Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Mar 8;23(5):774–783. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1138

Venous Thromboembolism and Cancer Risk among Elderly Adults in the U.S

Morgan A Marks 1,*, Eric A Engels 1
PMCID: PMC4020513  NIHMSID: NIHMS569707  PMID: 24608188

Abstract

Background

Few studies have evaluated cancer risk following venous thromboembolism (VTE). Both VTE and cancer disproportionately affect older adults.

Methods

Using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, we evaluated 1.2 million cancer cases and 200,000 controls (66–99 years old, 1992–2005). VTEs occurring before selection were identified using Medicare claims. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs).

Results

VTE was present in 2.5% of cases and 2.2% of controls. VTE was associated with risk of cancers of the lung (OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.12–1.23), stomach (1.19, 1.09–1.30), small intestine (1.42, 1.17–1.71), colon (1.25, 1.18–1.31), gallbladder (1.39, 1.16–1.67), pancreas (1.53, 1.43–1.64), soft tissue (1.43, 1.21–1.68), ovary (1.35, 1.22–1.50), and kidney/renal pelvis (1.34, 1.23–1.46), and melanoma (1.17, 1.08–1.27), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1.27, 1.20–1.35), myeloma (1.48, 1.35–1.63), and acute myeloid leukemia (1.35, 1.19–1.54). Strongest risks were observed within 1 year of VTE diagnosis, but risk were elevated more than 6 years after VTE for colon cancer (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.12–1.37), pancreatic cancer (1.33, 1.15–1.54), and myeloma (1.35, 1.10–1.66). Few differences in risk were observed by VTE subtype. Cancers of the lung, stomach, and pancreas were more likely to have distant metastases within one year after VTE.

Conclusion

Among elderly adults, cancer risk is elevated following VTE diagnosis.

Impact

Short-term associations with cancer are likely driven by enhanced screening following VTE and reverse causation. While obesity, other co-morbidities, and smoking cannot be excluded as explanations, longer-term elevations for select cancers suggest that some VTEs may be caused by cancer precursors.

Keywords: Venous thromboembolism, cancer, Medicare, SEER, United States

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) involves obstruction of blood flow caused by the presence of clots and includes pulmonary emboli (PEs) and both deep venous thromboses (DVTs) and superficial venous thromboses (SVTs). VTE affects nearly 500,000 individuals each year. (1, 2) The incidence of VTE increases steeply with age, with rates of 450–600 cases per 100,000 person-years among individuals >65 years of age. (3, 4) Furthermore, VTE risk is four to six-fold higher in individuals diagnosed and treated for cancer. (5, 6) VTE also contributes significant morbidity and mortality among cancer patients, with VTE detected within 1 year prior to cancer diagnosis being associated with advanced stage and poorer post-treatment survival. (7)

While much work has focused on understanding the sources of VTE and its management, (1, 5, 710) only a handful of studies have assessed the association of VTE with the subsequent development of malignancies. Population and hospital-based studies have demonstrated a strong risk of cancer within a very short follow-up time interval after VTE (typically less than 1 year). (1115) Interestingly, prior studies show that those individuals with a longer follow-up time of 2 or more years after VTE also have elevated risk for certain malignancies such as cancers of the digestive tract, ovarian cancer, and lymphomas. (11, 14, 16, 17) These associations appear to be similar across VTE subtypes of PE, DVT, and SVT. (18)

Individuals over the age of 65 years have a disproportionately high burden of both cancer and VTE. We therefore, investigated the relationship of VTE with subsequent development of cancer in a large case- control study of elderly adults in the United States using data from cancer registries and Medicare claims files. The large number of cancer cases and controls in this study afforded us the opportunity to assess the relationship of VTE overall and subtypes of VTE with a wide range of solid-organ and hematologic malignancies.

Materials and Methods

The National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program comprises population-based state and metropolitan cancer registries that ascertain cancers occurring in approximately 26% of the US population. (19) Medicare is a federally-funded program that provides health insurance for 97% of the US population aged greater than 65 years. All Medicare beneficiaries are entitled to coverage for inpatient care (Part A), and most purchase additional coverage for physician and outpatient services (Part B). The SEER-Medicare data set was created by electronically linking SEER and Medicare data. (19) The resulting match links 94% of SEER cancer cases aged 65 and older to Medicare data. In addition, data are available for a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries living in SEER regions. The SEER-Medicare data set contains demographic and clinical information, and Medicare claims data (Part A beginning in 1986, Part B beginning in 1991) on these individuals.

The current study is a population-based case-control study derived from the SEER-Medicare data, as previously described. (20) Cases were defined as individuals with first cancers identified in SEER, aged 66 to 99 between the years 1992 to 2005. Cases identified solely at autopsy or by death certificates were excluded. Cases also were required to have at least 13 months of Part A and Part B Medicare coverage, during which they were not enrolled in a health maintenance organization (HMO), prior to diagnosis. Cancers were categorized based on the SEER program “site recode with Kaposi sarcoma and mesothelioma”, which we modified to collapse some rare categories. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was classified based on the World Health Organization scheme and included chronic lymphocytic leukemia. (21)

Controls (N=200,000) were selected from the 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries living in SEER areas and were frequency-matched to cases by sex, age (66–69, 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, 85–99 years), and calendar year of selection. As of July 1 of the calendar year of selection, controls were alive, cancer-free, and had at least 13 months of Part A, Part B, and non-HMO Medicare coverage. Controls could have been selected multiple times in different calendar years or could later have become a case.

The first recorded VTE was assessed using Medicare claims in hospital, outpatient, and provider files. We defined VTE based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) codes for PE [415.1], DVT [451.1, 451.2, 451.81, 451.83, 453.2, 453.3, and 453.4], SVT [451.0, and 451.82], and venous thrombosis not otherwise specified (VTE NOS) [451.84, 451.89, 453.1, 453.8, and 453.9].

Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), comparing the prevalence of VTE in cases and controls. Given the incidence density sampling of cases and controls from the Medicare cohort, the odds ratios calculated in this study can be interpreted as estimates of relative risk. We accounted for the repeated sampling of controls and the fact that some controls later became cases in the variance calculation. (20) All analyses were adjusted for sex, age, and calendar year of diagnosis/selection. Given the large number of cancer types assessed in this study, a conservative Bonferroni p-value of <0.001 was used as the cut-off for statistical significance.

For cancers that were associated with VTE, we created additional models to evaluate the strength of the association with cancer in different latency intervals after VTE (<1, 1–2.5, 2.6–4.0, 4.1–6, and >6 years). The interaction of VTE and cancer risk across latency intervals was assessed by including a product term in the logistic regression model. We also fit logistic regression models to evaluate associations for each VTE subtype and used likelihood ratio tests to assess the differential effect of VTE subtypes on cancer risk (i.e., to compare the effects of PE or DVT vs. SVT, or of PE vs. DVT). A p-value of <0.05 was used as the cut-off to determine whether the effect on cancer risk varied by latency or VTE subtype. Lastly, among cases with solid-organ cancers, we compared the distribution of SEER cancer stage (local vs. regional vs. distant) among those with a VTE detected <1 year prior to cancer diagnosis, ≥1 year prior to cancer diagnosis, and those without a VTE.

Results

The characteristics of cases and controls are presented in Table 1. The majority of subjects were male, white, and selected between 1999–2002. Cases and controls were matched with respect to age, sex, and year of diagnosis/selection; they differed slightly by race/ethnicity and duration of Medicare coverage.

Table 1.

Subject characteristics

Characteristic Case (N=1, 138, 390)
N (%)
Control (N=200, 000)
N (%)
Age, Years
 65–69 192, 272 (16.9) 33, 780 (16.9)
 70–74 296, 027 (26.0) 52, 008 (26.0)
 75–79 287, 109 (25.2) 50, 440 (25.2)
 80–84 205, 451 (18.1) 36, 097 (18.1)
 85+ 157, 531 (13.8) 27, 675 (13.8)
Sex
 Male 604, 333 (53.1) 106, 172 (53.1)
 Female 534, 057 (46.9) 93, 828 (46.9)
Year of Diagnosis or Selection
 1992–1994 178, 515 (15.7) 31, 364 (15.7)
 1995–1998 226, 785 (19.9) 39, 843 (19.9)
 1999–2002 414, 976 (36.5) 72, 903 (36.5)
 2003–2005 318, 114 (27.9) 55, 890 (27.9)
Race/Ethnicity
 White 973, 236 (85.5) 166, 827 (83.4)
 Black 89, 893 (7.9) 13, 949 (6.9)
 Asian 29, 038 (2.6) 8, 097 (4.1)
 Hispanic 18, 286 (1.6) 5, 199 (2.6)
 Native American 2, 580 (0.2) 656 (0.3)
 Other 21, 965 (1.9) 4, 713 (2.4)
 Unknown 3, 389 (0.3) 558 (0.3)
Duration of Medicare Coverage, Months
 13–60 319, 446 (28.1) 57, 440 (28.7)
 61–120 556, 095 (48.9) 97, 485 (48.7)
 121–180 210, 858 (18.5) 35, 805 (17.9)
 181–240 51, 991 (4.6) 9, 270 (4.6)

VTE was observed among 2.5% of cases and 2.2% controls. Overall, VTE was associated with a 15% increased risk of any cancer (OR 1.15, 95%CI 1.11–1.20) (Table 2). Among the 45 solid-organ cancers assessed, 10 were associated with VTE (p<0.001), including cancers of the lung (OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.12–1.23), stomach (1.19, 1.09–1.30), small intestine (1.42, 1.17–1.71), colon (1.25, 1.18–1.31), gallbladder (1.39, 1.16–1.67), pancreas (1.53, 1.43–1.64), soft tissue including the heart (1.43, 1.21–1.68), ovary (1.35, 1.22–1.50), and kidney/renal pelvis (1.34, 1.23–1.46), and melanoma (1.17, 1.08–1.27). Among 7 evaluated hematologic malignancies, VTE was associated with an increased risk of NHL (OR 1.27, 95%CI 1.20–1.35), myeloma (1.48, 1.35–1.63), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (1.35, 1.19–1.54). Among NHL subtypes, there was a significant association with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (1.41, 1.28–1.55).

Table 2.

Associations of venous thromboembolism and cancer

Total % of subjects with VTE OR (95% CI) p-value
 Controls 200, 000 2.2 1.0
All Cancers 1, 138, 390 2.5 1.15 (1.11, 1.20) <0.001
Head and Neck
 Lip 2, 340 2.1 0.98 (0.74, 1.30) 0.874
 Tongue 4, 486 2.0 0.96 (0.78, 1.19) 0.706
 Salivary Gland 2, 482 2.5 1.07 (0.83, 1.39) 0.600
 Floor of Mouth 1, 412 2.2 1.12 (0.78, 1.60) 0.546
 Gum and Other Mouth 3, 796 2.5 1.12 (0.91, 1.37) 0.287
 Nasopharynx 779 -- 0.68 (0.36, 1.26) 0.219
 Tonsil 1, 583 2.0 1.13 (0.79, 1.61) 0.494
 Oropharynx 543 -- 0.86 (0.44, 1.66) 0.654
 Hypopharynx 1, 660 1.7 0.92 (0.63, 1.34) 0.664
 Larynx 8, 234 1.9 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) 0.995
 Nasal Cavity 1, 451 2.2 0.98 (0.69, 1.40) 0.924
Respiratory Tract
Lung 179, 880 2.5 1.18 (1.12, 1.23) <0.001
 Pleura 78 -- 0.53 (0.08, 3.79) 0.530
 Mesothelioma 3, 333 2.4 1.08 (0.86, 1.35) 0.520
Gastrointestinal Tract
 Esophagus 11, 442 2.4 1.15 (1.01, 1.30) 0.033
Stomach 22, 860 2.8 1.19 (1.09, 1.30) <0.001
Small intestine 3, 694 3.2 1.42 (1.17, 1.71) <0.001
 Appendix 687 2.9 1.35 (0.86, 2.12) 0.187
Colon 107, 265 2.9 1.25 (1.18, 1.31) <0.001
 Rectosigmoid Junction 11, 800 2.1 0.98 (0.86, 1.11) 0.735
 Rectum 24, 762 2.1 0.93 (0.85, 1.03) 0.151
 Anus 2, 633 3.0 1.35 (1.08, 1.70) 0.010
Hepatobiliary Sites
 Liver 10, 219 2.5 1.19 (1.04, 1.35) 0.010
 Intrahepatic Bile Duct 1, 988 2.7 1.14 (0.87, 1.50) 0.338
Gallbladder 3, 777 3.4 1.39 (1.16, 1.67) <0.001
Pancreas 33, 135 3.5 1.53 (1.43, 1.64) <0.001
Bone and Soft Tissue
 Bones and Joints 760 0.64 (0.35, 1.16) 0.139
Soft Tissue including Heart 4, 728 3.3 1.43 (1.21, 1.68) <0.001
Melanoma 27, 059 2.6 1.17 (1.08, 1.27) <0.001
 Retroperitoneum 772 3.1 1.46 (0.97, 2.20) 0.072
 Kaposi Sarcoma 652 3.7 1.54 (1.02, 2.33) 0.039
Reproductive organs
 Breast 134, 274 2.3 1.01 (0.95, 1.07) 0.683
 Cervix 4, 033 2.3 1.05 (0.85, 1.29) 0.674
 Uterus 26, 889 2.4 1.11 (1.02, 1.22) 0.022
Ovary 16, 112 3.1 1.35 (1.22, 1.50) <0.001
 Vagina 927 3.3 1.36 (0.95, 1.96) 0.096
 Vulva 3, 288 2.4 0.90 (0.72, 1.14) 0.391
 Prostate 215, 219 1.7 0.92 (0.87, 0.98) 0.009
 Penis 836 2.4 1.11 (0.71, 1.74) 0.638
Urinary Tract
 Urinary Bladder 61, 751 2.5 1.11 (1.04, 1.18) 0.001
Kidney/Renal Pelvis 24, 611 2.8 1.34 (1.23, 1.46) <0.001
 Ureter 1, 476 3 1.29 (0.95, 1.75) 0.099
Neurologic/Endocrine Sites
 Eye and Orbit 1, 461 2.7 1.27 (0.92, 1.74) 0.140
 Brain 9, 552 2.2 1.06 (0.92, 1.22) 0.440
 Thyroid 5, 923 2.3 1.15 (0.97, 1.37) 0.115
Hematologic Malignancies
 Hodgkin Lymphoma 1, 915 2.8 1.31 (0.99, 1.72) 0.057
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) 55, 195 2.9 1.27 (1.20, 1.35) <0.001
Myeloma 15, 318 3.3 1.48 (1.35, 1.63) <0.001
 Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia 736 3.5 1.61 (1.08, 2.38) 0.018
Acute myeloid Leukemia (AML) 8, 489 3.1 1.35 (1.19, 1.54) <0.001
 Chronic myeloid Leukemia 3, 626 2.9 1.23 (1.01, 1.50) 0.041
 Acute Monocytic Leukemia 508 -- 0.74 (0.38, 1.44) 0.382
NHL subtypes
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma 15, 883 3.3 1.41 (1.28, 1.55) <0.001
 CLL/SLL/PLL 14, 571 2.7 1.19 (1.07, 1.33) 0.001
 Follicular Lymphoma 7, 264 2.3 1.06 (0.90, 1.24) 0.468
 Marginal Zone Lymphoma 3, 223 2.7 1.14 (0.92, 1.42) 0.226
 T-Cell NHL 2, 813 3.0 1.37 (1.10, 1.71) 0.005
 Mantel Cell Lymphoma 1, 553 2.4 1.13 (0.82, 1.56) 0.467
 LPL/Waldenstrom 693 2.6 1.13 (0.71, 1.82) 0.607
 Burkitt Lymphoma 260 -- 1.31 (0.65, 2.67) 0.454

Abbreviations: CLL – Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, SLL – Small lymphocytic leukemia, PLL – T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia, LPL-lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma; Bolded entries indicate a significant association of VTE with cancer at a p-value of <0.001; In accordance with the SEER-Medicare data use agreement, the percentage of cases with VTE is not shown for cancers when the number of cases with VTE is fewer than 11.

We also investigated the association of VTE and cancer risk across different follow-up times (i.e., latency intervals) after VTE (Table 3). For most cancers, risk was strongest <1 year following VTE and significantly attenuated with longer time intervals (p<0.001); an exception was melanoma, for which risk did not vary by time interval. Most associations were not significant >6 years after VTE. However, cancers for which risk was elevated >6 years after VTE included colon cancer (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.12–1.37), pancreatic cancer (1.33, 1.15–1.54), and myeloma (1.35, 1.10–1.66).

Table 3.

Associations of VTE with cancer in different latency intervals following VTE

Total Period within 1 year before cancer diagnosis or selection Period from 1–2.5 years before cancer diagnosis or selection Period from 2.6–4 years before cancer diagnosis or selection Period from 4.1–6 years before cancer diagnosis or selection Period more than 6 before cancer diagnosis or selection P*
% with VTE OR (95% CI) % with VTE OR (95% CI) % with VTE OR (95% CI) % with VTE OR (95% CI) % with VTE OR (95% CI)
Controls 200, 000 0.4 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.5 1.0 ----
All Cancers 1, 138, 390 0.6 1.51 (1.41, 1.63) 0.5 1.04 (0.97, 1.11) 0.4 1.06 (0.98, 1.15) 0.4 1.09 (1.01, 1.18) 0.5 1.10 (1.02, 1.19) <0.001
Lung 179, 880 0.7 1.75 (1.60, 1.92) 0.5 1.06 (0.97, 1.16) 0.4 1.04 (0.94, 1.15) 0.4 1.07 (0.96, 1.18) 0.5 1.01 (0.92, 1.12) <0.001
Stomach 22, 860 0.8 1.75 (1.47, 2.07) 0.5 1.09 (0.91, 1.31) 0.4 0.99 (0.80, 1.23) 0.4 1.02 (0.83, 1.26) 0.6 1.15 (0.96, 1.38) 0.003
Small intestine 3, 694 1.1 2.42 (1.74, 3.38) 0.7 1.49 (1.02, 2.17) 0.3 0.76 (0.42, 1.39) 0.7 1.72 (1.16, 2.54) 0.4 0.79 (0.48, 1.33) 0.002
Colon 107, 265 0.7 1.64 (1.48, 1.82) 0.6 1.15 (1.04, 1.27) 0.4 1.06 (0.94, 1.19) 0.5 1.17 (1.04, 1.31) 0.7 1.24 (1.12, 1.37) 0.002
Gallbladder 3, 777 1.5 3.28 (2.47, 4.35) 0.4 0.78 (0.48, 1.28) 0.4 1.02 (0.62, 1.67) 0.6 1.29 (0.84, 1.97) 0.5 0.89 (0.56, 1.41) <0.001
Pancreas 33, 135 1.2 2.75 (2.43, 3.12) 0.6 1.19 (1.02, 1.38) 0.5 1.26 (1.06, 1.49) 0.5 1.27 (1.08, 1.50) 0.7 1.33 (1.15, 1.54) <0.001
Soft tissue 4, 728 1.0 2.27 (1.67, 3.07) 0.7 1.39 (0.99, 1.96) 0.6 1.59 (1.10, 2.30) 0.6 1.44 (1.00, 2.10) 0.4 0.67 (0.41, 1.08) <0.001
Melanoma 27, 059 0.5 1.10 (0.91, 1.34) 0.6 1.21 (1.02, 1.42) 0.4 1.02 (0.83, 1.26) 0.6 1.38 (1.16, 1.65) 0.6 1.14 (0.96, 1.35) 0.570
Ovary 16, 112 1.2 2.79 (2.35, 3.32) 0.5 0.95 (0.75, 1.21) 0.5 1.17 (0.91, 1.50) 0.4 0.84 (0.64, 1.11) 0.6 1.13 (0.90, 1.42) <0.001
Kidney/Renal Pelvis 24, 611 0.9 2.18 (1.87, 2.54) 0.5 1.16 (0.97, 1.39) 0.4 1.15 (0.94, 1.41) 0.4 1.07 (0.87, 1.32) 0.6 1.20 (1.00, 1.44) <0.001
NHL 55, 195 0.9 2.06 (1.83, 2.31) 0.5 1.01 (0.88, 1.15) 0.5 1.19 (1.03, 1.37) 0.4 1.05 (0.91, 1.21) 0.6 1.16 (1.02, 1.32) <0.001
Myeloma 15, 318 0.9 2.14 (1.78, 2.58) 0.6 1.34 (1.09, 1.64) 0.5 1.29 (1.02, 1.63) 0.6 1.35 (1.08, 1.69) 0.7 1.35 (1.10, 1.66) 0.006
AML 8, 489 0.9 2.00 (1.57, 2.56) 0.5 1.11 (0.83, 1.48) 0.5 1.17 (0.85, 1.62) 0.8 1.80 (1.40, 2.33) 0.5 0.86 (0.63, 1.18) 0.009
*

P-value for test of whether OR differs according to time since VTE; Bolded entries indicate a significant association of VTE with cancer at a p-value of <0.001; NHL-Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, AML-Acute myeloid leukemia

In total, 0.7%, 0.4%, 0.1%, and 1.3% of cases and 0.6%, 0.3%, 0.1%, and 1.2% of controls were diagnosed with PE, DVT, SVT, or VTE NOS, respectively. Overall, for most cancers, risk appeared similar following PE and DVT, or for the combination of PE or DVT compared with SVT (Table 4). NHL and AML were exceptions in that risk was significantly higher following DVT as compared with PE.

Table 4.

Associations of pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis and superficial venous thrombosis with cancer

Total Pulmonary Embolism (PE) Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) Superficial venous Thrombosis (SVT) P1* P2
% PE OR (95% CI) % DVT OR (95% CI) % SVT OR (95 % CI)
Controls 200, 000 0.6 1.0 0.3 1.0 0.1 1.0 ----- -----
All Cancers 1, 138, 390 0.7 1.14 (1.06, 1.22) 0.4 1.22 (1.11, 1.34) 0.1 1.24 (1.05, 1.46) 0.199 0.412
Lung 179, 880 0.7 1.21 (1.11, 1.32) 0.3 1.08 (0.96, 1.22) 0.1 1.27 (1.04, 1.55) 0.119 0.385
Stomach 22, 860 0.7 1.19 (1.01, 1.41) 0.5 1.31 (1.06, 1.63) 0.1 1.20 (0.82, 1.76) 0.462 0.883
Small intestine 3, 694 0.9 1.42 (0.99, 2.02) 0.4 1.32 (0.80, 2.18) --- 2.16 (1.10, 4.23) 0.824 0.250
Colon 107, 265 0.8 1.27 (1.15, 1.39) 0.5 1.27 (1.12, 1.45) 0.2 1.35 (1.08, 1.67) 0.926 0.581
Gallbladder 3, 777 0.8 1.24 (0.86, 1.79) 0.6 1.59 (1.04, 2.45) 0.2 1.68 (0.82, 3.44) 0.391 0.602
Pancreas 33, 135 0.9 1.47 (1.29, 1.68) 0.6 1.66 (1.41, 1.97) 0.2 1.33 (0.98, 1.82) 0.245 0.374
Soft tissue 4, 728 0.5 0.84 (0.56, 1.25) 0.5 1.36 (0.89, 2.08) 0.2 1.65 (0.84, 3.23) 0.112 0.224
Melanoma 27, 059 0.7 1.24 (1.07, 1.45) 0.4 1.27 (1.03, 1.57) 0.1 1.03 (0.70, 1.52) 0.869 0.323
Ovary 16, 112 0.9 1.44 (1.19, 1.73) 0.5 1.49 (1.16, 1.91) 0.1 1.13 (0.71, 1.79) 0.825 0.281
Kidney/Renal Pelvis 24, 611 0.8 1.36 (1.16, 1.59) 0.5 1.53 (1.25, 1.88) 0.2 1.73 (1.24, 2.41) 0.361 0.264
NHL 55, 195 0.7 1.11 (0.98, 1.25) 0.6 1.65 (1.43, 1.91) 0.2 1.50 (1.17, 1.93) <0.001 0.273
Myeloma 15, 318 1.0 1.65 (1.39, 1.96) 0.5 1.37 (1.07, 1.77) 0.1 1.26 (0.81, 1.97) 0.230 0.371
AML 8, 489 0.6 0.96 (0.73, 1.28) 0.7 1.92 (1.46, 2.54) --- 1.51 (0.89, 2.58) 0.001 0.597
*

P1=P-value for test of difference in OR between PE and DVT;

P2 = P-value for test of difference in OR between the combination of PE/DVT and SVT; Bolded entries indicate a significant association of VTE with cancer at a p-value of <0.001; NHL-Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, AML-Acute myeloid leukemia; In accordance with the SEER-Medicare data use agreement, percentages are not shown for groups with fewer than 11 subjects.

The stage distribution of solid-organ cancers in relation to VTE diagnosis is shown in Table 5. A significantly higher proportion of distant stage diagnoses were observed among individuals with VTE diagnosed <1 year prior to cancer diagnosis, compared to cases without VTE, for cancers of the lung (60.5% vs. 52.9%, p<0.001), stomach (44.7% vs. 35.5%, p=0.024) and pancreatic cancer (74.4% vs. 59.7%, p<0.001).

Table 5.

Frequency and distribution of cancers by stage among those with and without VTE

Cancer type Local Regional Distant p-value
Lung
 No VTE 31,317 (19.7) 43,671 (27.4) 84,299 (52.9)
 VTE detected <1 year prior to cancer 205 (18.4) 236 (21.1) 676 (60.5)
 VTE detected ≥1 year prior to cancer 571 (20.2) 736 (25.9) 1527 (53.9) <0.001
Stomach
 No VTE 5,876 (31.4) 6, 187 (33.1) 6, 646 (35.5)
 VTE detected <1 year prior to cancer 36 (27.3) 37 (28.0) 59 (44.7)
 VTE detected ≥1 year prior to cancer 135 (37.6) 106 (29.5) 118 (32.9) 0.024
Small Intestine
 No VTE 1,091 (33.9) 1,165 (36.2) 962 (29.9)
 VTE detected <1 year prior to cancer 14 (43.8) 10 (31.3) 8 (25.0)
 VTE detected ≥1 year prior to cancer 28 (39.4) 25 (35.2) 18 (25.4) 0.652
Colon
 No VTE 41,919 (41.9) 39,974 (40.0) 18,040 (18.1)
 VTE detected <1 year prior to cancer 288 (42.2) 259 (37.9) 135 (19.8)
 VTE detected ≥1 year prior to cancer 979 (43.6) 909 (40.4) 360 (16.0) 0.077
Gallbladder
 No VTE 1,194 (34.6) 1,097 (31.7) 1,165 (33.7)
 VTE detected <1 year prior to cancer 12 (24.5) 12 (24.5) 25 (51.0)
 VTE detected ≥1 year prior to cancer 26 (38.2) 20 (29.4) 22 (32.4) 0.140
Pancreatic
 No VTE 2,745 (10.6) 7,716 (29.7) 15,524 (59.7)
 VTE detected <1 year prior to cancer 27 (8.7) 53 (16.9) 232 (74.4)
 VTE detected ≥1 year prior to cancer 72 (11.3) 172 (27.1) 391 (61.6) <0.001
Soft Tissue
 No VTE 2,368 (57.1) 1,134 (27.4) 643 (15.5)
 VTE detected <1 year prior to cancer 19 (47.5) 11 (27.5) 10 (25.0)
 VTE detected ≥1 year prior to cancer 59 (60.8) 26 (26.8) 12 (12.4) 0.430
Melanoma
 No VTE 20,073 (79.9) 3,781 (15.0) 1,281 (5.1)
 VTE detected <1 year prior to cancer 88 (77.2) 20 (17.5) 6 (5.3)
 VTE detected ≥1 year prior to cancer 423 (78.5) 91 (16.9) 25 (4.6) 0.719
Ovary
 No VTE 1,485 (10.5) 940 (6.7) 11,706 (82.8)
 VTE detected <1 year prior to cancer 16 (9.4) 13 (7.7) 141 (82.9)
 VTE detected ≥1 year prior to cancer 23 (8.6) 14 (5.2) 231 (86.2) 0.637
Kidney/Renal Pelvis
 No VTE 11,920 (53.7) 5,224 (23.6) 5,040 (22.7)
 VTE detected <1 year prior to cancer 97 (51.6) 45 (23.9) 46 (24.5)
 VTE detected ≥1 year prior to cancer 234 (53.7) 93 (21.3) 109 (25.0) 0.684
*

Cases with missing stage information are excluded from the table

Discussion

In our case-control study of over 1 million cancer cases of elderly individuals in the United States, we demonstrate a 15% increased risk of any cancer diagnosis associated with a prior diagnosis of VTE. This increased risk was not present for all cancers but instead was restricted to a large and somewhat heterogeneous subgroup of malignancies: cancers of the lung, stomach, small intestine, colon, gallbladder, pancreas, soft tissue, ovary, and kidney/renal pelvis, as well as for melanoma, NHL, myeloma, and AML. The elevated risks were generally stronger in the 1-year period following VTE diagnosis. Nonetheless, the risk of colon cancer, pancreatic cancer, and myeloma remained significantly elevated after more than 6 years of follow-up time.

The strongly elevated risk of cancer less than 1 year after VTE diagnosis observed in this study is consistent with results from prior population-based and hospital-based studies.(1115) These previous studies have also shown distinct associations with cancers of digestive tract, pancreas, and NHL, as observed in our study. The short-term associations may be due to medical practice patterns in which clinicians search for cancer in people presenting with VTE. Prompted by VTE, screening tests such as colonoscopy or chest and abdominal/pelvic computed tomography scans could lead to diagnosis of previously unsuspected and asymptomatic malignancies.

Since cancer can itself cause VTE, an additional explanation is that VTE is a presenting manifestation of cancer and is diagnosed simultaneously with or slightly before the cancer. Many of the cancers diagnosed concurrently with VTE present at an advanced stage. (7, 14) Indeed, we demonstrated that a larger proportion of lung, stomach, and pancreatic cancers diagnosed within 1 year of VTE presented with distant metastases, compared to when there was no history of VTE. Conversely, several large registry-based studies documented a significantly higher risk of VTE following diagnosis and treatment of these cancer types as well as kidney cancer, ovarian cancer, NHL, and myeloma.(5, 6, 22) Furthermore, a separate study of over 66,000 cancer cases identified a near two-fold increased risk of VTE associated with distant metastases as compared to a localized malignancy. (23) Mechanistic studies have shown higher concentrations of pro-coagulant factors among individuals diagnosed with cancer. (24, 25) Therefore, the short-term associations of VTE with cancer risk are most likely driven by a combination of enhanced screening for cancer among individuals with VTE (which would lead to detection of early stage cancers) and reverse causation (i.e., cancer causing VTE, with some cases manifesting aggressive biology and advanced stage).

In contrast, the long-term association of VTE with risk of cancer of the digestive tract and hematologic malignancies, for a period of greater than six years following VTE, cannot be readily explained by screening or reverse causation. Unlike the short-term associations with cancer risk, these longer-term associations have not been observed consistently in prior studies. (11, 14, 1618) Nonetheless, one plausible explanation is that the VTE may be caused by small, slow-growing tumor precursors that exist for extended periods of time. Such precursor tumors may induce procoagulant activity, possibly through production of cytokines and other molecular factors. (26) Of interest, the three cancers in our study that were associated with VTE over a long latency period have a prolonged pre-cancerous phase. Specifically, colon cancer is preceded by pre-neoplastic polyps, pancreatic cancer develops over more than a decade, and myeloma is preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of underdetermined significance (MGUS). (2729) Indeed, an elevated rate of VTE and arterial thrombosis has been reported among those diagnosed with MGUS, which persists for up to ten years after MGUS diagnosis.(3032) Furthermore, elevated serum concentrations of prothrombin fragment 1 and 2 are associated with increased risk of digestive tract cancers.(33)

We found very little difference in cancer risk by VTE subtype. This observation is mostly in agreement with a previous study that also assessed VTE subtype-specific associations. (18) However, we observed a higher risk of NHL and AML associated with DVT than PE. While PE is a more severe VTE event that results in higher mortality than DVT, a biological basis for these differences in cancer risk is unclear. Notably, the otherwise general lack of difference in cancer risk by VTE subtype reinforces the need to consider all VTEs, including SVT, with equal importance as they relate to cancer risk.

This study also has several limitations. First, we lacked information on some risk factors which could confound the observed associations. Smoking and obesity both increase the risk of VTE in general and are identified risk factors for the development of cancers of the lung, stomach, pancreas, colon, and ovary. (2, 3443) In addition to smoking and obesity, other co-morbid conditions that occur at an elevated rate in this elderly population may also play a role as potential confounders. Second, our study was limited to people aged 66 years and older, and we could not ascertain the occurrence of VTE prior to the age of 65. The high prevalence of other cancer risk factors in this elderly Medicare population may explain why the associations observed in our study are weaker than relative risks estimated in other, mostly younger, populations.(11, 17) Third, since information on VTE subtype was based on billing claims submitted by health care providers, rather than a detailed medical record abstraction, there may be some misclassification of VTE subtypes.

This study has several strengths including the large sample size and population-based selection of cases and controls. Furthermore, because we included a large representative sample of elderly adults our results are directly relevant to this population, among whom both VTE and cancer are disproportionately common. In addition, the large sample of this study allowed for systematic evaluation across a range of multiple cancer types. However, given the rarity of VTE, some true associations may have failed to reach statistical significance.

The association of VTE with subsequent diagnosis of cancer, as well as the increased mortality of individuals with cancer who were previously diagnosed with VTE, has led to the suggested use of enhanced cancer screening strategies among individuals diagnosed with VTE. This approach may be most relevant for those cancers with an asymptomatic precursor condition and for which we observed associations with VTE over a latency period of several years (i.e., colon and pancreatic cancers, myeloma). A number of prospective and retrospective studies have indeed demonstrated that the use of basic screening strategies such as physical examination, CT scans, or targeted laboratory testing among individuals diagnosed with unprovoked or idiopathic VTE results in early detection of malignancies, particularly those of the pelvis and abdomen.(4446) However, a small randomized trial assessing the effect of targeted screening among individuals with VTE showed no increased benefit of early detection on survival.(47) Therefore, cancer screening among individuals with VTE may only increase the lead-time in detecting cancer and may not improve survival among individuals diagnosed early with cancer.

In conclusion, we observed an elevated risk of specific solid-organ and hematologic cancers. The associations were most notable within 1 year following VTE diagnosis, and several cancers were more likely to present with distant metastases when they manifested in this short interval. The elevated risk of three cancers (colon and pancreatic cancers, myeloma) was significant at a period of more than 6 years following VTE diagnosis. Our study lends epidemiologic support to the view that cancer is related to the development of VTE. Additional studies are needed to better understand the underlying biological mechanisms and evaluate the potential clinical role of VTE as an early predictor for the development of cancer.

Acknowledgments

This study used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors acknowledge the efforts of the Applied Research Program, National Cancer Institute; the Office of Research, Development, and Information, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; Information Management Services, Inc.; and the SEER Program tumor registries in the creation of the SEER-Medicare database. We thank Winnie Ricker (Information Management Services, Rockville, MD) for assistance with database management.

Funding Sources

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute at the US National Institutes of Health.

The authors would like to thank Winnie Ricker at Information Management Services (IMS) for assistance with management and analysis of the SEER-Medicare dataset.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest:

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Financial Disclosures:

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (M Marks).

References

  • 1.Lyman GH, Khorana AA. Cancer, clots and consensus: new understanding of an old problem. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4821–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107:I4–8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078468.11849.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ., 3rd Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:585–93. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.6.585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anderson FA, Jr, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, Hosmer DW, Patwardhan NA, Jovanovic B, et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:933–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ., 3rd Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:809–15. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.6.809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Walker AJ, Card TR, West J, Crooks C, Grainge MJ. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer - a cohort study using linked United Kingdom databases. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1404–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sorensen HT, Mellemkjaer L, Olsen JH, Baron JA. Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1846–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012213432504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blom JW, Doggen CJ, Osanto S, Rosendaal FR. Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. Jama. 2005;293:715–22. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.6.715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Levitan N, Dowlati A, Remick SC, Tahsildar HI, Sivinski LD, Beyth R, et al. Rates of initial and recurrent thromboembolic disease among patients with malignancy versus those without malignancy. Risk analysis using Medicare claims data. Medicine (Baltimore) 1999;78:285–91. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199909000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stein PD, Beemath A, Meyers FA, Skaf E, Sanchez J, Olson RE. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with cancer. Am J Med. 2006;119:60–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.06.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Baron JA, Gridley G, Weiderpass E, Nyren O, Linet M. Venous thromboembolism and cancer. Lancet. 1998;351:1077–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)10018-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nordstrom M, Lindblad B, Anderson H, Bergqvist D, Kjellstrom T. Deep venous thrombosis and occult malignancy: an epidemiological study. BMJ. 1994;308:891–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Buller HR, Cogo A, Prins MH, Cattelan AM, et al. Deep-vein thrombosis and the incidence of subsequent symptomatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1128–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210153271604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sorensen HT, Mellemkjaer L, Steffensen FH, Olsen JH, Nielsen GL. The risk of a diagnosis of cancer after primary deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1169–73. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804233381701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.White RH, Chew HK, Zhou H, Parikh-Patel A, Harris D, Harvey D, et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in the year before the diagnosis of cancer in 528,693 adults. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1782–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.15.1782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Douketis JD, Gu C, Piccioli A, Ghirarduzzi A, Pengo V, Prandoni P. The long-term risk of cancer in patients with a first episode of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:546–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Murchison JT, Wylie L, Stockton DL. Excess risk of cancer in patients with primary venous thromboembolism: a national, population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:92–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sorensen HT, Svaerke C, Farkas DK, Christiansen CF, Pedersen L, Lash TL, et al. Superficial and deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and subsequent risk of cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:586–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002;40:IV-3–18. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000020942.47004.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Ricker W, Wheeler W, Parsons R, Warren JL. Use of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare data to conduct case-control studies of cancer among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:860–70. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Morton LM, Turner JJ, Cerhan JR, Linet MS, Treseler PA, Clarke CA, et al. Proposed classification of lymphoid neoplasms for epidemiologic research from the Pathology Working Group of the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph) Blood. 2007;110:695–708. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-11-051672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, Kuderer NM, Lyman GH. Frequency, risk factors, and trends for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer. 2007;110:2339–46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Blom JW, Vanderschoot JP, Oostindier MJ, Osanto S, van der Meer FJ, Rosendaal FR. Incidence of venous thrombosis in a large cohort of 66,329 cancer patients: results of a record linkage study. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:529–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01804.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Auwerda JJ, Sonneveld P, de Maat MP, Leebeek FW. Prothrombotic coagulation abnormalities in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2007;92:279–80. doi: 10.3324/haematol.10454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rickles FR, Hair GA, Zeff RA, Lee E, Bona RD. Tissue factor expression in human leukocytes and tumor cells. Thromb Haemost. 1995;74:391–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Silverstein R, Nachman R. Cancer and clotting: Trousseau’s warning. New England Journal of Medicine. 1992;327:1163–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210153271611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Landgren O, Korde N. Multiple myeloma precursor disease: current clinical and epidemiological insights and future opportunities. Oncology (Williston Park) 2011;25:589–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yachida S, Jones S, Bozic I, Antal T, Leary R, Fu B, et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2010;467:1114–7. doi: 10.1038/nature09515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Preisinger AC, Leppert M, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:525–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198809013190901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gregersen H, Norgaard M, Severinsen MT, Engebjerg MC, Jensen P, Sorensen HT. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of venous thromboembolism. Eur J Haematol. 2011;86:129–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2010.01539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Muslimani AA, Spiro TP, Chaudhry AA, Taylor HC, Jaiyesimi I, Daw HA. Venous thromboembolism in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2009;7:827–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kristinsson SY, Fears TR, Gridley G, Turesson I, Mellqvist UH, Bjorkholm M, et al. Deep vein thrombosis after monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;112:3582–6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-151076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Miller GJ, Bauer KA, Howarth DJ, Cooper JA, Humphries SE, Rosenberg RD. Increased incidence of neoplasia of the digestive tract in men with persistent activation of the coagulant pathway. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2:2107–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.01011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dela Cruz CS, Tanoue LT, Matthay RA. Lung cancer: epidemiology, etiology, and prevention. Clin Chest Med. 2011;32:605–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2011.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ladeiras-Lopes R, Pereira AK, Nogueira A, Pinheiro-Torres T, Pinto I, Santos-Pereira R, et al. Smoking and gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:689–701. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9132-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yang P, Zhou Y, Chen B, Wan HW, Jia GQ, Bai HL, et al. Overweight, obesity and gastric cancer risk: results from a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:2867–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Patel AV, Rodriguez C, Bernstein L, Chao A, Thun MJ, Calle EE. Obesity, recreational physical activity, and risk of pancreatic cancer in a large U.S. Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:459–66. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tranah GJ, Holly EA, Wang F, Bracci PM. Cigarette, cigar and pipe smoking, passive smoke exposure, and risk of pancreatic cancer: a population-based study in the San Francisco Bay Area. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:138. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bardou M, Barkun AN, Martel M. Obesity and colorectal cancer. Gut. 2013;62:933–47. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Botteri E, Iodice S, Bagnardi V, Raimondi S, Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P. Smoking and colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Jama. 2008;300:2765–78. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Olsen CM, Nagle CM, Whiteman DC, Ness R, Pearce CL, Pike MC, et al. Obesity and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: evidence from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:251–62. doi: 10.1530/ERC-12-0395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Beral V, Gaitskell K, Hermon C, Moser K, Reeves G, Peto R. Ovarian cancer and smoking: individual participant meta-analysis including 28,114 women with ovarian cancer from 51 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:946–56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70322-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Anderson FA, Jr, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107:I9–16. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078469.07362.E6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Carrier M, Le Gal G, Wells PS, Fergusson D, Ramsay T, Rodger MA. Systematic review: the Trousseau syndrome revisited: should we screen extensively for cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism? Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:323–33. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-5-200809020-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cornuz J, Pearson SD, Creager MA, Cook EF, Goldman L. Importance of findings on the initial evaluation for cancer in patients with symptomatic idiopathic deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:785–93. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-10-199611150-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Monreal M, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Bonet M, Fernandez-Llamazares J, Muchart J, et al. Screening for occult cancer in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2:876–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00721.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Piccioli A, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Falanga A, Scannapieco GL, Ieran M, et al. Extensive screening for occult malignant disease in idiopathic venous thromboembolism: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2:884–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00720.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES