Skip to main content
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters logoLink to ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
. 2011 Apr 7;2(7):519–522. doi: 10.1021/ml200050s

Assessment of Partially Deoxygenated Deoxynojirimycin Derivatives as Glucosylceramide Synthase Inhibitors

Richard J B H N van den Berg , Tom Wennekes , Amar Ghisaidoobe , Wilma E Donker-Koopman , Anneke Strijland , Rolf G Boot , Gijsbert A van der Marel , Johannes M F G Aerts ‡,*, Herman S Overkleeft †,*
PMCID: PMC4018170  PMID: 24900342

Abstract

graphic file with name ml-2011-00050s_0002.jpg

Glucosylceramide synthase (GCS) is an approved drug target for the treatment of Gaucher disease and is considered as a valid target for combating other human pathologies, including type 2 diabetes. The clinical drug N-butyldeoxynojirimycin (Zavesca) is thought to inhibit through mimicry of its substrate, ceramide. In this work we demonstrate that, in contrast to what is proposed in this model, the C2-hydroxyl of the deoxynojirimycin core is important for GCS inhibition. Here we show that C6-OH appears of less important, which may set guidelines for the development of GCS inhibitors that have less affinity (in comparison with Zavesca) for other glycoprocessing enzymes, in particular those hydrolases that act on glucosylceramide.

Keywords: Glucosylceramide synthase, iminosugar, Gaucher disease, ceramide, deoxynojirimycin


Glucosylceramide synthase (GCS) is a noncanonical glycosyl transferase in several aspects. Situated at the outer membrane of the Golgi apparatus, GCS catalyzes the transfer of glucose from UDP-glucose to ceramide to give glucosylceramide.1 As such, and with the exception of the enzyme O-GlcNAc transferase,2 GCS is the only mammalian glycosyltransferase known to act in cytoplasm. GCS appears evolutionary distinct from most other glycosyltransferases, that all act either in the ER or the Golgi apparatus. Although little structural data on GCS exists (the enzyme has, to date, defied attempts to gather Röntgen diffraction data), alignment of the primary sequence reveals large differences between GCS and other glycosyl transferases.1 Perhaps thanks to these differences, potent GCS inhibitors of various signatures have been described, whereas for most other glycosyltransferases no effective inhibitors are available. In fact, the discovery that GCS is susceptible to inhibition by small compounds has led to the development of N-butyl-deoxynojirimycin as a drug (Zavesca (1); Figure 1) for the treatment of the lysosomal glycolipid storage disorder Gaucher disease.35 Compound 1 is a moderately potent and selective GCS inhibitor. Treatment of mildly affected type 1 Gaucher patients with this agent results in sufficient pharmacological lowering of glucosylceramide to levels that the residual mutant glucosylceramidase (GBA1) can deal with.6 We have reported on the development of much more potent (for instance, 2) and also more selective with respect to other glycoprocessing enzymes (for instance, 3) N-alkylated deoxynojirimycin derivatives.7,8 Coinciding with these discoveries, recent studies strongly point toward GCS as a therapeutic target in several diseases areas: next to lysosomal glycolipid storage disorders other than Gaucher, also type 2 diabetes, hepatosteatosis, artherosclerosis, inflammatory diseases, and polycystic kidney disease.914 The development of GCS inhibitors with improved properties therefore remains a valid research objective.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Known glucosylceramide synthase inhibitors (13) and the target compounds discussed in this study.

Perhaps most remarkably from an enzymology point of view is not so much that GCS inhibitors exist but that these include iminosugar-type piperidines. Iminosugars are widely pursued and versatile glycosidase inhibitors, and iminosugars acting on exoglycosidases processing many different glycosides (varying for instance in preference for the configuration of the substrate glycoside: glucosidases, mannosidases, galactosidases, etc) are known.1518 In contrast, and with the said exception of GCS, glycosyltransferases are normally insensitive toward this class of compounds.19,20 Deoxynojirimycin-type iminosugars are thought to inhibit glycosidases through substrate-or-transition state mimicry. In such models, the basic ring nitrogen in its protonated form is thought to mimic the developing oxocarbenium ion through which glycoside hydrolysis occurs. The configuration of the iminosugar emulates that of the parent sugar and guides both glycosidase inhibitory potency and selectivity. In general, glycosidases are rather particular with respect to their substrate glycoside. Remarkably, GCS appears much less biased with respect to the configuration of the (N-alkylated) iminosugar. We, and others, have demonstrated that at least three configurational deoxynojirimycin isomers are recognized by GCS: next to the d-gluco- and l-ido configurations (as in 2 and 3, respectively), also the d-galacto configuration.2,2124

The relative lack of configurational specificity of GCS toward iminosugars invites the hypothesis that N-alkylated deoxynojirimycin derivatives act not by glucose (or UDP-glucose) mimicry but by another molecular mechanism. Indeed, Butters and co-workers in their work on the development of Zavesca proposed a model in which N-butyldeoxynojirimycin binds to GCS as a mimic of its other substrate, namely, ceramide.25 In this model the ring-nitrogen in 1 superimposes the ceramide nitrogen, with the alkyl (butyl) chain situated at the ceramide N-acyl side. The piperidine O3 and O4 and possibly O6 (glucopyranose numbering) would occupy the positions occupied by the primary and secondary hydroxyls of the ceramide structure. The experimental finding that compound 1 is competitive for ceramide but not UDP-glucose, binding to GCS, supports this model.25 However, no structural evidence for the model has been obtained yet. We decided to put the model to the test in an attempt to design new and potentially selective GCS inhibitors. The model as proposed by Butters and co-workers suggests that, of the deoxynojirimycin substituents, C3-OH and C4-OH and possibly C6-OH are important contributors to GCS binding, whereas the presence of C2-OH is not required. In other words, 2-deoxy-DNM derivatives C should potentially inhibit GCS whereas 2,3-dideoxy derivatives B should not. In order to validate this reasoning, we set out to synthesize all configurational isomers of scaffolds B and C. We either left the secondary nitrogen unmodified (to obtain the respective deoxygenated analogues of the natural product, deoxynojirimycin), introduced a butyl group (enabling comparison with the clinically applied drug, Zavesca), or introduced an adamantanemethyloxypentyl group (to allow a head-to-head comparison with our lead structures, 2 and 3). The synthetic schemes through which the compounds are prepared follow well-established literature procedures (see the experimental section for full experimental and analytical details2630). These routes proceed through partially unsaturated piperidine intermediates, and we capitalized on this by also preparing piperidine derivatives A. In all, we assembled a 48 compound library, which we assessed on inhibitory potential against GCS,31 GBA1,32 the nonlysosomal glucosylceramidase GBA2,33 as well as a selection of intestinal glycosidases.24 The results are summarized in the below Table.

As can be seen (Table 1), none of the 48 compounds possessed any inhibitory potency against GCS at concentrations up to 20 μM. This result stands in contrast to the strong (IC50 0.1–0.2 μM) inhibitory potency as exerted by lead compounds 2 and 3 toward the target enzyme. While these results do not necessarily negate the proposed mode of action by which N-butyldeoxynojirimycin inhibits GCS, they do indicate that one should take care in using the model as a guideline for designing new GCS inhibitors. It should be noted that one might see differences when comparing compounds from the series at higher (millimolar) concentrations; however, we decided to refrain from these studies for the dual reason that such measurements are complicated and that millimolar inhibitors hold no therapeutic value. When looking at the two glucosylceramidases, it is immediately apparent that removing both C2-OH and C3-OH, as in series A and B, is detrimental for all activity irrespective of the configuration of the remaining chiral carbon centers. Selected compounds from the C sublibrary, however, retain some activity toward GBA1 or GBA2, especially in those cases where R is adamantanemethyloxypentyl. For instance, d-gluco-configured derivative 30 inhibits GBA2 at an IC50 of 1 μM, whereas its l-ido-congerer 39 does so at 0.5 μM (IC50); this compound, in fact, appears to be a rather selective GBA2 inhibitor that may find application as such. In general, however, deoxygenation at C2 appears to considerably impair inhibitory potency of deoxynojirimycin-type iminosugars, also against glycosidases.

Table 1. Enzyme Inhibition Assay Results: Apparent IC50 Values in μM.

graphic file with name ml-2011-00050s_0001.jpg
a

Other enzyme assays are in vitro; AMP = 5-(adamantan-1-yl-methoxy)pentyl.

Returning to the original research objective, our results strongly suggest that C2-OH does contribute to a large extent to GCS inhibition, this in contrast to the model proposed by Butters.25 As a preliminary study, we probed the importance of the C6-hydroxyl to GCS inhibitory potency. To this end, we prepared both 6-deoxy-N-(adamantanemethoxyethyl)deoxynojiimycin 52 and its xylo-congener (lacking the C5-hydroxymethyl substituent, 53) and established their IC50 values against the same panel of enzymes. Interestingly, the 6-deoxy-compound turned out to be a quite potent (IC50 0.8 μM) GCS inhibitor, in fact, only 4-fold less potent than our lead compounds. It thus appears that the C6-OH is less important than C3-OH and C4-OH, which is suggested by the ceramide mimic model. Compound 53 retains some inhibitory potency against GBA1 and GBA2 as well, which is unfortunate when considering the need for selective GCS inhibitors. A substituent at C5 does appear of importance, as xylo-piperidine 53 turned out to have no GCS inhibitory activity.

In conclusion, we have added to the growing list of iminosugar inhibitor studies through the preparation and evaluation of a comprehensive library of N-alkyl C2-deoxy- and C2/C3-dideoxy deoxynojirimycin derivatives. We focused our inhibitory studies on enzymes involved in mammalian glucosylceramide metabolism and did not identify a new attractive lead toward either GCS or GBA1. We do note the selectivity of compound 39 toward inhibition of GBA2,34 which might be of interest for studies in which the physiological role of this enzyme is questioned. Moreover, our library encompasses all possible configurational isomers at C3, C4, and C5 and it is not excluded that individual compounds possess strong affinity toward glycoprocessing enzymes not included in our screening panel. With respect to the mode of action by which deoxynojirimycin-type iminosugars can inhibit GCS, we have strong, but indirect, evidence that a C2-OH is important but that the C6-OH is amenable for modification. We focus our current research on the development of potent and selective GCS inhibitors on preparing some configurational deoxynojirimycin isomers (other than those already known) and on modifying the nature of the N-alkyl substituent.

Supporting Information Available

Full details on the synthesis, purification, and analysis of the compound library and the enzyme assays used. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

The research described was funded by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), Leiden University, and the Academic Medical Center.

Supplementary Material

ml200050s_si_001.pdf (363.5KB, pdf)

References

  1. Jeckel D.; Karrenbauer A.; Burger K. N.; van Meer G.; Wieland F. Glucosylceramide is synthesized at the cytosolic surface of various Golgi subfractions. J. Cell. Biol. 1992, 117, 259–267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sakabe K.; Hart G. W. O-GlcNAc transferase regulates mitotic chromatin dynamics. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 34460–34468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Platt F. M.; Neises G. R.; Dwek R. A.; Butters T. D. N-Butyldeoxynojirimycin is a novel inhibitor of glycolipid biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 8362–8365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Platt F. M.; Jeyakumar M.; Andersson U.; Priestman D. A.; Dwek R. A.; Butters T. D.; Cox T. M.; Lachmann R. H.; Hollak C.; Aerts J. M.; van Weely S.; Hrebícek M.; Moyses C.; Gow I.; Elstein D.; Zimran A. Inhibition of substrate synthesis as a strategy for glycolipid lysosomal storage disease therapy. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 2001, 24, 275–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aerts J. M.; Hollak C. E.; Boot R. G.; Groener J. E.; Maas M. Substrate reduction therapy of glycosphingolipid storage disorders. J. Inherited Metab. Dis. 2006, 29, 449–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cox T.; Lachmann R.; Hollak C.; Aerts J.; van Weely S.; Hrebícek M.; Platt F.; Butters T.; Dwek R.; Moyses C.; Gow I.; Elstein D.; Zimran A. Novel oral treatment of Gaucher’s disease with N-butyldeoxynojirimycin (OGT 918) to decrease substrate biosynthesis. Lancet 2000, 355, 1481–1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Overkleeft H. S.; Renkema G. H.; Neele J.; Vianello P.; Hung I. O.; Strijland A.; van der Burg A. M.; Koomen G. J.; Pandit U. K.; Aerts J. M. Generation of specific deoxynojirimycin-type inhibitors of the non-lysosomal glucosylceramidase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 26522–26527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wennekes T.; van den Berg R. J. B. H. N.; Donker W.; van der Marel G. A.; Strijland A.; Aerts J. M. F. G.; Overkleeft H. S. Development of adamantan-1-yl-methoxy-functionalized 1-deoxynojirimycin derivatives as selective inhibitors of glucosylceramide metabolism in man. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1088–1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Aerts J. M.; Ottenhoff R.; Powlson A. S.; Grefhorst A.; van Eijk M.; Dubbelhuis P. F.; Aten J.; Kuipers F.; Serlie M. J.; Wennekes T.; Sethi J. K.; O’Rahilly S.; Overkleeft H. S. Pharmacological inhibition of glucosylceramide synthase enhances insulin sensitivity. Diabetes 2007, 56, 1341–1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bijl N.; Sokolović M.; Vrins C.; Langeveld M.; Moerland P. D.; Ottenhoff R.; van Roomen C. P.; Claessen N.; Boot R. G.; Aten J.; Groen A. K.; Aerts J. M.; van Eijk M. Modulation of glycosphingolipid metabolism significantly improves hepatic insulin sensitivity and reverses hepatic steatosis in mice. Hepatology 2009, 50, 1431–1441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bietrix F.; Lombardo E.; van Roomen C. P.; Ottenhoff R.; Vos M.; Rensen P. C.; Verhoeven A. J.; Aerts J. M.; Groen A. K. Inhibition of glycosphingolipid synthesis induces a profound reduction of plasma cholesterol and inhibits atherosclerosis development in APOE*3 Leiden and low-density lipoprotein receptor–/– mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 931–937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shen C.; Bullens D.; Kasran A.; Maerten P.; Boon L.; Aerts J. M.; van Assche G.; Geboes K.; Rutgeerts P.; Ceuppens J. L. Inhibition of glycolipid biosynthesis by N-(5-adamantane-1-yl-methoxy-pentyl)-deoxynojirimycin protects against the inflammatory response in hapten-induced colitis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2004, 4, 939–951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. van Eijk M.; Aten J.; Bijl N.; Ottenhoff R.; van Roomen C. P.; Dubbelhuis P. F.; Seeman I.; Ghauharali-van der Vlugt K.; Overkleeft H. S.; Arbeeny C.; Groen A. K.; Aerts J. M. Reducing glycosphingolipid content in adipose tissue of obese mice restores insulin sensitivity, adipogenesis and reduces inflammation. PLoS One 2009, 4, e4723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Natoli T. A.; Smith L. A.; Rogers K. A.; Wang B.; Komarnitsky S.; Budman Y.; Belenky A.; Bukanov N. O.; Dackowski W. R.; Husson H.; Russo R. J.; Shayman J. A.; Ledbetter S. R.; Leonard J. P.; Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya O. Inhibition of glucosylceramide accumulation results in effective blockade of polycystic kidney disease in mouse models. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 788–792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kato A.; Kato N.; Kano E.; Adachi I.; Ikeda K.; Yu L.; Okamoto T.; Banba Y.; Ouchi H.; Takahata H.; Asano N. Biological properties of d- and l-1-deoxyazasugars. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 2036–2044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wennekes T.; van den Berg R. J. B. H. N.; Boot R. G.; van der Marel G. A.; Overkleeft H. S.; Aerts J. M. F. G. Glycosphingolipids-nature, function, and pharmacological modulation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8848–8869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stütz A. E.Iminosugars as Glycosidase Inhibitors: Nojirimycin and Beyond; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  18. Martin O. R.; Compain P.. Iminosugars: From synthesis to therapeutic applications; Wiley-VHC: Weinheim, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  19. Compain P.; Martin O. R. Carbohydrate mimetics-based glycosyltransferase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 3077–3092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Compain P.; Martin O. R. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of iminosugar-based glycosyltransferase inhibitors. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 541–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Platt F. M.; Neises G. R.; Karlsson G. B.; Dwek R. A.; Butters T. D. N-butyldeoxygalactonojirimycin inhibits glycolipid biosynthesis but does not effect N-linked oligosaccharide processing. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 27108–27114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Butters T. D.; van den Broek L. A. G. M.; Fleet G. W. J.; Krulle T. M.; Wormald M. R.; Dwek R. A.; Platt F. M. Molecular requirements of imino sugars for the selective control of N-linked glycosylation and glycosphingolipid biosynthesis. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 113–124. [Google Scholar]
  23. Butters T. D.Iminosugar inhibitors for substrate reduction therapy for the lysosomal glycosphingolipidoses. In Iminosugars: From synthesis to therapeutic applications; T. D. Martin O. R., Compain P., Eds.; Wiley-VHC: Weinheim, 2007; pp 249–268. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wennekes T.; Meijer A. J.; Groen A. K.; Boot R. G.; Groener J. E.; van Eijk M.; Ottenhoff R.; Bijl N.; Ghauharali K.; Song H.; O’Shea T. J.; Liu H.; Yew N.; Copeland D.; van den Berg R. J.; van der Marel G. A.; Overkleeft H. S.; Aerts J. M. Dual-action lipophilic iminosugar improves glycemic control in obese rodents by reduction of visceral glycosphingolipids and buffering of carbohydrate assimilation. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 689–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Butters T. D.; Mellor H. R.; Narita K.; Dwek R. A.; Platt F. M. Small-molecule therapeutics for the treatment of glycolipid lysosomal storage disorders. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, B: Biol. Sci. 2003, 358, 927–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Takahata H.; Banba Y.; Ouchi H.; Nemoto H.; Kato A.; Adachi I. Aymmetric synthesis of the four possible fagomine isomers. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3603–3607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Takahata H.; Banba Y.; Ouchi H.; Nemoto H. Concise and highly stereocontrolled synthesis of 1-deoxygalactonojirimycin and its congeners using dioxanylpiperidene, a promising chiral building block. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2527–2529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Takahata H.; Banba Y.; Sasatani M.; Nemoto H.; Kato A.; Adachi I. Asymmetric synthesis of 1-deoxynojirimycin and its congeners from a common chiral building block. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 8199–8205. [Google Scholar]
  29. van den Broek L. A. G. M.; Vermaas D. J.; Heskamp B. M.; van Boeckel C. A. A.; Tan M. C. A. A.; Bolscher J. G. M.; Ploegh H. L.; van Kemenade F. J.; de Goede R. E. Y.; Miedema F. Chemical modification of azasugars, inhibition of N-glycoprotein-processing glycosidases and of HIV-I infection. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1993, 112, 82–94. [Google Scholar]
  30. van den Broek L. A. G. M.; Vermaas D. J.; van Kemenade F. J.; Tan M. C. C. A.; Rotteveel F. T. M.; Zandberg P.; Butters T. D.; Miedema F.; Ploegh H. L.; van Boeckel C. A. A. Synthesis of oxygen-substituted N-alkyl 1-deoxynojirimycin derivatives: aza sugar α-glucosidase inhibitors showing antiviral (HIV-1) and immunosuppressive activity. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1994, 113, 507–516. [Google Scholar]
  31. van Weely S.; van Leeuwen M. B.; Jansen I. D. C.; de Bruijn M. A. C.; Brouwer-Kelder E. M.; Schram A. W.; Sa Miranda M. C.; Barranger J. A.; Petersen E. M.; Goldblatt J.; Stotz H.; Schwarzmann G.; Sandhoff K.; Svennerholm L.; Erikson A.; Tager J. M.; Aerts J. M. F. G. Clinical phenotype of Gaucher disease in relation to properties of mutant glucocerebrosidase in cultured fibroblasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1991, 1096, 301–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Aerts J. M.; Donker-Koopman W. E.; van der Vliet M. K.; Jonsson L. M.; Ginns E. I.; Murray G. J.; Barranger J. A.; Tager J. M.; Schram A. W. The occurrence of two immunologically distinguishable beta-glucocerebrosidases in human spleen. Eur. J. Biochem. 1985, 150, 565–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. van Weely S.; Brandsma M.; Strijland A.; Tager J. M.; Aerts J. M. Demonstration of the existence of a second, non-lysosomal glucocerebrosidase that is not deficient in Gaucher disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1993, 1181, 55–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Boot R. G.; Verhoek M.; Donker-Koopman W.; Strijland A.; van Marle J.; Overkleeft H. S.; Wennekes T.; Aerts J. M. Identification of the non-lysosomal glucosylceramidase as beta-glucosidase 2. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 1305–1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ml200050s_si_001.pdf (363.5KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES