Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2013 Nov 14;2014(1):129–139. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201301063

Synthetic Studies Towards the Core Structure of Nakadomarin A by a Thioamide-Based Strategy

Jai K Chavda [a], Panayiotis A Procopiou [b], Peter N Horton [c], Simon J Coles [c], Michael J Porter *[a]
PMCID: PMC4015372  PMID: 24829538

Abstract

The tricyclic BCD substructure of the marine natural product nakadomarin A has been synthesised. The strategy utilised a key carbon–carbon bond-forming reaction between a furan and an N-acyliminium ion derived from a secondary thiolactam. In addition, a novel three-component coupling reaction between a thioamide, an allylic bromide and an isocyanate, leading to the establishment of two new stereogenic centres, is reported.

Two key steps in a projected total synthesis of nakadomarin A have been realised by using the unique chemistry of thioamides. Formation of the carbocyclic B ring can be effected by nucleophilic attack of a furan on a thiolactam-derived iminium ion, and the key quaternary centre can be established by a novel three-component coupling reaction.

Keywords: Natural products, Alkaloids, Sigmatropic rearrangement, Multicomponent reactions

Introduction

Nakadomarin A (1), a hexacyclic alkaloid of the manzamine family, was isolated in 1997 by Kobayashi et al. from the marine sponge Amphimedon sp., collected off the Kerama Islands in Japan.1a It displays cytotoxicity against L1210 murine lymphoma cells, is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and shows antifungal and antibacterial activity.

The structure of nakadomarin A incorporates a tetracyclic furan-containing core (the ABCD ring system) fused to an eight-membered E ring and bridged by a fifteen-membered F ring. The combination of intriguing structural features and promising biological activity has made the compound a popular target for synthesis. Several total syntheses have been published,2a as have numerous reports on the synthesis of various substructures.39

Our initial retrosynthetic analysis of nakadomarin A is depicted in Scheme 1. Late-stage construction of the E and F rings by ring-closing metathesis would lead back to the tetracyclic substructure 2. We planned to install the piperidine A ring through hydroboration of an alkene such as 3 and subsequent functionalisation. It was anticipated that formation of the cyclopentanoid B ring would be possible through cyclisation of the furan in 4 onto an electrophile derived from the thiolactam portion of the molecule with subsequent reductive removal of the sulfur. Padwa and co-workers have shown that mono-N-substituted thioamides, on treatment with α-bromoacyl chlorides, are transformed through N-acylation and S-alkylation into potent N-acyliminium ion electrophiles, which react intramolecularly with nucleophilic alkenes, indoles and benzenes.10a

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Retrosynthesesis of nakadomarin A (1).

We planned to establish the vicinal stereocentres of compound 4 through thia-Claisen rearrangement of a diene such as 5; reaction on the exo face of the bicyclic system, through the chair conformation shown, should lead to the desired stereoisomer 4. We expected that 5 would be accessible from the pyroglutamate-derived thiolactam 6 and (Z)-allylic bromide 7.11

In this paper, we describe our model studies in two areas of this retrosynthesis: the cyclisation of a thiolactam-derived iminium ion to generate the BCD ring system of nakadomarin, and the development of a thia-Claisen rearrangement strategy to establish the stereogenic centres in a compound related to 4.

Results and Discussion

We first focused on generating the carbocyclic B ring of nakadomarin A in a simple model of the BCD ring system (Scheme 2). N-Benzylpyrrolidin-2-one (8) was alkylated sequentially with iodomethane and 3-(bromomethyl)furan (9), prepared as a solution in diethyl ether,12 to afford lactam 10. Removal of the benzyl group was effected with lithium in liquid ammonia, and thionation with Lawesson's reagent13a then gave thiolactam 11. Treatment of this compound with bromoacetyl chloride10b in toluene at 100 °C led to the desired tetracycle 12 in 53 % yield. The same transformation could be effected in higher yield (73 %) by treatment of thiolactam 11 with methyl bromoacetate in toluene at reflux.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of the BCD ring system (12).

Our next aim was to extend this study through the preparation of a compound with functionalities that would allow the construction of the eight-membered E ring of nakadomarin A. To this end, L-pyroglutaminol14 was protected as its benzylidene N,O-acetal 13 (Scheme 3).15 Attempts to convert 13 into its thiolactam analogue using Lawesson's reagent were unsuccessful, with the only product isolated being the 1,3,5,2-oxathiazaphosphepane 14, in which a P–S unit has been inserted into the benzylic C–O bond. Clivio and co-workers16 previously reported the insertion of Lawesson's reagent into the C–O bond of a dihydrouracil nucleoside and found that the unwanted ArPS2 unit was expelled upon extended heating. In our case, however, further heating of 14 in pyridine led only to recovery of the starting material and so a revised strategy was adopted in which thionation took place at a later stage.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of thiolactam 16.

C-Ethoxycarbonylation of 13 was carried out according to a literature procedure.17a Subsequent alkylation with 3-(bromomethyl)furan (9) afforded 15 as a 5:1 diastereomeric mixture; the major diastereomer depicted was isolated in 41 % yield. Hydrolysis of the benzylidene group of 15 with p-toluenesulfonic acid was followed by acetylation of the resulting alcohol and thionation to give secondary thiolactam 16.

Two α-bromocarbonyl electrophiles 17 and 18, each containing a further carbon chain for elaboration of the E ring, were prepared for reaction with 16 (Scheme 4). Lactone 17 was synthesised by conversion of δ-valerolactone into the corresponding TMS ketene acetal and treatment with bromine, and acyl chloride 18 was synthesised by double deprotonation of hex-5-enoic acid with LDA, bromination with carbon tetrabromide and then conversion of the resulting α-bromo acid into an acid chloride using oxalyl chloride.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Reactions of thiolactam 16.

Initial attempts to effect direct reaction of thiolactam 16 with lactone 17 resulted in recovery of the starting materials, and so the nucleophilicity of 16 was increased through deprotonation. Treatment of 16 with sodium hydride followed by reaction with α-bromo-δ-valerolactone (17) afforded thioimidate 19 as a mixture of diastereoisomers (Scheme 4). On heating in toluene in a sealed tube, no acylation of the nitrogen atom was observed; rather the substrate underwent an Eschenmoser sulfide contraction to give vinylogous carbamate 20 as a single unassigned geometric isomer. Given the lack of base or thiophile in the reaction medium, the observation of this product is somewhat surprising.

Reaction of thiolactam 16 with the unsaturated α-bromoacyl chloride 18 in toluene gave two major products. The desired product 21 was obtained in 21 % yield as an inconsequential 4:1 mixture of diastereomers. The major product, however, was the diene 22, which was isolated as a single, but unidentified diastereoisomer. This unexpected product may be formed as shown in Scheme 5. Reaction of thiolactam 16 with acid chloride 18 through S-alkylation and N-acylation gives the expected N-acyliminium ion 23, which can either react with the nucleophilic furan to produce the desired product 21, or can undergo enolisation to give the aromatic thiazolium ion 24. If ketonisation then occurs through addition of a proton at the carbon between the nitrogen and sulfur atoms, cation 25 results; this can lose a proton to give the diene 22. All attempts to improve the yield of tetracycle 21 at the expense of the diene product 22, through modification of the reaction conditions, were unsuccessful.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Formation of bicycle 22.

We next investigated the thia-Claisen step of Scheme 1, and initially targeted tertiary thiolactam 26 (Scheme 6). L-Pyroglutaminol was protected as its acetonide 27 by using 2,2-dimethoxypropane and 4-toluenesulfonic acid,18 and this was acylated with diethyl carbonate2g to give 28 as a mixture of diastereomers. Attempts to thionate this compound to give 26 by using either Lawesson's reagent or phosphorus pentasulfide were unsuccessful.

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Attempted synthesis of thiolactam 26.

A reversal of the step order was attempted. Acetonide 27 could be thionated, albeit in low yield, with Lawesson's reagent, whereas the use of other thionating reagents failed; decomposition was observed when 2,4-bis(phenylthio)-1,3-dithia-2,4-diphosphetane-2,4-disulfide (Yokoyama's reagent)19 was employed, and the use of Bergman's P4S10–pyridine complex20 led to recovery of the starting material. A slightly more efficient synthesis of 29 could be achieved by starting from ethyl L-pyroglutamate (30)21 by thionation with Lawesson's reagent in 82 % yield,22 followed by the selective reduction of the ester with lithium borohydride and protection using 2,2-dimethoxypropane. However, we were unable to conduct a successful α-acylation of thiolactam 29.

Having failed in attempts to prepare the desired thia-Claisen substrate 26, we instead conceived a three-component coupling approach that would allow the stereospecific formation of two new C–C bonds at the α position of thiolactam 29 in a single laboratory operation. This strategy is illustrated in Scheme 7.

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

Proposed three-component coupling to give 33.

The reaction of thiolactam 29 with an allylic bromide should give N,S-ketene acetal 31. Such compounds are known to readily undergo substitution reactions with electrophiles such as acid chlorides23 or isocyanates24 at the nucleophilic carbon atom; our hope was that we could intercept the N,S-ketene acetal 31 with such an electrophile to generate 32, which would then undergo the desired [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement to give the product 33. An obvious potential pitfall of this chemistry is that the 1,5-diene moiety of 31 may undergo the sigmatropic rearrangement more rapidly than it reacts with the electrophile; if this were the case, the simple thia-Claisen product 34 would be obtained.

Initial studies on the three-component coupling reaction were carried out by using (E)-cinnamyl bromide as the allylic bromide component. Deprotonation of 29 with either n-butyllithium or lithium hexamethyldisilazide (LHMDS) at low temperature was followed by treatment with (E)-cinnamyl bromide. Once alkylation of the sulfur was complete, as judged by TLC, the second electrophile was added and the reaction mixture warmed to room temperature (Scheme 8).

Scheme 8.

Scheme 8

Attempted three-component coupling reaction using (E)-cinnamyl bromide.

A wide range of electrophiles were tested: ethyl chloroformate, acetic formic anhydride, phenyl isocyanate, chlorosulfonyl isocyanate, trichloroacetyl isocyanate and phosgene. However, under none of the conditions tried could any of the putative three-component coupling products 35 be obtained; rather, the only compound isolated was the product 36 from rearrangement of the first-formed N,S-ketene acetal. This clearly indicated that the rate of acylation of the N,S-ketene acetal was not competitive with the rate of sigmatropic rearrangement.

A control experiment carried out in the absence of the second electrophile showed that the [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement to form 36 was indeed rapid, proceeding in less than 5 min at room temperature. Under these conditions, 36 could be isolated in 73 % yield as a 25:1 mixture of diastereoisomers. The stereochemistry of the major isomer was confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Figure 1).25,26

Figure 1.

Figure 1

X-ray crystal structure of 36.

Rawal and co-workers previously reported that N,S-ketene acetals derived from (Z)-allylic bromides rearrange much more slowly than those derived from the corresponding E isomers (3 h at reflux in THF vs. warming from –78 °C to room temperature).27 In light of this observation, and given the requirement for a (Z)-allylic bromide in the projected total synthesis (Scheme 1), we next investigated the use of (Z)-cinnamyl bromide.

Fortunately, deprotonation of thiolactam 29 at 0 °C followed by reaction with (Z)-cinnamyl bromide and then phenyl isocyanate afforded the desired three-component coupling product 37 in 46 % yield (Scheme 9).

Scheme 9.

Scheme 9

Three-component coupling reaction using (Z)-cinnamyl bromide.

Further investigations into this three-component coupling reaction and its application to the total synthesis of nakadomarin A are ongoing.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated the feasibility of two key steps in a projected total synthesis of nakadomarin A. First, we have shown that the carbocyclic B ring in a tricyclic ABC substructure can be constructed by electrophilic substitution of a furan by using a thiolactam-derived acyliminium electrophile. Secondly, we have developed a novel three-component coupling reaction involving a thioamide, allylic bromide and isocyanate to stereoselectively install two vicinal stereogenic centres, one of them quaternary.

Experimental Section

General: (Bromomethyl)furan (9),12 lactam 13,15 Lawesson's reagent [2,4-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,3,2,4-dithiadiphosphetane 2,4-disulfide]28 and hex-5-enoic acid29 were prepared by literature procedures. All other reagents were used as obtained from commercial sources. Solvents (THF, toluene, dichloromethane) were dried by passage through a column of activated alumina under nitrogen. All reactions in anhydrous solvents were carried out in flame-dried glassware under argon.

1-Benzyl-3-(furan-3-ylmethyl)-3-methylpyrrolidin-2-one (10): A stirred solution of 1-benzylpyrrolidin-2-one (8; 1.80 mL, 11.4 mmol) in THF (33 mL) at –78 °C was treated dropwise with n-butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes, 5.50 mL, 13.7 mmol) and stirred for 30 min. The reaction mixture was treated dropwise with MeI (1.40 mL, 22.8 mmol) and stirred for 30 min. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temp. and stirred for 1.5 h and then quenched with saturated aq. NH4Cl (30 mL). The organic material was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 30 mL) and the combined organic extracts were washed with H2O (30 mL) and brine (30 mL), dried (MgSO4) and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 50 % EtOAc in petroleum ether) gave 1-benzyl-3-methylpyrrolidin-2-one (8a; 1.56 g, 72 %) as a yellow oil. IR (film): Inline graphicmax = 2965, 2930, 2872, 1677 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.24 (d, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 1.59 (dq, 2JH,H = 12.7, 3JH,H = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.21 (dddd, 2JH,H = 12.6, 3JH,H = 8.6, 6.7, 4.1 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.52 (ddt, 3JH,H = 15.8, 8.7, 7.2 Hz, 1 H, 3-H), 3.15–3.19 (m, 2 H, 5-H), 4.43 (d, 2JH,H = 14.7 Hz, 1 H, PhCH2), 4.47 (d, 2JH,H = 14.7 Hz, 1 H, PhCH2), 7.20–7.36 (m, 5 H, Ar-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.6 (CH3), 27.2 (C-4), 36.9 (C-3), 44.8 (C-5), 46.9 (PhCH2), 127.6 (CH), 128.2 (CH), 128.8 (CH), 136.8 (C), 177.5 (C-2) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 189 (63) [M]+, 92. HRMS (EI): calcd. for C12H15NO [M]+ 189.1148; found 189.1152.

A stirred solution of lactam 8a (1.56 g, 8.23 mmol) in THF (28 mL) at –78 °C was treated dropwise with n-butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes, 3.5 mL, 8.6 mmol) and stirred for 40 min. The reaction mixture was treated with a solution of bromide 9 (prepared from 6.43 mmol of furan-3-methanol and PBr3),12 stirred for 30 min, and then warmed to room temp. The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated aq. NH4Cl (20 mL) and the organic material extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with H2O (20 mL) and brine (20 mL), dried (MgSO4) and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 25 % EtOAc in petroleum ether) gave lactam 10 (480 mg, 28 % over two steps from furan-3-methanol) as a colourless oil. IR (CH2Cl2 cast): Inline graphicmax = 2961, 2930, 2871, 1682 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.21 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.68 (ddd, 2JH,H = 12.8, 3JH,H = 8.3, 4.5 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 1.99 (ddd, 2JH,H = 12.8, 3JH,H = 9.0, 6.4 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.50 (d, 2JH,H = 14.1 Hz, 1 H, FurCH2), 2.80 (d, 2JH,H = 14.1 Hz, 1 H, FurCH2), 2.86 (ddd, 2JH,H = 9.6, 3JH,H = 9.0, 4.5 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 3.06 (ddd, 2JH,H = 9.7, 3JH,H = 8.4, 6.4 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 4.36 (d, 2JH,H = 14.7 Hz, 1 H, PhCH2), 4.43 (d, 2JH,H = 14.7 Hz, 1 H, PhCH2), 6.26 (d, 4JH,H = 1.3 Hz, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.11–7.33 (m, 7 H, Ar-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 24.0 (CH3), 30.2 (C-4), 33.2 (Fur-CH2), 43.4 (C-2), 45.1 (C-5), 46.9 (PhCH2), 112.3 (Fur-C-4), 120.7 (Fur-C-3), 127.6 (Ph-C-1), 128.1 (CH), 128.7 (CH), 136.6 (CH), 140.8 (Fur-C-5), 142.7 (Fur-C-2), 178.5 (C-2) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 269 (31) [M]+, 254 (13) [M – CH3]+, 187 (100) [M – CH2Fur]+, 158 (20), 91 (69) [PhCH2]+. HRMS (EI): calcd. for C17H19NO2 [M]+ 269.1410; found 269.1407.

3-(Furan-3-ylmethyl)-3-methylpyrrolidine-2-thione (11): A solution of lactam 10 (373 mg, 1.38 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was added to liquid NH3 (ca. 15 mL) at –78 °C. The stirred solution was treated with Na (65 mg, 2.8 mmol) and stirred for 10 min. The reaction mixture was quenched with satd. aq. NH4Cl (15 mL) and then warmed to room temp. overnight. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the organic material extracted with EtOAc (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with H2O (30 mL) and brine (30 mL), dried (MgSO4) and then concentrated in vacuo to give 3-(furan-3-ylmethyl)-3-methylpyrrolidin-2-one (10a; 234 mg, 95 %) as a pale-yellow oil. IR (CDCl3 cast): Inline graphicmax = 3230, 2964, 2927, 2872, 1692 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.17 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.78 (ddd, 2JH,H = 12.7, 3JH,H = 8.0, 4.5 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.09 (ddd, 2JH,H = 12.7, 3JH,H = 8.6, 6.6 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.48 (d, 2JH,H = 14.2 Hz, 1 H, FurCH2), 2.71 (d, 2JH,H = 14.2 Hz, 1 H, FurCH2), 3.04 (td, 2JH,H = 9.0, 3JH,H = 9.0, 4.5 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 3.22 (br. q, 2JH,H = 3JH,H = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 6.28 (s, 1 H, Fur-H), 6.79 (br. s, 1 H, NH), 7.24 (s, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.32 (s, 1 H, Fur-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 23.5 (CH3), 32.7 (C-4), 32.8 (Fur-CH2), 39.0 (C-3), 44.0 (C-5), 112.2 (Fur-C-4), 120.7 (Fur-C-3), 140.7 (Fur-C-5), 142.8 (Fur-C-2), 182.8 (C-2) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 179 (41) [M]+, 164 (35) [M – CH3]+, 98 (35), 82 (100) [FurCH2]+. HRMS (EI): calcd. for C10H13NO2 [M]+ 179.0941; found 179.0944.

A stirred solution of lactam 10a (234 mg, 1.31 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was treated with Lawesson's reagent (292 mg, 0.721 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated at 60 °C for 2 h and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 25 % EtOAc in petroleum ether) gave thiolactam 11 (204 mg, 80 %) as an orange oil. IR (CH2Cl2 cast): Inline graphicmax = 3166 (br), 2967, 2926, 2888, 1524 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.30 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.95 (ddd, 2JH,H = 12.8, 3JH,H = 8.6, 5.7 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.23 (ddd, 2JH,H = 12.8, 3JH,H = 8.7, 5.8 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.67 (d, 2JH,H = 14.3 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 2.88 (d, 2JH,H = 14.3 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.16 (dddd, 2JH,H = 11.0, 3JH,H = 8.7, 5.7, 1.1 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 3.40 (dddd, 2JH,H = 11.0, 3JH,H = 8.6, 5.9, 1.1 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 6.37 (br. s, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.31 (m, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.33 (t, 3JH,H = 4JH,H = 1.7 Hz, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.67 (br. s, 1 H, NH) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 26.5 (CH3), 33.5 (Fur-CH2), 35.3 (C-4), 45.6 (C-5), 54.1 (C-3), 112.1 (Fur-C-4), 120.4 (Fur-C-3), 140.7 (Fur-C-5), 142.6 (Fur-C-2), 213.0 (C-2) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 195 (100) [M]+, 180 (45) [M – CH3]+, 162 (16), 114 (22), 81 (60) [FurCH2]+. HRMS (EI): calcd. for C10H13NOS [M]+ 195.0712; found 195.0718.

(8RS,14RS)-8-Methyl-3-oxa-14-thia-11-azatetracyclo[6.6.0.01,11.02,6]tetradeca-2(6),4-dien-12-one (12): A stirred solution of thiolactam 11 (21 mg, 0.11 mmol) in toluene (2 mL) was treated with methyl bromoacetate (12 μL, 0.13 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated at 150 °C for 18 h and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 20 % EtOAc in petroleum ether) gave tetracycle 12 (18 mg, 73 %) as a yellow viscous oil. IR (CH2Cl2 thin film): Inline graphicmax = 2960, 2922, 2864, 1683 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.34 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.97 (dt, 2JH,H = 13.0, 3JH,H = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 2.08 (ddd, 2JH,H = 12.8, 3JH,H = 7.9, 4.1 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 2.49 (d, 2JH,H = 15.2 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 2.65 (d, 2JH,H = 15.2 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 2.98 (dtd, 2JH,H = 12.0, 3JH,H = 8.1, 1.1 Hz, 1 H, 10-H), 3.55 (d, 2JH,H = 15.2 Hz, 1 H, 13-H), 3.90 (ddd, 2JH,H = 12.0, 3JH,H = 8.3, 4.1 Hz, 1 H, 10-H), 4.17 (d, 2JH,H = 15.2 Hz, 1 H, 13-H), 6.20 (d, 3JH,H = 1.9 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 7.44 (d, 3JH,H = 1.9 Hz, 1 H, 4-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 25.0 (CH3), 36.5 (C-13), 37.0 (C-7), 41.8 (C-9), 42.7 (C-10), 58.2 (C-8), 80.3 (C-1), 108.4 (C-5), 126.2 (C-6), 148.7 (C-4), 155.6 (C-2), 171.0 (C-12) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 235 (75) [M]+, 220 (43) [M – CH3]+, 175 (48), 162 (72) [M – SCH2CO]+, 146 (100). HRMS (EI): calcd. for C12H13NO2S [M]+ 235.0662; found 235.0664.

(1S)-4-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-6-phenyl-4-thioxo-3-oxa-5-thia-7-aza-4-phosphabicyclo[5.3.0]decane-8-thione (14): A stirred solution of lactam 1315 (207 mg, 1.02 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was treated with Lawesson's reagent (247 mg, 0.611 mmol). The mixture was heated at reflux for 6 h and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 50 % EtOAc in petroleum ether) gave thiolactam 14 (340 mg, 79 %) as a colourless solid, m.p. 138–139 °C; [α]D20 = –74 (c = 1.0, CHCl3). IR (solid): Inline graphicmax = 2924, 2838, 1591 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.02 (m, 1 H, 10-H), 2.40 (m, 1 H, 10-H), 3.12 (ddd, 2JH,H = 18.1, 3JH,H = 8.7, 2.6 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 3.21 (ddd, 2JH,H = 17.3, 3JH,H = 10.5, 7.9 Hz, 1 H, 9-H), 3.89 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 4.04 (ddd, 3JH,P = 28.2, 2JH,H = 12.4, 3JH,H = 5.7 Hz, 1 H, 2-H), 4.94 (m, 1 H, 1-H), 5.09 (ddd, 3JH,P = 15.2, 2JH,H = 12.1, 3JH,H = 6.2 Hz, 1 H, 2-H), 6.99–7.07 (m, 3 H, 6-H, Ar-H), 7.28–7.39 (m, 5 H, Ar-H), 7.93 (dd, 3JH,P = 14.4, 3JH,H = 8.8 Hz, 2 H, Ar-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.0 (C-10), 43.7 (C-9), 55.7 (OCH3), 62.5 (C-1), 64.8 (d, 3JC,P = 4.2 Hz, C-6), 65.6 (d, 3JC,P = 6.6 Hz, C-2), 114.5 (d, 2JC,P = 16.1 Hz, CHCP), 124.7 (d, 1JC,P = 129.9 Hz, CP), 127.3 (CH), 129.11 (CH), 129.15 (CH), 133.5 (d, 3JC,P = 14.3 Hz, CHCHCP), 135.4 (d, 3JC,P = 6.6 Hz, Ph-C-1), 163.6 (d, 4JC,P = 3.6 Hz, MeOC), 203.3 (C-8) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 422 (44) [MH]+, 300 (100) [MH – SCHPh]+. HRMS (CI): calcd. for C20H22NO2PS3 [MH]+ 422.0472; found 422.0474.

Ethyl (2R,5S,7R)-7-(Furan-3-ylmethyl)-8-oxo-2-phenyl-3-oxa-1-azabicyclo[3.3.0]octane-7-carboxylate (epi-15) and Ethyl (2R,5S,7S)-7-(Furan-3-ylmethyl)-8-oxo-2-phenyl-3-oxa-1-azabicyclo[3.3.0]octane-7-carboxylate (15): Compound 13 was acylated following the procedure of Moloney and co-workers.17b A flask containing a stirred solution of lactam 13 (8.7 g, 43 mmol) and diethyl carbonate (21 mL, 170 mmol) in toluene (70 mL) was fitted with a Dean–Stark trap. The solution was heated at reflux for 4.5 h, cooled to 0 °C and then added to a pre-washed NaH (60 % dispersion in mineral oil, 4.12 g, 100 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated at reflux for 14 h and then cooled to 0 °C. It was then treated with AcOH (4.40 g, 73.3 mmol) and stirred for 1 h at room temp. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 30–50 % EtOAc in petroleum ether, gradient elution) gave ethyl (2R,5S,7RS)-8-oxo-2-phenyl-3-oxa-1-azabicyclo[3.3.0]octane-7-carboxylate (13a) as a 13:1 mixture of diastereoisomers (7.3 g, 62 %) as a yellow solid, m.p. 66–67 °C (ref.17b 85–87 °C for a 1:1 ratio of diastereoisomers). IR (solid): Inline graphicmax = 2985, 2917, 2875, 1736, 1687 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, data for major isomer): δ = 1.33 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 2.42 (ddd, 2JH,H = 13.3, 3JH,H = 9.8, 6.2 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 2.57 (ddd, 2JH,H = 13.3, 3JH,H = 9.4, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 3.69 (t, 2JH,H = 3JH,H = 8.2 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 3.87 (t, 3JH,H = 9.6 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 4.13 (tt, 3JH,H = 7.5, 6.5 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 4.20–4.34 (m, 3 H, 4-H, CH2CH3), 6.32 (s, 1 H, 2-H), 7.30–7.48 (m, 5 H, Ar-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3, data for major isomer): δ = 14.3 (CH3), 27.6 (C-6), 51.7 (C-7), 57.0 (C-5), 62.1 (CH2CH3), 72.0 (C-4), 87.2 (C-2), 126.0 (CH), 128.6 (CH), 128.8 (CH), 138.4 (C), 169.3 (C-8), 172.3 (CO2Et) ppm.

NaH (60 % dispersion in oil, 620 mg, 15.3 mmol) was washed with hexanes and then suspended in THF (80 mL) and cooled to 0 °C. The suspension was treated with lactam 13a (13:1 mixture of diastereoisomers, 3.52 g, 12.8 mmol) in THF (20 mL), then warmed to room temp. and stirred for 30 min. The reaction mixture was treated with a solution of bromide 9 (prepared from 16.8 mmol of furan-3-methanol and PBr3)12 and stirred for 21 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated aq. NH4Cl (120 mL) and the organic material extracted with EtOAc (3 × 75 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with water (50 mL) and brine (50 mL), dried (MgSO4) and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 20 % Et2O in petroleum ether) gave lactam epi-15 (312 mg, 7 %) as a colourless solid, m.p. 50–52 °C; [α]D20 = +165 (c 0.99, CHCl3). IR (CHCl3): Inline graphicmax = 2981, 2938, 2876, 1736, 1708 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.27 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 1.87 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.2, 3JH,H = 6.8 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 2.78 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.2, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 3.09 (d, 2JH,H = 14.8 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.14 (d, 2JH,H = 14.8 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.18 (t, 2JH,H = 3JH,H = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.14 (dd, 2JH,H = 8.0, 3JH,H = 6.3 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.17–4.28 (m, 3 H, 4-H, CH2CH3), 6.25–6.28 (m, 2 H, 2-H, Fur-H), 7.27–7.43 (m, 7 H, Ar-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.2 (CH3), 29.2 (Fur-CH2), 33.8 (C-6), 56.3 (C-5), 61.6 (C-7), 62.2 (CH2CH3), 72.1 (C-4), 87.0 (C-2), 111.9 (Fur-C-4), 119.6 (Fur-C-3), 126.1 (CH), 128.6 (CH), 128.8 (CH), 138.1 (C), 141.2 (Fur-C-5), 143.3 (Fur-C-2), 170.7 (C-10), 173.0 (CO2Et) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 356 (100) [MH]+. HRMS (CI): calcd. for C20H22NO5 [MH]+ 356.1498; found 356.1504.

Further elution (20 % Et2O in petroleum ether) afforded lactam 15 (1.86 g, 41 %, major isomer) as a colourless oil. [α]D20 = +59 (c 0.81, CHCl3). IR (CHCl3): Inline graphicmax = 2981, 2939, 2878, 1740, 1704 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.32 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 2.32 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.9, 3JH,H = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, C6-H), 2.50 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.9, 3JH,H = 4.9 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 3.07 (d, 2JH,H = 14.6 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.12 (d, 2JH,H = 14.6 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.62 (dd, 3JH,H = 8.7, 2JH,H = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 3.74 (tdd, 3JH,H = 8.5, 6.1, 4.6 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 4.19 (dd, 2JH,H = 7.7, 3JH,H = 6.2 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.22–4.32 (m, 2 H, CH2CH3), 6.23 (t, 3JH,H = 4JH,H = 1.3 Hz, 1 H, Fur-H), 6.29 (s, 1 H, 2-H), 7.27–7.38 (m, 7 H, Ar-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.2 (CH3), 29.8 (Fur-CH2), 31.1 (C-6), 56.3 (C-5), 60.7 (C-7), 62.2 (CH2CH3), 71.7 (C-4), 87.3 (C-2), 112.0 (Fur-C-4), 119.2 (Fur-C-3), 126.0 (CH), 128.5 (CH), 128.8 (CH), 138.4 (C), 141.2 (Fur-C-5), 143.1 (Fur-C-2), 171.2 (C-10), 174.9 (CO2Et) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 356 (100) [MH]+. HRMS (CI): calcd. for C20H22NO5 [MH]+ 356.1498; found 356.1507.

Ethyl (3R,5S)-5-Acetoxymethyl-3-(furan-3-ylmethyl)-2-thioxopyrrolidine-3-carboxylate (16): A stirred solution of lactam 15 (557 mg, 1.57 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (42 mL) was treated with p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (298 mg, 1.57 mmol) and stirred for 105 min. The reaction mixture was passed through a short pad of silica gel, eluting with EtOAc to give ethyl (3R,5S)-3-(furan-3-ylmethyl)-5-hydroxymethyl-2-oxopyrrolidine-3-carboxylate (15a, 371 mg, 87 %) as a colourless solid, m.p. 82–83 °C; [α]D20 = +6.5 (c = 0.31, CHCl3). IR (solid): Inline graphicmax = 3227 (br), 2930, 1721, 1676 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.29 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 2.24 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.8, 3JH,H = 8.7 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.29 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.8, 3JH,H = 5.2 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.43 (br. t, 3JH,H = 5.5 Hz, 1 H, OH), 3.02 (d, 2JH,H = 14.4 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.08 (d, 2JH,H = 14.4 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.40 (br. m, 1 H, C-5), 3.52 (ddd, 2JH,H = 11.1, 3JH,H = 7.0, 6.0 Hz, 1 H, CH2OH), 3.64 (ddd, 2JH,H = 10.9, 3JH,H = 5.3, 3.8 Hz, 1 H, CH2OH), 4.19–4.27 (m, 2 H, CH2CH3), 6.30 (d, 3JH,H = 1.3 Hz, 1 H, Fur-H), 6.49 (br. s, 1 H, NH), 7.30 (s, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.35 (t, 3JH,H = 4JH,H = 1.6 Hz, 1 H, Fur-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.2 (CH3), 29.6 (Fur-CH2), 31.3 (C-4), 53.1 (C-5), 55.9 (C-3), 62.2 (CH2CH3), 66.0 (CH2OH), 111.9 (Fur-C-4), 119.2 (Fur-C-3), 141.2 (Fur-C-5), 143.3 (Fur-C-2), 172.1 (C-2), 175.2 (CO2Et) ppm. MS (ES+): m/z (%) = 290 (100) [MNa]+, 222 (50) [MNa – C4H3O]+. HRMS (ES+): calcd. for C13H17NO5Na [MNa]+ 290.1004; found 290.1012.

A stirred solution of lactam 15a (269 mg, 1.01 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was treated with Ac2O (105 μL, 1.1 mmol) and DMAP (24 mg, 0.2 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 80 min and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 30–50 % EtOAc in petroleum ether) gave ethyl (3R,5S)-5-acetoxymethyl-3-(furan-3-ylmethyl)-2-oxopyrrolidine-3-carboxylate (15b, 298 mg, 96 %) as a colourless oil. [α]D20 = –3.0 (c = 1.0, CHCl3). IR (film): Inline graphicmax = 3114 (br), 2940, 2912, 2907, 1734, 1697 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.30 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH3), 2.06 (s, 3 H, CH3CO), 2.28 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.9, 3JH,H = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.32 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.9, 3JH,H = 5.5 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 3.02 (d, 2JH,H = 14.5 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.09 (d, 2JH,H = 14.5 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.47 (m, 1 H, 5-H), 3.93 (dd, 2JH,H = 11.2, 3JH,H = 8.5 Hz, 1 H, AcOCH2), 4.16 (dd, 2JH,H = 11.2, 3JH,H = 4.0 Hz, 1 H, AcOCH2), 4.24 (q, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 2 H, CH2CH3), 6.06 (br. s, 1 H, NH), 6.30 (br. s, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.30 (s, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.35 (t, 3JH,H = 4JH,H = 1.7 Hz, 1 H, Fur-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.2 (CH2CH3), 20.9 (CH3CO), 29.5 (Fur-CH2), 31.5 (C-4), 50.0 (C-5), 55.4 (C-3), 62.2 (CH2CH3), 67.3 (AcOCH2), 111.9 (Fur-C-4), 119.1 (Fur-C-3), 141.3 (Fur-C-5), 143.3 (Fur-C-2), 170.7 (CH3C=O), 171.3 (CO2Et), 174.6 (C-2) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 310 (42) [MH]+, 236 (90) [MH – CO2Et]+, 222 (19), 203 (47), 190 (43), 81 (100) [FurCH2]+. HRMS (CI): calcd. for C15H20NO6 [MH]+ 310.1291; found 310.1289.

A stirred solution of lactam 15b (285 mg, 0.92 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was treated with Lawesson's reagent (206 mg, 0.51 mmol) and heated at reflux for 5.5 h. The reaction mixture was treated with further Lawesson's reagent (21 mg, 0.051 mmol) and heated at reflux for 2 h and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 25–50 % Et2O in petroleum ether) gave thiolactam 16 (197 mg, 65 %) as a colourless oil. [α]D20 = –0.8 (c = 1.25, CHCl3). IR (film): Inline graphicmax = 3142 (br), 2982, 2932, 2906, 1733, 1515 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.30 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH3), 2.08 (s, 3 H, CH3CO), 2.35–2.42 (m, 2 H, 4-H), 3.11 (d, 2JH,H = 14.5 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.26 (d, 2JH,H = 14.5 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.64 (m, 1 H, 5-H), 3.98 (dd, 2JH,H = 11.2, 3JH,H = 8.9 Hz, 1 H, AcOCH2), 4.18–4.28 (m, 3 H, CH2CH3, AcOCH2), 6.38 (br. s, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.26 (s, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.34 (s, 1 H, Fur-H), 8.04 (br. s, 1 H, NH) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.1 (CH2CH3), 20.9 (CH3CO), 32.1 (Fur-CH2), 33.2 (C-4), 58.4 (C-5), 62.3 (CH2CH3), 65.2 (C-3), 66.3 (AcOCH2), 112.0 (Fur-C-4), 119.1 (Fur-C-3), 141.4 (Fur-C-5), 143.2 (Fur-C-2), 170.6 (CH3CO), 171.0 (CO2Et), 205.1 (CS) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 325 (48) [M]+, 252 (100) [M – CO2Et]+, 210 (33) [M – CH3CO]+. HRMS (EI): calcd. for C15H19NO5S [M]+ 325.0979; found 325.0973.

3-Bromotetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one (17): A stirred solution of diisopropylamine (1.7 mL, 12 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was cooled to 0 °C and treated dropwise with n-butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes, 4.4 mL, 11 mmol), stirred for 15 min and then cooled to –78 °C. The solution was treated with δ-valerolactone (0.93 mL, 10 mmol) in THF (1 mL) and stirred for 15 min. The reaction mixture was treated with chlorotrimethylsilane (1.7 mL, 13 mmol), stirred for 1 h and then warmed to room temp. The mixture was concentrated in vacuo and diluted with pentane (10 mL), filtered and then concentrated in vacuo once more. Purification by distillation (31–32 °C, 4 Torr) gave 6-trimethylsilyloxy-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran30 (17a; 1.32 g, 77 %) as a colourless oil. IR (CDCl3 cast): Inline graphicmax = 2956, 2899, 2878 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.21 [s, 9 H, Si(CH3)3], 1.74 (m, 2 H, 3-H), 2.03 (td, 3JH,H = 6.4, 3.6 Hz, 2 H, 4-H), 3.81 (t, 3JH,H = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 4.04 (br. dd, 3JH,H = 6.0, 4.3 Hz, 2 H, 2-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.1 [Si(CH3)3], 20.0 (C-4), 22.5 (C-3), 67.3 (C-2), 74.1 (C-5), 154.6 (C-6) ppm.

A stirred solution of silyl enol ether 17a (44 mg, 0.26 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was cooled to –15 °C and treated dropwise with Br2 (13 μL, 0.26 mmol). The solution was stirred for 30 min and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 30 % Et2O in petroleum ether) gave lactone 1731 (45 mg, 98 %) as a colourless oil. IR (CDCl3 cast): Inline graphicmax = 2944, 2876, 2861, 1733 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.90 (ddt, 2JH,H = 14.6, 3JH,H = 10.5, 5.2 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 2.25 (tdd, 2JH,H = 14.2, 3JH,H = 9.4, 5.1 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 2.35 (m, 1 H, 4-H), 2.46 (ddt, 2JH,H = 14.8, 3JH,H = 9.5, 5.2 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.40 (ddd, 3JH,H = 11.4, 8.9, 4.5 Hz, 1 H, 3-H), 4.56–4.63 (m, 2 H, 6-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 20.0 (C-5), 30.4 (C-4), 40.8 (C-3), 70.0 (C-6), 166.9 (C-2) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 181/179 (78/81) [MH]+, 101 (100), 99 (100) [MH – HBr]+. HRMS (CI): calcd. for C5H879BrO2 [MH]+ 178.9708; found 178.9702.

2-Bromohex-5-enoyl Chloride (18): A stirred solution of diisopropylamine (1.80 mL, 12.8 mmol) in THF (22 mL) was cooled to 0 °C and then treated dropwise with n-butyllithium (2.5 M in hexanes, 5.10 mL, 12.8 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 45 min, then cooled to –10 °C and treated dropwise with hex-5-enoic acid30 (666 mg, 5.83 mmol) in THF (11 mL) and stirred for 2 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to –78 °C and treated with CBr4 (3.90 g, 11.7 mmol) in THF (1 mL) and then warmed to room temp. over 1.5 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with brine (30 mL) and 2 M HCl (30 mL) and then extracted with Et2O (3 × 40 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4) and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 30 % Et2O in petroleum ether) gave an oil which was subsequently distilled under reduced pressure (1.3 Torr, 120 °C) to give 2-bromohex-5-enoic acid (18a, 517 mg, 46 %) as a yellow oil. IR (CDCl3 cast): Inline graphicmax = 3081 (br), 2934, 2881, 2850, 1715 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.03–2.33 (m, 4 H, 3-H, 4-H), 4.27 (dd, 3JH,H = 8.1, 6.2 Hz, 1 H, 2-H), 5.06 (d, 3JH,H = 10.5 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 5.11 (dd, 3JH,H = 16.9, 2JH,H = 1.5 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 5.76 (ddt, 3JH,H = 17.1, 10.4, 6.6 Hz, 1 H, 5-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 31.2 (C-4), 33.7 (C-3), 44.6 (C-2), 116.8 (C-6), 135.9 (C-5), 174.2 (C-1) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 195/193 (100) [MH]+, 177/175 (100) [MH – H2O]+, 113 (97) [MH – HBr]+. HRMS (CI): calcd. for C6H1079BrO2 [MH]+ 192.9864; found 192.9869.

A stirred solution of acid 18a (155 mg, 0.80 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was treated with oxalyl chloride (0.202 mL, 2.41 mmol) and DMF (1 drop) and then stirred for 1.5 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo to give acyl chloride 18 (contaminated with DMF, 115 mg, <68 %) as an oil. IR (film): Inline graphicmax = 2933, 2885, 2863, 1718, 1642 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.14 (m, 1 H, 3-H), 2.20–2.33 (m, 3 H, 3-H, 4-H), 4.52 (dd, 3JH,H = 8.1, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, 2-H), 5.10 (d, 3JH,H = 10.4 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 5.13 (dd, 3JH,H = 16.9, 2JH,H = 1.1 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 5.75 (ddt, 3JH,H = 16.9, 10.4, 6.4 Hz, 1 H, 5-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 30.9 (C-4), 33.8 (C-3), 53.6 (C-2), 117.5 (C-6), 135.3 (C-5), 170.3 (C-1) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 209/207 (82), 177/175 (15) [MH – HCl]+, 163 (48), 127 (100).

Ethyl (2S,4R)-2-Acetoxymethyl-4-(furan-3-ylmethyl)-5-(2-oxooxan-3-ylsulfanyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole-4-carboxylate (19): NaH (60 % dispersion in oil, 58 mg, 1.45 mmol) was washed with hexanes and then suspended in THF (7 mL), cooled to 0 °C and treated dropwise with a solution of thiolactam 16 (394 mg, 1.21 mmol) in THF (2 mL) and then stirred for 30 min. The reaction mixture was treated dropwise with a solution of lactone 17 (234 mg, 1.31 mmol) in THF (1 mL) and then warmed to room temp. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h and then diluted with H2O (12 mL). The organic material was extracted with EtOAc (4 × 15 mL) and the organic extracts were combined, washed with brine (2 × 15 mL), dried (MgSO4) and then concentrated in vacuo to give thioimidate 19 (6:4 mixture of diastereomers, 340 mg, 66 %) as a brown oil which was used in the next step without further purification. IR (CDCl3 cast): Inline graphicmax = 2924, 2872, 2854, 1729 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.30 (t, 3JH,H = 7.1 Hz, 3 × 0.6 H, CH2CH3maj), 1.31 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 3 × 0.4 H, CH2CH3min), 1.88–2.00 (m, 2 H, CH2CH2O), 2.04 (s, 3 × 0.6 H, CH3COmaj), 2.05 (s, 3 × 0.4 H, CH3COmin), 2.16 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.3, 3JH,H = 8.4 Hz, 0.6 H, 3-Hmaj), 2.20 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.4, 3JH,H = 8.0 Hz, 0.4 H, 3-Hmin), 2.24–2.35 (m, 3 H, 3-H, CH2CHS), 2.91 (d, 2JH,H = 14.8 Hz, 0.6 H, Fur-CH2maj), 2.92 (d, 2JH,H = 14.8 Hz, 0.4 H, Fur-CH2min), 3.07 (d, 2JH,H = 14.8 Hz, 0.6 H, Fur-CH2maj), 3.08 (d, 2JH,H = 14.8 Hz, 0.4 H, Fur-CH2min), 3.87–3.93 (m, 1.4 H, 2-H, CHSmin), 4.07 (dd, 2JH,H = 11.2, 3JH,H = 6.2 Hz, 0.6 H, AcOCH2maj), 4.13 (dd, 2JH,H = 11.0, 3JH,H = 6.2 Hz, 0.4 H, AcOCH2min), 4.18–4.28 (m, 3 H, AcOCH2, CH2CH3), 4.37–4.47 (m, 2 H, CHSmaj, CH2O), 4.53 (dt, 2JH,H = 10.8, 3JH,H = 4.3 Hz, 0.6 H, CH2O), 6.34 (d, 3JH,H = 1.8 Hz, 0.4 H, Fur-Hmin), 6.35 (d, 3JH,H = 1.8 Hz, 0.6 H, Fur-Hmaj), 7.30 (s, 0.6 H, Fur-Hmaj), 7.31 (s, 0.4 H, Fur-Hmin), 7.33 (s, 0.6 H, Fur-Hmaj), 7.34 (s, 0.4 H, Fur-Hmin) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.1 (CH2CH3min), 14.2 (CH2CH3maj), 21.03 (CH3COmaj), 21.04 (CH3COmin), 23.0 (CH2CH2Omin), 24.0 (CH2CH2Omaj), 27.2 (CH2CHSmin), 27.8 (CH2CHSmaj), 30.5 (Fur-CH2maj), 30.7 (Fur-CH2min), 35.7 (C-3maj), 35.9 (C-3min), 43.9 (CHSmaj), 44.1 (CHSmin), 62.05 (CH2CH3maj), 62.13 (CH2CH3min), 66.3 (C-4maj), 66.58 (C-4min), 66.60 (AcOCH2maj), 66.7 (AcOCH2min), 69.1 (CH2Omin), 69.5 (CH2Omaj), 69.8 (C-2min), 70.0 (C-2maj), 111.7 (Fur-C-4maj), 111.8 (Fur-C-4min), 118.9 (Fur-C-3maj), 119.0 (Fur-C-3min), 141.2 (Fur-C-2min), 141.4 (Fur-C-2maj), 143.1 (Fur-C-5min), 143.3 (Fur-C-5maj), 168.9 (SCHCOmaj), 169.3 (SCHCOmin), 170.2 (CO2Etmaj), 170.6 (CO2Etmin), 171.0 (CH3COmaj), 171.1 (CH3COmin), 171.3 (C-5maj), 171.4 (C-5min) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 424 (100) [MH]+. HRMS (CI): calcd. for C20H26NO7S [MH]+ 424.1430; found 424.1433.

Ethyl (2E,3S,5S)-5-Acetoxymethyl-3-(furan-3-ylmethyl)-2-(2-oxooxan-3-ylidene)pyrrolidine-3-carboxylate (20): A stirred solution of thioimidate 19 (31 mg, 0.073 mmol) in toluene (2 mL) was heated at 160 °C in a sealed tube for 18 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 70 % Et2O in petroleum ether) gave vinylogous carbamate 20 (23 mg, 81 %) as a yellow viscous oil. [α]D20 = +269 (c = 0.7, CHCl3). IR (film): Inline graphicmax = 3364 (br), 2923, 2854, 1728 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.29 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH3), 1.77–1.89 (m, 2 H, CH2CH2O), 2.00 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.2, 3JH,H = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.06 (s, 3 H, CH3CO), 2.13–2.21 (m, 2 H, 4-H, C=C-CH2), 2.39 (m, 1 H, C=C-CH2), 3.03 (d, 2JH,H = 14.9 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.07 (d, 2JH,H = 14.9 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 3.46 (qd, 3JH,H = 7.8, 3.8 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 3.82 (dd, 2JH,H = 11.1, 3JH,H = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, AcOCH2), 4.09 (dd, 2JH,H = 11.1, 3JH,H = 4.1 Hz, 1 H, AcOCH2), 4.20–4.30 (m, 4 H, CH2CH3, CH2CH2O), 6.21 (br. s, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.28 (s, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.33 (t, 2JH,H = 3JH,H = 1.5 Hz, 1 H, Fur-H), 9.43 (s, 1 H, NH) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.3 (CH2CH3), 20.9 (CH3CO), 23.0 (C=CCH2), 23.2 (CH2CH2O), 29.4 (Fur-CH2), 37.1 (C-4), 56.5 (C-5), 57.7 (C-3), 62.0 (CH2CH3), 67.0 (AcOCH2), 68.4 (CH2CH2O), 83.9 (NC=C), 112.0 (Fur-C-4), 118.7 (Fur-C-3), 141.3 (Fur-C-5), 143.5 (Fur-C-2), 164.9 (NC=C), 169.7 (C=CCO), 170.9 (CH3CO), 173.4 (CO2Et) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 392 (100) [MH]+. HRMS (CI): calcd. for C20H26NO7 [MH]+ 392.1909; found 392.1706.

Ethyl (1R,8R,10S)-10-Acetoxymethyl-13-(but-3-enyl)-12-oxo-3-oxa-14-thia-11-azatetracyclo[6.6.0.01,11.02,6]tetradeca-2(6),4-diene-8-carboxylate (21) and Ethyl (3E,6R,8S)-8-Acetoxymethyl-3-(but-3-enylidene)-6-(furan-3-ylmethyl)-2-oxo-4-thia-1-azabicyclo[3.3.0]octane-6-carboxylate (22): A stirred solution of thiolactam 16 (136 mg, 0.418 mmol) in toluene (2 mL) was treated with acyl chloride 18 (129 mg, 0.610 mmol) in toluene (2 mL). The reaction mixture was heated at reflux for 7 h and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 10–20 % EtOAc in hexane) gave bicycle 22 (64 mg, 36 %) as a yellow oil. [α]D20 = –19 (c = 1.0, CHCl3). IR (film): Inline graphicmax = 2937, 2907, 2882, 1738, 1683, 1634 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.30 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH3), 2.08 (s, 3 H, CH3CO), 2.26 (ddd, 2JH,H = 13.9, 3JH,H = 8.7, 1.2 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 2.35 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.9, 3JH,H = 7.7 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 2.90 (br. t, 3JH,H = 6.9 Hz, 2 H, CH2=CHCH2), 3.20 (d, 2JH,H = 14.9 Hz, 1 H, Fur-CH2), 4.11–4.33 (m, 5 H, AcOCH2, 8-H, CH2CH3), 5.08 (br. d, 3JH,H = 10.1 Hz, 1 H, CH=CH2), 5.14 (br. d, 3JH,H = 17.0 Hz, 1 H, CH=CH2), 5.20 (s, 1 H, 5-H), 5.82 (ddt, 3JH,H = 16.9, 10.1, 6.3 Hz, 1 H, CH=CH2), 6.13 (s, 1 H, Fur-H), 6.78 (t, 3JH,H = 7.4 Hz, 1 H, C=CH), 7.20 (s, 1 H, Fur-H), 7.35 (br. s, 1 H, Fur-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.3 (CH2CH3), 21.0 (CH3CO), 25.5 (Fur-CH2), 33.3 (C-7), 34.7 (CH2=CHCH2), 53.4 (C-8), 55.1 (C-6), 61.9 (CH2CH3), 64.9 (AcOCH2), 67.3 (C-5), 111.5 (Fur-C-4), 116.9 (CH2=CH), 118.6 (Fur-C-3), 126.4 (C=CH), 130.9 (C=CH), 133.2 (CH2=CH), 140.9 (Fur-C-2), 143.3 (Fur-C-5), 166.4 (C-2), 170.8 (CH3CO), 172.1 (CO2Et) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 420 (100) [MH]+. HRMS (CI): calcd. for C21H26NO6S [MH]+ 420.1481; found 420.1479.

Further elution (20 % EtOAc in hexane) gave tetracycle 21 (37 mg, 21 %, 4:1 ratio of diastereoisomers) as a yellow oil. IR (film): Inline graphicmax = 2937, 2907, 2878, 1734, 1685, 1640 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.30 (t, 3JH,H = 6.8 Hz, 2.4 H, CH2CH3maj), 1.32 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 0.6 H, CH2CH3min), 1.75 (m, 0.8 H, SCHCH2maj), 2.06 (s, 2.4 H, CH3COmaj), 2.07 (s, 0.6 H, CH3COmin), 2.09–2.15 (m, 1.8 H, CH2=CHCH2maj, SCHCH2min), 2.15–2.20 (m, 1 H, 9-H), 2.21–2.37 (m, 1.4 H, SCHCH2, CH2=CHCH2min), 2.60 (d, 2JH,H = 15.1 Hz, 0.2 H, 7-Hmin), 2.61 (d, 2JH,H = 15.4 Hz, 0.8 H, 7-Hmaj), 2.89 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.4, 3JH,H = 8.7 Hz, 0.2 H, 9-Hmin), 2.99 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.6, 3JH,H = 8.7 Hz, 0.8 H, 9-Hmaj), 3.36 (d, 2JH,H = 15.4 Hz, 0.8 H, C7-Hmaj), 3.40 (d, 2JH,H = 15.1 Hz, 0.2 H, 7-Hmin), 3.73 (m, 0.8 H, 10-Hmaj), 3.77 (dd, 3JH,H = 10.0, 3.8 Hz, 0.2 H, 13-Hmin), 4.14 (dd, 2JH,H = 11.3, 3JH,H = 5.2 Hz, 0.2 H, AcOCH2min), 4.18–4.31 (m, 1.4 H, CH2CH3, 10-Hmin, AcOCH2min), 4.38 (dd, 3JH,H = 9.3, 3.7 Hz, 0.8 H, 13-Hmaj), 4.55 (dd, 2JH,H = 11.3, 3JH,H = 6.7 Hz, 0.8 H, AcOCH2maj), 4.92 (dd, 2JH,H = 11.3, 3JH,H = 4.4 Hz, 0.8 H, AcOCH2maj), 4.99–5.08 (m, 2 H, CH2=CH), 5.74–5.84 (m, 1 H, CH2=CH), 6.23 (d, 3JH,H = 2.0 Hz, 0.8 H, 5-Hmaj), 6.24 (d, 3JH,H = 2.0 Hz, 0.2 H, 5-Hmin), 7.43 (d, 3JH,H = 2.0 Hz, 0.8 H, 4-Hmaj), 7.47 (d, 3JH,H = 2.0 Hz, 0.2 H, 4-Hmin) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.32 (CH2CH3min), 14.36 (CH2CH3maj), 21.01 (COCH3maj), 21.04 (COCH3min), 31.3 (CH2=CHCH2), 31.9 (SCHCH2min), 32.0 (SCHCH2maj), 33.4 (C-7min), 34.4 (C-7maj), 42.1 (C-9maj), 43.1 (C-9min), 51.1 (C-13maj), 51.9 (C-13min), 55.4 (C-10maj), 56.0 (C-10min), 61.8 (AcOCH2maj), 61.95 (AcOCH2min), 62.0 (CH2CH3min), 62.1 (CH2CH3maj), 66.3 (C-8maj), 67.0 (C-8min), 78.0 (C-1maj), 79.4 (C-1min), 108.3 (C-5maj), 108.5 (C-5min), 116.08 (CH2=CHmaj), 116.13 (CH2=CHmin), 125.8 (C-6maj), 126.6 (C-6min), 136.9 (CH2=CHmaj), 137.1 (CH2=CHmin), 149.3 (C-4maj), 149.7 (C-4min), 153.4 (C-2min), 154.5 (C-2maj), 170.7 (C-12maj), 170.8 (CH3COmaj), 170.9 (CH3COmin), 171.8 (C-12min), 171.9 (CO2Etmaj), 172.0 (CO2Etmin) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 420 (100) [MH]+, 378 (16), 360 (52) [MH – HOAc]+, 292 (22). HRMS (CI): calcd. for C21H26NO6S [MH]+ 420.1481; found 420.1475.

(5S)-2,2-Dimethyl-3-oxa-1-azabicyclo[3.3.0]octan-8-one (27):18 A stirred suspension of L-pyroglutaminol (10.9 g, 94.7 mmol) in toluene (100 mL) was treated with 2,2-dimethoxypropane (15.1 mL, 123 mmol) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (360 mg, 1.89 mmol) and then heated at reflux for 2 h. MeOH was removed from the reaction mixture by distillation and further 2,2-dimethoxypropane (15.1 mL, 123 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was heated at reflux for 30 min and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 50–75 % Et2O in hexane) gave acetonide 27 (10.6 g, 72 %) as a colourless solid, m.p. 24–25 °C (ref.17b = 36–37 °C). IR (solid): Inline graphicmax = 2980, 2933, 2888, 1670 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.45 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.65 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.75 (tt, 2JH,H = 12.2, 3JH,H = 12.2, 9.0 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 2.16 (m, 1 H, 6-H), 2.53 (dd, 2JH,H = 16.6, 3JH,H = 9.1 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 2.79 (ddd, 2JH,H = 16.6, 3JH,H = 12.1, 8.5 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 3.44 (t, 2JH,H = 3JH,H = 8.8 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.07 (dd, 2JH,H = 8.2, 3JH,H = 5.7 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.25 (tt, 3JH,H = 8.8, 6.0 Hz, 1 H, 5-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 23.9 (CH3), 24.4 (C-6), 26.9 (CH3), 37.3 (C-7), 61.7 (C-5), 70.0 (C-4), 91.4 (C-2), 171.6 (C-8) ppm.

Ethyl (5S)-2,2-Dimethyl-8-oxo-3-oxa-1-azabicyclo[3.3.0]octane-7-carboxylate (28): A flask charged with LHMDS (1 M in toluene, 0.64 mL, 0.64 mmol) at –78 °C was treated dropwise with a solution of lactam 27 (500 mg, 0.322 mmol) and diethyl carbonate (0.507 mL, 4.19 mmol) in THF (12 mL) over 30 min. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h and then warmed to 0 °C and quenched with AcOH (0.92 mL). Et2O (12 mL) was added and the mixture was concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 70 % Et2O in hexane) gave ester 28 (663 mg, 91 %, 6:4 mixture of diastereoisomers) as a colourless oil. IR (film): Inline graphicmax = 2984, 2938, 2873, 1735, 1694 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.30 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 1.2 H, CH2CH3min), 1.31 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 1.8 H, CH2CH3maj), 1.46 (s, 1.8 H, CH3maj), 1.46 (s, 1.2 H, CH3min), 1.65 (s, 1.8 H, CH3maj), 1.66 (s, 1.2 H, CH3min), 1.96 (dt, 2JH,H = 12.9, 3JH,H = 8.8 Hz, 0.4 H, 6-Hmin), 2.24 (td, 2JH,H = 12.1, 3JH,H = 8.8 Hz, 0.6 H, 6-Hmaj), 2.36 (ddd, 2JH,H = 12.6, 3JH,H = 7.7, 6.2 Hz, 0.6 H, 6-Hmaj), 2.49 (dd, 3JH,H = 12.7, 3JH,H = 6.2 Hz, 0.4 H, 6-Hmin), 3.45 (t, 2JH,H = 3JH,H = 8.9 Hz, 0.4 H, 4-Hmin), 3.55 (t, 2JH,H = 3JH,H = 8.8 Hz, 0.6 H, 4-Hmaj), 3.60 (d, 3JH,H = 9.2 Hz, 0.4 H, 7-Hmin), 3.81 (dd, 3JH,H = 11.7, 8.0 Hz, 0.6 H, 7-Hmaj), 4.07–4.14 (m, 1 H, 4-H), 4.14–4.30 (m, 2.6 H, CH2CH3, 5-Hmaj), 4.47 (tt, 3JH,H = 8.9, 6.1 Hz, 0.4 H, 5-Hmin) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.2 (CH2CH3min), 14.3 (CH2CH3maj), 23.7 (CH3min), 23.8 (CH3maj), 26.7 (CH3min), 26.8 (CH3maj), 28.0 (C-6maj), 28.2 (C-6min), 54.2 (C-7maj), 55.3 (C-7min), 59.2 (C-5maj), 60.8 (C-5min), 61.8 (CH2CH3maj), 61.9 (CH2CH3min), 69.8 (C-4maj), 69.9 (C-4min), 91.8 (C-2min), 91.9 (C-2maj), 166.0 (C-8min), 166.4 (C-8maj), 169.5 (CO2Etmaj), 169.7 (CO2Etmin) ppm. MS (ES+): m/z (%) = 250 (50) [MNa]+. HRMS (ES+): calcd. for C11H17NO4Na [MNa]+ 250.1055; found 250.1055.

(5S)-2,2-Dimethyl-3-oxa-1-azabicyclo[3.3.0]octane-8-thione (29): A stirred solution of ethyl L-pyroglutamate (30;21 2.00 g, 12.7 mmol) in THF (30 mL) was treated with Lawesson's reagent (2.60 g, 6.33 mmol) and then stirred for 2 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo. Purification by repeated flash chromatography (SiO2, 40 % EtOAc in hexane and then SiO2, 65 % Et2O in hexane) gave ethyl (S)-5-thioxopyrrolidine-2-carboxylate (30a; 1.80 g, 82 %) as a colourless solid, m.p. 37–38 °C (ref.22 = 35–36 °C). IR (solid): Inline graphicmax = 3300 (br), 2982, 2941, 2875, 1743, 1716, 1524 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.30 (t, 3JH,H = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 2.35 (ddt, 2JH,H = 13.2, 3JH,H = 9.3, 6.7 Hz, 1 H, 3-H), 2.56 (dtd, 2JH,H = 13.2, 3JH,H = 8.9, 5.9 Hz, 1 H, 3-H), 2.92 (ddd, 2JH,H = 18.2, 3JH,H = 9.0, 7.3 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.99 (ddd, 2JH,H = 18.2, 3JH,H = 9.4 6.0 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.20–4.29 (m, 2 H, CH2CH3), 4.51 (dd, 3JH,H = 8.7, 6.4 Hz, 1 H, 2-H), 8.10 (br. s, 1 H, NH) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.2 (CH3), 27.2 (C-3), 42.7 (C-4), 62.3 (CH2CH3), 62.6 (C-2), 170.1 (CO2Et), 206.8 (C-5) ppm.

A stirred solution of ester 30a (11.1 g, 64.1 mmol) in THF (100 mL) was treated with LiBH4 (1.50 g, 70.5 mmol) and then stirred for 1 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C and treated with 20 % aqueous acetic acid (40 mL) and then adsorbed onto silica gel. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 6 % MeOH in CHCl3) gave (S)-5-hydroxymethylpyrrolidine-2-thione (30b; 7.43 g, 88 %) as a colourless solid, m.p. 125–126 °C (ref.22 = 124–125 °C). IR (solid): Inline graphicmax = 3178 (br), 3046 (br), 2973, 2932, 2877, 1532 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 1.85 (dddd, 2JH,H = 12.8, 3JH,H = 9.4, 6.0, 5.3 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.09 (dddd, 3JH,H = 12.7, 3JH,H = 9.6, 8.4, 6.6 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 2.65 (ddd, 2JH,H = 17.8, 3JH,H = 9.8, 6.4 Hz, 1 H, 3-H), 2.73 (ddd, 2JH,H = 18.1, 3JH,H = 9.4, 6.4 Hz, 1 H, 3-H), 3.37–3.44 (m, 2 H, CH2OH), 3.84 (dt, 3JH,H = 13.2, 4.5 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 4.91 (t, 3JH,H = 5.5 Hz, 1 H, OH), 10.12 (br. s, 1 H, NH) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 24.7 (C-4), 43.2 (C-3), 62.7 (CH2OH), 63.6 (C-5), 203.7 (C-2) ppm.

A stirred suspension of thiolactam 30b (0.40 g, 3.1 mmol) in toluene (4 mL) was treated with 2,2-dimethoxypropane (0.487 mL, 3.96 mmol) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (12 mg, 0.061 mmol). The mixture was heated at reflux for 3 h and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 30–50 % Et2O in petroleum ether) gave bicycle 29 (268 mg, 51 %) as a colourless solid, m.p. 74–75 °C; [α]D20 = +241 (c = 1.0, CHCl3). IR (CHCl3 cast): Inline graphicmax = 2987, 2940, 2871, 1476 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.67 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.80 (tdd, 2JH,H = 12.2, 3JH,H = 12.2, 10.3, 8.5 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 1.83 (s, 3 H, CH3), 2.17 (dt, 2JH,H = 12.2, 3JH,H = 6.3 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 3.25 (dd, 2JH,H = 17.3, 3JH,H = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 3.34 (ddd, 2JH,H = 17.3, 3JH,H = 12.5, 7.3 Hz, 1 H, 7-H), 3.53 (dd, 3JH,H = 10.0, 2JH,H = 8.6 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.10 (dd, 2JH,H = 8.6, 3JH,H = 5.5 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.49 (tt, 3JH,H = 10.5, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, 5-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 22.2 (CH3), 24.9 (CH3), 26.1 (C-6), 52.5 (C-7), 68.0 (C-4), 69.6 (C-5), 93.4 (C-2), 195.8 (C-8) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 172 (100) [MH]+. HRMS (CI): calcd. for C8H14NOS [MH]+ 172.0796; found 172.0791. C8H14NOS (171.26): C 56.10, H 7.65, N 8.18, found C 56.22, H 7.71, N 8.16.

(5S,7S,1′R)-2,2-Dimethyl-7-(1-phenylprop-2-enyl)-3-oxa-1-azabicyclo[3.3.0]octane-8-thione (36): A stirred solution of thioamide 29 (205 mg, 1.20 mmol) in THF (5 mL) at 0 °C was treated with n-butyllithium (2.5 M in hexane, 0.55 mL, 1.3 mmol) and then stirred for 15 min. The reaction mixture was treated with cinnamyl bromide (260 mg, 1.32 mmol) in THF (1 mL) and stirred at 0 °C for 30 min and then at room temp. for 1 h. A saturated aq. NaHCO3 solution (6 mL) was added and the organic material extracted with Et2O (3 × 6 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine (6 mL), dried (MgSO4) and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 20 % Et2O in hexane) gave thioamide 36 (252 mg, 73 %, 92 % de) as a colourless solid, m.p. 119–120 °C; [α]D20 = –94 (c = 0.35, CHCl3). IR (CH2Cl2 cast): Inline graphicmax = 2984, 2928, 2869, 1484 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, data for major diastereoisomer): δ = 1.40 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.80 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.90 (dt, 2JH,H = 12.7, 3JH,H = 9.7 Hz, 1 H, C6-H), 2.09 (dd, 2JH,H = 12.7, 3JH,H = 6.5 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 2.82 (tt, 3JH,H = 10.0, 6.0 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 3.25 (dd, 3JH,H = 10.2, 2JH,H = 8.4 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 3.73 (dd, 2JH,H = 8.4, 3JH,H = 5.6 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 3.78 (dd, 3JH,H = 9.4, 3.1 Hz, 1 H, 1′-H), 4.34 (m, 1 H, 7-H), 5.15 (ddd, 3JH,H = 17.4, 2JH,H = 1.9, 4JH,H = 1.1 Hz, 1 H, 3′-H), 5.28 (ddd, 3JH,H = 10.6, 2JH,H = 1.8, 4JH,H = 0.9 Hz, 1 H, 3′-H), 6.20 (ddd, 3JH,H = 17.5, 10.6, 5.4 Hz, 1 H, 2′-H), 7.26–7.38 (m, 5 H, Ar-H) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3, data for major diastereoisomer): δ = 22.3 (CH3), 24.3 (CH3), 26.4 (C-6), 50.1 (C-7), 66.8 (C-1′), 68.3 (C-4), 68.4 (C-5), 93.2 (C-2), 115.6 (C-3′), 127.7 (CH), 128.4 (CH), 128.9 (CH), 138.8 (C-2′), 139.5 (C), 197.6 (C-8) ppm. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 287 (23) [M]+, 117 (17) [PhCHCH=CH2]+, 86 (100). HRMS (EI): calcd. for C17H21NOS [M]+ 287.1339; found 287.1341.

(5S,7S,1′R)-2,2-Dimethyl-N-phenyl-7-(1-phenylprop-2-enyl)-8-thioxo-3-oxa-1-azabicyclo[3.3.0]octane-7-carboxamide (37): A stirred solution of thioamide 29 (141 mg, 0.824 mmol) in THF (2 mL) at 0 °C was treated with n-butyllithium (2.02 M in hexanes, 0.40 mL, 0.81 mmol) and then stirred for 25 min. The reaction mixture was cooled to –78 °C and then treated with (Z)-cinnamyl bromide (195 mg, 0.99 mmol) in THF (2 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 15 min and then warmed to 0 °C and treated with AcOH (3 μL, 50 μmol) followed immediately by PhNCO (120 μL, 1.1 mmol). The reaction mixture was warmed to room temp. over 18 h and then quenched with brine (4 mL). The organic material was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 5 mL) and the combined extracts were dried (hydrophobic frit) and then concentrated in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography (SiO2, 13 % EtOAc in hexane) gave thioamide 37 (155 mg, 46 %, 96 % de) as a colourless solid. M.p 116–117 °C; [α]D25 = +56.8 (c = 1.02, CHCl3). IR (solid): Inline graphicmax = 3184, 2986, 2926, 2863, 1670, 1549 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.56 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.77 (s, 3 H, CH3), 2.39 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.6, 3JH,H = 9.9 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 2.59 (dd, 2JH,H = 13.6, 3JH,H = 6.6 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 2.95 (tt, 3JH,H = 10.1, 6.0 Hz, 1 H, 5-H), 3.26 (dd, 3JH,H = 10.3, 2JH,H = 8.5 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 3.86 (dd, 2JH,H = 8.5, 3JH,H = 5.5 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 4.01 (d, 3JH,H = 9.6 Hz, 1 H, 1′-H), 5.08 (dd, 3JH,H = 10.1, 2JH,H = 1.2 Hz, 1 H, 3′-H), 5.12 (d, 3JH,H = 16.8 Hz, 1 H, 3′-H), 6.69 (dt, 3JH,H = 16.8, 9.8 Hz, 1 H, 2′-H), 7.11 (tt, 3JH,H = 7.3, 4JH,H = 1.1 Hz, 1 H, Ar-H), 7.28–7.36 (m, 5 H, Ar-H), 7.43 (m, 2 H, Ar-H), 7.55 (m, 2 H, Ar-H), 11.31 (s, 1 H, NH) ppm. 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 22.0 (CH3), 24.0 (CH3), 33.5 (C-6), 59.9 (C-1′), 64.4 (C-5), 68.6 (C-4), 77.1 (C-7), 94.5 (C-2), 118.1 (C-3′), 120.1 (CH), 124.5 (CH), 128.2 (CH), 128.9 (CH), 129.0 (CH), 129.1 (CH), 136.1 (C-2′), 137.7 (C), 138.7 (C), 168.7 (CONH), 192.9 (C-8) ppm. MS (CI): m/z (%) = 407 (8) [MH]+, 349 (23) [MH – OC(CH3)2]+, 291 (100), 233 (73), 119 (28), 82 (69), 56 (28). HRMS (CI): calcd. for C24H27N2O2S [MH]+ 407.1793; found 407.1796.

Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this article): 1D 1H and 13C NMR spectra, and selected 2D NMR spectra of all compounds synthesised.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Abil Aliev for assistance with NMR spectroscopy, and Dr. Lisa Haigh for mass spectrometry. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council is thanked for an Industrial CASE Award.

Supporting Information

Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201301063.

(see footnote on the first page of this article): 1D 1H and 13C NMR spectra, and selected 2D NMR spectra of all compounds synthesised.

ejoc2014-0129-sd1.pdf (16.3MB, pdf)

References

  • [1 a)].Kobayashi J, Watanabe N, Kawasaki N, Tsuda M. J. Org. Chem. 1997;62:9236–9239. [Google Scholar]
  • [1 b)].Kobayashi J, Tsuda M, Ishibashi M. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999;71 [Google Scholar]
  • [2 a)].Nagata T, Nakagawa M, Nishida A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:7484–7485. doi: 10.1021/ja034464j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2 b)].Nagata T, Nakagawa M, Nishida S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125 doi: 10.1021/ja034464j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2 c)].Ono K, Nakagawa M, Nishida A. Angew. Chem. 2004;116 doi: 10.1002/anie.200453673. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2020–2023; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2 d)].Young IS, Kerr MA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:1465–1469. doi: 10.1021/ja068047t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2 e)].Jakubec P, Cockfield DM, Dixon DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:16632–16633. doi: 10.1021/ja908399s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2 f)].Nilson MG, Funk RL. Org. Lett. 2010;12:4912–4915. doi: 10.1021/ol102079z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2 g)].Kyle AF, Jakubec P, Cockfield DM, Cleator E, Skidmore J, Dixon DJ. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:10037–10039. doi: 10.1039/c1cc13665h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2 h)].Jakubec P, Kyle AF, Calleja J, Dixon DJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:6094–6097. [Google Scholar]
  • [2 i)].Cheng G, Wu F, Yang X, Zhou Y, Wan X, Zhai H. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:12569–12572. doi: 10.1002/chem.201102101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2 j)].Yu M, Wang C, Kyle AF, Jakubec P, Dixon DJ, Schrock RR, Hoveyda AH. Nature. 2011;479:88–93. doi: 10.1038/nature10563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2 k)].Wang C, Yu M, Kyle AM, Jakubec P, Dixon DJ, Schrock RR, Hoveyda AH. Chem. Eur. J. 2013;19:2726–2740. doi: 10.1002/chem.201204045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2 l)].Bonazzi S, Cheng S, Wzorek JS, Evans DA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:9338–9341. doi: 10.1021/ja404673s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].For ABCDE pentacycles, see:
  • [4].for ABCD tetracycles, see:
  • [5].For ADE tricycles, see:
  • [6].For ABD tricycles, see:
  • [7].For the BC bicycle, see: Leclerc E, Tius MA. Org. Lett. 2003;5:1171–1174. doi: 10.1021/ol034110x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].For the CF bicycle, see: Fürstner A, Guth O, Rumbo A, Seidel G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:11108–11113. [Google Scholar]
  • [9].For the DE bicycle, see: Stockman RA, McDermott PJ, Newton AF, Magnus P. Synlett. 2010:559–562. [Google Scholar]
  • [10 a)].Sheehan SM, Beall LS, Padwa A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:4761–4764. [Google Scholar]
  • [10 b)].Padwa A, Beall S, Heidelbaugh TM, Liu B, Sheehan SM. J. Org. Chem. 2000;65:2684–2695. doi: 10.1021/jo991742h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].For examples of diastereoselective thia-Claisen reactions of thiolactams, see:
  • [12].Prepared from furan-3-methanol by treatment with PBr3. Fernández Mateios A, López Barba AM. J. Org. Chem. 1995;60:3580–3585. [Google Scholar]
  • [13 a)].Scheibye S, Pederson BS, Lawesson SO. Bull. Soc. Chim.Belg. 1978;87:229–238. [Google Scholar]
  • [13 b)].Ozturk T, Ertas E, Mert O. Chem.Rev. 2007;107:5210–5278. doi: 10.1021/cr040650b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].The cheaper L. enantiomer of pyroglutamic acid was used for these studies; a synthesis of (+)-nakadomarin A would require use of the D enantiomer.
  • [15].Thottathil JK, Moniot JL, Mueller RH, Wong MKY, Kissick TP. J. Org. Chem. 1986;51:3140–3143. [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Peyrane F, Fourrey J-L, Clivio P. Chem. Commun. 2003:736–737. doi: 10.1039/b211405d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17 a)].Bamford MJ, Beard M, Cherry MJ, Moloney MG. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 1995;6:337–340. [Google Scholar]
  • [17 b)].Beard MJ, Bailey MJ, Cherry DT, Moloney MD, Shim SB, Statham SA, Bamford MJ, Lamont RB. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:3719–374. [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Allen NE, Boyd DB, Campbell JB, Deeter JB, Elzey TK, Foster BJ, Hatfield LD, Hornback WJ, Hunden DC, Jones ND, Kinnick MD, Munroe JE, Swartzendruber JK, Vogt DG. Tetrahedron. 1989;45:1905–1928. [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Yokoyama M, Hasegawa Y, Hatanaka H, Kawazoe Y, Imamota T. Synthesis. 1984:827–829. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Bergman J, Pettersson B, Hasimbegovic V, Svensson PH. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:1546–1553. doi: 10.1021/jo101865y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Smith MB, Dembofsky BT, Son YC. J. Org. Chem. 1994;59:1719–1725. [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Busqué F, de March P, Figueredo M, Font J, Gallagher T, Milán S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2002;13:437–445. [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Takahata H, Tomiguchi A, Nakano M, Yamazaki T. Heterocycles. 1982;19:180. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Takahata H, Tomiguchi A, Nakano M, Yamazaki T. Synthesis. 1982:156–157. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].CCDC-949528 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via. http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
  • [26].Coles SJ, Gale PA. Chem. Sci. 2012;3:683–689. [Google Scholar]
  • [27].He S, Kozmin SA, Rawal VH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:190–191. [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Thomsen I, Clausen K, Scheibye S, Lawesson S-O. Org. Synth. 1990;7:372–374. [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Cardinale G, Laan JAM, Ward JP. Tetrahedron. 1985;41:2899–2902. [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Christoffers J, Oertling H, Fischer P, Frey W. Tetrahedron. 2003;59:3769–3778. [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Wolff JJ, Frenking G, Harms K. Chem. Ber. 1991;124:551–561. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ejoc2014-0129-sd1.pdf (16.3MB, pdf)

Articles from European Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES