Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine
. 2014 May;4(Suppl 1):S505–S509. doi: 10.12980/APJTB.4.2014B1168

Antibacterial activity of the essential oils of myrtle leaves against Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae

Abdollah Ghasemi Pirbalouti 1,2,*, Hamed Mirbagheri 3, Behzad Hamedi 2, Ebrahim Rahimi 3
Reviewed by: Bachir Raho Ghalem4
PMCID: PMC4025333  PMID: 25183140

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the antibacterial activity of the essential oil of Myrtus communis (M. communis) L. against Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (E. rhusiopathiae) in vitro.

Methods

Wild populations of M. communis collected from Khuzestan and Lorestan provinces, Southwest Iran, were examined for antibacterial activity and chemical variability in leaves. The in vitro antibacterial activity against E. rhusiopathiae was performed by agar disc diffusion and micro-dilution assays.

Results

The essential oils of M. communis have strong antibacterial against E. rhusiopathiae in both assays. The results showed that the major components of the oil were α-pinene (22.3%-55.2%), 1,8-cineole (8.7%-43.8%) and linalool (6.4%-14.5%). The inhibition zones and MIC values for bacteria which were sensitive to the essential oils of M. communis were in the range of 14.7-27.0 mm and 0.031-0.25 mg/mL, respectively.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that products with valuable antibacterial activity can be produced from leaves of M. communis against E. rhusiopathiae.

Keywords: Myrtus communis L.; Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae; Essential oil; 1,8-cineole; α-Pinene

1. Introduction

Erysipelas is an animal disease caused by Gram-positive bacteria Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (E. rhusiopathiae). Among the domestic animals, it suffers most frequently from the disease in human environment. This is a typical animal-borne disease observed mainly in occupational groups employed in agriculture, farming (of animals and birds), fishing and manufacturing industry. Erysipelas infection is a result of contact with infected animal, animal-borne contamination, animal-derived products or wastes. Infection in humans may have the following clinical course: mild form of skin infection diagnosed as erythema (erysipeloid), disseminated form of skin infection and the most serious form of infection of systemic course (endocarditis and sepsis)[1].

Myrtus communis L. (M. communis) (myrtle) (Myrtaceae) is an evergreen shrub which grows mainly in Mediterranean climates and has long been used by locals for its culinary and medicinal properties[2]. In Iran, the species commonly known as “Mord or Mort” is abundant in the Zagros mountainous range of the country[3]. M. communis is an important medicinal and aromatic plant, because of the high essential oil content in its leaf, flower and fruit glands. Leaves and berries are sources of essential oil that have medicinal properties including antimicrobial[4][7], antioxidant and antimutagenic[6],[8],[9], astringent, antiseptic, anti-hyperglycemic[6],[7],[10], antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory[11], insecticide[12],[13], nematicidal activity[14],[15]. In addition, myrtle berries and leaves are mostly employed for the industrial formulation of sweet liquors with digestive properties[16]. M. communis has been used since ancient times for medicinal, food, and spice purposes. In Iranian folk medicine, M. communis has been used as an infusion for various purposes such as for the skin discords, anti-septic (smoking), women diseases, wound (antimicrobial), digestive discords, astringent, good hair condition, bronchodilator, activities etc[17],[18].

In Iran, myrtle grows wild in different bioclimatic zones extending from the upper semi-arid to the lower humid. Populations of M. communis grow at altitudes ranging from 900 to 1 700 m, under a rainfall ranging from 400 to 600 mm/year. Piras et al. showed a variation in anthocyanins, flavonols and α-tocopherol from alcoholic extracts of myrtle berries obtained from seven different sites[19]. In 2000, Moradi reported that essential oil of leaves of M. communis growing in Iran contains 1,8-cineole, α-pinene, limonene, linalool, α-terpineol, β-myrcene, cis-isoeugenol, α-terpinyl acetate and linalyl acetate as major components[20]. Population fragmentation and wild harvesting with no rational control were the major factors influencing genetic diversity, structuring and population dynamics. Population bioclimatic preferences and geographic distances separation play a major role in this differentiation. To our knowledge, no documented reports on antibacterial activity of the essential oils of M. communis against E. rhusiopathiae are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the essential oil of M. communis against E. rhusiopathiae in vitro.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plants material

The leaves (0.5 kg) of five wild populations of M. communis were collected from different localities of two provinces (Lorestan and Khuzestan) in Iran at the early flowering stage on 1-20 June 2012 (Figure 1). The samples of the plants were identified by regional floras and authors with floristic and taxonomic references[21], and voucher specimens were deposited at the herbarium of I.A.U, Shahrekord Branch (No. IAUSHK-231).

Figure 1. The leaves of wild of M. communis were collected from different localities in Iran at the early flowering stage.

Figure 1.

2.2. Essential oil extraction

Harvested leaves of M. communis were dried at room temperature for 5 d. Dried leaves were grinded, and 100 g of tissue was distillated with 1 000 mL water for 3 h using a Clevenger-type apparatus according to the method recommended in British Pharmacopoeia[22]. The separated oil was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and stored in dark glass bottles at (4±1) °C prior to use.

2.3. Identification of the oil components

The oils were analyzed by an Agilent Technologies 5975 mass system with Agilent Technologies 7890 GC. HP-5 MS column (30 m×0.25 mm i.d., film thicknesses 0.25 µm) was used with helium as the carrier gas at flow of 0.8 mL/min. Column temperature was from 60 °C to 280 °C. Programmed temperature increase was 4 °C /min. Split ratio was adjusted at 40:1. The injector temperature was set at 300 °C. The purity of helium gas was 99.999% and 0.1 µL samples were injected manually in the split mode. GC/MS analysis was performed on above mentioned Agilent Technologies 5975 mass system. Mass spectra were recorded at 70 eV. Mass range was from m/z 50-550. Retention indices were calculated for all components using a homologous series of n-alkanes (C5-C24) injected in conditions equal to samples ones. Identification of oil components was accomplished based on comparison of their retention times with those of authentic standards and by comparison of their mass spectral fragmentation patterns (Wiley/ChemStation data system)[23].

2.4. Antibacterial test

2.4.1. Antibacterial activity with disc diffusion assay

The strain of E. rhusiopathiae was isolated from patient chickens provided by the Microbiology Laboratory, Veterinary Medicine Faculty, (I.A.U.) Iran. Bacteria strain was identified using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. The density of bacteria culture required for the test was adjusted to 5.0 McFarland standards, (1.0×107 CFU/mL) measured using the spectrophotometer (Eppendorf, AG, Germany). These experiments were performed by the disc diffusion method with some modification[24],[25]. Sterile paper discs (6 mm in diameter) were impregnated with 60 µL of dilutions of known essential oil concentrations (0.03-0.50 mg/mL) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Bacterial growth inhibition was determined as the diameter of the inhibition zones around the discs (mm). The growth inhibition diameter was an average of three measurements, taken at three different directions.

2.4.2. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)

The MIC values were evaluated using the broth micro-dilution method according to standard methods[26]. Stock solutions of the essential oil and antimicrobial standards (penicillin and gentamicin) were prepared in 5.0% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, the microorganism growth inhibition was evaluated by measuring absorbance at 630 nm, using a spectrophotometer. Experiments were performed in triplicate but at three different times.

2.4.3. Determination of minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)

The MBCs of essential oils were determined according to the MIC values. Five microliter from MIC tubes were transferred to agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The MBC was referred to the minimum concentration of essential oils with no viable bacteria.

2.5. Statistically analysis

Means and standard deviation of the samples were calculated. Each treatment was carried out with three replicates. Mean differences were determined by using Duncan's multiple range test at 5% level of significance. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19.0.

3. Results

The main chemical compositions of essential oils of various population of M. communis identified by GC-MS are presented in Table 1. Three main constituents of the essential oils were α-pinene (22.3%-52.2%), 1,8-cineole (8.7%-43.8%) and linalool (6.4%-14.5%).

Table 1. Main compositions of the essential oil of M. communis leaves collected from various regions.

Components RIa Percentage (%)b
Population-I Population-II Population-III Population-IV Population-V
α-pinenec 940 26.3 28.9 38.8 22.3 52.2
Limonene 1029 21.4 trd tr tr 6.3
1,8-cineole 1034 11.4 27.9 32.3 43.8 8.7
Linalool 1087 14.5 8.6 8.4 12.7 6.4
α-terpineol 1189 5.2 7.9 5.2 5.9 7.9
Linalyl acetate 1252 6.3 2.8 2.4 4.5 1.7

aRI: Retention index determined on HP-5MS capillary column; bCalculated from TIC data; cValues of major compounds are given as means; dtrace (<0.01%).

The in vitro antibacterial activity of the essential oil of wild populations of M. communis was assessed by the disc diffusion and micro-dilution methods against E. rhusiopathiae. Antibacterial activity was expressed as diameter of the inhibition zones, MIC and MBC values (Tables 2 and 3). The essential oils of M. communis exhibited varying levels of antibacterial activity against the investigated bacteria. The diameter of the inhibition zones values of different concentrations were between 14.7-27.0 mm. In general, a total of M. communis essential oil showed relatively high inhibitory activities against the bacteria tested (Table 2). The MICs of the essential oils were within concentration ranges 0.031-0.25 mg/mL, and the respective MBCs were 0.125-0.25 mg/mL (Table 3). The results showed that essential oils of various populations had high inhibitor activity against E. rhusiopathiae. The essential oil obtained from population-IV had the highest inhibitor activity against E. rhusiopathiae (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2. Antibacterial activity of the essential oils of M. communis against E. rhusiopathiae by disc diffusion assay.

Bacterial Concentration (µg/mL) Growth inhabitation (mm)
ANOVA
Population-I Population-II Population-III Population-IV Population-V
E. rhusiopathiae 500 19.00±1.73 20.00±0.00 22.00±0.00 18.67±2.08 15.67±2.87 P≤0.01
250 18.00±5.21 18.00±0.00 17.00±0.00 20.00±1.73 18.00±0.00 P≤0.05
125 14.67±4.04 15.33±5.79 24.00±0.00 27.00±0.00 24.33±2.89 P≤0.05
62 21.67±0.57 20.00±0.00 24.00±0.00 25.00±1.73 17.00±5.19 P≤0.05
31 19.67±2.89 20.00±0.00 16.00±0.00 25.00±0.00 24.00±0.00 P≤0.05
Mean 18.60±4.13b 18.67±2.89b 20.61±5.18b 23.13±3.85a 19.80±5.51b P≤0.05

Values are expressed as mean±SD.

Table 3. MICs and MBCs of the essential oils of M. communis against E. rhusiopathiae.

Pathogen Population-I (µg/mL)
Population-II (µg/mL)
Population-III (µg/mL)
Population-IV (µg/mL)
Population-V (µg/mL)
Pea (µg/mL)
Geb (µg/mL)
MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MIC
E. rhusiopathiae 31.2 62.5 250 62.5 125 31.2 250 62.5 125 62.5 250 62.5

aPe: penicillin, bGe: gentamicin.

4. Discussion

The results of the present study indicated the essential oil components of various populations of M. communis can be varied with genetic (landrace), environmental conditions and geographic origin[27]. The essential oils of M. communis were characterized by high levels of oxygenated monoterpenes (24.7%-66.9%) including 1,8-cineole, linalool and α-terpineol, followed by monoterpene hydrocarbon (22.3%-58.5%) including α-pinene and limonene. These monoterpenes are widespread components of the essential oils and used as fragrances and flavours in the cosmetic, perfume, drug and food industries. Comparison of our results with literature data allows our samples to be assigned to the chemotype α-pinene/1,8-cineole because of the high content of these two compounds[7]. Other studies showed that among the constituents of the essential oil of leaves and fruits of M. communis, the myrtenol, myrtenal and myrtenyl acetate presented[28][31]. The essential oil that we used for antimicrobial in vitro assay contained a high quantity of monoterpenes that according to literature do have antimicrobial activity. The antibacterial activity of M. communis essential oil may be attributed to the high level of α-pinene, a compound with known antimicrobial properties. There are published papers dealing with antimicrobial activity of essential oil principal components, such as α-pinene[32]. Regarding the mechanism of action of 1,8-cineole, once the phenolic compound crossed the microbial cellular membrane, interactions with membrane enzymes and proteins would cause an opposite flow of protons, affecting cellular activity[33],[34]. The mechanisms by which essential oil can inhibit microorganisms vary. In some cases it may be due to the hydrophobicity of the chemical (oil) which penetrates into the lipid bilayer of the cell membrane and makes the cells more permeable, leading to leakage of vital cell contents[35],[36]. This property could be resulted from the relatively high amount of monoterpenes (α-pinene and 1,8-cineole) in the essential oils of various populations especially population-V. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that products with valuable antibacterial activity can be produced from leaves of M. communis against E. rhusiopathiae. The essential oil of M. communis can be used as an alternative preservative instead of synthetic ones in veterinary pharmacy industry.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Deputy Researches and Technology, I.A.U., Shahrekord Branch, Iran (Grant No. IAUSHK: 6122).

Comments

Background

Many infections or diseases can be transmitted directly or indirectly between domestic animals and humans, for instance by consuming contaminated foodstuffs or through contact with infected animals, especially erysipelas. The need for new antimicrobial agents in the treatment of this animal disease is evident.

Research frontiers

The current investigation evaluates the in vitro antibacterial activity of essential oils of the leaves of M. communis against E. rhusiopathiae and their chemical composition were determined.

Related reports

E. rhusiopathiae causes an animal disease, erysipelas a superficial infection of the skin. In Iranian folk medicine, M. communis has been used as an infusion for various purposes such as for the skin discords, anti-septic (smoking), women diseases, wound (antimicrobial), etc.

Innovations and breakthroughs

Myrtus oil is used with great benefit in generally problematic skin. In the present study, authors have demonstrated the in vitro antibacterial activity of leaves oils of M. communis against E. rhusiopathiae.

Applications

The present study support and suggest the use of the essential oil of M. communis as an alternative preservative instead of synthetic ones in veterinary pharmacy industry.

Peer review

The authors of this important research have proved that essential oils of M. communis are potential and promising antibacterial agents which could be used as antibiotic in the protection of domestic animals and humans against E. rhusiopathiae. This conclusion was the result of chemical composition and antibacterial activity investigation.

Footnotes

Foundation Project: Supported by deputy Researches and Technology, I.A.U., Shahrekord Branch, Iran (Grant No. IAUSHK: 6122).

Conflict of interest statement: We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Andrychowski J, Jasielski P, Netczuk T, Czernicki Z. Empyema in spinal canal in thoracic region, abscesses in paravertebral space, spondylitis: in clinical course of zoonosis Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:S557–S563. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2289-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Atzei AD. [The plants in the folk tradition of Sardinia] Sassari, Italy: Carlo Delfino Editore; 2003. p. 594. Italian. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ghasemi PA. Medicinal plants used in Chaharmahal and Bakhtyari districts, Iran. Herba Pol. 2009;55:34–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ghasemi PA, Jahanbazi P, Enteshari S, Malekpoor F, Hamedi B. Antimicrobial activity of some of the Iranian medicinal plants. Arch Biol Sci. 2010;62:633–642. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zanetti S, Cannas S, Molicotti P, Bua A, Cubeddu M, Porcedda S, et al. Evaluation of the antimicrobial properties of the essential oil of Myrtus communis L. against clinical strains of Mycobacterium spp. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2010 doi: 10.1155/2010/931530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Messaoud C, Zaouali Y, Salah AB, Khoudja ML, Boussaid M. Myrtus communis in Tunisia: variability of the essential oil composition in natural populations. Flavour Fragr J. 2005;20:577–582. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Djenane D, Yangüela J, Amrouche T, Boubrit S, Boussad N, Roncalés P. Chemical composition and antimicrobial effects of essential oils of Eucalyptus globulus, Myrtus communis and Satureja hortensis against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus in minced beef. Food Sci Technol Int. 2011;17:505–515. doi: 10.1177/1082013211398803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hayder N, Skandrani I, Kilani S, Bouhlel I, Abdelwahed A, Ben Ammar RB, et al. Antimutagenic activity of Myrtus communis L. using the Salmonella microsome assay. S Afr J Bot. 2008;74:121–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mimica-Dukić N, Bugarin D, Grbović S, Mitić-Ćulafić D, Vuković-Gačić B, Orčić D, et al. Essential oil of Myrtus communis L. as a potential antioxidant and antimutagenic agents. Molecules. 2010;15:2759–2770. doi: 10.3390/molecules15042759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elfellah MS, Akhter MH, Khan MT. Anti-hyperglycaemic effect of an extract of Myrtus communis in streptozotocin induced diabetes in mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 1984;11:275–281. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(84)90073-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hosseinzadeh H, Khoshdel M, Ghorbani M. Antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory effects and acute toxicity of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Myrtus communis L. aerial parts in mice. Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2011;4:242–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jams.2011.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Motazedian N, Ravan S, Bandani AR. Toxicity and repellency effects of three essential oils against Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) J Agric Sci Tech. 2012;14:275–284. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tayoub G, Abu Alnaser A, Ghanem I. Fumigant activity of leaf essential oil from Myrtus communis L. against the Khapra Beetle. Int J Med Arom Plants. 2012;2:207–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fe Andrés M, González-Coloma A, Sanz J, Burillo J, Sainz P. Nematicidal activity of essential oils: a review. Phytochem Rev. 2012;11:371–390. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oka Y, Ben-Daniel B, Cohen Y. Nematicidal activity of the leaf powder and extracts of Myrtus communis against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica. Plant Pathol. 2012;61:1012–1020. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nuvoli F, Spanu D. Analisi e prospettive economiche dell'utilizzazionze industriale del mirto. Rivista Italiana EPPOS. 1996;12:231–236. Italian. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ghasemi Pirbalouti A. Medicinal and aromatic plants (introduction and application) 3rd ed. Iran: I.A.U. Shahrekord Branch Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ghasemi PG, Momeni M, Bahmani M. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by Kurd tribe in Dehloran and Abdanan districts, Ilam province, Iran. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2012;10:368–385. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v10i2.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Piras FM, Dettori MF, Magnani A. ToF-SIMS PCA analysis of Myrtus communis L. Appl Surf Sci. 2009;255:7805–7811. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moradi M, Kaykhaii M, Ghiasvand AR, Shadabi S, Salehinia A. Comparison of headspace solid-phase microextraction, headspace single-drop microextraction and hydrodistillation for chemical screening of volatiles in Myrtus communis L. Phytochem Anal. 2012;23:379–386. doi: 10.1002/pca.1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nordensram B, Rechinger K. H., editors. Flora Iranica, Fasc. 111–162 (1975–1987) Nord J Bot. 1989;8:625–626. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.British Pharmacopoeia Commission . British pharmacopoeia 1988. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1989. pp. 137–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Adams RP. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. 4th ed. Carol Stream, Illinois: Allured Publishing Corporation; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards . Washington D.C.: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1999. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents; approved guideline. [Online] Available from: http://isoforlab.com/phocadownload/csli/M26-A.pdf [Accessed on 15 January, 2014] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards . Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1993. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard. NCCLS document M2-A5. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2006. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard-seventh edition. [Online] Available from: http://isoforlab.com/phocadownload/csli/M7-A7.pdf [Accessed on 15 January, 2014] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ghasemi PA, Mohammadi M. Phytochemical composition of the essential oil of different populations of Stachys lavandulifolia Vahl. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013;3:123–128. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60036-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Asllani U. Chemical composition of albanian myrtle oil (Myrtus communis L.) J Essent Oil Res. 2000;12:140–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Brada M, Tabti N, Boutoumi H, Watheletc JP, Lognayd G. Composition of the essential oil of leaves and berries of Algerian myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) J Essent Oil Res. 2012;24:1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kiralan M, Bayrak A, Abdulaziz OF, Ozbucak T. Essential oil composition and antiradical activity of the oil of Iraq plants. Nat Prod Res. 2012;26:132–139. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2010.535149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Amri I, Mancini E, De Martino L, Marandino A, Lamia H, Mohsen H, et al. Chemical composition and biological activities of the essential oils from three Melaleuca species grown in Tunisia. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:16580–16591. doi: 10.3390/ijms131216580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stojkovic D, Sokovic MD, Glamoclija J, Dzamic A, Ristic M, Fahal A, et al. Susceptibility of three clinical isolates of Actinomodura madurae to alpha-pinene, the bioactive agent of Pinus pinaster turpentine oil. Arch Biol Sci. 2008;60:697–701. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stojkovic D, Sokovic M, Glamoclija J, Dzamic A, Ćirić A, Ristić M, et al. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Vitex agnus-castus L. fruits and leaves essential oils. Food Chem. 2011;128:1017–1022. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Davidson PM. Chemical preservatives and naturally antimicrobial compounds. In: Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, Montville TJ, editors. Food microbiology fundamentals and frontiers. Washington D.C.: ASM Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kim J, Marshall MR, Wei C. Antibacterial activity of some essential oil components against five foodborne pathogens. J Agric Food Chem. 1995;43:2839–2845. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Burt S. Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods: A review. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;94:223–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine are provided here courtesy of China Humanity Technology Publishing House

RESOURCES