Abstract
Cougars (Puma concolor) are one of only two large cats in North America to have survived the Late Pleistocene extinction (LPE), yet the specific key(s) to their relative success remains unknown. Here, we compare the dental microwear textures of Pleistocene cougars with sympatric felids from the La Brea Tar Pits in southern California that went extinct at the LPE (Panthera atrox and Smilodon fatalis), to clarify potential dietary factors that led to the cougar's persistence through the LPE. We further assess whether the physical properties of food consumed have changed over time when compared with modern cougars in southern California. Using dental microwear texture analysis (DMTA), which quantifies surface features in three dimensions, we find that modern and Pleistocene cougars are not significantly different from modern African lions in any DMTA attributes, suggesting moderate durophagy (i.e. bone processing). Pleistocene cougars from La Brea have significantly greater complexity and textural fill volume than Panthera atrox (inferred to have primarily consumed flesh from fresh kills) and significantly greater variance in complexity values than S. fatalis. Ultimately, these results suggest that cougars already used or adopted a more generalized dietary strategy during the Pleistocene that may have been key to their subsequent success.
Keywords: cougar, Puma concolor, dietary niche, durophagy, Pleistocene, carnivora
1. Introduction
Currently, cougars maintain the largest latitudinal range of any extant terrestrial mammal (aside from humans) in the Western Hemisphere [1]. Their broad geographical distributions are accompanied by highly generalized diets, dominated by the consumption of ungulates in temperate regions [2,3] to small- and medium-sized prey in the tropics [2,4]. Additionally, cougars are known to vary prey sources in response to the presence of sympatric competitively sized carnivores, including wolves [5,6] and jaguars [7]. While much is known about modern cougar diets, often in an effort to ensure their survival in the face of anthropogenic influences, little is known about cougar palaeoecology during the Pleistocene. As cougars are one of only two large cats, along with jaguars, to remain in North America after the Late Pleistocene extinction (LPE) [8], further study of their palaeoecology is necessary to clarifying how they survived.
The La Brea Tar Pits in southern California (USA) contains a high abundance of fossil carnivorans during the Pleistocene, largely because it was a tar seep that attracted numerous carnivores once herbivorous prey became immobilized (much like flies on fly paper) [9]. Despite this rich fossil record, cougars are much less abundant than other sympatric carnivorans at La Brea, especially carnivores inferred to have been social hunters (i.e. the sabre-toothed cat, Smilodon fatalis [9,10], and the dire wolf, Canis dirus [9]). While less information is available on the dietary ecology of Pleistocene cougars, dental microwear texture analysis (DMTA) can elucidate the textural properties of consumed food, including durophagy in extinct and extant carnivorans [11,12].
Here, we compare dental microwear attributes of Pleistocene cougar specimens from the La Brea Tar Pits to sympatric felids that went extinct at the LPE, including S. fatalis and the American lion Panthera atrox. Additionally, we test the hypothesis that the diets of modern cougars are distinct from Pleistocene cougars—potentially in response to competitive release after the LPE.
2. Material and methods
Extant cougar (Puma concolor) specimens were examined from both southern California (Puma concolor cougar, n = 17; Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History) and from Florida (Puma concolor coryi, n = 21; Florida Museum of Natural History, some noted in reference [13]). These specimens were compared with the following extant species: Acinonyx jubatus (cheetah, n = 9), Panthera leo (African lion, n = 15) and Crocuta crocuta (spotted hyaena, n = 12) from reference [12]. Fossil cougar specimens (Puma concolor, n = 12) from the La Brea Tar Pits in southern California (Los Angeles Museum of Natural History, Page Museum, Hancock Collection) were examined and compared with published [12] DMTA data of extinct S. fatalis (n = 15, sabre-toothed cat) and Panthera atrox (n = 15, American lion).
The enamel region of the lower carnassial shearing facet of the m1 trigonid ([11,12]) was examined on all specimens. The entire shearing facet was cleaned with acetone, moulded with polyvinylsiloxane dental impression material, and tooth replicas were prepared using Epotek 301 epoxy resin and hardener. Dental microwear texture analysis was performed on all replicas that preserved antemortem microwear using white-light confocal profilometry and scale-sensitive fractal analysis (SSFA) [14,15]. All specimens were scanned in three dimensions in four adjacent fields of view, for a total sampled area of 204 × 276 µm2. All scans were analysed using SSFA software (ToothFrax and SFrax, Surfract Corp., www.surfrait.com) to characterize tooth surfaces according to the following variables: (i) complexity (Asfc), which distinguishes taxa that consume brittle foods from taxa that consume softer and/or tougher ones, assesses the change in surface roughness across changing scales of observation; (ii) anisotropy (epLsar), the degree to which features share similar orientations, such as a dominance of parallel striations (as can be formed by carnassial action in meat slicing given constraints of tooth-on-tooth movement during occlusion) yielding more anisotropic surfaces and (iii) textural fill volume (Tfv), a measure of the difference in volume filled by large (10 µm) and small (2 µm) diameter square cuboids (high values indicate many deep features between these sizes) [14,15]. In the case of extant carnivorous taxa, increased complexity, decreased anisotropy and increased textural fill volume are associated with increased durophagy [11] (see the electronic supplementary material, Methods for a more detailed discussion of DMTA).
As the majority of DMTA variables are typically not normally distributed (Shapiro–Wilk tests, table 1 and [12]), we used non-parametric statistical tests (Kruskal–Wallis) to compare differences between cougars, both spatially and temporally. We used Dunn's procedure to conduct multiple comparisons (either between taxa or between like taxa across time) absent of the Bonferroni correction (see [12] for a discussion regarding the exclusion of the Bonferroni correction), and Mann–Whitney tests to compare between two taxa or the same species through time. Levene's test (medians), also known as the Brown–Forsythe test, was used to compare variance been extinct and extant taxa.
Table 1.
Descriptive statistics for each DMTA variable by species and/or subspecies. n, number of individuals sampled; Asfc, area-scale fractal complexity; epLsar, anisotropy; Tfv, textural fill volume.
| taxon | statistics | n | Asfc | epLsar | Tfv |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Puma concolor (fossil, La Brea Tar Pits) |
mean | 12 | 4.592 | 0.0035 | 12 860 |
| median | 3.222 | 0.0027 | 14 008 | ||
| standard deviation | 4.530 | 0.0021 | 3609 | ||
| skewness (Fisher) | 1.814 | 0.870 | −1.989 | ||
| p for normality (Shapiro–Wilk) | 0.009 | 0.028 | 0.007 | ||
|
Puma concolor cougar (modern, California) |
mean | 17 | 4.113 | 0.0045 | 9554 |
| median | 4.485 | 0.0051 | 10 454 | ||
| standard deviation | 2.233 | 0.0016 | 4727 | ||
| skewness (Fisher) | 0.638 | −0.206 | −0.459 | ||
| p for normality (Shapiro–Wilk) | 0.299 | 0.229 | 0.684 | ||
|
Puma concolor coryi (modern, Florida) |
mean | 21 | 4.063 | 0.0027 | 8614 |
| median | 3.871 | 0.0027 | 9409 | ||
| standard deviation | 1.702 | 0.0015 | 4561 | ||
| skewness (Fisher) | 0.715 | 0.339 | 0.047 | ||
| p for normality (Shapiro–Wilk) | 0.305 | 0.400 | 0.530 | ||
|
Puma concolor (modern, combined CA and FL) |
mean | 38 | 4.086 | 0.0035 | 9035 |
| median | 4.039 | 0.0034 | 9849 | ||
| standard deviation | 1.929 | 0.0017 | 4597 | ||
| skewness (Fisher) | 0.663 | 0.150 | −0.168 | ||
| p for normality (Shapiro–Wilk) | 0.273 | 0.248 | 0.278 |
3. Results
Results are presented in table 1 and illustrated in figures 1 and 2 (all primary data are included in the electronic supplementary material, table S1). Detailed descriptive statistics and comparisons between A. jubatus, Panthera leo and C. crocuta are noted in reference [12] and not included here. All modern feliforms examined, as well as fossil Puma concolor specimens, have median complexities significantly greater than that of A. jubatus (1.767; table 1), indicating the consumption of more brittle food items in all taxa except A. jubatus. Modern and fossil Puma concolor complexity values are most similar to Panthera leo (4.690), which is known to engage in more generalized dietary behaviour including moderate durophagy [11], and have significantly lower complexity than the predominant scavenger C. crocuta (7.070; figure 2a and the electronic supplementary material, table S2). Anisotropy of fossil and modern Puma concolor specimens is significantly lower than the primarily flesh consuming A. jubatus (0.0027, 0.0034 and 0.0047, respectively; figure 2a and the electronic supplementary material, table S2) and indistinguishable from Panthera leo and C. crocuta (with median values of 0.0033 and 0.0034, respectively). Median textural fill volume is lowest in A. jubatus (2581), followed by modern Puma concolor (9849), Panthera leo (11 358), fossil Puma concolor specimens (14 008) and C. crocuta (14 142).
Figure 1.

Three-dimensional photosimulations of microwear surfaces of modern and fossil cougars analysed, demonstrating similar textural attributes. Examples include (a) Puma concolor cougar (SBMNH 886, modern specimen from southern California, USA), (b) Puma concolor coryi (FLMNH 27148, modern specimen from southern Florida, USA) and (c) Puma concolor (LACMHC x9466, fossil specimen from the La Brea tar pits).
Figure 2.

(a) Bivariate plot of anisotropy (epLsar) and complexity (Asfc) of extant cougars and African carnivorans [12] and (b) fossil specimens from the La Brea Tar Pits, with daggers indicating extinct taxa.
Fossil specimens of Puma concolor from the La Brea tar pits are not significantly different from modern southern California Puma concolor cougar specimens in complexity or anisotropy (including both median values and variance). However, fossil specimens from the La Brea Tar Pits have significantly greater textural fill volume (p = 0.034) than modern specimens from similar geographical areas, potentially suggesting that fossil populations processed coarser food items. Fossil specimens of Puma concolor from the La Brea Tar Pits have significantly greater complexity and variance (p = 0.009) than Panthera atrox (figure 2b and the electronic supplementary material, table S3). Puma concolor is indistinguishable from S. fatalis in complexity values; however, it has significantly greater variance (p = 0.016; figure 2b). Puma concolor has significantly greater textural fill volume than Panthera atrox (electronic supplementary material, table S3), but is indistinguishable from S. fatalis. Anisotropy is not significantly different between the three cats examined at La Brea (figure 2b and the electronic supplementary material, table S3).
4. Discussion
Collectively, DMTA data (i.e. intermediate complexity and low anisotropy) suggest that Pleistocene and modern cougars engaged in moderate durophagy, similar to extant African lions. Pleistocene cougars from La Brea have more variable complexity than sympatric extinct felids, further suggesting that cougars had more generalized dietary behaviour; specifically, some individuals may have consumed primarily tougher flesh, whereas others engaged in a greater degree of brittle food item processing, including bone. This highly generalized dietary behaviour is consistent with observed dietary behaviour in modern cougars [2]. Specifically, cougars today are both opportunistic predators [2] and scavengers of their own kills from cache sites or abandoned carrion [2,16], more fully consuming carcasses of smaller- to medium-sized prey and/or juveniles [2,17]. Similar dental microwear attributes in modern and Pleistocene cougars suggest that dietary behaviour was likely consistent through time, at least, in southern California. However, as textural fill volume is greater in Pleistocene cougars, it is possible that Pleistocene individuals, on average, consumed food items that left coarser features, suggestive of more durophagous behaviour during the Pleistocene.
None of the extinct carnivorans at La Brea (including the felids, the canid Canis dirus and the short-faced bear Arctodus simus) provide evidence that carnivorans more fully consumed carcasses owing to ‘tough times’ prior to the LPE [12,18], as was suggested by Van Valkenburgh & Hertal [19]. Interestingly, cougars from La Brea demonstrate the highest degree of carcass utilization, which may have provided this surviving large cat with greater resilience to LPE events, in contrast to more specialized felids [12]. While cougars may not have sailed through the LPE without consequences (e.g. severe genetic bottlenecks in North America and/or localized extinctions [20]), these findings suggest that more variable dietary behaviour may have actually been a key to their survival.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the National Science Foundation (EAR1053839) and Vanderbilt University for financial support, the curators and collections managers from the FLMNH, SBMNH and Page Museum (LACMHC) for access to specimens, and P. Ungar for the use of analytical equipment and software at the University of Arkansas.
References
- 1.Sunquist M, Sunquist F. 2002. Wild cats of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Murphy K, Ruth TK. 2009. Diet and prey selection of a perfect predator. In Cougar: ecology and conservation (eds Hornocker M, Negri S.), pp. 118–137. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Donadio E, Novaro AJ, Buskirk SW, Wurstten A, Vitali MS, Monteverde MJ. 2010. Evaluating a potentially strong trophic interaction: pumas and wild camelids in protected areas of Argentina. J. Zool. 280, 33–40. ( 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00638.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Foster RJ, Harmsen BJ, Valdes B, Pomilla C, Doncaster CP. 2010. Food habits of sympatric jaguars and pumas across a gradient of human disturbance. J. Zool. 280, 309–318. ( 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00663.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kortello AD, Hurd TE, Murray DL. 2007. Interactions between cougars (Puma concolor) and gray wolves (Canis lupus) in Banff National Park, Alberta. Ecoscience 14, 214–222. ( 10.2980/1195-6860(2007)14[214:IBCPCA]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bartnick TD, Van Deelen TR, Quigley HB, Craighead D. 2013. Variation in cougar (Puma concolor) predation habits during wolf (Canis lupus) recovery in the southern Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Can. J. Zool. 91, 82–93. ( 10.1139/cjz-2012-0147) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moreno RS, Kays RW, Samudio R., Jr 2006. Competative release in diets of ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and puma (Puma concolor) after jaguar (Panthera onca) decline. J. Mammal 87, 808–816. ( 10.1644/05-MAMM-A-360R2.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kurtén B, Anderson E. 1980. Pleistocene mammals of North America. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stock C, Harris JM. 2001. Rancho La Brea: a record of Pleistocene life in California. Los Angeles, CA: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carbone C, Maddox T, Funston PJ, Mills MGL, Grether G, Van Valkenburgh B. 2009. Parallels between playbacks and Pleistocene tar seeps suggest sociality in an extinct sabretooth cat, Smilodon. Biol. Lett. 5, 81–85. ( 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0526) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schubert BW, Ungar PS, DeSantis LRG. 2010. Carnassial microwear and dietary behaviour in large carnivorans. J. Zool. 280, 257–263. ( 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00656.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.DeSantis LRG, Schubert BW, Scott JR, Ungar PS. 2012. Implications of diet for the extinction of saber-toothed cats and American lions. PLoS ONE 7, e52453 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0052453) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haupt RJ, DeSantis LRG, Green JL, Ungar PS. 2013. Dental microwear textures as a proxy for diet in xenarthrans. J. Mammal 94, 856–866. ( 10.1644/12-MAMM-A-204.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ungar PS, Brown CA, Bergstrom TS, Walker A. 2003. Quantification of dental microwear by tandem scanning confocal microscopy and scale-sensitive fractal analyses. Scanning 25, 185–193. ( 10.1002/sca.4950250405) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Scott RS, Ungar PS, Bergstrom TS, Brown CA, Childs BE, Teaford MF, Walker A. 2006. Dental microwear texture analysis: technical considerations. J. Hum. Evol. 51, 339–349. ( 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bauer JW, Logan KA, Sweanor LL, Boyce WM. 2005. Scavenging behavior in Puma. Southwest Nat. 50, 466–471. ( 10.1894/0038-4909(2005)050[0466:SBIP]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stiner MC, Munro ND, Sanz M. 2012. Carcass damage and digested bone from mountain lions (Felis concolor): implications for carcass persistence on landscapes as a function of prey age. J. Arch. Sci. 39, 896–907. ( 10.1016/j.jas.2011.10.020) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Donohue SL, DeSantis LRG, Schubert BW, Ungar PS. 2013. Was the giant short-faced bear a hyper-scavenger? A new approach to the dietary study of ursids using dental microwear textures. PLoS ONE 8, e77531 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0077531) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Van Valkenburgh B, Hertel F. 1993. Tough times at La Brea: tooth breakage in large carnivores of the Late Pleistocene. Science 261, 456–459. ( 10.1126/science.261.5120.456) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Culver M. 2009. Lessons and insights from evolution, taxonomy, and conservation genetics. In Cougar: ecology and conservation (eds Hornocker M, Negri S.), pp. 27–40. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
