Abstract
Metastasis causes most deaths from colon cancer yet mechanistic understanding and therapeutic options remain limited. Here we show that expression of microRNA (miR)-192 is inversely correlated with metastatic potential of colon cancer cells. Ectopic expression of miR-192 sensitizes colon cancer cells to growth factor deprivation stress (GFDS)-induced apoptosis whereas inhibition of miR-192 confers resistance. Overexpression of miR-192 inhibits metastatic colonization to the liver in an orthotopic mouse model of colon cancer. Alterations associated with the metastatic phenotype in the primary tumors include increased apoptosis, decreased proliferation and angiogenesis. Further studies indicate that miR-192 down-regulates expression of Bcl-2, Zeb2 and VEGFA in vitro and in vivo, which is responsible for enhanced apoptosis, increased expression of E-cadherin and decreased angiogenesis in vivo respectively. Finally, studies performed on human colonic adenocarcinoma show that expression of miR-192 is significantly reduced in neoplastic cells as compared to normal colonic epithelium. Importantly, there is a significant decrease of miR-192 expression in stage IV tumors when compared to stage I or II lesions. These findings indicate that miR-192 plays an important role in colon cancer development and progression. Our studies underscore the clinical relevance and prognostic significance of miR-192 expression in colon cancer. Therefore, a major implication of our studies is that restoration of miR-192 expression or antagonism of its target genes (Bcl-2, Zeb2 or VEGFA) may have considerable therapeutic potential for anti-metastatic therapy in patients with colon cancer.
Keywords: colon cancer, liver metastasis, miR-192, Bcl-2, Zeb2, VEGFA
INTRODUCTION
Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the USA (1). The majority of these deaths are from metastatic disease, which is one of the hallmarks of colorectal cancer (2). While 5-year survival rate for early-stage colorectal cancer is approximately 90%, it is only 10–15% for metastatic colorectal cancer. Thus, targeting metastasis is an important strategy for colorectal cancer treatment and to improve patient outcomes. Metastasis is a complex and multi-step process (3;4). However, our knowledge of molecular mechanisms governing the metastatic process of colon cancer is very limited. It has been previously demonstrated that metastasis is associated with aberrant survival capacity and enhanced resistance to apoptosis, increased angiogenesis and epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) (5–7). Therefore, identification and characterization of molecules/pathways that control cell survival, angiogenesis and EMT is critical to our understanding of metastasis.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a group of small non-protein coding RNAs evolutionarily conserved in the genomes of animals, plants, fungi and viruses (8). miRNAs suppress expression of many different gene targets at the posttranscriptional level through sequence-specific interaction with their 3′ untranslated regions (UTR), which leads to translation inhibition or mRNA degradation (9). In human cells, miRNAs are estimated to regulate more than one third of human genes and the majority of genetic pathways (10). A significant number of miRNAs are located at unstable regions or genomic regions linked to cancer (11). Alterations in miRNA expression are found to be associated with many human cancers (12); miRNA profiling or signature of cancer is being utilized to identify potential tumor subtypes, diagnose cancer, determine treatment plan and predict patient outcome (13;14). In addition, miRNAs have been demonstrated to function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors depending upon their target genes (12).
Many miRNAs have been shown to affect metastasis in different cancers (15–17). The pleiotropic nature of gene regulation by miRNAs suggests that certain miRNAs may function as crucial mediators of cancer metastasis. In this study, we identify an anti-metastatic miRNA, miR-192, that inhibits metastasis at multiple steps by suppressing expression of several key pro-metastatic genes. We demonstrate that miR-192 sensitizes colon cancer cells to growth factor deprivation stress (GFDS)-induced apoptosis in vitro and suppresses liver metastasis of colon cancer cells in an orthotopic model in vivo. Characterization of parameters of primary tumors indicates that miR-192-expressing tumors display increased apoptosis, reduced proliferation and angiogenesis when compared to control tumors. Further studies reveal that miR-192 increases apoptosis by repressing expression of Bcl-2, a pro-survival protein that has been implicated to play an important role in colon cancer metastasis (Wang, et al., unpublished data). In addition, we identify Zeb2, a master transcriptional factor, as a direct target of miR-192. Zeb2 has been shown to promote EMT (18), an important determinant of metastasis. We show that miR-192 increases E-cadherin expression via suppression of Zeb2 expression in colon cancer cells. Furthermore, our studies indicate that miR-192 suppresses expression of VEGFA, an important pro-angiogenesis factor. Down-regulation of VEGFA by miR-192 leads to reduced vascularization of primary tumors, which contributes to diminished liver metastasis. Finally, quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) analyses performed on human colonic adenocarcinomas indicate an inverse relationship between miR-192 expression and advanced tumor stages in colon cancer patients. Our studies suggest that miR-192 could be an important determinant of colon cancer development and progression.
RESULTS
Expression of miR-192 is significantly reduced in metastatic colon cancer cell lines
It has been previously reported that TGFβ signaling mediates metastasis in colon cancer cells (19;20). To identify miRNAs that affect colon cancer metastasis, we search for miRNAs whose expression is regulated by TGFβ signaling. Expression of miR-192 has been shown to be induced by TGFβ in mouse glomerular mesangial cells (21) and down-regulated in colon cancer tissue samples (22;23). When TGFβ-responsive colon cancer FET cells were treated with TGFβ, expression of miR-192 was induced in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 1A). Given the function of TGFβ in colon cancer metastasis, these results suggest that miR-192 might play a role in colon cancer metastasis as well.
Figure 1. Expression of miR-192 in human colon cancer cell lines determined by real-time Q-PCR.

A, Expression of miR-192 in FET cells treated with TGFβ for indicated time periods. B, Expression of miR-192 in colon cancer cell lines with different metastatic potential. Values represent the means ± SE of triplicate Q-PCR values from a representative experiment performed at least three times.
To establish whether miR-192 is differentially expressed in colon cancer cells, metastatic and non-metastatic human colon cancer cell lines were examined for miR-192 expression. Quantitative-PCR assays showed that metastatic HCT116, RKO, RCA and GEO cells (20;24) exhibited around 100-fold reduced miR-192 expression as compared to non-metastatic or low-metastatic FET and HCT116b cells (19) (Fig. 1B), indicating an inverse correlation between miR-192 expression and metastatic potential in colon cancer cells.
miR-192 plays an important role in stress-induced apoptosis in vitro
We next characterized the biological function of miR-192 in colon cancer cells in vitro. First, we assessed the role of miR-192 in stress-induced apoptosis. miR-192 precursor was stably expressed in metastatic HCT116 cells using a retroviral vector. As a result, expression of mature miR-192 is comparable to those in non-metastatic FET cells determined by Q-PCR analysis (Fig. S1A). Luciferase assays revealed that the reporter activity of the plasmid containing the miR-192 recognition element in the 3′-UTR of the luciferase gene was decreased in miR-192-expressing cells as compared to the vector-expressing control cells (Fig. S1B), indicating the suppressive activity of ectopically expressed miR-192 in HCT116 cells.
Although the percentages of cells in G1 and S phase were slightly increased and decreased respectively in miR-192-expressing cells relative to the control cells (Fig. S2), the differences were not statistically significant. However, miR-192-expressing cells displayed significantly increased sensitivity to GFDS-induced apoptosis as reflected by enhanced caspase 3 cleavage as compared to the control cells (Fig. 2A). These observations were further confirmed by DNA fragmentation ELISA assays, which showed 2.5-fold or 80% increase of apoptosis in miR-192-expressing cells when compared to the control cells after exposing to GFDS for one or two days respectively (Fig. 2B, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01). To determine whether miR-192 has similar function in other colon cancer cells, miR-192 was ectopically expressed in RCA cells that show low endogenous miR-192 expression (Fig. 1B). The suppressive activity of exogenous miR-192 was indicated by the decrease of luciferase activity of the miR-192 reporter (pMiRluc-192) (Fig. S3A). Similar to HCT116 cells, there was an increase of cleaved caspase 3 in miR-192-expressing RCA cells under GFDS as compared to the control cells (Fig. 2C), which was confirmed by DNA fragmentation assays showing 45% increase of apoptosis (Fig. 2D, *P < 0.05). Of note, miR-192 mimic showed same effect as stably expressed miR-192 in both cell lines (data not shown). These results indicate that ectopic expression of miR-192 sensitizes colon cancer cells to GFDS-induced apoptosis.
Figure 2. miRNA-192 contributes to GFDS-induced apoptosis.
The miR-192 precursor was overexpressed in HCT116 (A and B) and RCA cells (C and D) and chemically synthesized miR-192 inhibitor (Inh) or negative control (Con) was transfected into FET cells (E and F). Western blot analysis of cleaved caspase 3 or PARP was performed in HCT116 (A), RCA (C) and FET cells (E) under GFDS for indicated time periods. DNA fragmentation assays were performed in HCT116 cells under GFDS for 1 or 2 days (B, *P < 0.01, **P < 0.05), in RCA cells under GFDS for 2 days (D, *P < 0.1) and in FET cells under GFDS for 2 days (F, *P < 0.05). The data are presented as the mean ± SE of triplicate experiments.
To further define the role of miR-192 in cell survival, we used a chemically synthesized miR-192 inhibitor to inhibit its activity. HCT116b cells expressing high levels of endogenous miR-192 were transfected with a miR-192 inhibitor. The inhibitor reduced miR-192 activity in HCT116b cells as indicated by the increase of luciferase activity of the miR-192 reporter (pMiRluc-192) as compared to the control cells (Fig. S3B). Inhibition of miR-192 effectively reduced cleaved caspase 3 and PARP under GFDS (Fig. 2E), which was confirmed by DNA fragmentation assays showing 39% decrease of apoptosis (Fig. 2F, * P < 0.05). These results demonstrate that inhibition of miR-192 confers resistance to GFDS-induced apoptosis.
Expression of miR-192 suppresses liver metastasis in vivo
Since cell survival capacity of cancer cells is an important determinant of metastasis (5;25), we next determined the role of miR-192 in metastatic potential of colon cancer cells in an orthotopic model in vivo. miR-192-expressing (miR-192) or control (vector) HCT116 cells were stably transfected with GFP and characterized in vivo.
In vivo studies showed that animals implanted with HCT116 control or miR-192-expressing cells demonstrated 100% primary tumor growth at the site of implantation (Table I & Fig. 3A, left panel). Although expression of miR-192 resulted in a modest decrease (22%) in primary tumor weight (Fig. 3A, right panel, * P< 0.001), it significantly reduced liver metastasis in the orthotopic model by more than 6 fold as reflected by a reduction of metastatic incidence from 53% to 8% (Table I). The presence of metastatic disease was confirmed by histological analysis (Fig. 3B, lower left panel). Moreover, fluorescence imaging of explanted liver showed that, compared to vector cells, orthotopic implantation of miR-192 cells led to diminished liver metastasis (Fig. 3B, upper panel). Quantification of liver metastatic loci indicated a more than 10 fold decrease in numbers of liver metastases (Fig. 3B, lower right panel, *P < 0.002). These results demonstrate that miR-192 inhibits metastatic colonization in the liver. To determine whether miR-192-mediated apoptosis was associated with metastatic potential in vivo, TUNEL assays were performed. TUNEL staining of primary tumors showed that there were significantly more apoptotic cells in the tumors of miR-192 cells than in those of vector cells (53% vs. 17%, Fig. 3C, * P < 0.001). Meanwhile Ki67 staining showed that tumors of miR-192 cells had fewer proliferative cells than those of vector cells (56% vs. 75%, Fig. 3D, * P < 0.001). Furthermore, when we examined angiogenesis in the primary tumors, we found that vascular formation in the primary tumors of miR-192 cells was much lower than that in the primary tumors of vector cells as reflected by CD 31 staining (Fig. 3E, upper panel). Quantification of the density of CD31 staining (Fig. 3E, lower left panel) and numbers of CD31 positive cells (Fig. 3E, lower right panel) showed a 2.8 fold (* P < 0.03) and a 1.7 fold (* P < 0.02) difference between two groups of primary tumors respectively. These results indicate that the inhibitory effect of miR-192 on metastasis was not simply a result of its effect on suppression of tumor cell proliferation but also a result of its inhibition of survival of tumor cells and their capacity to develop angiogenesis. Taken together, these in vivo results demonstrate an important suppressive role of miR-192 in metastatic formation at distant organ sites.
Table 1.
miR-192 significantly reduces liver metastasis
| Primary Tumors | Liver Metastasis | |
|---|---|---|
| Vector | 100% (19/19) | 53% (10/19) |
| miR-192 | 100% (26/26) | 8% (2/26) |
Figure 3. Expression of miR-192 suppresses liver metastasis in an orthotopic model.

A, GFP images (left panel) and weight (right panel, * P < 0.001) of primary tumors are shown. B, GFP images of liver metastasis (upper panel) and H&E staining of liver metastasis are shown in the lower left panel. The arrow indicates cancer cells in the liver. Numbers of liver metastatic loci were counted and compared between mice bearing HCT116 vector control cells and HCT116 cells expressing miR-192. *P < 0.002 (lower right panel). C and D, Images of TUNEL (C, 20x magnification) and Ki67 (D, 40x magnification) staining of primary tumors are shown in the left panels. The images are representative of multiple fields of tumor sections from 6 tumors per group. Numbers of positive TUNEL (C) and Ki67 (D) staining cells were determined as described in Materials and Methods. The data are presented as the mean ± SE. *P < 0.001 (right panels). E, Images of IHC staining of CD31 in primary tumors are shown in the upper panel. Staining density and number of vessels were measured and quantified as described in Materials and Methods. The data are presented as the mean ± SE. * P < 0.03 (lower panel).
miR-192 directly or indirectly regulates expression of pro-metastatic genes
The ability of miR-192 to impede multiple steps of the cancer metastasis cascade might be attributed to its ability to regulate expression of genes involved in diverse aspects of metastatic dissemination. To identify effectors of miR-192, we used several algorithms that predict the mRNA targets of miRNAs – TargetScan (26), PicTar (27) and miRanda-mirSVR (28). Based on the representation of miR-192 sites in their 3′ UTRs and their implicated role in tumor progression, we chose the top ten target genes to perform further studies. Three of the ten genes studied (Bcl-2, Zeb2 and VEGFA) showed reduced expression in HCT116 cells expressing miR-192 as compared to vector control cells (Fig. 4A, 4C & 4E, left panels). To determine whether they are direct targets of miR-192, we cloned the 3′ UTRs of Bcl-2, Zeb2 or VEGFA containing the potential miR-192 recognition element into a luciferase construct described above. Reporter assays revealed that miR-192 repressed the UTRs of Bcl-2 and Zeb2, but not of VEGFA (Fig. 4A, * P < 0.001, 4C, * P < 0.01 & 4E, right panels,). This indicates that expression of Bcl-2 and Zeb2 are directly regulated by miR-192, whereas VEGFA could be an indirect target of miR-192.
Figure 4. miR-192 directly or indirectly regulates expression of Bcl2, Zeb2 and VEGFA.

A, C and E, Bcl2 mRNA and protein (A), Zeb2 mRNA (C) and VEGFA protein (E) were determined in HCT116 control and miR-192-expressing cells (left panels). Luciferase constructs were co-transfected into HCT116 cells with β-gal expression vector. Luciferase activity was normalized to β-gal activity. The data are presented as mean ± SE of triplicate experiments (right panels). * P < 0.001 (A), * P < 0.01 (C). B, Bcl2 was ectopically expressed in HCT116 control and miR-192-expressing cells. Western blot analysis of cleaved caspase 3 was performed. D, Expression of E-cadherin was determined in HCT116 control and miR-192-expressing cells (upper panel). Expression of E-cadherin was determined in HCT116 control (Scr) and Zeb2-knocked down (shZeb2) cells (lower panel).
Given the role of Bcl-2 in cell survival, we next determined whether miR-192 mediated induction of apoptosis under GFDS could be reversed by restoration of Bcl-2 expression. Bcl-2 cDNA was introduced into miR-192-expressing HCT116 cells. Ectopically expressed Bcl-2 is resistant to down-regulation mediated by miR-192 due to the lack of 3′ UTR. Restoration of Bcl-2 expression partially rescued miR-192-expressing cells from GFDS-induced apoptosis as reflected by reduced caspase 3 cleavage (Fig. 4B), indicating that miR-192 mediates cell survival partially through regulation of Bcl-2 expression.
Zeb2 is a master transcriptional factor involved in EMT, one of the important determinants of metastasis. Zeb2 has been shown to promote EMT through suppressing expression of E-cadherin (29;30). In miR-192-expressing HCT116 cells, expression of E-cadherin increased as compared to the control cells (Fig. 4D, upper panel), which is consistent with reduced expression of Zeb2 in those cells (Fig. 4C, left panel). When Zeb2 expression was knocked down by Zeb2-specific shRNAs in HCT116 cells, E-cadherin expression increased (Fig. 4D, lower panel). These results indicate that miR-192 up-regulates E-cadherin expression through down-regulating Zeb2 expression.
miR-192 inhibits expression of its target genes in vivo
To determine whether miR-192 represses expression of Bcl-2, Zeb2 or VEGFA in vivo, we examined their expression in the primary tumors of mice implanted with vector- or miR-192-expressing HCT116 cells described above. IHC staining revealed that expression of Bcl-2 and VEGFA was significantly reduced in the primary tumors of miR-192-expressing cells as compared to those of the control cells (Fig. 5A & 5B, *P < 0.001), which likely contributes to the differences observed in apoptosis (TUNEL, Fig. 3C) and angiogenesis (CD31, Fig. 3E) respectively between these two groups. In addition, a remarkable reduction of Zeb2 expression, especially in the nucleus, was also detected in the primary tumors of miR-192 cells when compared to the control tumors (Fig. 5C, *P < 0.001). Consequently, an increase of membrane expression of E-cadherin was observed in those tumors (Fig. 5D, *P < 0.001). These results indicate that miR-192 inhibits expression of Bcl-2, VEGFA and Zeb2 in the primary tumors, combination of which contributes to diminished liver metastasis in the orthotopic model.
Figure 5. miR-192 inhibits expression of its target genes in vivo.

Images of IHC staining of Bcl2 (A), VEGFA (B), Zeb2 (C) and E-cadherin (D) in primary tumors are shown in the upper panels. Staining density was measured and quantified as described in Materials and Methods. The data are presented as the mean ± SE. * P < 0.001 (lower panels).
miR-192 is differentially expressed in human colon tumors at different stages
To demonstrate the clinical relevance of miR-192 expression in human colon cancer, we extended our analyses by assaying miR-192 expression in human colonic adenocarcinoma specimens. RNA was isolated from sections prepared from 24 normal colon and 29 individual colon cancer patients at stages I, II or IV. As shown in Figure 6A, quantitative real-time PCR assays demonstrated that expression of miR-192 in normal colonic epithelial cells was statistically higher than that in adenocarcinomas of stages I (** P < 0.004), II and IV (*** P < 0.001). Importantly, there was a significant decrease of miR-192 expression in stage IV tumors as compared to those of stages I (* P < 0.02) or II (*** P < 0.001). Expression of miR-192 in individual tissue samples is shown in Figure 6B. These results indicate that expression of miR-192 decreases early in colon cancer development and further decreases during colon cancer progression. Taken together with in vitro and in vivo results in colon cancer cells, our studies demonstrate that miR-192 plays an important role in colon cancer development and progression. In addition, the stage-dependent decrease of miR-192 expression suggests that miR-192 expression could be used as a potential biomarker to predict metastasis in colon cancer patients.
Figure 6. Expression of miR-192 in human colon cancer specimens.

A, RNA samples prepared from 24 normal colon and 29 individual colon cancer patient specimens at different stages were used to determine miR-192 expression as described in Materials and Methods. The data are presented as the mean ± SE. * P < 0.02, ** P < 0.004, *** P < 0.001. B, Expression of miR-192 in individual tissue samples is shown. Bars indicate mean values of each group of samples.
Evaluate expression of Bcl-2, VEGFA and Zeb2 in human specimens
To determine whether the target genes of miR-192 show an inverse pattern of expression in human specimens, we examined expression of Bcl-2, VEGFA and Zeb2 in tissue samples from normal colon and colon cancer patients at stage I or stage IV. IHC staining revealed that expression of Bcl-2, VEGFA and Zeb2 in adenocarcinomas of stage I and stage IV was statistically higher than that in normal colonic epithelial cells (Fig. 7, * P < 0.02, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001). In addition, their expression further increased in stage IV tumors compared to those of stage I (Fig. 7, * P < 0.02, ** P < 0.01). These results indicate an inverse relationship between expression of miR-192 and its target genes in human specimens.
Figure 7. Expression of Bcl-2, VEGFA and Zeb2 in human colon cancer specimens.

IHC staining of Bcl2 (A), VEGFA (B) and Zeb2 (C) was performed in normal colon and colon cancer patient specimens at stages I and IV. Staining density was measured and quantified as described in Materials and Methods. The data are presented as the mean ± SE. * P < 0.02, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.
DISCUSSION
Metastasis has been associated with resistance to stress-induced apoptosis that can be attributed to aberrant survival capacity of cancer cells (5;25). Therefore, inducing cell death has become an important therapeutic strategy to treat metastasis. We have demonstrated in this study that miR-192 decreases cell survival capacity under stress by inhibiting expression of Bcl-2 (Fig. 4A & 4B). In addition, since environmental restriction on growth is very common in solid tumors, a mechanism that enables increased angiogenesis to provide sufficient nutrients and oxygen would be highly advantageous to malignant cells. VEGFA is a potent angiogenic factor that plays an essential role in cancer. We show here that, miR-192 suppresses expression of VEGFA and as a consequence, reduces angiogenesis in vivo (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, EMT has been shown to contribute to metastasis and Zeb2 is an important regulator of EMT. Our studies indicate that Zeb2 is a direct target of miR-192 and that miR-192 increases E-cadherin expression through decreasing Zeb2 expression (Fig. 4C & 4D). Thus, the concomitant suppression of Bcl-2, VEGFA and Zeb2 by miR-192 could decrease metastatic potential by regulating multiple steps of the metastasis cascade. In support of this view, when tested in an in vivo orthotopic model that recapitulates the pattern of colorectal cancer metastases in humans, miR-192 inhibits metastatic colonization in the liver (Table I & Fig. 3B). Taken together, our studies indicate that reduced cell survival, angiogenesis and EMT conferred by miR-192 contribute to diminished metastasis of colon cancer cells in vivo.
TGFβ plays an important role in tumorigenesis and metastasis. We and others have demonstrated that TGFβ suppresses tumor initiation in a variety of cancers including colon cancer (31–34). However, the role of TGFβ signaling in metastasis has been controversial. Although many studies show that TGFβ promotes EMT and metastasis (35;36), others demonstrate that TGFβ suppresses metastasis (37;38). Our previous studies indicate that loss of TGFβ signaling is associated with increased metastasis, whereas enhanced TGFβ signaling suppresses metastasis in an orthotopic model of colon cancer (19), indicating a metastasis suppressor function of TGFβ in a subset of colon cancer cells. Given the anti-metastatic role of miR-192, TGFβ might suppress metastasis through induction of miR-192 and subsequent suppression of pro-metastatic Bcl-2, VEGFA and Zeb2 in those cells. On the other hand, TGFβ might promote EMT and/or metastasis by down-regulating miR-192 expression in other cell models in which TGFβ acts as a EMT promoter (39;40). We have previously shown that TGFβ signaling suppresses tumor formation and metastasis through many different mechanisms including inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis (19;31). Our current studies further highlight the importance of TGFβ regulatory pathway in colon cancer progression and may provide another important and novel mechanistic basis for TGFβ-mediated suppression of metastasis. The frequent loss of TGFβ signaling, which occurs in 30–50% of colon cancer patients (41;42), may account for one of the mechanisms underlying reduced expression of miR-192 in colon cancer patients (Fig. 6).
High levels of Bcl-2 expression in primary colon cancer have been associated with over 60% of the cases at the time of diagnosis (43). The regulation of Bcl-2 messenger RNA is critical in the development of cancer (44). Our study suggests that miRNA-mediated modulation is an additional mechanism for Bcl-2 expression in colon cancer. Of note, in addition to miR-192, a recent study shows that Bcl-2 expression can be repressed by miR-15 and miR-16 to induce apoptosis (45). Similar to Bcl-2, expression of VEGFA is increased in colon cancer and is associated with disease localization, stage and long-term disease-specific survival (46). It has been shown that expression of VEGFA is mainly regulated at the transcriptional and translational levels (47;48). Recent studies indicate that VEGFA expression can also be regulated by miRNAs at the posttranscriptional level (49). Our current findings that miR-192 suppresses VEGFA expression suggest that miRNA-mediated posttranscriptional regulation could be a novel mechanism for the up-regulation of VEGFA expression in colon cancer. Moreover, overexpression of Zeb2 at the invasion front correlates with tumor progression and predicts cancer-specific survival in primary colorectal cancer (50). The miR-200 family has been reported to regulate Zeb1 and Zeb2 expression (51;52). Zeb2 has been previously shown to be a target of miR-192 (53;54). Our results confirm that miR-192 is another miRNA whose reduced expression could contribute to overexpression of Zeb2 in cancer. Given that miRNA targets can also be regulated by other mechanisms, it is conceivable to observe a tissue- or context-specific effect of miRNAs. miR-192 has been shown to suppress ALCAM expression in gastric cancer cells (55). However, we did not detect any effect of miR-192 on ALCAM expression in colon cancer cells (data not shown).
Although miR-192 has been shown to be down-regulated in colorectal cancer (22;23), it is not clear whether expression of miR-192 differs in cancer patients at different stages. We showed here that expression of miR-192 in normal colonic epithelia cells is statistically higher than that in adenocarcinomas of stages I, II and IV, and that there is a significant reduction of miR-192 expression in stage IV tumors as compared to those of stages I or II (Fig. 6). Consistently, expression of Bcl-2, VEGFA and Zeb2 shows an inverse pattern relative to miR-192 expression in human specimens (Fig. 7). Therefore, our findings underscore the clinical relevance and prognostic significance of miR-192 expression in colon cancer. Bcl-2, VEGFA and Zeb2 may play a key role in colon cancer progression driven by the loss of miR-192. However, there are hundreds of genes regulated by a single miRNA. It is likely that miR-192 can target other oncogenes relevant to colon cancer.
Our studies may have therapeutic significance for treatment of colon cancer metastases. Much effort has been made to pharmacologically target Bcl-2, including development of Bcl-2 antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotide compound, modified peptides and small molecular inhibitors (56;57). Avastin, a monoclonal antibody directed against VEGFA, has been widely used with chemotherapy to treat metastatic colon cancer with improved efficacy (58). However, some patients eventually develop resistance to the treatment (59). The restoration of miR-192 could be theoretically more effective, due to the simultaneous inhibition of Bcl-2, VEGFA, Zeb2 and other possible targets. In our experimental models, re-expression of miR-192 in colon cancer cells was able to significantly suppress their metastatic potential. Thus, although colon cancer is extremely heterogeneous in the clinical setting, miR-192 may have considerable therapeutic potential, either as single agent or in combination with other therapeutic drugs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell Lines and Reagents
The human colon carcinoma HCT116, RCA, HCT116b and FET cell lines were cultured in McCoy’s 5A serum-free medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10ng/ml epidermal growth factor, 20ug/ml insulin, and 4ug/ml transferrin (60). When cells were under growth factor and nutrient deprivation stress, they were cultured in the medium in the absence of growth factor or serum supplements. Recombinant human TGFβ1 and miScript miR-192 inhibitor were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) and Qiagen (Netherlands) respectively. The sources of antibodies for western blot analyses are: caspase-3, PARP and phosphorylated AKT (Ser473), Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA), Bcl2 and VEGFA, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc (Santa Cruz, CA), actin, Sigma (St. Louis, MO), E-cadherin, a gift from Dr. Masatoshi Takeichi.
RT-PCR and Q-PCR
For RT-PCR, 2 μg of RNA was reverse-transcribed with M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI) using a random primer. 2ul of cDNA product was used to amplify human Bcl2 and Zeb2. Primer sequences for Bcl2 were 5′-ATCAAGTGTTCCGCGTGATT-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGCTGGCTGGACATCTCG-3′ (reverse) and for Zeb2 were 5′-CGGCATATGGTGACACACAA-3′ (forward) and 5′-CACCTAAGTGCTGCATTGGA-3′ (reverse). miR-192 expression was determined by Taqman microRNA assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). U6 was used as an endogenous reference gene.
Luciferase assays
The miR-192 binding site was synthesized and cloned into an Ambion® pMIR-REPORT™ vector to generate pMiRluc-192. 3′UTRs of Bcl2, Zeb2 and VEGFA containing miR-192 binding sites were amplified and cloned into the same vector to generate pMiRluc-Bcl2, -Zeb2 and -VEGFA respectively. The reporter was co-transfected with a cytomegalovirus β-galactosidase vector using FuGENE HD (Roche, Boulder, CO). Luciferase activity was measured 48 hours later using luciferase reporter assay (Promega, Madison, WI). Values were normalized with β-galactosidase activity. Statistical analyses were performed using the Student’s t test.
Plasmid, retroviral infection and apoptosis assays
cDNA encoding miR-192 precursor (~300bp) was cloned into a retroviral expression vector and transduced into colon cancer cells. Cells were deprived of serum and growth factors for the indicated time (0 – 2 days). Apoptosis was detected using a DNA fragmentation ELISA kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Statistical analyses were performed using the Student’s t test.
In Vivo Orthotopic Model
Experiments involving animals were approved by the University of Nebraska Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Orthotopic implantation was performed as previously described (61). Briefly, GFP-labeled cells (2 × 106) were directly injected to the subserosal layer of the cecum of male athymic nude mice (4–5 weeks old). Mice were euthanized between 4–5 weeks. Cecal tumors and livers were dissected out and washed with cold PBS. GFP imaging was performed using Illumatool Light Source (Japan).
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Staining
Formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks of primary tumors were stained for TUNEL, Ki67, CD31, Bcl2, VEGFA and Zeb2 expression. Terminal nucleotidyltransferase-mediated nick end labeling (TUNEL) assays was performed using ApopTag Peroxidase In Situ Oligo Ligation Apoptosis Detection Kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA). The sources of primary antibodies used for IHC are: Ki67 (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), CD31 (Abcam, Cambridge, England), Bcl2, VEGFA and Zeb2/SIP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and E-cadherin (a gift from Dr. Masatoshi Takeichi). Tissue slides were subjected to antigen retrieval using Novocastra Epitope Retrieval Solutions, pH6 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), followed by incubation with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. To neutralize endogenous peroxidase, Dako Dual Endogenous Enzyme Block (DAKO, Danmark) was used for all the markers except for Zeb2. For CD31 and VEGFA, the secondary antibody was Envision Flex HRP labeled Polymer Anti-Rabbit (DAKO). A biotin goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (BD Pharmingen) was used for Ki67, Bcl2 and E-cadherin followed by incubation with Streptavidin-Horseradish-Peroxidase (SAv-HRP, BD Pharmingen). For Zeb2, Ultravision LP Detection System (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) was used.
Apoptosis and proliferation were determined quantitatively by counting the numbers of positively stained cells for TUNEL and Ki67 at 20x and 40x magnification respectively. Staining density of CD31, Bcl2, VEGFA, Zeb2 and E-cadherin was quantified with ImagePro plus 7.0 Software. Six animals were analyzed for each cell type. Ten histologically similar fields were randomly selected from each slide for analysis. P values were calculated using Student’s t-test.
Detection of expression of miR-192 and its target genes in human tissue samples
FFPE blocks of normal human colon removed for reasons other than malignancy and those containing invasive colonic adenocarcinomas were obtained from files of Department of Pathology and Microbiology at University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC). The ages of all patients (including both men and women) were between 55–85 years. The cancer patients did not receive neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical removal of the tumors. The study was performed with the approval of the ethics committee (Institutional Review Board) of UNMC.
The FFPE slides were deparaffinized using histoclear and rehydrated following hematoxylene staining to identify the normal crypt and tumor areas under the microscope. The normal crypt or tumor areas were then scrapped with a fine scalpel and collected into an eppendorf tube. RNA was extracted using the miRNeasy FFPE kit (Qiagen). For Q-PCR, 50 ng of RNA was reverse-transcribed using QuantiTect Reverse Transcriptase kit (Qiagen). 2.5 μl of cDNA product was used to amplify miR-192 using StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). U6 was used as an internal control. Expression of Bcl-2, VEGFA and Zeb2 was determined by IHC staining as described above.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH/NCI funding R01CA140988-01 and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (LB506) 2013-40 to JW.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yokota J. Tumor progression and metastasis. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:497–503. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.3.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fidler IJ. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:453–8. doi: 10.1038/nrc1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mehlen P, Puisieux A. Metastasis: a question of life or death. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:449–58. doi: 10.1038/nrc1886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Inbal B, Cohen O, Polak-Charcon S, Kopolovic J, Vadai E, Eisenbach L, et al. DAP kinase links the control of apoptosis to metastasis. Nature. 1997;390:180–4. doi: 10.1038/36599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stoeltzing O, Liu W, Reinmuth N, Parikh A, Ahmad SA, Jung YD, et al. Angiogenesis and antiangiogenic therapy of colon cancer liver metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:722–33. doi: 10.1245/aso.2003.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meng F, Wu G. The rejuvenated scenario of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012;31:455–67. doi: 10.1007/s10555-012-9379-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Du T, Zamore PD. microPrimer: the biogenesis and function of microRNA. Development. 2005;132:4645–52. doi: 10.1242/dev.02070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Calin GA, Sevignani C, Dumitru CD, Hyslop T, Noch E, Yendamuri S, et al. Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:2999–3004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307323101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang B, Pan X, Cobb GP, Anderson TA. microRNAs as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Dev Biol. 2007;302:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Calin GA, Liu CG, Sevignani C, Ferracin M, Felli N, Dumitru CD, et al. MicroRNA profiling reveals distinct signatures in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:11755–60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404432101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:857–66. doi: 10.1038/nrc1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fang L, Du WW, Yang W, Rutnam ZJ, Peng C, Li H, et al. MiR-93 enhances angiogenesis and metastasis by targeting LATS2. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:4352–65. doi: 10.4161/cc.22670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Majid S, Dar AA, Saini S, Shahryari V, Arora S, Zaman MS, et al. MicroRNA-1280 Inhibits Invasion and Metastasis by Targeting ROCK1 in Bladder Cancer. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e46743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tian Q, Liang L, Ding J, Zha R, Shi H, Wang Q, et al. MicroRNA-550a Acts as a Pro-Metastatic Gene and Directly Targets Cytoplasmic Polyadenylation Element-Binding Protein 4 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e48958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vandewalle C, Comijn J, De Craene B, Vermassen P, Bruyneel E, Andersen H, et al. SIP1/ZEB2 induces EMT by repressing genes of different epithelial cell-cell junctions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:6566–78. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Simms N, Rajput A, Sharratt EA, Ongchin M, Teggart CA, Wang J, et al. Transforming growth factor-ss suppresses metastasis in a subset of human colon carcinoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:221. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jiang Y, Liu XQ, Rajput A, Geng L, Ongchin M, Zeng Q, et al. Phosphatase PRL-3 is a direct regulatory target of TGFbeta in colon cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2011;71:234–44. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kato M, Putta S, Wang M, Yuan H, Lanting L, Nair I, et al. TGF-beta activates Akt kinase through a microRNA-dependent amplifying circuit targeting PTEN. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:881–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb1897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schetter AJ, Leung SY, Sohn JJ, Zanetti KA, Bowman ED, Yanaihara N, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles associated with prognosis and therapeutic outcome in colon adenocarcinoma. JAMA. 2008;299:425–36. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.4.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chiang Y, Song Y, Wang Z, Liu Z, Gao P, Liang J, et al. microRNA-192, -194 and -215 are frequently downregulated in colorectal cancer. Exp Ther Med. 2012;3:560–6. doi: 10.3892/etm.2011.436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu XQ, Rajput A, Geng L, Ongchin M, Chaudhuri A, Wang J. Restoration of transforming growth factor-beta receptor II expression in colon cancer cells with microsatellite instability increases metastatic potential in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:16082–90. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.221697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 25.Mehrotra S, Languino LR, Raskett CM, Mercurio AM, Dohi T, Altieri DC. IAP regulation of metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Grimson A, Farh KK, Johnston WK, Garrett-Engele P, Lim LP, Bartel DP. MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol Cell. 2007;27:91–105. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Krek A, Grun D, Poy MN, Wolf R, Rosenberg L, Epstein EJ, et al. Combinatorial microRNA target predictions. Nat Genet. 2005;37:495–500. doi: 10.1038/ng1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Betel D, Koppal A, Agius P, Sander C, Leslie C. Comprehensive modeling of microRNA targets predicts functional non-conserved and non-canonical sites. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R90. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G, Kang Y. The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:14910–4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800074200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Park SM, Gaur AB, Lengyel E, Peter ME. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 2008;22:894–907. doi: 10.1101/gad.1640608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang J, Han W, Zborowska E, Liang J, Wang X, Willson JK, et al. Reduced expression of transforming growth factor beta type I receptor contributes to the malignancy of human colon carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:17366–71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ye SC, Foster JM, Li W, Liang J, Zborowska E, Venkateswarlu S, et al. Contextual effects of transforming growth factor beta on the tumorigenicity of human colon carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 1999;59:4725–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang J, Sun L, Myeroff L, Wang X, Gentry LE, Yang J, et al. Demonstration that mutation of the type II transforming growth factor beta receptor inactivates its tumor suppressor activity in replication error-positive colon carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:22044–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.37.22044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Markowitz S, Wang J, Myeroff L, Parsons R, Sun L, Lutterbaugh J, et al. Inactivation of the type II TGF-beta receptor in colon cancer cells with microsatellite instability. Science. 1995;268:1336–8. doi: 10.1126/science.7761852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhao S, Venkatasubbarao K, Lazor JW, Sperry J, Jin C, Cao L, et al. Inhibition of STAT3 Tyr705 phosphorylation by Smad4 suppresses transforming growth factor beta-mediated invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4221–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zubeldia IG, Bleau AM, Redrado M, Serrano D, Agliano A, Gil-Puig C, et al. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell phenotypes leading to liver metastasis are abrogated by the novel TGFbeta1-targeting peptides P17 and P144. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319:12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Forrester E, Chytil A, Bierie B, Aakre M, Gorska AE, Sharif-Afshar AR, et al. Effect of conditional knockout of the type II TGF-beta receptor gene in mammary epithelia on mammary gland development and polyomavirus middle T antigen induced tumor formation and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2296–302. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yang L, Huang J, Ren X, Gorska AE, Chytil A, Aakre M, et al. Abrogation of TGF beta signaling in mammary carcinomas recruits Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells that promote metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kriegel AJ, Fang Y, Liu Y, Tian Z, Mladinov D, Matus IR, et al. MicroRNA-target pairs in human renal epithelial cells treated with transforming growth factor beta 1: a novel role of miR-382. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:8338–47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Krupa A, Jenkins R, Luo DD, Lewis A, Phillips A, Fraser D. Loss of MicroRNA-192 promotes fibrogenesis in diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:438–47. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009050530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Salovaara R, Roth S, Loukola A, Launonen V, Sistonen P, Avizienyte E, et al. Frequent loss of SMAD4/DPC4 protein in colorectal cancers. Gut. 2002;51:56–9. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.1.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Grady WM, Myeroff LL, Swinler SE, Rajput A, Thiagalingam S, Lutterbaugh JD, et al. Mutational inactivation of transforming growth factor beta receptor type II in microsatellite stable colon cancers. Cancer Res. 1999;59:320–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Karakas T, Maurer U, Weidmann E, Miething CC, Hoelzer D, Bergmann L. High expression of bcl-2 mRNA as a determinant of poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Oncol. 1998;9:159–65. doi: 10.1023/a:1008255511404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Agui T, McConkey DJ, Tanigawa N. Comparative study of various biological parameters, including expression of survivin, between primary and metastatic human colonic adenocarcinomas. Anticancer Res. 2002;22:1769–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cimmino A, Calin GA, Fabbri M, Iorio MV, Ferracin M, Shimizu M, et al. miR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:13944–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506654102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bendardaf R, Buhmeida A, Hilska M, Laato M, Syrjanen S, Syrjanen K, et al. VEGF-1 expression in colorectal cancer is associated with disease localization, stage, and long-term disease-specific survival. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:3865–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Akiri G, Nahari D, Finkelstein Y, Le SY, Elroy-Stein O, Levi BZ. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression is mediated by internal initiation of translation and alternative initiation of transcription. Oncogene. 1998;17:227–36. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Forsythe JA, Jiang BH, Iyer NV, Agani F, Leung SW, Koos RD, et al. Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:4604–13. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.9.4604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yue X, Wang P, Xu J, Zhu Y, Sun G, Pang Q, et al. MicroRNA-205 functions as a tumor suppressor in human glioblastoma cells by targeting VEGF-A. Oncol Rep. 2012;27:1200–6. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kahlert C, Lahes S, Radhakrishnan P, Dutta S, Mogler C, Herpel E, et al. Overexpression of ZEB2 at the invasion front of colorectal cancer is an independent prognostic marker and regulates tumor invasion in vitro. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:7654–63. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G, Kang Y. The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:14910–4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800074200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Park SM, Gaur AB, Lengyel E, Peter ME. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 2008;22:894–907. doi: 10.1101/gad.1640608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kim T, Veronese A, Pichiorri F, Lee TJ, Jeon YJ, Volinia S, et al. p53 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition through microRNAs targeting ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Exp Med. 2011;208:875–83. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wang B, Herman-Edelstein M, Koh P, Burns W, Jandeleit-Dahm K, Watson A, et al. E-cadherin expression is regulated by miR-192/215 by a mechanism that is independent of the profibrotic effects of transforming growth factor-beta. Diabetes. 2010;59:1794–802. doi: 10.2337/db09-1736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jin Z, Selaru FM, Cheng Y, Kan T, Agarwal R, Mori Y, et al. MicroRNA-192 and -215 are upregulated in human gastric cancer in vivo and suppress ALCAM expression in vitro. Oncogene. 2011;30:1577–85. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kang MH, Reynolds CP. Bcl-2 inhibitors: targeting mitochondrial apoptotic pathways in cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:1126–32. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Moreira JN, Santos A, Simoes S. Bcl-2-targeted antisense therapy (Oblimersen sodium): towards clinical reality. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2006;1:217–35. doi: 10.2174/157488706778250050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Klinger M, Tamandl D, Eipeldauer S, Hacker S, Herberger B, Kaczirek K, et al. Bevacizumab improves pathological response of colorectal cancer liver metastases treated with XELOX/FOLFOX. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2059–65. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0972-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tejpar S, Prenen H, Mazzone M. Overcoming Resistance to Antiangiogenic Therapies. Oncologist. 2012 doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Boyd DD, Levine AE, Brattain DE, McKnight MK, Brattain MG. Comparison of growth requirements of two human intratumoral colon carcinoma cell lines in monolayer and soft agarose. Cancer Res. 1988;48:2469–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yokoi K, Thaker PH, Yazici S, Rebhun RR, Nam DH, He J, et al. Dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor phosphorylation by AEE788 reduces growth and metastasis of human colon carcinoma in an orthotopic nude mouse model. Cancer Res. 2005;65:3716–25. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

