Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jun;55(6):1163–1165. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.016

Practical Vancomycin Dosing in Hemodialysis Patients in the Era of Emerging Vancomycin Resistance: A Single-Center Experience

Maria E Taylor 1, Michael Allon 1
PMCID: PMC4019019  NIHMSID: NIHMS581566  PMID: 20497837

Vancomycin is used commonly to treat Gram-positive bacteremia in hemodialysis patients [1]. The most accurate and practical method to monitor vancomycin effectiveness is to measure the trough vancomycin concentration prior to the fourth dose [1]. Because vancomycin is cleared by renal excretion, it can be dosed following each dialysis session to maintain therapeutic plasma concentrations [2]. Vancomycin clearance during hemodialysis is negligible with low-flux dialyzers, but substantial (~40%) with high-flux dialyzers [3, 4]. Administration of vancomycin at the end of each dialysis session avoids intra-dialytic clearance and ensures therapeutic concentrations [3, 4]. However, this practice is logistically challenging in the outpatient dialysis setting. For this reason, vancomycin is frequently infused during the last hour of each dialysis session. Using such a regimen, Ariano et al achieved pre-dialysis serum vancomycin concentrations of 5 to 20 mg/L in most hemodialysis patients [5]. We have been using a similar protocol (a loading dose of 20 mg/kg during the first dialysis session, followed by 500 mg during the last 30 min of each subsequent session) to administer vancomycin at our institution.

Until recently, the recommended trough serum vancomycin concentrations were 5-20 mg/L. However, the frequency of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus infections with relative resistance to vancomycin has been increasing [1, 6]. Recent studies have documented an association between trough vancomycin serum concentrations < 10 mg/L and therapeutic failure, which could potentially promote the emergence of vancomycin resistance [7, 8]. These observations have led to new consensus guidelines, which recommend maintaining a minimal vancomycin trough of >10 mg/L to avoid development of vancomycin resistance, and a concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L to optimize tissue penetration and clinical outcomes in patients with complicated infections [1].

Most U.S. hemodialysis units are at freestanding locations, and patient blood samples are shipped to a remote laboratory for testing [9, 10]. As a result, serum vancomycin concentrations are not readily available. Thus, it would be desirable to have a dosing regimen that achieves therapeutic trough vancomycin concentrations in the vast majority of patients without requiring routine drug monitoring. We performed a quality assurance study to determine whether a higher fixed dose of vancomycin administered during the last hour of dialysis sessions could reliably achieve the new target trough vancomycin concentrations in hemodialysis patients.

During a six-month period, we enrolled 34 hospitalized hemodialysis patients (32 with end-stage renal disease and 2 with acute renal failure; 50% female; age range, 21-80 yr; weight range, 50-118 kg; 62% with catheters) receiving vancomycin to treat suspected or documented bacteremia (Table 1). The duration of antibiotics was determined by the infection type. The first dose of administered vancomycin (Hospira Inc, www.hospira.com) was 20 mg/kg (actual weight) (rounded to the nearest 250 mg) and infused at 1000 mg/hr, timed to end with the dialysis session. Subsequent doses of 1000 mg vancomycin were infused during the last hour of each dialysis session. A trough vancomycin concentration was measured after the third dose of vancomycin, and immediately prior to the fourth dialysis session. Serum vancomycin concentrations were measured using the enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (SYNCHRON; Beckman Coulter, www.beckman-coulter.com). Our Institutional Review Board approved retrospective data analysis for research purposes.

Table 1.

Clinical and dialysis features of the study population

Pt No. Age/Sex Admit diagnosis Weight
(kg)
HD prescription Trough
vancomycin
(mg/L)
Access
type
Blood
flow (mL/min)
Dialysate flow
(mL/min)
HD
time
(h)
1 57/F CRB 86.7 TC 400 800 3.5 11.5
2 59/M Gangrene, CRB 81.4 TC 400 800 3.5 21.0
3 36/F Cellulitis 95.7 TC 400 800 3.0 17.3
4 57/M Cellulitis 74.8 AVF 400 800 3.5 17.0
5 44/F CRB 71.4 TC 400 800 3.0 25.3
6 59/M Empyema 72.8 AVF 400 800 3.0 26.9
7 69/M Cardiac arrest, pneumonia 90.9 TC 300 800 3.5 18.2
8 61/M Osteomyelitis 70.0 TC 400 800 3.0 26.9
9 40/F CRB 50.0 TC 400 800 3.0 39.5
10 80/F CRB 64.0 TC 400 800 2.9 15.8
11 32/F AVG infection 107.8 TC 330 800 3.3 15.2
12 58/M Myeloma, CRB 72.5 TC 300 800 4.0 23.1
13 41/M UTI with sepsis 63.9 TC 300 800 4.0 23.8
14 67/M Peripheral graft infection 100.0 AVF 400 800 3.2 14.9
15 50/M ARF, pneumonia 89.2 TC 250 800 4.0 23.9
16 38/F AVG infection 62.3 NTC 400 800 3.5 9.9
17 57/F CRB 83.4 TC 250 800 4.0 19.4
18 59/F Peritonitis 103.5 TC 400 800 3.0 33.1
19 52/M Cirrhosis, sepsis 67.2 TC 400 800 4.0 23.2
20 49/M Gangrene, sepsis 114.3 AVF 400 800 4.0 8.4
21 59/M AVR 73.9 AVF 400 800 3.0 10.6
22 60/F Hip infection 50.0 TC 400 800 3.0 13.8
23 59/F CVA, sepsis 88.5 AVG 400 800 3.0 19.6
24 79/F CRB 62.0 TC 400 800 4.0 21.4
25 58/M Gangrene, sepsis 66.2 AVF 400 800 3.0 15.9
26 53/M Pneumonia, ARF 91.9 NTC 400 800 4.0 12.6
27 43/F Endocarditis 74.8 AVF 400 800 4.0 19.6
28 56/F AIDS, sepsis 74.0 AVF 400 800 3.5 20.1
29 21/M AVF infection 85.7 AVF 400 800 4.0 19.3
30 63/M Osteomyelitis 118.0 AVF 400 800 4.0 17.0
31 70/F Pacemaker infection 79.4 AVF 400 800 3.0 12.2
32 65/F Biliary colic 101.6 TC 400 800 4.0 13.4
33 40/F Cellulitis 60.0 TC 400 800 3.0 20.6
34 75/M Decubitus ulcer infection 71.5 TC 400 800 3.0 15.9

Note: all patients were dialyzed with Revaclear MAX (high-flux polysulfone dialyzer).

Abbreviations: CVA, cerebrovascular accident; AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; UTI, urinary tract infection; CRB, dialysis catheter-related bacteremia; ARF, acute renal failure; AVR, aortic valve replacement; TC, tunneled catheter; NTC, non-tunneled catheter; AVF, arteriovenous fistula; AVG, arteriovenous graft.

Standard descriptive statistics were calculated using the GraphPad Prism software (version 4.0a, GraphPad Software, www.graphpad.com). The mean ± SD trough serum vancomycin concentration was 19.0 ± 6.6 mg/L (95% CI, 16.7 to 21.3 mg/L)(Figure 1). Twelve patients (or 35%) had trough vancomycin concentrations between 15-20 mg/L, and 27 (or 79%) had concentrations between 10-25 mg/L. Only two patients had trough vancomycin concentrations less than 10 mg/L (8.4 and 9.9 mg/L, respectively), requiring an increase in their maintenance vancomycin dose. Five patients (15%) had concentrations > 25 mg/L.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Distribution of trough serum vancomycin concentrations in the study population. The solid line represents the mean value, and the dotted line is the recommended minimum trough vancomycin concentration (10 mg/L) to avoid development of vancomycin resistance. The mean ± SD trough serum vancomycin concentration was 19.0 ± 6.6 mg/L (95% CI, 16.7 to 21.3 mg/L).

Our protocol achieved vancomycin concentrations >10 mg/L prior to the fourth dose in nearly all patients. Our study has some limitations. First, it was performed at a single medical center, and would need to be validated at other centers. Second, we did not perform formal pharmacokinetic studies to quantify vancomycin clearance by the dialyzer. Thus, the actual systemic vancomycin dose received by each patient is unknown. Third, we used a single type of high-flux dialyzer, and vancomycin clearance may differ with other dialyzers. Fourth, we did not quantify residual kidney function. In patients with significant endogenous vancomycin clearance, this protocol might produce subtherapeutic vancomycin concentrations. Finally, we employed a “one-size-fits-all” approach to maintenance vancomycin dosing. This strategy offers the advantage of simplicity in the outpatient dialysis setting, in which serum vancomycin concentrations are not readily available. However, it carries the potential risk of underdosing vancomycin in some patients. Thus, therapeutic drug monitoring may still be indicated in patients with morbid obesity (body mass index >40 kg/m2), those with significant residual kidney function, and those with a dialysis duration >4 h. Conversely, vancomycin overdosing may occur in small individuals using this protocol.

Acknowledgements

Support: None.

Footnotes

Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R, Craig W, Billeter M, Dalovisio JR, Levine DP. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: A consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Matzke GR, McGory RW, Halstenson CE, Keane WF. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in patients with various degrees of renal function. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984;25:433–437. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.4.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barth RH, DeVincenzo N. Use of vancomycin in high-flux hemodialysis: experience with 130 courses of therapy. Kidney Int. 1996;50:929–936. doi: 10.1038/ki.1996.393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pai AB, Pai MP. Vancomycin dosing in high flux hemodialysis: A limited-sampling algorithm. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61:1812–1816. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/61.17.1812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ariano RE, Fine A, Sita DS, Rexrode S, Zelenitsky SA. Adequacy of a vancomycin dosing regimen in patients receiving high-flux hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;46:681–687. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Smith TL, Pearson Ml, Wilcox KR, Cruz C, Lancaster MV, Robinson-Dunn B, Tenover FC, Zervos MJ, Band JD, White E, Jarvis WR, for the Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Working Group Emergence of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:493–501. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902183400701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sakoulas G, Gold HS, Cohen RA, Venkataraman L, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM. Effects of prolonged vancomycin administration on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a patient with recurrent bacteremia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57:699–704. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Howden BP, Ward PB, Charles PG, Korman TM, Fuller A, du Cros P, Grabsch EA, Roberts SA, Robson J, Read K, Bak N, Hurley J, Johnson PD, Morris AJ, Mayall BC, Grayson ML. Treatment outcomes for serious infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:521–528. doi: 10.1086/381202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Allon M. Treatment guidelines for dialysis catheter-related bacteremia: An update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54:13–17. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O’Grady NP, Raad II, Rijnders BJA, Sheretz RJ, Warren DK. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1–45. doi: 10.1086/599376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES