Skip to main content
International Journal of Stem Cells logoLink to International Journal of Stem Cells
. 2010 May;3(2):69–73. doi: 10.15283/ijsc.2010.3.2.69

Roles of Spheroid Formation of Hepatocytes in Liver Tissue Engineering

Hu-Lin Jiang 1, You-Kyoung Kim 2, Ki-Hyun Cho 3, Young-Chul Jang 3, Yun-Jaie Choi 2, Jong-Hoon Chung 4, Chong-Su Cho 2,
PMCID: PMC4021799  PMID: 24855543

Abstract

The liver plays an important role in a broad spectrum of physiological functions and detoxifies endogenous and exogenous substances. The liver failure is associated with a high risk of mortality because it is one of important organs in our body. Various bioartificial liver (BAL) systems have been used for clinical trials as a bridge for liver transplantations in patients with liver failure. Long term and stable liver-specific functions of hepatocytes in the development of BAL support systems should be considered. Spheroid formation of hepatocytes enhances liver-specific functions. In this review, hepatocyte spheroid formation methods such as galactose density, topology of extracellular matrix, micro-molding technique, hanging-drop culture, non-adhesive surface, positive charged surface, spinner culture, rocked technique, medium component, external forces, coculture system and polymeric nanospheres are explained for enhancing liver-specific functions.

Keywords: Spheroid, Hepatocyte, Liver function, Tissue engineering, Extracellular matrix

Introduction

The liver plays an important role in a broad spectrum of physiological functions such as metabolism, storage, synthesis and release of vitamins, carbohydrates, proteins, lipids and cyclic tetrapyrroles (1). The liver also detoxifies and inactivates endogenous and exogenous substances such as toxins and metals, and activates proenzymes and coagulation factors (2). Furthermore, the liver produces bile involved in intestinal lipid absorption and secretes a majority of circulating plasma proteins. Therefore, the liver is one of important organs in our body and liver failure is associated with a high risk of mortality. Currently, the only effective way for liver failure is liver transplantation (3). Because of shortage of organ availability, it is necessary to find alternative ways to temporarily support the failing liver until a compatible donor can be found. Various bioartificial liver (BAL) systems have been used for clinical trials as a bridge for liver transplantations in patients with liver failure (4). Long term and stable liver-specific functions of hepatocytes should be considered in the development of BAL support systems.

Spheroid culture is very effective in the upregulation of liver-specific functions of hepatocytes due to the high similarity to real tissues in many aspects than monolayer cells although the diffusion limitation of oxygen and nutrients by the big size of spheroid of hepatocytes should be considered. In this review, spheroid formation methods of hepatocytes in the extracellular matrix (ECM) are covered for enhancing liver-specific functions.

Spheroid formation of hepatocytes galactose density

Kobayashi et al. (5) reported that galactose-derivatized polystyrene (PS), poly(N-p-vinylbenzyl-4-O-β-D-galactopyranosyl-D-gluconamide (PVLA) is an excellent artificial ECM for hepatocytes because it guides hepatocyte adhesion through the asialoglycoprotein receptors (ASGPR)-galactose interaction between ASGPR of hepatocytes and highly concentrated galactose moieties along the polymer chains. Also, they reported that morphologies of hepatocytes adhered to PVLA at the lower galactose density (0.5 μg/ml) showed spreaded shapes whereas the morphologies of hepatocytes adhered to PVLA at the higher galactose (100 μg/ml) showed round ones and the round morphologies of hepatocytes were found to trigger the spheroid formation in the presence of epidermal growth factor (EGF) (6). Yin et al. (7) also reported that hepatocytes formed hepatocyte spheroids 1 day after cell seeding with better liver-functions at a high galactose density of 513 nmol/cm2 on the PET surface as an artificial ECM, suggesting that spheroid formation of hepatocytes is dependent on the galactose density in the artificial ECM.

Topology of ECM

Many researches have been focused on the design of ECM topology for the spheroid formation of hepatocytes because the topology of ECM affects cell morphology and this structure resembles the tight cell-cell contact in native liver and tight junctions (8). It is generally known that three-dimensional ECMs more induce spheroid formation of hepatocytes with better differentiated functions than two-dimensional ones due to the provision of better model systems for physiologic situations (9).

Chua et al. prepared highly porous nanofiber scaffolds by electrospinning of poly (epsilon-caprolactone-co-ethyl ethylene phosphate) (PCLEEP) and introduced galactose onto the nanofiber surface (10). The results indicated that hepatocytes cultured on galactosylated nanofiber scaffold formed smaller aggregates of 20∼100 microm, resulting in an integrated spheroid-nanofiber construct. Feng et al. prepared nanofibrous galactosylated chitosan (GC) scaffolds by electrospinning and evaluated liver functions (11). The results indicated that hepatocytes cultured on GC nanofibrous scaffold formed stably spheroid formation and exhibited high liver-specific functions.

Recently, Takahashi et al. prepared collagen- or Matrigel- nanopillar sheets and evaluated liver functions (12). The results indicated that the hepatocytes cultured on collagen- or Matrigel-coated nanopillar sheets formed spheroids with higher structural polarity and functional bile canaliculi compared with conventional two-dimensional culture method.

Micromolding technique

Microfabrication is an emerging and powerful technique for spheroid formation of hepatocytes with well-controlled size and geometry. Microwells of defined size and aspect ratio can be fabricated by micromolding on cell-non-adhesive inert polymers like agarose (13) and poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) (14) for the spheroid formation of hepatocytes. Makazawa et al. fabricated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) chip having microcavities by a photo-lithography technique and evaluated liver-specific functions (15). The results indicated that most hepatocytes formed a single spheroid in each cavity until 3 days of culture and the spheroid configuration was maintained for at least 14 days of culture. Also, liver-specific functions such as albumin secretion, ammonia removal and ethoxyresorufin O-dealkylase activity of hepatocytes on the PDMS chip were higher than those of a monolayer dish. Miyamoto et al. developed a cell array technique by two combined innovations composed of micropatterning by a hydrophilic polymer and use of bovine carotid artery-derived HH cells as feeder cells for the formation of hepatocyte spheroid (16). The results showed that the rat hepatocytes formed spheroids on the cryopreserved HH cell array and the CYP3A drug metabolism activities of the hepatocytes were well maintained on the cryopre-served and cell arrays. Yoshimoto et al. prepared inverted cell patterned surface using PEG gel by a photolitho-graphic technique and seeded hepatoma cells on the constructed surface (17). The results showed that spheroids of the cells were formed on the unmodified PEG gel domains without feeder cells. Cocultures of HepG2 and Balb/3T3 (18), hepatocytes and mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells (19), and fetal mouse liver cells and nonparenchymal liver cells (20) on the micropatterned surfaces were performed to enhance more liver-specific functions than micropatterned ones with monocultures.

Hanging-drop culture

Lin et al. used hanging-drop culture of hepatocytes to form spheroid formation although the method was initially developed for culture of stem cell embryoid bodies. The technique is useful for generation of spheroid formation of defined sizes, cell numbers and composition although it is labor-intensive and difficult for massive production (21).

Non-adhesive surface

The spheroid formation of hepatocytes was obtained by culturing on a non-adhesive substratum such as poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (22), alginate (23), and agarose (24) owing to enhancing the cell-cell interaction although it is not easy to control the size of hepatocyte spheroid.

Positive charged surface

Tzanakakis et al. (25) reported that hepatocytes cultured on positively charged surfaces (Falcon Primaria) adhered to form a monolayer with spreading shapes on day 1 and the hepatocytes underwent spheroid formation after 48h through actin filament-mediated tissue reorganization. Verma et al. (26) also reported that HepG2 cells cultured on chitosan surfaces with appropriate seeding density resulted in the spheroid formation and exhibited higher amount of albumin and urea synthesis compared to uncoated dishes. However, Matsushita et al. (27) reported that primary human fetal hepatocytes did not form spheroids on a poly (L-lysine)- or poly (L-arginine)-coated dish that had a positively charged surface whereas the cells formed spheroids on a poly (L-glutamic acid)- or poly (L-aspartic acid)-coated dish that had a negatively charged surface.

Spinner culture

Spinner culture systems were used to form large numbers of hepatocyte.

Spheroids (28) although they can experience a strong shear force. To overcome the problem, a rotational cell culture was recently used (29).

Rocked technique

Brophy et al. (30) used rocked technique to induce spheroid formation of hepatocytes. The spheroid formation by rocked technique was more rapid and more efficient than rotational technique. The hepatocyte spheroids in rocked culture showed stable expression of over 80% of 242 liver-related genes.

Medium component

Medium components have been used to enhance spheroid formation of hepatocytes. The round shapes of hepatocytes were found to trigger the spheroid formation in the presence of EGF (6), HGF and sodium butylate (31), collagen (32), dexamethasone (33) and Eudragit (34).

External forces

External forces such as dielectrophoresis (35), magnetic fields (36) and ultrasound trap (37, 38) were used to enhance cell aggregation and spheroid formation from single cells although specialized equipment is necessary in spheroid formation of the cells. Spheroid formation of HepG2 adhered on a PHEMA-coated surface and encapsulated in alginate capsules was formed within 30 and 5 min, respectively, by the ultrasound trap with good liver-specific functions (37).

Coculture system

Heterotypic cell interactions between parenchymal cells and nonparenchymal neighbors are of fundamental importance in physiology (39) and tissue engineering (40) because coculture of hepatocytes with other cells enhances spheroid formation of hepatocytes and liver-specific functions. Coculture of rat hepatocytes with pancreatic islets (41) and rat hepatocytes with NIH/3T3 fibroblasts (42, 43) enhanced spheroid formation and functions of hepatocytes.

Polymeric nanosphere

Gwak et al. (44) developed a new method for the effective spheroid formation of hepatocytes by addition of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanospheres to hepatocyte cultures in spinner flasks although the mechanism is not clear.

Conclusion and perspectives

Accumulated evidence showed that spheroid formation of hepatocytes is very effective in the enhancement of liver-specific functions of hepatocytes. The spheroid formation of hepatocytes will contribute to liver tissue engineering because they induce long term and stable liver-specific functions of hepatocytes although several obstacles should be overcome. First, diffusion limitation of nutrients and oxygen to the big size of spheroid should be considered. Second, spheroid studies are needed to correlate how well the system represents real tissues because spheroid formation is an artificially reconstructed system. Spheroid formation-based 3-D culture systems continue to advance in all aspects, including new applications in combination with micro-electro-mechanical systems and new drug evaluation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Laboratory Project (ROA-2010-00-8428) from the Ministry of Education, and Science and Technology.

Footnotes

Potential conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicting financial interest.

References

  • 1.Zakim D, Boyer TD, editors. A Textbook of Liver Disease (Vol l) Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1990. Hepatology. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Davis MW, Vacanti JP. Toward development of an implantable tissue engineered liver. Biomaterials. 1996;17:365–372. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85575-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Millis JM, Losanoff JE. Technology insight: liver support systems. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;2:398–405. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yu CB, Pan XP, Li LJ. Progress in bioreactors of bioartificial livers. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2009;8:134–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kobayashi A, Kobayashi K, Akaike T. Control of adhesion and detachment of parenchymal liver cells using lactose-carrying polystyrene as substratum. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1992;3:499–508. doi: 10.1163/156856292x00466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tobe S, Takei Y, Kobayashi K, Akaike T. Receptor-mediated formation of multilayer aggregates of primary cultured adult rat hepatocytes on lactose-substituted polystyrene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;184:225–230. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)91182-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yin C, Liao K, Mao HQ, Leong KW, Zhuo RX, Chan V. Adhesion contact dynamics of HepG2 cells on galactose-immobilized substrates. Biomaterials. 2003;24:837–850. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00416-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berthiaume F, Moghe PV, Toner M, Yarmush ML. Effect of extracellular matrix topology on cell structure, function, and physiological responsiveness: hepatocytes cultured in a sandwich configuration. FASEB J. 1996;10:1471–1484. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.10.13.8940293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu FJ, Friend JR, Remmel RP, Cerra FB, Hu WS. Enhanced cytochrome P450 IA1 activity of self-assembled rat hepatocyte spheroids. Cell Transplant. 1999;8:233–246. doi: 10.1177/096368979900800304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chua KN, Lim WS, Zhang P, Lu H, Wen J, Ramakrishna S, Leong KW, Mao HQ. Stable immobilization of rat hepatocyte spheroids on galactosylated nanofiber scaffold. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2537–2547. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Feng ZQ, Chu X, Huang NP, Wang T, Wang Y, Shi X, Ding Y, Gu ZZ. The effect of nanofibrous galactosylated chitosan scaffolds on the formation of rat primary hepatocyte aggregates and the maintenance of liver function. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2753–2763. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Takahashi R, Sonoda H, Tabata Y, Hisada A. Formation of hepatocyte spheroids with structural polarity and functional bile canaliculi using nanopillar sheets. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16:1983–1995. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dean DM, Napolitano AP, Youssef J, Morgan JR. Rods, tori, and honeycombs: the directed self-assembly of microtissues with prescribed microscale geometries. FASEB J. 2007;21:4005–4012. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-8710com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fukuda J, Sakai Y, Nakazawa K. Novel hepatocyte culture system developed using microfabrication and collagen/polyethylene glycol microcontact printing. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1061–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nakazawa K, Izumi Y, Fukuda J, Yasuda T. Hepatocyte spheroid culture on a polydimethylsiloxane chip having microcavities. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006;17:859–873. doi: 10.1163/156856206777996853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miyamoto Y, Ikeya T, Enosawa S. Preconditioned cell array optimized for a three-dimensional culture of hepatocytes. Cell Transplant. 2009;18:677–681. doi: 10.1177/096368970901805-624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yoshimoto K, Ichino M, Nagasaki Y. Inverted pattern formation of cell microarrays on poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) gel patterned surface and construction of hepatocyte spheroids on unmodified PEG gel microdomains. Lab Chip. 2009;9:1286–1289. doi: 10.1039/b818610n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kikuchi K, Sumaru K, Edahiro J, Ooshima Y, Sugiura S, Takagi T, Kanamori T. Stepwise assembly of micro-patterned co-cultures using photoresponsive culture surfaces and its application to hepatic tissue arrays. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;103:552–561. doi: 10.1002/bit.22253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Torisawa YS, Mosadegh B, Luker GD, Morell M, O’Shea KS, Takayama S. Microfluidic hydrodynamic cellular patterning for systematic formation of co-culture spheroids. Integr Biol (Camb) 2009;1:649–654. doi: 10.1039/b915965g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kojima R, Yoshimoto K, Takahashi E, Ichino M, Miyoshi H, Nagasaki Y. Spheroid array of fetal mouse liver cells constructed on a PEG-gel micropatterned surface: upregulation of hepatic functions by co-culture with nonparenchymal liver cells. Lab Chip. 2009;9:1991–1993. doi: 10.1039/b903388b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lin RZ, Chou LF, Chien CC, Chang HY. Dynamic analysis of hepatoma spheroid formation: roles of E-cadherin and beta1-integrin. Cell Tissue Res. 2006;324:411–422. doi: 10.1007/s00441-005-0148-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Takezawa T, Yamazaki M, Mori Y, Yonaha T, Yoshizato K. Morphological and immuno-cytochemical characterization of a hetero-spheroid composed of fibroblasts and hepatocytes. J Cell Sci. 1992;101:495–501. doi: 10.1242/jcs.101.3.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang J, Goto M, Ise H, Cho CS, Akaike T. Galactosylated alginate as a scaffold for hepatocytes entrapment. Biomaterials. 2002;23:471–479. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00129-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hasebe Y, Okumura N, Koh T, Kazama H, Watanabe G, Seki T, Ariga T. Formation of rat hepatocyte spheroids on agarose. Hepatol Res. 2005;32:89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.hepres.2005.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tzanakakis ES, Hansen LK, Hu WS. The role of actin filaments and microtubules in hepatocyte spheroid self-assembly. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2001;48:175–189. doi: 10.1002/1097-0169(200103)48:3<175::AID-CM1007>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Verma P, Verma V, Ray P, Ray AR. Formation and characterization of three dimensional human hepatocyte cell line spheroids on chitosan matrix for in vitro tissue engineering applications. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2007;43:328–337. doi: 10.1007/s11626-007-9045-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Matsushita T, Nakano K, Nishikura Y, Higuchi K, Kiyota A, Ueoka R. Spheroid formation and functional restoration of human fetal hepatocytes on poly-amino acid-coated dishes after serial proliferation. Cytotechnology. 2003;42:57–66. doi: 10.1023/B:CYTO.0000009819.28689.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nyberg SL, Hardin J, Amiot B, Argikar UA, Remmel RP, Rinaldo P. Rapid, large-scale formation of porcine hepatocyte spheroids in a novel spheroid reservoir bioartificial liver. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:901–910. doi: 10.1002/lt.20446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nelson LJ, Walker SW, Hayes PC, Plevris JN. Low-shear modelled microgravity environment maintains morphology and differentiated functionality of primary porcine hepatocyte cultures. Cells Tissues Organs. 2010;192:125–140. doi: 10.1159/000308893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brophy CM, Luebke-Wheeler JL, Amiot BP, Khan H, Remmel RP, Rinaldo P, Nyberg SL. Rat hepatocyte spheroids formed by rocked technique maintain differentiated hepatocyte gene expression and function. Hepatology. 2009;49:578–586. doi: 10.1002/hep.22674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huang H, Hanada S, Kojima N, Sakai Y. Enhanced functional maturation of fetal porcine hepatocytes in three-dimensional poly-L-lactic acid scaffolds: a culture condition suitable for engineered liver tissues in large-scale animal studies. Cell Transplant. 2006;15:799–809. doi: 10.3727/000000006783981486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Meng Q, Wu D, Zhang G, Qiu H. Direct self-assembly of hepatocytes spheroids within hollow fibers in presence of collagen. Biotechnol Lett. 2006;28:279–284. doi: 10.1007/s10529-005-5531-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Abu-Absi SF, Hu WS, Hansen LK. Dexamethasone effects on rat hepatocyte spheroid formation and function. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:415–426. doi: 10.1089/ten.2005.11.415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kamihira M, Yamada K, Hamamoto R, Iijima S. Spheroid formation of hepatocytes using synthetic polymer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;831:398–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb52213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sebastian A, Buckle AM, Markx GH. Tissue engineering with electric fields: immobilization of mammalian cells in multilayer aggregates using dielectrophoresis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;98:694–700. doi: 10.1002/bit.21416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ino K, Ito A, Honda H. Cell patterning using magnetite nanoparticles and magnetic force. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;97:1309–1317. doi: 10.1002/bit.21322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu J, Kuznetsova LA, Edwards GO, Xu J, Ma M, Purcell WM, Jackson SK, Coakley WT. Functional three-dimensional HepG2 aggregate cultures generated from an ultra-sound trap: comparison with HepG2 spheroids. J Cell Biochem. 2007;102:1180–1189. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bazou D. Biochemical properties of encapsulated high-density 3-D HepG2 aggregates formed in an ultrasound trap for application in hepatotoxicity studies: Biochemical responses of encapsulated 3-D HepG2 aggregates. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2010;26:127–141. doi: 10.1007/s10565-009-9123-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.van Breemen C, Skarsgard P, Laher I, McManus B, Wang X. Endothelium-smooth muscle interactions in blood vessels. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1997;24:989–992. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1997.tb02737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.L’Heureux N, Pâquet S, Labbé R, Germain L, Auger FA. A completely biological tissue-engineered human blood vessel. FASEB J. 1998;12:47–56. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.12.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lee KW, Lee SK, Joh JW, Kim SJ, Lee BB, Kim KW, Lee KU. Influence of pancreatic islets on spheroid formation and functions of hepatocytes in hepatocyte-pancreatic islet spheroid culture. Tissue Eng. 2004;10:965–977. doi: 10.1089/ten.2004.10.965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ryu KH. Liver stem cells derived from the bone marrow and umbilical cord blood. Int J Stem Cell. 2009;2:97–101. doi: 10.15283/ijsc.2009.2.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Seo SJ, Kim IY, Choi YJ, Akaike T, Cho CS. Enhanced liver functions of hepatocytes cocultured with NIH 3T3 in the alginate/galactosylated chitosan scaffold. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1487–1495. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gwak SJ, Choi D, Paik SS, Cho SW, Kim SS, Choi CY, Kim BS. A method for the effective formation of hepatocyte spheroids using a biodegradable polymer nanosphere. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;78:268–275. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Stem Cells are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Stem Cell Research

RESOURCES