Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 4.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Nephrol. 2013 Oct 4;38(4):307–315. doi: 10.1159/000355568

Physical Performance and Frailty in Chronic Kidney Disease

Peter P Reese a,b,c, Anne R Cappola d, Justine Shults b,e, Raymond R Townsend a, Crystal Gadegbeku f, Cheryl Anderson g, Joshua F Baker h, Dean Carlow e, Michael J Sulik i, Joan C Lo j, Alan S Go j,k, Bonnie Ky l, Laura Mariani m,n, Harold I Feldman a,b,c, Mary B Leonard b,e; the CRIC Study Investigators*
PMCID: PMC4019506  NIHMSID: NIHMS527763  PMID: 24107579

Abstract

Background

Poor physical performance and frailty are associated with elevated risks of death and disability. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is also strongly associated with these outcomes. The risks of poor physical performance and frailty among CKD patients, however, are not well established.

Methods

We measured the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB, a summary test of gait speed, chair-raises and balance; range 0–12) and the five elements of frailty among 1111 Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort participants. Adjusting for demographics and multiple comorbidities, we fit a linear regression model for the outcome of SPPB score and an ordinal logistic regression model for frailty status.

Results

Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 65 (57–71) years, median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for non-dialysis patients was 49 (36–62) ml/min/1.73m2, and median SPPB score was 9 (7–10). Seven percent of participants were frail and 43% were pre-frail. Compared with the SPPB score for eGFR >60 ml/min/1.73m2, the SPPB was 0.51 points lower for eGFR 30 – 59; 0.61 points lower for eGFR 15 – 29; and 1.75 points lower for eGFR <15; (p<0.01 for all comparisons). eGFR 30 – 59 (OR 1.45; p=0.024), eGFR 15 – 29 (OR 2.02; p=0.002) and eGFR <15 (OR 4.83, p<0.001) were associated with worse frailty status compared with eGFR >60 ml/min/1.73m2.

Conclusions

CKD severity was associated with poor physical performance and frailty in a graded fashion. Future trials should determine if outcomes for CKD patients with frailty and poor physical performance are improved by targeted interventions.

Keywords: Physical performance, frailty, chronic kidney disease

Introduction

CKD is associated with elevated risks of disability, hospitalization and death.[1-3] These adverse outcomes may be due to systemic inflammation, cachexia and the high prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and endocrinopathies such as diabetes mellitus in CKD.[4-7] Measures of physical performance and frailty, initially validated in elderly populations, reveal a loss of physiologic reserve and susceptibility to functional decline.[8-10] However, the prevalence and determinants of poor physical performance and frailty have not been well described in a population with a wide spectrum of renal dysfunction and a broad age range. Poor physical performance and frailty could lie in the pathway between CKD and adverse health outcomes and deserve closer scrutiny.

Compared to self-reported measures of function, physical performance tests such as the SPPB provide objective measurements that are readily compared across populations.[10,11] These measures serve as powerful independent predictors of disability, hip fracture, hospitalization, and mortality in the elderly [12,13] and can identify meaningful differences in function even among individuals without any known disability.[10]

Frailty is a clinical syndrome of global loss of resilience and diminished capacity to respond to health stressors.[9] Limited data exist about predictors and consequences of frailty in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.[14] Among elderly (>65 years) community-dwelling individuals in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), mild to moderate elevation in serum creatinine was associated with a greater prevalence of frailty.[15] Using a modified frailty measure derived from questionnaires, Johansen and colleagues applied the frailty construct to dialysis populations in two studies that had similar findings.[16,17] In a study of 2275 incident dialysis patients in the Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Wave 2 cohort, Johansen's group found that two-thirds were identified as frail. Independently of age, comorbidities and laboratory measures collected during dialysis, frailty was associated with hospitalization and death.[16] Roshanravan et al. assessed frailty among 336 middle-aged patients with CKD in the Seattle Kidney Study and found a strong association between frailty and a combined outcome of death and/or dialysis.[18]

The aims of this cross-sectional study were to 1) determine if greater CKD severity was independently associated with the endpoints of poor physical performance and frailty in a large, racially diverse sample of adults with CKD, and 2) identify additional risk factors for poor physical performance and frailty in CKD.

Methods

Study Population

The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) is a multicenter prospective study of progression of renal disease, risk factors for CVD, and mortality in 3939 adults. Inclusion criteria included ages 21 – 74 years with an eGFR between 20 and 70 mL/min/1.73m2 at enrollment. Exclusions included institutionalization or severe comorbidities such as stage III-IV congestive heart failure (CHF). Socio-demographic characteristics, medical conditions and medications were self-reported at baseline and updated annually. Body mass index (BMI) was measured annually.[19,20]

After institutional review board approval, this cross-sectional Physical Performance Ancillary Study was conducted at four of the seven CRIC centers from April 2008 to February 2010. Participants who had not received a kidney transplant were eligible. Participants provided informed consent.[19-21]

Primary Exposure

The primary exposure was eGFR calculated using the CRIC equation[22] and was categorized as >60, 30–59, 15–29, or <15 ml/min/1.73m2 (the <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 category included participants receiving chronic dialysis.)

Outcomes

The outcomes were SPPB score and frailty status. The SPPB score (range 0–12) was derived from 1) the faster of two timed, usual pace, 15-foot walks, 2) tests of standing balance in the side-by-side, semi-tandem and tandem positions, and 3) a timed series of five attempts to stand from a chair with arms crossed on the chest.[11] For each component, a five-level categorical score was assigned, with 0 representing inability to attempt or complete the test and 4 representing the highest level of performance.[10,11,23,24]

Frailty status was defined using five criteria, as described by Fried: slow gait speed, muscle weakness, low physical activity, exhaustion and unintentional weight loss.[9,13] Gait was assessed with the timed walk used in the SPPB. Exhaustion was assessed using two questions from the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D).[25] Muscle weakness was determined using the average of three grip strength tests using a Digital Grip Dynamometer (Creative Health Products, Ann Arbor, MI). The weight loss criterion was satisfied if change in weight between the visit one year earlier and the current visit revealed >5% loss and the participant denied intentional weight loss. For low physical activity, energy expenditure was assessed using the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Physical Activity Questionnaire [26]. Similar to the approaches used by other studies of frailty, we used items related to household and outdoor chores, as well as walking and other deliberate exercise activities.[9,13,27] We categorized male participants with energy expenditure <383 kcal/week and female participants with <270 kcal/week as having low physical activity. Participants who met 3, 4, or 5 criteria satisfied the frailty endpoint, while those who met 1–2 criteria were pre-frail and others were non-frail.[9]

Exposures

Covariates included age category (<50; 50–59; 60–69; and ≥70 years), race (black vs. non-black), gender, BMI category (<25; 25–29; 30–34; ≥35 kg/m2), diabetes, anemia, CVD (clinical history of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization or CHF), stroke, category of highest education (college graduate or higher; some college; high school graduate; less than high school graduation), income (>$100,000; 50,001–100,000; 20,001–50,000; <20,000), and 25(OH)D deficiency (<20 ng/ml)[28].

We also compared the physical component subscore of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL) instrument across groups defined by eGFR category. The KDQOL comprises questions about physical health-related quality of life.[29] However, we did not adjust for the KDQOL in analyses of frailty and the SPPB because this exposure could plausibly fall in the causal pathway between eGFR and these outcomes.

Laboratory measurements

At the visit when the SPPB and frailty were assessed, serum specimens were collected. Serum creatinines were measured using standard enzyme based assays and calibrated to values at the Cleveland Clinic Research Laboratory.[30] An immunonephelometric assay on the Siemens BN II System was used to measure serum cystatin C.[22] 25(OH) vitamin D concentrations were quantified using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

Statistical Analysis

Analyses were completed using Stata MP 12 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). Continuous variables were reported as median and IQR while categorical variables were described by percentages. For continuous variables, we used Student's t-test or the rank-sum test to compare two groups, as appropriate. The one-way analysis of variance test was used to compare >2 groups. Correlations between two continuous variables were assessed using the Pearson's correlation. Categorical variables were compared between groups using chi-square.

Multivariable linear regression was performed to determine associations between eGFR category and the outcome of SPPB score. Based on prior literature,[9,15,16,31-33] we adjusted for the potential confounders (listed in the “Exposures” section), except for the KDQOL. We examined the R2 statistic and the distribution of residual errors to confirm model assumptions. As a secondary analysis, we excluded the 80 (7%) individuals who had a score of zero (i.e. no attempt) in any SPPB component; associations between eGFR and the SPPB were similar and not shown.

Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio (OR) associated with frailty status and eGFR category. The proportional odds assumption was not violated. To avoid overfitting in the context of a limited number of participants with frailty (n=73), we only added demographics and comorbidities as independent variables to this regression.[34] Additionally, we found nonlinear univariate associations between frailty status and the exposures of age and BMI; large increases in frailty prevalence were evident among participants with age >65 years and BMI >35 kg/m2. Therefore, we entered age (≥65 vs. <65 years) and BMI as binary variables (≥ 35 vs. <35 kg/m2) in the model.

To confirm the robustness of the results, we fit a logistic regression model for frailty alone. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test showed good calibration (p=0.41).

To estimate age-adjusted renal function for individuals within each category of frailty status, we fit a linear regression model for the outcome of eGFR and entered age as an independent variable. eGFR was calculated using the CRIC equation[22] and individuals on dialysis were assigned an eGFR of 10 ml/min/1.73 m2. The “margins” command in Stata was used to derive eGFR from this model.

Guided by literature suggesting that the impact of black race on mortality for individuals with renal disease differs by age [35,36], we fit multivariable models for the outcomes of SPPB score and frailty status with interaction terms constructed as the product of black race and age ≥65 years.

Results

Among 1344 eligible individuals completing CRIC visits over the study interval at participating sites, 209 (16%) did not participate in the ancillary, while 24 (2%) individuals not receiving dialysis were excluded due to insufficient laboratory data to calculate eGFR with the CRIC equation. The final analytic sample comprises the remaining 1111 (83%) participants.

Non-participants and participants in the CRIC ancillary were similar in terms of age (p=0.39) and gender (p=0.29). However, compared with participants, non-participants were more likely to be black (46% vs. 36%, p=0.005), to have diabetes (55% vs. 43%, p=0.001), to be on dialysis (9% versus 4%, p=0.001) and had lower physical component summary scores of the KDQOL instrument (median 39 vs. 45, p<0.001).

Table 1 shows participant characteristics. The median age was 65 years (range 24–80; IQR 57–71; mean 63 years). Forty-one participants were on dialysis. The median eGFR among non-dialysis patients was 49 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 7–146; IQR 36–62). The proportions of participants who were black, had diabetes, or had experienced a stroke or CVD were greater in participants with lower eGFR.

Table 1. Participant Characteristics, Overall and According to eGFR Category.

Overall eGFR ≥60 eGFR 30 - 59 eGFR 15 - 29 eGFR <15 p-value
N 1,111 300 603 148 60
Age, yr 65 (57, 71) 61 (51, 66) 67 (60, 72) 67 (60, 73) 59 (54, 67) <0.001
Age> 65 yr 559 (50%) 97 (32%) 349 (58%) 91 (61%) 22 (37%) <0.001
Female 526 (47%) 143 (48%) 290 (48%) 66 (45%) 27 (45%) 0.87
Black race 396 (36%) 81 (27%) 217 (36%) 62 (42%) 36 (60%) <0.001
Diabetes 473 (43%) 82 (27%) 275 (46%) 73 (49%) 43 (72%) <0.001
Stroke 99 (9%) 16 (5%) 56 (9%) 17 (11%) 10 (17%) 0.02
Cardiovascular disease 286 (26%) 42 (14%) 170 (28%) 49 (33%) 25 (42%) <0.001
Anemia* 413 (37) 49 (16) 224 (37) 100 (68) 40 (68) <0.001
BMI, kg/m2 30 (26, 35) 29 (25, 33) 31 (26, 35) 30 (26, 35) 31 (28, 37) <0.001
BMI category <0.001
 <25 204 (19) 76 (25) 89 (15) 32 (22) 7 (12)
 ≥25 & <30 353 (32) 104 (35) 189 (32) 39 (27) 21 (36)
 ≥30 & <35 282 (26) 74 (25) 165 (28) 33 (23) 10 (17)
 ≥35 263 (24) 45 (15) 155 (26) 42 (29) 21 (36)
Educational attainment <0.001
 Less than high school 550 (50) 194 (65) 279 (46) 56 (38) 21 (35)
 High school grad 321 (29) 65 (22) 179 (30) 52 (35) 25 (42)
 Some college 158 (14) 29 (10) 96 (16) 28 (19) 5 (8)
 College grad or higher 81 (7) 11 (4) 49 (8) 12 (8) 9 (15)
Income stratum <0.001
 < $20,000 214 (19) 89 (30) 101 (17) 18 (12) 6 (10)
 $20,001 - 50,000 309 (28) 102 (34) 155 (26) 38 (26) 14 (23)
 $50,001 - 100,000 281 (25) 50 (17) 169 (28) 42 (28) 20 (33)
 >$100,000 145 (13) 23 (8) 89 (15) 23 (16) 10 (17)
 Declined response 162 (15) 36 (12) 89 (15) 27 (18) 10 (17)
KDQOL Score
 Physical component 48 (37, 54) 52 (44, 55) 48 (35, 53) 43 (33, 52) 38 (31, 47) <0.001
 Mental component 55 (46, 59) 55 (46, 58) 56 (47, 59) 55 (46, 59) 50 (42, 57) 0.02
Vitamin D deficiency 232 (21) 49 (16) 119 (20) 38 (26) 26 (43) <0.001
Dialysis, N (%) 41 (4) 0 0 0 41 (68) <0.001

Data presented as median (interquartile range) or N (%).

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated using the CRIC eGFR equation

BMI, body mass index

KDQOL, Kidney Disease Quality of Life Instrument

Anemia defined as < 12 g/dL for women and < 13 5/dL for mens

Vitamin D deficiency categorized as < 20 ng/mL

The Short Physical Performance Battery

Figure 1 shows the distribution of SPPB scores. The mean score was 8.3 (SD 2.4) and the median was 9 (IQR 7–10). Nineteen percent had an SPPB score <7, 47% SPPB >7 and <10, and 34% had SPPB >10. The SPPB and KDQOL physical component scores were positively associated (rho=0.49, p<0.001).

Figure 1. Distribution of Short Physical Performance Battery Scores among CRIC Participants.

Figure 1

We observed a graded, independent association between severity of renal dysfunction and worse SPPB score (Table 2). In multivariable linear regression, compared with participants with eGFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m2, eGFR between 30 and 59 was associated with a 0.51 point lower score, eGFR between 15 and 29 was associated with a 0.61 point lower score, while eGFR <15 was associated with a 1.75 point lower SPPB score. Older age, black race, female sex, higher BMI, vitamin D deficiency, a history of stroke or CVD, lower income, and less education were significantly and independently associated with lower SPPB score. Diabetes was not a significant risk factor for lower SPPB score in the full model; however, in a model excluding BMI, diabetes was associated with a 0.42 point lower SPPB score (CI -0.67,-0.16; p=0.001). Tests for interaction between black race and age were not significant.

Table 2. Multivariable Linear Regression Model on the Outcome of Short Physical Performance Battery Score.

Characteristics β Coefficient (CI) p-value
eGFR in ml/min/1.73 m2
 >60 Reference
 ≥30 & <60 -0.51 (-0.80, -0.22) 0.001
 ≥15 & <30 -0.61 (-1.03, -0.19) 0.005
 <15 -1.75 (-2.33, -1.16) <0.001
Age in years
 <50 Reference
 ≥50 & <60 -0.36 (-0.79, 0.08) 0.11
 ≥60 & <70 -0.67 (-1.04, -0.29) 0.001
 ≥70 -1.38 (-1.79, -0.97) <0.001
Female -0.53 (-0.78, -0.29) <0.001
Black race -0.39 (-0.68, -0.11) 0.007
Cardiovascular disease -0.36 (-0.65, -0.08) 0.01
Stroke -1.18 (-1.60, -0.77) <0.001
Diabetes -0.24 (-0.49, 0.02) 0.07
Anemia * -0.26 (-0.53, 0.01) 0.06
Vitamin D deficient** -0.40 (-0.70, -0.09) 0.01
Body mass index in kg/m2
 <25 Reference
 ≥25 & <30 -0.09 (-0.43, 0.26) 0.63
 ≥30 & <35 -0.45 (-0.82, -0.09) 0.02
 ≥35 -0.89 (-1.27, -0.50) <0.001
Income Stratum
 >$100,000 Reference
 $50,001 – 100,000 -0.44 (-0.79, -0.09) 0.01
 $20,001 – 50,000 -0.66 (-1.05, -0.28) 0.001
 <$20,000 -1.09 (-1.56, -0.61) <0.001
Declined response -0.57 (-0.99, -0.15) 0.008
Educational Attainment
 College graduate or higher Reference
 Some college -0.09 (-0.38, 0.20) 0.54
 High school graduate -0.44 (-0.83, -0.06) 0.03
 Less than high school -0.51 (-1.02, 0.01) 0.06
*

Anemia categorized as <12 g/dL for women and <13 g/dL for men

**

Vitamin D deficiency categorized as < 20 ng/mL

Frailty

Seventy-three individuals (7%) were frail and 447 (43%) were pre-frail. With reference to individual frailty criteria, 32% had weakness, 21% had exhaustion, 12% had low activity, 11% had slow walking, and 6% had unintentional weight loss over the past year.

The age-adjusted, predicted mean eGFR was 40 for frail, 44 for pre-frail and 54 ml/min/1.73 m2 for non-frail participants. As in Figure 2, worse renal function was associated with greater likelihood of worse frailty status. In multivariable ordinal logistic regression (Table 3), eGFR 30 – 59 (OR 1.45; CI 1.05, 1.99; p=0.024), eGFR 15 – 29 (OR 2.02; CI 1.29, 3.16; p=0.002) and eGFR <15 (OR 4.83; CI 2.60, 8.98; p<0.001) were significantly associated with worse frailty status, compared with eGFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Age ≥65 years, female sex, black race, BMI >35 kg/m2, anemia, CVD and stroke were also associated with worse frailty status.

Figure 2. Prevalence of Frailty and Pre-frailty, by Category of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.

Figure 2

Table 3. Ordinal logistic regression analysis of the categorical outcome of frailty/pre-frailty/non-frailty.

Characteristics Univariate Analysis Multivariable Analysis
Odds Ratio 95% CI p-value Odds Ratio 95% CI p-value
eGFR, ml/min/1.73m2
>60 Reference Reference
30-59 2.26 1.69, 3.04 <0.001 1.45 1.05, 1.99 0.024
15-29 3.88 2.58, 5.83 <0.001 2.02 1.29, 3.16 0.002
<15 9.17 5.09, 16.5 <0.001 4.83 2.60, 8.98 <0.001
Age ≥65 years 1.85 1.42, 2.41 <0.001
Female 1.61 1.24, 2.09 <0.001
Black race 1.50 1.13, 1.98 0.005
BMI ≥35 kg/m2 1.69 1.23, 2.31 0.001
Cardiovascular disease 1.71 1.26, 2.32 0.001
Anemia * 1.63 1.22, 2.17 0.001
Diabetes 1.24 0.94, 1.63 0.13
Stroke 2.08 1.33, 3.24 0.001
*

Anemia categorized as <12 g/dL for women and <13 g/dL for men

In multivariable logistic regression for the outcome of frailty alone (vs. pre-frail and non-frail), the eGFR categories of 30 – 59 (OR 1.49; CI 1.07, 2.06; p=0.018), eGFR 15 – 29 (OR 2.21; CI 1.36, 3.58; p=0.001) and eGFR <15 (OR 5.55; CI 2.48, 12.4; p<0.001) were associated with an elevated odds of frailty.

Age-stratified ordinal logistic regression showed that black race was associated with worse frailty status among individuals <65 years (OR 1.95; CI 1.29, 2.96; p=0.002), but not among those ≥65 years (OR 1.17; CI 0.79, 1.74; p=0.42). In the ordinal logistic regression model with all participants, however, the black race by age ≥65 years interaction did not reach significance (interaction OR 0.66; CI 0.39, 1.12; p=0.12).

Discussion

This study is the first to examine both physical performance and frailty in a large, ethnically diverse cohort with a wide spectrum of CKD severity and age. Worse renal function demonstrated a graded association with worse physical performance and frailty, independent of age, sex, race, BMI, anemia, socioeconomic status and major co-morbidities. These results underscore the need to define the fundamental biological mechanisms in kidney disease that drive the development of poor physical performance, frailty and loss of functional status. Additionally, CKD patients with worsening physical performance or pre-frailty might benefit from targeted interventions to prevent further deterioration in global health.

The SPPB revealed clinically important variation in physical performance in the CRIC cohort. The only other non-transplant CKD population in which the SPPB has been measured is participants in the Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) Trial. Among the 375 (mean age 51 years) FHN participants, 22% had SPPB scores <7 and 42% had scores >10.[32] In our cohort, the proportions were 19% and 34%, respectively, suggesting a similar burden of poor physical performance in the context of more preserved renal function but older mean age (63 years) in CRIC.

Studies of the SPPB in community-dwelling elderly populations without known CKD have shown that 0.5 point differences in SPPB are clinically meaningful, suggesting that the worse SPPB scores associated with severe renal dysfunction in our study would predict adverse health outcomes such as disability.[12,23,37] The modest correlation between SPPB score and the physical components score of the KDQOL supports the idea that observed physical performance and self-reported function capture related but distinct domains of physical health in CKD patients.

The prevalence of frailty (7%) and pre-frailty (43%) in CRIC paralleled those found in cohorts of community-dwelling people whose ages were much older. We measured frailty using criteria developed in the CHS, a cohort of elderly men and women (aged 65–101 years) in which the prevalence of frailty was 7% and pre-frailty was 47%.[9] These criteria were later validated in the Women's Health and Aging Studies (aged 70–79 years), which had a frailty prevalence of 11%[13]; this high prevalence was likely due, in part, to the inclusion of more severely disabled women through home visits. In another community-dwelling cohort aged 65–80 years, Espinoza et al. reported that 7% of individuals of European ancestry and 11% of individuals of Hispanic ancestry were frail.[38] The similarity in the distribution of frailty status between our CKD cohort and cohorts of older community-dwelling people suggest an “accelerated aging” associated with low GFR.

Our study also bears comparison to the recently reported results from the Seattle Kidney Study. The 336 CKD patients in the Seattle Kidney Study had a greater prevalence of frailty (14%) and pre-frailty (52%) than our cohort. Notably, the Seattle Kidney Study assessed weight loss using self-report and categorized low physical activity as self-reported exercise less than once a week.[18] In contrast, we determined weight loss using measured weights at study visits and categorized low physical activity using a systematic assessment of moderate to vigorous physical activities and applying gender-specific cutpoints for weekly energy expenditure that were defined by Fried et al.[9] These differences in prevalence suggest that that the identification of frailty depends to an important degree on the method of assessment.[39] However, despite these differences, our results confirm the graded association between eGFR and frailty that was reported in the Seattle study.[18]

The biological mechanisms that cause poor physical performance and frailty in CKD are incompletely explained. Across the spectrum of renal dysfunction, CKD patients are more likely to have limited physical activity due to co-morbidities such as CVD and anemia. Advanced CKD is often accompanied by inflammation and cachexia that promote loss of lean muscle mass and could worsen physical performance and promote frailty.[7,40,41] Further, CKD is associated with abnormalities in muscle function (particularly in proximal muscles), morphology and metabolism.[42-45] CKD patients also have elevated concentrations of inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α, that are also associated with frailty.[46] Systemic inflammation, elevated angiotensin II levels and metabolic acidosis promote muscle catabolism through impaired insulin/insulin-like growth factor I intracellular signaling and the activation of caspase.[6] These pathologic processes could limit physical activity and worsen physical performance.

Black race was associated with a lower SPPB score and, among participants <65 years, with worse frailty status. Notably, the SPPB analysis was also adjusted for vitamin D, which has been proposed as a mediator in the association of race and kidney disease outcomes.[47] These associations of black race with poor physical performance and frailty in CKD confirm the results of other cohorts.[15,32] Interestingly, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data showed that black individuals <65 years with CKD had elevated mortality,[35] while a competing risks analysis of dialysis patients revealed that black race was associated with a higher risk of death for patients <50 years but a survival advantage for patients ≥50 years.[36] In summary, the elevated risk of death associated with CKD among black patients may depend on age. Our results also reveal the possibility that frailty status lies in the pathway of these relationships.

Future studies should examine the relationship of physical performance and frailty to endpoints including mortality and hospitalization in CKD. A study in sedentary elderly individuals randomized to either a comprehensive physical activity program (aerobic, strength, balance and flexibility exercises) vs. a “successful aging” program (education and light stretching) showed that the comprehensive physical activity led to greater improvement in SPPB scores (8.5 vs. 7.9, p<0.001) and prevented mobility disability (defined as inability to walk 400 meters), suggesting that similar interventions on CKD patients with poor SPPB scores or frailty could also improve health outcomes.[48] Moreover, a meta-analysis of exercise interventions in CKD concluded that benefits include improved quality of life as well as physical fitness, blood pressure and nutrition.[43] Our findings reinforce the need for targeted interventions in CKD that can drive improvements in global health measures such as frailty as well as hard outcomes such as death.

We acknowledge this study's limitations. The primary limitation is the cross-sectional design and the lack of data relating SPPB and frailty to clinical outcomes. Second, reported medical histories likely do not fully capture relevant comorbidities, potentially resulting in residual confounding. Third, we neither have cytokine levels at the time of the ancillary study visit to assess inflammation, nor measures of muscle mass. A fourth limitation is the use of eGFR, rather than measured GFR. However, one would expect frailty to be associated with lower muscle mass, resulting in an overestimate of GFR, and likely biasing the association between eGFR and frailty to the null. Finally, 17% of eligible participants did not enroll in this ancillary study. Non-participants had worse renal function and evidence of worse physical function on the KDQOL questionnaire. It is unlikely, however, that the relationships between eGFR and physical performance or frailty differ in the participants versus non-participants.

Conclusion

Severity of renal dysfunction was strongly associated with frailty and worse physical performance in an ethnically diverse cohort of CKD patients. Additionally, female sex, black race, CVD, elevated BMI and lower socioeconomic status were identified as independent risk factors for poor physical function and frailty. These findings provide further evidence that frailty and physical performance lie in the pathway between CKD and adverse health outcomes.[18] Future studies should examine whether frailty and physical performance are useful independent predictors of survival, hospitalization, disability and other important endpoints in CKD. Lastly, measures of physical performance and frailty might identify CKD patients who would benefit from interventions involving physical therapy, nutrition or novel anti-inflammatory therapies.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH grants to the investigators: K23–DK078688–01 (Dr. Reese), K24–DK002651 (Dr. Feldman), K24–DK076808 (Dr. Leonard) and R01–DK064966 (Dr. Leonard).

Funding for the CRIC Study was obtained under a cooperative agreement from National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK060990, U01DK060984, U01DK061022, U01DK061021, U01DK061028, U01DK060980, U01DK060963, and U01DK060902). In addition, this work was supported in part by: the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Clinical and Translational Science Award NIH/NCATS UL1TR000003, Johns Hopkins University UL1 TR-000424, University of Maryland GCRC M01 RR-16500, Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland, UL1TR000439 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) component of the National Institutes of Health and NIH roadmap for Medical Research, Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR) UL1TR000433, University of Illinois at Chicago CTSA UL1RR029879, Tulane University Translational Research in Hypertension and Renal Biology P30GM103337, Kaiser NIH/NCRR UCSF-CTSI UL1 RR-024131.

Footnotes

Disclosures: There are no conflicts of interest to report.

Preliminary results related to physical performance were presented at the 2011 American Society of Nephrology Annual Meeting in Philadelphia.

References

  • 1.Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1296–1305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Plantinga LC, Johansen K, Crews DC, Shahinian VB, Robinson BM, Saran R, Burrows NR, Williams DE, Powe NR. Association of ckd with disability in the united states. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57:212–227. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fried LF, Lee JS, Shlipak M, Chertow GM, Green C, Ding J, Harris T, Newman AB. Chronic kidney disease and functional limitation in older people: Health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:750–756. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00727.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shlipak MG, Fried LF, Crump C, Bleyer AJ, Manolio TA, Tracy RP, Furberg CD, Psaty BM. Elevations of inflammatory and procoagulant biomarkers in elderly persons with renal insufficiency. Circulation. 2003;107:87–92. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000042700.48769.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garg AX, Blake PG, Clark WF, Clase CM, Haynes RB, Moist LM. Association between renal insufficiency and malnutrition in older adults: Results from the nhanes iii. Kidney Int. 2001;60:1867–1874. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Workeneh BT, Mitch WE. Review of muscle wasting associated with chronic kidney disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:1128S–1132S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28608B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kalantar-Zadeh K, Ikizler TA, Block G, Avram MM, Kopple JD. Malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome in dialysis patients: Causes and consequences. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42:864–881. doi: 10.1016/j.ajkd.2003.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hamerman D. Toward an understanding of frailty. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:945–950. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-11-199906010-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, Leveille SG, Markides KS, Ostir GV, Studenski S, Berkman LF, Wallace RB. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: Consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55:M221–231. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.4.m221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49:M85–94. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:556–561. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199503023320902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bandeen-Roche K, Xue QL, Ferrucci L, Walston J, Guralnik JM, Chaves P, Zeger SL, Fried LP. Phenotype of frailty: Characterization in the women's health and aging studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:262–266. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.3.262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wilhelm-Leen ER, Hall YN, M KT, Chertow GM. Frailty and chronic kidney disease: The third national health and nutrition evaluation survey. Am J Med. 2009;122:664–671 e662. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.01.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shlipak MG, Stehman-Breen C, Fried LF, Song X, Siscovick D, Fried LP, Psaty BM, Newman AB. The presence of frailty in elderly persons with chronic renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43:861–867. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.12.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Johansen KL, Chertow GM, Jin C, Kutner NG. Significance of frailty among dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:2960–2967. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007020221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bao Y, Dalrymple L, Chertow GM, Kaysen GA, Johansen KL. Frailty, dialysis initiation, and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1071–1077. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roshanravan B, Khatri M, Robinson-Cohen C, Levin G, Patel KV, de Boer IH, Seliger S, Ruzinski J, Himmelfarb J, Kestenbaum B. A prospective study of frailty in nephrology-referred patients with ckd. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60:912–921. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Feldman HI, Appel LJ, Chertow GM, Cifelli D, Cizman B, Daugirdas J, Fink JC, Franklin-Becker ED, Go AS, Hamm LL, He J, Hostetter T, Hsu CY, Jamerson K, Joffe M, Kusek JW, Landis JR, Lash JP, Miller ER, Mohler ER, 3rd, Muntner P, Ojo AO, Rahman M, Townsend RR, Wright JT. The chronic renal insufficiency cohort (cric) study: Design and methods. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:S148–153. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000070149.78399.ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lash JP, Go AS, Appel LJ, He J, Ojo A, Rahman M, Townsend RR, Xie D, Cifelli D, Cohan J, Fink JC, Fischer MJ, Gadegbeku C, Hamm LL, Kusek JW, Landis JR, Narva A, Robinson N, Teal V, Feldman HI. Chronic renal insufficiency cohort (cric) study: Baseline characteristics and associations with kidney function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:1302–1311. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00070109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fischer MJ, Go AS, Lora CM, Ackerson L, Cohan J, Kusek JW, Mercado A, Ojo A, Ricardo AC, Rosen LK, Tao K, Xie D, Feldman HI, Lash JP. Ckd in hispanics: Baseline characteristics from the cric (chronic renal insufficiency cohort) and hispanic-cric studies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58:214–227. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Anderson AH, Yang W, Hsu CY, Joffe MM, Leonard MB, Xie D, Chen J, Greene T, Jaar BG, Kao P, Kusek JW, Landis JR, Lash JP, Townsend RR, Weir MR, Feldman HI Investigators CS. Estimating gfr among participants in the chronic renal insufficiency cohort (cric) study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:743–749. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ostir GV, Volpato S, Fried LP, Chaves P, Guralnik JM, Women's H, Aging S. Reliability and sensitivity to change assessed for a summary measure of lower body function: Results from the women's health and aging study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:916–921. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00436-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Radloff L. The ces-d scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, Greenland P, Jacob DR, Jr, Kronmal R, Liu K, Nelson JC, O'Leary D, Saad MF, Shea S, Szklo M, Tracy RP. Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: Objectives and design. American journal of epidemiology. 2002;156:871–881. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eckel SP, Bandeen-Roche K, Chaves PH, Fried LP, Louis TA. Surrogate screening models for the low physical activity criterion of frailty. Aging clinical and experimental research. 2011;23:209–216. doi: 10.1007/bf03324962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Institute of medicine. Dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin d. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hays RD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, Coons SJ, Carter WB. Development of the kidney disease quality of life (kdqol) instrument. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:329–338. doi: 10.1007/BF00451725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Joffe M, Hsu CY, Feldman HI, Weir M, Landis JR, Hamm LL. Variability of creatinine measurements in clinical laboratories: Results from the cric study. Am J Nephrol. 2010;31:426–434. doi: 10.1159/000296250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kutner NG, Zhang R, Bowles T, Painter P. Pretransplant physical functioning and kidney patients' risk for posttransplantation hospitalization/death: Evidence from a national cohort. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1:837–843. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01341005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kaysen GA, Larive B, Painter P, Craig A, Lindsay RM, Rocco MV, Daugirdas JT, Schulman G, Chertow GM Group FHNT. Baseline physical performance, health, and functioning of participants in the frequent hemodialysis network (fhn) trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57:101–112. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Houston DK, Cesari M, Ferrucci L, Cherubini A, Maggio D, Bartali B, Johnson MA, Schwartz GG, Kritchevsky SB. Association between vitamin d status and physical performance: The inchianti study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:440–446. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.4.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and cox regression. American journal of epidemiology. 2007;165:710–718. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mehrotra R, Kermah D, Fried L, Adler S, Norris K. Racial differences in mortality among those with ckd. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19:1403–1410. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007070747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kucirka LM, Grams ME, Lessler J, Hall EC, James N, Massie AB, Montgomery RA, Segev DL. Association of race and age with survival among patients undergoing dialysis. JAMA. 2011;306:620–626. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Volpato S, Cavalieri M, Sioulis F, Guerra G, Maraldi C, Zuliani G, Fellin R, Guralnik JM. Predictive value of the short physical performance battery following hospitalization in older patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66:89–96. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Espinoza SE, Hazuda HP. Frailty in older mexican-american and european-american adults: Is there an ethnic disparity? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:1744–1749. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01845.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Saum KU, Muller H, Stegmaier C, Hauer K, Raum E, Brenner H. Development and evaluation of a modification of the fried frailty criteria using population-independent cutpoints. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:2110–2115. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fried LF, Boudreau R, Lee JS, Chertow G, Kurella-Tamura M, Shlipak MG, Ding J, Sellmeyer D, Tylavsky FA, Simsonick E, Kritchevsky SB, Harris TB, Newman AB, Health A Body Composition S. Kidney function as a predictor of loss of lean mass in older adults: Health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1578–1584. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tonelli M, Sacks F, Pfeffer M, Jhangri GS, Curhan G Cholesterol Recurrent Events Trial I. Biomarkers of inflammation and progression of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2005;68:237–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kettner-Melsheimer A, Weiss M, Huber W. Physical work capacity in chronic renal disease. Int J Artif Organs. 1987;10:23–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Heiwe S, Jacobson SH. Exercise training for adults with chronic kidney disease. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2011:CD003236. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003236.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Heiwe S, Clyne N, Tollback A, Borg K. Effects of regular resistance training on muscle histopathology and morphometry in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation / Association of Academic Physiatrists. 2005;84:865–874. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000184244.86297.6b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moore GE, Bertocci LA, Painter PL. 31p-magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of subnormal oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscle of renal failure patients. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:420–424. doi: 10.1172/JCI116217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Keller C, Katz R, Cushman M, Fried LF, Shlipak M. Association of kidney function with inflammatory and procoagulant markers in a diverse cohort: A cross-sectional analysis from the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis (mesa) BMC Nephrol. 2008;9:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-9-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Melamed ML, Astor B, Michos ED, Hostetter TH, Powe NR, Muntner P. 25-hydroxyvitamin d levels, race, and the progression of kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:2631–2639. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009030283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pahor M, Blair SN, Espeland M, Fielding R, Gill TM, Guralnik JM, Hadley EC, King AC, Kritchevsky SB, Maraldi C, Miller ME, Newman AB, Rejeski WJ, Romashkan S Studenski S-LSI. Effects of a physical activity intervention on measures of physical performance: Results of the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (life-p) study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:1157–1165. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.11.1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES