Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2014 Apr 9;70(Pt 5):o532–o533. doi: 10.1107/S1600536814007545

N′-[(E)-1-(2-Fluoro­phen­yl)ethyl­idene]pyridine-4-carbohydrazide

P B Sreeja a, M Sithambaresan b,*, N Aiswarya c, M R Prathapachandra Kurup c
PMCID: PMC4011257  PMID: 24860344

Abstract

The title compound, C14H12FN3O, adopts an E conformation with respect to the azomethine bond. The pyridyl and fluoro­benzene rings make dihedral angles of 38.58 (6) and 41.61 (5)° respectively with the central C(=O)N2CC unit, resulting in a non-planar mol­ecule. The inter­molecular inter­actions comprise two classical N—H⋯O and N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds and four non-classical C—H⋯O and C—H⋯F hydrogen bonds. These inter­actions are augmented by a weak π–π inter­action between the benzene and pyridyl rings of neighbouring mol­ecules, with a centroid–centroid distance of 3.9226 (10) Å. This leads to a three-dimensional supra­molecular assembly in the crystal system. The F atom is disordered over two sites in a 0.559 (3): 0.441 (3) ratio, through a 180° rotation of the fluoro­benzene ring.

Related literature  

For biological properties of hydrazones, see: Kahwa et al. (1986); Santos et al. (2001); Rollas & Kucukguzel (2007). For the synthesis of related compounds, see: Mangalam & Kurup (2011). For related structures, see: Sreeja et al. (2013, 2014).graphic file with name e-70-0o532-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C14H12FN3O

  • M r = 257.27

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 8.2649 (6) Å

  • b = 19.2127 (14) Å

  • c = 8.0554 (5) Å

  • β = 99.244 (3)°

  • V = 1262.51 (15) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.10 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.35 × 0.30 × 0.25 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004) T min = 0.965, T max = 0.976

  • 9610 measured reflections

  • 3137 independent reflections

  • 2262 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.030

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.048

  • wR(F 2) = 0.152

  • S = 1.04

  • 3113 reflections

  • 179 parameters

  • 1 restraint

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.24 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT and XPREP (Bruker, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2010); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) Global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814007545/fj2669sup1.cif

e-70-0o532-sup1.cif (21.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814007545/fj2669Isup2.hkl

e-70-0o532-Isup2.hkl (152.8KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814007545/fj2669Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 995414

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2′⋯N1i 0.87 (1) 2.45 (1) 3.1420 (15) 137 (1)
N2—H2′⋯O1i 0.87 (1) 2.38 (1) 3.1777 (15) 154 (2)
C8—H8C⋯F1i 0.96 2.46 3.1603 (19) 129
C8—H8C⋯O1i 0.96 2.58 3.0680 (13) 112
C13—H13⋯F1ii 0.93 2.34 3.238 (2) 161
C14—H14⋯O1i 0.93 2.50 3.1849 (19) 131

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

PBS thanks the Center for Research, Christ University, for financial assistance. MRPK thanks the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, for a UGC–BSR one-time grant to faculty. The authors thank the Sophisticated Analytical Instruments Facility, Cochin University of Science & Technology, for collection of the diffraction data.

supplementary crystallographic information

1. Comment

The chemistry of Schiff bases has attracted a great deal of interest in recent years. These compounds play an important role in the development of various proteins and enzymes (Kahwa et al., 1986; Santos et al., 2001). A number of hydrazones derived from isoniazid were reported to be active antitubercular agents and were found to be less toxic than isoniazid (Rollas & Kucukguzel, 2007). In this paper we report the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound.

The molecule crystallizes in monoclinic space group P21/c. The compound adopts an E configuration with respect to the azomethine olefinic bond whilst the C8 and N2 atoms are in Z configuration with respect to the same bond with torsion angles of -177.77 (8) of and 2.13 (14)° respectively (Fig. 1). The ketonic O and the azomethine N are also cis to each other with a torsion angle of 1.4 (2)°. The molecule exists in the amido form with a C9=O1 bond length of 1.2208 (16) Å which is very close to the reported C=O bond length of a similar structure (Sreeja et al., 2013). The pyridyl ring and the fluorophenyl ring make a dihedral angle of 38.58 (6) and 41.61 (5)° with the C(=O)N2CC central unit making the molecule non-planar.

There exist two classical N–H···O and N–H···N hydrogen bonding interactions with D···A distances of 3.1777 (15) and 3.1419 (15) Å respectively (Table 1). In addition to this, there are four non-classical C–H···O and C–H···F H bonding interactions present with D···A distances of 3.1603 (19), 3.0680 (13), 3.238 (2) and 3.1849 (19) Å connecting various adjacent molecules together with the main molecule (Fig. 2). The hydrogen atoms at N2 and C8 form bifurcated hydrogen bonds with O1 & N1 and F1 and O1 respectively (Fig. 2). A weak π···π interaction between the phenyl and the pyridyl ring of the neighbouring molecules also supports to form a three-dimensional supramolecular assembly together with the dominant H bonding interactions with a centroid-centroid distance of 3.9226 (10) Å (Fig. 2). Fig. 3 shows the packing of the molecules by means of hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions along a axis.

Through a 180° rotation of the fluorophenyl ring, the fluorine atom F1 is disordered over two sites in a ratio of 56.0 (1):44.0 (1). Similar instances of positional disorder had been previously reported (Sreeja et al., 2014).

2. Experimental

The title compound was prepared by adapting a reported procedure (Mangalam & Kurup, 2011). Methanolic solutions of pyridine-4-carbohydrazide (0.137 g, 1 mmol) and 1-(2-fluorophenyl)ethanone (0.138 g, 1 mmol) was refluxed, in presence of a few drops of glacial acetic acid for 6 h. On cooling the reactant media, colourless crystals of hydrazones were separated out. The crystals were filtered and washed with minimum quantity of methanol and dried over P4O10in vacuo. Good quality block shaped crystals suitable for X-ray analysis, were obtained from methanolic solution by slow evaporation.

3. Refinement

The fluorine atoms F1 and F1B of this molecule were refined freely, with the sum of their occupancy factors constrained to 1.0. The H5 at C5 atom is placed in geometrically idealized position with occupancy factor equal to that F1, and its coordinates were fixed. The H1 atom was refined with restrained distance of 0.93 Å with occupancy factor equal to that of F1B. The N2—H2' distance was restrained to 0.88±0.01 Å. The H atoms on the rest of C atoms were placed in calculated positions, guided by difference maps, with C–H bond distances 0.93–0.96 Å. H atoms were assigned as Uiso(H)=1.2Ueq(carrier) or 1.5Ueq (methyl C).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

ORTEP diagram of N'-[(1E)-1-(2-fluorophenyl)ethylidene]pyridine-4-carbohydrazide with 50% probability ellipsoids. The minor components of fluorine and hydrogen atoms of the disorder are omitted.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Hydrogen-bonding and π···π interactions in the title compound. The minor components of fluorine and hydrogen atoms of the disorder are omitted.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Packing diagram of the title compound along a axis.

Crystal data

C14H12FN3O F(000) = 536
Mr = 257.27 Dx = 1.354 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 3938 reflections
a = 8.2649 (6) Å θ = 2.5–28.2°
b = 19.2127 (14) Å µ = 0.10 mm1
c = 8.0554 (5) Å T = 296 K
β = 99.244 (3)° Block, colorless
V = 1262.51 (15) Å3 0.35 × 0.30 × 0.25 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer 3137 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2262 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.030
Detector resolution: 8.33 pixels mm-1 θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.5°
ω and φ scan h = −10→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004) k = −25→25
Tmin = 0.965, Tmax = 0.976 l = −6→10
9610 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.152 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0851P)2 + 0.152P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3113 reflections Δρmax = 0.24 e Å3
179 parameters Δρmin = −0.21 e Å3
1 restraint Extinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.091 (9)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq Occ. (<1)
F1 1.2954 (2) 0.23496 (9) 0.7843 (2) 0.0687 (7) 0.559 (3)
F1B 1.1039 (4) 0.01885 (12) 0.6026 (3) 0.0868 (11) 0.441 (3)
O1 0.85862 (15) 0.33623 (6) 0.55332 (12) 0.0580 (3)
N1 1.02285 (13) 0.21790 (6) 0.53744 (12) 0.0407 (3)
N2 0.93699 (14) 0.24882 (6) 0.39513 (13) 0.0412 (3)
N3 0.5574 (2) 0.40011 (8) −0.01035 (19) 0.0675 (4)
C1 1.27207 (19) 0.16966 (8) 0.80753 (18) 0.0496 (4)
H1 1.2797 0.2175 0.7923 0.059* 0.441 (3)
C2 1.3481 (2) 0.14096 (11) 0.9566 (2) 0.0674 (5)
H2 1.4056 0.1691 1.0399 0.081*
C3 1.3382 (3) 0.07038 (11) 0.9809 (2) 0.0726 (5)
H3 1.3889 0.0505 1.0811 0.087*
C4 1.2544 (3) 0.02970 (10) 0.8585 (3) 0.0734 (5)
H4 1.2473 −0.0181 0.8746 0.088*
C5 1.17979 (10) 0.05957 (4) 0.71021 (9) 0.0592 (4)
H5 1.1236 0.0310 0.6271 0.071* 0.559 (3)
C6 1.18520 (10) 0.13048 (4) 0.68017 (9) 0.0411 (3)
C7 1.10140 (10) 0.16188 (4) 0.52091 (9) 0.0399 (3)
C8 1.11560 (10) 0.12603 (4) 0.35878 (9) 0.0566 (4)
H8A 1.0211 0.0972 0.3257 0.085*
H8B 1.2126 0.0977 0.3735 0.085*
H8C 1.1222 0.1602 0.2732 0.085*
C9 0.85653 (17) 0.30834 (7) 0.41681 (15) 0.0409 (3)
C10 0.75600 (16) 0.33873 (7) 0.26301 (16) 0.0390 (3)
C11 0.7454 (2) 0.40996 (8) 0.2466 (2) 0.0546 (4)
H11 0.8047 0.4389 0.3269 0.066*
C12 0.6454 (2) 0.43775 (9) 0.1093 (2) 0.0676 (5)
H12 0.6392 0.4860 0.1000 0.081*
C13 0.5681 (2) 0.33184 (9) 0.0080 (2) 0.0604 (4)
H13 0.5069 0.3043 −0.0741 0.073*
C14 0.66414 (18) 0.29849 (8) 0.14078 (18) 0.0476 (3)
H14 0.6667 0.2502 0.1475 0.057*
H2' 0.944 (2) 0.2338 (8) 0.2948 (14) 0.053 (4)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
F1 0.0844 (14) 0.0480 (10) 0.0645 (11) −0.0090 (8) −0.0157 (9) −0.0032 (8)
F1B 0.129 (3) 0.0477 (14) 0.0729 (16) −0.0225 (13) −0.0185 (15) 0.0026 (11)
O1 0.0791 (8) 0.0563 (7) 0.0350 (5) 0.0115 (5) −0.0015 (5) −0.0073 (4)
N1 0.0442 (6) 0.0490 (6) 0.0280 (5) 0.0044 (5) 0.0026 (4) 0.0053 (5)
N2 0.0477 (7) 0.0498 (7) 0.0248 (5) 0.0072 (5) 0.0021 (4) 0.0029 (4)
N3 0.0639 (9) 0.0691 (9) 0.0618 (8) 0.0087 (7) −0.0132 (7) 0.0126 (7)
C1 0.0514 (8) 0.0522 (8) 0.0421 (7) 0.0001 (6) −0.0015 (6) 0.0027 (6)
C2 0.0646 (11) 0.0874 (13) 0.0435 (8) −0.0005 (9) −0.0116 (7) 0.0025 (8)
C3 0.0748 (12) 0.0848 (13) 0.0540 (10) 0.0174 (10) −0.0023 (9) 0.0261 (9)
C4 0.0912 (14) 0.0584 (10) 0.0680 (11) 0.0085 (9) 0.0046 (10) 0.0226 (9)
C5 0.0708 (11) 0.0504 (9) 0.0540 (9) −0.0012 (8) 0.0025 (8) 0.0085 (7)
C6 0.0409 (7) 0.0462 (7) 0.0356 (6) 0.0027 (6) 0.0043 (5) 0.0051 (5)
C7 0.0413 (7) 0.0444 (7) 0.0328 (6) −0.0021 (5) 0.0021 (5) 0.0031 (5)
C8 0.0755 (11) 0.0520 (8) 0.0381 (7) 0.0112 (8) −0.0038 (7) −0.0036 (6)
C9 0.0458 (7) 0.0446 (7) 0.0307 (6) −0.0009 (5) 0.0017 (5) 0.0009 (5)
C10 0.0393 (7) 0.0440 (7) 0.0334 (6) 0.0040 (5) 0.0050 (5) 0.0009 (5)
C11 0.0611 (10) 0.0434 (8) 0.0539 (9) −0.0009 (6) −0.0071 (7) 0.0002 (6)
C12 0.0733 (12) 0.0476 (9) 0.0741 (11) 0.0041 (8) −0.0117 (9) 0.0125 (8)
C13 0.0566 (9) 0.0658 (10) 0.0514 (9) 0.0039 (8) −0.0139 (7) −0.0045 (8)
C14 0.0492 (8) 0.0455 (7) 0.0452 (7) 0.0031 (6) −0.0013 (6) −0.0030 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

F1—C1 1.288 (2) C3—C4 1.358 (3)
F1B—C5 1.258 (2) C4—C5 1.3782 (19)
O1—C9 1.2208 (16) C5—C6 1.3856
N1—C7 1.2748 (13) C6—C7 1.4846
N1—N2 1.3818 (15) C7—C8 1.4977
N2—C9 1.3483 (18) C9—C10 1.4951 (18)
N3—C13 1.321 (2) C10—C11 1.376 (2)
N3—C12 1.325 (2) C10—C14 1.380 (2)
C1—C6 1.3777 (16) C11—C12 1.378 (2)
C1—C2 1.378 (2) C13—C14 1.383 (2)
C2—C3 1.374 (3)
C7—N1—N2 118.60 (9) C5—C6—C7 121.8
C9—N2—N1 117.10 (10) N1—C7—C6 115.31 (5)
C13—N3—C12 116.19 (14) N1—C7—C8 126.29 (5)
F1—C1—C6 119.78 (13) C6—C7—C8 118.4
F1—C1—C2 117.28 (16) O1—C9—N2 123.57 (12)
C6—C1—C2 122.72 (15) O1—C9—C10 120.04 (12)
C3—C2—C1 119.32 (17) N2—C9—C10 116.35 (11)
C4—C3—C2 119.98 (16) C11—C10—C14 118.00 (13)
C3—C4—C5 119.64 (16) C11—C10—C9 119.08 (12)
F1B—C5—C4 116.26 (16) C14—C10—C9 122.78 (12)
F1B—C5—C6 121.17 (12) C10—C11—C12 118.87 (15)
C4—C5—C6 122.56 (10) N3—C12—C11 124.12 (16)
C1—C6—C5 115.77 (7) N3—C13—C14 124.51 (15)
C1—C6—C7 122.44 (7) C10—C14—C13 118.29 (14)
C7—N1—N2—C9 −179.39 (11) C5—C6—C7—N1 136.27 (7)
F1—C1—C2—C3 −174.5 (2) C1—C6—C7—C8 136.79 (9)
C6—C1—C2—C3 0.1 (3) C5—C6—C7—C8 −43.6
C1—C2—C3—C4 0.1 (3) N1—N2—C9—O1 1.4 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5 0.1 (3) N1—N2—C9—C10 −176.38 (11)
C3—C4—C5—F1B −179.8 (2) O1—C9—C10—C11 37.3 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C6 −0.6 (2) N2—C9—C10—C11 −144.86 (14)
F1—C1—C6—C5 173.92 (14) O1—C9—C10—C14 −138.39 (15)
C2—C1—C6—C5 −0.56 (18) N2—C9—C10—C14 39.45 (18)
F1—C1—C6—C7 −6.5 (2) C14—C10—C11—C12 −0.5 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C7 179.04 (12) C9—C10—C11—C12 −176.42 (15)
F1B—C5—C6—C1 180.0 (2) C13—N3—C12—C11 0.6 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C1 0.80 (13) C10—C11—C12—N3 −0.1 (3)
F1B—C5—C6—C7 0.39 (19) C12—N3—C13—C14 −0.4 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C7 −178.81 (11) C11—C10—C14—C13 0.7 (2)
N2—N1—C7—C6 −177.77 (8) C9—C10—C14—C13 176.42 (13)
N2—N1—C7—C8 2.13 (14) N3—C13—C14—C10 −0.2 (3)
C1—C6—C7—N1 −43.30 (10)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N2—H2′···N1i 0.87 (1) 2.45 (1) 3.1420 (15) 137 (1)
N2—H2′···O1i 0.87 (1) 2.38 (1) 3.1777 (15) 154 (2)
C8—H8C···F1i 0.96 2.46 3.1603 (19) 129
C8—H8C···O1i 0.96 2.58 3.0680 (13) 112
C13—H13···F1ii 0.93 2.34 3.238 (2) 161
C14—H14···O1i 0.93 2.50 3.1849 (19) 131

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (ii) x−1, y, z−1.

Footnotes

Supporting information for this paper is available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: FJ2669).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. (2010). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Bruker (2004). APEX2, SAINT, XPREP and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.
  4. Kahwa, I. A., Selbin, I., Hsieh, T. C. Y. & Laine, R. A. (1986). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 118, 179–185.
  5. Mangalam, N. A. & Kurup, M. R. P. (2011). Spectrochim. Acta Part A, 78, 926–934. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Rollas, S. & Kucukguzel, S. G. (2007). Molecules, 12, 1910–1939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Santos, M. L. P., Bagatin, I. A., Pereira, E. M. & Ferreira, A. M. D. C. (2001). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 838–844.
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Sreeja, P. B., Sithambaresan, M., Aiswarya, N. & Kurup, M. R. P. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o1828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Sreeja, P. B., Sithambaresan, M., Aiswarya, N. & Kurup, M. R. P. (2014). Acta Cryst. E70, o115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) Global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814007545/fj2669sup1.cif

e-70-0o532-sup1.cif (21.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814007545/fj2669Isup2.hkl

e-70-0o532-Isup2.hkl (152.8KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814007545/fj2669Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 995414

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES