Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Nov 15;12(12):963. doi: 10.1038/nrd3957-c1

The value of single-pathogen antibacterial agents

Brad Spellberg 1, John H Rex 2
PMCID: PMC4012226  NIHMSID: NIHMS578161  PMID: 24232373

As noted by Lewis in a recent Review article (Platforms for antibiotic discovery Nature Rev. Drug. Discov. 12, 371-387 (2013))1, novel strategies for developing antibiotics are needed, as infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are a leading threat to public health2-4. Increasingly, industry, academia and regulators have become interested in the concept of relatively small development programmes focused on areas of high unmet need, such as single-pathogen therapies to treat highly resistant or totally resistant bacterial pathogens4-7. However, given the small number of cases affected per annum, how such agents could be valued to support development programmes has remained unclear.

To help clarify this issue, we estimated the annual incidence, cost and mortality of infections caused by one of the most concerning antibiotic-resistant pathogens: carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). We then developed a cost effectiveness model to determine the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved at various costs with a novel, pathogen-specific agent targeting CRAB in comparison with the standard of care (TABLES 1,2; see methods and references in Supplementary information S1 (table)).

Table 1. Model variables and sources.

Variable Base case point estimate Range Method
Acinetobacter baumannii infections per year United States: 45,900
Globally: 1,000,000
United States: 41,400–83,000
Globally: 600,000–1,400,000
*
Proportion of carbapenem–resistant cases 50% 15–75% *
Proportion of global population living in a developed country 15% 10–20% *
Resulting annual incidence of carbapenem–resistant A. baumannii cases United States: 22,950
Globally: 75,000
NA
Direct health-care cost of resistance per case in the United States (US$) $16,947 $0–$29,188 *
Percentage of health-care cost due to resistance recovered with
effective therapy
50% 25–75% Estimated
Ratio of global health-care costs to US costs 0.4 0.1–0.6 *
Excess cost of resistant cases per year (millions of US$) United States: $389
Globally: $742
NA §
Resistance cost recovered with pathogen–specific therapy per year
(millions of US$)
United States: $194
Globally: $371
NA ||
Excess mortality attributable to ineffective therapy 20% 1–30% *
Excess mortality reduction with effective therapy 50% 25–75% Estimated
Average life years gained with effective therapy per patient 8 4–16 *
Health utility score of a year of life gained for patient with a resistant
pathogen infection
0.6 0.5–0.8 *
Deaths per year due to resistance without pathogen–specific therapy United States: 4,590
Globally: 15,000
230–6,885
750–22,500
Number of lives saved per year with pathogen–specific therapy United States: 2,295
Globally: 7,500
115–3,442
375–11,250
#
Net cost per life saved United States: $15,265
Globally: $50,549
NA **
Net cost per life year saved (US$) United States: $1,908
Globally: $6,319
NA **
Net cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) saved (US$) United States: $3,180
Globally: $10,531
NA **

NA, not applicable.

*

See Supplementary information S1 (table) for references and methodological description.

Number of A. baumannii infections per year multiplied by the proportion of carbapenem-resistant cases, also multiplied by the proportion of the global population living in a developed country for global cases.

§

Number of carbapenem-resistant cases multiplied by excess cost of resistance; for global cases, also multiplied by the global health-care costs compared to the United States.

||

Excess cost of resistance multiplied by percent of health-care cost due to resistance recovered with effective therapy.

Total number of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii cases multiplied by excess mortality attributable to ineffective therapy.

#

Deaths per year due to resistance without pathogen-specific therapy multiplied by excess mortality reduction with effective therapy.

**

Net cost per life saved is equal to the net cost divided by the number of lives saved per year with the pathogen-specific therapy; net cost per life year saved is equal to the net cost per life saved divided by the average life years gained with the effective therapy per patient (TABLE 1); the net cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is equal to the net cost per life year saved divided by the average quality of life per year gained.

Table 2. Cost-effectiveness sensitivity analysis.

Variable (range) Range of variable in
sensitivity analysis
US cost per QALY Global cost
per QALY
Cost of therapy per course $3,000–$30,000 −$11,403 to $44,846 −$4,052
to $52,197
Direct health-care cost of
resistance per case (United
States)
$0–$26,913 $20,833 to –$7,201 $20,833
to $4,472
Ratio of global costs to US
health-care costs
0.1–0.6 NA $14,206
to $8,081
Percent of health-care cost
recovered with effective
therapy
25–75% $12,007 to –$5,646 $15,682
to $5,380
Excess mortality attributable
to ineffective therapy
1–30% $63,604 to $2,120 $210,619
to $7,021
Excess mortality reduction
with effective therapy
25–75% $6,360 to $2,120 $21,062
to $7,020
Average life years gained with
effective therapy per patient
4–16 $6,360 to $1,590 $21,062
to $5,265
Average quality of life per
year gained
0.5–0.8 $3,816 to $2,385 $12,637
to $7,898

NA, not applicable; QALY, quality-adjusted life year.

Based on published frequencies of hospital-acquired infections, the proportion of such infections caused by A. baumannii and the proportion of carbapenem-resistant isolates, we estimated that 22,950 cases of CRAB infection occur annually in the United States and 75,000 globally (in developed nations) (TABLE 1). Based on the number of cases and the cost per case, carbapenem resistance costs health-care systems an annual excess of US$389 million and 4,590 excess deaths in the United States, and an annual excess of $742 million and 15,000 excess deaths globally (TABLE 1).

A cost of $10,000 per course of therapy was used to model QALYs. Net costs per life saved were $15,265 in the United States and $50,549 globally; net costs per life years saved were $1,908 in the United States and $6,319 globally; and costs per QALYs were $3,180 in the United States and $10,531 globally (TABLE 1).

In sensitivity analyses, even at pricing as high as $30,000 per treatment course, the US cost per QALY remained lower than $50,000, which is a commonly used benchmark for an acceptable cost per QALY against which to set drug pricing8 (TABLE 2). Costs of therapy below $8,474 (in the United States) or $4,945 (globally) per course resulted in a negative cost per QALY, indicating that the novel therapy reduced health-care costs.

Even if the costs of resistance were zero, and thus there were no health-care savings enabled by reducing those costs using the pathogen-specific therapy (and conservatively not attributing any costs to the standard-of-care therapy), the costs per QALY at a treatment cost of $10,000 per course were only $20,833 in the United States and globally. Varying global health-care costs at 10-60% of US costs had a negligible effect on the global cost per QALY for a novel pathogen-specific agent.

The variable that most affected the model was the excess mortality rate attributable to resistance (that is, with ineffective current therapy, and thus improvable with new, effective therapy). There are extensive reports in the literature to indicate that carbapenem resistance increases the mortality of A. baumannii infections (see Supplementary information S1 (table)). In the unlikely event that there is no excess mortality caused by resistance, and a new therapy cannot improve mortality compared to the currently available therapy, the costs per QALY go to infinity (as no life years are saved with the new therapy). To enable more quantitative modelling of the scenario in which there is a minimal survival advantage due to the new therapy, we used only a 1% absolute increase in mortality attributable to carbapenem resistance as the lower bound of the sensitivity analysis. In this case, the cost per QALY at a $10,000 treatment cost was $63,604 in the United States and $210,619 globally. In this scenario, the model becomes extremely sensitive to the cost per treatment course. For example slightly lowering the cost per treatment course to $9,073 (in the United States) or $5,545 (globally) achieves a cost per QALY that is lower than $25,000, even if the absolute increase in mortality that is due to resistance is 1%. Even if the mortality attributable to carbapenem resistance was as low as 2-4%, or the pathogen-specific therapy only reduced mortality by 5-10%, or gained only 0.8-1.6 life years per patient, the costs per QALY remained below the $25,000 cut-off at $10,000 per treatment course.

Thus, a novel, single-pathogen agent focused on CRAB could provide benefits to the health-care system while maintaining costs well below the typical benchmarks used to define cost-effective therapy.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Tables

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by US Public Health Service Grants R01 AI081719, R21 AI101750 and R21 AI101492.

Footnotes

Competing interests statement

B.S. own equity in BioAIM, which is developing immunotherapies for infections. BioAIM provided no financial support for these studies. B.S.’s institute has received consulting fees on his behalf from GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, The Medicines Company, Meiji, Adenium, Cardeas, aRigen and Synthetic Biologics and research grants or contracts from Cubist, Pfizer, Esia and Bristol Myers Squibb. B.S. has received speaking honoraria from Cubist. J.H.R. is an employee of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals.

Contributor Information

Brad Spellberg, Division of General Internal Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90502, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.

John H. Rex, AstraZeneca, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451-1215, USA

References

  • 1.Lewis K. Platforms for antibiotic discovery. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 2013;12:371–387. doi: 10.1038/nrd3975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Infectious Diseases Society of America Combating antimicrobial resistance: policy recommendations to save lives. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011;52:S397–S428. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Spellberg B, Bartlett JG, Gilbert DN. The future of antibiotics and resistance. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:299–302. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1215093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.European Medicines Agency Addendum to the note for guidance on evaluation of medicinal products indicated for treatment of bacterial infections (CPMP/EWP/558/95 REV 2) to address indication-specific clinical data. European Medicines Agency. 2012 [online], http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/07/WC500129443.pdf.
  • 5.Infectious Diseases Society of America White paper: recommendations on the conduct of superiority and organism-specific clinical trials of antibacterial agents for the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant bacterial pathogens. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012;55:1031–1046. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alemayehu D, Quinn J, Cook J, Kunkel M, Knirsch CA. A paradigm shift in drug development for treatment of rare multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012;55:562–567. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rex JH, et al. A comprehensive regulatory framework to address the unmet need for new antibacterial treatments. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013;13:269–275. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70293-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Evans C, Tavakoli M, Crawford B. Use of quality adjusted life years and life years gained as benchmarks in economic evaluations: a critical appraisal. Health Care Management Sci. 2004;7:43–49. doi: 10.1023/b:hcms.0000005397.93173.bb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Angus DC, et al. Quality-adjusted survival in the first year after the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001;163:1389–1394. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.6.2005123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Heyland DK, Hopman W, Coo H, Tranmer J, McColl MA. Long-term health-related quality of life in survivors of sepsis. Short Form 36: a valid and reliable measure of health-related quality of life. Crit. Care Med. 2000;28:3599–3605. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200011000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Manns BJ, Lee H, Doig CJ, Johnson D, Donaldson C. An economic evaluation of activated protein C treatment for severe sepsis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;347:993–1000. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa020969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Tables

RESOURCES