Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2014 Mar 18;289(18):12446–12456. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.550723

miR-17-92 Cluster Targets Phosphatase and Tensin Homology and Ikaros Family Zinc Finger 4 to Promote TH17-mediated Inflammation*

Si-Qi Liu 1, Shan Jiang 1, Chaoran Li 1, Baojun Zhang 1, Qi-Jing Li 1,1
PMCID: PMC4007439  PMID: 24644282

Background: miRNA is a key component of post-transcriptional network governing the fate of T cells.

Results: By targeting PTEN and IKZF4, miR-17-92 cluster promotes TH17 differentiation and TH17-related inflammation.

Conclusion: miR-19b and miR-17 within the cluster additively promote TH17 responses through distinct regulatory networks.

Significance: Our study provides novel regulatory mechanisms and potential therapeutic candidates against autoimmunity.

Keywords: Autoimmunity, Cell Differentiation, Inflammation, MicroRNA, Pten, T Cell, IKZF4, Th17, miR-17-92

Abstract

The miR-17-92 cluster regulates a broad spectrum of biological processes of T cell immunity. This cluster was found to facilitate T cell proliferation, enhance antitumor activities and promote T cell-dependent antibody responses. However, little is known about the role of this miRNA cluster in the development of autoimmune diseases. Multiple sclerosis is a neuro-destructive autoimmune disease caused by the pathogenicity of TH17 cells, whose differentiation is tightly controlled by a variety of transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulators. Our study unveils the critical role of miR-17-92 in TH17 differentiation: T cell-specific miR-17-92 deficiency reduced TH17 differentiation and ameliorated experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) symptoms. We demonstrated that miR-17 and miR-19b are the two miRNAs in this cluster responsible for promoting TH17 responses. MiR-19b represses the expression of Phosphatase and Tensin Homology (PTEN), thereby augmenting the PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis essential for proper TH17 differentiation. Meanwhile, miR-17 enhances TH17 polarization by inhibiting a novel target, Ikaros Family Zinc Finger 4 (IKZF4). By establishing the miR-17-92 cluster as a key driver of TH17 responses, our data identify this miRNA cluster as a potential therapeutic target for the clinical intervention of multiple sclerosis.

Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs)2 are a class of small non-coding RNAs with versatile regulatory functions in eukaryotic cells. Mature miRNAs are mounted onto the RNA-induced silencing complex which interacts with a particular mRNA molecule. This process leads to translational repression and/or RNA decay of target mRNA (1). Dysregulated miRNA expression has been associated with a variety of immunological diseases (2), depicting miRNA's indispensable role in maintaining proper immune defense and immune homeostasis (35).

As a critical compartment of the adaptive immune system, CD4+ T cells are well recognized by their capability of differentiating into various T cell subtypes to accomplish different tasks: TH1 cells secrete IFNγ and are involved in anti-viral and anti-tumor immunity; TH2 cells produce IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 to defend against helminth infection; TH17 cells can produce IL-17, IL-22, and IL-23 and controls fungi invasion; T follicular helper cells (TFH) supports B cell affinity maturation to elicit proper humoral immunity; Tregs, on the other hand, downscale immune responses to prevent excessive inflammation (6).

Among the numerous immunoregulatory miRNA species, the miR-17-92 cluster had been suggested to play pivotal roles in the regulation of immune responses, including CD4+ T cell differentiation. MiR-17-92 was the first “oncomiR” ever identified: its expression was highly elevated in lymphoma B cell from cancer patients and its overexpression accelerated tumorigenesis (7); on the other hand, in the immune system, our group demonstrated that miR-17-92 is indispensable for anti-tumor CD4+ T cell responses by enhancing IFNγ-secreting TH1 differentiation and by supporting tumor-specific T cell survival and proliferation (8). These pro-inflammatory functions of this unique cluster were complemented by recent reports that miR-17-92 is essential for eliciting optimal antibody responses by affecting TFH differentiation (9, 10). Moreover, miR-17-92 also carries a mechanism that biases CD4+ T cells away from immune tolerant Treg induction. In the absence of miR-17-92, CD4+ T cells were poised for strong iTreg differentiation (8); and, thymic-derived Tregs critically rely on miR-17-92 for their IL-10 production and immune suppressive functions (11).

Although miR-17-92's regulatory functions have been elaborated in a variety of immunological responses, its effect in autoimmunity was not well established. Some evidence suggests this cluster may be involved in multiple sclerosis (MS), as one member of miR-17-92, miR-17 was shown to be up-regulated in MS patients (12). MS is an autoimmunity-mediated neuro-demyelination disease elicited by the activation of TH17 cells. Besides its pivotal role in anti-fungal responses, TH17 is also a pathogenic branch of CD4+ T cells contributing to the onset of various autoimmune diseases, including MS (1315). In MS patients, myelin specific TH17 cells infiltrate into the central nervous system (CNS) and produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as GM-CSF and IL-17 (16, 17). IL-17 secreted from TH17 cells can stimulate astrocytes and attract neutrophils to foster the inflammation (18). IL-17 was also shown to directly target glial cells, which potentially impedes myelin repair and aggravates disease progression (19). Because of the importance of TH17-mediated pathogenesis in MS, key regulators of TH17 differentiation have been extensively studied (20, 21). Transcriptional network mapping has uncovered the key modulators of TH17 lineage initiation, commitment and stabilization (22, 23). However, since the role of miR-17-92 in TH17 lineage is yet to be investigated, it is unclear whether this transcription factor network relates to the post-transcriptional regulatory network of miR-17-92.

In this study, we utilized a mouse strain in which miR-17-92 was specifically depleted in T cells. In combination with the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) mouse model of MS, we showed that loss of miR-17-92 resulted in impaired TH17 differentiation, which consequently reduced EAE pathogenesis. We further dissected this cluster and identified specific miRNAs executing the whole cluster's function. Through identification of their functionally relevant gene targets, we elucidated the molecular mechanism underlying these regulatory miRNAs.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Animals

miR-17-92f/f and Rag2−/− mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. CD4-Cre mice were purchased from Taconic. CD4+ T cell conditional miR-17-92 knock-out mice were generated by mating miR-17-92f/f and CD4-Cre mice and back-crossing to the C57BL/6 background. All animal-related procedures were conducted with the approval from the Duke University Animal Care and Use Committee.

In Vitro Cell Culture, TH17 Polarization and Retrovirus Infection

For in vitro cultures, total lymph nodes or spleen were collected from mice and single cell suspension was prepared. CD4+ Cells were then purified with Dynabeads® UntouchedTM Mouse CD4 Cells kit (Invitrogen). Cells were stimulated by 1 μg/ml plate-bond α-CD3 and α-CD28antibodies. 10 μg/ml α-IFNγ, 10 μg/ml α-IL-4, 50 ng/ml mouse IL-6, 4 ng/ml human TGFβ, 20 ng/ml mouse IL-1β, and 50 ng/ml IL-23 were added in the culture for TH17 polarization. Antibodies described above were purchased from BioXCell, and cytokines from Biolegend. PIK-75 (PI3K inhibitor) was purchased from EMD Biosciences (#528116) and was applied at the concentration of 25 nm. miRNA overexpression vectors were constructed with MSCV retrovirus backbone, and retroviruses were generated by transfecting the BOSC 23 packaging cell line. Viruses were harvested from the supernatant 48 h post-transfection. Retroviruses were then used to infect activated T cells by centrifugation at 1258 × g at 37 °C.

RT-qPCR, Luciferase Assay and Western Blot

RNA was extracted from cells by mirVanaTM miRNA Isolation kit (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription was performed using qScriptTM Flex cDNA kit (Quanta Biosciences). Quantitative PCR was conducted with PerfeCTa® SYBR® Green FastMix® (Quanta). 96-well qPCR array primers were synthesized from Integrated DNA Technologies. miRNA-target binding was predicted using online algorithm TargetScan. Luciferase reporter vector was constructed by cloning target 3′-UTR downstream of firefly luciferase. This vector also contains Renilla luciferase transcribed from a separate promoter. By normalizing firefly luciferase to Renilla luciferase, the repression efficacy of miRNA was assessed. Western blot was performed using Novex® 10% Tris-Glycin Gel (Invitrogen). Primary antibody α-IKZF4 was acquired from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc-292209), α-Actinβ from Sigma-Aldrich. Secondary antibody α-rabbit-Alexa Fluor 680 was purchased from Invitrogen.

Flow Cytometry

Flow cytometry antibodies were purchased from Biologend. For surface staining, the cells were harvested and stained in FACS buffer (PBS with 2% FBS and 2 mm EDTA). For intracellular cytokine staining, the cells were harvested and further stimulated with 500 ng/ml Ionomycin and 1 μm PdBU (Sigma Aldrich) in the presence of Golgi block Monensin and Brefeldin A (eBioscience) for 4 h, followed by fixation in 2% paraformaldehyde-PBS and permeabilization in 0.1% Saponin-FACS buffer. For Foxp3 stanining, cells were processed and stained with Foxp3 staining buffer kit (eBioscience). For intracellular IKZF4 staining, the cells were first fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde-PBS and permeabilized in 90% methanol-PBS. Subsequently, cells were subjected to primary rabbit-α-mouse IKZF4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and secondary antibody staining (Jackson Immunoresearch). Flow cytometry was conducted with BD FACSCantoTM II analyzer.

Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Induction

125 μg of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)35–55 peptide was emulsified in complete freund's adjuvant (CFA). The mix was injected into the mouse subcutaneously. 200 ng/mouse of pertussis toxin was injected intravenously on day 0 and day 2 postimmunization. Clinical score was assessed on a daily basis according to the extent of paralysis: no clinical symptoms (0); limp tail (1); weak paralysis of two hind limbs (2); complete paralysis of two hind limbs (3); paralysis of both hind and fore limbs (4); death (5).

Colitis Model

Mouse CD4+CD25CD45RBHi naïve T cells were sorted from donor mice and 0.5 million cells were injected into recipient mice intraperitoneally. Mouse body weights were monitored on a daily basis. At the experiment end-point, mice were sacrificed and the colon weight/length ratios were measured. Mesenteric lymph nodes and spleens were collected, and T cells were analyzed for intracellular expression of IL-17A and IFNγ expression by flow cytometry.

Statistics

Two-tailed Student's t tests were used to determine whether the means from two experimental groups were significantly different. p values of <0.05 was indicative of significant difference. In certain time-course studies, the difference between two groups were accessed via testing whether the regression slope were significantly different. p value of <0.05 indicates the samples of interest do not derive from a single population.

RESULTS

miR-17-92 Deficiency in CD4+ T Cells Leads to Impaired TH17 Differentiation in Vitro and Mitigates EAE Progression

To investigate the role of miR-17-92 cluster in the differentiation of TH17 cells, we employed the miR-17-92f/f-CD4-Cre conditional knock-out mouse as previously described (8). This mouse line features two loxp sites flanking the whole miRNA cluster (24), together with Cre expression under the control of CD4 promoter to ensure T cell-specific miR-17-92 depletion. With these mice, we first tested whether miR-17-92 cluster affects TH17 differentiation in vitro. Using plate-bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies, CD4+ T cells from total lymph nodes of either wild type (WT), miR-17-92 heterozygotes (f/+) or miR-17-92 knock-out (f/f) mouse were stimulated through their antigen receptors. The cells were cultured under TH17 polarization conditions to assess their differentiation capacity. TH17 differentiation of miR-17-92-deficient T cells was markedly decreased in vitro, as identified by reduced IL-17A production (Fig. 1A).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

MiR-17-92 deficiency in CD4+ T cells impairs TH17 differentiation and mitigates EAE progression. A, CD4+ T cells were isolated from wild type (WT), miR-17-92f/+-CD4-Cre (f/+), or miR-17-92f/f-CD4-Cre mice (f/f) mice and stimulated by anti-CD3ϵ and anti-CD28 for 5 days in TH17 skewing conditions, followed by intracellular staining for IL-17A and IFNγ and flow cytometry analysis. B, wild type (WT, n = 10) and miR-17-92f/f-CD4-Cre (KO, n = 5) mice were immunized with MOG peptide and injected with pertussis toxin to elicit EAE, and the clinical score is measured daily according to “Experimental Procedures.” C–F, cells from EAE day 26 mice were collected from spinal cord (SC), spleen (SPL), and lymph nodes (LN) and analyzed for T cell number (C), IL-17A, IFNγ expression (D, E), and Foxp3 expression (F). Statistics were done by unpaired Student's t test with error bars indicating S.E.

We next studied the impact of this impaired TH17 differentiation in vivo using the EAE mouse model of MS. Since TH17 cells are known to be the critical mediators of MS in human patients, we induced EAE in either wild-type (WT) mice or miR-17-92f/f-CD4-Cre (KO) mice. In KO mice, we observed alleviation in EAE symptoms, as indicated by reduced clinical scores (Fig. 1B). We found no significant differences in the numbers of pathological CD4+ T cells infiltrating the central nervous system (Fig. 1C). However, a closer examination at the effector function of these CD4+ T cells revealed that KO cells collected from the spinal cords and spleens of EAE mice had significantly diminished IL-17 expression (Fig. 1, D and E), together, the IL-17 producing cell number was also significantly decreased (supplemental Fig. S1). Consistent with our previous findings that miR-17-92 facilitates IFNγ production (8), we also observed a significant decrease in IFNγ producing T cells in the spinal cord. However, although the loss of miR-17-92 enhanced iTreg induction in vitro and within the tumor microenvironment (8), under our EAE inducing condition, we were unable to identify differences in Treg percentages between WT and KO mice, in both the spinal cords and spleens (Fig. 1F). Taken together, our data suggest that miR-17-92 is important for TH17 differentiation in vitro and TH17 responses in vivo and the ablation of this cluster mitigates EAE progression.

miR-17-92-deficient CD4+ T Cells Are Impaired in Colitis Induction

We next validated the function of miR-17-92 in TH17 induction using the colitis model. In lymphopenic Rag2−/− mouse, the adoptively transferred naïve CD4+ T cells become activated and differentiate into TH1 and TH17 lineages to induce colitis (25). We adoptively transferred CD4+CD25CD45RBHi naïve WT or KO T cells into the Rag2−/− hosts, and monitored their body weights daily. Compared with WT T cells, we found that KO T cells were ineffectual at eliciting colitis-induced weight loss: in recipients of KO T cells, weight loss was significantly retarded (Fig. 2A). In addition, the colon weight/length ratio, an indicator of colon inflammation severity, was significantly reduced in mice receiving KO T cells (Fig. 2B). Accordingly, H&E staining of the colon sections revealed stark differences between the two groups of recipient mice: in the colons of mice receiving WT T cells, there was drastic loss of villus integrity, together with substantial infiltration of inflammatory mononuclear cells into the villi, and, severe depletion of goblet cells; In the colons of mice receiving KO T cells, while mononuclear infiltration was present, the gross architecture of both villi and goblet cells remained intact (Fig. 2C). Further analysis revealed that miR-17-92 deletion results in significantly reduced accumulation of CD4+ cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes (Fig. 2D), which is likely a consequence of reduced proliferation and increased activation-induced apoptosis associated with miR-17-92 deletion (8). More importantly, while IFNγ production was comparable between two groups in this disease model (Fig. 2E), we observed suppressed IL-17A expression in transferred KO T cells (Fig. 2F). Notably, in our colitis model, iTreg differentiation was negligible in either WT or KO CD4+ T cell transfer (supplemental Fig. S2). Our data imply that miR-17-92 deficiency hinders the CD4+ cells' ability to induce colitis, potentially by reducing TH17 responses.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

miR-17-92deficient CD4+ T cells are impaired in colitis induction. A, CD4+CD25CD45RBHi naïve T cells were sorted from wild type (WT) and or miR-17-92f/f-CD4-Cre mice (KO) mice and adoptively transferred into Rag2−/− recipients. Body weights of WT and KO recipients were measured daily after T cell transfer, and were normalized to the initial body weight of each mouse. The left and right panels represent two independent experiments. B, colons were harvested from mice 11 days post WT or KO T cell transfer, and colon weight/length ratio (an indicator of colitis severity) was calculated. C, H&E staining of the colon sections of mice with WT or KO T cell transfer. Note the differences between the two groups, in terms of mononuclear cell infiltration (density of blue staining), numbers of goblet cells (cells with white vacuoles) and villus integrity. D—F, quantification of absolute CD4+ T cell numbers, IFNγ+ and IL-17A+ T cell percentages and cell numbers in the mesenteric lymph nodes of WT and KO groups. Statistics were calculated by unpaired Student's t test; error bars indicates S.E. Specifically, the p value of right panel in A was determined by testing whether there is a significant difference between the regression slopes of WT and KO group.

miR-17 and miR-19b Are Core Components in the Cluster that Promote TH17 Differentiation

To better understand the mechanism by which miR-17-92 cluster regulates TH17 differentiation, we dissected the contribution from individual miRNAs in this cluster. By utilizing retroviral vectors to overexpress individual miRNAs in miR-17-92 knock-out T cells, we were able to achieve miRNA expression above the wild type level (supplemental Fig. S3). We then found that two miRNAs, miR-17 and miR-19b, were most potent in rescuing the TH17 differentiation defect (Fig. 3, A and B). We then asked if miR-17 and miR-19b promotes TH17 differentiation in an additive or synergistic manner. To examine their combinatory effects, we designed a retroviral vector that expresses a miR-17-92 mutant, miR-1719b. miR-1719b harbors deletions of the miR-19a and miR-20a guide strands, and contains mutations covering the whole seed regions of miR-18 and miR-92. This allows us to overexpress miR-17 and miR-19b simultaneously in the context of their original cluster (Fig. 3C). Combined miR-17 and miR-19b expression demonstrated an additive effect in driving TH17 differentiation of KO CD4+ T cells in comparison to those cells expressing miR-17 or miR-19b alone (Fig. 3D). Accordingly, the transcription of il17a, il17f, and master regulator rorc were also highly induced by concurrent expression of miR-17 and miR-19b (Fig. 3D). Collectively, by breaking down the miR-17-92 cluster into individual miRNAs, we demonstrated that miR-17 and miR-19b are potentially the major players in promoting TH17 differentiation.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Dissection of miR-17-92 cluster shows miR-17 and miR-19b are core components in the cluster to promote TH17 differentiation. A and B, WT and KO cells (n = 5) were stimulated by anti-CD3ϵ and anti-CD28, and subsequently infected with retrovirus expressing empty vector (WT-MOCK and KO-MOCK) or overexpressing each miRNA (KO-miR). Representative of IL-17A and IFNγ staining were shown in A, and IL-17A+ percentage is normalized to KO-MOCK group and quantified in B. C, schematics of miR-1719b retrovirus construct. Seed region of miR-18 and miR-92 was mutated, miR-19a and miR-20a were removed. D, WT and KO T cells were stimulated and infected with MOCK or miR-1719b retrovirus as in A and B. mRNA level of IL-17A, IL-17F, and RORγt was quantified by RT-qPCR. Statistics was calculated by paired t test for B, with error bars indicating S.E.

miR-19b Enhances TH17 Differentiation by Targeting PTEN

We then examined how miR-19b functions to foster TH17 differentiation. We and others have validated phosphatase and tensin homology (PTEN) as a target of miR-19b in tumor cells, B cells, and CD4+ T cells (8, 26). By dephosphorylating PIP3, PTEN is well recognized as a negative regulator of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway (27). Importantly, recent studies imply that activation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway is essential for the induction of TH17 differentiation in vitro and in vivo (28). Therefore, we speculated that miR-19b promotes TH17 response through the inhibition of PTEN to enhance the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. We first confirmed that miR-19b overexpression is capable of down-regulating PTEN during the differentiation of TH17 cells (Fig. 4A). One direct consequence of PTEN dysregulation is the alteration of AKT activation, marked by the phosphorylation of two critical residues on AKT: threonine 308 (T308) and serine 473 (S473) (29). When we activated WT and KO CD4+ T cells via TCR stimulation under the TH17-differentiating conditions, we observed that both T308 and S473 phosphorylation were significantly retarded in KO cells (Fig. 4B). We then examined whether this miR-19b-mediated PTEN down-regulation is sufficient to influence TH17 differentiation. With a low dose of the selective inhibitor PIK-75, we specifically blocked the activity of p110α subunit of PI3 kinase to assess the contribution of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway for TH17 differentiation in miR-17-92 KO CD4+ T cells (30). We reasoned that the loss of miR-19b should already have accumulated sufficient PTEN in these KO cells to increase the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling threshold required for TH17 differentiation. Therefore, KO cells would be less susceptible to further pharmaceutical inhibition of PI3K. By differentiating CD4 T cells in vitro in the presence or absence of PIK-75, we could determine the inhibition index of TH17 differentiation (1-IL-17PIK-75/IL-17DMSO). While PIK-75 is still capable of reducing IL-17 production in KO CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4, C and D), the extent of reduction is significantly lower in these miR-17-92-deficient T cells (Fig. 4E). In addition, in the absence of PI3K inhibition, both miR-17 and miR-19b rescued KO cells' defect in Th17 differentiation (Fig. 4, C and D). However, in the presence of PI3K inhibition, the rescue by miR-17 and miR-19b differs significantly: rescue delivered by miR-19b depends on PI3K activation (Fig. 4, C and D) and is highly sensitive to PIK-75 treatment; rescue delivered by miR-17, which functions through a PTEN-independent mechanism (Fig. 4A), is more resistant to PI3K inhibition (Fig. 4E). Taken together, we concluded that miR-19b enhances TH17 differentiation by targeting PTEN.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

miR-19b enhances TH17 differentiation by targeting PTEN. A, CD4+ T cells were isolated from WT or miR-17-92f/f-CD4-Cre (KO) mice and stimulated in vitro in TH17 conditions and infected with MOCK, miR-17 or miR-19b overexpressing retrovirus for 5 days. Cell lysate was collected for Western blotting PTEN and β-actin. B, WT and KO CD4+ T cells were purified and starved for 2h in serum-free media, and subsequently stimulated with anti-CD3ϵ and anti-CD28 antibodies for 30min under TH17 conditions. Phosphorylation of AKT T308 and S473 in WT and KO CD4+ T cells were measured by flow cytometry. C, representative of WT-MOCK, KO-MOCK, KO-miR-17, and KO-miR-19b cell culture in TH17 skewing conditions and treated with DMSO or PIK-75. D, quantification of C, n = 4. E, inhibition index of PIK-75's inhibition efficiency on TH17 differentiation as calculated by 1-IL-17PIK-75/IL-17DMSO. Statistics were calculated with paired t test, with error bars showing S.E.

miR-17 Promotes TH17 Differentiation by Repressing Novel Target IKZF4

Previously, we identified that miR-17 protects CD4+ T cells from excessive activation induced cell death and inhibits iTreg differentiation by targeting the upstream signaling molecule TGFBRII and the transcription factor CREB1 (8). Although they are implicated in T cell differentiation (3133), we failed to detect any significant change in the expression of these two proteins in TH17-biased CD4+ T cells (supplemental Fig. S4). To identify the direct target(s) of miR-17 during TH17 differentiation, we conducted a qPCR array on 93 core mediators controlling various stages of TH17 differentiation. These genes were selected based on recent transcription factor network analysis of differentiated TH17 cells and dynamic regulatory network analysis of TH17 cells during the differentiation process (22, 23). Our list of core mediators (supplemental Table S1) includes validated TH17 regulators (RORγt, STAT3, BATF, etc.) as well as new and predicted key modulators (MINA, FOSL2, SP1, etc.). We collected RNA samples from WT and KO cells transduced with control, miR-17 or miR-19b vectors and performed 5 rounds of qPCR array (Fig. 5A, data as in supplemental Table S1). Among the significantly changed genes, we focused on genes that are up-regulated in miR-17-deficient KO CD4+ T cells, and, down-regulated when miR-17 was re-introduced (Fig. 5A). With these filtering criteria, we identified two genes, EBI3 and IKZF4, which fit this pattern and are also known to be negative regulators in TH17 differentiation. IKZF4 belongs to the Ikaros zinc finger transcription factor family and was recently shown to be a composite of the negative module in TH17 differentiation network (23). With computational algorisms, we failed to identify any conserved miR-17 binding sites in EBI3 mRNA; but, we predicted two potential miR-17 binding sites in the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of murine IKZF4 (Fig. 5B), with position 2394 being highly conserved among mammals. We cloned the IKZF4 3′-UTR containing these two miR-17 binding sites into a luciferase reporters and transfected the construct into 3T3 cells stably transduced with control or miR-17 retrovirus. As expected, miR-17 significantly repressed the expression of IKZF4 3′-UTR conjugated reporter (Fig. 5C). Importantly, during TH17 differentiation, protein levels of IKZF4 was also increased in the KO cells but reduced when miR-17 was reintroduced (Fig. 5D). Therefore, we concluded that IKZF4 is a direct target of miR-17.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

miR-17 promotes TH17 differentiation by repressing novel target IKZF4. A, volcano graph of qPCR array of 93 key TH17 regulators normalized to 3 endogenous controls. x axis indicates log2 value of relative fold changes, and y axis indicates log10 p value. y interception equals p = 0.05. Left panel compares KO-MOCK and WT-MOCK group (n = 5), and right panel compares KO-miR-17 and KO-MOCK group (n = 5). B, schematics of the two predicted miR-17 binding sites in the 3′UTR of IKZF4. C, luciferase assay of IKZF4 3′-UTR constructed into the firefly luciferase reporter normalized to Renilla luciferase control. The construct was transfected into 3T3 cells overexpressing MOCK or miR-17 (n = 5). D, Western blot of IKZF4 and β-actin in WT-MOCK, KO-MOCK, and KO-miR-17 cells cultured in TH17 conditions. E, WT CD4+ T cells were purified and infected with MOCK, miR-17 and miR-17-IKZF4 retrovirus and cultured in TH17 conditions for 5 days (n = 3). IL-17A, IFNγ, and IKZF4 expression was measured by intracellular staining and flow cytometry. Statistics were calculated by paired t test for A and unpaired t test for D and E.

To further validate whether miR-17- mediated IKZF4 suppression directly promotes TH17 differentiation, we constructed a rescue vector with concomitant expression of miR-17 and the IKZF4 coding sequence concordantly. We found that while miR-17 increases TH17 differentiation in WT cells, this increase is significantly tuned down when exogenous IKZF4, which can bypass miR-17 targeting, was introduced (Fig. 5E). Therefore, we concluded that transcription suppressor IKZF4 is a novel target of miR-17, and this targeting is crucial for miR-17's effect in promoting TH17 differentiation.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we demonstrated miR-17-92 cluster as a novel regulator of TH17 differentiation and its effector pathogenicity. In combination with our previous data that miR-17-92 facilitates cell proliferation, inhibits apoptosis, promotes TH1 differentiation, and impairs iTreg differentiation, our findings accentuate the notion that this cluster comprehensively controls inflammation elicited by antigen-specific CD4+ T cell activation. Evolutionarily, miR-17-92 is highly conserved in mammals (34), and by promoting CD4+ T cell mediated immunity, this cluster may confer survival benefits against non-self intrusions. However, overactivation of T cells also leads to severe consequences such as autoimmune diseases (35, 36). Our animal models indicate this miRNA cluster may be involved in the pathogenesis of MS in humans. By dissecting the individual miRNAs in the context of TH17 differentiation, we revealed different behaviors of the miRNAs in the cluster, with miR-17 and miR-19b exerting the most potential in driving TH17 differentiation and may contribute mostly to the onset of MS. This finding also suggests that MS therapies can be designed by targeting miRNAs. The safety and efficacy of oligonucleotide therapy against miRNAs have not only been tested in primates, but have also passed phase 2 human trials (36). Since miR-19b was also found to promote TH1-mediated inflammation (8), and oligonucleotides against miR-19b may not only benefit MS patients, but also a wide array of inflammatory diseases.

The finding that miR-19b affects PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis in TH17 differentiation is well consistent with our previous report, in which miR-19b represses PTEN to facilitate CD4+ T cell's anti-tumor response (8). Indeed, PI3K-AKT-mTOR is a central regulatory axis in TH17 differentiation: the activation of this pathway phosphorylates STAT3 and enhances the transcription of RORγt, the master transcription factor for TH17 lineage (37); moreover, PI3K-AKT-mTOR was found to facilitate RORγt nuclear translocation, while suppressing the TH17-negative regulator GFI1 (38). Additionally, PI3K-AKT-mTOR activation is also indispensable for efficient TH1 differentiation (37). As an antagonist of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis, PTEN acts as an important anti-inflammatory mediator by reducing both TH1 and TH17 mediated pathogenesis. Therefore, by repressing PTEN in T cells, miR-19b is able to extensively drive immune activation and inflammation.

We previously demonstrated that miR-17 can inhibit iTreg differentiation by targeting TGFBRII (8), and the dominant negative form of TGFBRII was found to impede TH17 differentiation (31). In view of this, there is a seemingly inverse correlation between miR-17 expression and the TH17 pathway. However, in our study, we did not detect changes of TGFBRII when miR-17 is overexpressed in TH17 cells (supplemental Fig. S4). This is probably due to differences in miR-17 targeting between the TH17 and iTreg contexts.

Instead, we identified IKZF4 as a target of miR-17 in controlling TH17 differentiation. IKZF4 is a member of the Ikaros family transcription factors. The Ikaros family was originally designated to function in hematopoiesis (39), but it is only until recently that studies begin to show the relevance of this family in T helper cell differentiation. IKZF3 was preferentially expressed in TH17 cells and governs TH17 differentiation by silencing IL-2 expression (40). By investigating the dynamics of the TH17 regulatory network, IKZF4 was proposed by Yosef et al. as a composite in the negative regulatory module for TH17. However, the function of this protein remained elusive. In our report, we provide the first evidence that miR-17 reinforces TH17 differentiation by repressing IKZF4.

TH17 and iTreg differentiation processes are mutually antagonistic; however, the plasticities of both lineages remain preserved in differentiated cells (41, 42). Although cytokine signaling plays vital roles in directing the TH17 and iTreg differentiation paradigms (43), a more fundamental diversion should occur at the epigenetic level. Pan et al. demonstrated that IKZF4 has the potential to function at the epigenetic level. By recruiting CtBP1 to epigenetically silence IL-2 and IFNγ, IKZF4 reinforces the suppressive functionality of thymic-derived nTregs (44). In addition, Munn et al. demonstrated that IKZF4 is critical for maintaining the lineage specificity of nTregs (45). We speculate that a similar mechanism could be at play during iTreg differentiation, and, IKZF4 may function as an intrinsic modulator in T cells that decides between the TH17 and iTreg lineage choices. This lineage choice is also impacted by miR-17: miR-17 biases T cells toward the TH17 lineage, while inhibiting iTreg differentiation (8). Therefore, we propose that by modulating IKZF4 expression, miR-17 is a post-transcriptional mechanism controlling TH17/iTreg plasticity.

Our molecular dissection indicated that miR-17 and miR-19b are united in many ways to promote the effector function of CD4+ T cells: protecting cells from activation-induced death, inhibiting iTreg differentiation, and, supporting TH17 differentiation. It is tempting to speculate that signaling pathways modulated by miR-17 and miR-19b may cross-talk with each other. Intriguingly, it has been shown that, in pro-B cells, the activation of PI3K is essential in controlling IKZF1 expression and therefore successful VDJ recombination (46). However, under both TH1 and TH17 conditions, manipulation of miR-17 did not cause any measurable impact on PTEN expression (Fig. 4); manipulation of miR-19b could not alter CREB1, TGFBRII (8), or IKZF4 expression (supplemental Fig. S5). Therefore, we concluded that miR-17 and miR-19b most likely modulate two independent signaling networks and their effects on CD4+ T cells are additive.

Recently, other groups reported that miR-17-92 promotes TFH differentiation by repressing genes involved in TH17 differentiation (9). However, it should be noted that, in this study, the experimental setup does not recapitulate the physiological conditions required for optimal TH17 induction: LCMV-specific CD4+ T cells carrying miR-17-92 deficiency were transferred into recipient mice followed by LCMV inoculation. In fact, LCMV infection elicits robust TH1, rather than TH17 responses. Under these circumstances, the TFH population generated might possess characteristics of TH1 cells (47), which could fundamentally differ from the bona fide TH17 cells generated in the EAE model. Given the context-dependent nature of miRNA targeting, they do not necessarily contradict miR-17-92's positive effect in TH17 differentiation in the EAE and colitis settings. Interestingly, RORA was reported to be a target of miR-17-92 in their particular system, and we also detected an increase in RORA at the transcription level in miR-17-92-deficient cells by our qPCR array (Fig. 5A). However, in miR-17-92-deficient CD4+ TH17 cells, this increase in RORA was overpowered by the elevation of PTEN and IKZF4 and their consequent suppressive effects. Therefore, we concluded that the overall role of miR-17-92 supports the TH17 differentiation program. Moreover, since it has been shown that TFH cells are highly plastic, and certain Peyer's patch TFH cells may even require preliminary TH17 differentiation (48, 49), it may be inappropriate to consider TFH and TH17 as strictly antagonistic lineages.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

We thank Makoto Inoue for kind help in conducting the EAE experiment. We thank Regina Lin for reviewing and revising the manuscript, and Erik Lykken for work in miRNA target identification.

*

This work was supported in part by Grants RAI091878A and RAI091878B from the NIAID, National Institutes of Health.

2
The abbreviations used are:
miRNA
microRNA
RORγt
retinoid-related orphan receptor-γ
STAT3
signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
FOXP3
Forkhead box P3
GFI1
growth factor-independent 1 transcription repressor
TGFBRII
transforming growth factor, β-receptor II
CREB1
cAMP responsive element-binding protein 1.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Fabian M. R., Sonenberg N., Filipowicz W. (2010) Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 351–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Soifer H. S., Rossi J. J., Saetrom P. (2007) MicroRNAs in disease and potential therapeutic applications. Mol. Ther. 15, 2070–2079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Li Q. J., Chau J., Ebert P. J. R., Sylvester G., Min H., Liu G., Braich R., Manoharan M., Soutschek J., Skare P., Klein L. O., Davis M. M., Chen C. Z. (2007) miR-181a is an intrinsic modulator of T cell sensitivity and selection. Cell 129, 147–161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rodriguez A., Vigorito E., Clare S., Warren M. V., Couttet P., Soond D. R., van Dongen S., Grocock R. J., Das P. P., Miska E. A., Vetrie D., Okkenhaug K., Enright A. J., Dougan G., Turner M., Bradley A. (2007) Requirement of bic/microRNA-155 for normal immune function. Science 316, 608–611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Stittrich A. B., Haftmann C., Sgouroudis E., Kühl A. A., Hegazy A. N., Panse I., Riedel R., Flossdorf M., Dong J., Fuhrmann F., Heinz G. A., Fang Z., Li N., Bissels U., Hatam F., Jahn A., Hammoud B., Matz M., Schulze F. M., Baumgrass R., Bosio A., Mollenkopf H. J., Grün J., Thiel A., Chen W., Höfer T., Loddenkemper C., Löhning M., Chang H. D., Rajewsky N., Radbruch A., Mashreghi M. F. (2010) The microRNA miR-182 is induced by IL-2 and promotes clonal expansion of activated helper T lymphocytes. Nat. Immunol. 11, 1057–1062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhu J. F., Yamane H., Paul W. E. (2010) Differentiation of Effector CD4 T Cell Populations. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 445–489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. He L., Thomson J. M., Hemann M. T., Hernando-Monge E., Mu D., Goodson S., Powers S., Cordon-Cardo C., Lowe S. W., Hannon G. J., Hammond S. M. (2005) A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature 435, 828–833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Jiang S., Li C., Olive V., Lykken E., Feng F., Sevilla J., Wan Y., He L., Li Q. J. (2011) Molecular dissection of the miR-17-92 cluster's critical dual roles in promoting Th1 responses and preventing inducible Treg differentiation. Blood 118, 5487–5497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Baumjohann D., Kageyama R., Clingan J. M., Morar M. M., Patel S., de Kouchkovsky D., Bannard O., Bluestone J. A., Matloubian M., Ansel K. M., Jeker L. T. (2013) The microRNA cluster miR-17 similar to 92 promotes T-FH cell differentiation and represses subset-inappropriate gene expression. Nat. Immunol. 14, 840- [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kang S. G., Liu W. H., Lu P., Jin H. Y., Lim H. W., Shepherd J., Fremgen D., Verdin E., Oldstone M. B., Qi H., Teijaro J. R., Xiao C. (2013) MicroRNAs of the miR-17 approximately 92 family are critical regulators of T(FH) differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 14, 849–857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. de Kouchkovsky D., Esensten J. H., Rosenthal W. L., Morar M. M., Bluestone J. A., Jeker L. T. (2013) microRNA-17-92 regulates IL-10 production by regulatory T cells and control of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 191, 1594–1605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lindberg R. L., Hoffmann F., Mehling M., Kuhle J., Kappos L. (2010) Altered expression of miR-17-5p in CD4+ lymphocytes of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Eur. J. Immunol. 40, 888–898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Korn T., Bettelli E., Oukka M., Kuchroo V. K. (2009) IL-17 and Th17 Cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 485–517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sato K., Suematsu A., Okamoto K., Yamaguchi A., Morishita Y., Kadono Y., Tanaka S., Kodama T., Akira S., Iwakura Y., Cua D. J., Takayanagi H. (2006) Th17 functions as an osteoclastogenic helper T cell subset that links T cell activation and bone destruction. J. Exp. Med. 203, 2673–2682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yen D., Cheung J., Scheerens H., Poulet F., McClanahan T., McKenzie B., Kleinschek M. A., Owyang A., Mattson J., Blumenschein W., Murphy E., Sathe M., Cua D. J., Kastelein R. A., Rennick D. (2006) IL-23 is essential for T cell-mediated colitis and promotes inflammation via IL-17 and IL-6. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 1310–1316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Chung Y., Yang X., Chang S. H., Ma L., Tian Q., Dong C. (2006) Expression and regulation of IL-22 in the IL-17-producing CD4+ T lymphocytes. Cell Res. 16, 902–907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Codarri L., Gyülveszi G., Tosevski V., Hesske L., Fontana A., Magnenat L., Suter T., Becher B. (2011) RORgammat drives production of the cytokine GM-CSF in helper T cells, which is essential for the effector phase of autoimmune neuroinflammation. Nat. Immunol. 12, 560–567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ye P., Rodriguez F. H., Kanaly S., Stocking K. L., Schurr J., Schwarzenberger P., Oliver P., Huang W., Zhang P., Zhang J., Shellito J. E., Bagby G. J., Nelson S., Charrier K., Peschon J. J., Kolls J. K. (2001) Requirement of interleukin 17 receptor signaling for lung CXC chemokine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor expression, neutrophil recruitment, and host defense. J. Exp. Med. 194, 519–527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kang Z., Wang C., Zepp J., Wu L., Sun K., Zhao J., Chandrasekharan U., DiCorleto P. E., Trapp B. D., Ransohoff R. M., Li X. (2013) Act1 mediates IL-17-induced EAE pathogenesis selectively in NG2(+) glial cells. Nature Neuroscience 16, 1401–1408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ivanov II, McKenzie B. S., Zhou L., Tadokoro C. E., Lepelley A., Lafaille J. J., Cua D. J., Littman D. R. (2006) The orphan nuclear receptor RORgammat directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells. Cell 126, 1121–1133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Yang X. O., Pappu B. P., Nurieva R., Akimzhanov A., Kang H. S., Chung Y., Ma L., Shah B., Panopoulos A. D., Schluns K. S., Watowich S. S., Tian Q., Jetten A. M., Dong C. (2008) T helper 17 lineage differentiation is programmed by orphan nuclear receptors RORα and RORγ. Immunity 28, 29–39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ciofani M., Madar A., Galan C., Sellars M., Mace K., Pauli F., Agarwal A., Huang W., Parkurst C. N., Muratet M., Newberry K. M., Meadows S., Greenfield A., Yang Y., Jain P., Kirigin F. K., Birchmeier C., Wagner E. F., Murphy K. M., Myers R. M., Bonneau R., Littman D. R. (2012) A validated regulatory network for Th17 cell specification. Cell 151, 289–303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Yosef N., Shalek A. K., Gaublomme J. T., Jin H., Lee Y., Awasthi A., Wu C., Karwacz K., Xiao S., Jorgolli M., Gennert D., Satija R., Shakya A., Lu D. Y., Trombetta J. J., Pillai M. R., Ratcliffe P. J., Coleman M. L., Bix M., Tantin D., Park H., Kuchroo V. K., Regev A. (2013) Dynamic regulatory network controlling TH17 cell differentiation. Nature 496, 461–468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ventura A., Young A. G., Winslow M. M., Lintault L., Meissner A., Erkeland S. J., Newman J., Bronson R. T., Crowley D., Stone J. R., Jaenisch R., Sharp P. A., Jacks T. (2008) Targeted deletion reveals essential and overlapping functions of the miR-17 similar to 92 family of miRNA clusters. Cell 132, 875–886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hue S., Ahern P., Buonocore S., Kullberg M. C., Cua D. J., McKenzie B. S., Powrie F., Maloy K. J. (2006) Interleukin-23 drives innate and T cell-mediated intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 203, 2473–2483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Olive V., Bennett M. J., Walker J. C., Ma C., Jiang I., Cordon-Cardo C., Li Q. J., Lowe S. W., Hannon G. J., He L. (2009) miR-19 is a key oncogenic component of mir-17-92. Gene Dev. 23, 2839–2849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Carracedo A., Pandolfi P. P. (2008) The PTEN-PI3K pathway: of feedbacks and cross-talks. Oncogene 27, 5527–5541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nagai S., Kurebayashi Y., Koyasu S. (2013) Role of PI3K/Akt and mTOR complexes in Th17 cell differentiation. Ann. NY Acad Sci. 1280, 30–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bellacosa A., Chan T. O., Ahmed N. N., Datta K., Malstrom S., Stokoe D., McCormick F., Feng J. N., Tsichlis P. (1998) Akt activation by growth factors is a multiple-step process: the role of the PH domain. Oncogene 17, 313–325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Knight Z. A., Gonzalez B., Feldman M. E., Zunder E. R., Goldenberg D. D., Williams O., Loewith R., Stokoe D., Balla A., Toth B., Balla T., Weiss W. A., Williams R. L., Shokat K. M. (2006) A pharmacological map of the PI3-K family defines a role for p110alpha in insulin signaling. Cell 125, 733–747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Qin H., Wang L., Feng T., Elson C. O., Niyongere S. A., Lee S. J., Reynolds S. L., Weaver C. T., Roarty K., Serra R., Benveniste E. N., Cong Y. (2009) TGF-β promotes Th17 cell development through inhibition of SOCS3. J. Immunol. 183, 97–105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Li M. O., Sanjabi S., Flavell R. A. (2006) Transforming growth factor-β controls development, homeostasis, and tolerance of T cells by regulatory T cell-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Immunity 25, 455–471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wen A. Y., Sakamoto K. M., Miller L. S. (2010) The Role of the Transcription Factor CREB in Immune Function. J. Immunol. 185, 6413–6419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lykken E. A., Li Q. J. (2011) microRNAs at the regulatory frontier: an investigation into how microRNAs impact the development and effector functions of CD4 T cells. Immunol. Res. 49, 87–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Rottiers V., Obad S., Petri A., McGarrah R., Lindholm M. W., Black J. C., Sinha S., Goody R. J., Lawrence M. S., deLemos A. S., Hansen H. F., Whittaker S., Henry S., Brookes R., Najafi-Shoushtari S. H., Chung R. T., Whetstine J. R., Gerszten R. E., Kauppinen S., Näär A. M. (2013) Pharmacological Inhibition of a MicroRNA Family in Nonhuman Primates by a Seed-Targeting 8-Mer AntimiR. Science Translational Medicine 5, 212ra162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Janssen H. L., Reesink H. W., Lawitz E. J., Zeuzem S., Rodriguez-Torres M., Patel K., van der Meer A. J., Patick A. K., Chen A., Zhou Y., Persson R., King B. D., Kauppinen S., Levin A. A., Hodges M. R. (2013) Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA. NE J Med. 368, 1685–1694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Delgoffe G. M., Pollizzi K. N., Waickman A. T., Heikamp E., Meyers D. J., Horton M. R., Xiao B., Worley P. F., Powell J. D. (2011) The kinase mTOR regulates the differentiation of helper T cells through the selective activation of signaling by mTORC1 and mTORC2. Nature Immunology 12, 295–303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kurebayashi Y., Nagai S., Ikejiri A., Ohtani M., Ichiyama K., Baba Y., Yamada T., Egami S., Hoshii T., Hirao A., Matsuda S., Koyasu S. (2012) PI3K-Akt-mTORC1-S6K1/2 Axis Controls Th17 Differentiation by Regulating Gfi1 Expression and Nuclear Translocation of RORγ. Cell Reports 1, 360–373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. John L. B., Ward A. C. (2011) The Ikaros gene family: transcriptional regulators of hematopoiesis and immunity. Mol. Immunol. 48, 1272–1278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Quintana F. J., Jin H., Burns E. J., Nadeau M., Yeste A., Kumar D., Rangachari M., Zhu C., Xiao S., Seavitt J., Georgopoulos K., Kuchroo V. K. (2012) Aiolos promotes TH17 differentiation by directly silencing Il2 expression. Nat. Immunol. 13, 770–777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Hoechst B., Gamrekelashvili J., Manns M. P., Greten T. F., Korangy F. (2011) Plasticity of human Th17 cells and iTregs is orchestrated by different subsets of myeloid cells. Blood 117, 6532–6541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Gomez-Rodriguez J., Wohlfert E. A., Handon R., Meylan F., Wu J. Z., Anderson S. M., Kirby M. R., Belkaid Y., Schwartzberg P. L. (2014) Itk-mediated integration of T cell receptor and cytokine signaling regulates the balance between Th17 and regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 211, 529–543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Eisenstein E. M., Williams C. B. (2009) The T(reg)/Th17 cell balance: a new paradigm for autoimmunity. Pediatric Res. 65, 26R–31R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Pan F., Yu H., Dang E. V., Barbi J., Pan X., Grosso J. F., Jinasena D., Sharma S. M., McCadden E. M., Getnet D., Drake C. G., Liu J. O., Ostrowski M. C., Pardoll D. M. (2009) Eos mediates Foxp3-dependent gene silencing in CD4+ regulatory T cells. Science 325, 1142–1146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sharma M. D., Huang L., Choi J. H., Lee E. J., Wilson J. M., Lemos H., Pan F., Blazar B. R., Pardoll D. M., Mellor A. L., Shi H., Munn D. H. (2013) An inherently bifunctional subset of Foxp3+ T helper cells is controlled by the transcription factor eos. Immunity 38, 998–1012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Alkhatib A., Werner M., Hug E., Herzog S., Eschbach C., Faraidun H., Köhler F., Wossning T., Jumaa H. (2012) FoxO1 induces Ikaros splicing to promote immunoglobulin gene recombination. J. Exp. Med. 209, 395–406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Liu X., Yan X., Zhong B., Nurieva R. I., Wang A., Wang X., Martin-Orozco N., Wang Y., Chang S. H., Esplugues E., Flavell R. A., Tian Q., Dong C. (2012) Bcl6 expression specifies the T follicular helper cell program in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 209, 1841–1852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hirota K., Turner J. E., Villa M., Duarte J. H., Demengeot J., Steinmetz O. M., Stockinger B. (2013) Plasticity of Th17 cells in Peyer's patches is responsible for the induction of T cell-dependent IgA responses. Nat. Immunol. 14, 372–379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Crotty S. (2011) Follicular Helper CD4 T Cells (T-FH). Annu. Rev. Immunol. 29, 621–663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES