Skip to main content
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2014 Apr 28;2014:648472. doi: 10.1155/2014/648472

Erratum to “Montreal Cognitive Assessment Is Superior to Standardized Mini-Mental Status Exam in Detecting Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus”

Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan 1,*, Nancy Zhao 1, Laurie Mereu 1, Peter A Senior 1, Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan 2
PMCID: PMC4022247

There are some errors on page 2 with the cut-off score for MCI based on MoCA score.

Under Methodology, in the last paragraph—5th line, there is an error, “A MoCA score of 26 or less is considered as MCI” which should read as “A MoCA score of less than 26 (25 or less) is considered as MCI.” Under Statistical Analysis—line 9, there is another error, scores “≤26” which should be “<26,” and, in Tables  3 and 4, the error is “total score (≤26)” which should be “(<26).”

Table 3.

Abnormal scores on different domains of MoCA in both middle-aged (50–64 years) and elderly (≥65 years) patients with and without MCI by the European consortium criteria.

Abnormal score on domains European consortium criteria P value
MCI present (n = 15) MCI absent (n = 15)
Total score (<26) 7 (46.7%) 1 (6.7%) 0.04
Visuo spatial 8 (53.3%) 6 (40%) 0.46
Language 8 (53.3%) 4 (26.7%) 0.14
Attention and calculation 6 (40%) 2 (13.3%) 0.22*
Abstraction 6 (40%) 3 (20%) 0.43*
Memory 13 (86.7%) 10 (66.1%) 0.39*
Orientation 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Clock drawing 6 (40%) 2 (13.3%) 0.22

With discrete variable, the differences in the proportions were tested by chi-square tests except that *Fisher's exact test was used to test the differences in the attention and calculation, abstraction, and memory.

Table 4.

Abnormal scores on different domains of MoCA in the middle-aged (50–64 years) patients with and without MCI by the European consortium criteria.

Abnormal score on MoCA European consortium criteria P value*
MCI present (n = 11) MCI absent (n = 11)
Total score (<26) 4 (36.4%) 1 (9.1%) 0.31
Visuo spatial 4 (36.4%) 3 (27.3%) 1.00
Language 5 (45.5%) 6 (54.6%) 1.00
Attention and calculation 4 (36.4%) 1 (9.1%) 0.31
Abstraction 6 (54.6%) 3 (27.3%) 0.39
Memory 10 (90.9%) 7 (63.6%) 0.31
Orientation 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Clock drawing 3 (27.2%) 2 (18.2%) 1.0

 *The differences in the proportions were tested by Fisher's exact test.


Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES