Abstract
Animal models of early-life stress and variation in social experience across the lifespan have contributed significantly to our understanding of the environmental regulation of the developing brain. Plasticity in neurobiological pathways regulating stress responsivity, cognition, and reproductive behavior is apparent during the prenatal period and continues into adulthood, suggesting a lifelong sensitivity to environmental cues. Recent evidence suggests that dynamic epigenetic changes—molecular modifications that alter gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence—account for this plasticity. In this review, we highlight studies of laboratory rodents that illustrate the association between the experience of prenatal stress, maternal separation, maternal care, abusive caregiving in infancy, juvenile social housing, and adult social stress and variation in DNA methylation and histone modification. Moreover, we discuss emerging evidence for the transgenerational impact of these experiences. These experimental paradigms have yielded insights into the potential role of epigenetic mechanisms in mediating the effects of the environment on human development and also indicate that consideration of the sensitivity of laboratory animals to environmental cues may be an important factor in predicting long-term health and welfare.
Keywords: DNA methylation, epigenetic, histone modification, maternal, rodent, stress, transgenerational
Introduction
The context of early life can serve as a significant influence on development with implications for health and well-being. This context can be determined by the availability or quality of nutritional resources, exposure to toxins, nurturing social experiences, and the presence of threats or stressors in the environment. In humans, decades of longitudinal studies have suggested a link between variation in these early-life exposures and long-term risk of physical and psychiatric disease in adulthood (Tomalski and Johnson 2010). Although the effects of exposure to chemicals and/or hormones or deprivation of an essential vitamin or energy source would be predicted to have a biological effect determined by the nature of the particular exposure, it has been more challenging to discern the pathways through which nurturing, social interactions, and the experience of psychological distress are likewise capable of shaping neurobiological and behavioral outcomes associated with long-term risk. The development of animal models to study these questions has provided valuable insights into the cascade of molecular, cellular, and neurobiological changes that accompany variation in psychosocial experience.
The experimental study of the effects of social interactions and stressful life events has relied primarily on laboratory rodent models (typically involving rats and mice), although some primate work is available to provide further support of the profound effects of early-life experiences (Harlow et al. 1965; Suomi et al. 1976). The effects of prenatal stress, maternal deprivation and/or separation, variation in maternal care, juvenile social enrichment and/or isolation, and adult social stress have been explored in these models and suggest that the quality of social interactions or the experience of stress can induce neuroendocrine effects that influence social behavior, reproductive success, cognitive ability, and stress responses. Although it is clear that during prenatal and early postnatal development there is a period of enhanced sensitivity to these environmentally induced effects, there may also be plasticity beyond infancy that extends into adolescence and adulthood. An intriguing finding within these studies is the long-term effects of early- and later-life experiences on region-specific gene expression in the brain. For example, exposure to stressors during fetal development or in early infancy is associated with an upregulation of genes involved in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA1) response to stress and a downregulation of genes that exert a dampening effect on these pathways (Ladd et al. 2004; Maccari et al. 2003). These findings have led to further exploration of the molecular mechanisms involved in gene regulation that may mediate this lasting effect.
Epigenetic mechanisms provide a dynamic strategy for changing the expression of genes and are increasingly the focus of studies examining the biological pathways through which early-life experiences exert long-term effects on gene expression (Curley et al. 2011). Across species, it is evident that epigenetic effects can be induced by a variety of experiences, including the quality of social interactions and exposure to stressors. Moreover, in some cases, these developmental effects can be transmitted across generations, leading to neurobiological and behavioral variation in offspring and grand-offspring (Champagne 2008; Franklin et al. 2010). In this review, we highlight research indicating a link between social and stressful experiences occurring over the lifespan and epigenetic variation and the transgenerational implications of these effects. Although motivated by interest in determining contributions to the pathophysiology of human disease, this research is drawn primarily from studies in laboratory rodents and thus can also provide insights into the conditions of life that induce persistent biological changes in laboratory animals. We discuss the implications of findings from the now rapidly advancing study of behavioral epigenetics for laboratory animal treatment and housing conditions. Manipulating the quality of these conditions may have significant long-term consequences for animal welfare and, in particular, the stress physiology and reproductive success of laboratory animals.
Exposure to Prenatal Stress: Implications for Brain Development and Behavior
The prenatal period is a time of rapid growth and development of the fetus and thus a period of heightened plasticity. As such, adverse experiences during this period have been demonstrated to induce significant effects on neurobiology, metabolism, and physiology that can persist across the lifespan (Weinstock 2008; Weinstock et al. 1988). In rodents, prenatal stress effects can be induced through a variety of manipulations of the gestational female. Physical restraint, exposure to loud noises, bright lights, manipulation of the social environment, and predator odors have been used to induce heightened levels of circulating corticosterone in pregnant female rodents and to alter offspring development (Weinstock et al. 1988). The unpredictability and timing of these exposures is a significant predictor of the impact on maternal and offspring outcomes (Matthews 2002). Generally, the more variable the stressor and the earlier the stressors occur in the pregnancy, the more profound the effect on offspring development. The mechanism of prenatal stress effects is thought to be linked to fetal exposure to stress-induced maternal corticosterone, and studies in which the adrenal glands of prenatally stressed dams are removed provide support for this hypothesis (Barbazanges et al. 1996).
Prenatal stress has been linked to both perinatal and long-term outcomes in offspring. Increased mortality rates, smaller litter weights, and reduced litter sizes have been found after gestational stress (de Catanzaro 1988; Euker and Riegle 1973; Guo et al. 1993). The reduced pup weights associated with exposure to prenatal stress may account for metabolic dysfunction and weight gain in later life (Mueller and Bale 2006). In adulthood, a distinguishing characteristic of prenatally stressed offspring is increased activity within HPA pathways. The HPA response to stress involves neuronal activation within the hypothalamus, which triggers the release of corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF1) and vasopressin (Avp1). CRF and Avp then stimulate the release of adrenocorticotropic hormone from the pituitary. The adrenocorticotropic hormone then stimulates the release of glucocorticoids (corticosterone in rodents) from the cortex of the adrenal gland (Stratakis and Chrousos 1995). In rodents, prenatal stress has been found to exert multiple effects on the HPA response to stress, including upregulation of hypothalamic CRF and increased adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosterone levels after exposure to a stressor (Mueller and Bale 2008). Negative-feedback regulation of the HPA axis, generally achieved through the activation of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs1) in the hippocampus (Sapolsky et al. 1985), is also impaired in prenatally stressed offspring, and this impairment may account for the prolonged levels of stress-induced adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosterone found in these animals (Welberg et al. 2001).
Behaviorally, these neuroendocrine effects are associated with depressive-like and anxiety-like phenotypes that include increased immobility in a forced swim test, decreased exploration of a novel or anxiogenic environment, and altered activity levels (Weinstock 2008). Cognition is also affected in prenatally stressed offspring, likely related to some degree to the impairments in “stress coping” apparent as a consequence of prenatal stress. Reduced reproductive success among male and female offspring who experienced prenatal stress has also been demonstrated, likely mediated through reduced sexual dimorphism and alterations in responsivity to gonadal hormones (Herrenkohl 1986; Kaiser and Sachser 1998). Importantly, the degree to which this early-life manipulation will impact the brain and behavior is dependent on methodological variables, such as the type, timing, and duration of the stressor, as well as the sex, strain, and species of animal being tested.
Maternal Influences on Development
In mammals, particularly among altricial species, the postnatal period is characterized by frequent mother–infant interactions that allow for the provisioning of nutrients, warmth, and somatosensory stimulation. Disruption to these interactions has been traditionally used as a model of childhood neglect in which the impact of early-life maternal deprivation is explored. In the laboratory, the maternal separation model has been frequently used in rats and, more recently, in mice and involves prolonged periods (ranging 1–24 hours) during the early postnatal period when pups are removed from the nest and housed without contact with the dam (Lehmann et al. 2002). The immediate effect of this separation involves separation-induced elevation in corticosterone in pups (Rosenfeld et al. 1992). Separation between mother and infants can also be induced through use of a variable foraging-demand paradigm, in which the duration of time the dam must be away from the nest to obtain sufficient amounts of food is varied from day to day (Coplan et al. 2006; Coutellier et al. 2009). Complete maternal deprivation can also be used to disrupt postnatal development and can be achieved through rearing pups artificially, with nutrients, warmth, and somatosensory stimulation provided by the experimenter and no contact between the dam and pups after birth (Gonzalez et al. 2001; West 1993). Although there are wide variations in the methodological implementation of these maternal separation and/or deprivation paradigms, the consequences for offspring development typically involve alterations in neuroendocrine systems involved in the HPA response to stress. Similar to the effects of prenatal stress, postnatal maternal separation and/or deprivation is associated with an upregulation of hypothalamic CRF, downregulation of hippocampal GR, and increased stress-induced adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosterone levels (Lehmann and Feldon 2000; Lippmann et al. 2007). Dopamine, oxytocin, and serotonergic systems are also modulated by this early-life experience, and the behavioral consequences include increases in anxiety-like and depressive-like behaviors as well as impaired learning and memory (Curley et al. 2011). Overall, these studies suggest that disruption to the quality of mother–infant interactions during the postnatal period can lead to widespread neuroendocrine and behavioral consequences.
Although rodent models of maternal separation and deprivation have dominated research on the effects of early-life experience, within the laboratory it is also possible to examine the effects of increased maternal interactions during the postnatal period. Natural variations in maternal care are evident across multiple species and can be observed in laboratory rodents (Champagne, Francis, et al. 2003; Fairbanks 1989; Hane and Fox 2006). Studies in Long-Evans rats indicate that lactating dams display individual differences in licking and grooming (LG1) of pups during the postnatal period and that the experience of high levels of LG compared with low levels of LG has significant long-term effects on offspring (Meaney 2001). In adulthood, male offspring reared by high LG dams have an attenuated response to stress, are more exploratory in a novel environment, and display improved performance on cognitive tasks (Caldji, Diorio, et al. 2000; Liu et al. 1997, 2000). These behavioral effects correspond to maternal LG-associated changes in gene expression and receptor and/or protein levels, including decreased CRF in the paraventrivular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN1) and increases in GR, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF1), and modification in #57447;-aminobutyric acid pathways in the hippocampus (Caldji et al. 1998; Caldji, Francis, et al. 2000; Liu et al. 1997, 2000). Among female offspring, the experience of high levels of postnatal LG induces an upregulation of estrogen receptor alpha (ER#57441;1), oxytocin receptors, and estrogen sensitivity in the medial preoptic area of the hypothalamus (Champagne et al. 2001, 2006; Champagne, Weaver, et al. 2003). Consequent to these neurobiological changes, female offspring reared by a high LG dam display elevated levels of LG toward their own offspring. Interestingly, although high LG predicts increased maternal care in offspring, the converse is true of sexual behavior. Offspring reared by high LG dams are less sexually receptive and produce fewer litters after paced mating (Cameron, Del Corpo, et al., 2008; Cameron, Fish, et al. 2008). Thus, the experience of variation in postnatal maternal LG can lead to divergent reproductive strategies in offspring.
The quality of maternal care during the postnatal period can be modulated by a variety of environmental manipulations with implications for offspring development. In rats, maternal LG can be increased by housing postweaning females in conditions of increased social and physical enrichment (e.g., group housing with toys and a complex housing design) prior to mating (Champagne and Meaney, 2007). Conversely, LG can be decreased when female rats experience postweaning social isolation or stress during pregnancy (Champagne and Meaney 2006). In contrast with maternal separation paradigms used in rodents, which lead to disruptions in mother–infant interactions, brief separations between dams and pups (approximately 5–20 minutes in duration) during the postnatal period have been found to stimulate maternal behavior and attenuate offspring stress responses (Lehmann et al. 2002; Liu et al. 1997). In mice, adult females can be induced to increase pup-directed behavior when placed in a communal nesting paradigm (Curley et al. 2009).
Although standard laboratory rearing of rodents typically consists of a single lactating dam and her pups, under naturalistic conditions, a more common rearing strategy consists of multiple females caring for pups in a communal nest (Crowcroft and Rowe 1963). Lactating females who rear offspring communally are observed to display higher levels of nursing and pup LG during the postpartum period. Offspring reared in a communal nest are found to be more exploratory in a novel environment, display higher levels of social behavior, and have increases in hippocampal and hypothalamic nerve growth factor and BDNF (Branchi, D’Andrea, Fiore et al. 2006; Branchi, D’Andrea, Sietzema, et al. 2006; Curley et al. 2009). As adults, communally reared females display higher levels of maternal care toward their offspring and elevations in oxytocin receptor density in several hypothalamic brain regions (Curley et al. 2009). The development effects of communal rearing may be most pronounced when studying high-anxiety rodent strains and will certainly be dependent on the age of the pups within the communal nest (Branchi et al. 2009).
Animal models of abusive caretaking have been developed to explore the consequences of this form of early-life adversity and suggest that disruption to the postpartum maternal environment can increase the occurrence of aggressive mother–infant interactions. In laboratory rats, this disruption can be achieved by restricting the amount of nesting materials provided to dams during the postnatal period. This manipulation can induce reductions in maternal LG and increase the incidence of dams stepping on pups, aggressive grooming, and dragging of pups by a limb (Brunson et al. 2005; Ivy et al. 2008; Raineki et al. 2010). The long-term consequences of this experience include heightened stress responsivity and impairments in spatial memory (Avishai-Eliner et al. 2001; Brunson et al. 2005; Gilles et al. 1996; Raineki et al. 2010). Even when abusive caregiving is limited to brief contact with an abusive nonbiological mother, there are persistent effects of this adverse experience, and offspring are found to have reduced BDNF messenger RNA (mRNA1) in the prefrontal cortex (Roth et al. 2009). Thus, the quality of maternal care, not just the quantity, can have a significant impact on development, with implications for later-life functioning.
Neurobiological Impact of Social Isolation, Enrichment, and Stress
Although plasticity is certainly evident during prenatal and postnatal periods of development, the impact of later-life experiences occurring during juvenile development or in adulthood is increasingly apparent. Sensitivity to the quality of the social environment has been demonstrated in laboratory rodents exposed to postweaning social isolation and/or enrichment or adults that experience aggressive social encounters. Juvenile social isolation in rodents induces what has been referred to as an isolation syndrome, which is characterized by increases in anxiety-like and depressive-like behaviors (Heritch et al. 1990). These isolation-induced effects can be contrasted with those induced through the experience of social and physical enrichment. Increasing social and environmental complexity can, as has been previously noted, lead to increases in maternal LG (Champagne and Meaney 2007). However, this experience also has broad effects on neurobiological and behavioral outcomes, including increased synaptic plasticity, improved cognition, and reduced anxiety-like behavior (Nithianantharajah and Hannan 2006). As is the case for communal rearing, environment enrichment–induced effects may be most evident among rodents that have increased anxiety-like behavior or impairments in cognition.
Although social interactions are a critical feature of development, it is clear that the quality of those interactions (i.e., nurturing vs. abusive) is an important consideration in predicting long-term health outcomes. In adult rodents, exposure to aggressive social interactions has been used to induce increased depressive-like and anxiety-like phenotypes. The “social defeat” model is a classic example of this approach (Martinez et al. 2002; Tamashiro et al. 2005). Within this model, territorial aggression is induced by placing an “intruder” into the cage of a “resident,” typically a larger, dominant, adult male rodent (Miczek, 1979). In this paradigm, the intruder is exposed to repeated aggressive encounters and is defeated in these interactions. The consequences of social defeat for the intruder male include reduced locomotion, social avoidance, and increased HPA activity (Blanchard et al. 1993; Keeney and Hogg 1999; Meerlo et al. 1996; Raab et al. 1986). This laboratory animal model has been used to induce in rodents a depressive-like phenotype that can be effectively treated with antidepressants (Rygula et al. 2008). Social defeat can be conceptualized as a chronic stressor and induces similar phenotypes to other stressors experienced in adulthood, such as exposure to predator odor, physical restraint, and chronic variable stress (combinations of different stress-inducing environmental manipulations) (Molina et al. 1990). Overall, it is clear that susceptibility to the long-term effects of stress is not limited to early development.
Epigenetic Perspectives on the Effects of Stress and the Social Environment
Evidence for the persistent effects of early- and later-life experiences has led to increasing exploration of the molecular and cellular pathways through which these effects are achieved. The study of epigenetic mechanisms within the context of effects of social experience and stressors has provided increasing support for the hypothesis that modifications to gene expression that are observed as a consequence of these experiences may involve epigenetic pathways (Champagne 2010). In particular, variation in DNA methylation and histone modifications has been observed in offspring exposed to prenatal stress, disruption to mother–infant interactions, variation in maternal care, and adult social stress and may account for the effects of postweaning social environments on the development of juveniles. DNA methylation is typically considered a potentially enduring epigenetic modification (particularly among postmitotic cells), achieved through addition of a methyl group to cytosines within the DNA sequence, and is dependent on the enzymatic function of DNA methyltransferases (e.g., DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b) (Razin 1998; Turek-Plewa and Jagodzinski 2005; Turner 2001). In contrast, posttranslational modifications to the N-terminus tails of histone proteins are highly varied and dynamic and include acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination (Peterson and Laniel 2004). These epigenetic processes are not independent (i.e., DNA methylation can influence histone modification and vice versa) and collectively influence the accessibility of DNA to transcription factors and RNA polymerase. The consequence of an epigenetic modification for gene expression will be dependent on the location and nature of the modification and the recruitment of cofactors, although DNA methylation is typically associated with reduced transcription and histone acetylation is typically associated with increased gene expression (Figure 1). Emerging evidence indicating the plasticity and stability of epigenetic processes has contributed significantly to our understanding of the dynamic yet stable changes in the brain that are apparent in response to environmental experiences. Here we highlight research in which an epigenetic perspective has been applied to rodent models of social modulation and response to stress.
Figure 1.
Illustration of the processes of DNA methylation and histone modification. (A) DNA methylation is a process in which methyl chemicals (Me) are added to cytosines in the DNA sequence by the enzyme DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). Methylated DNA is highly compact, and DNA methylation typically leads to reduced gene expression or gene silencing. (B) The addition of an acetyl chemical (Ac) to histone proteins can loosen the interactions between histones and DNA and increase the level of gene transcription (top). In contrast, deacetylated histones cluster closely to the DNA and suppress gene expression (bottom). mRNA, messenger RNA.
Epigenetic Impact of Prenatal Stress
Chronic variable stress experienced by gestational females has been demonstrated to induce a long-term impact on HPA pathways, including altered gene expression within the hypothalamus. In mice, stress during the 1st week of pregnancy has been found to induce significant impairments in male offspring (Mueller and Bale 2008). Among male pups born to a stressed dam, CRF gene expression is increased and GR gene expression is decreased in adulthood. Analysis of DNA methylation within the promoter region of the Crf gene in hypothalamic tissue of stressed offspring versus control offspring indicates stress-induced reduction in DNA methylation. In contrast, within the promoter region of the Nr3c1 gene (encoding GR), prenatal stress is associated with increased DNA methylation. The direction of these epigenetic effects coincides well with the notion that increased DNA methylation leads to reduced gene expression. Although prenatal stress effects have been attributed to the direct exposure of the developing fetus to maternal glucocorticoids (Barbazanges et al. 1996), it is important to consider the placenta—the interface between maternal and fetal physiological systems—as a mediating mechanism of prenatal effects. The expression of DNMTs in the placenta of prenatally stressed mice has been examined, and elevations in DNMT1 were observed (Mueller and Bale 2008). Unlike the behavioral effects of this stress paradigm, stress-induced elevations in placental DNMT1 levels were observed in female offspring (with only a trend for an increase in males), which raises questions about the mechanisms of the sex specificity of prenatal stress.
Variation in Early Postnatal Experiences: Effects on DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications
Animal models of neglect, abuse, and variation in maternal care are increasingly incorporating analyses of epigenetic mechanisms to account for the persistent effects of these experiences. In mice, maternal separation (3 hours/day on postnatal days 1–10) has been found to increase Avp gene expression in the PVN, and analysis of the promoter of this gene indicates decreased DNA methylation at several cytosine nucleotides within this region (Murgatroyd et al. 2009). These epigenetic effects are apparent at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after the experience of maternal separation. Hypomethylation of the Avp gene associated with maternal separation was also associated with reduced levels of binding of MeCP2 (a protein that binds to methylated DNA). By means of a similar maternal separation paradigm, male offspring exposed to postnatal separation were found to have elevated levels of DNA methylation within the Mecp2 gene and decreased methylation within the Crf receptor (Crfr2) gene (Franklin et al. 2010). Abusive behavior toward pups has been found to induce significant changes in the epigenetic regulation of BDNF. Studies of Long-Evans rats indicate that daily exposure to 30 minutes of aggressive caregiving on postnatal days 1 through 7 is associated with increased DNA methylation of the Bdnf promoter at postnatal days 8, 30, and 90 (Roth et al. 2009). Although a limited range of targets has been explored, these initial studies suggest that epigenetic modifications, particularly DNA methylation, are associated with early-life manipulation of the quality and frequency of contact between dams and pups.
Natural variations in LG behavior in Long-Evans rats have been demonstrated to predict variation in DNA methylation and histone modifications. Male offspring reared by high LG dams have been found to have decreased DNA methylation within the promoter region of the Nr3c1 gene in hippocampal tissue (Weaver et al. 2004). Cross-fostering of pups between high and low LG dams has indicated that these epigenetic effects are related to the quality of postnatal care rather than prenatal or genetic factors. Histone acetylation is also increased within the differentially methylated region of the Nr3c1 promoter, such that among offspring reared by high LG dams there are elevated levels of histone acetylation. Within the hippocampus of high LG offspring, DNA methylation within the glutamic acid decarboxylase (Gad1) gene, the rate-limiting enzyme in #57447;-aminobutyric acid synthesis, is reduced compared with offspring reared by low LG dams (Zhang et al. 2010). Histone acetylation is likewise increased at the Gad1 promoter associated with high levels of LG. These epigenetic effects within the hippocampus may be associated with the increased levels of DNMT1 among offspring reared by low LG dams. Among female offspring, the experience of high levels of LG during the postnatal period is associated with decreased methylation within the Esr1 gene (encoding ER#57441;) promoter, and transcription factor binding to this region is increased in high LG offspring compared with low LG offspring (Champagne et al. 2006). Within the communal nursing model, communal care is associated with increased histone acetylation at the Bdnf I, IV, VI, and VII promoter regions (Branchi et al. 2011). The changes in DNA methylation and histone modification that have been linked to variation in maternal care suggest that the long-term changes in gene expression that characterize the offspring that have received high levels of maternal care versus low levels of maternal care may be maintained by these epigenetic processes.
Epigenetic Plasticity in Adolescence and Adulthood
Although plasticity in epigenetic pathways was initially thought to be limited to the early stages of embryogenesis, it is becoming increasingly evident that experiences occurring across the lifespan are capable of inducing epigenetic variation. Moreover, the capacity to modify DNA methylation and histone tails may be a critical aspect of learning and memory from infancy to adulthood (Miller and Sweatt 2007). In the context of studies on the influence of social interactions and stressors, epigenetic variation, likewise, has been associated with changes in gene expression and phenotype during the later stages of development. Among adult mice that have a genetically induced memory impairment, 4 weeks of exposure to complex housing environments was found to be associated with increased histone acetylation in the hippocampus and cortex and improvements in memory (Fischer et al. 2007). Interestingly, these enrichment-induced effects on both histones and learning and memory could also be achieved in non-memory-impaired mice with pharmacological treatments that promote histone acetylation. Histone modifications (particularly histone methylation) at the Bdnf III, IV, and VI promoter regions have also been observed in mice housed in enriched environments (Kuzumaki et al. 2011).
In contrast with environmental enrichment, which has been demonstrated to increase levels of BDNF, chronic stress is associated with reductions in the expression of this gene, and there may be an epigenetic basis to these effects. In rats, immobilization stress combined with exposure to predator odor has been found to induce significant increases in hippocampal DNA methylation within the Bdnf gene (Roth et al. 2011). Within the social defeat model, reductions in BDNF are observed a month after exposure to the social stressor, and hippocampal histone dimethylation at the Bdnf promoter may account for this effect (Tsankova et al. 2006). Histone acetylation is transiently decreased and then exhibits prolonged increases among socially defeated mice, and this effect may be associated with long-term, stress-induced reductions in histone deacetylase levels (Covington et al. 2009). Similarly, in rats, increased histone acetylation has been observed for up to 24 hours after the experience of repeated social defeat (Hollis et al. 2010). Moreover, the behavioral consequences of social defeat, such as decreased social behavior, can be reversed pharmacologically with a drug that inhibits histone deacetylases (Covington et al. 2009). Interestingly, although social defeat has been found to induce long-term effects, a percentage of mice display resilience to this stressor. In a recent study, stress-susceptible mice were found to have increased levels of CRF mRNA in the PVN and decreased DNA methylation within the Crf gene (Elliott et al. 2010). In contrast, stress-resilient mice were found to have no changes in CRF mRNA or DNA methylation of this gene. Differential susceptibility to the effects of stress are an important consideration within these studies, and there is increasing support for strain- or genotype-specific epigenetic effects as a consequence of stress (Uchida et al. 2011).
Transgenerational Impact of the Social Environment and Stress
In the previous sections, the persistent epigenetic effects of environmental experiences were illustrated. These effects appear to play a critical role in shaping neurobiological and behavioral outcomes. However, it may also be the case that these environmentally induced effects can persist across generations. Transgenerational continuity in maternal behavior may be one mechanism through which this transmission occurs (Champagne 2008). In rodents, there is evidence that abusive caregiving and variation in maternal LG can shift the development of female offspring such that these maternal traits are also observed in both offspring and grand-offspring. Maternal LG has been demonstrated to alter the DNA methylation and expression of Esr1 in the medial preoptic area of the hypothalamus of female offspring (Champagne et al. 2006). These effects emerge during the postnatal period and then persist into adulthood. In late gestation, levels of ER #57441; play a critical role in determining the responsiveness of females to circulating estrogens, and this responsiveness predicts the quality and quantity of postnatal mother–infant interactions. As a consequence of these epigenetic modifications, individual differences in maternal LG are transmitted from mother to offspring (F1 generation) and to grand-offspring (F2 generation) (Champagne 2008; Champagne and Meaney, 2007). A similar continuity of behavior has been observed across species in studies of infant abuse. In rats, the transgenerational continuity of abuse may be related to variation in DNA methylation and expression of Bdnf in the prefrontal cortex (Roth et al. 2009). Females that experience abuse in infancy have decreased Bdnf expression and increased Bdnf IV promoter DNA methylation in the prefrontal cortex, and the offspring of these females likewise have increased Bdnf IV promoter DNA methylation in the prefrontal cortex. Interestingly, cross-fostering studies suggest that the transmission of abuse and the epigenetic variation linked to this phenotype may be related to prenatal factors rather than postnatal experiences with the dam.
A second pathway through which perinatal epigenetic and behavioral effects may persist across generations is through direct inheritance of the epigenetic modification. Although it has long been assumed that there is complete erasure of epigenetic variation within the genome during the early stages of embryogenesis, the discovery of imprinted genes (genes that are expressed dependent on the parent from whom they are inherited) has led to increasing speculation that an epigenetic “memory” of the previous generation is maintained within the genome and transmitted, like genes, through the germline (Weaver et al. 2009). Epigenetic inheritance of the effect of toxicological exposures has been explored and indicates the persistence of these effects across multiple generations in the patriline (Anway et al. 2005). More recently, the transgenerational effect of maternal separation has been explored in offspring exposed to separation (F1), the offspring of separated males (F2), and the grand-offspring of separated males (F3) (Franklin et al. 2010). In this paradigm, mice were exposed to unpredictable separation from the dam during the postnatal period. Depressive-like behaviors that were induced in the F1 generation offspring were found to be present in F2 and F3 generation mice. Separation-induced DNA methylation patterns were found to be present in the sperm and brains of F1 male mice and the brains of F2 males. These epigenetic effects included hypermethylation of the Mecp2 gene and hypomethylation of the Crfr2 gene. Thus, it would appear that epigenetic variation that is induced through the quality of the early-life environment can become encoded into the germ cells, leading to a transgenerational inheritance of the effects of stress and social experiences.
Implications for Laboratory Animal Welfare
The development of laboratory animal models in which variation in social experience and exposure to stress is used to examine epigenetic effects has led to increasing exploration of the role of these molecular pathways in humans. There is increasing evidence that prenatal stress (Oberlander et al. 2008; Radtke et al. 2011) and childhood abuse (McGowan et al. 2009) can induce epigenetic variation in humans, and thus these animal models have provided essential insights into the target genes and types of epigenetic modifications that may account for these effects. However, emerging evidence from animal models can also be applied to the better understanding of the contextual variables that may alter the traits of laboratory animals, with implications for experimental design and animal welfare.
Maternal behavior of laboratory rodents exhibits a high degree of plasticity in response to environmental cues. The life history of a female, inclusive of experiences occurring from prenatal development into adulthood, can shape the neurobiological substrates of maternal behavior, and, as we have described in previous sections, there are epigenetic mechanisms that may account for these neurobiological effects. Moreover, modulation of maternal behavior can lead to epigenetic variation in offspring that can, in some cases, persist across multiple generations. These findings highlight the importance of considering the environmental factors within a laboratory context that could contribute to variation in the quality or quantity of mother–infant interactions. Transportation of pregnant females between animal facilities, temperature and humidity conditions during the postnatal period, unpredictable noise and/or disruptions, and exposure to anxiogenic olfactory cues (e.g., predator odors) can potentially have a lasting impact on maternal behavior and offspring HPA function. When the severity of these experiences is high, a suppression of reproductive success may occur. For example, in wild populations of snowshoe hares, the persistence of predator-induced reproductive suppression can be observed across generations (Krebs et al. 1995; Sheriff et al. 2010). In the lab, the effects of adversity on breeding and mortality rates will have implications for the overall health of the colony and may severely impact ongoing study of these populations. The difficulty in replicating behavioral results across animal facilities (Crabbe et al. 1999; Wahlsten et al. 2003) may be attributed to variation in the contextual cues that either promote or inhibit the frequency of mother–infant interactions.
Although social interactions are typically thought to simulate improved health and welfare, an important consideration raised by the animal models discussed in this review is the nature of that interaction. Abusive caregiving and social defeat models illustrate the long-term epigenetic impact of agonistic social experiences, whereas communal care and juvenile social enrichment demonstrate the benefits of social contact. As is the case for maternal behavior, modulation of the impact of social experiences will likely depend on contextual factors, particularly factors that increase or decrease HPA responses. Assessment of the dominance status of individual animals placed in social housing conditions may also predict the nature of the effect of subsequent social interactions. Differential responses to social context as a function of dominance status have been illustrated in primates (Morgan et al. 2002), and the social defeat model in laboratory rodents involves an application of this effect to the study of social stress. Thus, housing conditions within the laboratory and manipulations of those conditions during experimental protocols may induce molecular changes followed by a long-term impact on social and anxiety-like behaviors.
Summary
Rodent models demonstrating the effects of prenatal stress, maternal separation and/or deprivation, maternal care, infant abuse, juvenile social environment, and adult social stress have significantly advanced our understanding of the mechanistic pathways through which environmental experiences induce long-term biobehavioral consequences. In particular, these studies provide evidence for the role of epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, in mediating the effects of early- and later-life experiences. The plasticity in these mechanisms, which was once thought to be limited but has been revealed to be highly responsive to physiological and neurobiological experiences (LaPlant et al. 2010; Renthal et al. 2007), may account for the dynamic changes in neuroendocrine function that accompany variation in the quality of the social environment. In addition to being sensitive to these cues, it appears that epigenetic mechanisms can also confer the stability of environmentally mediated effects on various outcome measures—a finding that raises challenging questions about the specific molecular pathways that mediate plasticity versus stability. Although the HPA response to stress has been the focus of these studies, stress and social experiences may have a profound impact on a diverse range of phenotypic outcomes, including cognitive ability and reproductive behavior. Moreover, there is increasing evidence for the transgenerational impact of early-life experiences and the involvement of epigenetic pathways in these effects. The development of laboratory rodent models to study epigenetic effects has been instrumental to the study of epigenetic pathways in humans and will continue to serve as a critical tool for developing hypotheses about the timing, targeting, and persistence of environmentally induced effects. These studies also highlight the importance of contextual variables to the health and welfare of laboratory animals and illustrate the molecular mechanisms through which the quality of social experiences can shape development and impact variation in behavior.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (DP2OD001674).
Biography
Kathryn Gudsnuk, MSc, is a researcher, and Frances A. Champagne, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department of Psychology at Columbia University, New York, New York.
Footnotes
Abbreviations that appear ≥3x throughout this article: Avp, vasopressin; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrohpic factor; CRF, corticotrophin-releasing factor; ER#57441;, estrogen receptor alpha; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; LG, licking and grooming; mRNA, messenger RNA; Nr3c1, glucocorticoid receptor gene; PVN, paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus.
References
- Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK. 2005. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science 308:1466–1469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Avishai-Eliner S, Gilles EE, Eghbal-Ahmadi M, Bar-El Y, Baram TZ. 2001. Altered regulation of gene and protein expression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis components in an immature rat model of chronic stress. J Neuroendocrinol 13:799–807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barbazanges A, Piazza PV, Le Moal M, Maccari S. 1996. Maternal glucocorticoid secretion mediates long-term effects of prenatal stress. J Neurosci 16:3943–3949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blanchard DC, Sakai RR, McEwen B, Weiss SM, Blanchard RJ. 1993. Subordination stress: Behavioral, brain, and neuroendocrine correlates. Behav Brain Res 58:113–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Branchi I, D’Andrea I, Fiore M, Di Fausto V, Aloe L, Alleva E. 2006. Early social enrichment shapes social behavior and nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in the adult mouse brain. Biol Psychiatry 60:690–696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Branchi I, D’Andrea I, Gracci F, Santucci D, Alleva E. 2009. Birth spacing in the mouse communal nest shapes adult emotional and social behavior. Physiol Behav 96:532–539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Branchi I, D’Andrea I, Sietzema J, Fiore M, Di Fausto V, Aloe L, Alleva E. 2006. Early social enrichment augments adult hippocampal BDNF levels and survival of BrdU-positive cells while increasing anxiety- and “depression”-like behavior. J Neurosci Res 83:965–973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Branchi I, Karpova NN, D’Andrea I, Castren E, Alleva E. 2011. Epigenetic modifications induced by early enrichment are associated with changes in timing of induction of BDNF expression. Neurosci Lett 495:168–172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brunson KL, Kramár E, Lin B, Chen Y, Colgin LL, Yanagihara TK, Lynch G, Baram TZ. 2005. Mechanisms of late-onset cognitive decline after early-life stress. J Neurosci 25:9328–9338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caldji C, Diorio J, Meaney MJ. 2000. Variations in maternal care in infancy regulate the development of stress reactivity. Biol Psychiatry 48:1164–1174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caldji C, Francis D, Sharma S, Plotsky PM, Meaney MJ. 2000. The effects of early rearing environment on the development of GABAA and central benzodiazepine receptor levels and novelty-induced fearfulness in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 22:219–229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caldji C, Tannenbaum B, Sharma S, Francis D, Plotsky PM, Meaney MJ. 1998. Maternal care during infancy regulates the development of neural systems mediating the expression of fearfulness in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:5335–5340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cameron N, Del Corpo A, Diorio J, McAllister K, Sharma S, Meaney MJ. 2008. Maternal programming of sexual behavior and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal function in the female rat. PLoS ONE 3:e2210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cameron NM, Fish EW, Meaney MJ. 2008. Maternal influences on the sexual behavior and reproductive success of the female rat. Horm Behav 54:178–184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champagne F, Diorio J, Sharma S, Meaney MJ. 2001. Naturally occurring variations in maternal behavior in the rat are associated with differences in estrogen-inducible central oxytocin receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:12736–12741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champagne FA. 2008. Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Front Neuroendocrinol 29:386–397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champagne FA. 2010. Epigenetic influence of social experiences across the lifespan. Dev Psychobiol 52:299–311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champagne FA, Francis DD, Mar A, Meaney MJ. 2003. Variations in maternal care in the rat as a mediating influence for the effects of environment on development. Physiol Behav 79:359–371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champagne FA, Meaney MJ. 2006. Stress during gestation alters postpartum maternal care and the development of the offspring in a rodent model. Biol Psychiatry 59:1227–1235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champagne FA, Meaney MJ. 2007. Transgenerational effects of social environment on variations in maternal care and behavioral response to novelty. Behav Neurosci 121:1353–1363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champagne FA, Weaver IC, Diorio J, Dymov S, Szyf M, Meaney MJ. 2006. Maternal care associated with methylation of the estrogen receptor-alpha1b promoter and estrogen receptor-alpha expression in the medial preoptic area of female offspring. Endocrinology 147:2909–2915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champagne FA, Weaver IC, Diorio J, Sharma S, Meaney MJ. 2003. Natural variations in maternal care are associated with estrogen receptor alpha expression and estrogen sensitivity in the medial preoptic area. Endocrinology 144:4720–4724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coplan JD, Smith EL, Altemus M, Mathew SJ, Perera T, Kral JG, Gorman JM, Owens MJ, Nemeroff CB, Rosenblum LA. 2006. Maternal–infant response to variable foraging demand in nonhuman primates: Effects of timing of stressor on cerebrospinal fluid corticotropin-releasing factor and circulating glucocorticoid concentrations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1071:525–533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coutellier L, Friedrich AC, Failing K, Marashi V, Wurbel H. 2009. Effects of foraging demand on maternal behaviour and adult offspring anxiety and stress response in C57BL/6 mice. Behav Brain Res 196:192–199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Covington HE 3rd, Maze I, LaPlant QC, Vialou VF, Ohnishi YN, Berton O, Fass DM, Renthal W, Rush AJ 3rd, Wu EY, Ghose S, Krishnan V, Russo SJ, Tamminga C, Haggarty SJ, Nestler EJ. 2009. Antidepressant actions of histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Neurosci 29:11451–11460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D, Dudek BC. 1999. Genetics of mouse behavior: Interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284:1670–1672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crowcroft P, Rowe FP. 1963. Social organization and territorial behavior in the wild house mice (Mus musculus L.). Proc Zool Soc London 140:517–531 [Google Scholar]
- Curley JP, Davidson S, Bateson P, Champagne FA. 2009. Social enrichment during postnatal development induces transgenerational effects on emotional and reproductive behavior in mice. Front Behav Neurosci 3:25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curley JP, Jensen CL, Mashoodh R, Champagne FA. 2011. Social influences on neurobiology and behavior: Epigenetic effects during development. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36:352–371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Catanzaro D. 1988. Effect of predator exposure upon early pregnancy in mice. Physiol Behav 43:691–696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elliott E, Ezra-Nevo G, Regev L, Neufeld-Cohen A, Chen A. 2010. Resilience to social stress coincides with functional DNA methylation of the Crf gene in adult mice. Nat Neurosci 13:1351–1353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Euker JS, Riegle GD. 1973. Effects of stress on pregnancy in the rat. J Reprod Fertil 34:343–346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fairbanks LA. 1989. Early experience and cross-generational continuity of mother-infant contact in vervet monkeys. Dev Psychobiol 22:669–681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer A, Sananbenesi F, Wang X, Dobbin M, Tsai LH. 2007. Recovery of learning and memory is associated with chromatin remodelling. Nature 447:178–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franklin TB, Russig H, Weiss IC, Graff J, Linder N, Michalon A, Vizi S, Mansuy IM. 2010. Epigenetic transmission of the impact of early stress across generations. Biol Psychiatry 68:408–415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilles EE, Schultz L, Baram TZ. 1996. Abnormal corticosterone regulation in an immature rat model of continuous chronic stress. Pediatric Neurology 15:114–119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez A, Lovic V, Ward GR, Wainwright PE, Fleming AS. 2001. Intergenerational effects of complete maternal deprivation and replacement stimulation on maternal behavior and emotionality in female rats. Dev Psychobiol 38:11–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo A, Nappi RE, Criscuolo M, Ficarra G, Amram A, Trentini GP, Petraglia F, Genazzani AR. 1993. Effect of chronic intermittent stress on rat pregnancy and postnatal development. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 51:41–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hane AA, Fox NA. 2006. Ordinary variations in maternal caregiving influence human infants’ stress reactivity. Psychol Sci 17:550–556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harlow HF, Dodsworth RO, Harlow MK. 1965. Total social isolation in monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 54:90–97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heritch AJ, Henderson K, Westfall TC. 1990. Effects of social isolation on brain catecholamines and forced swimming in rats: Prevention by antidepressant treatment. J Psychiatr Res 24:251–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrenkohl LR. 1986. Prenatal stress disrupts reproductive behavior and physiology in offspring. Ann N Y Acad Sci 474:120–128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hollis F, Wang H, Dietz D, Gunjan A, Kabbaj M. 2010. The effects of repeated social defeat on long-term depressive-like behavior and short-term histone modifications in the hippocampus in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 211:69–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ivy AS, Brunson KL, Sandman C, Baram TZ. 2008. Dysfunctional nurturing behavior in rat dams with limited access to nesting material: A clinically relevant model for early-life stress. Neuroscience 154:1132–1142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaiser S, Sachser N. 1998. The social environment during pregnancy and lactation affects the female offsprings’ endocrine status and behaviour in guinea pigs. Physiol Behav 63:361–366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keeney AJ, Hogg S. 1999. Behavioural consequences of repeated social defeat in the mouse: Preliminary evaluation of a potential animal model of depression. Behav Pharmacol 10:753–764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krebs CJ, Boutin S, Boonstra R, Sinclair AR, Smith JN, Dale MR, Martin K, Turkington R. 1995. Impact of food and predation on the snowshoe hare cycle. Science 269:1112–1115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuzumaki N, Ikegami D, Tamura R, Hareyama N, Imai S, Narita M, Torigoe K, Niikura K, Takeshima H, Ando T, Igarashi K, Kanno J, Ushijima T, Suzuki T. 2011. Hippocampal epigenetic modification at the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene induced by an enriched environment. Hippocampus 21:127–132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ladd CO, Huot RL, Thrivikraman KV, Nemeroff CB, Plotsky PM. 2004. Long-term adaptations in glucocorticoid receptor and mineralocorticoid receptor mRNA and negative feedback on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis following neonatal maternal separation. Biol Psychiatry 55:367–375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LaPlant Q, Vialou V, Covington HE 3rd, Dumitriu D, Feng J, Warren BL, Maze I, Dietz DM, Watts EL, Iniguez SD, Koo JW, Mouzon E, Renthal W, Hollis F, Wang H, Noonan MA, Ren Y, Eisch AJ, Bolanos CA, Kabbaj M, Xiao G, Neve RL, Hurd YL, Oosting RS, Fan G, Morrison JH, Nestler EJ. 2010. Dnmt3a regulates emotional behavior and spine plasticity in the nucleus accumbens. Nat Neurosci 13:1137–1143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehmann J, Feldon J. 2000. Long-term biobehavioral effects of maternal separation in the rat: Consistent or confusing? Rev Neurosci 11:383–408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehmann J, Pryce CR, Jongen-Relo AL, Stohr T, Pothuizen HH, Feldon J. 2002. Comparison of maternal separation and early handling in terms of their neurobehavioral effects in aged rats. Neurobiol Aging 23:457–466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lippmann M, Bress A, Nemeroff CB, Plotsky PM, Monteggia LM. 2007. Long-term behavioural and molecular alterations associated with maternal separation in rats. Eur J Neurosci 25:3091–3098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu D, Diorio J, Day JC, Francis DD, Meaney MJ. 2000. Maternal care, hippocampal synaptogenesis and cognitive development in rats. Nat Neurosci 3:799–806 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu D, Diorio J, Tannenbaum B, Caldji C, Francis D, Freedman A, Sharma S, Pearson D, Plotsky PM, Meaney MJ. 1997. Maternal care, hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress. Science 277:1659–1662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maccari S, Darnaudery M, Morley-Fletcher S, Zuena AR, Cinque C, Van Reeth O. 2003. Prenatal stress and long-term consequences: Implications of glucocorticoid hormones. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:119–127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez M, Calvo-Torrent A, Herbert J. 2002. Mapping brain response to social stress in rodents with c-fos expression: A review. Stress 5:3–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matthews SG. 2002. Early programming of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Trends Endocrinol Metab 13:373–380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGowan PO, Sasaki A, D’Alessio AC, Dymov S, Labonte B, Szyf M, Turecki G, Meaney MJ. 2009. Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nat Neurosci 12:342–348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meaney MJ. 2001. Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:1161–1192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meerlo P, Overkamp GJ, Benning MA, Koolhaas JM, Van den Hoofdakker RH. 1996. Long-term changes in open field behaviour following a single social defeat in rats can be reversed by sleep deprivation. Physiol Behav 60:115–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miczek KA. 1979. A new test for aggression in rats without aversive stimulation: Differential effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 60:253–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller CA, Sweatt JD. 2007. Covalent modification of DNA regulates memory formation. Neuron 53:857–869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molina VA, Volosin M, Cancela L, Keller E, Murua VS, Basso AM. 1990. Effect of chronic variable stress on monoamine receptors: Influence of imipramine administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 35:335–340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan D, Grant KA, Gage HD, Mach RH, Kaplan JR, Prioleau O, Nader SH, Buchheimer N, Ehrenkaufer RL, Nader MA. 2002. Social dominance in monkeys: Dopamine D2 receptors and cocaine self-administration. Nat Neurosci 5:169–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mueller BR, Bale TL. 2006. Impact of prenatal stress on long term body weight is dependent on timing and maternal sensitivity. Physiol Behav 88:605–614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mueller BR, Bale TL. 2008. Sex-specific programming of offspring emotionality after stress early in pregnancy. J Neurosci 28:9055–9065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murgatroyd C, Patchev AV, Wu Y, Micale V, Bockmuhl Y, Fischer D, Holsboer F, Wotjak CT, Almeida OF, Spengler D. 2009. Dynamic DNA methylation programs persistent adverse effects of early-life stress. Nat Neurosci 12:1559–1566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nithianantharajah J, Hannan AJ. 2006. Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:697–709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oberlander TF, Weinberg J, Papsdorf M, Grunau R, Misri S, Devlin AM. 2008. Prenatal exposure to maternal depression, neonatal methylation of human glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) and infant cortisol stress responses. Epigenetics 3:97–106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson CL, Laniel MA. 2004. Histones and histone modifications. Curr Biol 14:R546–551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raab A, Dantzer R, Michaud B, Mormede P, Taghzouti K, Simon H, Le Moal M. 1986. Behavioural, physiological and immunological consequences of social status and aggression in chronically coexisting resident-intruder dyads of male rats. Physiol Behav 36:223–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radtke KM, Ruf M, Gunter HM, Dohrmann K, Schauer M, Elbert T. 2011. Transgenerational impact of intimate partner violence on methylation in the promoter of the glucocorticoid receptor. Transl Psychiatry 1:e21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raineki C, Moriceau S, Sullivan RM. 2010. Developing a neurobehavioral animal model of infant attachment to an abusive caregiver. Biol Psychiatry 67:1137–1145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Razin A. 1998. CpG methylation, chromatin structure and gene silencing-a three-way connection. Embo J 17:4905–4908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Renthal W, Maze I, Krishnan V, Covington HE 3rd, Xiao G, Kumar A, Russo SJ, Graham A, Tsankova N, Kippin TE, Kerstetter KA, Neve RL, Haggarty SJ, McKinsey TA, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN, Nestler EJ. 2007. Histone deacetylase 5 epigenetically controls behavioral adaptations to chronic emotional stimuli. Neuron 56:517–529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenfeld P, Wetmore JB, Levine S. 1992. Effects of repeated maternal separations on the adrenocortical response to stress of preweanling rats. Physiol Behav 52:787–791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roth TL, Lubin FD, Funk AJ, Sweatt JD. 2009. Lasting epigenetic influence of early-life adversity on the BDNF gene. Biol Psychiatry 65:760–769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roth TL, Zoladz PR, Sweatt JD, Diamond DM. 2011. Epigenetic modification of hippocampal Bdnf DNA in adult rats in an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatr Res 45:919–926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rygula R, Abumaria N, Havemann-Reinecke U, Ruther E, Hiemke C, Zernig G, Fuchs E, Flugge G. 2008. Pharmacological validation of a chronic social stress model of depression in rats: Effects of reboxetine, haloperidol and diazepam. Behav Pharmacol 19:183–196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sapolsky RM, Meaney MJ, McEwen BS. 1985. The development of the glucocorticoid receptor system in the rat limbic brain. III. Negative-feedback regulation. Brain Res 350:169–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheriff MJ, Krebs CJ, Boonstra R. 2010. The ghosts of predators past: Population cycles and the role of maternal programming under fluctuating predation risk. Ecology 91:2983–2994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stratakis CA, Chrousos GP. 1995. Neuroendocrinology and pathophysiology of the stress system. Ann N Y Acad Sci 771:1–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suomi SJ, Collins ML, Harlow HF, Ruppenthal GC. 1976. Effects of maternal and peer separations on young monkeys. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 17:101–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamashiro KL, Nguyen MM, Sakai RR. 2005. Social stress: From rodents to primates. Front Neuroendocrinol 26:27–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomalski P, Johnson MH. 2010. The effects of early adversity on the adult and developing brain. Curr Opin Psychiatry 23:233–238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsankova NM, Berton O, Renthal W, Kumar A, Neve RL, Nestler EJ. 2006. Sustained hippocampal chromatin regulation in a mouse model of depression and antidepressant action. Nat Neurosci 9:519–525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turek-Plewa J, Jagodzinski PP. 2005. The role of mammalian DNA methyltransferases in the regulation of gene expression. Cell Mol Biol Lett 10:631–647 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner B. 2001. Chromatin and Gene Regulation. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd [Google Scholar]
- Uchida S, Hara K, Kobayashi A, Otsuki K, Yamagata H, Hobara T, Suzuki T, Miyata N, Watanabe Y. 2011. Epigenetic status of Gdnf in the ventral striatum determines susceptibility and adaptation to daily stressful events. Neuron 69:359–372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wahlsten D, Metten P, Phillips TJ, Boehm SL, Jr, Burkhart-Kasch S, Dorow J, Doerksen S, Downing C, Fogarty J, Rodd-Henricks K, Hen R, McKinnon CS, Merrill CM, Nolte C, Schalomon M, Schlumbohm JP, Sibert JR, Wenger CD, Dudek BC, Crabbe JC. 2003. Different data from different labs: Lessons from studies of gene-environment interaction. J Neurobiol 54:283–311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weaver IC, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D’Alessio AC, Sharma S, Seckl JR, Dymov S, Szyf M, Meaney MJ. 2004. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci 7:847–854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weaver JR, Susiarjo M, Bartolomei MS. 2009. Imprinting and epigenetic changes in the early embryo. Mamm Genome 20:532–543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weinstock M. 2008. The long-term behavioural consequences of prenatal stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:1073–1086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weinstock M, Fride E, Hertzberg R. 1988. Prenatal stress effects on functional development of the offspring. Prog Brain Res 73:319–331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Welberg LA, Seckl JR, Holmes MC. 2001. Prenatal glucocorticoid programming of brain corticosteroid receptors and corticotrophin-releasing hormone: Possible implications for behaviour. Neuroscience 104:71–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- West JR. 1993. Use of pup in a cup model to study brain development. J Nutr 123:382–385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang TY, Hellstrom IC, Bagot RC, Wen X, Diorio J, Meaney MJ. 2010. Maternal care and DNA methylation of a glutamic acid decarboxylase 1 promoter in rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 30:13130–13137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

