Skip to main content
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica logoLink to Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
. 2014 Apr;34(2):123–128.

Vestibular assessment in patients with vestibular schwannomas: what really matters?

Valutazione della funzione vestibolare nei pazienti affetti da Schwannomi vestibolari: cosa conta realmente?

R TEGGI 1,, A FRANZIN 2, G SPATOLA 2, N BOARI 2, P PICOZZI 2, M BAILO 2, LO PICCIONI 1, F GAGLIARDI 2, P MORTINI 2, M BUSSI 1
PMCID: PMC4025177  PMID: 24843223

SUMMARY

Vestibular function is often underdiagnosed in vestibular schwannomas (VS). To evaluate it in a selected group of patients harbouring vestibular schwannomas, 64 patients were included in this study, recruited between March 2008 and June 2011 at our institution. All patients underwent Gd-enhanced MRI and complete neurotological evaluation before gamma knife surgery. Morphological measurements included Koos Classification and quantification of internal acoustic canal filling in length and diameter. Cochlear and vestibular functions were assessed considering pure tone and speech audiometry, bedside examination and caloric test by videonystagmography. A statistical analysis was performed to find possible correlations between morphological and cochleovestibular data. Patients with a higher intracanalicular length (ICL, mean value 8.59 and median 8.8 mm) of the tumour presented a higher value of UW than the subgroup with a lower length (51.9 ± 24.3% and 38.8 ± 18.1% respectively, p = 0.04), while no difference was detected for pure tone audiometry (PTA) values (50.9 ± 22.3 db and 51.1 ± 28.9 db respectively). Patients with a higher ICL also presented a higher rate of positive HIT (88% and 60% respectively, p = 0.006). Patients with a higher value of intracanalicular diameter (ICD, mean value 5.22 and median 5.15 mm) demonstrated higher values of UW (50.2 ± 29.1% and 39.3 ± 21% respectively, p = 0.03), but not different PTA (50.2 ± 29.1 db and 51.9 ± 29.9 db respectively). Finally, patients with a positive head impulse test (HIT) demonstrated significantly higher values of unilateral weakness (UW) (p = 0.001). Vestibular disorders are probably underdiagnosed in patients with VS. ICL and ICD seem to be the main parameters that correlate with vestibular function. Also, in case of small intracanalar T1 VS a slight increase of these variables can result in significant vestibular impairment. The data reported in the present study are not inconsistent with the possibility of proactive treatment of patients with VS.

KEY WORDS: Vestibular Schwannomas, Vestibular tests, Hearing loss, Gamma-Knife, Radiosurgery

Introduction

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are extra-axial, slow-growing benign lesions arising from the vestibular nerve. Usually the VS originates in the distal neurilemmal portion of the nerve at, or close to, the neurilemmal glial junction 1. The median age at diagnosis is 50 years and appears in a sporadic unilateral form in the majority of cases (95%), with an incidence of about 1/100,000 per year, without any sexual prevalence 2 3. When bilateral, it is often linked to a neurofibromatosis type 2, an autosomal dominant tumour-suppressor syndrome characterised by schwannomas, meningiomas and ependymomas that develop throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems 4 5. They represent more than 90% of all cerebellopontine angle lesions. In 25%-45% of cases schwannomas occur in head and neck region 6.

In the last decades, with the widespread availability of MRI, the incidental diagnoses of VS has increased, while the size of newly diagnosed VS has progressively decreased. Despite the anatomical origin, many patients with VS complain of hearing loss 7 8, but only a few experience vestibular symptoms 9. Many studies have demonstrated the correlation between tumour size and functional hearing 10 11, but the correlation between tumour extension and vestibular symptoms has still not been clarified.

In previous studies, tumour size has been demonstrated to have a correlation with caloric responses and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs), and above all with ocular VEMPs 12 13, although in patients with VS within the internal acoustic canal neither the nerve origin of the tumour nor tumour size show clear correlation with the results of these tests 14. In fact, the absence of caloric responses and VEMPs from one side may be predictive of a tumour size > of 2.5 cm 15.

Three options have been proposed for VS:

Surgical treatment may be considered 16 17, although according to some authors intervention may be associated with several complications 18;

A radiosurgical approach may be alternatively taken 19 20; according to the recent guidelines for the treatment of VS approved by the International RadioSurgery Association (IRSA) 21, stereotactic radio-surgical treatment with gamma knife (GKS) is indicated in tumours smaller than 3 cm in diameter without brainstem distortion, post-surgical residual even larger than 3 cm and growing intracanalicular tumours. Recent studies reported a tumour growth control rate after GKS treatment of 93-100% 22 23;

Since most VS have a slow growth rate, management with a "wait and see" policy has been proposed 24 25.

Some authors underline that when surgery is needed after radiosurgery, the risk of facial nerve palsy is increased 26. Audiometric exam, rather than vestibular assessment, is at present mainly considered in therapeutic decision. The present study aims to evaluate vestibular function in a selected group of patients eligible for GKS for VS.

Materials and methods

Patient population

Between March 2008 and June 2011, 240 patients underwent GKS for VS at the Neurosurgical Department of San Raffaele Hospital in Milan. All patients were eligible for GKS according to IRSA Guidelines.

In all cases, Gd-enhanced MRI and complete otolaryngological evaluation before GKS treatment were performed. Exclusion criteria were:

  • no detectable hearing before treatment;

  • type 2 neurofibromatosis;

  • bilateral tumours;

  • Koos T4b stage;

  • previous therapy on the targeted tumour;

  • evidence of chronic otitis media and/or previous surgery of the middle ear;

  • therapies with ototoxic drugs and/or chemotherapy;

  • other lifetime vestibular disorders, with particular attention to Ménière's disease and CNS disorders.

Moreover, patients were asked to avoid consumption of any sedative drugs within the 24 hours before examination. According to these criteria, 64 patients were selected and included in the study: 42 women (66%) and 22 men (34%) with a mean age of 54.5 years (median 55.5 years, range 19-81 years). Thirty-five patients (55%) had right sided VS, and 29 (45%) left sided VS. Demographic data are summarised in Table I.

Table I.

Patient population.

Characteristic # patients (%)
Sex
Male 22 (34)
Female 42 (66)
Side
Right 35 (55)
Left 29 (64)
Koos tumour stage
T1 11 (17)
T2 8 (13)
T3a 15 (23)
T3b 20 (31)
T4a 10 (16)

Evaluation of tumour size

Tumour volume, internal acoustic canal filling (in length and diameter) and Koos classification were assessed on MRI (Magnetom Vision model, Siemens; 1.5 Tesla) performed before GKS. The MRI imaging sequences were gadolinium contrast enhanced axial and coronal T1- weighted (2 mm thickness without gap, TR = 650, TE = 14, matrix 512 x 512 and double acquisition), 3D-CISS (reconstructed to 1.2 mm thickness without gap, TR = 4000, TE = 250, matrix 512 x 512) and axial T2 weighted (2 mm thickness without gap, TR = 3000, TE = 120, matrix 512 x 512).

The tumour volume varied between 0.01 and 9.4 ml (mean 1.34 + 0.22 ml, median 0.73 ml). The mean intracanalicular length (ICL) was 8.59 mm (median 8.8 range 2.8-13.4 mm), and mean intracanalicular diameter (ICD) was 5.22 mm (median 5.2 range 1.1-10.8 mm). According to Koos classification, 11 lesions were stage T1, 8 stage T2, 15 stage T3a, 20 stage T3b and 10 stage T4a; no patients with 4th ventricle obstruction (Koos stage T4b) were included. Morphologic data are summarised in Table II.

Table II.

Morphological data of lesions.

Age y±SD ICL mm±SD ICD mm±SD Volume ml±SD
Koos 1
(n=11)
51 ± 15 8.2 ± 1.9 4.7 ± 1.5 0.12 ± 0.08
Koos 2
(n=8)
47 ± 19 9.4 ± 2.2 5.6 ± 1.2 0.53 ± 0.34
Koos 3A
(n=15)
55 ± 9 7 ± 2.5 4.9 ± 1.6 1.3 ± 1
Koos 3B
(n=20)
55 ± 13 9.6 ± 2.5 5.1 ± 1.8 2.7 ± 2.6
Koos 4
(n=10)
57 ± 16 8.3 ± 2.8 5.6 ± 1.8 4.8 ± 2.9

ICD = intracanalicular diameter, ICL = intracanalicular length, y = years.

Cochlear and vestibular assessment

Cochlear and vestibular assessments were performed by a senior neurotologist and included:

  • Clinical history for the age of onset of cochlear symptoms, presence of previous episodes of rotational vertigo and sensation of unsteadiness or imbalance.

  • Pure tone audiometry for frequencies between 250 Hz and 8000 Hz; the exam was performed in a quiet room with a half octave precision. The pure-tone average (PTA) was calculated as the mean of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz thresholds.

  • Speech audiometry was performed in silence, scoring by phonemes correctly repeated at several suprathreshold intensities. The CD contained phonetically balanced disyllabic lists commonly used for adult clinical testing. Speech discrimination score (SDS) was assessed; SDS was defined as the percentage of words correctly identified.

  • Evaluation of vestibular system function performed by videonystagmography using the VO25 VNG system (Interacoustics, Assens, Denmark); the full vestibular examination included a study of spontaneous nystagmus, post head shaking test (HST), head impulse test (HIT) and hyperventilation tests.

  • Caloric stimulation according to Fitzgerald-Hallpike was performed using an Amplaid otocalorimeter. The authors used angular slow phase velocity (SPV), as calculated during 10 sec of culmination, as the single parameter of labyrinthine function during caloric tests: data were interpreted in terms of unilateral weakness (UW) according to Jongkees' formula.

According to the American Academy of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) guidelines 27, hearing function was defined as class A (PTA < 30 dB and SDS > 70%), class B (PTA > 30 dB and < 50 dB and SDS > 50%), class C (PTA > 50 dB and SDS > 50%) or class D (PTA any level and SDS < 50%). Caloric vestibular function was defined as class A when UW was less than 25%, class B when between 25 and 50%, class C when between 50 and 75%, class D when UW exceeded 75%.

Statistical analysis

Continuously distributed variables were described as mean and standard deviation (SD), while median values and categorical variables were described by frequencies and percentages. The significance of any difference between groups was evaluated by a t-test for independent samples and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures. Nominal data were compared by the chi-square test. The results were considered statistically significant for p values < 0.05.

Results

In this cohort, 18 subjects referred a previous episode of acute vertigo and 26 referred feeling unstable. Results of cochlear and vestibular findings differentiated for Koos classification are shown in Table III. Although patients with Koos 2 stage VS presented lower values of UW and PTA compared to other groups, no statistical difference was detected. Koos 4 patients referred a lower rate of lifetime rotational vertigo than other subjects. No difference was present for clinical history of imbalance.

Table III.

Cochlear and vestibular data.

Vertigo Imbalance Mean PTA in decibel Class of Hearing function Class of vestibular function UW% Hypervent
Koos 1 (n = 11) 5 (45%) 5 (45%) 49 ± 27 A = 4
B = 1
C = 4
D = 2
A = 1
B = 3
C = 6
D = 1
52 ± 21 9 (82%)
Koos 2 (n = 8) 3 (37%) 4 (50%) 25 ± 13 A = 5
B = 2
C = 1
A = 4
B = 4
29 ± 14 4 (50%)
Koos 3A
(n =15)
4 (27%) 3 (20%) 60 ± 30 A = 3
B = 6
C = 3
D = 3
A = 2
B = 5
C = 4
D = 4
46 ± 27 11 (73%)
Koos 3B
(n = 20)
6 (30%) 9 (45%) 57 ± 35 A = 4
B = 6
C = 6
D = 4
A = 2
B = 9
C = 5
D = 4
49 ± 25 16 (80%)
Koos 4A
(n = 10)
1 (10%) 5 (50%) 55 ± 34 A = 2
B = 3
C = 3
D = 2
A = 1
B = 6
C = 1
D = 2
47 ± 30 7 (70%)

PTA = Pure tone average, UW = unilateral weakness.

HIT was positive in 8 subjects in Koos stage 1 (80%), 6 in Koos 2 (75%), 12 in Koos 3a (80%), 19 in Koos 3b (95%) and 7 in Koos 4a (60%). All subjects with a positive hyperventilation test also presented a positive HIT. Finally, the total population of patients with a positive HIT demonstrated higher values of UW (p = 0.001).

All vestibular and cochlear results were compared to the ICL and ICD. ICL values ranged between 2.8 and 13.4 mm (mean 8.59 ± 2.65 mm) and the median was 8.8 mm. ICD values ranged between 1.1 and 10.8 mm (mean 5.22 ± 1.68 mm) and the median was 5.15 mm. The subgroup of 30 patients with a higher ICL of the tumour presented a higher value of UW than the subgroup with a lower length (51.9 ± 24.3% and 38.8 ± 18.1% respectively, p = 0.04), while no difference was seen for PTA values (50.9 ± 22.3 db and 51.1 ± 28.9 db, respectively). Moreover, patients with a higher ICL also presented a higher rate of positive HIT (88% and 60% respectively, p = 0.006). No difference between the two groups was detected in the hyperventilation test (72% and 70% of subjects, respectively). Finally, the subgroup of 30 patients with a higher value of ICD demonstrated higher values of UW (50.2 ± 29.1% and 39.3 ± 21% respectively, p = 0.03), but not different PTA (50.2 ± 29.1 db and 51.9 ± 29.9 db, respectively). No statistical difference for HIT was observed between these two groups (81% and 68%, respectively) and hyperventilation test (73% and 69%, respectively).

Discussion

Since VS originates from the vestibular nerve, a deficit of vestibular function should always be observed 28; nonetheless, vestibular impairments are rarely studied in preoperative workup, and most patients came to diagnosis because of hearing loss confirmed by audiometric exam. According to previous studies, the degree of the vestibular deficit correlates with both tumour size and growth rate 29. In our sample, only 18 subjects referred a previous episode of acute vertigo; in contrast, only 10 patients had normal vestibular assessment (15%; 1 subject in T1 stage, 4 in T2, 3 in T3a and 2 in T3b). Our data are in agreement with previously published data concerning vestibular abnormalities in patients with VS, reporting normal vestibular function in only 14% of cases. It should be also considered that only 26 subjects (40%) in our cohort referred imbalance; in our opinion, central compensation processes in slowly decreasing vestibular function may explain the significant difference with the rate of subjects presenting UW at caloric tests.

At present, the HIT proposed by Halmagyi and Curthois is widely used to detect vestibular peripheral hypofunction 30; hyperventilation, on the other hand, is an increasingly used bedside test and alkalosis provoked by the manoeuvre can produce a nystagmus normally beating towards the healthy side, probably disrupting central compensation. In our series, the hyperventilation test was positive in 73% of patients, while other authors reported a positive result in up to 91.7% of cases 31-33; in particular, we found no statistical difference in test responses between patients with higher or lower ICL /ICD. Moreover, according to some authors, caloric responses are well correlated with intraoperative findings and provide predictive factors for facial palsy and hearing outcome 34. The loss of vestibular function has been correlated with tumour size, although it is not strictly associated with a deterioration of the quality of life assessed with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory questionnaire 10.

Another previous study reported a higher incidence of vertigo in patients with small and medium size VS compared to patients harbouring larger tumours (> 4 cm) 35; in the present series, vestibular function correlated with the ICL and ICD of VS rather than with tumour volume or Koos stage. A possible explanation for this finding may be that the main mechanism of nerve injury is related to its compression inside the internal acoustic canal. On these bases, some authors proposed clinical intervention, such as vestibular rehabilitation in all patients with VS, and especially in subjects treated with surgical intervention or GKS 36.

Some authors advocate a wait-and-see strategy, especially for T1 stage VS, and focusing attention on tumour growth and hearing function 24 25 37. On the other hand, other demonstrated that the wait-and-see policy exposes patients to a high risk of tumour growth and hearing loss. Both events may occur independently in the mid-term period 38. To the best of our knowledge, nothing has been published on vestibular function in patients proposed for wait-and-see policy. The results of this study showed that vestibular function is more influenced by ICL and ICD, rather than by total tumour volume. Consequently, it is likely that a slight increase in ICL or ICD may produce alteration in the HIT and caloric responses, reflecting a poorer result in terms of vestibular function even after successful therapy at later times. It should be also considered that previous studies reported tumour growth control in 98% of patients treated with GKS, possibly avoiding a further increase in ICL and ICD with the possibility of hearing and vestibular preservation 19.

The data reported in the present study support the possibility of proactive GKS treatment even in patients harbouring small T1 VS. Nevertheless, a prospective study analyzing data on vestibular function after GKS is needed to confirm this possibility.

Conclusions

Vestibular disorders are probably underdiagnosed in patients with VS, and complete vestibular assessment should always be performed. ICL and ICD seem to be the main parameters that correlate with vestibular function even in patients harbouring small intracanalicular VS. Particular attention should be given to ICL and ICD in small T1 VS, in which even a slight increase of these variables can affect vestibular function. The data from the present study support the role of proactive treatment even in these patients. Nevertheless, a prospective study analysing data on vestibular function after GKS is needed to confirm this possibility.

Glossary

Abbreviations

VS:

Vestibular Schwannomas

GKS:

Gamma Knife

HIT:

Head Impulse Test

UW:

Unilateral Weakness

PTA:

Pure Tone Audiometry

ICD:

Intracanalicular Diameter

ICL:

Intracanalicular Lenght

SDS:

Speech Discrimination Score

References

  • 1.Roche PH, Bouvier C, Chinot O, et al. Genesis and biology of vestibular schwannomas. Prog Neurol Surg. 2008;21:24–31. doi: 10.1159/000156556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Propp JM, McCarthy BJ, Davis FG, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of vestibular schwannomas. Neuro Oncol. 2006;8:1–11. doi: 10.1215/S1522851704001097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tos M, Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P, et al. What is the real incidence of vestibular schwannoma? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:216–220. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.2.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Blakeley J. Development of drug treatments for neurofibromatosis type 2-associated vestibular schwannoma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20:372–379. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328357d2ee. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barbara M, Ronchetti F, Manni V, et al. Double localization of a unilateral sporadic vestibular schwannoma. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28:34–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Iacconi P, Faggioni M, Bartolomeis C, et al. Cervical sympathetic chain schwannoma: a case report. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32:133–136. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ginzkey C, Scheich M, Harnisch W, et al. Outcome on hearing and facial nerve function in microsurgical treatment of small vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach. Eur Arch Otolaryngol. 2013;270:1209–1216. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2074-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ragab A, Emara A, Shouker M, et al. Prospective evaluation of the clinical profile and referral pattern differences of vestibular schwannomas and other cerebellopontine angle tumors. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33:863–867. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318255dd59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wackym PA, Hannley MT, Runge-Samuelson CL, et al. Gamma Knife surgery of vestibular schwannomas: longitudinal changes in vestibular function and measurement of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. J Neurosurg. 2008;109(Suppl):137–143. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/12/S21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wagner JN, Glaser M, Wowra B, et al. Vestibular function and quality of life in vestibular schwannoma: does size matter? Front Neurol. 2011;2:e55–e55. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2011.00055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Montaguti M, Bergonzoni C, Zanetti MA, et al. Comparative evaluation of ABR abnormalities in patients with and without neurinoma of VIII cranial nerve. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007;27:68–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ushio M, Iwasaki S, Chihara Y, et al. Is the nerve origin of the vestibular schwannoma correlated with vestibular evoked myogenic potential, caloric test, and auditory brainstem response? Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129:1095–1100. doi: 10.1080/00016480802552543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huang CH, Wang SJ, Young YH. Correlation between caloric and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential test results. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012;132:160–166. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.624120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Day AS, Wang CT, Chen CN, et al. Correlating the cochleovestibular deficits with tumor size of acoustic neuroma. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008;128:756–760. doi: 10.1080/00016480701749240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Demonte F, Gidley PW. Hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma: experience with the middle fossa approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33:e10–e10. doi: 10.3171/2012.7.FOCUS12172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mazzoni A, Biroli F, Foresti C, et al. Hearing preservation surgery in acoustic neuroma. Slow progress and new strategies. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011;31:76–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mazzoni A, Zanoletti E, Calabrese V. Hearing preservation surgery in acoustic neuroma: long-term results. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012;32:98–102. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ansari SF, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33:e14–e14. doi: 10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Franzin A, Spatola G, Serra C, et al. Evaluation of hearing function after gamma knife surgery of vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27:e3–e3. doi: 10.3171/2009.9.FOCUS09196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mulder JJ, Kaanders JH, Overbeeke JJ, et al. Radiation therapy for vestibular schwannomas. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20:367–371. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328357d337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.2006. IRSA: Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with vestibular schwannoma.
  • 22.Chung WY, Liu KD, Shiau CY, et al. Gamma knife surgery for vestibular schwannoma: 10-year experience of 195 cases. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:87–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yomo S, Carron R, Thomassin JM, et al. Longitudinal analysis of hearing before and after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:877–885. doi: 10.3171/2012.7.JNS10672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bakkouri WE, Kania RE, Guichard JP, et al. Conservative management of 386 cases of unilateral vestibular schwannoma: tumor growth and consequences for treatment. J Neurosurg. 2009;110:662–669. doi: 10.3171/2007.5.16836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Godefroy WP, Kaptein AA, Vogel JJ, et al. Conservative treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a follow-up study on clinical and quality-of-life outcome. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30:968–974. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b4e3c9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Falcioni M, Piccioni LO, Taibah A, et al. Treatment of residual acoustic neurinomas. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2000;20:151–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. American Academy of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, INC , author. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113:179–180. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70101-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Erickson LS, Sorenson GD, McGavran MH. A review of 140 acoustic neurinomas (neurilemmoma) Laryngoscope. 1965;75:601–627. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196504000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stipkovits EM, Dijk JE, Graamans K. Electronystagmographic changes in patients with unilateral vestibular schwannomas in relation to tumor progression and central compensation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;256:173–176. doi: 10.1007/s004050050135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Black RA, Halmagyi GM, Thurtell MJ, et al. The active head-impulse test in unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:290–293. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.2.290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Califano L, Melillo MG, Vassallo A, et al. Hyperventilationinduced nystagmus in a large series of vestibular patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011;31:17–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bance ML, O'Driscoll M, Patel N, et al. Vestibular disease unmasked by hyperventilation. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:610–614. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199804000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Minor LB, Haslwanter T, Straumann D, et al. Hyperventilation- induced nystagmus in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Neurology. 1999;53:2158–2168. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.9.2158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tringali S, Charpiot A, Ould MB, et al. Characteristics of 629 vestibular schwannomas according to preoperative caloric responses. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31:467–472. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181cdd8b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Heerma H, Braun V, Richter HP. Effect of microneurosurgical operation in acoustic neurinoma on symptoms of vertigo and tinnitus. Hno. 2000;48:372–377. doi: 10.1007/s001060050583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wackym PA, Hannley MT, Runge-Samuelson CL, et al. Gamma knife surgery of vestibular schwannomas: longitudinal changes in vestibular function and measurement of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:137–143. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/12/S21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hughes M, Skilbeck C, Saeed S, et al. Expectant management of vestibular schwannoma: a retrospective multivariate analysis of tumor growth and outcome. Skull Base. 2011;21:295–302. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1284219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Regis J, Carron R, Park MC, et al. Wait-and-see strategy compared with proactive gamma knife surgery in patients with intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg. 2010;113:105–111. doi: 10.3171/2010.8.GKS101058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica are provided here courtesy of Pacini Editore

RESOURCES