Skip to main content
PMC home page
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal logoLink to Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
. 2014 Apr 28;5(2):e0009. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10143

Head and Neck Cancers in Developing Countries

Poonam Joshi 1, Sourav Dutta 1, Pankaj Chaturvedi 1,*, Sudhir Nair 1
Editor: Ziv Gil
PMCID: PMC4011474  PMID: 24808947

Abstract

Head and neck cancers are the most common cancers in developing countries, especially in Southeast Asia. Head and neck cancers are more common in males compared to females. This is mainly attributed to tobacco, areca nut, alcohol, etc. Oral cancers are most common amongst all head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC). HNSCC in the developing world differ from those in the Western world in terms of age, site of disease, etiology, and molecular biology. Poverty, illiteracy, advanced stage at presentation, lack of access to health care, and poor treatment infrastructure pose a major challenge in management of these cancers. The annual GDP (gross domestic product) spent on health care is very low in developing countries compared to the developed countries. Cancer treatment leads to a significant financial burden on the cancer patients and their families. Several health programs have been implemented to curb this rising burden of disease. The main aims of these health programs are to increase awareness among people regarding tobacco and to improve access to health care facilities, early diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care.

Keywords: Developing countries, head and neck cancers, health infrastructure, human papillomavirus, tobacco

INTRODUCTION

World-wide, the head and neck cancers form the sixth most common cancer.1 Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the most common cancer in developing countries.2 It is the most common cancer of males in India and the fifth most common in females.3 HNC form 21% of the cancers in males and 11% in females in Pakistan.4 In India, the age-adjusted rates among females is the highest.5

While head and neck cancers form one of the most common cancers in South and Southeast Asian countries, they form only 1%–4% of all cancers in the Western world.6 Oral cancers are predominant forms of head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) in India, Pakistan, and other Southeast Asian countries; oropharyngeal and tongue cancers are common in the Western world.4 These differences in site of disease may be related to the prevalent habits in the respective regions.5

RISK FACTORS

Cigarette-smoking and alcohol consumption are the main reasons for HNSCC in the Western population, whereas the use of smokeless tobacco and areca nut is the most common cause of HNSCC in SoutheastAsia.7,8 The various forms in which smokeless tobacco is used in developing countries include khaini, mava, paan (betel quid), zarda, snuff, mashiri, etc.9

Betel quid chewing is the most common form of tobacco chewing in the Asia-Pacific region. Betel quid consists of areca nut, betel leaf, catechu, and slaked lime.10 It has been reported from many countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, China, Philippines, Taiwan, Vietnam, and migrant populations in Europe, Africa, North America, and Australia.11 About 10% of the world’s population chew betel quid regularly.12 In one study conducted in Southeast Asia, the lower socio-economic groups had higher risk of developing HNC.13

Areca nut alone is a confirmed carcinogen and causally associated with a premalignant condition called oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) and oral cancer.14 It is a chronic, debilitating disease of the aerodigestive tract owing to irreversible fibroelastic changes in the lamina propria which lead to stiffness of the oral mucosa resulting in progressive trismus.15 This is uncommon in the Western world due to the rarity of areca nut use. In India alone, 5 million people (0.5% of the population of India) have OSMF. It is considered a public health issue in India, South Africa, and many Southeast Asian countries.16

Tobacco consumption in India is growing at a rate of 2%–3% per annum.17 Tobacco use is expected to cause 8.4 million deaths by 2020, and 70% of these will be in developing countries. In 2010, about 930,000 deaths were estimated to be attributable to tobacco in India.18 The high prevalence of tobacco usage has led to increases in disease burden and high health care costs in developing countries. There is a high incidence of smoking reported amongst youth from Bangladesh, India, and Indonesia.19 While the incidence of head and neck cancers is decreasing in Europe and North America, it remains unabated in the developing world.20

In India, nearly two-thirds of patients present with advanced stages.13,21 The mean age of patients at presentation of head and neck cancers is the fifth and early sixth decades in Asian populations compared with the seventh and eighth decades in the North American population.22–26

HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS (HPV) PREVALENCE

The overall prevalence of HPV in HNSCC is around 50%,27 with the highest prevalence in cancers of the tonsil and base of tongue.28 The rise in HPV-related cancers has been mainly attributed to the change in sexual practices in the Western world. These patients are younger, have bulky nodes, predominantly oropharynx involvement, equal gender distribution, and have better survival.29–31 HPV-16 is the most common type, being present in 30.9% of oropharyngeal carcinomas, 16% of oral cancers, and 16.6% of laryngeal cancers. Prevalence of HPV in oral cancers is similar in Europe (16%) and North America (16.1%), but greater in Asia (33%).32

The HPV prevalence in India ranges from 33.6% in the Eastern region to 67% in South India and 15% in Western India.33,34 The prevalences of HPV-6, HPV-11, HPV-16, and HPV-18 were 13%, 20%, 42%, and 47%, respectively.33 HPV-16 was most common, followed by HPV-18 and then cross-infection (16 and 18); 41% of patients had multiple HPV infections.33 Lesions of the tongue had the highest rate (9 of 11) of HPV infection. Another study showed a rate of HPV infections of 56.3% in cancers of the mandible, 37.5% in cheek, and 38.6% in maxilla. The study also reported that the advanced stages (III, IV) had higher infection rates as compared to earlier stage.35

The vaccination of HPV has not been incorporated in the national immunization program of India. There is no evidence to show that HPV vaccination may prevent HNSCC.

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF HEAD AND NECK CANCERS

Between developed and developing countries, there are not only differences in the age, subsite, and habit but also in the molecular biology. The prevalence of the p53 mutation is common in Europe and USA but rare in India. The recent data show the prevalence to be 81% in the Western world. Multiple genetic abnormalities are common in head and cancers in India and Southeast Asia. These include a preponderance of Ha-ras mutations (35%), loss of heterozygosity of Ha-ras (30%), N-ras amplification (28%), and N-myc amplification (29%). These mutations in ras oncogenes are uncommon in the Western world.36

HIGH INCIDENCE RATES IN INDIA

The leading cause of death in males is cancers of the oral cavity, lungs, esophagus, and stomach. In females, the most common site is uterine cervix, breast, and oral cavity. The Cancer Atlas project by the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) has shown the incidences of various cancers in different parts of India.37 Aizawl district in the northeastern state of Mizoram has the world’s highest incidence of cancers, in men, of the lower pharynx (11.5 per 100,000 people) and the tongue (7.6 per 100,000 people). Pondicherry has one of the highest incidences of mouth cancer in the world among males (8.9 per 100,000), and Kohima, the capital city of another northeastern state, Nagaland, has the world’s highest incidence of nasopharyngeal cancers.38,39

CHALLENGES IN HEALTH CARE

The number of health care institutes dedicated to cancer care is woefully inadequate when compared with Western countries. There are 27 dedicated cancer hospitals (regional cancer centers), and there are about 300 more general or multispecialty hospitals which give cancer care to the patients.40 In the year 2010, India spent only 3.7% of its gross domestic product (GDP) on its health sector, which was even lower than the percentage of GDP spent by the other small South Asian countries like Afghanistan (10.4%), Nepal (5.1%), Bhutan (4.3%), or the Maldives (6.2%).40,41 In the same year, about 71.8% of all healthcare expenditure in India was paid for privately(16.8% in the United Kingdom42), with state and central governments contributing 12% and 6.8%, respectively.43 This indicates that, with only 3.7% of GDP being spent on healthcare, the government’s contribution is <1% of GDP.41

The infrastructure for cancer management is largely inadequate in India. According to the annual report of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board of the Government of India, till March 2012, 319 institutions across the country had radiotherapy facilities. There were 484 teletherapy units and 343 brachytherapy units at that point of time. Among the teletherapy units, 237 were telecobalt units, and 232 were accelerators.44 In the year 2007, only 231 institutions had radiotherapy facilities, with 378 teletherapy units and 266 brachytherapy units.45 So it is obvious that there has been a significant improvement of radiotherapy facilities in the last 5 years, especially in the form of accelerator teletherapy units, of which there were 87 in the year 2007, increasing to 232 in 2012. However, for a population of about 1.2 billion, the requirement of radiotherapy machines is about 1,200, which clearly points out that the present resources are far from sufficient.

A study commissioned by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in 2008 showed that, by 2020, there will be 12,500 oncologists available in the USA, and the ratio of cancer patients to oncologists will be 100:1. It was also projected that even if the supply of oncologists were increased by 14%, the requirement for oncologists would increase by 48%.46 This discrepancy in oncologist and patient numbers in a developed country like the US reflects that the ratio is expected to be even worse in developing countries where infrastructure as well as medical facilities are scarce. In Zimbabwe, the nurse to patient ratio in provincial hospitals is 1:522, while in district hospitals the ratio may be as high as 1:3,023. Such ratios greatly affect the health care delivery in developing countries.47

India is classified as a lower-middle-income group country by the World Bank.48 Ninety percent of the oral cancer patients in rural areas belong to the lower or lower-middle socio-economic class, and 3.6% are below the poverty line based on Pareek’s classification.49 Around 75% to 80% of patients with cancers present with late-stage incurable disease and hence increased mortality.50 One reason for delayed diagnosis is the lack of easy access to healthcare, with one study demonstrating a delay of 67.5 days and 53.7 days in obtaining a first appointment for rural and urban patients, respectively. Other reasons included poor socio-economic status of the patient, cost of care, and high rate of illiteracy.51

Another cross-sectional study on head and neck cancers showed that various beliefs of patients (such as “it is ill-fated to have cancer”, “cancer is a curse”), non-availability of transport, ignoring the trivial ulcers in the mouth and believing them to be self-limiting, and prolonged treatment resulting in family stress are important factors in treatment delay.52 In addition to inadequate infrastructure, the unequal distribution of health care workers poses a major challenge. The number of health providers per 10,000 population can range from 23.2 in Chandigarh (capital of Punjab and Haryana in the north) to 2.5 in Meghalaya. The majority of the allopathic doctors are located in the south of the country.53 Within each geographic region, a greater concentration of trained physicians is seen in urban areas (60%) compared to rural areas. In particular, 74% of all graduate doctors live in urban areas and provide care to 28% of the nation’s population. Similarly, a disproportionate number of nurses and midwives (four times greater) are located in urban compared to rural areas.43

FUTURE OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM

The major challenge for the management of head and neck cancers is the lower socio-economic class of the majority of the population in developing countries. Along with this, scarcity of infrastructure and health care workers, illiteracy, lack of awareness among the general population about the side effects of tobacco, and prevalent cultural beliefs lead to delays in seeking treatment and, thus, advanced-stage presentation of disease.

In response to the increase in the number of cancer patients, new cancer control programs have been implemented in developing countries with the goals of achieving prevention, strengthening the available cancer treatment facilities, and early diagnosis and treatment.54

The government of India has initiated a national cancer control program to combat the increasing incidence of cancer in India. Oncology units have been developed in 82 institutes in both government medical colleges and government hospitals. There are 246 institutions with radiotherapy facilities across the country. The District Cancer Control Programme has been developed to initiate awareness and early detection activities at the district level. Health education has also been promoted under this program.39

The need for the future is to have sufficient numbers of trained oncologists and associated medical workers along with infrastructure and government commitment to tackle head and neck cancer as the major disease burden. Along with this, special emphasis needs to be given to prevention programs by the government, as head and neck cancers are potentially preventable.

Abbreviations:

GDP

gross domestic product

HNC

head and neck cancer

HNSCC

head and neck squamous cell cancers

HPV

human papilloma virus

OSMF

oral submucous fibrosis.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Parkin DM, Stjernsward J, Muir CS. Estimates of the worldwide frequency of twelve major cancers. Bull WHO. 1984;62:163–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO 2008 The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Available at: www.who.int/evidence/bod (accessed January 27, 2014)
  • 3.International Agency for Research on Cancer GLOBOCAN 2008. 2010. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx (accessed January 27, 2014)
  • 4.Bhurgri Y, Bhurgri A, Usman A, et al. Epidemiological review of head and neck cancers in Karachi. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7:195–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sankaranarayanan R, Masuyer E, Swaminathan R, Ferlay J, Whelan S. Head and neck cancer: a global perspective on epidemiology and prognosis. Anticancer Res. 1998;18:4779–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Silverman S. Oral Cancer. Hamilton, London: BC Decker; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Graham S. Dentition, diet, tobacco and alcohol in the epidemiology of oral cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1977;59:1611–18. doi: 10.1093/jnci/59.6.1611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dayal PK, Mani NJ, Bhargava K. Prevalence of oral cancer and precancerous lesions in ‘pan’/’supari’ chewers. Indian J Public Health. 1978;22:234–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mehta FS, Hamner JE. Tobacco Habits in India In: Tobacco-Related Oral Mucosal Lesions and Conditions in India. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers; 1993. pp. 89–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Warnakulasuriya S, Trivedy C, Peters TJ. Areca nut use: an independent risk factor for oral cancer. BMJ. 2002;324:799–800. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gupta PC, Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of areca nut usage. Addict Biol. 2002;7:77–83. doi: 10.1080/13556210020091437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gupta PC, Ray CS. Epidemiology of betel quid usage. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33:31–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Agarwal AK, Sethi A, Sareen D, Dhingra S. Treatment delay in oral and oropharyngeal cancer in our population: the role of socio-economic factors and health-seeking behaviour. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;63:145–50. doi: 10.1007/s12070-011-0134-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gupta PC, Sinor PN, Bhonsle RB, Pawar VS, Mehta HC. Oral sub-mucous fibrosis in India: a new epidemic? Natl Med J India. 1998;11:113–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Angadi PV, Rao SS. Areca nut in pathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis: revisited. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;15:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10006-010-0219-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rajalalitha P, Vali S. Molecular pathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis—a collagen metabolic disorder. J Oral Pathol Med. 2005;34:321–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2005.00325.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jandoo T, Mehrotra R. Tobacco control in India: present scenario and challenges ahead. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9:805–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Boston: Harvard University Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jha P, Chaloupka FJ. Curbing the Epidemic: Governments and Economics of Tobacco Control. Washington DC: World Bank; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boyle P, Levin B, editors. World Cancer Report. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Patel UA, Lynn-Macrae A, Rosen F, Holloway N, Kern R. Advanced stage of head and neck cancer at a tertiary-care county hospital. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1473–7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000227448.71894.8c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chhetri DK, Rawnsley JD, Calcaterra TC. Carcinoma of the buccal mucosa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:566–71. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.110539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Diaz EM, Holsinger FFC, Zuniga ER, Roberts DB, Sorensen DM. Squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: one institution’s experience with 119 previously untreated patients. Head Neck. 2003;25:267–73. doi: 10.1002/hed.10221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lin CS, Jen YM, Cheng MF, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: an aggressive cancer requiring multimodality treatment. Head Neck. 2006;28:150–7. doi: 10.1002/hed.20303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sieczka E, Datta R, Singh A, et al. Cancer of the buccal mucosa: are margins and T stage accurate predictors of local control? Am J Otolaryngol. 2001;22:395–9. doi: 10.1053/ajot.2001.28067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Strome SE, To W, Strawderman M, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;120:375–9. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70278-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cruz IB, Snijders PJ, Steenbergen RD, et al. Age-dependence of human papillomavirus DNA presence in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol. 1996;32:55–62. doi: 10.1016/0964-1955(95)00060-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gillison ML. Human papillomavirus-associated head and neck cancer is a distinct epidemiologic, clinical, and molecular entity. Semin Oncol. 2004;31:744–54. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Haraf DJ, Nodzenski E, Brachman D, et al. Human papilloma virus and p53 in head and neck cancer: clinical correlates and survival. Clin Cancer Res. 1996;2:755–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sisk EA, Soltys SG, Zhu S, Fisher SG, Carey TE, Bradford CR. Human papillomavirus and p53 mutational status as prognostic factors in head and neck carcinoma. Head Neck. 2002;24:841–9. doi: 10.1002/hed.10146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Strome SE, Savva A, Brissett AE, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsils: a molecular analysis of HPV associations. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:1093–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kreimer AR, Clifford GM, Boyle P, Franceschi S. Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas worldwide: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:467–75. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Balaram P, Nalinakumari KR, Abraham E, et al. Human papilloma virus in 91 oral Indian betel quid chewers: high prevalence and multiplicity of infections. Int J Cancer. 1995;61:450–4. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910610403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.D’Costa J, Saranath D, Dedhia P, Sanghvi V, Mehta AR. Detection of HPV-16 genome in human oral cancers and potentially malignant lesions from India. Oral Oncol. 1998;34:413–20. doi: 10.1016/S1368-8375(98)00028-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nagpal JK, Patnaik S, Das BR. Prevalence of high-risk human papilloma virus types and its association with p53 codon 72 polymorphism in tobacco addicted oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients of Eastern India. Int J Cancer. 2002;97:649–53. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Paterson IC, Eveson JW, Prime SS. Molecular changes in oral cancer may reflect aetiology and ethnic origin. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol. 1996;32:150–3. doi: 10.1016/0964-1955(95)00065-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nandakumar A. National Cancer Registry Programme. Consolidated Report of the Population Based Cancer Registries. Incidence and Distribution of Cancer: 1990–96. Bangalore, India: National Cancer Registry Programme (ICMR); 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ganapati M. India has some of the highest cancer rates in the world. BMJ. 2005;330:215. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7485.215-c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.National Cancer Control Programme - Home: National Portal of India. Available at www.archive.india.gov.in/sectors/health_family/index.php?id=11. (accessed April 13, 2014)
  • 40.Regional Cancer Centre Updated January 2014. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_Cancer_Centre (accessed January 27, 2014)
  • 41.WHO Global Health Expenditure Atlas- World Health Organization Updated January 2012. Available at: http://www.who.int/nha/atlas.pdf (accessed January 27, 2014)
  • 42.World Health Statistics 2013 - World Health Organization Available at: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/EN_WHS2013_Full.pdf (accessed January 27, 2014)
  • 43.Prinja S, Bahuguna P, Pinto AD, et al. The cost of universal health care in India: a model based estimate. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Atomic Energy Regulatory Board Government of India 2011 Annual Report. Chapter 3: Safety Review of Radiation Facilities. Available at: http://www.aerb.gov.in/AERBPortal/pages/English/t/annrpt/2011/chapter3.pdf (accessed January 28, 2014)
  • 45.Atomic Energy Regulatory Board Government of India 2006 Annual Report. Safety Surveillance of Radiation Facilities. Available at: http://www.aerb.gov.in/AERBPortal/pages/English/t/annrpt/2006/chapter3.pdf (accessed January 28, 2014)
  • 46.Erikson C, Schulman S, Kosty M, Hanley A. Oncology workforce: results of the ASCO 2007 Program directors survey. J Oncol Pract. 2009;5:62–4. doi: 10.1200/JOP.0922003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chikanda A. Nurse migration from Zimbabwe: analysis of recent trends and implications. Nurse Inq. 2005;12:162–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2005.00273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.World Bank list of economies 2013. Available at: http://muse.jhu.edu/about/order/wdi2013.pdf (accessed April 13, 2014)
  • 49.Pareek U, Trivedi G. Manual of Socio-Economic Status Scale (Rural) New Delhi: Manasayan Publishers; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pai SA. Gutkha banned in Indian states. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3:521. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00862-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chintamani Tuteja A, Khandelwal R, et al. Patient and provider delays in breast cancer patients attending a tertiary care centre: a prospective study. JRSM Short Rep. 2011;2:76. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.011006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kumar S, Heller RF, Pandey U, Tewari V, Bala N, Oanh KT. Delay in presentation of oral cancer: a multifactor analytical study. Natl Med J India. 2001;14:13–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rao M, Rao KD, Shiva Kumar AK, Chatterjee M, Sundarraraman T. Human resources for health in India. Lancet. 2011;377:587–98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61888-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sarin R. Indian National Cancer Control Programme: setting sight on shifting targets. J Cancer Res Ther. 2005;1:240–8. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.19603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Rambam Health Care Campus

RESOURCES