Abstract
Globally, about 70% of cervical cancers are associated with human papillomavirus (HPV)-16 or HPV-18 infection. A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies in China showed that HPV was present in 98% of cervical cancer samples. The HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine Cervarix®* has shown a high level of protection against HPV-16/18 infections and associated cervical lesions. This phase I trial (NCT00549900) assessed the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the vaccine in Chinese. Thirty healthy Chinese females, aged 15 to 45 years with a median age of 29.5 years, received three doses of Cervarix® in Months 0, 1, and 6. Safety was assessed via recording solicited local and systemic symptoms within 7 days and unsolicited symptoms within 30 days after each vaccination. Serious adverse events, new onset of chronic diseases, and other medically significant conditions were recorded throughout this trial. As an exploratory objective, HPV-16/18 antibody titers were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum samples collected in Months 0 and 7. Pain at the injection site was the most frequently reported local symptom. Two subjects reported medically significant adverse events. Both cases were assessed as unrelated to vaccination by the investigator. In Month 7, 100% seroconversion was observed for both anti– HPV-16 and anti–HPV-18 with high geometric mean antibody titers. HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine, evaluated for the first time in Chinese females, was generally well tolerated and immunogenic, as previously shown in global studies.
Keywords: Cervical cancer, Chinese females, human papillomavirus, HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine, phase I trial
Cervical cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death among women globally[1]. Epidemiologic studies, coupled with detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in up to 99.7% of cervical cancers from all geographic areas, convincingly demonstrate that oncogenic HPV infection is the causative agent of cervical cancer[2]. This has been confirmed in China in a recently published meta-analysis[3] as well as in a centralized, systematic HPV prevalence survey in tissue specimens from seven different geographic regions in Chinas[4].
Approximately 30 to 40 HPV types infect the human genital tract[5], at least 15 of which are considered oncogenic and associated with cervical cancer[6]. Globally, about 70% of all cases of cervical cancer are associated with HPV-16 and -18, followed by HPV-45, -31, -33, and -52 [6]. A generally similar distribution has been demonstrated in China, with some variations[3],[4],[7]. The most common HPV type found in Chinese women with squamous cell carcinoma was HPV-16 (76.7%), followed by HPV-18 (7.8%), HPV-31 (3.2%), HPV-52 (2.2%), and HPV-58 (2.2%); the most common types found in Chinese women with adenocarcinoma were HPV-16 (35.3%) and HPV-18 (29.4%)[4].
The high concordance of HPV infections with the incidence of cervical cancer underscores the importance of prophylactic vaccination against this disease, especially in rural areas where implementation of cytological screening schemes may exert a significant burden on healthcare systems[8]. An analysis of a 2002 World Health Organization survey found that in China there was only a 23% effective screening coverage, defined as the proportion of women aged 25 to 64 years who reported having had a pelvic examination and Pap smear in the preceding 3 years[9]. Therefore, an effective vaccine designed to prevent cervical cancer has public health relevance and should protect against multiple oncogenic HPV types, including at least HPV-16 and -18.
The prophylactic HPV vaccine, Cervarix®* (GlaxoSmithkline Biologicals, Belgium), has been licensed in over 110 countries. It is a bivalent vaccine, containing HPV-16 and -18 L1 protein virus-like particles (VLPs), formulated with an adjuvant system AS04 (aluminium hydroxide [AI (OH)3] combined with 3-O-desacyl-4′-monophosphoryl lipid A). Over 40 000 subjects have been vaccinated in clinical trials of this vaccine, and a recent integrated safety and efficacy analysis of 11 trials showed that the vaccine was generally well tolerated in over 16 000 females (≥ 10 years old) who received at least one dose[10]. The importance of the adjuvant system to generate and maintain an enhanced immune response, compared with a similar VLP vaccine adjuvanted with AI(OH)3 alone, has been demonstrated in humans[11],[12]. Furthermore, the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine has shown high efficacy against HPV-16/18 infections and associated cervical neoplasia[13], with long-term efficacy demonstrated up to 7.3 years[14]. This vaccine also affords cross-protection against some other oncogenic HPV types (-31, -33, and -45) not included in the current vaccine, but phylogenetically related to HPV-16 and -18[13].
Currently, there are no HPV vaccines licensed in China. As required by the State Food and Drug Administration regulations, the present study (the first HPV L1-VLP vaccine trial in mainland China) was undertaken to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in healthy Chinese females, prior to larger safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy studies.
Subjects and Methods
Study population
Healthy females aged 15 to 45 years (inclusive), of Chinese origin and residing in China, were enrolled into the study in December 2007. Written informed consent was obtained from the subjects. For subjects below the legal age of consent (i.e. <18 years old), written informed consent was obtained from the subject and her parent or legally acceptable representative. The trial was conducted according to the Good Clinical Practice, in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and following approval by the Ethics Review Committees from appropriate centers according to local rules and regulations.
Subjects were required to undergo a negative urine pregnancy test before inclusion and prior to each vaccination. Subjects of childbearing potential were required to be abstinent or to use adequate contraception for 30 days prior to vaccination and for 2 months after the last vaccination. Other exclusion criteria included chronic administration of immunosuppressant/immune-modifying drugs and taking any other investigational products.
Study design
The phase I, open-labeled trial was performed in a single center in Jiangsu Province (China) in which subjects were vaccinated with the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine Cervarix®. The vaccine (0.5 mL in individual pre-filled syringes) was administered intramuscularly into the deltoid muscle of the non-dominant arm in Months 0, 1, and 6 (one dose at each visit). The subjects were observed closely for at least 30 min after each dosing, with medical treatment readily available in case of a rare anaphylactic reaction. Four visits were planned per subject, scheduled in Months 0, 1, 6, and 7.
Safety and reactogenicity
Safety and reactogenicity in the total vaccinated cohort were the primary endpoints of the study. Diary cards were used by the participants to record the occurrence of solicited local and systemic symptoms within 7 days and unsolicited events within 30 days following each vaccination. Serious adverse events, pregnancies and their outcomes, new onset of chronic diseases and medically significant conditions were evaluated. Medically significant conditions were defined as (serious) adverse events unrelated to common diseases (including upper respiratory infections, sinusitis, pharyngitis, gastroenteritis, urinary tract infections, cervicovaginal yeast infections, menstrual cycle abnormalities, and injury), or unrelated to routine physician visits.
Blood samples
In Months 0 and 7, blood samples were collected from all subjects to determine HPV antibody response and evaluate biochemical and hematologic parameters, respectively.
Analysis of immunogenicity
The immunogenicity against HPV-16 and -18 was an exploratory endpoint of the trial and was primarily analyzed on the according-to-protocol cohort. Antibodies to HPV-16 and -18 VLPs were quantified at the National Institute for Food and Drug Control by direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay[12].
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were applied to analyze safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity data, with 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated when appropriate.
Results
A total of 30 females, aged 15 to 45 years with a median age of 29.5 years, were enrolled in the study. All participants were of Chinese heritage, residing in China and all received the HPV vaccine. One subject withdrew during the study period (between December 2007 and July 2008) due to a serious adverse event and 29 subjects completed the study.
Safety and reactogenicity
For the 30 subjects who underwent at least one vaccination, 26 (86.7%) reported solicited local symptoms and 13 (43.3%) reported solicited systemic symptoms within 7 days after vaccination. Pain at injection site (65.2% of doses) was the most frequently reported solicited local symptom, followed by redness (34.8% of doses) and swelling (20.2% of doses). Grade 3 pain was reported after 4.5% of doses. None of the subjects reported grade 3 redness or swelling (above 50 mm diameter) (Table 1). Fatigue (19.1% of doses) was the most commonly reported solicited systemic symptom, followed by headache (13.5% of doses) and myalgia (11.2% of doses). Incidences of grade 3 solicited systemic symptoms were low and did not exceed 2.2% of doses for individual symptoms (Table 2). As per protocol, all solicited local symptoms were considered as causally related to vaccination while the incidences of vaccine-related solicited general symptoms were low (after 16.9%, 12.4%, 11.2%, 4.5%, and 4.5% of doses for fatigue, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, and gastrointestinal symptoms, respectively). No subjects reported urticaria/rash within 30 min after vaccination.
Table 1. Solicited local symptoms reported by the 30 females within 7 days after vaccination with human papillomarvirus-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine.
Symptom | Type | HPV vaccination |
Overall/subject |
Overall/dose |
||||||||
Dose 1 |
Dose 2 |
Dose 3 |
||||||||||
n* | % (95% CI) | n* | % (95% CI) | n† | % (95% CI) | n* | % (95% CI) | n‡ | % (95% CI) | |||
Pain | All | 26 | 86.7 (69.3–96.2) | 19 | 63.3 (43.9–80.1) | 13 | 44.8 (26.4–64.3) | 26 | 86.7 (69.3–96.2) | 58 | 65.2 (54.3–75.0) | |
Grade 3 | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 2 | 6.7 (0.8–22.1) | 1 | 3.4 (0.1–17.8) | 4 | 13.3 (3.8–30.7) | 4 | 4.5 (1.2–11.1) | ||
Redness | All | 12 | 40.0 (22.7–59.4 | 9 | 30.0 (14.7–49.4) | 10 | 34.5 (17.9–54.3) | 16 | 53.3 (34.3–71.7) | 31 | 34.8 (25.0–45.7) | |
Swelling | All | 5 | 16.7 (5.6–34.7) | 6 | 20.0 (7.7–38.6) | 7 | 24.1 (10.3–43.5) | 9 | 30.0 (14.7–49.4) | 18 | 20.2 (12.4–30.1) |
CI = confidence interval; n/% = number/percentage of doses followed by at least one symptom.
* Number of subjects with at least one documented dose was 30. † Number of subjects with at least one documented dose was 29, as one subject withdrawn after the second visit due to a serious adverse event. ‡ Number of documented doses was 89. Symptom severity was graded on a scale of 0-3; grade 3 solicited symptoms were defined as any symptom that prevented normal daily activities, redness or swelling >50 mm in diameter, fever >39°C, or urticaria that distributed on at least four areas. No grade 3 redness and swelling were reported.
Table 2. Solicited systemic symptoms reported by the 30 females within 7 days after during the 7-day post-vaccination with human papillomavirus-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine.
Symptom | Type | HPV vaccination |
Overall/subject |
Overall/dose |
|||||||
Dose 1 |
Dose 2 |
Dose 3 |
|||||||||
n* | % (95% CI) | n* | % (95% CI) | n† | % (95% CI) | n* | % (95% CI) | n‡ | % (95% CI) | ||
Arthralgia | All | 2 | 6.7 (0.8–22.1) | 2 | 6.7 (0.8–22.1) | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–11.9) | 2 | 6.7 (0.8–22.1) | 4 | 4.5 (1.2–11.1) |
Grade 3 | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–11.6) | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–11.9) | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 1 | 1.1 (0.0–6.1) | |
Fatigue | All | 6 | 20.0 (7.7–38.6) | 7 | 23.3 (9.9–42.3) | 4 | 13.8 (3.9–31.7) | 10 | 33.3 (17.3–52.8) | 17 | 19.1 (11.5–28.8) |
Fever | All | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–11.9) | 2 | 6.7(0.8–22.1) | 2 | 2.2 (0.3–7.9) |
Gastro-intestinal | All | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 3 | 10.0 (2.1–26.5) | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–11.9) | 4 | 13.3 (3.8–30.7) | 4 | 4.5 (1.2–11.1) |
Headache | All | 6 | 20.0 (7.7–38.6) | 4 | 13.3 (3.8–30.7) | 2 | 6.9 (0.8–22.8) | 8 | 26.7 (12.3–45.9) | 12 | 13.5 (7.2–22.4) |
Grade 3 | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–11.6) | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–11.9) | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 1 | 1.1 (0.0–6.1) | |
Myalgia | All | 5 | 16.7 (5.6–34.7) | 3 | 10.0 (2.1–26.5) | 2 | 6.9 (0.8–22.8) | 7 | 23.3 (9.9–42.3) | 10 | 11.2 (5.5–19.7) |
Grade 3 | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–11.9) | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 2 | 2.2 (0.3–7.9) | |
Rash | All | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–11.6) | 0 | 0.0 (0.0–11.6) | 1 | 3.4 (0.1–17.8) | 1 | 3.3 (0.1–17.2) | 1 | 1.1 (0.0–6.1) |
Footnotes as in Table 1. No cases of grade 3 fatigue, fever, gastrointestinal reaction, and rash and no cases of urticaria were reported.
Within 30 days after vaccination, 4 unsolicited adverse events (aphthous stomatitis, chest discomfort, injection site hematoma, and upper respiratory tract infection) were reported by 4 subjects. The injection site hematoma was assessed as causally related to the vaccination. Two medically significant adverse events including one serious adverse event (as classified by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) were reported during the entire study period: chest discomfort in one subject who required a physician visit; left breast cancer in another subject who required hospitalization and withdrew from the study. Both adverse events were assessed as unrelated to vaccination.
No clinically relevant differences were observed in biochemical and hematologic parameters assessed in subjects between Month 0 and Month 7.
Immunogenicity
Of the 29 subjects who completed the study, 24 were negative for both anti HPV-16 and -18 antibodies at baseline, 4 were negative for anti HPV-16 but positive for anti HPV-18, 1 was positive for anti HPV-16 and negative for anti HPV-18. Pre-vaccination geometric mean titers were 4.1 ELISA units per millilitre (EU/mL) (95% CI, 3.9 to 4.4 EU/mL) for anti HPV-16 and 4.4 EU/mL (95% CI, 3.4 to 5.5 EU/mL) for anti HPV-18. In Month 7, 100% seroconversion and seropositivity were observed for both anti HPV-16 and -18. Geometric mean titers for initially seronegative subjects were 6230.5 EU/mL (95% CI, 4755.1 to 8163.7 EU/mL) for anti-HPV-16 and 2411.1 EU/mL (95% CI, 1734.0 to 3352.7 EU/mL) for anti-HPV-18.
Discussion
The present phase I trial is the first HPV vaccine clinical trial ever conducted in mainland China in preparation for larger safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy studies, in line with local criteria for vaccine licensure by the State Food and Drug Administration. The HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine was generally well tolerated in the participants; injection site reactions (pain, redness, and swelling) were the most frequently reported vaccine-related adverse events. We recognize that this was an open study conducted at a single center and that the sample size was small. However, findings are consistent with the results of an integrated safety analysis of 11 phase II/III trials in a multi-ethnic (including women of Chinese origin) and geographically diverse cohort of approximately 30 000 females aged 10 to 72 years, including over 16 000 who received at least one dose of this HPV vaccine[10].
The present study also found 100% seropositivity for anti-HPV-16 and -18 in all subjects who completed the study. Additionally, antibody levels observed were in the same range as levels found in a previous trial in a larger cohort in Hong Kong[15] and in other populations[16],[17], thus indicating a lack of ethnic difference in antibody responses to this vaccine. In a long-term follow-up study, at up to 7.3 years after first vaccination with the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine, 100% of women remained seropositive with sustained levels of anti HPV-16 ≥13-fold and anti HPV-18 ≥11-fold higher respectively than those associated with natural infection[14]. This long-term seropositivity, combined with the documented impact of HPV-16/18 vaccination on the reduction of virological and histological outcomes associated with HPV-16/18 infection[13],[18], and data showing substantial cross-protection against several non-vaccine oncogenic HPV types[13], suggest that the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine has the potential to (possibly considerably) reduce the burden of cervical cancer worldwide.
Approximately 83% of worldwide cases of cervical cancer occur in developing countries, where, due to infrastructure systems, both the cost-effectiveness and the feasibility of screening strategies have been under significant debate[1]. In China, 30% of women aged 25 to 64 years have never had a pelvic examination and only 23% have had an effective screening coverage, in line with the difficulties in implementing screening programs in a country with a large rural population. In such settings, vaccination has been considered to have the potential to save many lives[19] and prophylactic vaccination of younger women may provide significant advantages over screening as it has fewer logistical requirements[9].
In conclusion, results of the present indicate that the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine appears to be well tolerated and immunogenic in Chinese females aged 15 to 45 years. Based on these favorable results, a large (6000 subjects) double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III trial (NCT00779766) is currently ongoing in China to further evaluate the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of this vaccine.
Acknowledgments
This study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithkline Biologicals. Editorial support for developing the manuscript was provided by Moh Tadayyon, MediTechmedia, UK, and by Julie Taylor, Peak Biomedical Ltd, and was funded by GlaxoSmithkline. Editorial assistance for manuscript coordination was provided by Denis Sohy (Business & Decision) and Jean-Michel Heine (Keyrus Biopharma) on behalf of GlaxoSmithkline Biologicals, Wavre, Belgium.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare that Drs Feng-Cai Zhu, Chang-Gui Li, Hong-Xing Pan, and Yi-Ju Zhang have received research grants for the study from GlaxoSmithkline Biologicals; Dan Bi, Sanjoy Datta, and Hai-Wen Tang are employees of GlaxoSmithkline Biologicals and have been awarded share options.
* Cervarix® is a registered trademark of the GlaxoSmithkline group of companies.
† Gardasil® is a registered trademark of Merck & Co., Inc.
References
- 1.Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002 [J] CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):74–108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide [J] J Pathol. 1999;189(1):12–19. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bao YP, Li N, Wang H, et al. Study on the distribution of human papillomavirus types in cervix among Chinese women: a meta-analysis [J] Chin J Epidemiol. 2007;28(10):941–946. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen W, Zhang X, Molijn A, et al. Human papillomavirus type-distribution in cervical cancer in China: the importance of HPV 16 and 18 [J] Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(9):1705–1713. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9422-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Villiers EM, Fauquet C, Broker TR, et al. Classification of papillomaviruses [J] Virology. 2004;324(1):17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Muñoz N, Bosch FX, Castellsagué X, et al. Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? The international perspective [J] Int J Cancer. 2004;111(2):278–285. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cai HB, Ding XH, Zhou YF, et al. Risk factors for cervical cancer in China: a case-control study [J] Eur J Gynaec Oncol. 2008;29(1):72–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.[No authors listed] Women's health in rural China [J] Lancet. 2009;374(9687):358. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61394-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gakidou E, Nordhagen S, Obermeyer Z. Coverage of cervical cancer screening in 57 countries: low average levels and large inequalities [J] PLoS Med. 2008;5(6):e132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Descamps D, Hardt K, Spiessens B, et al. Safety of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine for cervical cancer prevention: a pooled analysis of 11 clinical trials [J] Hum Vaccin. 2009;5(5):332–340. doi: 10.4161/hv.5.5.7211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Giannini SL, Hanon E, Moris P, et al. Enhanced humoral and memory B cellular immunity using HPV16/18 L1 VLP vaccine formulated with the MPL/aluminium salt combination (AS04) compared to aluminium salt only [J] Vaccine. 2006;24(33–34):5937–5949. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Einstein MH, Baron M, Levin MJ, et al. Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of Cervarix™ and Gardasil® human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical cancer vaccines in healthy women aged 18–45 years [J] Hum Vaccin. 2009;5(10):705–719. doi: 10.4161/hv.5.10.9518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Paavonen J, Naud P, Salmeron J, et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women [J] Lancet. 2009;374(9686):301–314. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61248-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.De Carvalho N, Teixeira J, Roteli-Martins CM, et al. Sustained efficacy and immunogenicity of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine up to 7.3 years in young adult women [J] Vaccine. 2010;28(38):6247–6255. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ngan H YS, Cheung AN, Tarn KF, et al. Human papillomavirus-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted cervical cancer vaccine: immunogenicity and safety in healthy Chinese women from Hong Kong [J] Hong Kong Med J. 2010;16(3):171–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler C, et al. Efficacy of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine in prevention of infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: a randomised controlled trial [J] Lancet. 2004;364(9447):1757–1765. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17398-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schwarz TF, Spaczynski M, Schneider A, et al. Immunogenicity and tolerability of an HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted prophylactic cervical cancer vaccine in women aged 15-55 years [J] Vaccine. 2009;27(4):581–587. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Harper D, Gall S, Naud P, et al. Sustained immunogenicity and high efficacy against HPV-16/18 related cervical neoplasia: long-term follow up through 6.4 years in women vaccinated with Cervarix™ (GSK's HPV 16/18 AS04 candidate vaccine) [C]. Tampa, Florida. 39th Society of Gynecologic Oncologists Meeting; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Agosti JM, Goldie SJ. Introducing HPV vaccine in developing countries—Key challenges and issues [J] N Engl J Med. 2007;356(19):1908–1910. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]