Abstract
Identification of novel biomarkers for tumor-initiating cells (TICs) is of critical importance for developing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies against cancers. Here we identified the role of KIAA1114, a full-length translational product of the trophinin gene, as a distinctive marker for TICs in human liver cancer by developing a DNA vaccine-induced monoclonal antibody targeting the putative extracellular domain of KIAA1114. Compared with other established markers of liver TICs, KIAA1114 was unique in that its expression was detected in both alpha fetoprotein (AFP)-positive and AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines with the expression levels of KIAA1114 being positively correlated to their tumorigenic potentials. Notably, KIAA1114 expression was strongly detected in primary hepatic tumor, but neither in the adjacent non-tumorous tissue from the same patient nor normal liver tissue. KIAA1114high cells isolated from HCC cell lines displayed TIC-like features with superior functional and phenotypic traits compared to their KIAA1114low counterparts, including tumorigenic abilities in xenotransplantation model, in vitro colony- and spheroid-forming capabilities, expression of stemness-associated genes, and migratory capacity. Our findings not only address the value of a novel antigen, KIAA1114, as a potential diagnostic factor of human liver cancer, but also as an independent biomarker for identifying TIC populations that could be broadly applied to the heterogeneous HCC subtypes.
Keywords: Tumor-initiating cells, hepatocellular carcinoma, KIAA1114, cell surface marker, monoclonal antibody
INTRODUCTION
Durable complete remission has been rarely achieved with conventional anticancer strategies owing to sustained survival or continuous reappearance of therapy-resistant tumor cells that cause locoregional relapse and distant metastasis. Such observation led to the emergence of “cancer stem cell” hypothesis that tumors, like normal somatic tissues, contain distinct stem cell-like populations having strong regeneration capacity and drug resistance. The exact definition of “cancer stem cells (CSCs)” was recently provided by Valent et al. that CSCs are a subset of neoplastic stem cells that drives indefinite proliferation of malignant clones and production of an apparent cancer [1]. They also suggested that the term “tumor-initiating cells (TICs)”, which has been widely used to describe experimentally identified CSCs, may be applied to characterize cells that are capable of initiating the formation of a detectable, continuously growing tumor in xenograft models [1]. CSCs are thought to stand at the pinnacle of tumor hierarchy and be capable of producing differentiated progenies to recapitulate the clonal heterogeneity of parental tumors [2]. Thus, the resistance of tumors to existing therapies as well as their recurrence and metastatic spread are possibly due to the existence of CSCs bearing indefinite self-renewal capacities. CSCs tend to express elevated levels of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1, pro-survival and DNA repair proteins, all of which contribute to their intrinsic drug resistance [3]. In addition, a number of studies on the metastasis of solid tumors have shown that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) triggers cells located at the invasive edge of the primary tumor to obtain stemness properties along with motility and invasiveness, and these migrating CSCs are endowed with the unique abilities to colonize and initiate tumor growth at the secondary site [4, 5]. Considerable efforts have been made over the last few decades to identify surface markers that are exclusively expressed on CSCs, as developing therapeutics targeting CSCs will undoubtedly open new ways for the treatment of human cancers. Despite the comprehensive list of CSC markers, however, clinical transition of most available markers has been rarely achieved since the application of a sole marker for broad range of tumor subtypes has been frequently hampered by intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity of a given cancer.
In human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a number of TIC markers have been identified including CD133, EpCAM, and CD90, whose functions were well-characterized using both cell lines and primary tumor specimens [6]. Importantly, however, none of these markers were universally expressed within diverse subtypes of liver cancer. In HCC cell lines, which can be classified by alpha fetoprotein (AFP) status [7], expressions of CD133 and EpCAM were only detected in AFP+ cells, whereas CD90 expression was exclusively found in AFP− counterparts [8]. Furthermore, in primary HCC, not only did the level of EpCAM and CD90 expression vary greatly among different individuals, but the cell populations expressing EpCAM and CD90 were distinctively localized without overlap even in a given tumor derived from a single patient [9]. These findings provide clear evidence for the existence of heterogeneity in primary liver cancer and the differential expression pattern of TIC markers depending on HCC subtypes. Therefore, further identification of biomarkers that could be broadly used to identify TICs from multiple tumor subtypes may bring significant clinical benefits in terms of diagnosis and therapy.
MAGE (Melanoma-associated antigen) superfamily proteins have been considered as attractive therapeutic targets owing to their specific expression in cancer. MAGE-D genes are recently discovered MAGE subfamily with distinguished features in terms of their genomic structures and expression patterns. Among the members of MAGE-D family, trophinin (also known as MAGE-D3) is particularly unique in that it can encode multiple translational products having pleiotropic functions in various biological processes. Previous reports have suggested that the presence of numerous translational initiation sites in trophinin mRNA and utilization of different alternative splicing could generate three major types of proteins – KIAA1114, TROPHININ, and MAGPHININs [10, 11]. Although a number of studies have been performed on dissecting the physiological role and function of TROPHININ in embryo implantation and cancer progression [12], only few studies have been conducted on a full-length protein encoded by the trophinin gene known as KIAA1114, whose cDNA coding sequence was initially identified from human brain [13]. Despite the reported expression of KIAA1114 at the transcriptional level, physiological evidence for the existence of KIAA1114 at the protein level has never been reported to date, making it a “hypothetical” protein for more than a decade.
In this study, we provide the first direct evidence for the presence of KIAA1114 at the protein level in cancer cells by utilizing a monoclonal antibody (mAb) raised against the extracellular domain of KIAA1114 antigen and propose its potential role as a prognostic factor, and more significantly, as a distinctive and versatile TIC surface marker for multiple subtypes of human liver cancer.
RESULTS
KIAA1114, the full-length translation product of the trophinin gene, is a transmembrane protein localized on the cell surface
The nomenclature for a full-length protein encoded by the trophinin gene has not been well-defined [11, 14], as experimental evidence for the expression of KIAA1114 in vitro or in vivo has never been provided by earlier studies. In the present study, we used the term “KIAA1114” to describe the full-length product translated from trophinin mRNA (Figure 1A). Hydropathy analysis using the topology prediction program TMpred [15] revealed that KIAA1114 is a transmembrane protein with the N-terminus outside the cell (Supplementary Figure 1). Moreover, as previously suggested [16], KIAA1114 is predicted to contain an intracellular MAGE-homology domain and a trophinin domain that traverses the plasma membrane. Although hydropathy analyses performed in the present and previous studies proposed that a trophinin domain spans the lipid bilayer multiple times [17], a recent review raised a possibility that TROPHININ is a single-pass, type II transmembrane protein that utilizes the majority of its extracellular decapeptide repeats for homophilic adhesion [18]. Accordingly, we proposed that KIAA1114 is a double-pass, type III transmembrane protein with N- and C-termini facing the outside of the cell (Figure 1B). Although thorough structural analysis is required to determine exact location of transmembrane regions, TMPred suggested that the first membrane-spanning segment lies within a MAGE-homology domain and the second one locates near the N-terminus of a trophinin domain (Supplementary Figure 1).
To develop a novel mAb targeting KIAA11114, mice were immunized with the gene encoding partial N-terminal extracellular domain of human MAGE-D3 (Figure 1B). DNA immunization was selected over conventional peptide/protein immunization, as it allows spontaneous formation of native folded proteins in vivo and subsequent generation of high-avidity antibodies recognizing antigens with proper conformation [19, 20]. To investigate whether the resulting mAb, named Kiatomab, could recognize human KIAA1114 protein, Western blot analysis was performed using human kidney 293T cell lysates, as the expression of magphinin/trophinin transcript in renal tissues has been previously suggested [21]. As a result, we found that Kiatomab reacted with a full-length, 138 kDa form of human KIAA1114. Nextly, to examine whether Kiatomab has cross-reactivity to mouse KIAA1114, further analysis was carried out on extracted proteins from mouse brain, which is known to express high level of trophinin transcripts [16]. Immunoblot analysis with Kiatomab revealed a single band corresponding to 196 kDa mouse KIAA1114. The expression of human and mouse KIAA1114 in the same lysates were also identified by the commercial anti-TROPHININ mAb (clone 3–11) which was used as a positive control (Figure 1C, left panel). Moreover, the reactivity of Kiatomab to 293T and primary mouse brain cells was further confirmed by surface staining analysis, implicating the cell surface localization of KIAA1114. In contrast, 3–11 mAb failed to show noticeable reactivity in equivalent experimental conditions (Figure 1C, right panel). These findings differ from a prior study that detected cell surface expression of TROPHININ on stable transfectants of a human testicular seminoma cell line overexpressing TROPHININ using 3–11 mAb by flow cytometry [22]. The exact causes of these differences remain unclear, but the disparities in the nature of cell lines used (normal untransfected cells versus stably transfected cells) and subsequent discrepancies in the copy number of the genes encoding KIAA1114 or TROPHININ may partially be responsible for yielding distinct results.
To assess whether cell surface expression of KIAA1114 correlates with reported expression pattern of trophinin mRNA, KIAA1114 expression in primary cells derived from various murine tissues were analyzed by flow cytometry. Earlier gene expression profiling studies have suggested that trophinin or MAGE-D3 transcript could be detected in mouse brain, testis, and kidney (also in thymus, parathyroid gland, ovary, prostate, epididymus, and embryo), but not in the rest of the organs [16, 21]. In agreement with these reports, flow cytometric analysis with Kiatomab showed that KIAA1114 is expressed on the surface of cells of testis and kidney, but not by the cells of spleen and lung (Figure 1D), suggesting that surface binding of Kiatomab is specific to cells that express trophinin mRNA. KIAA1114 expression in these organs was also validated by Western blot analysis, showing the presence of KIAA1114-specific bands in testis and kidney, but not in spleen and lung.
Overall, these results not only provide the first empirical evidence that KIAA1114 is indeed expressed at the protein level, but also propose that it is localized mainly on the cell surface.
KIAA1114 is overexpressed in human liver cancer cell lines with aggressive characteristics and HCC patient's primary tumor
Previous studies have suggested that the expression of TROPHININ was frequently observed in patients bearing malignant or metastatic tumors, including testicular germ tumor and adenocarcinomas of colon and lung [12]. To investigate whether KIAA1114 shows analogous pattern of expression in cancer, epithelial cell lines of various tissue origin were subjected to flow cytometric analysis. Kiatomab showed reactivity towards the majority of tumor cell lines, although the degree of KIAA1114 expression varied among different cell lines, even within those from the same tumor type (Supplementary Table 1).
Among the various types of tumors screened, we focused on exploring the role of KIAA1114 in human liver cancer, including HCC and cholangiocarcinoma (CC), based on our observation of the potential correlation between KIAA1114 expression levels and tumor progression. Firstly, in CC, KIAA1114 expression was significantly higher in sarcomatoid SCK cells than adenocarcinomatous cell lines, JCK, Cho-CK, and Choi-CK (Figure 2A). A prior study showed that SCK cells not only possessed strong resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, but also expressed elevated levels of genes involved in cancer progression and metastasis as well as EMT-associated markers [23, 24]. As sarcomatoid CCs are known to be more aggressive and have worse prognosis than adenocarcinomatous CCs [24], increased expression of KIAA1114 may contribute to the acquisition of an aggressive phenotype in CC. It was also worth noting that, among three adenocarcinomatous cell lines, Choi-CK cell line established from a stage IVB patient exhibited much higher KIAA1114 expression than did Cho-CK and JCK cells, both of which were derived from stage IVA patients [24].
The possible involvement of KIAA1114 in tumor progression was more thoroughly investigated in HCC. Among three AFP-producing HCC cell lines, HepG2 cells showed the lowest level of KIAA1114 expression, whereas HuH7 cells displayed the highest expression level (Figure 2B). Based on previous studies that characterized in vivo tumorigenicity of different HCC cell lines (tumorigenicity in the order of HuH7 > Hep3B > HepG2) [25], we found that KIAA1114 expression correlates with tumorigenic potential. Similar results were observed in AFP− cell lines where highly tumorigenic SK-Hep-1 cells displayed greater KIAA1114 expression than non-tumorigenic SNU475 cells.
To assess the clinical relevance of KIAA1114 to human liver cancer, tissues lysates obtained from primary HCC, matched non-tumor, and normal liver were analyzed by Western blot for KIAA1114 expression. Kiatomab failed to detect the band that corresponds to KIAA1114 in normal liver tissue from a healthy donor. This result is consistent with a previous study that showed the absence of trophinin (or MAGE-D3)-specific signal in the adult liver of mice by semiquantitative RNA dot blot analysis [16]. More importantly, KIAA1114 expression was solely detected in the primary liver tumor, but not in the adjacent non-malignant hepatic tissue derived from the same patient (Figure 2C).
KIAA1114high cells isolated from HCC cell lines possess TIC-like properties
Positive correlation between tumorigenicity of HCC cell lines and expression level of TIC markers has been observed in earlier studies. For example, the expression of CD133, the first TIC marker identified in liver cancer, was markedly higher in HCC cell lines having tumor-initiating capabilities in vivo compared to those lacking such capacities [26]. Similar results were obtained with another TIC marker CD90, whose expression level was closely associated with tumorigenic as well as metastatic potential of liver cancer cell lines [25]. Based on these results, we hypothesized that KIAA1114 may also be used as a marker to isolate TIC population. To validate this, we first determined whether the expression pattern of KIAA1114 overlapped with those of known liver TIC markers in HCC cell lines (Figure 3). Differential expression of various TIC markers between AFP+ and AFP− cells was also evaluated, as previous studies have shown that distinct prognostic subtypes of HCCs displayed distinguishable levels of expression for stem/maturation markers, including CD133 and CD90 (Supplementary Table 2) [8]. Firstly, the expression of KIAA1114 clearly overlapped with that of CD133 and EpCAM, both of which were expressed in AFP+ HCC cell lines. The level of CD133 and EpCAM expression was associated with tumorigenic potentials of AFP+ cell lines in general, as more tumorigenic Hep3B and HuH7 cells displayed significantly higher expression of those markers while less tumorigenic HepG2 cells showed no apparent expression. Nonetheless, CD133 and EpCAM expressions did not distinguish HuH7 from Hep3B cells whose tumorigenic capacity was known to be inferior to the former. It was also important to note that both CD133 and EpCAM were not or minimally expressed by AFP− HCC cell lines. Conversely, CD90 expression was confined to AFP− cells, in which a fraction of CD90+ cells was co-localized with KIAA1114-expressing cells. Nevertheless, non-tumorigenic SNU475 cells expressed higher level of CD90 than highly tumorigenic SK-Hep-1 cells. CD24 is a recently discovered liver TIC marker whose expression was found to be upregulated in residual chemoresistant HCC xenograft tumors [27]. Although this previous study reported that CD24 was expressed in AFP+ cell lines, including Hep3B and HuH7, as well as in a AFP− cell line, HLE, our results revealed that only AFP+ HuH7 cells expressed significantly high level of CD24 and displayed discernible co-localization of CD24+ and KIAA1114-expressing cells. Accordingly, a definite correlation between the extent of CD24 expression and tumorigenic potentials of cell lines was only observed in AFP+ subtype. Lastly, flow cytometric analysis of CD13, a semiquiescent TIC marker regulating ROS-induced DNA damage [28], showed that its expression could be detected and overlapped with that of KIAA1114 in all cell lines tested, regardless of their AFP expression status. Yet, CD13 expression showed no correlation with tumorigenicity of HCC cell lines in any of the HCC subtypes. These findings suggest that KIAA1114 is a unique biomarker whose expression not only overlaps with diverse liver TIC markers, but also correlates with tumorigenic capacities of HCC cell lines in both AFP+ and AFP− subtypes.
Nextly, to investigate whether KIAA1114 could play a role as an independent marker to identify liver TICs, we isolated cell populations expressing high and low levels of KIAA1114 from AFP+ HuH7 cells and AFP− SK-Hep-1 cells and comparatively assessed their functional capacities of TICs. As with previous studies of CD133 and EpCAM expression analysis in human liver cancer [8, 26], HCC cell lines examined in this study exhibited a Gaussian distribution of KIAA1114 expression levels, rather than displaying a discrete, isolated population of KIAA1114+ cells. Therefore, sorted fractions obtained by FACS-selecting the top 10% most brightly stained cells were designated “KIAA1114high” cells, whereas those derived from the bottom 10% most dimly stained cells were designated “KIAA1114low” cells. Assuming 95% purities of KIAA1114low cells after separation, the purities of KIAA1114high cells in HuH7 and SK-Hep-1 cells were 84.3% and 57.6%, respectively (Figure 4A). Nextly, to evaluate clonogenic potential of isolated subpopulations, colony formation assay was performed. The result showed that the number of colonies generated from KIAA1114high populations was greater than that from KIAA1114low counterparts, regardless of AFP expression status of parental cells (Figure 4B). Analogously, sphere-formation assay, which was used as readout for self-renewal activity, revealed that KIAA1114high cells isolated from either HuH7 or SK-Hep-1 cell line formed significantly more spheroids than did KIAA1114low cells (Figure 4C). These findings suggest that KIAA1114high subsets possess higher proliferative potential and self-renewal capacity than KIAA1114low counterparts. We also noticed differences in qualitative aspects of spheres formed by AFP+ HuH7 and AFP− SK-Hep-1 cells. The size of each spheroid generated by KIAA1114high fraction was much larger than that of KIAA1114low fraction-derived one in HuH7 cells, while the spheres formed by KIAA1114high and KIAA1114low cells sorted from SK-Hep-1 cells were similar in size. Moreover, the overall sphere-forming efficiencies of sorted cells were relatively lower in SK-Hep-1 cells compared to HuH7 cells.
The assessment of differentiating capacity of isolated tumor cells is another criterion for evaluating TICs, as these cells are known to undergo asymmetric divisions to generate heterogeneous populations containing phenotypically diverse cell types [2]. Hence, we analyzed cell surface KIAA1114 expression on short-term passages of KIAA1114high and KIAA1114low subpopulations sorted from HuH7 and SK-Hep-1 cell lines by flow cytometry to analyze whether KIAA1114high HCC cells could produce KIAA1114low cells and vice versa. In both AFP+ and AFP− HCC subtypes, KIAA1114high cells generated increasing numbers of KIAA1114low cells until KIAA1114 expression reached steady-state levels (day 15), as shown by time-dependent decreases in the fluorescence intensities, suggesting the differentiation of KIAA1114high cells into KIAA1114low counterparts (Supplementary Figure 2). Unexpectedly, we also observed gradual upregulation of KIAA1114 expression in KIAA1114low fractions, yielding contradictory results from previous reports of EpCAM and CD24 where EpCAM− and CD24− HCC fractions maintained their low marker expression status for 2 weeks in culture, respectively [8, 27]. However, our results are in line with a prior study of CD133 that showed increased CD133 surface expression upon culture in CD133− subsets isolated from HCC cell lines as well as xenograft tumors. These data were interpreted as the consequence of asymmetric division undergone by a small subset (~5%) of CD133+ cells contaminated in the CD133− population [26]. Therefore, considering the moderate purity of sorted HCC cells used in the present study (Figure 4A), it could be presumed that KIAA1114low subsets contain contaminating KIAA1114high cells abundant enough to generate both KIAA1114high and KIAA1114low populations.
Previous studies have shown that the majority of TICs, including those identified in HCC, exhibited elevated expression levels of “stemness” genes, which are defined as genes required for stem cell maintenance by conferring pluripotency, compared to their differentiated counterparts [29, 30]. In addition, TICs often display upregulated expression of ABC superfamily members that render them resistant to various types of therapies. Therefore, we assessed the expression levels of 8 stemness-associated genes (β-catenin, BMI-1, c-Myc, GDF3, KLF4, Nanog, POU5F1, and ZFP42) and 2 ABC transporter genes (ABCB1 and ABCG2) in KIAA1114high and KIAA1114low cells (Figure 4D). In HuH7 cells, 5 stemness-related genes (β-catenin, BMI1, c-Myc, KLF4, and ZFP42) and all of ABC transporter genes were upregulated in KIAA1114high fraction in a statistically significant manner. Among them, the expression levels of ABCG2, c-Myc, and ZFP42 were 3- to 5-fold higher in KIAA1114high cells compared to KIAA1114low cells. Contrarily, the overexpression of stemness-associated genes was not clearly observed in AFP− SK-Hep-1 cell line with only 4 genes (ABCG2, BMI, c-Myc, and KLF4) showing marginal upregulation in KIAA1114high cells compared to KIAA1114low cells. Since AFP− HCC cell lines are reported to express genes related to EMT and mesenchymal lineages rather than hepatic stem cell-specific markers [9], sorted KIAA1114high and KIAA1114low SK-Hep-1 cells were then subjected to transwell migration assay, a common method for analyzing post-EMT activity [31]. Intriguingly, KIAA1114high fractions showed more than 3-fold higher migration rate compared to KIAA1114low counterpart. On the other hand, KIAA1114high and KIAA1114low cells isolated from HuH7 cells displayed comparable migration capacities (Figure 4E). These results suggest that KIAA1114high cells derived from SK-Hep-1 cells may retain discrete characteristics and gene expression profiles compared with those from HuH7 cells.
As mentioned earlier, the definition of TICs involves empirical evaluation of functional qualities of a given cell population, especially in its capacity to initiate and sustain tumor growth in immunodeficient mice. Accordingly, we assessed in vivo tumorigenic capacities of KIAA1114high and KIAA1114low cells by subcutaneously injecting them into beige/nude/xid mice. For HuH7 cell line, as few as 1,000 KIAA1114high cells were sufficient to establish tumors in 100% of mice, while the same number of KIAA1114low cells was unable to develop tumors in any of the mice injected. As many as 100,000 KIAA1114low cells were required to accomplish consistent tumor generation, indicating about 100-fold lower tumor-forming efficiency compared to KIAA1114high counterpart. In the case of SK-Hep-1 cell line, isolated KIAA1114high fraction not only developed tumors in 2 out of 4 mice with 10,000 cells, but also achieved 100% tumor incidence with 100,000 cells. On the contrary, KIAA1114low fraction failed to initiate tumors in any mice, even with the highest cell number examined (100,000 cells/site) (Table 1). Notably, 10,000 HuH7-sorted KIAA1114high cells formed much larger tumors than did 100,000 SK-Hep-1-isolated KIAA1114high cells in the same amount of time (Figure 4F). This result is consistent with a previous study that EpCAM+ cells derived from AFP+ HCCs generated much larger and faster-growing tumors than did CD90+ cells purified from AFP− HCCs [9].
Table 1. In vivo tumorigenicity of KIAA1114high and KIAA1114low cells isolated from HuH7 and SK-Hep-1 cell lines.
Cell type | Cell numbers injected | No. of mice with tumors / Total No. of mice injected | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
2 Months | 3 months | 4 months | ||
HuH7 KIAA1114high | 1,000 | 0/4 | 2/4 | 2/2 |
10,000 | 2/4 | 2/2 | ||
100,000 | 4/4 | |||
HuH7 KIAA1114low | 1,000 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 |
10,000 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 1/4 | |
100,000 | 1/4 | 2/3 | 1/1 | |
SK-Hep-1 KIAA1114high | 1,000 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 |
10,000 | 0/4 | 1/4 | 1/3 | |
100,000 | 3/4 | 1/1 | ||
SK-Hep-1 KIAA1114low | 1,000 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 |
10,000 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 | |
100,000 | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/4 |
DISCUSSION
Cancer stem cells (CSCs), a tumorigenic subpopulation of cancer cells that drives unlimited propagation of malignant clones, are regarded as the major source of tumor recurrence and metastasis [32]. Accordingly, the identification and functional characterization of CSC-specific markers and phenotypic analysis of these marker-expressing cells are crucial for developing CSC-directed therapies. In the present study, we proposed the role of a novel tumor-associated antigen, KIAA1114, as a bona fide marker for liver CSCs, based on the functional and phenotypic features displayed by isolated KIAA1114high HCCs in several CSC assays. Firstly, anchorage-dependent colony formation assay revealed that KIAA1114high cells derived from both AFP+ and AFP− cell lines retained superior proliferative capacities than KIAA1114low cells. These results are in line with previous reports that showed enhanced colony-forming abilities of CD133+ and EpCAM+ HCC cells compared to their respective CD133− and EpCAM− counterparts, but contrast with the studies that displayed slower growth rate of CD13+ and CD24+ sorted cells than corresponding marker-negative fractions [8, 26-28]. These findings suggest that KIAA1114high cells do not possess quiescent properties, which are occasionally ascribed to CSCs [2], as do CD13+ and CD24+ HCCs. Secondly, non-adherent sphere assay revealed that KIAA1114high subsets exhibited stronger self-renewal capacities than KIAA1114low subsets in both AFP+ and AFP− HCCs. Analogous results were obtained in a prior study, where CD133+ and EpCAM+ cells isolated from HuH7 cell line exhibited higher spheroid-forming efficiencies than CD133− and EpCAM− cells, respectively [33]. Thirdly, and most importantly, in vivo limiting dilution assay provided direct evidence that KIAA1114high fractions sorted from HCC cell lines had superior tumor-initiating capacities compared to KIAA1114low cells. Since the operational definition of CSC was developed based on the capacity of cells to initiate and maintain tumor growth in immunodeficient mice [1], it might be feasible to designate KIAA1114high HCCs as CSCs, or more accurately, TICs. Collectively, our findings suggest that KIAA1114high HCCs recapitulate some of the basic but essential features of existing liver TICs, including enhanced capacities for proliferation, self-renewal, and in vivo tumor generation, as those exhibited by CD133+ and EpCAM+ cells.
The reliability of existing liver TIC markers has been frequently challenged based on the heterogeneous and polyclonal nature of HCC that distinct phenotypic markers are expressed by different histological subtypes [34]. Previous studies have shown that HCC can be classified into four subtypes based on EpCAM and AFP expression status and each subtype has different molecular signatures and discrete signaling pathways that regulate its biological activities [35]. These results led us to focus on the investigation of differential expression patterns of KIAA1114 and known liver TIC markers between AFP+ and AFP− subtypes. Consistent with previous studies, our results showed that AFP+ cell lines expressed CD133 and EpCAM, while AFP− cells only expressed CD90 [8]. On the other hand, KIAA1114 expression was detected in all cell lines tested and isolated KIAA1114high cells exhibited much stronger tumorigenic potential than did KIAA1114low cells in both HCC subtypes. Interestingly, however, stemness-associated gene expression profiles and migratory properties of KIAA1114high subsets were shown to be different in AFP+ HuH7 cells and AFP− SK-Hep-1 cells. HuH7-isolated KIAA1114high cells exhibited tendency to express significantly higher levels of stemness genes while maintaining equivalent migration capacities compared to KIAA1114low cells. In contrast, SK-Hep-1 sorted KIAA1114high cells displayed markedly enhanced migration without the upregulation of stemness-related markers. Such discrepancies in the nature of TICs isolated from distinct HCC subtypes is well-characterized in a recent study, which showed that EpCAM+ cells isolated from AFP+ cell lines exerted highly tumorigenic properties in vivo and expressed hepatic stem cell-associated genes while lacking capacities to metastasize [9]. Conversely, CD90+ cells was unable to produce large subcutaneous tumors but capable of forming lung metastases with upregulated expression of mesenchymal lineage markers. Although genomic profiles of KIAA1114high and KIAA1114low cells were not extensively investigated in the current study, it is reasonable to predict that KIAA1114high cells purified from SK-Hep-1 cells might have increased expression of genes associated with metastatic progression or EMT. Aside from KIAA1114, CD13 was the only marker to be expressed in both AFP+ and AFP− cell lines, but it remains to be determined whether CD13 could mark tumorigenic populations in AFP− HCCs. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental study to isolate tumorigenic, liver TIC-like populations from both AFP+ and AFP− HCC subtypes utilizing a single biomarker.
A potential function of MAGE family members as a marker for (cancer) stem cells has been initially proposed by Simpson et al. that cancer-testis antigens encoded by genes located on X chromosome, including MAGE-A, -B, -C, and -D, are frequently expressed in the spermatogonia, and therefore serve a putative role in marking male germ line stem cells [36]. Definitive experimental evidence for the association of MAGE proteins with stem cell phenotype was later provided by expression profiling studies of various types of human stem cells. For instance, MAGE-A and N-RAGE (also known as MAGE-D1) were expressed by mesenchymal stem cells, but their expression levels decreased upon the differentiation of stem cells [37]. Similarly, the expression of MAGE-A3 and -A6 were detected in embryonic stem cells, but not in differentiated derivatives [38]. In addition, global gene expression analysis of CD133+ cells isolated from four different cord blood units identified trophinin as one of 32 genes that encode membrane proteins selectively expressed on CD133+ hematopoietic stem cells [39]. Although specific functions and mechanisms of these MAGE proteins in stem cell biology remain largely unknown, all of the above-mentioned studies implicate the potential role of MAGE family members in the regulation of stem cell maintenance or differentiation. More importantly, gene expression analysis of 31 different cancer-testis antigens in tumor spheres derived from 4 human glioma cell lines and a primary tumor specimen revealed that MAGE-D3 (which is equivalent to trophinin) was the only gene that showed increased expression in all examined tumor spheres compared to their differentiated counterparts [40]. Since sphere-forming cells are known to exhibit higher self-renewal capacity, proliferative potential, drug resistance, and in vivo tumorigenic/metastatic capabilities than parental tumor cells [32, 41], trophinin gene products including KIAA1114 may be involved in promoting one or more of these biological processes in glioma model as well. Therefore, these findings raise the possibility that KIAA1114 may not only play a role as an alternate marker of hematopoietic stem cells, but also act as a broad-spectrum TIC marker for various types of tumors, including HCC and glioma.
In summary, our study characterized KIAA1114 as a novel cell-surface marker of liver TICs using human HCC cell lines and showed that isolated KIAA1114high fractions from two different HCC subsets (AFP+ and AFP−) displayed subtype-specific TIC features, resembling those of EpCAM+ TICs in AFP+ HCC and CD90+ TICs in AFP− HCC. Although the applicability of KIAA1114 as a single biomarker to isolate TICs from multiple HCC subtypes offers unique advantages over other established TIC markers, it is crucial to validate its function by sorting KIAA1114high cells from clinical samples. We could not resolve this issue due to stringent regulatory restrictions on the acquisition of human primary solid tumor specimens imposed by institutional review boards in Korean domestic hospitals. However, substantial evidence has been provided by a number of studies that many known liver TIC markers verified in cell lines were also applicable to primary HCC. For instance, a previous study has shown that functional CD90+ cells could be isolated from 13 out of 28 HCC specimens and all of them could initiate tumor growth in immunodeficient mice with ≤10,000 cells within four months [25]. Similarly, EpCAM+ and CD24+ cells derived from patient samples displayed superior tumorigenic capabilities in vivo than did EpCAM− and CD24−counterparts, respectively [8, 27]. Considering the overlapping pattern of expression between existing liver TIC markers and KIAA1114 and the resemblance in the functional features of isolated KIAA1114high cells to those of EpCAM+ and CD90+ cells, it is tempting to speculate that KIAA1114 could serve a parallel role in patient-derived tumors as a TIC marker.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Anti-human KIAA1114 mAb generation
Murine hybridoma cell line producing anti-KIAA1114 mAb was kindly provided by Genexine Co., Ltd.. Briefly, Balb/c mice were immunized with a gene encoding N-terminal region (amino acids 1-366) of human KIAA1114. Splenocytes were collected from immunized mice and fused with SP2/0 myeloma cells. The hybridoma clone secreting mAb with the strongest antigen binding activity was selected and further characterized. mAb derived from selected clone was designated Kiatomab (IgG2b, κ). For the production of Kiatomab, Balb/c mice were first intraperitoneally treated with 500 μl Pristane (Sigma Aldrich). After 7 days, 5 X 106 cells of hybridoma were injected intraperitoneally and the ascitic fluid was collected when abdominal bloating was observed. The purification of mAb was conducted with the AKTA purifier system using HiTrap Protein G HP column (GE Healthcare).
Cell lines
Human CC cell lines and a HCC cell line, SH-J1, were kindly provided by Dr. Dae-Ghon Kim (Chonbuk National University Medical School, Korea) and grown in DMEM (WelGENE). Other HCC cell lines were generously provided by Dr. Kwan Yong Choi (POSTECH, Korea) and grown in RPMI1640 (WelGENE). Human embryonic kidney 293T cell line was purchased from American Type Culture Collection and maintained in recommended medium. All medium was supplemented with 10% FBS (Thermo Scientific) and antibiotic-antimycotic (Invitrogen).
Mice
Balb/c mice were purchased from Charles River Breeding Laboratories. Beige/nude/XID mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Animals were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of POSTECH Biotech Center.
Western Blotting
Cell lysis was performed as previously described [42]. Whole cell lysates were incubated in 37°C for 30 minutes, resolved in 4–15% Mini-PROTEIN TGX Precast Gel (Bio-Rad), and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman). Membranes were blocked 1 hour with 5% non fat dry milk in 0.1% Tween TBS (TBST) and further incubated overnight at 4°C with Kiatomab or anti-TROPHININ mAb (clone 3–11) (Abcam) diluted in blocking buffer. After washing with TBST, membranes were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Bio-rad). Immunoreactive bands were stained with Super Signal West Pico Chemiluminescent kit (Pierce) and exposed to X-ray film. For Western blot analysis of extracted proteins from tissue, mouse brain tissues were minced and homogenized in 3ml RIPA buffer per gram of tissue. After centrifugation, supernatant containing the total cell lysate was removed and subjected to SDS-PAGE. Human liver whole tissue lysate and paired primary tumor and normal tissues were purchased from Novus Biologicals.
Flow cytometry
Single cell suspensions from diverse murine tissues were prepared as previously described [43]. Cells were resuspended in FACS buffer (PBS/1% FBS) containing Kiatomab or purified mouse IgG2b isotype antibody (eBioscience) and incubated on ice for 15 minutes. After being washed with FACS buffer, cells were incubated with allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig (BD Biosciences). For double fluorescence staining, cells were additionally stained with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated CD133 (MiltenyiBiotec), CD90, EpCAM, CD24, or CD13 (eBioscience). Single cell sorting was performed with MoFlo XDP cell sorter (Beckman Coulter) by gating the top 10% of the most brightly fluorescent cells and the bottom 10% of the most dimly fluorescent cells.
Colony and sphere formation assay
Colony- and sphere-formation assays were performed as previously described [26, 44]. Cells were seeded at a density of 2000 cells per well and the resulting colonies or spheres were counted under the microscope at day 14.
Stemness gene expression analysis
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis from isolated KIAA1114high and KIAA1114low cells were performed using Total RNA Extraction Kit (Intron Biotechnology) and QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen), respectively. Real-time PCR was performed on a Viaa 7 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) with various stemness gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table 3) and SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems).
Transwell migration assay
5 X 104 cells of HuH7-sorted or 1 X 104 cells of SK-Hep-1 sorted fractions were resuspended in serum-free medium and placed into the upper chambers of 24-well transwell (8 μm pore size; Corning). The lower chambers were filled with the medium containing 10% FBS. After incubating transwells at 37°C for 16 hours, migrated cells were stained using Diff-Quik Stain Set (Dade Behring, Inc.) and counted in 16 random fields under the microscope.
In vivo tumorigenicity assay
Beige/nude/XID mice were subcutaneously injected with various numbers of sorted KIAA1114high and KIAA1114low cells. Mice were monitored up to 4 months for the formation of palpable tumors.
Statistics
Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences between groups were calculated by a 2-tailed Student t test.
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES AND TABLES
Acknowledgments
We thank Kwan Seok Lee at POSTECH for his devoted animal care, So Young Choi and Ji Young Lee at Genexine Co. for providing the hybridoma. This work was supported by of the 21C Frontier Functional Human Genome Project from the Ministry of Science & Technology in Korea (FG06-11-12), Korean Health Technology R&D Project from the Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, in Korea (A092258), and Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2012R1A1A2044032).
Footnotes
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
REFERENCES
- 1.Valent P, Bonnet D, De Maria R, Lapidot T, Copland M, Melo JV, Chomienne C, Ishikawa F, Schuringa JJ, Stassi G, Huntly B, Herrmann H, Soulier J, Roesch A, Schuurhuis GJ, Wohrer S, et al. Cancer stem cell definitions and terminology: the devil is in the details. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(11):767–775. doi: 10.1038/nrc3368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Magee JA, Piskounova E, Morrison SJ. Cancer stem cells: impact, heterogeneity, and uncertainty. Cancer Cell. 2012;21(3):283–296. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abdullah LN, Chow EK. Mechanisms of chemoresistance in cancer stem cells. Clinical and translational medicine. 2013;2(1):3. doi: 10.1186/2001-1326-2-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, Brooks M, Reinhard F, Zhang CC, Shipitsin M, Campbell LL, Polyak K, Brisken C, Yang J, Weinberg RA. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 2008;133(4):704–715. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Malanchi I, Santamaria-Martinez A, Susanto E, Peng H, Lehr HA, Delaloye JF, Huelsken J. Interactions between cancer stem cells and their niche govern metastatic colonization. Nature. 2012;481(7379):85–89. doi: 10.1038/nature10694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yamashita T, Wang XW. Cancer stem cells in the development of liver cancer. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(5):1911–1918. doi: 10.1172/JCI66024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee JS, Thorgeirsson SS. Functional and genomic implications of global gene expression profiles in cell lines from human hepatocellular cancer. Hepatology. 2002;35(5):1134–1143. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.33165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yamashita T, Ji J, Budhu A, Forgues M, Yang W, Wang HY, Jia H, Ye Q, Qin LX, Wauthier E, Reid LM, Minato H, Honda M, Kaneko S, Tang ZY, Wang XW. EpCAM-positive hepatocellular carcinoma cells are tumor-initiating cells with stem/progenitor cell features. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(3):1012–1024. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yamashita T, Honda M, Nakamoto Y, Baba M, Nio K, Hara Y, Zeng SS, Hayashi T, Kondo M, Takatori H, Yamashita T, Mizukoshi E, Ikeda H, Zen Y, Takamura H, Wang XW, et al. Discrete nature of EpCAM+ and CD90+ cancer stem cells in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2013;57(4):1484–1497. doi: 10.1002/hep.26168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nadano D, Sugihara K, Paria BC, Saburi S, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Nakayama J, Fukuda MN. Significant differences between mouse and human trophinins are revealed by their expression patterns and targeted disruption of mouse trophinin gene. Biol Reprod. 2002;66(2):313–321. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod66.2.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aoyama J, Akazawa Y, Kasahara K, Higashiyama Y, Kikuchi I, Fukumoto Y, Saburi S, Nakayama Y, Fukuda MN, Yamaguchi N. Nuclear localization of magphinins, alternative splicing products of the human trophinin gene. J Cell Biochem. 2008;103(3):765–777. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fukuda MN, Sugihara K, Nakayama J. Trophinin: what embryo implantation teaches us about human cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008;7(8):1165. doi: 10.4161/cbt.7.8.6696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kikuno R, Nagase T, Ishikawa K, Hirosawa M, Miyajima N, Tanaka A, Kotani H, Nomura N, Ohara O. Prediction of the coding sequences of unidentified human genes. XIV. The complete sequences of 100 new cDNA clones from brain which code for large proteins in vitro. DNA Res. 1999;6(3):197–205. doi: 10.1093/dnares/6.3.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Saburi S, Nadano D, Akama TO, Hirama K, Yamanouchi K, Naito K, Tojo H, Tachi C, Fukuda MN. The trophinin gene encodes a novel group of MAGE proteins, magphinins, and regulates cell proliferation during gametogenesis in the mouse. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2001;276(52):49378–49389. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108584200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hofmann K, Stoffel W. PROFILEGRAPH: an interactive graphical tool for protein sequence analysis. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992;8(4):331–337. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.4.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chomez P, De Backer O, Bertrand M, De Plaen E, Boon T, Lucas S. An overview of the MAGE gene family with the identification of all human members of the family. Cancer Res. 2001;61(14):5544–5551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fukuda MN, Sato T, Nakayama J, Klier G, Mikami M, Aoki D, Nozawa S. Trophinin and tastin, a novel cell adhesion molecule complex with potential involvement in embryo implantation. Genes Dev. 1995;9(10):1199–1210. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.10.1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fukuda MN, Sugihara K. Trophinin in cell adhesion and signal transduction. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2012;4:342–350. doi: 10.2741/381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Boyle JS, Silva A, Brady JL, Lew AM. DNA immunization: induction of higher avidity antibody and effect of route on T cell cytotoxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94(26):14626–14631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bates MK, Zhang G, Sebestyen MG, Neal ZC, Wolff JA, Herweijer H. Genetic immunization for antibody generation in research animals by intravenous delivery of plasmid DNA. Biotechniques. 2006;40(2):199–208. doi: 10.2144/000112088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Park SK, Yoon J, Wang L, Shibata TK, Motamedchaboki K, Shim KJ, Chang MS, Lee SH, Tamura N, Hatakeyama S, Nadano D, Sugihara K, Fukuda MN. Enhancement of mouse sperm motility by trophinin-binding peptide. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:101. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hatakeyama S, Ohyama C, Minagawa S, Inoue T, Kakinuma H, Kyan A, Arai Y, Suga T, Nakayama J, Kato T, Habuchi T, Fukuda MN. Functional correlation of trophinin expression with the malignancy of testicular germ cell tumor. Cancer Res. 2004;64(12):4257–4262. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yoon H, Min JK, Lee JW, Kim DG, Hong HJ. Acquisition of chemoresistance in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells by activation of AKT and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2011;405(3):333–337. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.11.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Seol MA, Chu IS, Lee MJ, Yu GR, Cui XD, Cho BH, Ahn EK, Leem SH, Kim IH, Kim DG. Genome-wide expression patterns associated with oncogenesis and sarcomatous transdifferentation of cholangiocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yang ZF, Ho DW, Ng MN, Lau CK, Yu WC, Ngai P, Chu PW, Lam CT, Poon RT, Fan ST. Significance of CD90+ cancer stem cells in human liver cancer. Cancer Cell. 2008;13(2):153–166. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ma S, Chan KW, Hu L, Lee TK, Wo JY, Ng IO, Zheng BJ, Guan XY. Identification and characterization of tumorigenic liver cancer stem/progenitor cells. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2542–2556. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee TK, Castilho A, Cheung VC, Tang KH, Ma S, Ng IO. CD24(+) liver tumor-initiating cells drive self-renewal and tumor initiation through STAT3-mediated NANOG regulation. Cell stem cell. 2011;9(1):50–63. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Haraguchi N, Ishii H, Mimori K, Tanaka F, Ohkuma M, Kim HM, Akita H, Takiuchi D, Hatano H, Nagano H, Barnard GF, Doki Y, Mori M. CD13 is a therapeutic target in human liver cancer stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(9):3326–3339. doi: 10.1172/JCI42550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sakaguchi T, Nishimoto M, Miyagi S, Iwama A, Morita Y, Iwamori N, Nakauchi H, Kiyonari H, Muramatsu M, Okuda A. Putative “stemness” gene jam-B is not required for maintenance of stem cell state in embryonic, neural, or hematopoietic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(17):6557–6570. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00729-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hui C, Safwani W, Chin S, Malek A, Hassan N, Fazil M, Rooshdi R, Hamid A, Sathappan S. Human serum promotes the proliferation but not the stemness genes expression of human adipose-derived stem cells. Biotechnol Bioproc E. 2012;17(6):1306–1313. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Medici D, Nawshad A. Type I collagen promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition through ILK-dependent activation of NF-kappaB and LEF-1. Matrix Biol. 2010;29(3):161–165. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2009.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cao L, Zhou Y, Zhai B, Liao J, Xu W, Zhang R, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen L, Qian H, Wu M, Yin Z. Sphere-forming cell subpopulations with cancer stem cell properties in human hepatoma cell lines. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen Y, Yu D, Zhang H, He H, Zhang C, Zhao W, Shao RG. CD133(+)EpCAM(+) phenotype possesses more characteristics of tumor initiating cells in hepatocellular carcinoma Huh7 cells. Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8(7):992–1004. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.4454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Medema JP. Cancer stem cells: the challenges ahead. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15(4):338–344. doi: 10.1038/ncb2717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yamashita T, Forgues M, Wang W, Kim JW, Ye Q, Jia H, Budhu A, Zanetti KA, Chen Y, Qin LX, Tang ZY, Wang XW. EpCAM and alpha-fetoprotein expression defines novel prognostic subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2008;68(5):1451–1461. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Simpson AJ, Caballero OL, Jungbluth A, Chen YT, Old LJ. Cancer/testis antigens, gametogenesis and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(8):615–625. doi: 10.1038/nrc1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cronwright G, Le Blanc K, Gotherstrom C, Darcy P, Ehnman M, Brodin B. Cancer/testis antigen expression in human mesenchymal stem cells: down-regulation of SSX impairs cell migration and matrix metalloproteinase 2 expression. Cancer Res. 2005;65(6):2207–2215. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lifantseva N, Koltsova A, Krylova T, Yakovleva T, Poljanskaya G, Gordeeva O. Expression patterns of cancer-testis antigens in human embryonic stem cells and their cell derivatives indicate lineage tracks. Stem cells international. 2011;2011:795239. doi: 10.4061/2011/795239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jaatinen T, Hemmoranta H, Hautaniemi S, Niemi J, Nicorici D, Laine J, Yli-Harja O, Partanen J. Global gene expression profile of human cord blood-derived CD133+ cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24(3):631–641. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yawata T, Nakai E, Park KC, Chihara T, Kumazawa A, Toyonaga S, Masahira T, Nakabayashi H, Kaji T, Shimizu K. Enhanced expression of cancer testis antigen genes in glioma stem cells. Mol Carcinog. 2010;49(6):532–544. doi: 10.1002/mc.20614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gu W, Yeo E, McMillan N, Yu C. Silencing oncogene expression in cervical cancer stem-like cells inhibits their cell growth and self-renewal ability. Cancer Gene Ther. 2011;18(12):897–905. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2011.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim SW, Kim SJ, Park SH, Yang HG, Kang MC, Choi YW, Kim SM, Jeun SS, Sung YC. Complete regression of metastatic renal cell carcinoma by multiple injections of engineered mesenchymal stem cells expressing dodecameric TRAIL and HSV-TK. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(2):415–427. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Meng Z, Qin G, Zhang B, Bai J. DNA damaging effects of sulfur dioxide derivatives in cells from various organs of mice. Mutagenesis. 2004;19(6):465–468. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geh058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kim J, Jung J, Lee SJ, Lee JS, Park MJ. Cancer stem-like cells persist in established cell lines through autocrine activation of EGFR signaling. Oncol Lett. 2012;3(3):607–612. doi: 10.3892/ol.2011.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.