Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 29.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Discov Today Ther Strateg. 2014 Mar 29;9(4):e173–e182. doi: 10.1016/j.ddstr.2013.12.001

Protein Kinase Signaling at the Crossroads of Myocyte Life and Death in Ischemic Heart Disease

Ronald J Vagnozzi 1, Nicholas E Hoffman 1, John W Elrod 1, Muniswamy Madesh 1, Thomas Force 1
PMCID: PMC4019409  NIHMSID: NIHMS567142  PMID: 24839450

Abstract

Myocardial ischemia results in death of cardiac myocytes via tightly-regulated and interconnected signaling pathways. Protein kinases play crucial roles in this regulation and are highly amenable to therapeutic intervention, making targeted inhibition an attractive strategy for ischemic heart disease. Recent studies have uncovered numerous kinases that participate in the cardiomyocyte response to ischemic injury, thus potentiating the development of new therapeutics. Moreover, many kinase signaling pathways converge at the mitochondria, a key participant in both cardiomyocyte physiology and the pathogenesis of ischemic heart disease. Herein we highlight kinase pathways regulating three major drivers of cell death: mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening (mPTP), programmed necrosis and Ca2+ overload-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Inhibition of each of these kinase pathways has been proposed as a means to limit cardiomyocyte death from ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury.

Introduction

Heart failure has reached epidemic levels worldwide and is associated with profound morbidity and mortality. Although the etiology of heart failure is strikingly complex, in many instances it develops progressively in patients who have suffered a myocardial infarction (MI), resulting in tissue ischemia and subsequent death of cardiac myocytes. Overall patient prognosis post-MI, including whether the patient will ultimately progress to heart failure, is largely dependent on the extent of myocyte loss during this initial ischemic insult and the gradual cell dropout associated with the progression of disease. Despite an overwhelming medical need, therapies that reduce myocyte death post-MI have remained elusive, and drug development in this area has largely stagnated. Thus the field is very much in need of novel targets and more effective approaches to therapeutics.

Modulation of protein kinase signaling has gained increased attention as a means to limit cardiomyocyte death. Myocyte loss due to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) occurs by both necrosis and apoptosis, and recent reports have suggested phosphorylation events via downstream kinases may directly modulate these cell death pathways. These mechanisms, at least in part, have also been shown to modulate mitochondrial function or mitochondria-mediated cell death. Growing evidence recognizes the mitochondria as a major effector of cardiomyocyte death and dysfunction in ischemic heart disease. Consequently, kinases acting at “nodal points” to regulate multiple forms of myocyte death, including mitochondria-mediated death, may represent particularly promising avenues for therapeutic intervention.

Mitochondrial Permeability Transition: A Pivotal Event in Myocyte Life or Death

Maintenance of mitochondrial membrane integrity, particularly the regulated permeability of the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), is essential for ATP generation and metabolic and energetic homeostasis in the cell. As such, mitochondrial permeability transition (mPT), a dynamic event in which solutes up to 1.5 kD in mass freely cross the IMM [1], can have profound effects on cellular bioenergetics as well as cell survival. The mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) is the key mechanistic effector of mPT. The structure and composition of the mPTP remains largely unknown, with cyclophilin D (CypD) being the only established molecular component [24]. Historical models of the pore included adenine nucleotide translocase (ANT) transporters and VDAC [5], both of which have not held up to genetic scrutiny as bona fide components of the pore itself, although they do regulate mPT. The mitochondrial phosphate carrier (PiC) can also regulate mPTP opening, but it is not yet clear whether PiC is an actual pore component.

Under physiological conditions, it has been suggested that mPTP opening regulates mitochondrial Ca2+ extrusion [68], and this may also facilitate proper metabolic function of the mitochondria [9]. However, considerably more focus has been placed on the pathological roles of the mPTP in several forms of cell death. The mPTP is highly responsive to cellular stresses, including changes in intracellular pH, mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial matrix Ca2+ levels, or reactive oxygen species (ROS). Ultimately, the consequences of prolonged mPTP opening include impaired ATP production, ROS elevation (a phenomenon known as ROS-induced ROS release) and the swelling and lysis of mitochondria, leading to cell death by necrosis. In cardiac systems, the mPTP has been implicated in the pathophysiology of ischemic injury for more than two decades [10]. Moreover, numerous studies have established the mPTP as a major effector of reperfusion injury during pathological stress [1113], and a potential target for drug development [14,15]. Since then, considerable efforts have broadened our knowledge on the mechanisms of mPTP activation, including modulation by protein kinase signaling, and the resulting cellular consequences.

Kinase Regulation of mPTP: The PI3K-Akt-GSK3 axis

Although several signaling pathways have been implicated in mPT, the precise mechanisms by which mPTP opening is regulated remain undefined. One principal pathway implicated in mPTP regulation is the PI3K-Akt-GSK3 axis. Akt, or protein kinase B (PKB), is a serine-threonine kinase and a master regulator of cellular responses such as survival, proliferation, nutrient sensing/utilization and growth. In the heart, the literature on Akt is extensive [16] and has largely established Akt as a key pro-survival kinase in normal cardiac homeostasis and in response to injury. Classically, Akt activation via upstream phosphatidylinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) promotes survival via inhibition of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins Bax and Bad, limiting mitochondrial outer membrane (OMM) permabilization and thereby blocking release of cytochrome c and caspase-mediated apoptosis.

The glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) serine/threonine kinases, GSK-3α and GSK-3β, are key downstream targets of Akt which are active when dephosphorylated. Phosphorylation of downstream substrates by GSK-3 confers deactivation; thus GSK-3 phosphorylation by Akt or other upstream mediators results in inhibition of GSK-3-regulated targets. Inactivation of GSK-3b by Akt reduces mitochondrial Bax recruitment [17] as well as mPTP opening [18]. Later studies showed that GSK-3β localizes to mitochondria following inactivation (phosphorylation) and resides in the same fraction as ANT and VDAC [1820]. While these studies did not prove direct association with the mPTP, they support a role for GSK-3β as a regulator of pore activity. Whether GSK-3β acts directly on the mPTP, or mediates mPTP indirectly via intermediate substrates is not yet known. In a myocardial postconditioning model utilizing phospho-dead GSK-3β mutant mice [21], cytoprotective postconditioning was shown to require GSK-3β inactivation. However, mitochondria isolated from the phospho-dead mutant showed no alteration in Ca2+ retention capacity, suggesting that modulation of the mPTP by GSK-3β is most likely independent of CypD. In other studies, GSK-3β has been shown to directly phosphorylate CypD, albeit using recombinant protein systems [22], but the effect of this phosphorylation on CypD function, or its occurrence in vivo, has not been determined [9]. GSK-3β also has been reported to phosphorylate Bax, inducing its mitochondrial translocation [23]. In addition to its role in apoptosis, Bax itself has recently been implicated as a mediator of mitochondrial IMM permeabilization and necrosis [24,25], representing another layer of GSK-3β regulation. These and other studies make the Akt-GSK-3β signaling axis a nexus of pro-survival signaling and one major point of convergence between apoptotic and necrotic death regulation. Thus inhibition of GSK-3β has been frequently proposed as a prominent target for cardioprotection.

In contrast to GSK-3β, the role of GSK-3α in cardiomyocyte death is largely unexplored. Recent data from the Force lab suggested that GSK-3α plays a critical role in limiting ischemic injury. These studies showed that loss of GSK-3α increased cardiomyocyte apoptosis post-MI or in response to hypoxia, in part by promoting mitochondrial Bax recruitment and subsequent cytochrome c release [26]. Thus regulation of cardiomyocyte death by GSK-3s in I/R appears to be highly isoform-specific, in that GSK-3α promotes survival, whereas GSK-3β promotes both necrosis and apoptosis. Thus the development of isoform-specific inhibitors remains a crucial obstacle in how to therapeutically limit myocyte loss via blocking GSK-3β, or several of the other kinases we next discuss.

Additional Targets of Akt-mediated Regulation of mPTP

Hexokinase

Hexokinase phosphorylates glucose to form glucose-6-phosphate, a limiting substrate in glycolysis. Hexokinases can associate physically to the outer membrane of mitochondria (OMM) through interaction with VDAC and presumably this interaction may position hexokinase at ATP microdomains and thereby act as a sensor or switch to maintain energy homeostasis (ATP is a necessary substrate for hexokinase activity). Hexokinase has been shown to interact with VDAC, and this has been proposed as an inhibitor of permeability transition [27,28]. Exactly how hexokinase detachment from mitochondria can modulate mPTP opening remains unclear. One possibility may be via an alteration in cellular redox status, as isolated mitochondria studies suggest that the VDAC-hexokinase interaction is important in ADP recycling, suppression of ROS production, and maintenance of mitochondrial membrane potential [29,30]. Of note, phosphorylation of hexokinase by Akt at the mitochondria has been proposed to regulate this interaction. Indeed, mitochondrial dysfunction and Ca2+ handling following oxidative stress were ameliorated by Akt activation, via a mechanism that depended on hexokinase association with mitochondria. However, further confusing the true nature of hexokinase in mPTP control is a report using genetic manipulation that revealed hexokinases’ role in mPTP-mediated cell death is independent of VDAC but yet requires CypD and/or ANT [31]. Taken together, hexokinase activity downstream of Akt seems to play an important role in modulation of mPTP, but further studies are required to fully define the mechanisms of this effect.

p53

A recent study by Vaseva et. al. has implicated p53 as another key mediator of mPTP. The authors reported that p53 can induce necrosis via interaction with CypD, specifically in the setting of oxidant stress [32]. Akt is also known to regulate p53 via activation of murine double minute 2 (MDM2), an E3 ubiquitin ligase. In the cardiomyocyte, p53 is induced in response to stresses such as ischemia and exerts powerful pro-death effects [33]. Loss of MDM2 increases p53 expression and I/R injury in the mouse heart [34], while MDM2 over-expressing mice show protection in this model. MDM2 phosphorylation by Akt increases MDM2 activity, nuclear import, and protein stability, which enhances MDM2 activity to confer protection from apoptosis [35]. From this it is tempting to speculate that Akt-mediated inhibition of p53 via MDM2 could also impart protection from mPTP and necrosis [36]. However, the authors found no alteration in Ca2+-dependent mPTP opening by p53, which is arguably the most fundamental regulator of permeability transition. This and other inconsistencies [37] suggest that p53- mediated cell death may occur via an indirect effect on mPTP. Indeed, numerous studies have shown p53 to activate and oligomerize Bcl2 proteins to permeabilize the OMM, including work from the same lab [38]. Thus many key questions remain as to the precise mechanisms of p53 mediation of mPTP, and potential application for cardiovascular therapy.

Programmed Necrosis/Necroptosis: A Merged Lane to Cell Death

Cell death by necrosis is a fundamental pathological event. In the ischemic heart, the ultrastructural features of necrosis, such as cellular swelling, membrane damage and cell rupture, were demonstrated more than forty years ago. Since then numerous studies have supported the concept that necrosis predominates as the form of cellular injury in myocardial infarction [39]. In response to ischemia, a significant portion of cardiac cells (notably myocytes but also cardiac fibroblasts and cells of the vasculature) die by necrosis due to overwhelming cellular damage. Loss of oxygen and nutrients in cardiac myocytes leads to rapid depletion of cellular ATP, resulting in mitochondrial dysfunction, decreased intracellular pH, and energetic imbalance as cells shift from aerobic to anaerobic respiration. Compromised myocytes rapidly lyse, releasing cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins, free radical reactive oxygen species (ROS), and other pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic factors which subsequently contribute to further myocyte loss [5] [40] [41].

Classically regarded as a passive consequence of tissue damage, recent studies have revealed a highly regulated system of inducible, “programmed” necrosis via signaling through the pro-inflammatory death receptors, including: TNFα receptor, TNF–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), Fas, or toll-like receptors (in cardiomyocytes, predominantly TLR2 and TLR4). Upon death receptor activation, the fate of the stimulated cell is dictated by the regulated assembly and disassembly of a macromolecular protein complex termed the “necrosome” or “necroptosome” [42], which can include more than a dozen different proteins [43]. Of note, mPTP has also been put forth as a major component of programmed necrosis, although it is not yet clear whether death receptor signaling is a direct contributor to mPTP. Nevertheless, the conventional wisdom that necrosis and apoptosis represent distinct and disconnected cellular phenomena has largely transformed into a more dynamic view of cell death, containing aspects of both and subject to convergent regulatory pathways.

Kinase Regulation of Programmed Necrosis: The Receptor Interactin Protein (RIP) Pathway

Signaling for programmed necrosis converges on the receptor interacting protein 1 and 3 (RIP1, RIP3) kinases. RIP1 was first identified from a yeast two-hybrid screen due to its ability to bind the Fas death receptor via a C-terminal death domain [44]. Later studies showed RIP1 also binds the death receptors Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) and Tumor necrosis-mediated apoptosis-inducing ligand receptors 1 (TRAILR1) and 2 (TRAILR2) [42]. RIP1 also interacts with its partner kinase, RIP3, through a RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM) [45]. Both RIP1 and RIP3 have an N-terminal serine/threonine protein kinase domain required for activation of various RIP1/3 interacting partners [45]. Subsequent RIP-mediated signaling is therefore driven by the selective recruitment of these RIP1/RIP3 interacting partners (the necrosome), initially at the activated death receptor.

RIP1/3 signaling leads to increased ROS production and subsequent cytotoxicity [43]. Moreover, RIP1 kinase activity induces necrosis by activating Fas/TNF-R/TRAIL-R signaling [4649]. This induction of necrosis is highly dependent on the interaction partners recruited to RIP1/3. In Fas-initiated necrotic cell death, RIP1 binds to the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) of Fas [46]. In TNF-α initiated cell death RIP1 forms a superoxide-producing complex by interacting with the NAD(P)H oxidase NOX1, its adaptor protein NOXO1, TNFR1-associated death domain protein (TRADD) and Rac1 [50]. RIP1 has also been implicated in TLR stimulation and DNA damage-induced necrosis [5153].

Regulation of RIP1 and RIP3 via post-translational modification also plays a role in the cellular decision to undergo apoptosis (vs. necrosis). Ubiquitination and acetylation both are suggested to regulate RIP-mediated signaling. Non-ubiquitinated RIP1 binds second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (Smac), which activates RIP1 and facilitates the formation of a complex containing RIP1, RIP3, TRADD, Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD), and caspase-8 (termed complex I). In this complex RIP1 and RIP3 are cleaved by activated caspase 8 [54] thus suppressing necrosis in favor of caspase 8-mediated apoptosis [55,56]. Upon deactivation of caspase-8 by caspase inhibitors, the degradation of RIP1 and RIP3 is inhibited, allowing for phosphorylation of RIP1 and RIP3 to occur. Phosphorylated RIP1 and RIP3 then form a cytosolic, pro-necrotic complex, termed complex II, which activates the pro-necrotic pathways described above [57]. Likewise, RIP1 deacetylation by sirtuin-2 (SIRT2) was also recently shown to facilitate the interaction of RIP1 with RIP3 and thus the formation of complex II [58]. This study also showed that SIRT2 deletion or inhibition also reduced I/R injury and LV dysfunction in mice and restored RIP1 acetylation, supporting the therapeutic potential for modulating RIP-mediated necrosis in ischemic heart disease.

Given the key mechanistic roles of RIP binding partners in determining cell fate, identifying novel members of the RIP interactome or necrosome has become a highly active area of research. More specifically, while RIP1 is thought to activate RIP3 via direct interaction, the substrates of activated RIP3 are essentially unknown. Recently, Wang et. al. reported that phosphoglycerate mutase family member 5 (PGAM5), a mitochondrial protein phosphatase, is a novel interaction partner and substrate of RIP3 that serves to integrate death receptor-level signaling with mitochondrial dysfunction and mitochondria-mediated programmed necrosis [59]. The authors show that, in response to multiple necrosis inducers, PGAM5 splice variants PGAM5S and PGAM5L form a tethering complex for RIP1/RIP3 at the mitochondrial outer membrane. PGAM5 then dephosphorylates the mitochondrial fission regulator Drp1, which allows for Drp1 dimerization and thus activation. Dynamic regulation of mitochondrial fission and fusion has been implicated in both normal cardiac physiology and conditions such as ischemia and HF [60], potentially providing new options for therapeutic intervention [61,62]. Moreover, the findings of Wang et. al. build upon previous studies, including those from our group, that have implicated mitochondria as a nexus of necroptotic signaling via RIP activity [63]. Further investigation of RIP-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation as a novel component of programmed necrosis is therefore warranted.

Perhaps the most compelling evidence for the functional role of RIP kinases in necrotic death are studies with necrostatins, a family of small-molecule RIP kinase inhibitors. Originally utilized in a cerebral ischemia model and in the molecular identification of RIP1 kinase [49,64], necrostatin has been proposed as a cardioprotective agent via targeted inhibition of RIP1 [65]. To-date, two studies have directly examined this hypothesis in vivo. Smith et. al. reported a significant reduction in post-I/R infarct size in mice treated with necrostatin via intraperitoneal injection at reperfusion, as well as a reduction in oxidant stress-induced mPTP opening in isolated myocytes [65]. Additional work from this group showed that cardioprotection by necrostatin required CypD, implicating mPTP modulation as a key mechanistic effector of necroptosis [66]. More recently, Oerlemans et. al. independently demonstrated a reduction in infarct size with necrostatin delivered pre-reperfusion, as well as a decrease in chronic adverse remodeling [67]. These studies further support the potential of RIP kinase inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for ischemic injury.

Mitochondrial Calcium Uptake: A Dangerous Consequence of Ca2+ Overload

Cytosolic Ca2+ overload is a pathological hallmark of ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Mitochondria are known to possess an extraordinary capacity to take up Ca2+ and may buffer cytosolic Ca2+ levels. However, only recently, with the molecular identification of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU) and the MCU-associated regulators mitochondrial calcium uptake 1 (MICU1) [68,69] and mitochondrial calcium uniporter regulator 1 (MCUR1) [70] has mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake emerged as a key mechanism of cardiovascular disease pathogenesis [23] [71]. Regulation of overall Ca2+ handling and Ca2+ compartmentalization by mitochondria are highly dynamic events, and while mitochondrial buffering of cytosolic Ca2+ has been proposed as an adaptive response to stress, excess mitochondrial Ca2+ considerably increases mPTP susceptibility and promotes myocyte death via apoptosis and necrosis [1] [72] [73]. As a result, the signaling mechanisms that regulate MCU-mediated Ca2+ entry into mitochondria are of considerable interest in the search for new ways to limit cardiomyocyte death.

Kinase Regulation of MCU-mediated Ca2+ Uptake: CaMKII at the Mitochondria

Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) is a multifaceted serine-threonine kinase consisting of four major isoforms (α, β, γ, and δ) with several subclasses, and serves as a nodal regulator of Ca2+-mediated signaling and cellular Ca2+ cycling and homeostasis. In the heart, inhibition of CaMKII protects against I/R injury [74] and pressure overload-induced cardiac decompensation [75] and limits contractile dysfunction in failing hearts [76]. Indeed, the diversity and importance of CaMKII-mediated pathways and effectors has resulted in considerable focus on CaMKII; both as a key mediator of cardiomyocyte (patho)physiology [77] and as a potential therapeutic target [78] [79].

CaMKII has been shown to enhance cardiomyocyte death via several mechanisms [8083]. These and other studies have revealed that CaMKII activity in the setting of I/R is strongly associated with elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ via increased sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ release as well as regulation of the sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX). Often, the net result of this cytosolic Ca2+ overload is a secondary increase in mitochondrial Ca2+ and subsequent cell death. A recent study by Joiner et. al. has now also proposed direct regulation of MCU by CaMKII phosphorylation as a means of increasing mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, thus promoting ischemic injury in the heart [84]. Using transgenic expression of a membrane and mitochondria-targeted CaMKII inhibitory protein, CaMKIIN, the authors demonstrated in mice that blocking CaMKII activity at the mitochondria decreased MCU activity (IMCU) and reduced Ca2+-induced mPT. Moreover, targeted CaMKII inhibition reduced infarct size, mitochondrial damage and cell death in a mouse model of I/R. These data suggest that therapeutic CaMKII inhibition could serve to limit mitochondrial Ca2+ overload and subsequent cell death. These findings reveal a previously unexplored role for CaMKII signaling at the mitochondria, as well as raise important additional questions [85]. In particular, the mechanisms by which CaMKII translocates to the mitochondria, and the ways in which mitochondrial CaMKII is activated (it is still unclear whether mitochondria contain a functional pool of calmodulin) have not yet been determined. Activation of CaMKII by oxidative modification is one possible mechanism [86]. Indeed, CaMKII oxidation has been shown to regulate cardiac dysfunction in response to stress [87,88], raising the possibility that CaMKII oxidation may also occur at the mitochondria, a central location of redox signaling.

Despite the considerable gains made toward understanding mitochondrial Ca2+ import, the full molecular composition of the MCU remains undefined. Using an RNAi-based screen, the Madesh lab recently identified mitochondrial calcium uniporter regulator 1 (MCUR1), as a novel and essential component of MCU-mediated Ca2+ uptake [70]. More recently, Plovanich et. al. reported on the existence of MICU1 and MICU2, two paralogous forms of the MCU regulator MICU1 [89]. These studies demonstrated a dynamic regulation of MCU function by these component proteins, raising the possibility that kinase signaling via CaMKII (or other kinases) could also indirectly impact MCU activity via regulation of MCU-interacting proteins. The study by Joiner et. al. presents a novel regulatory role for CaMKII in subcellular Ca2+ handling; thus further studies are warranted to further explore the functional consequences of mitochondrial CaMKII signaling and potential therapeutic applications. Of note, as in the case of GSK-3, targeting CaMKII for inhibition will also likely necessitate the development of highly isoform-specific inhibitors, as the multiple CaMKII subtypes can often play divergent, if not contrasting, roles, both in the heart and elsewhere [90,91].

Conclusions: Targeted Protein Kinase Inhibition for Ischemic Heart Disease

Herein we have discussed three emerging mechanisms of cell death in the ischemic heart: mPTP opening, programmed necrosis, and Ca2+ overload, as well as provided an example of a nodal kinase pathway for each, inhibition of which may represent a therapeutic strategy for limiting myocyte loss. We have not attempted to cover the myriad other kinases implicated in the regulation of these cell death mechanisms. Rather, we have chosen to highlight recent developments, as well as emphasize the convergence of these pathways on the mitochondria, which has become an increasingly crucial contributor to multiple cell death programs.

Kinase inhibitors have remained an attractive therapeutic strategy for many diseases; however, their clinical application for cardiovascular disease, despite much enthusiasm, has languished, undoubtedly due in part to the hurdles involved in inhibitor development [92] as well as the complex nature of heart disease. This underscores the continued importance of extensively validating potential targets, particularly newer targets such as RIP1/RIP3, in well-defined animal models [93]. Moreover, the need to develop and validate isoform-specific inhibitors for targets such as GSK-3 and CaMKII remains a crucial step in the transition to the clinic. As such, the kinases reviewed here are promising examples of drug targets warranting further studies, to determine their suitability and applicability for clinical application.

Figure 1. mPTP-mediated Cell Death and Regulation by Akt-GSK3 Signaling.

Figure 1

Kinases implicated in mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening downstream of Akt activation. Cyclophilin D (CypD) is an essential regulator of mPTP. Other proposed molecular contributors to mPTP include the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC), the adenine nucleotide transporter (ANT), and the mitochondrial phosphate carrier (PiC).

Figure 2. Programmed Necrosis and Regulation by The RIP Kinase Pathway.

Figure 2

Schematic depicting the selective assembly of the necrosome/necroptosome under I/R or inflammatory (Infl.) stress. Apoptotic versus necrotic outcome is governed by the maintenance of RIP1 and RIP3 kinase levels and activity, as well as the subcellular recruitment of the RIP1/RIP3 complex to the membrane versus the cytosol and mitochondria.

Figure 3. Mitochondrial Calcium Overload and Regulation by CaMKII.

Figure 3

Sources of cytosolic Ca2+ overload in response to I/R, and modulation by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMKII). CaMKII has recently also been proposed to impact mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake via the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU), which is itself regulated by mitochondrial calcium uptake 1 (MICU1) and mitochondrial calcium uniporter regulator 1 (MCUR1).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest associated with this work.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Literature Cited

  • 1.Di Lisa F, Bernardi P. A CaPful of mechanisms regulating the mitochondrial permeability transition. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009;46 (6):775–780. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baines CP, et al. Voltage-dependent anion channels are dispensable for mitochondrial-dependent cell death. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9 (5):550–555. doi: 10.1038/ncb1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baines CP, et al. Loss of cyclophilin D reveals a critical role for mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death. Nature. 2005;434 (7033):658–662. doi: 10.1038/nature03434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nakagawa T, et al. Cyclophilin D-dependent mitochondrial permeability transition regulates some necrotic but not apoptotic cell death. Nature. 2005;434 (7033):652–658. doi: 10.1038/nature03317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baines CP. How and when do myocytes die during ischemia and reperfusion: the late phase. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2011;16 (3–4):239–243. doi: 10.1177/1074248411407769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ichas F, Mazat JP. From calcium signaling to cell death: two conformations for the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Switching from low- to high-conductance state. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1366 (1–2):33–50. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(98)00119-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elrod JW, et al. Cyclophilin D controls mitochondrial pore-dependent Ca(2+) exchange, metabolic flexibility, and propensity for heart failure in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120 (10):3680–3687. doi: 10.1172/JCI43171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Korge P, et al. Protective role of transient pore openings in calcium handling by cardiac mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 2011;286 (40):34851–34857. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.239921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Elrod JW, Molkentin JD. Physiologic functions of cyclophilin d and the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Circ J. 2013;77 (5):1111–1122. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Di Lisa F, et al. Mitochondrial injury and protection in ischemic pre- and postconditioning. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14 (5):881–891. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Di Lisa F, Bernardi P. Mitochondria and ischemia-reperfusion injury of the heart: fixing a hole. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;70 (2):191–199. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Myocardial reperfusion injury. N Engl J Med. 2007;357 (11):1121–1135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Halestrap AP. Mitochondrial calcium in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1787 (11):1289–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hausenloy DJ, et al. Inhibiting mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening at reperfusion protects against ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;60 (3):617–625. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Argaud L, et al. Trimetazidine inhibits mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening and prevents lethal ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005;39 (6):893–899. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2005.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sussman MA, et al. Myocardial AKT: the omnipresent nexus. Physiol Rev. 2011;91 (3):1023–1070. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00024.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Linseman DA, et al. Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta phosphorylates Bax and promotes its mitochondrial localization during neuronal apoptosis. J Neurosci. 2004;24 (44):9993–10002. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2057-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Juhaszova M, et al. Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta mediates convergence of protection signaling to inhibit the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. J Clin Invest. 2004;113 (11):1535–1549. doi: 10.1172/JCI19906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nishihara M, et al. Erythropoietin affords additional cardioprotection to preconditioned hearts by enhanced phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291 (2):H748–755. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00837.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miki T, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in diabetic hearts abolishes erythropoietin-induced myocardial protection by impairment of phospho-glycogen synthase kinase-3beta-mediated suppression of mitochondrial permeability transition. Diabetes. 2009;58 (12):2863–2872. doi: 10.2337/db09-0158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gomez L, et al. Inhibition of GSK3beta by postconditioning is required to prevent opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore during reperfusion. Circulation. 2008;117 (21):2761–2768. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.755066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rasola A, et al. Activation of mitochondrial ERK protects cancer cells from death through inhibition of the permeability transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107 (2):726–731. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912742107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Murphy E, Steenbergen C. Mechanisms underlying acute protection from cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury. Physiol Rev. 2008;88 (2):581–609. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00024.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Whelan RS, et al. Bax regulates primary necrosis through mitochondrial dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109 (17):6566–6571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201608109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Karch J, et al. Bax and Bak function as the outer membrane component of the mitochondrial permeability pore in regulating necrotic cell death in mice. Elife. 2013;2:e00772. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lal H, et al. Glycogen synthase kinase-3α limits ischemic injury, cardiac rupture, post-myocardial infarction remodeling and death. Circulation. 2012;125 (1):65–75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.050666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Beutner G, et al. Complexes between kinases, mitochondrial porin and adenylate translocator in rat brain resemble the permeability transition pore. FEBS Lett. 1996;396 (2–3):189–195. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)01092-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Beutner G, et al. Complexes between porin, hexokinase, mitochondrial creatine kinase and adenylate translocator display properties of the permeability transition pore. Implication for regulation of permeability transition by the kinases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1368 (1):7–18. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(97)00175-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Camacho-Pereira J, et al. Reactive oxygen species production by potato tuber mitochondria is modulated by mitochondrially bound hexokinase activity. Plant Physiol. 2009;149 (2):1099–1110. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.129247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.da-Silva WS, et al. Mitochondrial bound hexokinase activity as a preventive antioxidant defense: steady-state ADP formation as a regulatory mechanism of membrane potential and reactive oxygen species generation in mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 2004;279 (38):39846–39855. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403835200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chiara F, et al. Hexokinase II detachment from mitochondria triggers apoptosis through the permeability transition pore independent of voltage-dependent anion channels. PLoS One. 2008;3 (3):e1852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vaseva AV, et al. p53 opens the mitochondrial permeability transition pore to trigger necrosis. Cell. 2012;149 (7):1536–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Long X, et al. p53 and the hypoxia-induced apoptosis of cultured neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. J Clin Invest. 1997;99 (11):2635–2643. doi: 10.1172/JCI119452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Toth A, et al. Differential regulation of cardiomyocyte survival and hypertrophy by MDM2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase. J Biol Chem. 2006;281 (6):3679–3689. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509630200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Parcellier A, et al. PKB and the mitochondria: AKTing on apoptosis. Cell Signal. 2008;20 (1):21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Willis MS, Patterson C. Into the heart: the emerging role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2006;41 (4):567–579. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Karch J, Molkentin JD. Is p53 the long-sought molecular trigger for cyclophilin D-regulated mitochondrial permeability transition pore formation and necrosis? Circ Res. 2012;111 (10):1258–1260. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.280990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wolff S, et al. p53’s mitochondrial translocation and MOMP action is independent of Puma and Bax and severely disrupts mitochondrial membrane integrity. Cell Res. 2008;18 (7):733–744. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kung G, et al. Programmed necrosis, not apoptosis, in the heart. Circ Res. 2011;108 (8):1017–1036. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.225730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Whelan RS, et al. Cell death in the pathogenesis of heart disease: mechanisms and significance. Annu Rev Physiol. 2010;72:19–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.010908.163111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chiong M, et al. Cardiomyocyte death: mechanisms and translational implications. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2:e244. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2011.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Declercq W, et al. RIP kinases at the crossroads of cell death and survival. Cell. 2009;138 (2):229–232. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vandenabeele P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of necroptosis: an ordered cellular explosion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11 (10):700–714. doi: 10.1038/nrm2970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stanger BZ, et al. RIP: a novel protein containing a death domain that interacts with Fas/APO-1 (CD95) in yeast and causes cell death. Cell. 1995;81 (4):513–523. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90072-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sun X, et al. Identification of a novel homotypic interaction motif required for the phosphorylation of receptor-interacting protein (RIP) by RIP3. J Biol Chem. 2002;277 (11):9505–9511. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109488200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Holler N, et al. Fas triggers an alternative, caspase-8-independent cell death pathway using the kinase RIP as effector molecule. Nat Immunol. 2000;1 (6):489–495. doi: 10.1038/82732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Harper N, et al. Fas-associated death domain protein and caspase-8 are not recruited to the tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 signaling complex during tumor necrosis factor-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278 (28):25534–25541. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303399200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chan FK, et al. A role for tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 and receptor-interacting protein in programmed necrosis and antiviral responses. J Biol Chem. 2003;278 (51):51613–51621. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305633200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Degterev A, et al. Identification of RIP1 kinase as a specific cellular target of necrostatins. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4 (5):313–321. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kim YS, et al. TNF-induced activation of the Nox1 NADPH oxidase and its role in the induction of necrotic cell death. Mol Cell. 2007;26 (5):675–687. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shen HM, et al. Essential roles of receptor-interacting protein and TRAF2 in oxidative stress-induced cell death. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24 (13):5914–5922. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.13.5914-5922.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ma Y, et al. NF-kappaB protects macrophages from lipopolysaccharide-induced cell death: the role of caspase 8 and receptor-interacting protein. J Biol Chem. 2005;280 (51):41827–41834. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510849200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xu Y, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 signaling to mitochondria in necrotic cell death requires RIP1/TRAF2-mediated JNK1 activation. J Biol Chem. 2006;281 (13):8788–8795. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508135200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.He S, et al. Receptor interacting protein kinase-3 determines cellular necrotic response to TNF-alpha. Cell. 2009;137 (6):1100–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bertrand MJ, et al. cIAP1 and cIAP2 facilitate cancer cell survival by functioning as E3 ligases that promote RIP1 ubiquitination. Mol Cell. 2008;30 (6):689–700. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang L, et al. TNF-alpha induces two distinct caspase-8 activation pathways. Cell. 2008;133 (4):693–703. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cho YS, et al. Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation. Cell. 2009;137 (6):1112–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Narayan N, et al. The NAD-dependent deacetylase SIRT2 is required for programmed necrosis. Nature. 2012;492 (7428):199–204. doi: 10.1038/nature11700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang Z, et al. The mitochondrial phosphatase PGAM5 functions at the convergence point of multiple necrotic death pathways. Cell. 2012;148 (1–2):228–243. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chen L, Knowlton AA. Mitochondrial dynamics in heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 2011;17 (6):257–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00255.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Carreira RS, et al. Mitochondrial therapeutics for cardioprotection. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17 (20):2017–2035. doi: 10.2174/138161211796904777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Palaniyandi SS, et al. Regulation of mitochondrial processes: a target for heart failure. Drug Discov Today Dis Mech. 2010;7 (2):e95–e102. doi: 10.1016/j.ddmec.2010.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Irrinki KM, et al. Requirement of FADD, NEMO, and BAX/BAK for aberrant mitochondrial function in tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced necrosis. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31 (18):3745–3758. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05303-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Degterev A, et al. Chemical inhibitor of nonapoptotic cell death with therapeutic potential for ischemic brain injury. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1 (2):112–119. doi: 10.1038/nchembio711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Smith CC, et al. Necrostatin: a potentially novel cardioprotective agent? Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2007;21 (4):227–233. doi: 10.1007/s10557-007-6035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lim SY, et al. The cardioprotective effect of necrostatin requires the cyclophilin-D component of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2007;21 (6):467–469. doi: 10.1007/s10557-007-6067-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Oerlemans MI, et al. Inhibition of RIP1-dependent necrosis prevents adverse cardiac remodeling after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion in vivo. Basic Res Cardiol. 2012;107 (4):270. doi: 10.1007/s00395-012-0270-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Perocchi F, et al. MICU1 encodes a mitochondrial EF hand protein required for Ca(2+) uptake. Nature. 2010;467 (7313):291–296. doi: 10.1038/nature09358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mallilankaraman K, et al. MICU1 Is an Essential Gatekeeper for MCU-Mediated Mitochondrial Ca(2+) Uptake that Regulates Cell Survival. Cell. 2012;151 (3):630–644. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mallilankaraman K, et al. MCUR1 is an essential component of mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake that regulates cellular metabolism. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14 (12):1336–1343. doi: 10.1038/ncb2622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Goonasekera SA, Molkentin JD. Unraveling the secrets of a double life: contractile versus signaling Ca2+ in a cardiac myocyte. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;52 (2):317–322. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.O’Rourke B. Pathophysiological and protective roles of mitochondrial ion channels. J Physiol. 2000;529(Pt 1):23–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00023.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Orrenius S, et al. Regulation of cell death: the calcium-apoptosis link. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4 (7):552–565. doi: 10.1038/nrm1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Vila-Petroff M, et al. CaMKII inhibition protects against necrosis and apoptosis in irreversible ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;73 (4):689–698. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ling H, et al. Requirement for Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II in the transition from pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy to heart failure in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119 (5):1230–1240. doi: 10.1172/JCI38022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sossalla S, et al. Inhibition of elevated Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II improves contractility in human failing myocardium. Circ Res. 2010;107 (9):1150–1161. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.220418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Anderson ME, et al. CaMKII in myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;51 (4):468–473. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bányász T, et al. Cardiac calmodulin kinase: a potential target for drug design. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18 (24):3707–3713. doi: 10.2174/092986711796642409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Currie S, et al. Two candidates at the heart of dysfunction: The ryanodine receptor and calcium/calmodulin protein kinase II as potential targets for therapeutic intervention-An in vivo perspective. Pharmacol Ther. 2011;131 (2):204–220. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yang Y, et al. Calmodulin kinase II inhibition protects against myocardial cell apoptosis in vivo. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291 (6):H3065–3075. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00353.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Palomeque J, et al. Angiotensin II-induced oxidative stress resets the Ca2+ dependence of Ca2+-calmodulin protein kinase II and promotes a death pathway conserved across different species. Circ Res. 2009;105 (12):1204–1212. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.204172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zhu W, et al. Activation of CaMKIIdeltaC is a common intermediate of diverse death stimuli-induced heart muscle cell apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282 (14):10833–10839. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611507200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ling H, et al. Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II δ mediates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury through nuclear factor-κB. Circ Res. 2013;112 (6):935–944. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.276915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Joiner ML, et al. CaMKII determines mitochondrial stress responses in heart. Nature. 2012;491 (7423):269–273. doi: 10.1038/nature11444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Correll RN, Molkentin JD. CaMKII does it again: even the mitochondria cannot escape its influence. Circ Res. 2013;112 (9):1208–1211. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Erickson JR, et al. A dynamic pathway for calcium-independent activation of CaMKII by methionine oxidation. Cell. 2008;133 (3):462–474. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Luo M, et al. Diabetes increases mortality after myocardial infarction by oxidizing CaMKII. J Clin Invest. 2013;123 (3):1262–1274. doi: 10.1172/JCI65268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Roe ND, Ren J. Oxidative activation of Ca(2+)/calmodulin-activated kinase II mediates ER stress-induced cardiac dysfunction and apoptosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;304 (6):H828–839. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00752.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Plovanich M, et al. MICU2, a paralog of MICU1, resides within the mitochondrial uniporter complex to regulate calcium handling. PLoS One. 2013;8 (2):e55785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Mishra S, et al. Location matters: clarifying the concept of nuclear and cytosolic CaMKII subtypes. Circ Res. 2011;109 (12):1354–1362. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.248401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.McCullough LD, et al. inhibition of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase β and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV is detrimental in cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2013;44 (9):2559–2566. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Force T, et al. Inhibitors of protein kinase signaling pathways: emerging therapies for cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2004;109 (10):1196–1205. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000118538.21306.A9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Houser SR, et al. Animal models of heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Res. 2012;111 (1):131–150. doi: 10.1161/RES.0b013e3182582523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES