Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to investigate the profile of sensitization to silkworm moth (Bombyx mori) and other 9 common inhalant allergens among patients with allergic diseases in southern China.
Methods
A total of 175 patients were tested for serum sIgE against silkworm moth in addition to combinations of other allergens: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, Blomia tropicalis, Blattella germanica, Periplaneta americana, cat dander, dog dander, Aspergillus fumigatus and Artemisia vulgaris by using the ImmunoCAP system. Correlation between sensitization to silkworm moth and to the other allergens was analyzed.
Results
Of the 175 serum samples tested, 86 (49.14%) were positive for silkworm moth sIgE. With high concordance rates, these silkworm moth sensitized patients were concomitantly sensitized to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (94.34%), Dermatophagoides farinae (86.57%), Blomia tropicalis (93.33%), Blattella germanica (96.08%), and Periplaneta americana (79.41%). Moreover, there was a correlation in serum sIgE level between silkworm moth and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (r = 0.518), Dermatophagoides farinae (r = 0.702), Blomia tropicalis (r = 0.701), Blattella germanica (r = 0.878), and Periplaneta americana (r = 0.531) among patients co-sensitized to silkworm moth and each of these five allergens.
Conclusion
In southern Chinese patients with allergic diseases, we showed a high prevalence of sensitization to silkworm moth, and a co-sensitization between silkworm moth and other five common inhalant allergens. Further serum inhibition studies are warranted to verify whether cross-reactivity exists among these allergens.
Introduction
Recent studies in China and Western countries have indicated that airborne insect allergens play an equally important role as pollens and fungi in the incidence and development of allergic diseases [1]–[4]. Among various insects, silkworm moth (Bombyx mori) was identified as an important inhalant allergen in several studies worldwide [5]–[7]. In southern China where insects grow well in hot and humid climates, previous local epidemiological study in Guangzhou (unpublished data) showed that up to 40% of patients with respiratory allergy were sensitized to silkworm moth, and the prevalence of sensitization to silkworm moth was one of leading causes of allergy, immediately ranked after house dust mites and before cockroaches. This is interesting because silkworm moth is domesticated and is traditionally perceived as an occupational allergen found in silk-producing industries [8], [9]. In fact, silk has been described as a cause of asthma due to contact with bedcovers containing wild silk or silk waste [10]. Recent reports have found that silk waste from wild silk has become an important indoor allergen due to its use in a variety of other household products such as fillings in jackets, bed quilts and pillows [11]–[13]. Borelli and colleagues identified a patient who developed asthma while wearing a China made silk cardigan [14]. In a study by Wen CM et al, 64 children were found to carry silk-induced asthma with no occupational origin [15]. Therefore a high rate of sensitization to silkworm moth in a population beyond silk-workers should prompt a high probability of co-sensitization (defined as simultaneous sensitization to two or more allergens in a frequency higher than the chance expectation) or cross-reactivity among silkworm moth and other allergens. Unfortunately, there is little information available regarding silkworm moth-specific IgE level in Chinese patients and whether co-sensitization or cross reactivity exists between the silkworm moth and other common inhalant allergens. The present study was a retrospective evaluation of serum specific IgE (sIgE) against silkworm moth and 9 common inhalant allergens among patients from a large respiratory clinic in Guangzhou, southern China. We analyzed the pattern of correlation and the probability of co-sensitization or cross-reactivity between silkwom moth and these allergens.
Materials and Methods
Study Subjects
Between February 2010 and February 2013, among all patients who visited the Respiratory Clinic of First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, the largest respiratory medical center in southern China, 5230 were referred for determination of serum specific IgE (sIg E) against common allergens in our laboratory for confirmatory diagnosis of allergic diseases. These subjects had been clinically confirmed to have allergic symptoms (including skin rashes, hives, red or itchy eyes, eczema, stuffy or runny nose, and sneezing), and were subsequently tested for different combinations of allergens, as decided individually by their attending physicians and indicated on a uniform order sheet. In total, the test for silkworm moth sIgE was ordered for 175 of these 5230 patients (81 males and 94 females), in addition to other allergen tests they received. These 175 patients fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) a confirmed diagnosis of allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, and/or chronic cough based on their clinical symptoms; and (2) a self-reported history of sneezing, eye itching, nasal congestion, runny nose or skin rash when exposed to dusts or insects. None of these subjects had: (1) known immunodeficiency, (2) clinically significant disorders of the lung, heart or liver, (3) a medical history or family history of chronic respiratory diseases, or (4) a history of respiratory infections or use of systemic corticosteroids during the previous 30 days. Based on medical record, all these 175 subjects came from the four large administrative districts of Guangzhou proper (Dongshan, Yuexiu, Haizhu and Baiyun Districts), thus representing a wide range of metropolitan coverage. The mean age of these patients was 45.42±18.93 years (range, 5–85 years). Table 1 shows the number of subjects tested for sIgE against silkworm moth and 9 other common inhalant allergens including Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p), Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f), Blomia tropicalis, Blattella germanica, Periplaneta americana, cat dander, dog dander, Aspergillus fumigatus and Artemisia vulgaris.
Table 1. The number of serum samples tested for both silkworm moth and 9 common inhalant allergens.
Tested allergens | Samples tested for both Bombyx mori and the allergen | % of samples tested for both Bombyx more and the allergen among 175 subjects |
Der p | 84 | 48% |
Der f | 152 | 87% |
Blomia tropicalis | 54 | 31% |
Blattella germanica | 77 | 44% |
Periplaneta americana | 37 | 21% |
cat dander | 103 | 59% |
dog dander | 101 | 58% |
Aspergillus fumigatus | 79 | 45% |
Artemisia vulgaris | 95 | 54% |
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University (Approval No.: GYFYY-2010-01-17). Written informed consent was obtained from all adults and from the parents or legal guardians of the children participating in this study.
Specific IgE Measurement
Serum samples (5 ml from each of the 175 subjects) were tested for allergen-specific IgEs with the ImmunoCAP System (Themo Fisher, Clayton, NC, USA) according to the instructed procedures by the manufacturer. Based on the indication by the attending physicians, these 175 subjects were tested for sIgEs against silkworm moth and at least one of nine other allergens common in southern China, including Der p, Der f, Blomia tropicalis, Blattella germanica, Periplaneta americana, cat dander, dog dander, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Artemisia vulgaris. The sIgE level was calculated with a standard curve and expressed as concentration of kU/L. Based on the concentration, serum sIgE response to allergen was divided into 6 classes, namely class 0, <0.35 KU/L; class 1, ≥0.35 to <0.7 KU/L; class 2, ≥0.7 to <3.5 KU/L; class 3, ≥3.5 to <17.5 KU/L; class 4, ≥17.5 to <50 KU/L; class 5, ≥50 to <100 KU/L; and class 6, ≥100 KU/L. Responses with a sIgE level of ≥0.35 KU/L (class 1 or above) were defined as positive.
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed with SPSS ver16.0 software package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Chi-square test was used to determine the between-group differences of numerical data, and Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to test between-group correlations. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Sensitization to Silkworm Moth and 9 Common Inhalant Allergens
Of the 175 serum samples, 86 (49.14%) tested positive for silkworm moth-specific IgE. Based on the indication by attending physicians, they were also tested for sIgE against at least one of other 9 common inhalant allergens (Table 1). As shown in Table 2, the percentage of co-sensitization to silkworm moth were found in 59.52% of the subjects who tested positive for Der p, 38.16% for Der f, 51.85% for Blomia tropicalis, 63.64% for Blattella germanica, 72.97% for Periplaneta americana, 10.89% for dog dander, 7.77% for cat dander, 6.33% for Aspergillus fumigatus, and 4.21% for Artemisia vulgaris. These results can divide the sIgE response to silkworm moth and to the 9 common inhalant allergens into two concordance groups. The high concordance group, with a concordance rate ≥50%, comprised Der p (94.34%), Der f (86.57%), Blomia tropicalis (93.33%), Blattella germanica (96.08%), and Periplaneta americana (79.41%). The low concordance group which had a concordance rate <50% comprised cat dander (19.0%), dog dander (26%), Aspergillus fumigatus (16.13%), and Artemisia vulgaris (11.11%). A significant difference between these two groups was demonstrated by the chi-square test (P<0.001).
Table 2. Concordance in specific IgE detection results between silkworm moth and 9 common inhalant allergens.
Allergens | Co-sensitization to silkwormmoth (%) | Overall concordancerate (%) | Positive concordancerate (%) | Negative concordancerate (%) | Chi-square | Pvalue |
Der p | 59.52 | 86.9 | 94.34 | 74.19 | 1.45 | 0.23 |
Der f | 38.16 | 84.21 | 86.57 | 82.35 | 1.04 | 0.31 |
Blomia tropicalis | 51.85 | 88.89 | 93.33 | 83.33 | 0.17 | 0.68 |
Blattella germanica | 63.64 | 93.51 | 96.08 | 88.46 | 0 | 1 |
Periplaneta americana | 72.97 | 78.38 | 79.41 | 66.67 | 3.13 | 0.08 |
cat dander | 7.77 | 66.02 | 19.05 | 98.36 | 29.26 | <0.001 |
dog dander | 10.89 | 68.32 | 26.19 | 98.31 | 26.27 | <0.001 |
Aspergillus fumigatus | 6.33 | 63.29 | 16.13 | 93.75 | 16.69 | <0.001 |
Artemisia vulgaris | 4.21 | 64.21 | 11.11 | 96.61 | 24.74 | <0.001 |
Serum sIgE Levels and Correlation Analysis on Sensitization to Silkworm and the High-concordance Group Allergens (with Concordance Rate ≥50%)
Figures 1a to 1e show the results of Spearman rank correlation analysis. The level of sIgE against silkworm moth was highly correlated with those against Der p (r = 0.518), Der f (r = 0.702), Blomia tropicalis (r = 0.701), Blattella germanica (r = 0.878) and Periplaneta americana (r = 0.531) (all P<0.01). Figures 2a to 2e show the percentages of patients sensitized to silkworm moth (Bombyx mori) and five common inhalant allergens according to serum sIgE level. For those who were co-sensitized to silkworm moth and mites, 27.4% of Der p and 12.5% of Der f positive patients had sIgE concentration ≥50 KU/L (classes 5 and 6) (Figures 2a, 2b); in contrast, only 1.19% and 0.66% of the silkworm moth sensitized patients had ≥50 KU/L sIgE for Der p and Der f, respectively. In patients co-sensitized to silkworm moth and Blomia tropicalis, none of them had sIgE level higher than 50 KU/L (Figure 2c).
As for cockroaches (Figures 2d and 2e), only 1.3% of Blattella germanica- and 2.7% of Periplaneta americana-positive patients co-sensitized to silkworm moth had ≥50 KU/L sIgE against moth.
Noticeably, in these five subgroups of high-concordance sensitization (Figure 2), the level of sIgE against silkworm moth was mostly below 50 KU/L; none of the patients sensitized to Blomia tropicalis, Blattella germanica or Periplaneta americana had sIgE >50 KU/L.
Discussion
Cultivated silkworm (Bombyx mori) and wild silkworm (Antheraea spp) are the main sources of silk for manufacture of fabrics. During the production process, while silk threads go through several processes that can denature their allergenic proteins, silk waste is normally less carefully processed and retains antigenicity. In fact, it has been shown that a Chinese silk waste product intended for filling bed mattresses could contain several IgE-binding allergens in the range from 14 to 70 kD [16].
Unlike house dust mites, cockroaches, pet dander, molds, and pollens, silkworm moth is seldom reported in the literature with respect to its allergenicity and relationship with allergic diseases. Recently, sensitization to silkworm moth in southern China tends to be increasingly recognized in clinical practice, indicating a need to investigate whether the silkworm moth is also a common inhalant allergen. According to Li and colleagues, secretions, metabolites, setae, and scales of living moths, as well as the debris and lysates of dead moths, may be airborne triggers for allergic asthma and rhinitis [17]. In their study, 60 patients with asthma and 440 healthy forestry workers were skin prick tested with moth allergens, with the positive rates being 58.3% and 8.2% in the two groups, respectively [17]. When skin prick tests for a bigger panel of allergens were performed to further examine the allergic profile, they found that moth had the third highest positive rate after house dusts and house dust mites [18]. This observation is in accordance with our present finding that the positive rate of serum moth-specific IgE was 49.14% among allergic patients, suggesting that silkworm moth is an important inhalant insect allergen in Guangzhou area and the sensitization to silkworm moth may be closely related to allergic diseases, such as allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis.
Based on the correlation analysis, high concordance and strong correlation in positive sIgE reactivity was found between silkworm moth and other five common inhalant allergens (Der p, Der f, Blomia tropicalis, Blattella germanica, and Periplaneta americana), but not with another four inhalant allergens tested (cat dander, dog dander, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Artemisia vulgaris). The difference was statistically significant to show a co-sensitization pattern existing between silkworm moth and the five inhalant allergens from the high-concordance group among patients with allergic diseases in southern China. However, the current co-sensitization remains insufficient to demonstrate the presence of cross-reactivity between moth and these allergens.
Liu and colleagues has suggested a cross-reactivity between silkworm moth and cockroach and that arginine kinase may be the major cross-reactive antigenic component between the two insects [19]. Arginine kinase has also been confirmed to be responsible for the antigenic cross-reactivity among arthropods, such as shrimp [20], [21] and shellfish [22]. Although there were very few reports regarding whether a cross-reaction exists between silkworm moth and mites [23], [24], intra- and interspecies cross-reactivities among allergens from mites and cockroaches have been widely recognized. Twarog [25] showed the presence of cross-reactive antigens between Periphlaneta americana and Blattella germanica. Wu and colleagues demonstrated that the crude extracts of Blattella germanica, Periplaneta americana, Blattella orientalis, and Blattella asahinai contained common IgE-binding components [26]. A previous immunochemical study has reported cross-reactivity existing between house dust mites and snails, crustaceans, cockroaches, chironomids, and other mite allergens [27]. In the majority of related studies [7], [23], [28]–[30], house dust mite extracts proved to be a powerful inhibitor for the cross-inhibition tests, suggesting that it is the main source of many allergens resulting in hypersensitivity. The similar pattern was found in Chinese patients by Sun et al. [23] that 88% of the cockroach-positive patients were concurrently sensitized to Der p.
While many cross reactivity studies have been conducted on Der p and Der f, less information is available for Blomia tropicalis, one of the commonest mite species in tropical regions. Sporadic data have shown cross-reactivity between Blomia tropicalis and various mites, including Der p, Lepidoglyphus destructor, Suidasia medanensis, Blomia kulagini, and Euroglyphus maynei [29]–[33], as well as between Ascaris and tropomyosins from house dust mites and cockroaches [34]–[36].
In the present study, concurrent IgE sensitization was observed between silkworm moth and other 5 common inhalant allergens in allergic patients from southern China. Our findings provide serum sIgE data showing that silkworm moth is an important allergen for respiratory allergies in the region and a positive correlation exists between silkworm moth and the relevant mites and cockroaches. We acknowledge that owing to the retrospective nature of the study, we cannot conclude on the cross-reaction between these allergens. Further serum inhibition studies are warranted to verify such relationship, and if so, it would be worthwhile to find out whether it is attributed to arginine kinase.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to Hammer Tsui for his assistance in editing issues and critical evaluation of this manuscript. Mr. Tsui declares no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
The authors have no financial issues related to this article. This work was supported by Guangdong Industry Technology and Development Fund (Project No.: 2011B061200040), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (Project No.: S2013010014728) and Science Foundation of Guangzhou Medical University (Project No.:2013A06). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. No additional external funding received for this study.
References
- 1. Bircher AJ (2005) Systemic immediate allergic reactions to arthropod stings and bites. Dermatology 210: 119–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Spiegel W, Maier H, Maier M (2004) A non-infectious airborne disease. Lancet 363: 1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sun BQ, Zheng PY, Zhang XW, Huang HM, Chen DH, et al. (2014) Prevalence of Allergen Sensitization among Patients with Allergic Diseases in Guangzhou, Southern China: A Four-year Observational Study. Multidiscip Respir Med 9: 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wu AY (2012) Immunotherapy - Vaccines for allergic diseases. J Thorac Dis 4(2): 198–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Okuda M, Usami A, Itoh H, Ogino S (2002) Nationwide investigation of insect allergy in patients with allergy rhinitis. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 105: 1181–1188 [in Japanese]. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 6. Larsson S, Backlund A (2009) Regarding the putative identity of a moth (Thaumetopoea spp.) allergen. Allergy 64: 493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fedoskova TG, Petrova MA, Tsyvkina GI, Ivanov VD, Makovetskaia AK (2005) Insect allergens in the human dwelling. Gig Sanit (3): 25–28 [in Russian]. [PubMed]
- 8.P Cullinan, Newman-Taylor AJ (1997) Aetiology of occupational asthma. Clin Exp Allergy (Suppl 1): 41–46. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 9. Harindranath N, Prakash O, Subba Rao PV (1985) Prevalence of occupational asthma in silk filatures. Ann Allergy 55: 511–515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Häcki M, Wüthrich B, Hanser M (1982) Wildseide: ein aggressives Inhalationsallergen. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 107: 166–169. [in German] [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11. Johansson SG, Wuthrich B, Zortea-Caflisch C (1985) Nightly asthma caused by allergens in silk-filled bed quilts: clinical and immunologic studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 75: 452–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wuthrich B,Dietschi R, Keter A, Zortea-Caflisch C (1985) So-called "wild silk"asthma–an ever current inhalation allergy to silk waste. Schweiz MedWochenschr 115: 1387–1393. [in German] [PubMed]
- 13.Ebner H, Kraft D (1987) Wild silk-induced asthma. A contribution to the knowledge of inhalation allergies caused by wild and tussah silk-filled bed quilts. Wien KlinWochenschr 99: 542–546. [in German] [PubMed]
- 14. Borelli S, Stern A, Wüthrich B (1999) A silk cardigan inducing asthma. Allergy 54: 900–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chaoming W, Shitai Y, Lixin Z, Yan Y (1990) Silk induced asthma in children: a report of 64 cases. Ann Allergy 65: 375–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Dewair M, BaurX, Ziegler K (1985) Use of immunoblot technique for detection of human IgE and IgG antibodies to individual silk proteins. J Allergy Clin Immunol 76: 537–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li CP (2000) Allergic asthma caused by Encleidae. Zhongguo Meijie Shengwuxue Ji Kongzhi Zazhi 11,225–228 [in Chinese].
- 18.Li CP (2000) Allergic rhinitis caused by Encleidae. Yixue Dongwu Fangzhi 16: 305–309 [in Chinese].
- 19. Liu Z, Xia L, Wu Y, Xia Q, Chen J, et al. (2009) Identification and characterization of an arginine kinase as a major allergen from silkworm (Bombyx mori) larvae. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 150: 8–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hoflehner E, Binder M, Hemmer W, Mahler V, Panzani RC, et al. (2012) Thioredoxin from the Indianmeal moth Plodia interpunctella: cloning and test of the allergenic potential in mice. PLoS One 7: e42026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Yu CJ, Lin YF, Chiang BL, Chow LP (2003) Proteomics and immunological analysis of a novel shrimp allergen, Pen m 2. J Immunol 170: 445–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lopata AL, O’Hehir RE, Lehrer SB (2010) Shellfish allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 40: 850–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sun BQ, Wei NL, Li J, Jiang M, Zhong NS (2008) Serum allergen profiles related to moth and house dust mite in cockroach-allergic patients in-vitro assay and correlation analysis. Guoji Huxi Zazhi 28: 193–196 [in Chinese].
- 24. Hales BJ, Laing IA, Pearce LJ, Hazell LA, Mills KL, et al. (2007) Distinctive immunoglobulin E anti-house dust allergen-binding specificities in a tropical Australian Aboriginal community. Clin Exp Allergy 37: 1357–1363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Twarog FJ, Picone FJ, Strunk RS, So J, Colten HR (1976) Immediate hypersensitivity to cockroach:isolation and purification of the major antigens. J Aller Clin Immunol 59: 154–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wu CH, Luo SF, Wong DW (1997) Analysis of cross-reactive allergens from American and German cockroaches by human IgE. Allergy 52: 411–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Aalberse RC, Kleine Budde I, Stapel SO, van Ree R (2001) Structural aspects of cross-reactivity and its relation to antibody affinity. Allergy 56: 27–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sun BQ, Lai XX, Gjesing B, Spangfort MD, Zhong NS (2010) The prevalence of sensitivity to cockroach allergens and IgE cross-reactivity between cockroach and house dust mite allergens in Chinese patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma. Chin Med J 123: 3540–3544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Cardona G, Guisantes J, Postigo I, Eraso E, Serna LA, et al. (2005) Allergenic cross-reactivity between Blomia tropicalis and Blomia kulagini (Acari: Echymiopodidae) extracts from optimized mite cultures. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 15: 259–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Puerta L, Lagares A, Mercado D, Fernández-Caldas E, Caraballo L (2005) Allergenic composition of the mite Suidasia medanensis and cross-reactivity with Blomia tropicalis . Allergy 60: 41–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chew FT, Yi FC, Chua KY, Fernandez-Caldas E, Arruda LK (1999) Allergenic differences between the domestic mites Blomia tropicalis and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus . Clin Exp Allergy 29: 982–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Morgan MS, Arlian LG, Fernandez-Caldas E (1996) Cross-allergenicity of the house dust mites Euroglyphus maynei and Blomia tropicalis . Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 77: 386–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Johansson E, Schmidt M, Johansson SG, Machado L, Olsson S (1997) Allergenic cross-reactivity between Lepidoglyphus destructor and Blomia tropicalis . Clin Exp Allergy 27: 691–699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Caraballo L, Acevedo N (2011) Allergy in the tropics: the impact of cross-reactivity between mites and ascaris. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 3: 51–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Acevedo N, Caraballo L (2011) IgE cross-reactivity between Ascaris lumbricoides and mite allergens: possible influences on allergic sensitization and asthma. Parasite Immunol 33: 309–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Santos AB, Rocha GM, Oliver C, Ferriani VP, Lima RC (2008) Cross-reactive IgE antibody responses to tropomyosins from Ascaris lumbricoides and cockroach. J Allergy Clin Immunol 121: 1040–1046.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]