Abstract
Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (CEOT) is a solid, locally aggressive, benign odontogenic neoplasm characterized by sheets and nests of polyhedral epithelial cells exhibiting eosinophilic and less often clear cytoplasm, occasional nuclear pleomorphism without mitotic activity, calcifications, and deposits of amyloid. A cystic variant has been reported only twice. Herein, we present an additional example of cystic CEOT occurring in a 31-year-old male and featuring clear cell epithelial lining with deposits of amyloid and osteodentin.
Keywords: Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor, Pindborg tumor, Clear cell, Cystic, Amyloid, Osteodentin
Introduction
Initially described by Pindborg in 1955, calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (CEOT) is a rare benign odontogenic neoplasm, usually painless and slow growing, but occasionally locally aggressive. Rare peripheral and malignant cases of CEOT have been reported [1–10]. CEOT probably originates from either the reduced enamel epithelium [11, 12], stratum intermedium or the cells of the dental lamina [13]. Radiographically, it presents as a unilocular or multilocular radiolucency with occasional opacities that gradually increase in size. Histologically, it features polyhedral epithelial cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm arranged in sheets and islands and invested in a fibrous connective tissue stroma. Nuclear atypia, however without mitotic activity, is appreciated. Other characteristics include the presence of extracellular eosinophilic material that stains positive for amyloid, as well as dystrophic calcifications [14–17]. Clear cell and cystic variants have also been described [4–6, 18–27]. Herein, we present an additional example of the cystic variant, characterized by a clear cell lining.
Case Report
A 31-year-old male presented with a rapidly growing, asymptomatic left posterior mandibular mass of 2 months duration. Extraoral examination revealed facial asymmetry with diffuse unilateral swelling in the middle and lower third of the face. Intraorally, the overlying mucosa was ulcerated. An ortho pantomogram featured a mixed radiopaque/lucent lesion extending from the distal root of the lower left first molar to the ascending ramus, eroding the cortex, and resorbing the roots of the second and third molars (Fig. 1a). A subsequent CT further characterized the lesion as a mixed lucent/opaque expansile lesion measuring approximately 3.0 × 3.0 × 2.0 cm, that focally eroded the buccal and lingual cortical plates (Fig. 1b). The lesion was excised. Macroscopically, the specimen was composed of two, irregular in shape, brown and white, fragments, measuring 3.0 × 1.4 × 1.4 cm in aggregate (Fig. 2). One of them was cystic and the other was composed of calcified material. The latter apparently derived from the lumen of the cyst.
Fig. 1.
a Orthopantomogram. Unilocular mixed radiopaque/lucent, expansile and locally aggressive lesion, located in the left posterior mandible and ascending ramus; b CT. Osteolytic lesion is seen with expansion of surrounding tissue and a central area isodense to bone
Fig. 2.

Gross features. Portion 1 features cystic cavity with projections into the lumen. Portion 2 features calcified spherical and irregular mass
Microscopically, the cystic portion of the lesion featured odontogenic epithelial lining characterized by cells with optically clear cytoplasm and centrally located round nucleus (Fig. 3a, b). Necrosis was observed in the superficial aspect of the lining. PAS histochemical stain revealed positive, diastase resistant intracellular granules and extracellular material (Fig. 3c). Eosinophilic hyalinized material, positive for Congo red and exhibiting apple-green birefringence after polarization was also appreciated (Fig. 3d). The calcified mass had the characteristics of osteodentin (Fig. 3e). Mixed with the calcified material there were clear cells that featured, occasionally, round eosinophilic globules consistent with “thanatosomes” (Fig. 3f). The diagnosis of clear cell cystic variant of CEOT was rendered. The patient was lost to follow-up.
Fig. 3.
a Cystic cavity (CC) lined by odontogenic epithelium of generally uniform thickness, with focal necrosis (arrow) (H&E ×40); b Clear cells in the cystic lining revealing intracellular and eosinophilic extracellular material (H&E ×400); c Positive diastase resistant deposits (PAS. diastase stain ×400); d Amorphous, eosinophilic hyalinized material exhibiting apple-green birefringence after polarization (Congo red stain ×100); e Calcified material with characteristics of osteodentin (H&E ×100); f Round eosinophilic globules consistent with “thanatosomes” (arrows) (H&E ×400) and f’ “thanatosome” in detail (asterisk) (H&E ×1,000)
Discussion
Up to now, there are only two examples of cystic CEOT [26, 27]. Table 1 summarizes the clinicopathologic features of the reported cases including the present case. Clinically, the present case is different from the other two in that, first, it was not associated with an impacted tooth and, second, it occurred in the mandible. Histogenetically, the cystic variant of CEOT in the two cases associated with impacted teeth most likely derived from reduced enamel epithelium or the lining of a cyst. The reduced enamel epithelium has been generally considered as the origin for conventional CEOT and it is well known that fifty percent of CEOTs are associated with impacted teeth [14, 15, 26]. It is also known that CEOT-like proliferations, regarded hamartomatous in nature [28], may be, infrequently, seen focally in the reduced enamel epithelial lining of otherwise pathologically unremarkable dental follicles. Interestingly, these proliferations can feature small amyloid deposits. Reduced enamel epithelium, as part of post maturation ameloblasts, has the ability to express odontogenic ameloblast-associated protein (ODAM) that is present in CEOT-amyloid [29–31]. Thus it is plausible that these proliferations may be the very early stage of CEOT.
Table 1.
Clinicopathological features of reported cases of cystic variants of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (CEOT)
| Case | Sex | Age (years) | Location | Radiographic findings | Histopathological findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gopalakrishnan et al. [26] | Male | 15 | Left maxilla | Unilocular radiolucency with radiopacities in association with impacted tooth #15 | Cystic lining varying from focally thin, nonkeratinizing, stratified squamous epithelium to thickened epithelium with characteristics of CEOT. |
| Channappa et al. [27] | Male | 30 | Left maxilla | Unilocular radiolucency with calcifications in association with impacted tooth #13 | Cyst lined by odontogenic epithelium showing a tendency towards stratification, majority with uniform thickness, with classic features of CEOT |
| Present case | Male | 31 | Left mandible | Unilocular radiopaque/lucent area, eroding the cortex and rhizolysis of teeth #17 y 18, without presence of impacted tooth | Cystic lining showed odontogenic epithelium with necrotic areas, featuring clear cells that revealed PAS positive diastase resistant deposits; and presence of osteodentin |
Our case was highlighted by the presence of a clear cell epithelial lining with deposits of amyloid and the presence of osteodentin. It has been shown histochemically and ultrastructurally, that the clear cells contain PAS-positive diastase labile material consistent with glycogen [4, 5, 21, 24, 32]; however, glycogen deposition has been also ruled out [22]. The clearing is either the result of degeneration [18] or cytodifferentiation [32]. In our example, PAS diastase resistance was noted suggesting degenerative changes, since in some of the clear cells we observed cytoplasmic eosinophilic globules suggestive of thanatosomes that are reportedly diastase resistant [33, 34]. Furthermore, necrotic areas and degeneration of the epithelial lining was observed in the superficial aspect of the lining. Therefore, we consider that the cystic pattern observed in the tumor of our patient is the result of cystic degeneration of a solid CEOT. Conversely, Gopalakrishnan et al. [26] and Channappa et al. [27] agreed that cystic CEOT might represent neoplastic transformation of dental follicular lining epithelium. Gopalakrishnan et al. [26] further argued that cystic CEOT could have developed from neoplastic transformation of the epithelial lining of a dentigerous cyst, since they observed in their example a cystic lining indistinguishable from that of a dentigerous cyst.
The presence of osteodentin in association with CEOT has not been described; nevertheless, osteodentin has been reported in other odontogenic tumors deriving only from odontogenic epithelium [35–37]. It is likely the result of a metaplastic process, as odontogenic ectomesenchyme is not present, and thus should not be interpreted as an induction phenomenon [38].
Differential diagnosis between clear cell variant of CEOT and other tumors showing clear cell differentiation in the jaws, such as metastatic tumors from kidney, thyroid, liver, colon, and prostate, clear cell odontogenic carcinoma and central mucoepidermoid carcinoma [4, 20, 21] is generally necessary; however, due to the histological characteristics found in our case, highlighted by the presence of amyloid, and the occurrence of osteodentin, the other tumors were excluded.
The adequacy of simple enucleation as management in patients with cystic CEOT has been suggested. Currently, conservative enucleation has been the treatment choice also for conventional CEOT [26, 27] with no recurrence reported on follow-up.
In summary, we reported a rare example of a cystic CEOT with presence of clear cells in the lining, and presence of calcified material resembling osteodentin.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Urias was supported by the Young Doctors Program of the Autonomous University of Sinaloa. She was also Fellow in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota.
References
- 1.Pindborg JJ, Simonsen EK, Hansen PB. A case of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor. Tandlaegebladet. 1966;70:822–830. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wertheimer FW, Zielinski RJ, Wesley RK. Extraosseous calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (Pindborg tumor) Int J Oral Surg. 1977;6:266–269. doi: 10.1016/S0300-9785(77)80037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Houston GD, Fowler CB. Extraosseous calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor: report of two cases and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:577–583. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90123-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Orsini G, Favia G, Piatelli A. Peripheral clear cell calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor. Report of a case. J Periodontol. 2000;71:1177–1180. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.7.1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mesquita RA, Lotufo MA, Sugaya NN, De Araújo NS, De Araújo VC. Peripheral clear cell variant of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor: report of a case and immunohistochemical investigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95:198–204. doi: 10.1067/moe.2003.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Habibi A, Saghravanian N, Zare R, Jafarzadh H. Clear cell variant of extraosseous calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor: a case report. J Oral Sci. 2009;51:485–488. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.51.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Basu MK, Matthews JB, Sear AJ, Browne RM. Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumour: a case showing features of malignancy. J Oral Pathol. 1984;13:310–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1984.tb01429.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Veness MJ, Morgan G, Collins AP, Walker DM. Calcifying epithelial odontogenic (Pindborg) tumor with malignant transformation and metastatic spread. Head Neck. 2001;23:692–696. doi: 10.1002/hed.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cheng YS, Wright JM, Walstad WR, Finn MD. Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor showing microscopic features of potential malignant behavior. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:287–295. doi: 10.1067/moe.2002.121991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kawano K, Ono K, Yada N, et al. Malignant calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor of the mandible: report of a case with pulmonary metastasis showing remarkable response to platinum derivatives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chaudhry AP, Holte NO, Vickers RA. Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor. Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1962;15:843–848. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(62)90336-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gon F. The calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumour: report of a case and a study of its histogenesis. Br J Cancer. 1965;19:39–50. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1965.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shanmuga PS, Ravikumar A, Krishnarathnam K, Rajendiran S. Intraosseous calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor in a case with multiple myeloma. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2009;13:10–13. doi: 10.4103/0973-029X.48742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Franklin CD, Pindborg JJ. The calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor: a review and analysis of 113 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976;42:753–765. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(76)90098-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Philipsen HP, Reichart PA. Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumour: biological profile based on 181 cases from the literature. Oral Oncol. 2000;36:17–26. doi: 10.1016/S1368-8375(99)00061-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goode RK. Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2004;16:323–331. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2004.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin J, Bianchi M, Popnikolov NK, Abaza NA. Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor: case report with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2013;71:278–289. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.06.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Anderson HC, Byunghoon K, Minkowitz S. Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor of Pindborg. An electron microscopic study. Cancer. 1969;24:585–596. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196909)24:3<585::AID-CNCR2820240325>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Greer RO, Jr, Richardson JF. Clear-cell calcifying odontogenic tumor viewed relative to the Pindborg tumor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976;42:775–779. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(76)90100-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schmidt- Westhausen A, Philipsen HP, Reichart PA. Clear cell calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;21:47–49. doi: 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80453-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kumamoto H, Sato I, Tateno H, et al. Clear cell variant of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (CEOT) in the maxilla: report of a case with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural investigations. J Oral Pathol Med. 1999;28:187–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1999.tb02022.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Anavi Y, Kaplan I, Citir M, et al. Clear-cell variant of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor: clinical and radiographic characteristics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95:332–339. doi: 10.1067/moe.2003.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Germanier Y, Bornstein MM, Stauffer E, et al. Calcifying epithelial odontogenic (pindborg) tumor of the mandible with clear cell component treated by conservative surgery: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1377–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rangel A, Silva A, Ito F, et al. Clear cell variant of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor: is it locally aggressive? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:207–211. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sahni P, Nayak MT, Singhvi A, et al. Clear cell calcifying epithelial odontogenic (Pindborg) tumor involving the maxillary sinus: a case report and review of literature. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2012;16:454–459. doi: 10.4103/0973-029X.102520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gopalakrishnan R, Simonton S, Rohrer M, et al. Cystic variant of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:773–777. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Channappa NK, Krishnapillai R, Rao JB. Cystic variant of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor. J Investig Clin Dent. 2012;3:152–156. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2011.00092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ide F, Obara K, Yamada H, et al. Hamartomatous proliferations of odontogenic epithelium within the jaws: a potential histogenetic source of intraosseous epithelial odontogenic tumors. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;36:229–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00488.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kestler DP, Foster JS, Macy SD, et al. Expression of odontogenic ameloblast-associated protein (ODAM) in dental and other epithelial neoplasms. Mol Med. 2008;14:318–326. doi: 10.2119/2008-00010.Kestler. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Eversole LR. Odontogenic fibroma, including amyloid and ossifying variants. Head Neck Pathol. 2011;5:335–343. doi: 10.1007/s12105-011-0279-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Crivelini MM, Felipini RC, Miyahara GI, et al. Expression of odontogenic ameloblast-associated protein, amelotin, ameloblastin, and amelogenin in odontogenic tumors: immonohistochemical analysis and pathogenetic considerations. J Oral Pathol Med. 2012;41:272–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2011.01079.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yamaguchi A, Kokubu JM, Takagi M, et al. Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor: histochemical and electron microscopic observations on a case. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1980;27:129–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Papadimitriou JC, Drachenberg CB, Brenner DS, et al. “Thanatosomes”: a unifying morphogenetic concept for tumor hyaline globules related to apoptosis. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:1455–1465. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2000.20376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lee H, Meier FA, Ma CK, et al. Eosinophilic globules in 3 cases of glomeruloid hemangioma of the head and neck: a characteristic offering more evidence for thanatosomes with or without POEMS. Am J Dermatopathol. 2008;30:539–544. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0b013e318182c800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Takeda Y. Induction of osteodentin and abortive enamel in adenomatoid odontogenic tumor. Ann Dent. 1995;54:61–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.de Matos FR, Nonaka CF, Pinto LP, et al. Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor: retrospective study of 15 cases with emphasis on histopahologic features. Head Neck Pathol. 2012;6:430–437. doi: 10.1007/s12105-012-0388-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nqwenya SP, Raubenheimer EJ, Noffke CE. Internal morphology of ameloblastomas: a study of 24 resected specimens. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:754–762. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Philipsen HP, Reichart PA, Slootweg PJ, Slater LJ. Odontogenic tumors. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, editors. World health organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumors. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2005. pp. 283–327. [Google Scholar]


