receptor

TGF

Transforming Growth Factor

VEGF

Vascular Endothelia Growth Factor

VE

Vascular Endothelial

WOSCOPS

West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflict of Interest

All authors confirm that there is not any conflict of interest with individuals or organizations within three years of initiating the work that could inappropriately influence, or be perceived to influence, the study design or data interpretation.

References

  1. Abecassis I, Olofsson B, Schmid M, Zalcman G, Karniguian A. RhoA induces MMP-9 expression at CD44 lamellipodial focal complexes and promotes HMEC-1 cell invasion. Exp Cell Res. 2003;291:363–376. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2003.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adachi T, Vita R, Sannohe S, Stafford S, Alam R, Kayaba H, Chihara J. The functional role of rho and rho-associated coiled-coil forming protein kinase in eotaxin signaling of eosinophils. J Immunol. 2001;167:4609–4615. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.8.4609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adiguzel E, Hou G, Sabatini PJ, Bendeck MP. Type VIII collagen signals via beta1 integrin and RhoA to regulate MMP-2 expression and smooth muscle cell migration. Matrix Biol. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2013.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adnane J, Bizouarn FA, Qian Y, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. p21(WAF1/CIP1) is upregulated by the geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitor GGTI-298 through a transforming growth factor beta- and Sp1-responsive element: involvement of the small GTPase rhoA. Molecular and cellular biology. 1998;18:6962–6970. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.12.6962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Adnane J, Muro-Cacho C, Mathews L, Sebti SM, Munoz-Antonia T. Suppression of rho B expression in invasive carcinoma from head and neck cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:2225–2232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Agarwal B, Bhendwal S, Halmos B, Moss SF, Ramey WG, Holt PR. Lovastatin augments apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic agents in colon cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:2223–2229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Agusti A, Faner R. Systemic inflammation and comorbidities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012;9:43–46. doi: 10.1513/pats.201108-050MS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ahmad T, Mabalirajan U, Sharma A, Aich J, Makhija L, Ghosh B, Agrawal A. Simvastatin improves epithelial dysfunction and airway hyperresponsiveness: from asymmetric dimethyl-arginine to asthma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;44:531–539. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2010-0041OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ahn KS, Sethi G, Aggarwal BB. Simvastatin potentiates TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis through the down-regulation of NF-kappaB-dependent antiapoptotic gene products: role of IkappaBalpha kinase and TGF-beta-activated kinase-1. J Immunol. 2007;178:2507–2516. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.4.2507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Alberts AW. Discovery, biochemistry and biology of lovastatin. The American journal of cardiology. 1988a;62:10J–15J. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Alberts AW. Discovery, biochemistry and biology of lovastatin. Am J Cardiol. 1988b;62:10J–15J. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Alberts AW, Chen J, Kuron G, Hunt V, Huff J, Hoffman C, Rothrock J, Lopez M, Joshua H, Harris E, Patchett A, Monaghan R, Currie S, Stapley E, Albers-Schonberg G, Hensens O, Hirshfield J, Hoogsteen K, Liesch J, Springer J. Mevinolin: a highly potent competitive inhibitor of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and a cholesterol-lowering agent. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1980a;77:3957–3961. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.3957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Alberts AW, Chen J, Kuron G, Hunt V, Huff J, Hoffman C, Rothrock J, Lopez M, Joshua H, Harris E, Patchett A, Monaghan R, Currie S, Stapley E, Albers-Schonberg G, Hensens O, Hirshfield J, Hoogsteen K, Liesch J, Springer J. Mevinolin: a highly potent competitive inhibitor of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and a cholesterol-lowering agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980b;77:3957–3961. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.3957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Alexeeff SE, Litonjua AA, Sparrow D, Vokonas PS, Schwartz J. Statin use reduces decline in lung function: VA Normative Aging Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:742–747. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200705-656OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Antonopoulos AS, Margaritis M, Shirodaria C, Antoniades C. Translating the effects of statins: from redox regulation to suppression of vascular wall inflammation. Thromb Haemost. 2012;108:840–848. doi: 10.1160/TH12-05-0337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Appels NM, Bolijn MJ, van Eijndhoven MA, Stephens TC, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH. Characterization of the in vitro activity of AZD3409, a novel prenyl transferase inhibitor. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 2011;67:137–145. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1300-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Arnaboldi L, Corsini A. Do structural differences in statins correlate with clinical efficacy? Current opinion in lipidology. 2010;21:298–304. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e32833b776c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Aslam M, Schluter KD, Rohrbach S, Rafiq A, Nazli S, Piper HM, Noll T, Schulz R, Gunduz D. Hypoxia-reoxygenation-induced endothelial barrier failure: role of RhoA, Rac1 and myosin light chain kinase. J Physiol. 2013;591:461–473. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.237834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bando M, Miyazawa T, Shinohara H, Owada T, Terakado M, Sugiyama Y. An epidemiological study of the effects of statin use on airflow limitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology. 2012;17:493–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02116.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bansal D, Undela K, D'Cruz S, Schifano F. Statin use and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. PloS one. 2012;7:e46691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Barnes PJ. Against the Dutch hypothesis: asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are distinct diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:240–243. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2604008. discussion 243–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Barnes PJ. Immunology of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:183–192. doi: 10.1038/nri2254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bartziokas K, Papaioannou AI, Minas M, Kostikas K, Banya W, Daniil ZD, Haniotou A, Gourgoulianis KI. Statins and outcome after hospitalization for COPD exacerbation: a prospective study. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2011;24:625–631. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Beghe B, Verduri A, Roca M, Fabbri LM. Exacerbation of respiratory symptoms in COPD patients may not be exacerbations of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2013;41:993–995. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00180812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bellovin DI, Simpson KJ, Danilov T, Maynard E, Rimm DL, Oettgen P, Mercurio AM. Reciprocal regulation of RhoA and RhoC characterizes the EMT and identifies RhoC as a prognostic marker of colon carcinoma. Oncogene. 2006;25:6959–6967. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bhavsar PJ, Infante E, Khwaja A, Ridley AJ. Analysis of Rho GTPase expression in T-ALL identifies RhoU as a target for Notch involved in T-ALL cell migration. Oncogene. 2013;32:198–208. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Birukov KG. Small GTPases in mechanosensitive regulation of endothelial barrier. Microvasc Res. 2009;77:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2008.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Birukova AA, Smurova K, Birukov KG, Kaibuchi K, Garcia JG, Verin AD. Role of Rho GTPases in thrombin-induced lung vascular endothelial cells barrier dysfunction. Microvasc Res. 2004;67:64–77. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2003.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Birukova AA, Tian Y, Meliton A, Leff A, Wu T, Birukov KG. Stimulation of Rho signaling by pathologic mechanical stretch is a "second hit" to Rho-independent lung injury induced by IL-6. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;302:L965–L975. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00292.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Bishop WR, Bond R, Petrin J, Wang L, Patton R, Doll R, Njoroge G, Catino J, Schwartz J, Windsor W, et al. Novel tricyclic inhibitors of farnesyl protein transferase. Biochemical characterization and inhibition of Ras modification in transfected Cos cells. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1995;270:30611–30618. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.51.30611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Blamoun AI, Batty GN, DeBari VA, Rashid AO, Sheikh M, Khan MA. Statins may reduce episodes of exacerbation and the requirement for intubation in patients with COPD: evidence from a retrospective cohort study. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62:1373–1378. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01731.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Bommi-Reddy A, Kaelin WG., Jr Slaying RAS with a synthetic lethal weapon. Cell research. 2010;20:119–121. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Bonovas S, Filioussi K, Flordellis CS, Sitaras NM. Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 18 studies involving more than 1.5 million patients. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3462–3468. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.8936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Boos CJ, Anderson RA, Lip GY. Is atrial fibrillation an inflammatory disorder? European heart journal. 2006;27:136–149. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Boquet P, Lemichez E. Bacterial virulence factors targeting Rho GTPases: parasitism or symbiosis? Trends Cell Biol. 2003;13:238–246. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(03)00037-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Boulter E, Estrach S, Garcia-Mata R, Feral CC. Off the beaten paths: alternative and crosstalk regulation of Rho GTPases. FASEB J. 2012;26:469–479. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-192252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Boulter E, Garcia-Mata R, Guilluy C, Dubash A, Rossi G, Brennwald PJ, Burridge K. Regulation of Rho GTPase crosstalk, degradation and activity by RhoGDI1. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:477–483. doi: 10.1038/ncb2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Boureux A, Vignal E, Faure S, Fort P. Evolution of the Rho family of ras-like GTPases in eukaryotes. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:203–216. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Bouterfa HL, Sattelmeyer V, Czub S, Vordermark D, Roosen K, Tonn JC. Inhibition of Ras farnesylation by lovastatin leads to downregulation of proliferation and migration in primary cultured human glioblastoma cells. Anticancer Res. 2000;20:2761–2771. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Braga VM, Yap AS. The challenges of abundance: epithelial junctions and small GTPase signalling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17:466–474. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Braganza G, Chaudhuri R, McSharry C, Weir CJ, Donnelly I, Jolly L, Lafferty J, Lloyd SM, Spears M, Mair F, Thomson NC. Effects of short-term treatment with atorvastatin in smokers with asthma--a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pulm Med. 2011;11:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-11-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Brandelius A, Mahmutovic Persson I, Calven J, Bjermer L, Persson CG, Andersson M, Uller L. Selective inhibition by simvastatin of IRF3 phosphorylation and TSLP production in dsRNA-challenged bronchial epithelial cells from COPD donors. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;168:363–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02131.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Bratt JM, Zeki AA, Last JA, Kenyon NJ. Competitive metabolism of L-arginine: arginase as a therapeutic target in asthma. J Biomed Res. 2011;25:299–308. doi: 10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60041-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Brown MS, Goldstein JL, Paris KJ, Burnier JP, Marsters JC., Jr Tetrapeptide inhibitors of protein farnesyltransferase: amino-terminal substitution in phenylalanine-containing tetrapeptides restores farnesylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1992;89:8313–8316. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Burbelo P, Wellstein A, Pestell RG. Altered Rho GTPase signaling pathways in breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;84:43–48. doi: 10.1023/B:BREA.0000018422.02237.f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Cafforio P, Dammacco F, Gernone A, Silvestris F. Statins activate the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in human lymphoblasts and myeloma cells. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:883–891. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Camoretti-Mercado B. Targeting the airway smooth muscle for asthma treatment. Transl Res. 2009;154:165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2009.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Rader DJ, Rouleau JL, Belder R, Joyal SV, Hill KA, Pfeffer MA, Skene AM. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. The New England journal of medicine. 2004;350:1495–1504. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Cannon CP, Steinberg BA, Murphy SA, Mega JL, Braunwald E. Meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes trials comparing intensive versus moderate statin therapy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006;48:438–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Capell BC, Olive M, Erdos MR, Cao K, Faddah DA, Tavarez UL, Conneely KN, Qu X, San H, Ganesh SK, Chen X, Avallone H, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, Nabel EG, Collins FS. A farnesyltransferase inhibitor prevents both the onset and late progression of cardiovascular disease in a progeria mouse model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:15902–15907. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807840105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Capra V, Rovati GE. Rosuvastatin inhibits human airway smooth muscle cells mitogenic response to eicosanoid contractile agents. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2013.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Carlin CM, Celnik DF, Pak O, Wadsworth R, Peacock AJ, Welsh DJ. Low-dose fluvastatin reverses the hypoxic pulmonary adventitial fibroblast phenotype in experimental pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012;47:140–148. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2011-0411OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Carlin CM, Peacock AJ, Welsh DJ. Fluvastatin inhibits hypoxic proliferation and p38 MAPK activity in pulmonary artery fibroblasts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2007;37:447–456. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0012OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Castaneda C, Meadows KL, Truax R, Morse MA, Kaufmann SH, Petros WP, Zhu Y, Statkevich P, Cutler DL, Hurwitz HI. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of lonafarnib, SCH 66336, using a 2-week on, 2-week off schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 2011;67:455–463. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1488-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Cazzola M, Calzetta L, Page CP, Rinaldi B, Capuano A, Matera MG. Protein prenylation contributes to the effects of LPS on EFS-induced responses in human isolated bronchi. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;45:704–710. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2010-0306OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Chang C, Werb Z. The many faces of metalloproteases: cell growth, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11:S37–S43. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(01)02122-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Chen J, Hou J, Zhang J, An Y, Zhang X, Yue L, Liu J, Li X. Atorvastatin synergizes with IFN-gamma in treating human non-small cell lung carcinomas via potent inhibition of RhoA activity. Eur J Pharmacol. 2012;682:161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Chen JC, Wu ML, Huang KC, Lin WW. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors activate the unfolded protein response and induce cytoprotective GRP78 expression. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;80:138–150. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvn160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Chen W, Pendyala S, Natarajan V, Garcia JG, Jacobson JR. Endothelial cell barrier protection by simvastatin: GTPase regulation and NADPH oxidase inhibition. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;295:L575–L583. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00428.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Chen YJ, Chen P, Wang HX, Wang T, Chen L, Wang X, Sun BB, Liu DS, Xu D, An J, Wen FQ. Simvastatin attenuates acrolein-induced mucin production in rats: involvement of the Ras/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2010;10:685–693. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2010.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Chiba Y, Arima J, Sakai H, Misawa M. Lovastatin inhibits bronchial hyperresponsiveness by reducing RhoA signaling in rat allergic asthma. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;294:L705–L713. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00531.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Chiba Y, Nakazawa S, Todoroki M, Shinozaki K, Sakai H, Misawa M. Interleukin-13 augments bronchial smooth muscle contractility with an up-regulation of RhoA protein. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2009;40:159–167. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0162OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Chiba Y, Sato S, Hanazaki M, Sakai H, Misawa M. Inhibition of geranylgeranyltransferase inhibits bronchial smooth muscle hyperresponsiveness in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2009;297:L984–L991. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00178.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Chiba Y, Sato S, Misawa M. GGTI-2133, an inhibitor of geranylgeranyltransferase, inhibits infiltration of inflammatory cells into airways in mouse experimental asthma. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009a;22:929–935. doi: 10.1177/039463200902200408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Chiba Y, Sato S, Misawa M. Lovastatin inhibits antigen-induced airway eosinophilia without affecting the production of inflammatory mediators in mice. Inflamm Res. 2009b;58:363–369. doi: 10.1007/s00011-009-0043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Citi S, Spadaro D, Schneider Y, Stutz J, Pulimeno P. Regulation of small GTPases at epithelial cell-cell junctions. Mol Membr Biol. 2011;28:427–444. doi: 10.3109/09687688.2011.603101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Clark EA, Golub TR, Lander ES, Hynes RO. Genomic analysis of metastasis reveals an essential role for RhoC. Nature. 2000;406:532–535. doi: 10.1038/35020106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Clendening JW, Pandyra A, Boutros PC, El Ghamrasni S, Khosravi F, Trentin GA, Martirosyan A, Hakem A, Hakem R, Jurisica I, Penn LZ. Dysregulation of the mevalonate pathway promotes transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:15051–15056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910258107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Clendening JW, Penn LZ. Targeting tumor cell metabolism with statins. Oncogene. 2012;31:4967–4978. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Coleman JM, Naik C, Holguin F, Ray A, Ray P, Trudeau JB, Wenzel SE. Epithelial eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3 expression: relation to asthma severity, luminal eosinophilia and age at onset. Thorax. 2012;67:1061–1066. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Collisson EA, Kleer C, Wu M, De A, Gambhir SS, Merajver SD, Kolodney MS. Atorvastatin prevents RhoC isoprenylation, invasion, and metastasis in human melanoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003;2:941–948. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Cowan DC, Cowan JO, Palmay R, Williamson A, Taylor DR. Simvastatin in the treatment of asthma: lack of steroid-sparing effect. Thorax. 2010;65:891–896. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.138990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Coxon FP, Helfrich MH, Larijani B, Muzylak M, Dunford JE, Marshall D, McKinnon AD, Nesbitt SA, Horton MA, Seabra MC, Ebetino FH, Rogers MJ. Identification of a novel phosphonocarboxylate inhibitor of Rab geranylgeranyl transferase that specifically prevents Rab prenylation in osteoclasts and macrophages. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2001;276:48213–48222. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106473200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Coxon FP, Helfrich MH, Van't Hof R, Sebti S, Ralston SH, Hamilton A, Rogers MJ. Protein geranylgeranylation is required for osteoclast formation, function, and survival: inhibition by bisphosphonates and GGTI-298. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2000;15:1467–1476. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Crul M, de Klerk GJ, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH. Ras biochemistry and farnesyl transferase inhibitors: a literature survey. Anti-cancer drugs. 2001;12:163–184. doi: 10.1097/00001813-200103000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Dahl M, Vestbo J, Lange P, Bojesen SE, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. C-reactive protein as a predictor of prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:250–255. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200605-713OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Davis BB, Zeki AA, Bratt JM, Wang L, Filosto S, Walby WF, Kenyon NJ, Goldkorn T, Schelegle ES, Pinkerton KE. Simvastatin inhibits smoke-induced airway epithelial injury: implications for COPD therapy. Eur Respir J. 2012 doi: 10.1183/09031936.00042512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. De Martin R, Hoeth M, Hofer-Warbinek R, Schmid JA. The transcription factor NF-kappa B and the regulation of vascular cell function. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2000;20:E83–E88. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.11.e83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Dechend R, Fiebeler A, Park JK, Muller DN, Theuer J, Mervaala E, Bieringer M, Gulba D, Dietz R, Luft FC, Haller H. Amelioration of angiotensin II-induced cardiac injury by a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitor. Circulation. 2001;104:576–581. doi: 10.1161/hc3001.092039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Demierre MF, Higgins PD, Gruber SB, Hawk E, Lippman SM. Statins and cancer prevention. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:930–942. doi: 10.1038/nrc1751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Denoyelle C, Albanese P, Uzan G, Hong L, Vannier JP, Soria J, Soria C. Molecular mechanism of the anti-cancer activity of cerivastatin, an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, on aggressive human breast cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2003;15:327–338. doi: 10.1016/s0898-6568(02)00124-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Denoyelle C, Vasse M, Korner M, Mishal Z, Ganne F, Vannier JP, Soria J, Soria C. Cerivastatin, an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, inhibits the signaling pathways involved in the invasiveness and metastatic properties of highly invasive breast cancer cell lines: an in vitro study. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:1139–1148. doi: 10.1093/carcin/22.8.1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Desai LP, Aryal AM, Ceacareanu B, Hassid A, Waters CM. RhoA and Rac1 are both required for efficient wound closure of airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004;287:L1134–L1144. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00022.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Dietrich KA, Schwarz R, Liska M, Grass S, Menke A, Meister M, Kierschke G, Langle C, Genze F, Giehl K. Specific induction of migration and invasion of pancreatic carcinoma cells by RhoC, which differs from RhoA in its localisation and activity. Biol Chem. 2009;390:1063–1077. doi: 10.1515/BC.2009.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. DiPaolo BC, Margulies SS. Rho kinase signaling pathways during stretch in primary alveolar epithelia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;302:L992–L1002. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00175.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Dobler CC, Wong KK, Marks GB. Associations between statins and COPD: a systematic review. BMC Pulm Med. 2009;9:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S, Whitney E, Shapiro DR, Beere PA, Langendorfer A, Stein EA, Kruyer W, Gotto AM., Jr Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;279:1615–1622. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.20.1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Dumitru CA, Dreschers S, Gulbins E. Rhinoviral infections activate p38MAP-kinases via membrane rafts and RhoA. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2006;17:159–166. doi: 10.1159/000092077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Duncan RE, El-Sohemy A, Archer MC. Mevalonate promotes the growth of tumors derived from human cancer cells in vivo and stimulates proliferation in vitro with enhanced cyclin-dependent kinase-2 activity. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:33079–33084. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400732200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Dunzendorfer S, Rothbucher D, Schratzberger P, Reinisch N, Kahler CM, Wiedermann CJ. Mevalonate-dependent inhibition of transendothelial migration and chemotaxis of human peripheral blood neutrophils by pravastatin. Circ Res. 1997;81:963–969. doi: 10.1161/01.res.81.6.963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Duong-Quy S, Bei Y, Liu Z, Dinh-Xuan AT. Role of Rho-kinase and its inhibitors in pulmonary hypertension. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;137:352–364. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Duong-Quy S, Dao P, Hua-Huy T, Guilluy C, Pacaud P, Dinh-Xuan AT. Increased Rho-kinase expression and activity and pulmonary endothelial dysfunction in smokers with normal lung function. Eur Respir J. 2011;37:349–355. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00056610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Duque G, Vidal C, Rivas D. Protein isoprenylation regulates osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells: effect of alendronate, and farnesyl and geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitors. British journal of pharmacology. 2011;162:1109–1118. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01111.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. End DW, Smets G, Todd AV, Applegate TL, Fuery CJ, Angibaud P, Venet M, Sanz G, Poignet H, Skrzat S, Devine A, Wouters W, Bowden C. Characterization of the antitumor effects of the selective farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor R115777 in vivo and in vitro. Cancer research. 2001;61:131–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Endo A. A historical perspective on the discovery of statins. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2010;86:484–493. doi: 10.2183/pjab.86.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Endo A, Hasumi K, Negishi S. Monacolins J and L, new inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis produced by Monascus ruber. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1985;38:420–422. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.38.420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Endo A, Kuroda M, Tsujita Y. ML-236A, ML-236B, and ML-236C, new inhibitors of cholesterogenesis produced by Penicillium citrinium. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1976;29:1346–1348. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.29.1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Engelmann MD, Svendsen JH. Inflammation in the genesis and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation. European heart journal. 2005;26:2083–2092. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Epling-Burnette PK, Loughran TP., Jr Suppression of farnesyltransferase activity in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: current understanding and recommended use of tipifarnib. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2010;19:689–698. doi: 10.1517/13543781003801076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A. Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature. 2002;420:629–635. doi: 10.1038/nature01148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Faried A, Nakajima M, Sohda M, Miyazaki T, Kato H, Kuwano H. Correlation between RhoA overexpression and tumour progression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:410–414. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Farina HG, Bublik DR, Alonso DF, Gomez DE. Lovastatin alters cytoskeleton organization and inhibits experimental metastasis of mammary carcinoma cells. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2002;19:551–559. doi: 10.1023/a:1020355621043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Fauchier L, Pierre B, de Labriolle A, Grimard C, Zannad N, Babuty D. Antiarrhythmic effect of statin therapy and atrial fibrillation a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;51:828–835. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Feleszko W, Balkowiec EZ, Sieberth E, Marczak M, Dabrowska A, Giermasz A, Czajka A, Jakobisiak M. Lovastatin and tumor necrosis factor-alpha exhibit potentiated antitumor effects against Ha-ras-transformed murine tumor via inhibition of tumor-induced angiogenesis. Int J Cancer. 1999;81:560–567. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990517)81:4<560::aid-ijc10>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Feleszko W, Mlynarczuk I, Olszewska D, Jalili A, Grzela T, Lasek W, Hoser G, Korczak-Kowalska G, Jakobisiak M. Lovastatin potentiates antitumor activity of doxorubicin in murine melanoma via an apoptosis-dependent mechanism. Int J Cancer. 2002;100:111–118. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Fernandes LB, Henry PJ, Goldie RG. Rho kinase as a therapeutic target in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2007;1:25–33. doi: 10.1177/1753465807080740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Ferrari R, Tanni SE, Caram LM, Correa C, Correa CR, Godoy I. Three-year follow-up of Interleukin 6 and C-reactive protein in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res. 2013;14:24. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Foster R, Hu KQ, Lu Y, Nolan KM, Thissen J, Settleman J. Identification of a novel human Rho protein with unusual properties: GTPase deficiency and in vivo farnesylation. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:2689–2699. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.2689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Frick M, Dulak J, Cisowski J, Jozkowicz A, Zwick R, Alber H, Dichtl W, Schwarzacher SP, Pachinger O, Weidinger F. Statins differentially regulate vascular endothelial growth factor synthesis in endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis. 2003;170:229–236. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(03)00299-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Frost FJ, Petersen H, Tollestrup K, Skipper B. Influenza and COPD mortality protection as pleiotropic, dose-dependent effects of statins. Chest. 2007;131:1006–1012. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Fukata Y, Amano M, Kaibuchi K. Rho-Rho-kinase pathway in smooth muscle contraction and cytoskeletal reorganization of non-muscle cells. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22:32–39. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01596-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Gaylor JL. Membrane-bound enzymes of cholesterol synthesis from lanosterol. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;292:1139–1146. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Gazzerro P, Proto MC, Gangemi G, Malfitano AM, Ciaglia E, Pisanti S, Santoro A, Laezza C, Bifulco M. Pharmacological actions of statins: a critical appraisal in the management of cancer. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;64:102–146. doi: 10.1124/pr.111.004994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Ghavami S, Mutawe MM, Hauff K, Stelmack GL, Schaafsma D, Sharma P, McNeill KD, Hynes TS, Kung SK, Unruh H, Klonisch T, Hatch GM, Los M, Halayko AJ. Statin-triggered cell death in primary human lung mesenchymal cells involves p53-PUMA and release of Smac and Omi but not cytochrome c. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1803:452–467. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Ghavami S, Mutawe MM, Schaafsma D, Yeganeh B, Unruh H, Klonisch T, Halayko AJ. Geranylgeranyl transferase 1 modulates autophagy and apoptosis in human airway smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;302:L420–L428. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00312.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Ghavami S, Mutawe MM, Sharma P, Yeganeh B, McNeill KD, Klonisch T, Unruh H, Kashani HH, Schaafsma D, Los M, Halayko AJ. Mevalonate cascade regulation of airway mesenchymal cell autophagy and apoptosis: a dual role for p53. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Ghavami S, Yeganeh B, Stelmack GL, Kashani HH, Sharma P, Cunnington R, Rattan S, Bathe K, Klonisch T, Dixon IM, Freed DH, Halayko AJ. Apoptosis, autophagy and ER stress in mevalonate cascade inhibition-induced cell death of human atrial fibroblasts. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3:e330. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Ghittoni R, Patrussi L, Pirozzi K, Pellegrini M, Lazzerini PE, Capecchi PL, Pasini FL, Baldari CT. Simvastatin inhibits T-cell activation by selectively impairing the function of Ras superfamily GTPases. FASEB J. 2005;19:605–607. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2702fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Gil G, Faust JR, Chin DJ, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Membrane-bound domain of HMG CoA reductase is required for sterol-enhanced degradation of the enzyme. Cell. 1985;41:249–258. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90078-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Goldklang M, Golovatch P, Zelonina T, Trischler J, Rabinowitz D, Lemaitre V, D'Armiento J. Activation of the TLR4 signaling pathway and abnormal cholesterol efflux lead to emphysema in ApoE-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;302:L1200–L1208. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00454.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Progress in understanding the LDL receptor and HMG-CoA reductase, two membrane proteins that regulate the plasma cholesterol. J Lipid Res. 1984;25:1450–1461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature. 1990;343:425–430. doi: 10.1038/343425a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Goldstein JL, Brown MS, Stradley SJ, Reiss Y, Gierasch LM. Nonfarnesylated tetrapeptide inhibitors of protein farnesyltransferase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1991;266:15575–15578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Gomez del Pulgar T, Benitah SA, Valeron PF, Espina C, Lacal JC. Rho GTPase expression in tumourigenesis: evidence for a significant link. Bioessays. 2005;27:602–613. doi: 10.1002/bies.20238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Gopalan A, Yu W, Sanders BG, Kline K. Simvastatin inhibition of mevalonate pathway induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cells via activation of JNK/CHOP/DR5 signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 2013;329:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Goto K, Chiba Y, Sakai H, Misawa M. Mechanism of inhibitory effect of prednisolone on RhoA upregulation in human bronchial smooth muscle cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 2010;33:710–713. doi: 10.1248/bpb.33.710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Gouw LG, Reading NS, Jenson SD, Lim MS, Elenitoba-Johnson KS. Expression of the Rho-family GTPase gene RHOF in lymphocyte subsets and malignant lymphomas. Br J Haematol. 2005;129:531–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Gowdy KM, Fessler MB. Emerging roles for cholesterol and lipoproteins in lung disease. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013;26:430–437. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2012.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Greenwood J, Steinman L, Zamvil SS. Statin therapy and autoimmune disease: from protein prenylation to immunomodulation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:358–370. doi: 10.1038/nri1839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Guilluy C, Eddahibi S, Agard C, Guignabert C, Izikki M, Tu L, Savale L, Humbert M, Fadel E, Adnot S, Loirand G, Pacaud P. RhoA and Rho kinase activation in human pulmonary hypertension: role of 5-HT signaling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179:1151–1158. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200805-691OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Guo LL, Chen YJ, Wang T, An J, Wang CN, Shen YC, Yang T, Zhao L, Zuo QN, Zhang XH, Xu D, Wen FQ. Ox-LDL-induced TGF-beta1 production in human alveolar epithelial cells: involvement of the Ras/ERK/PLTP pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227:3185–3191. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Haas D, Hoffmann GF. Mevalonate kinase deficiencies: from mevalonic aciduria to hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1:13. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-1-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Hakem A, Sanchez-Sweatman O, You-Ten A, Duncan G, Wakeham A, Khokha R, Mak TW. RhoC is dispensable for embryogenesis and tumor initiation but essential for metastasis. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1974–1979. doi: 10.1101/gad.1310805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Harhaj NS, Antonetti DA. Regulation of tight junctions and loss of barrier function in pathophysiology. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:1206–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2003.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Heimbrook DC, Oliff A. Therapeutic intervention and signaling. Current opinion in cell biology. 1998;10:284–288. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(98)80152-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Henson PM, Bratton DL. Allergy: airway epithelial Rac1 suppresses allergic inflammation. Curr Biol. 2013;23:R104–R106. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Hilgendorff A, Muth H, Parviz B, Staubitz A, Haberbosch W, Tillmanns H, Holschermann H. Statins differ in their ability to block NF-kappaB activation in human blood monocytes. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;41:397–401. doi: 10.5414/cpp41397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Hindler K, Cleeland CS, Rivera E, Collard CD. The role of statins in cancer therapy. Oncologist. 2006;11:306–315. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-3-306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Hoang MV, Whelan MC, Senger DR. Rho activity critically and selectively regulates endothelial cell organization during angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:1874–1879. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308525100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Hogg JC, Chu F, Utokaparch S, Woods R, Elliott WM, Buzatu L, Cherniack RM, Rogers RM, Sciurba FC, Coxson HO, Pare PD. The nature of small-airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2645–2653. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Holguin F, Comhair SA, Hazen SL, Powers RW, Khatri SS, Bleecker ER, Busse WW, Calhoun WJ, Castro M, Fitzpatrick AM, Gaston B, Israel E, Jarjour NN, Moore WC, Peters SP, Teague WG, Chung KF, Erzurum SC, Wenzel SE. An association between L-arginine/asymmetric dimethyl arginine balance, obesity, and the age of asthma onset phenotype. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:153–159. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201207-1270OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Holstein SA, Hohl RJ. Synergistic interaction of lovastatin and paclitaxel in human cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2001;1:141–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Horiguchi A, Sumitomo M, Asakuma J, Asano T, Hayakawa M. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme a reductase inhibitor, fluvastatin, as a novel agent for prophylaxis of renal cancer metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:8648–8655. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Horwich TB, MacLellan WR, Fonarow GC. Statin therapy is associated with improved survival in ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004;43:642–648. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Hothersall E, McSharry C, Thomson NC. Potential therapeutic role for statins in respiratory disease. Thorax. 2006;61:729–734. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.057976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Hothersall EJ, Chaudhuri R, McSharry C, Donnelly I, Lafferty J, McMahon AD, Weir CJ, Meiklejohn J, Sattar N, McInnes I, Wood S, Thomson NC. Effects of atorvastatin added to inhaled corticosteroids on lung function and sputum cell counts in atopic asthma. Thorax. 2008;63:1070–1075. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.100198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Huang CC, Chan WL, Chen YC, Chen TJ, Chou KT, Lin SJ, Chen JW, Leu HB. Statin use in patients with asthma: a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Clin Invest. 2011;41:507–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Huang CF, Peng HJ, Wu CC, Lo WT, Shih YL, Wu TC. Effect of oral administration with pravastatin and atorvastatin on airway hyperresponsiveness and allergic reactions in asthmatic mice. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013;110:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Huang LK, Tsai MJ, Tsai HC, Chao HS, Lin FC, Chang SC. Statin-induced lung injury: diagnostic clue and outcome. Postgrad Med J. 2013;89:14–19. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Hurst JR, Vestbo J, Anzueto A, Locantore N, Mullerova H, Tal-Singer R, Miller B, Lomas DA, Agusti A, Macnee W, Calverley P, Rennard S, Wouters EF, Wedzicha JA. Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1128–1138. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Hwang KE, Na KS, Park DS, Choi KH, Kim BR, Shim H, Jeong ET, Kim HR. Apoptotic induction by simvastatin in human lung cancer A549 cells via Akt signaling dependent down-regulation of survivin. Invest New Drugs. 2011;29:945–952. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9450-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Ibrahim SA, Yip GW, Stock C, Pan JW, Neubauer C, Poeter M, Pupjalis D, Koo CY, Kelsch R, Schule R, Rescher U, Kiesel L, Gotte M. Targeting of syndecan-1 by microRNA miR-10b promotes breast cancer cell motility and invasiveness via a Rho-GTPase- and E-cadherin-dependent mechanism. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:E884–E896. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Ichikawa T, Sugiura H, Koarai A, Kikuchi T, Hiramatsu M, Kawabata H, Akamatsu K, Hirano T, Nakanishi M, Matsunaga K, Minakata Y, Ichinose M. 25-hydroxycholesterol promotes fibroblast-mediated tissue remodeling through NF-kappaB dependent pathway. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319:1176–1186. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Imamura M, Okunishi K, Ohtsu H, Nakagome K, Harada H, Tanaka R, Yamamoto K, Dohi M. Pravastatin attenuates allergic airway inflammation by suppressing antigen sensitisation, interleukin 17 production and antigen presentation in the lung. Thorax. 2009;64:44–49. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.094540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Ishida W, Kajiwara T, Ishii M, Fujiwara F, Taneichi H, Takebe N, Takahashi K, Kaneko Y, Segawa I, Inoue H, Satoh J. Decrease in mortality rate of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with statin use: a population-based analysis in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007;212:265–273. doi: 10.1620/tjem.212.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Islam M, Lin G, Brenner JC, Pan Q, Merajver SD, Hou Y, Kumar P, Teknos TN. RhoC expression and head and neck cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer Res. 2009;7:1771–1780. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Ivanov AI, Parkos CA, Nusrat A. Cytoskeletal regulation of epithelial barrier function during inflammation. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:512–524. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Iwata A, Shirai R, Ishii H, Kushima H, Otani S, Hashinaga K, Umeki K, Kishi K, Tokimatsu I, Hiramatsu K, Kadota J. Inhibitory effect of statins on inflammatory cytokine production from human bronchial epithelial cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2012;168:234–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2012.04564.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Jacobson JR. Statins in endothelial signaling and activation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11:811–821. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Jacobson JR, Barnard JW, Grigoryev DN, Ma SF, Tuder RM, Garcia JG. Simvastatin attenuates vascular leak and inflammation in murine inflammatory lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005;288:L1026–L1032. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00354.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Jacobson JR, Dudek SM, Birukov KG, Ye SQ, Grigoryev DN, Girgis RE, Garcia JG. Cytoskeletal activation and altered gene expression in endothelial barrier regulation by simvastatin. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;30:662–670. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2003-0267OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Jakobisiak M, Bruno S, Skierski JS, Darzynkiewicz Z. Cell cycle-specific effects of lovastatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:3628–3632. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.9.3628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Janda S, Park K, FitzGerald JM, Etminan M, Swiston J. Statins in COPD: a systematic review. Chest. 2009;136:734–743. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Jasinska M, Owczarek J, Orszulak-Michalak D. Statins: a new insight into their mechanisms of action and consequent pleiotropic effects. Pharmacol Rep. 2007;59:483–499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Jiang C, Huang H, Liu J, Wang Y, Lu Z, Xu Z. Fasudil, a rho-kinase inhibitor, attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:8293–8307. doi: 10.3390/ijms13078293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Jukema JW, Cannon CP, de Craen AJ, Westendorp RG, Trompet S. The controversies of statin therapy: weighing the evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:875–881. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Juncadella IJ, Kadl A, Sharma AK, Shim YM, Hochreiter-Hufford A, Borish L, Ravichandran KS. Apoptotic cell clearance by bronchial epithelial cells critically influences airway inflammation. Nature. 2013;493:547–551. doi: 10.1038/nature11714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Kaczmarek P, Sladek K, Skucha W, Rzeszutko M, Iwaniec T, Dziedzina S, Szczeklik A. The influence of simvastatin on selected inflammatory markers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2010;120:11–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Kagami S, Kanari H, Suto A, Fujiwara M, Ikeda K, Hirose K, Watanabe N, Iwamoto I, Nakajima H. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin inhibits proinflammatory cytokine production from murine mast cells. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2008;146(Suppl 1):61–66. doi: 10.1159/000126063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Kato T, Hashikabe H, Iwata C, Akimoto K, Hattori Y. Statin blocks Rho/Rho-kinase signalling and disrupts the actin cytoskeleton: relationship to enhancement of LPS-mediated nitric oxide synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1689:267–272. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2004.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Kazi A, Carie A, Blaskovich MA, Bucher C, Thai V, Moulder S, Peng H, Carrico D, Pusateri E, Pledger WJ, Berndt N, Hamilton A, Sebti SM. Blockade of protein geranylgeranylation inhibits Cdk2-dependent p27Kip1 phosphorylation on Thr187 and accumulates p27Kip1 in the nucleus: implications for breast cancer therapy. Molecular and cellular biology. 2009;29:2254–2263. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01029-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Keddissi JI, Younis WG, Chbeir EA, Daher NN, Dernaika TA, Kinasewitz GT. The use of statins and lung function in current and former smokers. Chest. 2007;132:1764–1771. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Kikuchi T, Sugiura H, Koarai A, Ichikawa T, Minakata Y, Matsunaga K, Nakanishi M, Hirano T, Akamatsu K, Yanagisawa S, Furukawa K, Kawabata H, Ichinose M. Increase of 27-hydroxycholesterol in the airways of patients with COPD: possible role of 27-hydroxycholesterol in tissue fibrosis. Chest. 2012;142:329–337. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Kim DY, Ryu SY, Lim JE, Lee YS, Ro JY. Anti-inflammatory mechanism of simvastatin in mouse allergic asthma model. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007;557:76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Kim JW, Rhee CK, Kim TJ, Kim YH, Lee SH, Yoon HK, Kim SC, Lee SY, Kwon SS, Kim KH, Kim YK. Effect of pravastatin on bleomycin-induced acute lung injury and pulmonary fibrosis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;37:1055–1063. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2010.05431.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Kim SE, Thanh Thuy TT, Lee JH, Ro JY, Bae YA, Kong Y, Ahn JY, Lee DS, Oh YM, Lee SD, Lee YS. Simvastatin inhibits induction of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in rat alveolar macrophages exposed to cigarette smoke extract. Exp Mol Med. 2009;41:277–287. doi: 10.3858/emm.2009.41.4.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Kimmelman AC, Hezel AF, Aguirre AJ, Zheng H, Paik JH, Ying H, Chu GC, Zhang JX, Sahin E, Yeo G, Ponugoti A, Nabioullin R, Deroo S, Yang S, Wang X, McGrath JP, Protopopova M, Ivanova E, Zhang J, Feng B, Tsao MS, Redston M, Protopopov A, Xiao Y, Futreal PA, Hahn WC, Klimstra DS, Chin L, DePinho RA. Genomic alterations link Rho family of GTPases to the highly invasive phenotype of pancreas cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:19372–19377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809966105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Kimura K, Ito M, Amano M, Chihara K, Fukata Y, Nakafuku M, Yamamori B, Feng J, Nakano T, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, Kaibuchi K. Regulation of myosin phosphatase by Rho and Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase) Science. 1996;273:245–248. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5272.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Kivipelto M, Solomon A, Winblad B. Statin therapy in Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:521–522. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70150-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Kjekshus J, Apetrei E, Barrios V, Bohm M, Cleland JG, Cornel JH, Dunselman P, Fonseca C, Goudev A, Grande P, Gullestad L, Hjalmarson A, Hradec J, Janosi A, Kamensky G, Komajda M, Korewicki J, Kuusi T, Mach F, Mareev V, McMurray JJ, Ranjith N, Schaufelberger M, Vanhaecke J, van Veldhuisen DJ, Waagstein F, Wedel H, Wikstrand J. Rosuvastatin in older patients with systolic heart failure. The New England journal of medicine. 2007;357:2248–2261. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Koarai A, Yanagisawa S, Sugiura H, Ichikawa T, Kikuchi T, Furukawa K, Akamatsu K, Hirano T, Nakanishi M, Matsunaga K, Minakata Y, Ichinose M. 25-Hydroxycholesterol enhances cytokine release and Toll-like receptor 3 response in airway epithelial cells. Respir Res. 2012;13:63. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Koch G, Benz C, Schmidt G, Olenik C, Aktories K. Role of Rho protein in lovastatin-induced breakdown of actin cytoskeleton. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1997;283:901–909. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Kovacs WJ, Olivier LM, Krisans SK. Central role of peroxisomes in isoprenoid biosynthesis. Prog Lipid Res. 2002;41:369–391. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7827(02)00002-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Koyuturk M, Ersoz M, Altiok N. Simvastatin induces proliferation inhibition and apoptosis in C6 glioma cells via c-jun N-terminal kinase. Neurosci Lett. 2004;370:212–217. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Koyuturk M, Ersoz M, Altiok N. Simvastatin induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cells: p53 and estrogen receptor independent pathway requiring signalling through JNK. Cancer Lett. 2007;250:220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Kozar K, Kaminski R, Legat M, Kopec M, Nowis D, Skierski JS, Koronkiewicz M, Jakobisiak M, Golab J. Cerivastatin demonstrates enhanced antitumor activity against human breast cancer cell lines when used in combination with doxorubicin or cisplatin. Int J Oncol. 2004;24:1149–1157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Krauth MT, Majlesi Y, Sonneck K, Samorapoompichit P, Ghannadan M, Hauswirth AW, Baghestanian M, Schernthaner GH, Worda C, Muller MR, Sperr WR, Valent P. Effects of various statins on cytokine-dependent growth and IgE-dependent release of histamine in human mast cells. Allergy. 2006;61:281–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.00997.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Kraynack NC, Corey DA, Elmer HL, Kelley TJ. Mechanisms of NOS2 regulation by Rho GTPase signaling in airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002;283:L604–L611. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00459.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Kreiselmeier NE, Kraynack NC, Corey DA, Kelley TJ. Statin-mediated correction of STAT1 signaling and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in cystic fibrosis epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2003;285:L1286–L1295. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00127.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Krysko O, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV, Bachert C. Impairment of phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and its role in chronic airway diseases. Apoptosis. 2010;15:1137–1146. doi: 10.1007/s10495-010-0504-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Kuhn EW, Liakopoulos OJ, Stange S, Deppe AC, Slottosch I, Choi YH, Wahlers T. Preoperative statin therapy in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of 90 000 patients. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2013 doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Kusama T, Mukai M, Iwasaki T, Tatsuta M, Matsumoto Y, Akedo H, Inoue M, Nakamura H. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme a reductase inhibitors reduce human pancreatic cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:308–317. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.31093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Kusama T, Mukai M, Tatsuta M, Matsumoto Y, Nakamura H, Inoue M. Selective inhibition of cancer cell invasion by a geranylgeranyltransferase-I inhibitor. Clinical & experimental metastasis. 2003;20:561–567. doi: 10.1023/a:1025898316728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Lahousse L, Loth DW, Joos GF, Hofman A, Leufkens HG, Brusselle GG, Stricker BH. Statins, systemic inflammation and risk of death in COPD: the Rotterdam study. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013;26:212–217. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2012.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Lamarche N, Tapon N, Stowers L, Burbelo PD, Aspenstrom P, Bridges T, Chant J, Hall A. Rac and Cdc42 induce actin polymerization and G1 cell cycle progression independently of p65PAK and the JNK/SAPK MAP kinase cascade. Cell. 1996;87:519–529. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81371-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Lambrecht BN, Hammad H. Death at the airway epithelium in asthma. Cell Res. 2013;23:588–589. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Lamprecht J, Wojcik C, Jakobisiak M, Stoehr M, Schrorter D, Paweletz N. Lovastatin induces mitotic abnormalities in various cell lines. Cell Biol Int. 1999;23:51–60. doi: 10.1006/cbir.1998.0322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Lantuejoul S, Brambilla E, Brambilla C, Devouassoux G. Statin-induced fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2002;19:577–580. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00258802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Lawes CM, Thornley S, Young R, Hopkins R, Marshall R, Chan WC, Jackson G. Statin use in COPD patients is associated with a reduction in mortality: a national cohort study. Prim Care Respir J. 2012;21:35–40. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Lee CS, Yi EH, Lee JK, Won C, Lee YJ, Shin MK, Yang YM, Chung MH, Lee JW, Sung SH, Ye SK. Simvastatin suppresses RANTES-mediated neutrophilia in polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid-induced pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2013;41:1147–1156. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00050612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Lee HM, Lee J, Lee K, Luo Y, Sin DD, Wong ND. Relation between COPD severity and global cardiovascular risk in US adults. Chest. 2012;142:1118–1125. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Lee JH, Lee DS, Kim EK, Choe KH, Oh YM, Shim TS, Kim SE, Lee YS, Lee SD. Simvastatin inhibits cigarette smoking-induced emphysema and pulmonary hypertension in rat lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172:987–993. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200501-041OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Lee TM, Chen CC, Shen HN, Chang NC. Effects of pravastatin on functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary hypertension. Clin Sci (Lond) 2009;116:497–505. doi: 10.1042/CS20080241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Lee TM, Lin MS, Chang NC. Usefulness of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 as predictors of outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving pravastatin. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:530–535. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.09.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Lerner EC, Zhang TT, Knowles DB, Qian Y, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Inhibition of the prenylation of K-Ras, but not H- or N-Ras, is highly resistant to CAAX peptidomimetics and requires both a farnesyltransferase and a geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitor in human tumor cell lines. Oncogene. 1997;15:1283–1288. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Lev S, Gilburd B, Lahat N, Shoenfeld Y. Prevention of tumor spread by matrix metalloproteinase-9 inhibition: old drugs, new concept. Eur J Intern Med. 2002;13:101–103. doi: 10.1016/s0953-6205(02)00011-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Lewis KA, Holstein SA, Hohl RJ. Lovastatin alters the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway in acute myelogenous leukemia cells in vivo. Leuk Res. 2005;29:527–533. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2004.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Li M, Li Z, Sun X. Statins suppress MMP2 secretion via inactivation of RhoA/ROCK pathway in pulmonary vascular smooth muscles cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;591:219–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.06.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Li XR, Ji F, Ouyang J, Wu W, Qian LY, Yang KY. Overexpression of RhoA is associated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:1130–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Liao JK. Isoprenoids as mediators of the biological effects of statins. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:285–288. doi: 10.1172/JCI16421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Liao Y, Zhao H, Ogai A, Kato H, Asakura M, Kim J, Asanuma H, Minamino T, Takashima S, Kitakaze M. Atorvastatin slows the progression of cardiac remodeling in mice with pressure overload and inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor activation. Hypertens Res. 2008;31:335–344. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Liscum L, Finer-Moore J, Stroud RM, Luskey KL, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Domain structure of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, a glycoprotein of the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:522–530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Liu C, Zuo J, Janssen LJ. Regulation of airway smooth muscle RhoA/ROCK activities by cholinergic and bronchodilator stimuli. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:703–711. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00025506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Liu J, Shen Q, Wu Y. Simvastatin prevents cardiac hypertrophy in vitro and in vivo via JAK/STAT pathway. Life Sci. 2008;82:991–996. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2008.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Lokhandwala T, West-Strum D, Banahan BF, Bentley JP, Yang Y. Do statins improve outcomes in patients with asthma on inhaled corticosteroid therapy? A retrospective cohort analysis. BMJ Open. 2012;2 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Lorenowicz MJ, Fernandez-Borja M, van Stalborch AM, van Sterkenburg MA, Hiemstra PS, Hordijk PL. Microtubule dynamics and Rac-1 signaling independently regulate barrier function in lung epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007;293:L1321–L1331. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00443.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Lu Q, Sakhatskyy P, Grinnell K, Newton J, Ortiz M, Wang Y, Sanchez-Esteban J, Harrington EO, Rounds S. Cigarette smoke causes lung vascular barrier dysfunction via oxidative stress-mediated inhibition of RhoA and focal adhesion kinase. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2011;301:L847–L857. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00178.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Luan Z, Chase AJ, Newby AC. Statins inhibit secretion of metalloproteinases-1, -2, -3, and -9 from vascular smooth muscle cells and macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:769–775. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000068646.76823.AE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Luskey KL. Regulation of cholesterol synthesis: mechanism for control of HMG CoA reductase. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1988;44:35–51. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-571144-9.50006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Ma L, Liu YP, Geng CZ, Wang XL, Wang YJ, Zhang XH. Over expression of RhoA is associated with progression in invasive breast duct carcinoma. Breast J. 2010;16:105–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00860.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Ma L, Teruya-Feldstein J, Weinberg RA. Tumour invasion and metastasis initiated by microRNA-10b in breast cancer. Nature. 2007;449:682–688. doi: 10.1038/nature06174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Mackay DJ, Esch F, Furthmayr H, Hall A. Rho- and rac-dependent assembly of focal adhesion complexes and actin filaments in permeabilized fibroblasts: an essential role for ezrin/radixin/moesin proteins. J Cell Biol. 1997;138:927–938. doi: 10.1083/jcb.138.4.927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Mancini GB. Clarion call for trials assessing "cardiopulmonary" agents to reduce morbidity and mortality in inflammatory lung diseases. Chest. 2007;131:950–951. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Mancini GB, Etminan M, Zhang B, Levesque LE, FitzGerald JM, Brophy JM. Reduction of morbidity and mortality by statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2554–2560. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Maneechotesuwan K, Ekjiratrakul W, Kasetsinsombat K, Wongkajornsilp A, Barnes PJ. Statins enhance the anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients through increased induction of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:754–762. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.005. e751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Manne V, Yan N, Carboni JM, Tuomari AV, Ricca CS, Brown JG, Andahazy ML, Schmidt RJ, Patel D, Zahler R, et al. Bisubstrate inhibitors of farnesyltransferase: a novel class of specific inhibitors of ras transformed cells. Oncogene. 1995;10:1763–1779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Manukyan M, Nalbant P, Luxen S, Hahn KM, Knaus UG. RhoA GTPase activation by TLR2 and TLR3 ligands: connecting via Src to NF-kappa B. J Immunol. 2009;182:3522–3529. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Marin L, Colombo P, Bebawy M, Young PM, Traini D. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patho-physiology, current methods of treatment and the potential for simvastatin in disease management. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8:1205–1220. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2011.588697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Marin L, Traini D, Bebawy M, Colombo P, Buttini F, Haghi M, Ong HX, Young P. Multiple dosing of simvastatin inhibits airway mucus production of epithelial cells: Implications in the treatment of chronic obstructive airway pathologies. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;84:566–572. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Marks PW, Kwiatkowski DJ. Genomic organization and chromosomal location of murine Cdc42. Genomics. 1996;38:13–18. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Matzno S, Yasuda S, Juman S, Yamamoto Y, Nagareya-Ishida N, Tazuya-Murayama K, Nakabayashi T, Matsuyama K. Statin-induced apoptosis linked with membrane farnesylated Ras small G protein depletion, rather than geranylated Rho protein. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2005;57:1475–1484. doi: 10.1211/jpp.57.11.0014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Maynor M, Scott SA, Rickert EL, Gibbs RA. Synthesis and evaluation of 3- and 7-substituted geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate analogs. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters. 2008;18:1889–1892. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. McDonald VM, Higgins I, Wood LG, Gibson PG. Multidimensional assessment and tailored interventions for COPD: respiratory utopia or common sense? Thorax. 2013;68:691–694. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. McDougall JA, Malone KE, Daling JR, Cushing-Haugen KL, Porter PL, Li CI. Long-term statin use and risk of ductal and lobular breast cancer among women 55 to 74 years of age. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22:1529–1537. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. McKay A, Leung BP, McInnes IB, Thomson NC, Liew FY. A novel anti-inflammatory role of simvastatin in a murine model of allergic asthma. J Immunol. 2004;172:2903–2908. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.2903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. McLean DS, Ravid S, Blazing M, Gersh B, Shui A, Cannon CP. Effect of statin dose on incidence of atrial fibrillation: data from the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) and Aggrastat to Zocor (A to Z) trials. American heart journal. 2008;155:298–302. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. McTaggart SJ. Isoprenylated proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:255–267. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5298-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Melbye H, Halvorsen DS, Hartz I, Medbo A, Brox J, Eggen AE, Njolstad I. Bronchial airflow limitation, smoking, body mass index, and statin use are strongly associated with the C-reactive protein level in the elderly. The Tromso Study 2001. Respir Med. 2007;101:2541–2549. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Melo AC, Valenca SS, Gitirana LB, Santos JC, Ribeiro ML, Machado MN, Magalhaes CB, Zin WA, Porto LC. Redox markers and inflammation are differentially affected by atorvastatin, pravastatin or simvastatin administered before endotoxin-induced acute lung injury. Int Immunopharmacol. 2013;17:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2013.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Menzies D, Nair A, Meldrum KT, Fleming D, Barnes M, Lipworth BJ. Simvastatin does not exhibit therapeutic anti-inflammatory effects in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119:328–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Mihos CG, Salas MJ, Santana O. The pleiotropic effects of the hydroxy-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors in cardiovascular disease: a comprehensive review. Cardiol Rev. 2010;18:298–304. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181f52a7f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Mo H, Elson CE. Studies of the isoprenoid-mediated inhibition of mevalonate synthesis applied to cancer chemotherapy and chemoprevention. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2004;229:567–585. doi: 10.1177/153537020422900701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Monick MM, Powers LS, Butler NS, Hunninghake GW. Inhibition of Rho family GTPases results in increased TNF-alpha production after lipopolysaccharide exposure. J Immunol. 2003;171:2625–2630. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.5.2625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Montecucco F, Quercioli A, Mirabelli-Badenier M, Viviani GL, Mach F. Statins in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:68–76. doi: 10.2174/138920112798868737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Moon C, Lee YJ, Park HJ, Chong YH, Kang JL. N-acetylcysteine inhibits RhoA and promotes apoptotic cell clearance during intense lung inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:374–387. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200907-1061OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Moore M, Marroquin BA, Gugliotta W, Tse R, White SR. Rho kinase inhibition initiates apoptosis in human airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;30:379–387. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2003-0019OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Morimoto K, Janssen WJ, Fessler MB, McPhillips KA, Borges VM, Bowler RP, Xiao YQ, Kench JA, Henson PM, Vandivier RW. Lovastatin enhances clearance of apoptotic cells (efferocytosis) with implications for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Immunol. 2006;176:7657–7665. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.12.7657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Morimoto K, Janssen WJ, Fessler MB, Xiao YQ, McPhillips KA, Borges VM, Kench JA, Henson PM, Vandivier RW. Statins enhance clearance of apoptotic cells through modulation of Rho-GTPases. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3:516–517. doi: 10.1513/pats.200603-073MS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Morris CR, Poljakovic M, Lavrisha L, Machado L, Kuypers FA, Morris SM., Jr Decreased arginine bioavailability and increased serum arginase activity in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:148–153. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200309-1304OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Mortensen EM, Copeland LA, Pugh MJ, Restrepo MI, de Molina RM, Nakashima B, Anzueto A. Impact of statins and ACE inhibitors on mortality after COPD exacerbations. Respir Res. 2009;10:45. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-10-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Muessel MJ, Scott KS, Friedl P, Bradding P, Wardlaw AJ. CCL11 and GM-CSF differentially use the Rho GTPase pathway to regulate motility of human eosinophils in a three-dimensional microenvironment. J Immunol. 2008;180:8354–8360. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.12.8354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Muller WA. Mechanisms of leukocyte transendothelial migration. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:323–344. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  253. Muniyappa R, Xu R, Ram JL, Sowers JR. Inhibition of Rho protein stimulates iNOS expression in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;278:H1762–H1768. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.6.H1762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  254. Murphy DM, Forrest IA, Corris PA, Johnson GE, Small T, Jones D, Fisher AJ, Egan JJ, Cawston TE, Ward C, Lordan JL. Simvastatin attenuates release of neutrophilic and remodeling factors from primary bronchial epithelial cells derived from stable lung transplant recipients. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;294:L592–L599. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00386.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Ni J, Dong Z, Han W, Kondrikov D, Su Y. The role of RhoA and cytoskeleton in myofibroblast transformation in hyperoxic lung fibrosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;61C:26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  256. Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG, Bojesen SE. Statin use and reduced cancer-related mortality. N Engl J Med. 2013;367:1792–1802. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. Niessner H, Beck D, Sinnberg T, Lasithiotakis K, Maczey E, Gogel J, Venturelli S, Berger A, Mauthe M, Toulany M, Flaherty K, Schaller M, Schadendorf D, Proikas-Cezanne T, Schittek B, Garbe C, Kulms D, Meier F. The farnesyl transferase inhibitor lonafarnib inhibits mTOR signaling and enforces sorafenib-induced apoptosis in melanoma cells. The Journal of investigative dermatology. 2011;131:468–479. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  258. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Brown BG, Ganz P, Vogel RA, Crowe T, Howard G, Cooper CJ, Brodie B, Grines CL, DeMaria AN. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2004;291:1071–1080. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.9.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  259. Nubel T, Dippold W, Kleinert H, Kaina B, Fritz G. Lovastatin inhibits Rho-regulated expression of E-selectin by TNFalpha and attenuates tumor cell adhesion. Faseb J. 2004;18:140–142. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0261fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  260. O’Dwyer PJ, Gallagher M, Nguyen B, Waddell MJ, Chiorean EG. Phase I accelerated dose-escalating safety and pharmacokinetic (pk) study of ggti-2418, a novel geranylgeranyltransferasei inhibitor in patients with refractory solid tumors. Ann oncol. 2010;21 [Google Scholar]
  261. Ohkanda J, Blaskovich MA, Sebti SM, Hamilton AD. The development of protein farnesyltransferase inhibitors as signaling-based anticancer agents. Progress in cell cycle research. 2003;5:211–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Oka M, Fagan KA, Jones PL, McMurtry IF. Therapeutic potential of RhoA/Rho kinase inhibitors in pulmonary hypertension. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;155:444–454. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  263. Oleksy A, Opalinski L, Derewenda U, Derewenda ZS, Otlewski J. The molecular basis of RhoA specificity in the guanine nucleotide exchange factor PDZ-RhoGEF. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:32891–32897. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606220200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Osborne TF, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. 5' end of HMG CoA reductase gene contains sequences responsible for cholesterol-mediated inhibition of transcription. Cell. 1985;42:203–212. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80116-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  265. Ou XM, Feng YL, Wen FQ, Huang XY, Xiao J, Wang K, Wang T. Simvastatin attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121:1821–1829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  266. Ou XM, Wen FQ, Uhal BD, Feng YL, Huang XY, Wang T, Wang K, Liu DS, Wang X, Chen L. Simvastatin attenuates experimental small airway remodelling in rats. Respirology. 2009;14:734–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01549.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  267. Pan J, You Y, Huang T, Brody SL. RhoA-mediated apical actin enrichment is required for ciliogenesis and promoted by Foxj1. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:1868–1876. doi: 10.1242/jcs.005306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. Panini SR, Schnitzer-Polokoff R, Spencer TA, Sinensky M. Sterol-independent regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase by mevalonate in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Magnitude and specificity. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:11044–11052. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Park HJ, Kong D, Iruela-Arispe L, Begley U, Tang D, Galper JB. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors interfere with angiogenesis by inhibiting the geranylgeranylation of RhoA. Circ Res. 2002;91:143–150. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000028149.15986.4c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Pastey MK, Crowe JE, Jr, Graham BS. RhoA interacts with the fusion glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus and facilitates virus-induced syncytium formation. J Virol. 1999;73:7262–7270. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.9.7262-7270.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Patel DV, Schmidt RJ, Biller SA, Gordon EM, Robinson SS, Manne V. Farnesyl diphosphate-based inhibitors of Ras farnesyl protein transferase. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 1995;38:2906–2921. doi: 10.1021/jm00015a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Pedersen TR, Wilhelmsen L, Faergeman O, Strandberg TE, Thorgeirsson G, Troedsson L, Kristianson J, Berg K, Cook TJ, Haghfelt T, Kjekshus J, Miettinen T, Olsson AG, Pyorala K, Wedel H. Follow-up study of patients randomized in the Scandinavian simvastatin survival study (4S) of cholesterol lowering. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:257–262. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00910-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Perez-Sala D. Protein isoprenylation in biology and disease: general overview and perspectives from studies with genetically engineered animals. Front Biosci. 2007;12:4456–4472. doi: 10.2741/2401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Planaguma A, Pfeffer MA, Rubin G, Croze R, Uddin M, Serhan CN, Levy BD. Lovastatin decreases acute mucosal inflammation via 15-epi-lipoxin A4. Mucosal Immunol. 2010;3:270–279. doi: 10.1038/mi.2009.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  275. Pliquett RU, Cornish KG, Peuler JD, Zucker IH. Simvastatin normalizes autonomic neural control in experimental heart failure. Circulation. 2003;107:2493–2498. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000065606.63163.B9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  276. Pontillo A, Paoluzzi E, Crovella S. The inhibition of mevalonate pathway induces upregulation of NALP3 expression: new insight in the pathogenesis of mevalonate kinase deficiency. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:844–847. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  277. Popoff MR, Geny B. Multifaceted role of Rho, Rac, Cdc42 and Ras in intercellular junctions, lessons from toxins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1788:797–812. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  278. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1349–1357. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811053391902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  279. Prior IA, Lewis PD, Mattos C. A comprehensive survey of Ras mutations in cancer. Cancer Res. 2012;72:2457–2467. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  280. Pu YS, Wang CW, Liu GY, Kuo YZ, Huang CY, Kang WY, Shun CT, Lin CC, Wu WJ, Hour TC. Down-regulated expression of RhoA in human conventional renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:2039–2043. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  281. Rajpathak SN, Kumbhani DJ, Crandall J, Barzilai N, Alderman M, Ridker PM. Statin therapy and risk of developing type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes care. 2009;32:1924–1929. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  282. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) Lancet. 1994;344:1383–1389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Rao S, Lowe M, Herliczek TW, Keyomarsi K. Lovastatin mediated G1 arrest in normal and tumor breast cells is through inhibition of CDK2 activity and redistribution of p21 and p27, independent of p53. Oncogene. 1998;17:2393–2402. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  284. Raper A, Kolansky DM, Cuchel M. Treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia: is there a need beyond statin therapy? Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2012;14:11–16. doi: 10.1007/s11883-011-0215-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  285. Rearick JI, Hesterberg TW, Jetten AM. Human bronchial epithelial cells synthesize cholesterol sulfate during squamous differentiation in vitro. J Cell Physiol. 1987;133:573–578. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041330320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  286. Reed RM, Eberlein M, Girgis RE, Hashmi S, Iacono A, Jones S, Netzer G, Scharf S. Coronary artery disease is under-diagnosed and under-treated in advanced lung disease. Am J Med. 2012;125:1228 e1213–1228 e1222. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  287. Rennard SI. Clinical approach to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2005;2:94–100. doi: 10.1513/pats.200410-051SF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  288. Richens TR, Linderman DJ, Horstmann SA, Lambert C, Xiao YQ, Keith RL, Boe DM, Morimoto K, Bowler RP, Day BJ, Janssen WJ, Henson PM, Vandivier RW. Cigarette smoke impairs clearance of apoptotic cells through oxidant-dependent activation of RhoA. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179:1011–1021. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200807-1148OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  289. Ridker PM, Cannon CP, Morrow D, Rifai N, Rose LM, McCabe CH, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. The New England journal of medicine. 2005;352:20–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  290. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM, Jr, Kastelein JJ, Koenig W, Libby P, Lorenzatti AJ, MacFadyen JG, Nordestgaard BG, Shepherd J, Willerson JT, Glynn RJ. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008a;359:2195–2207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  291. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM, Jr, Kastelein JJ, Koenig W, Libby P, Lorenzatti AJ, MacFadyen JG, Nordestgaard BG, Shepherd J, Willerson JT, Glynn RJ. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. The New England journal of medicine. 2008b;359:2195–2207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  292. Ridley AJ. Rho family proteins: coordinating cell responses. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11:471–477. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(01)02153-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  293. Ridley AJ. Rho GTPases and actin dynamics in membrane protrusions and vesicle trafficking. Trends Cell Biol. 2006;16:522–529. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  294. Robinson AJ, Kashanin D, O'Dowd F, Fitzgerald K, Williams V, Walsh GM. Fluvastatin and lovastatin inhibit granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor-stimulated human eosinophil adhesion to inter-cellular adhesion molecule-1 under flow conditions. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39:1866–1874. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03334.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  295. Ross KR, Darrah RJ, Hodges CA, Lang L, Kelley TJ. Increased Expression of RhoA in Epithelium and Smooth Muscle of Obese Mouse Models: Implications for Isoprenoid Control of Airway Smooth Muscle and Fibroblasts. J Allergy (Cairo. 2013;2013:740973. doi: 10.1155/2013/740973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  296. Rowinsky EK, Windle JJ, Von Hoff DD. Ras protein farnesyltransferase: A strategic target for anticancer therapeutic development. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 1999;17:3631–3652. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  297. Saad N, Camus P, Suissa S, Ernst P. Statins and the risk of interstitial lung disease: a cohort study. Thorax. 2013;68:361–364. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  298. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JD, Cole TG, Brown L, Warnica JW, Arnold JM, Wun CC, Davis BR, Braunwald E. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. The New England journal of medicine. 1996;335:1001–1009. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610033351401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  299. Sakamoto N, Hayashi S, Mukae H, Vincent R, Hogg JC, van Eeden SF. Effect of atorvastatin on PM10-induced cytokine production by human alveolar macrophages and bronchial epithelial cells. Int J Toxicol. 2009;28:17–23. doi: 10.1177/1091581809333140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  300. Sakoda K, Yamamoto M, Negishi Y, Liao JK, Node K, Izumi Y. Simvastatin decreases IL-6 and IL-8 production in epithelial cells. J Dent Res. 2006;85:520–523. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  301. Samson KT, Minoguchi K, Tanaka A, Oda N, Yokoe T, Okada S, Yamamoto Y, Watanabe Y, Yamamoto M, Ohta S, Adachi M. Effect of fluvastatin on apoptosis in human CD4+ T cells. Cell Immunol. 2005;235:136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2005.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  302. Samson KT, Minoguchi K, Tanaka A, Oda N, Yokoe T, Yamamoto Y, Yamamoto M, Ohta S, Adachi M. Inhibitory effects of fluvastatin on cytokine and chemokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with allergic asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36:475–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02470.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  303. Sashio T, Kume H, Takeda N, Asano T, Tsuji S, Kondo M, Hasegawa Y, Shimokata K. Possible Involvement of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate/G(i)/RhoA pathways in adherence of eosinophils to pulmonary endothelium. Allergol Int. 2012;61:283–293. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.10-OA-0299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  304. Sato N, Fukui T, Taniguchi T, Yokoyama T, Kondo M, Nagasaka T, Goto Y, Gao W, Ueda Y, Yokoi K, Minna JD, Osada H, Kondo Y, Sekido Y. RhoB is frequently downregulated in non-small-cell lung cancer and resides in the 2p24 homozygous deletion region of a lung cancer cell line. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:543–551. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  305. Sawafuji M, Ishizaka A, Kohno M, Koh H, Tasaka S, Ishii Y, Kobayashi K. Role of Rho-kinase in reexpansion pulmonary edema in rabbits. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005;289:L946–L953. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00188.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  306. Schaafsma D, Bos IS, Zuidhof AB, Zaagsma J, Meurs H. Inhalation of the Rho-kinase inhibitor Y-27632 reverses allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness after the early and late asthmatic reaction. Respir Res. 2006;7:121. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-7-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  307. Schaafsma D, Bos IS, Zuidhof AB, Zaagsma J, Meurs H. The inhaled Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632 protects against allergen-induced acute bronchoconstriction, airway hyperresponsiveness, and inflammation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;295:L214–L219. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00498.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  308. Schaafsma D, Dueck G, Ghavami S, Kroeker A, Mutawe MM, Hauff K, Xu FY, McNeill KD, Unruh H, Hatch GM, Halayko AJ. The mevalonate cascade as a target to suppress extracellular matrix synthesis by human airway smooth muscle. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;44:394–403. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2010-0052OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  309. Schaafsma D, Gosens R, Zaagsma J, Halayko AJ, Meurs H. Rho kinase inhibitors: a novel therapeutical intervention in asthma? Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;585:398–406. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  310. Schaafsma D, Roscioni SS, Meurs H, Schmidt M. Monomeric G-proteins as signal transducers in airway physiology and pathophysiology. Cell Signal. 2008;20:1705–1714. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  311. Schaefer CA, Kuhlmann CR, Gast C, Weiterer S, Li F, Most AK, Neumann T, Backenkohler U, Tillmanns H, Waldecker B, Wiecha J, Erdogan A. Statins prevent oxidized low-density lipoprotein- and lysophosphatidylcholine-induced proliferation of human endothelial cells. Vascul Pharmacol. 2004;41:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2004.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  312. Schroll S, Lange TJ, Arzt M, Sebah D, Nowrotek A, Lehmann H, Wensel R, Pfeifer M, Blumberg FC. Effects of simvastatin on pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension and exercise capacity in bleomycin-treated rats. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2013;208:191–201. doi: 10.1111/apha.12085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  313. Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, Ganz P, Oliver MF, Waters D, Zeiher A, Chaitman BR, Leslie S, Stern T. Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2001;285:1711–1718. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.13.1711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  314. Sebti SM, Hamilton AD. Inhibition of Ras prenylation: a novel approach to cancer chemotherapy. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 1997;74:103–114. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(97)00014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  315. Sebti SM, Hamilton AD. Farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitors in cancer therapy: important mechanistic and bench to bedside issues. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2000;9:2767–2782. doi: 10.1517/13543784.9.12.2767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  316. Seeger H, Wallwiener D, Mueck AO. Statins can inhibit proliferation of human breast cancer cells in vitro. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2003;111:47–48. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  317. Seminario-Vidal L, Okada SF, Sesma JI, Kreda SM, van Heusden CA, Zhu Y, Jones LC, O'Neal WK, Penuela S, Laird DW, Boucher RC, Lazarowski ER. Rho signaling regulates pannexin 1-mediated ATP release from airway epithelia. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:26277–26286. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.260562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  318. Sever PS, Dahlof B, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers G, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT, Mehlsen J, Nieminen M, O'Brien E, Ostergren J. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial--Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361:1149–1158. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12948-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  319. Sheng X, Murphy MJ, MacDonald TM, Schembri S, Simpson W, Winter J, Winter JH, Wei L. Effect of statins on total cholesterol concentrations, cardiovascular morbidity, and all-cause mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study. Clin Ther. 2012;34:374–384. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  320. Sheng X, Murphy MJ, MacDonald TM, Wei L. The comparative effectiveness of statin therapy in selected chronic diseases compared with the remaining population. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:712. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  321. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Isles CG, Lorimer AR, MacFarlane PW, McKillop JH, Packard CJ. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995a;333:1301–1307. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199511163332001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  322. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Isles CG, Lorimer AR, MacFarlane PW, McKillop JH, Packard CJ. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. The New England journal of medicine. 1995b;333:1301–1307. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199511163332001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  323. Shi J, Wei L. Rho kinase in the regulation of cell death and survival. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2007;55:61–75. doi: 10.1007/s00005-007-0009-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  324. Shibata Y, Kamata T, Kimura M, Yamashita M, Wang CR, Murata K, Miyazaki M, Taniguchi M, Watanabe N, Nakayama T. Ras activation in T cells determines the development of antigen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness and eosinophilic inflammation. J Immunol. 2002;169:2134–2140. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.4.2134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  325. Shimada K, Park JK, Daida H. T helper 1/T helper 2 balance and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome: statins as immunomodulatory agents? Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2916–2918. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  326. Silva D, Couto M, Delgado L, Moreira A. A systematic review of statin efficacy in asthma. J Asthma. 2012;49:885–894. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.721433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  327. Silveira AA, Dominical VM, Lazarini M, Costa FF, Conran N. Simvastatin abrogates inflamed neutrophil adhesive properties, in association with the inhibition of Mac-1 integrin expression and modulation of Rho kinase activity. Inflamm Res. 2013;62:127–132. doi: 10.1007/s00011-012-0579-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  328. Simonet WS, Ness GC. Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of rat hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase by thyroid hormones. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:12448–12453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  329. Simons K, Ikonen E. How cells handle cholesterol. Science. 2000;290:1721–1726. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  330. Simons K, Vaz WL. Model systems, lipid rafts, and cell membranes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2004;33:269–295. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  331. Simpson KJ, Dugan AS, Mercurio AM. Functional analysis of the contribution of RhoA and RhoC GTPases to invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2004;64:8694–8701. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  332. Sin DD, Man SF. Why are patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at increased risk of cardiovascular diseases? The potential role of systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Circulation. 2003;107:1514–1519. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000056767.69054.b3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  333. Singh PP, Singh S. Statins are associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1721–1730. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  334. Singh S, Singh AG, Singh PP, Murad MH, Iyer PG. Statins are associated with reduced risk of esophageal cancer, particularly in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:620–629. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  335. Singh S, Singh PP. Statin a day keeps cancer at bay. World J Clin Oncol. 2013;4:43–46. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v4.i2.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  336. Singh S, Singh PP, Singh AG, Murad MH, Sanchez W. Statins are associated with a reduced risk of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:323–332. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  337. Slawinska A, Kandefer-Szerszen M. The anticancer properties of statins. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online) 2008;62:393–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  338. Solomon KR, Freeman MR. Do the cholesterol-lowering properties of statins affect cancer risk? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2008;19:113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  339. Soma MR, Corsini A, Paoletti R. Cholesterol and mevalonic acid modulation in cell metabolism and multiplication. Toxicol Lett. 1992;64–65(Spec No):1–15. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(92)90167-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  340. Soyseth V, Brekke PH, Smith P, Omland T. Statin use is associated with reduced mortality in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2007;29:279–283. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00106406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  341. Spampanato C, De Maria S, Sarnataro M, Giordano E, Zanfardino M, Baiano S, Carteni M, Morelli F. Simvastatin inhibits cancer cell growth by inducing apoptosis correlated to activation of Bax and down-regulation of BCL-2 gene expression. Int J Oncol. 2012;40:935–941. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2011.1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  342. Steffens S, Mach F. Anti-inflammatory properties of statins. Semin Vasc Med. 2004;4:417–422. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-869599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  343. Stein EA, Bays H, O'Brien D, Pedicano J, Piper E, Spezzi A. Lapaquistat acetate: development of a squalene synthase inhibitor for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2011;123:1974–1985. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.975284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  344. Stein W, Schrepfer S, Itoh S, Kimura N, Velotta J, Palmer O, Bartos J, Wang X, Robbins RC, Fischbein MP. Prevention of transplant coronary artery disease by prenylation inhibitors. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2011;30:761–769. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.01.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  345. Steinman L. State of the art. Four easy pieces: interconnections between tissue injury, intermediary metabolism, autoimmunity, and chronic degeneration. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3:484–486. doi: 10.1513/pats.200603-061MS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  346. Sugita M, Sugita H, Kaneki M. Farnesyltransferase inhibitor, manumycin a, prevents atherosclerosis development and reduces oxidative stress in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2007;27:1390–1395. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.140673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  347. Sugiura H, Koarai A, Ichikawa T, Minakata Y, Matsunaga K, Hirano T, Akamatsu K, Yanagisawa S, Furusawa M, Uno Y, Yamasaki M, Satomi Y, Ichinose M. Increased 25-hydroxycholesterol concentrations in the lungs of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology. 2012;17:533–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  348. Suissa S. Co-morbidity in COPD: the effects of cardiovascular drug therapies. Respiration. 2010;80:3–7. doi: 10.1159/000315387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  349. Sun J, Blaskovich MA, Knowles D, Qian Y, Ohkanda J, Bailey RD, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Antitumor efficacy of a novel class of non-thiol-containing peptidomimetic inhibitors of farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase I: combination therapy with the cytotoxic agents cisplatin, Taxol, and gemcitabine. Cancer research. 1999;59:4919–4926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  350. Sun J, Ohkanda J, Coppola D, Yin H, Kothare M, Busciglio B, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. Geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitor GGTI-2154 induces breast carcinoma apoptosis and tumor regression in H-Ras transgenic mice. Cancer research. 2003;63:8922–8929. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  351. Sun J, Qian Y, Chen Z, Marfurt J, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. The geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitor GGTI-298 induces hypophosphorylation of retinoblastoma and partner switching of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. A potential mechanism for GGTI-298 antitumor activity. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999;274:6930–6934. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.11.6930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  352. Swanson KM, Hohl RJ. Anti-cancer therapy: targeting the mevalonate pathway. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2006;6:15–37. doi: 10.2174/156800906775471743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  353. Takahashi S, Nakamura H, Seki M, Shiraishi Y, Yamamoto M, Furuuchi M, Nakajima T, Tsujimura S, Shirahata T, Nakamura M, Minematsu N, Yamasaki M, Tateno H, Ishizaka A. Reversal of elastase-induced pulmonary emphysema and promotion of alveolar epithelial cell proliferation by simvastatin in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;294:L882–L890. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00238.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  354. Takeda N, Kondo M, Ito S, Ito Y, Shimokata K, Kume H. Role of RhoA inactivation in reduced cell proliferation of human airway smooth muscle by simvastatin. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2006;35:722–729. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2006-0034OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  355. Taki F, Kume H, Kobayashi T, Ohta H, Aratake H, Shimokata K. Effects of Rho-kinase inactivation on eosinophilia and hyper-reactivity in murine airways by allergen challenges. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007;37:599–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  356. Terakado M, Gon Y, Sekiyama A, Takeshita I, Kozu Y, Matsumoto K, Takahashi N, Hashimoto S. The Rac1/JNK pathway is critical for EGFR-dependent barrier formation in human airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2011;300:L56–L63. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00159.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  357. Thannickal VJ, Hagood JS. Biological insights from clinical trials and networks. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:475–476. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201201-0047ED. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  358. Thomsen M, Dahl M, Lange P, Vestbo J, Nordestgaard BG. Inflammatory biomarkers and comorbidities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:982–988. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201206-1113OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  359. Thurberg BL, Collins T. The nuclear factor-kappa B/inhibitor of kappa B autoregulatory system and atherosclerosis. Current opinion in lipidology. 1998;9:387–396. doi: 10.1097/00041433-199810000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  360. Thurnher M, Nussbaumer O, Gruenbacher G. Novel aspects of mevalonate pathway inhibitors as antitumor agents. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:3524–3531. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  361. Tse SM, Charland SL, Stanek E, Herrera V, Goldfarb S, Litonjua AA, Weiss ST, Wu AC. Statin use in asthmatics on inhaled corticosteroids is associated with decreased risk of emergency department visits. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.865599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  362. Tse SM, Li L, Butler MG, Fung V, Kharbanda EO, Larkin EK, Vollmer WM, Miroshnik I, Rusinak D, Weiss ST, Lieu T, Wu AC. Statin exposure is associated with decreased asthma-related emergency department visits and oral corticosteroid use. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:1076–1082. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201306-1017OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  363. Turner SJ, Zhuang S, Zhang T, Boss GR, Pilz RB. Effects of lovastatin on Rho isoform expression, activity, and association with guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;75:405–413. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.08.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  364. Uchida S, Watanabe G, Shimada Y, Maeda M, Kawabe A, Mori A, Arii S, Uehata M, Kishimoto T, Oikawa T, Imamura M. The suppression of small GTPase rho signal transduction pathway inhibits angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;269:633–640. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  365. Undas A, Kaczmarek P, Sladek K, Stepien E, Skucha W, Rzeszutko M, Gorkiewicz-Kot I, Tracz W. Fibrin clot properties are altered in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Beneficial effects of simvastatin treatment. Thromb Haemost. 2009;102:1176–1182. doi: 10.1160/TH09-02-0118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  366. Undem C, Rios EJ, Maylor J, Shimoda LA. Endothelin-1 augments Na(+)/H(+) exchange activity in murine pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells via Rho kinase. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  367. van Gestel YR, Hoeks SE, Sin DD, Huzeir V, Stam H, Mertens FW, van Domburg RT, Bax JJ, Poldermans D. COPD and cancer mortality: the influence of statins. Thorax. 2009;64:963–967. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.116731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  368. Vance JE. Dysregulation of cholesterol balance in the brain: contribution to neurodegenerative diseases. Dis Model Mech. 2012;5:746–755. doi: 10.1242/dmm.010124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  369. Varker KA, Phelps SH, King MM, Williams CL. The small GTPase RhoA has greater expression in small cell lung carcinoma than in non-small cell lung carcinoma and contributes to their unique morphologies. Int J Oncol. 2003;22:671–681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  370. Vigano T, Hernandez A, Corsini A, Granata A, Belloni P, Fumagalli R, Paoletti R, Folco G. Mevalonate pathway and isoprenoids regulate human bronchial myocyte proliferation. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995;291:201–203. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(95)90143-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  371. Vogt A, Sun J, Qian Y, Hamilton AD, Sebti SM. The geranylgeranyltransferase-I inhibitor GGTI-298 arrests human tumor cells in G0/G1 and induces p21(WAF1/CIP1/SDI1) in a p53-independent manner. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1997;272:27224–27229. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.43.27224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  372. Walter RE, Wilk JB, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Keaney JF, Jr, Lipinska I, O'Connor GT, Benjamin EJ. Systemic inflammation and COPD: the Framingham Heart Study. Chest. 2008;133:19–25. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  373. Wang IK, Lin-Shiau SY, Lin JK. Induction of apoptosis by lovastatin through activation of caspase-3 and DNase II in leukaemia HL-60 cells. Pharmacol Toxicol. 2000;86:83–91. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0773.2000.d01-16.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  374. Wang MT, Lo YW, Tsai CL, Chang LC, Malone DC, Chu CL, Liou JT. Statin Use and Risk of COPD Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization. Am J Med. 2013;126:598–606. e592. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  375. Wang W, Le W, Ahuja R, Cho DY, Hwang PH, Upadhyay D. Inhibition of inflammatory mediators: role of statins in airway inflammation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144:982–987. doi: 10.1177/0194599811400367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  376. Wang W, Song W, Wang Y, Chen L, Yan X. HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin and Atorvastatin, Downregulate ABCG1-mediated Cholesterol Efflux in Human Macrophages. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2013;62:90–98. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3182927e7c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  377. Wasko BM, Dudakovic A, Hohl RJ. Bisphosphonates induce autophagy by depleting geranylgeranyl diphosphate. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2011;337:540–546. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.175521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  378. Watts KL, Cottrell E, Hoban PR, Spiteri MA. RhoA signaling modulates cyclin D1 expression in human lung fibroblasts; implications for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res. 2006;7:88. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-7-88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  379. Watts KL, Spiteri MA. Connective tissue growth factor expression and induction by transforming growth factor-beta is abrogated by simvastatin via a Rho signaling mechanism. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004;287:L1323–L1332. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00447.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  380. Weis M, Heeschen C, Glassford AJ, Cooke JP. Statins have biphasic effects on angiogenesis. Circulation. 2002;105:739–745. doi: 10.1161/hc0602.103393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  381. Weitz-Schmidt G. Lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 blockade by statins: molecular basis and biological relevance. Endothelium. 2003;10:43–47. doi: 10.1080/10623320303360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  382. Weitz-Schmidt G, Welzenbach K, Brinkmann V, Kamata T, Kallen J, Bruns C, Cottens S, Takada Y, Hommel U. Statins selectively inhibit leukocyte function antigen-1 by binding to a novel regulatory integrin site. Nat Med. 2001;7:687–692. doi: 10.1038/89058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  383. Wells CM, Ahmed T, Masters JR, Jones GE. Rho family GTPases are activated during HGF-stimulated prostate cancer-cell scattering. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2005;62:180–194. doi: 10.1002/cm.20095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  384. Wettschureck N, Offermanns S. Rho/Rho-kinase mediated signaling in physiology and pathophysiology. J Mol Med (Berl) 2002;80:629–638. doi: 10.1007/s00109-002-0370-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  385. Wheeler AP, Ridley AJ. Why three Rho proteins? RhoA, RhoB, RhoC, and cell motility. Exp Cell Res. 2004;301:43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  386. Wierzbicki AS. Synthetic statins: more data on newer lipid-lowering agents. Curr Med Res Opin. 2001;17:74–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  387. Witzenrath M, Ahrens B, Schmeck B, Kube SM, Hippenstiel S, Rosseau S, Hamelmann E, Suttorp N, Schutte H. Rho-kinase and contractile apparatus proteins in murine airway hyperresponsiveness. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2008;60:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  388. Wong CC, Wong CM, Tung EK, Au SL, Lee JM, Poon RT, Man K, Ng IO. The microRNA miR-139 suppresses metastasis and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by down-regulating Rho-kinase 2. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:322–331. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  389. Wong WW, Dimitroulakos J, Minden MD, Penn LZ. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and the malignant cell: the statin family of drugs as triggers of tumor-specific apoptosis. Leukemia. 2002;16:508–519. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  390. Wright JL, Zhou S, Preobrazhenska O, Marshall C, Sin DD, Laher I, Golbidi S, Churg AM. Statin reverses smoke-induced pulmonary hypertension and prevents emphysema but not airway remodeling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:50–58. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201003-0399OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  391. Wu S, Duan S, Zhao S, Cai Y, Chen P, Fang X. Atorvastatin reduces lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human pulmonary epithelial cells. Respir Res. 2005;6:27. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-6-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  392. Xiao H, Li DX, Liu M. Knowledge translation: airway epithelial cell migration and respiratory diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69:4149–4162. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1044-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  393. Xiao H, Qin X, Ping D, Zuo K. Inhibition of Rho and Rac geranylgeranylation by atorvastatin is critical for preservation of endothelial junction integrity. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  394. Xing XQ, Duan S, Wu XW, Gan Y, Zhao SP, Chen P, Wu SJ. Atorvastatin reduces lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of C-reactive protein in human lung epithelial cells. Mol Med Rep. 2011;4:753–757. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2011.491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  395. Xu JF, Washko GR, Nakahira K, Hatabu H, Patel AS, Fernandez IE, Nishino M, Okajima Y, Yamashiro T, Ross JC, Estepar RS, Diaz AA, Li HP, Qu JM, Himes BE, Come CE, D'Aco K, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Lynch DA, Crapo JD, Morse D, Ryter SW, Silverman EK, Rosas IO, Choi AM, Hunninghake GM. Statins and pulmonary fibrosis: the potential role of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:547–556. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201108-1574OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  396. Xu L, Dong XW, Shen LL, Li FF, Jiang JX, Cao R, Yao HY, Shen HJ, Sun Y, Xie QM. Simvastatin delivery via inhalation attenuates airway inflammation in a murine model of asthma. Int Immunopharmacol. 2012;12:556–564. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2012.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  397. Yagi Y, Otani H, Ando S, Oshiro A, Kawai K, Nishikawa H, Araki H, Fukuhara S, Inagaki C. Involvement of Rho signaling in PAR2-mediated regulation of neutrophil adhesion to lung epithelial cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;536:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  398. Yamashita M, Kimura M, Kubo M, Shimizu C, Tada T, Perlmutter RM, Nakayama T. T cell antigen receptor-mediated activation of the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway controls interleukin 4 receptor function and type-2 helper T cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:1024–1029. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.3.1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  399. Yan N, Ricca C, Fletcher J, Glover T, Seizinger BR, Manne V. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors block the neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) malignant phenotype. Cancer research. 1995;55:3569–3575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  400. Yano M, Matsumura T, Senokuchi T, Ishii N, Murata Y, Taketa K, Motoshima H, Taguchi T, Sonoda K, Kukidome D, Takuwa Y, Kawada T, Brownlee M, Nishikawa T, Araki E. Statins activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma through extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent cyclooxygenase-2 expression in macrophages. Circ Res. 2007;100:1442–1451. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000268411.49545.9c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  401. Yeh YF, Huang SL. Enhancing effect of dietary cholesterol and inhibitory effect of pravastatin on allergic pulmonary inflammation. J Biomed Sci. 2004;11:599–606. doi: 10.1007/BF02256124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  402. Yilmaz A, Reiss C, Weng A, Cicha I, Stumpf C, Steinkasserer A, Daniel WG, Garlichs CD. Differential effects of statins on relevant functions of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2006;79:529–538. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0205064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  403. Young RP, Hopkins R, Eaton TE. Pharmacological actions of statins: potential utility in COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2009a;18:222–232. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00005309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  404. Young RP, Hopkins R, Eaton TE. Potential benefits of statins on morbidity and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of the evidence. Postgrad Med J. 2009b;85:414–421. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.078477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  405. Yuan C, Zhou L, Cheng J, Zhang J, Teng Y, Huang M, Adcock IM, Barnes PJ, Yao X. Statins as potential therapeutic drug for asthma? Respir Res. 2012;13:108. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  406. Zammit VA, Easom RA. Regulation of hepatic HMG-CoA reductase in vivo by reversible phosphorylation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987;927:223–228. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(87)90138-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  407. Zeki AA, Bratt JM, Rabowsky M, Last JA, Kenyon NJ. Simvastatin inhibits goblet cell hyperplasia and lung arginase in a mouse model of allergic asthma: a novel treatment for airway remodeling? Transl Res. 2010;156:335–349. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2010.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  408. Zeki AA, Franzi L, Last J, Kenyon NJ. Simvastatin inhibits airway hyperreactivity: implications for the mevalonate pathway and beyond. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:731–740. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200901-0018OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  409. Zeki AA, Kenyon NJ, Goldkorn T. Statin drugs, metabolic pathways, and asthma: a therapeutic opportunity needing further research. Drug Metab Lett. 2011;5:40–44. doi: 10.2174/187231211794455217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  410. Zeki AA, Oldham J, Wilson M, Fortenko O, Goyal V, Last M, Last A, Patel A, Last JA, Kenyon NJ. Statin use and asthma control in patients with severe asthma. BMJ Open. 2013;3 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  411. Zeki AA, Thai P, Kenyon NJ, Wu R. Differential effects of simvastatin on IL-13-induced cytokine gene expression in primary mouse tracheal epithelial cells. Respir Res. 2012;13:38. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  412. Zhang C, Zhou F, Li N, Shi S, Feng X, Chen Z, Hang J, Qiu B, Li B, Chang S, Wan J, Shao K, Xing X, Tan X, Wang Z, Xiong M, He J. Overexpression of RhoE has a prognostic value in non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2628–2635. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9457-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  413. Zhang J, Yang Z, Xie L, Xu L, Xu D, Liu X. Statins, autophagy and cancer metastasis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45:745–752. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  414. Zhang L, Gallup M, Zlock L, Finkbeiner WE, McNamara NA. Rac1 and Cdc42 differentially modulate cigarette smoke-induced airway cell migration through p120-catenin-dependent and -independent pathways. Am J Pathol. 2013;182:1986–1995. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  415. Zhang W, Du L, Gunst SJ. The effects of the small GTPase RhoA on the muscarinic contraction of airway smooth muscle result from its role in regulating actin polymerization. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010;299:C298–C306. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00118.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  416. Zhao YD, Cai L, Mirza MK, Huang X, Geenen DL, Hofmann F, Yuan JX, Zhao YY. Protein kinase G-I deficiency induces pulmonary hypertension through Rho A/Rho kinase activation. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:2268–2275. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  417. Zhou J, Zhu Y, Zhang G, Liu N, Sun L, Liu M, Qiu M, Luo D, Tang Q, Liao Z, Zheng Y, Bi F. A distinct role of RhoB in gastric cancer suppression. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:1057–1068. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  418. Zhou Q, Liao JK. Statins and cardiovascular diseases: from cholesterol lowering to pleiotropy. Curr Pharm Des. 2009;15:467–478. doi: 10.2174/138161209787315684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  419. Zhou Q, Liao JK. Pleiotropic effects of statins. - Basic research and clinical perspectives. Circ J. 2010;74:818–826. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  420. Zhu T, Zhang W, Wang DX, Huang NW, Bo H, Deng W, Deng J. Rosuvastatin attenuates mucus secretion in a murine model of chronic asthma by inhibiting the gammaaminobutyric acid type A receptor. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;125:1457–1464. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES