Skip to main content
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports logoLink to International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
. 2014 Feb 24;5(5):215–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.01.023

Buschke–Lowenstein tumour of glans penis

Sunil Agarwal 1,, Gaurav Kumar Nirwal 1, Harendra Singh 1
PMCID: PMC4008846  PMID: 24705187

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Buschke–Löwenstein tumour, also known as Giant condyloma acuminatum, is a rare, sexually transmitted disease that affects ano-genital region. BLT is a slow growing cauliflower-like tumour, locally aggressive and destructive. Human papillomavirus has been identified as an important contributory factor in the development of tumour.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 45 year uncircumcised male presented with complaints of cauliflower like growth on glans penis. Growth started as a small papule on the corona sulcus at 12 O’clock position 6 months back. Patient developed pain and dysuria due to compression of urethral meatus. Patient has history of multiple sexual partners.

DISCUSSION

BLT, first described by Buschke and Lowenstein in 1925. They observed a penile lesion that clinically resembled both common condyloma acuminata and squamous cell carcinoma, but differing from both of them regarding the biological behaviour and the histopathological appearance. GCA can be differentiated from ordinary condylomas by the characteristic “pushing” rather than “infiltrating” effect that tends to compress and displace the underlying tissue.

CONCLUSION

We have successfully treated a penile BLT with surgical excision and no relapse up to 6 months. Surgical excision could be considered an effective therapy in the treatment.

Keywords: Giant condyloma acuminatum, Buschke–Löwenstein tumour, Surgical excision

1. Introduction

Buschke-Löwenstein tumour (BLT), also known as Giant condyloma acuminatum, is a very rare, sexually transmitted disease that affects the ano-genital region.1–3 BLT is a slow growing cauliflower-like tumour, but unlike simple condyloma, it is locally aggressive and destructive.4 It was originally described in 1896 by Buschke and Loewenstein in 1925 and later on was named by Loewenstein “carcinoma-like condylomata acuminata” of the penis.6 Although this is a well differentiated, benign lesion, its management is often challenging due to the size, rapidly growing, fungating variant, degree of local invasion, and recurrence rate. There is also elevated risk of malignant transformation towards squamous cellcarcinoma.7 Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been identified as an important contributory factor in the development of tumour. DNA corresponding to 6 and 11 HPV subtypes has been frequently identified in typical cauliflower-like lesions, suggesting the pathogenic role of the virus in the initiation and progression of the tumour.8,9 A proper biopsy must be wide and deep enough to accurately determine the extension of infiltration of the tumour and the possible presence of a squamous cell carcinoma. The article describes a case of Buschke–Loewenstein tumour, an analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis, as well as the chosen treatment approach.

2. Case report

A 45 year old uncircumcised male patient presented to NIMS Hospital, Jaipur with complaints of cauliflower like growth on glans penis. The growth started as a small papule on the corona sulcus at 12 O’clock position 6 months back, which gradually increased in size and extent. It involved upper 2/3rd of the glans resulting in early distortion of glance including urethral meatus. Patient also developed pain and dysuria due to compression of urethral meatus. Patient gives the history of multiple sexual partners.

Although lymphadenopathy was not apparent but a probable diagnosis of carcinoma penis was suspected. Laboratory tests revealed normal liver and kidney functions test. Serology for Hepatitis B was reactive. Serologies for Hepatitis C, HIV and syphilis had nonreactive results (Figs. 1–6).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Showing the posterior view of glans penis.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Showing the anterior view of glans penis.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Showing eroded corona of glans penis.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Operative procedure (partial glansectomy and meatoplasty).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Post operative image of reconstructed glans penis with preputial flap and meatoplasty.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Showing the post operative reconstruction of glans penis.

Under General Anaesthesia Incisional Biopsy of the tumour was taken and send for Histopathological examination. Histopathological examination of the tumour revealed Giant Condyloma Accuminata/Buschke–Loewenstein tumour showing hyperkeratosis, papillomatosis and acanthosis of squamous epithelium. There was vacuolization of keratinocytes and koilocytosis. The tumour tissue shows infiltration by lymphocytes.

Patient was initially not willing for surgery, so was advised for Ointment Podophylum application but no significant results were obtained in 4 weeks. So, partial glansectomy and immediate reconstruction of glans penis with preputial flap and meatoplasty was done under General Anaesthesia. Electrocauterization was also done. Attempt was made to conserve glans.

2.1. Procedure

Conservative surgery of glans penis was done through a circumferencial subcoronal incision of about 5 mm from corona in order to retract the penile shaft skin. Provided margins measured at least 5 mm, a deep tumour shaped incision was made on the glans and the surrounding tissue was meticulously excised. Once the margins were free, glans reconstruction and meatoplasty was satisfactorily achieved by using the preputial and coronal pedical flap.

2.2. Follow up

Patient was followed for a period of 6 months. He was able to resume his sexual function after 3 months, with good penile errection. There was no relapse of the tumour up to 6 months.

3. Discussion

BLT was first described by Buschke and Lowenstein in 1925.10 They observed a penile lesion that clinically resembled both common condyloma acuminata (venereal warts) and squamous cell carcinoma, but differing from both of them regarding the biological behaviour and the histopathological appearance.32 They described it as ‘cauliflower-like growth usually localized to the glans penis’ and considered it to be a low-grade, well-differentiated carcinoma displaying a marked tendency to compress and displace deeper tissues.10

GCA can be differentiated from ordinary condylomas by the characteristic “pushing” rather than “infiltrating” effect that tends to compress and displace the underlying tissue.17

Features of Buschke–Loewenstein tumours are ulcerated, fungating masses, and the characteristic histological pattern is showing both endophytic and exophytic growth with undulating papillomatosis of densely keratinized, well-differentiated squamous epithelium.11 CT scans can be used to demonstrate the exact location and extent of BLTs.12

A high incidence of GCA has been reported in the homo and bisexual populations and recurrent aggressive GCA has been reported in HIV positive patients.21 It is well established that benign genital warts (condylomata) are caused by human papillomaviruses (HPV): HPV type 6 (HPV 6) or HPV 11 can be detected in over 90% of these lesions,18,19 and it has shown that in vitro infection of human cervical tissue explants with these HPV types elicited a histological picture typical for genital warts.20

Treatment of GCA can be classified into three types: topical therapy (e.g., using podophyllin, fluorouracil, or radiotherapy), tumour removal (e.g., by cryotherapy using liquid nitrogen, CO2 laser therapy, electrocautery, or surgical excision), and immunotherapy (e.g., using imiquimod).13–15 However, no gold standard currently exists for treating this rare disease, and the choice of treatment depends largely on the physician's experience and skills.16

Podophyllin, although a useful topical remedy for ordinary condyloma acuminata, has repeatedly proved valueless for treating Buschke–Lowenstein's tumour.26–30 Such lesions, instead, are often subjected to electrocoagulation or surgical excision. In this patient, the lesion responded satisfactory to surgical excision and electrocoagulation.

The majority of authors agree that surgery is the treatment of choice and is effective especially in the early stages of the disease.23 Wide local excision remains the mainstay of therapy, that can be followed, if it is necessary, by delayed split thickness skin grafts.1,22,24,25

Hatzichristou et al.31 presented a series of cases in which they performed curative glansectomies, sparing the remainder of the penis. This may be an appropriate alternative in cases where the tumour is definitely limited to the glans.

4. Conclusion

BLT is a very rare sexually transmitted disease characterized by giant slow growing condyloma acuminatum that is, unlike simple condyloma, locally aggressive and destructive. It is fairly easily diagnosed. Although there have been isolated reports of successful treatment with various more-conservative modalities. Here we had successfully treated a penile BLT with surgical excision and no relapse up to 6 months. So surgical excision could be considered an effective therapy in the treatment.

5. Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Funding

None.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval has been given by the Ethical Committee in the Department of General Surgery. Reference number is 395/13.

Author contributions

Dr Sunil Kumar Agarwal contributed in study concept, treatment and guidance for article writing. Dr Gaurav Kumar Nirrwal contributed in study design, data collection, data analysis. Dr Harendra Singh contributed in interpretation and writing the paper.

Footnotes

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  • 1.Balik E., Eren T., Bugra D. A surgical approach to anogenital Buschke Loewenstein tumours (giant condyloma acuminata) Acta Chir Belg. 2009;109(5):612–616. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2009.11680497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Erkek E., Basar H., Bozdogan O., Emeksiz M.C. Giant condyloma acuminata of Buschke–Löwenstein: successful treatment with a combination of surgical excision, oral acitretin and topical imiquimod. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34(3):366–368. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.02938.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Miranda Aranzubía O., García Rodríguez J., González Alvarez R.C., Alvarez Mújica M., Rodríguez Robles L., Regadera Sejas J. Giant condyloma acuminatum (Buschke–Löwenstein tumor) Actas Urol Esp. 2008;32(9):951. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(08)73968-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Talwar A., Puri N., Singh M. Giant condyloma acuminatum of Buschke and Lowenstein: successful surgical treatment. Int J STD AIDS. 2010;21(6):446–448. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Buschke A. Fischer; New York: 1986. Neisser's Sterokopischer Atlas. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chu Q.D., Vezeridis M.P., Libbey N.P., Wanebo H.J. Giant condylomaacuminatum (Buschke–Lowenstein tumor) of the anorectal and perianal regions. Analysis of 42 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(September (9)):950–957. doi: 10.1007/BF02052606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tripoli M., Cordova A., Maggì F., Moschella F. Giant condylomata (Buschke–Löwenstein tumours): our case load in surgical treatment andreview of the current therapies. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16(June (6)):747–751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Braga J.C., Nadal S.R., Stiepcich M., Framil V.M., Muller H. Buschke–Loewenstein tumor: identification of HPV type 6 and 11. An Bras Dermatol. 2012;87(January–February (1)):131–134. doi: 10.1590/s0365-05962012000100018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Loewenstein L.W. Carcinoma-like condylomata acuminate of the penis. Med Clin N Am. 1939;23:789–795. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Balazs M. Buschke–Loewenstein tumour: a histologic and ultrastructural study of six cases. Virchows Arch A. 1986;410:83–92. doi: 10.1007/BF00713509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Balthazar E.J., Streiter M., Megibow A.J. Anorectal giant condyloma acuminatum (Buschke–Loewenstein tumor): CT and radiographic manifestations. Radiology. 1984;150:651–653. doi: 10.1148/radiology.150.3.6695063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Paraskevas K.I., Kyriakos E., Poulios E.E., Stathopoulos V., Tzovaras A.A., Briana D.D. Surgical management of giant condyloma acuminatum (Buschkee–Löwenstein tumor) of the perianal region. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:638e44. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33125.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brown S.B. The role of light in the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer using methyl aminolevulinate. J Dermatolog Treat. 2003;14(Suppl. 3):11e4. doi: 10.1080/jdt.14.s3.11.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Giomi B., Pagnini F., Cappuccini A., Bianchi B., Tiradritti L., Zuccati G. Immunological activity of photodynamic therapy for genital warts. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:448e51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chu G.-Y., Chang T.C.-C., Chang C.-H. Buschkee–Löwenstein tumor (giant condyloma acuminatum) successfully treated by topical photodynamic therapy: a case report. Dermatol Sin. 2013;31:94e97. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chu Q.D., Vezeridis M.P., Libbey N.P., Wanebo H.J. Giant condyloma acuminatum (Buschke–Lowenstein tumor) of the anorectal and perianal regions. Analysis of 42 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:950–957. doi: 10.1007/BF02052606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gissmann L., de Villiers E.-M., zur Hausen H. Analysis of human genital warts (condylomata acuminata) andother genital tumors for human papillomavirus type 6 DNA. Int J Cancer. 1982;29:143–146. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910290205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gissmann L., Wolnik L., Ikenberg H., Koldovsky U., Schnurch H.G., zur Hausen H. Human papillomavirus types 6 and 11 DNA sequences in genital and laryngeal papillomas and in some cervical cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;80:560–563. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.2.560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kreider J.W., Howett M.K., Wolfe S.A., Bartlett G.L., Zaino R.J., Sedlacek T.V. Morphological transformation in vivo of human uterine cervix with papillomavirus from condylomata acuminata. Nature (London) 1985;317:639–641. doi: 10.1038/317639a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Weils M., Robertson S., Lewis P., Dixon M.F. Squamous carcinoma arising in a giant condyloma associated with human papillomavirus type 6 and 11. Histopathology. 1988;12:319–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1988.tb01946.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Klaristenfeld D., Israelit S., Beart R.W., Ault G., Kaiser A.M. Surgical excision of extensive anal condylomata not associated with risk of anal stenosis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(9):853–856. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0494-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.El Mejjad A., Dakir M., Tahiri M., Attar H., Cherkaoui A., Araki A. Giant condyloma acuminata -- Buschke Lowenstein tumor (report of 3 cases) Prog Urol. 2003;13(3):513–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cintron J.R. Buschke–Lowenstein tumor of the perianal and anorectal region. Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 1995;6:135–139. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Longacre T.A., Kong C.S., Welton M.L. Diagnostic problems in anal pathology. Adv Anat Pathol. 2008;15(5):263–278. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e318183234b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dawson D.F., Duckworth J.K., Bernhardt H., Young J.M. Giant condyloma and verrucous carcinoma of the genital area. Arch Pathol. 1965;79:225–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Knoblich R., Failing J.F. Giant condyloma acuminatum (Buschke–LoweAstein) tumor of the rectum. Am J Clin Pathol. 1967;48:389–395. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/48.4.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.MacCarron D.L., Carlton C.E. Giant condyloma of the penis. J Urol. 1970;104:730–733. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)61822-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Machacek G.F., Weakley D.R. Giant condylomata acuminata of Buschke and Lowenstein. Arch Dermatol. 1960;82:41–47. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1960.01580010047007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Netto N.R., Jr., Chade J., Camargo F.P. Giant condyloma or Buschke–Llwenstein tumor. Int Surg. 1976;61:105–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hatzichristou D.G., Apostolidis A., Tzortzis V., Hatzimouratidis K., Ioannides E., Yannakoyorgos K. Glansectomy: an alternative surgical treatment for Buschke–Lowenstein tumors of the penis. Urology. 2001;57:966–969. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)00942-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Steffen C. The men behind the eponym – Abraham Buschke and Ludwig Lowenstein: giant condyloma (Buschke–Loewenstein) Am J Dermatopathol. 2006;28(December (6)):526–536. doi: 10.1097/01.dad.0000211528.87928.a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Surgery Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES