Abstract
Benzo[alpha]pyrene (B[α]P) was used to test the possible antimutagenic effects of Arthrospira (Spirulina) maxima (SP) on male and female mice. SP was orally administered at 0, 200, 400, or 800 mg/kg of body weight to animals of both sexes for 2 weeks before starting the B[α]P (intraperitoneal injection) at 125 mg/kg of body weight for 5 consecutive days. For the male dominant lethal test, each male was caged with two untreated females per week for 3 weeks. For the female dominant lethal test, each female was caged for 1 week with one untreated male. All the females were evaluated 13–15 days after mating for incidence of pregnancy, total corpora lutea, total implants and pre- and postimplant losses. SP protected from B[α]P-induced pre- and postimplant losses in the male dominant lethal test, and from B[α]P-induced postimplantation losses in treated females. Moreover, SP treatment significantly reduced the detrimental effect of B[α]P on the quality of mouse semen. Our results illustrate the protective effects of SP in relation to B[α]P-induced genetic damage to germ cells. We conclude that SP, owing mainly to the presence of phycocyanin, could be of potential clinical interest in cancer treatment or prevention of relapse.
Key Words: : anticancer, antigenotoxic, antioxidant, blue-green algae, cyanobacterium
Introduction
Arthrospira (Spirulina) maxima (SP) is a general term for plants that belong to Cyanophyceae.1 It has been used as a food and nutritional supplement for a long time2 and represents one of the richest sources of plant protein (60–70%) and a good source of vitamins, carotenoids, essential amino acids, minerals, and essential fatty acids (e.g., γ-linolenic acid and sulfolipids).3,4 Moreover, SP has phycocyanin, a photosynthetic biliprotein, and its chief phytochemical phycocyanobilin.5
In addition to the aforementioned nutrimental properties, SP is considered a nutraceutic based on the different pharmacological properties that have been reviewed by Belay,6 Karkos et al.,7 and Khan et al.8 Recently, evidence was published about the effectiveness of SP in diabetic nephropathy9 and liver injuries.10 SP has also been shown to be effective against toxicity produced by cadmium,11 arsenic,12 mercuric chloride,13 zinc,11 and copper.14 Moreover, SP has been effective against teratogenicity induced by hydroxyurea,15 cancer in humans and animals,16,17 and mutagenicity.18 These properties could be due, in part, to the antioxidant capacity of the algae as a whole,10,19 its protean and water extracts,20,21 or bioactive components (such as phycocyanin).22 Moreover, it was demonstrated that SP did not produce genotoxicity in CD1 mice, using the dominant lethal test and sperm abnormalities assay.23
Benzo[alpha]pyrene (B[α]P), a prototypical mutagenic and carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, is a product of incomplete combustion or pyrolysis of organic material.24 It is found ubiquitously in cigarette smoke, urban air, charbroiled food, vehicle exhaust, asphalt, and coke ovens.25,26 It is a complete carcinogen, acting in both the initiation and growth promotion stages of chemical carcinogenesis,27 and it is thought to have negative effects on male reproduction,28 the immune system, embryonic development, and spermatogonial cells.28–31
Some studies have demonstrated that the genotoxicity of this polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon is highly associated with oxidative stress and DNA damage by electrophilic attack, thus decreasing the activity of endogenous antioxidants, while increasing the level of lipid peroxidation, reactive oxygen species, glutathione, and the percentage of cells in the G0/G1 phase.29,32 These effects are largely due to the metabolic activation of this hydrocarbon, principally triggered by cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes (CYP1A1 and CYP1B1) and resulting in the formation of the reactive B[α]P-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide (BPDE). This in turn leads to DNA miscoding adduct formation and subsequent mutations, which may initiate carcinogenesis (B[α]P).33,34
B[α]P and its metabolites also modulate mammalian gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms involving the aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling pathway and altered mitogenic signaling, to contribute to the tumor-promoting effects.29,35 Moreover, changes in microRNA-mRNA expression in human cells, part of the regulation of mammalian cell functions, have been used to identify molecular mechanisms of genotoxicity of B[α]P.36,37
For the last few years, there has been an increasing interest in carrying out in vivo and in vitro studies on the use of antigenotoxic agents for cancer treatment. Such agents include a wide variety of diets, plants, mushrooms, and algal extracts.38–42 These agents can block, inhibit, reverse, or retard the process of carcinogenesis through various processes, such as antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, induction of phase II enzymes, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest.43
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of SP on B[α]P, an indirect mutagen, in germ cells of male and female mice, using the dominant lethal test and the sperm abnormalities assay.
Materials and Methods
Animal husbandry and maintenance
Male and virgin female CF1 mice, 9–10 weeks old, were obtained from the Virology Institute Animal House (Secretary of Health, Mexico City).
The animals were housed in polycarbonate cages in an air-conditioned room (22°C±1°C, 50–60% relative humidity) with a photoperiod of 12 h, from 8 am to 8 pm. They were fed Purina rodent laboratory chow and tap water ad libitum. All the animals were acclimatized for at least 7 days before use. They were handled according to the Institutional Guidelines and Mexican Official Standard (NOM-062-ZOO-1999) regarding technical specifications for production, care, and use of laboratory animals. All the studies were approved by the Bioethical Committee of the National School of Biological Sciences (approval document ENCB/CBE/101/10/07) on October 3, 2007.
Test substances
B[α]P used in this study was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) and stored at room temperature. SP powder was from a bulk production batch supplied by Alimentos Esenciales Para la Humanidad, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico City, Mexico).
Experimental protocol
This study was conducted in two phases: a male dominant lethal phase and a female dominant lethal phase.44,45 In both cases, male and female animals were randomly divided into seven groups: (I) Control oil, (II) Control water, (III) B[α]P 125 mg/kg, (IV) SP 800 mg/kg, (V) B[α]P 125 mg/kg+SP 200 mg/kg, (VI) B[α]P 125 mg/kg+SP 400 mg/kg, and (VII) B[α]P 125 mg/kg+SP 800 mg/kg.
SP was administered through gastric intubation at doses of 0 (water), 200, 400, or 800 mg/kg, under a consistent volume factor of 10 mL/kg of body weight for 2 weeks before starting the B[α]P treatment. The dosage range was consistent with the doses employed in other studies on the antigenotoxicity of SP in mice.46,47
B[α]P was suspended in corn oil at a concentration of 12.5 mg/mL immediately before use and intraperitoneally injected at a daily dose of 125 mg/kg of body weight for 5 days. This dose is known to induce dominant lethal mutations in mice.48 We employed the most widely used approach for male dominant lethal studies to evaluate mutational effects at particular developmental stages of male germ cells,49–51 which is a daily injection for 5 consecutive days.
Male dominant lethal test
In this test, all 13 males, with or without SP treatment, were housed with two naive, nulliparous females overnight for 7 days (days 1–7) and then were again housed overnight with different females for 7 days (days 7 to 14 and days 15 to 21). Mating was determined by the presence of a vaginal plug on the morning after cohabitation. The day on which mating was detected was designated as gestation day 0, at which time the pregnant female was transferred to another cage. Cohabitation continued until copulation was detected.
Female dominant lethal test
In the female dominant lethal test, 10 untreated males were mated with 20 treated females (1–2) in each cage for 1 week, as previously described.
In both the male and female dominant lethal test, mated females were observed daily for signs of toxic effects. They were sacrificed on gestational day 13–15 by CO2 asphyxiation and cervical dislocation. A laparatomy was performed to observe the uterus and ovaries. The number of pregnant females, corpora lutea, implantation sites, and dead implants were recorded. The frequency of pre- and postimplantation losses was estimated. These data were analyzed for statistical significance against their respective controls by using the chi-square test, with significance set at P<.05. The protective index was calculated.
Sperm abnormalities
In each of the seven groups of male treated mice, six animals were sacrificed 1, 3, and 5 weeks after the last injection. The distal portion of the right epididymis and the vas deferens were immediately dissected by cutting the middle tail section and immersing it in 1 mL of saline solution at 37°C. A syringe with an additional 1 mL of the same solution was inserted into the previously opened vas deferens to perfuse the tissues. Then, the semen suspension was stirred and thoroughly mixed by repeated pipetting. The sperm concentration, motility, and morphology of each animal were assessed after homogenization as described by Albert and Roussel.52 Counts were made with a Thomas hemocytometer and results were expressed in millions of spermatozoa/mL of suspension. One drop of smear was mounted between a slide and a coverslip and was immediately examined to determine motility. The results are expressed in percentages. One hundred spermatozoa from each animal were analyzed and classified as either normal or abnormal. Head, midpiece, and main piece abnormalities were recorded. Finally, the left testis, epididymis, and seminal vesicles were weighed in the group sacrificed 5 weeks after the end of the B[α]P treatment. Testes histological analysis was not done. Data on sperm morphology, motility, and epididymal sperm count were analyzed by using the Mann–Whitney U-test. Data on sex organ weights were analyzed by the Student's t-test. Results were considered significant at P<.05. All analyses were performed by using the statistical software SigmaStat® version 2.03.
Results
Male dominant lethal test
Observations from this test are summarized in Table 1. Mating and pregnancy rates of females mated with B[α]P-treated males were high during 3 weeks of cohousing, with no difference found in relation to control values. However, preimplantation and postimplantation losses were significantly higher (P<.05) in the females mated with males treated only with B[α]P, in each of the three periods of cohabitation: 18.2, 16.8, and 19.8 for preimplantation and 19.5, 17.2, and 18.9 for postimplantation losses during the first, second, and third week, respectively.
Table 1.
Dose (mg/kg) | Mating interval (days) | No. of mated females | No. of pregnant females (%) | Total corpora lutea | Total implants | Frequency of preimplant lossa | Dead implants | Frequency of postimplant lossb | Protective index (%)c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control oil | 1–7 | 26 | 22 (84.6) | 229 | 200 | 12.6 | 19 | 9.5 | — |
8–14 | 26 | 24 (92.3) | 290 | 254 | 12.4 | 25 | 9.8 | — | |
15–21 | 26 | 23 (88.5) | 266 | 235 | 11.6 | 29 | 12.3 | — | |
Control water | 1–7 | 26 | 23 (88.4) | 282 | 250 | 11.1 | 29 | 11.8 | — |
8–14 | 26 | 24 (92.3) | 280 | 245 | 12.2 | 26 | 10.4 | — | |
15–21 | 26 | 24 (92.3) | 302 | 264 | 12.8 | 38 | 14.5 | — | |
B[α]P | 1–7 | 26 | 20 (79.6) | 250 | 204 | 18.2* | 40 | 19.5* | — |
8–14 | 26 | 21 (80.8) | 231 | 192 | 16.8** | 48 | 17.2*** | — | |
15–21 | 26 | 21 (80.8) | 237 | 190 | 19.8*** | 36 | 18.9* | — | |
SP800 | 1–7 | 26 | 26 (100) | 300 | 271 | 9.7 | 28 | 10.2 | — |
8–14 | 26 | 23 (88.4) | 271 | 241 | 11.1 | 24 | 9.8 | — | |
15–21 | 26 | 23 (88.4) | 264 | 230 | 12.9 | 26 | 11.3 | — | |
B[α]P+SP200 | 1–7 | 26 | 24 (92.3) | 281 | 249 | 11.4† | 31 | 12.6 | 35.6 |
8–14 | 26 | 25 (96.1) | 310 | 278 | 10.3† | 32 | 11.5††† | 33.1 | |
15–21 | 26 | 22 (84.6) | 264 | 238 | 9.8 | 24 | 10.2† | 39.4 | |
B[α]P+SP400 | 1–7 | 26 | 24 (92.3) | 283 | 253 | 10.5† | 30 | 11.7† | 47.8 |
8–14 | 26 | 21 (80.8) | 233 | 210 | 9.9† | 22 | 10.4††† | 24.9 | |
15–21 | 26 | 23 (88.5) | 278 | 251 | 9.6 | 25 | 10.0†† | 53.5 | |
B[α]P+SP800 | 1–7 | 26 | 24 (92.3) | 273 | 243 | 11.1† | 23 | 9.6†† | 77.3 |
8–14 | 26 | 25 (96.1) | 243 | 217 | 10.7 | 20 | 9.2††† | 69.7 | |
15–21 | 26 | 22 (84.6) | 305 | 274 | 10.1 | 22 | 8.1††† | 65.6 |
Frequency of preimplant loss=[(total corpora lutea−total implants)/total corpora lutea]×100.
Frequency of postimplant loss=(dead implants/total implants)×100.
Protective index (%)=100−[(frequency of postimplant loss SP+B[α]P treated)/frequency of postimplant loss B[α]P treated]×100.
Calculations were based on absolute figures and compared at the corresponding weeks. Those marked with asterisks differ significantly from the control oil value: *P<.05, **P<.01, ***P<.001. Those marked with daggers differ significantly from the B[α]P value: †P<.05, ††P<.01, †††P<.001.
B[α]P, benzo[alpha]pyrene (125 mg/kg, intraperitoneally); SP, Spirulina (200, 400, or 800 mg/kg by gastric intubation).
However, in females mated with B[α]P+SP-treated males, preimplantation and postimplantation losses during the first, second, and third week of mating were found in the same range as in the control group. Consequently, the protective index during each week was 35.6, 33.1, and 39.4 at the 200 mg/kg dose, 47.8, 24.9, and 53.5 at the 400 mg/kg dose, and 77.3, 69.7, and 65.6 at the 800 mg/kg dose, respectively. SP protected against the B[α]P-induced genotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner. There was no significant change in any of the parameters of genotoxicity in animals treated with SP alone at the 800 mg/kg dose.
Female dominant lethal test
Table 2 shows that mating and pregnancy rates of B[α]P-treated females were also not affected. Whereas preimplantation losses in B[α]P-treated females were similar to those in the control, the frequency of postimplantation losses was significantly different (P<.05), reaching 16.5% in the experimental group. However, pretreatment with 200, 400, and 800 mg/kg doses of SP significantly reduced the frequency of postimplantation losses to 9.2, 8.7, and 7.2, respectively, representing a protective index of 44.3, 47.3, and 56.4, respectively. As in the male dominant lethal test, SP alone did not induce a mutagenic effect per se.
Table 2.
Dose (mg/kg) | No. of mated females | No. of pregnant females (%) | Total corpora lutea | Total implants | Frequency of preimplant lossesa | Dead implants | Frequency of postimplant lossesb | Protective index (%)c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control oil | 20 | 17 (85) | 195 | 170 | 12.8 | 15 | 8.8 | — |
Control water | 20 | 18 (90) | 225 | 198 | 12.2 | 16 | 8.0 | — |
B[α]P | 20 | 15 (75) | 165 | 135 | 13.2 | 23 | 16.5††† | — |
SP800 | 20 | 18 (90) | 218 | 195 | 10.4 | 17 | 8.8 | — |
B[α]P+SP200 | 20 | 17 (85) | 187 | 166 | 11.3 | 14 | 9.2† | 44.3 |
B[α]P+SP400 | 20 | 16 (80) | 160 | 150 | 12.5 | 12 | 8.7† | 47.3 |
B[α]P+SP800 | 20 | 16 (80) | 184 | 162 | 11.8 | 11 | 7.2†† | 56.4 |
Frequency of preimplant loss=[(total corpora lutea−total implants)/total corpora lutea]×100.
Frequency of postimplant loss=(dead implants/total implants)×100.
Protective index (%)=100−[(frequency of postimplant loss SP+B[α]P treated)/frequency of postimplant loss B[α]P treated]×100.
Calculations were based on absolute figures. Those marked with daggers differ significantly from the B[α]P value: †P<.05; ††P<.01; †††P<.001.
Sperm abnormalities
The toxic effect of B[α]P and protective effect of SP on epididymal sperm is shown in Table 3. B[α]P treatment of male mice caused a significant decrease (P<.05) in sperm concentrations at 3 and 5 weeks, as well as in motility at 5 weeks after treatment. Treatment at the two higher doses of SP significantly reduced these effects. No changes were observed in the normal shape of the sperm.
Table 3.
Week | |||
---|---|---|---|
Dose (mg/kg) | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Sperm concentration (×106 mL) | |||
Control oil | 7.3±1.5 | 7.0±1.1 | 8.2±1.6 |
Control water | 7.9±1.2 | 7.6±0.9 | 8.0±1.3 |
B[α]P | 7.0±1.0 | 5.8±1.2* | 5.7±1.2* |
SP800 | 7.6±1.2 | 7.9±1.2 | 7.6±1.5 |
B[α]P+SP200 | 6.5±1.1 | 6.1±1.4 | 6.3±1.0 |
B[α]P+SP400 | 6.9±1.4 | 7.7±1.6† | 7.9±1.4† |
B[α]P+SP800 | 7.1±1.3 | 7.5±1.3† | 8.1±1.6†† |
Reduced sperm motility (%) | |||
Control oil | 15.9±3.5 | 16.0±2.5 | 15.8±3.4 |
Control water | 16.7±3.8 | 15.4±3.3 | 16.3±3.7 |
B[α]P | 15.8±4.2 | 14.8±2.9 | 19.8±3.2* |
SP800 | 16.2±4.4 | 15.1±2.7 | 16.2±4.3† |
B[α]P+SP200 | 16.5±4.6 | 15.2±3.0 | 15.7±3.9† |
B[α]P+SP400 | 15.7±3.6 | 16.1±3.6† | 16.0±3.8† |
B[α]P+SP800 | 16.0±4.5 | 15.6±3.1 | 16.4±4.1† |
Normal shaped sperm (%) | |||
Control oil | 71.1±4.2 | 68.9±4.0 | 66.6±4.8 |
Control water | 70.2±5.1 | 69.6±3.9 | 65.6±4.7 |
B[α]P | 71.6±5.0 | 69.2±4.1 | 65.7±4.2 |
SP800 | 68.4±4.8 | 70.5±4.6 | 68.2±5.0 |
B[α]P+SP200 | 68.8±4.7 | 68.7±4.0 | 60.2±3.8 |
B[α]P+SP400 | 70.1±5.3 | 70.3±3.7 | 64.8±3.5 |
B[α]P+SP800 | 69.9±5.4 | 68.8±3.7 | 63.9±3.9 |
Values are mean±stardard error.
Those marked with asterisks differ significantly from the control oil value: *P<.05. Those marked with daggers differ significantly from the B[α]P value: †P<.05; ††P<.01.
The testis, epididymis, and seminal vesicle weights significantly decreased (P<.05) in the group treated only with B[α]P (Table 4). However, the treatment with 400 and 800 mg/kg of SP significantly (P<.05) attenuated the weight loss of the testis and epididymis. The weight of seminal vesicles was also significantly improved with SP treatment.
Table 4.
Dose (mg/kg) | Terminal body weight (g) | Testis (g) | Epididymis (mg) | Seminal vesicles (mg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control oil | 35.8±3.7 | 0.598±0.06 | 58.1±2.8 | 0.20±0.02 |
Control water | 36.6±4.0 | 0.601±0.07 | 58.7±4.0 | 0.18±0.03 |
B[α]P | 35.6±3.8 | 0.507±0.08* | 48.8±3.0* | 0.12±0.01* |
SP800 | 36.0±4.2 | 0.611±0.05 | 57.8±4.1 | 0.15±0.04 |
B[α]P+SP200 | 36.2±4.5 | 0.550±0.04 | 50.5±3.6 | 0.22±0.04†† |
B[α]P+SP400 | 34.9±3.9 | 0.604±0.05† | 60.4±4.4† | 0.19±0.03† |
B[α]P+SP800 | 37.0±3.6 | 0.614±0.07† | 58.7±3.9† | 0.19±0.03† |
Values are mean±standard error.
Those marked with asterisks differ significantly from the control oil value: *P<.05. Those marked with daggers differ significantly from the B[α]P value: †P<.05; ††P<.01.
Discussion
Dominant lethal mutations are genetic changes induced in parent germ cells that cause the death of the resulting zygote, its failure to implant, or early embryonic death if implanted.53 The dominant lethal test is the primary germ cell mutagenicity assay for determining the existence of dominant lethal mutations.54 Studying the increase of sperm abnormalities in mice is also a good model for detecting possible genotoxicity caused by chemical agents.55
The mating rate observed in the current study, whether with treated males or treated females, was not significantly different compared with that observed in the control group, indicating that there was no decrease in the pregnancy of the animals in the experimental groups. In untreated female mice mated with B[α]P-treated males, pre- and postimplantation losses were significantly increased in each of the three periods of cohabitation. On the other hand, in B[α]P-treated females mated with untreated males, only postimplantation losses were significantly increased. These results suggest that in B[α]P-treated females, lesions were induced in the mature dictyate oocyte56 and that both sexes were similarly sensitive to B[α]P toxicity.
The three post-treatment periods after B[α]P application account for the postmeiotic stages of spermatogenesis, where germ cell stages in males were found to be most sensitive to damaged induction.57 Days 1–7 correspond to epididymal spermatozoa, days 8–14 to testicular spermatids, and days 15–21 to early spermatids.58
Treatment with SP alone at 800 mg/kg did not induce dominant lethality in either males or females. This result is also in agreement with previous reports, where rats and mice were given the algae at various concentrations in their diet to test for genotoxicity.23,59
In the different groups treated with SP+B[α]P, the prevention of genotoxicity was evidenced by a significant decrease in the frequency of pre- and postimplantation losses (with the exception of the first week of the animals that received 200 mg/kg of SP, Table 1), as compared with the control group (B[α]P) only treatment, and therefore by an increase in the protective index, calculated based on the frequency of postimplantation losses.
The protective index of SP was generally dose dependent and was above that reported for natural products such as black tea (also employing the male and female dominant lethal test).60 The greatest protective effect (77%) was found with the dose of 800 mg/kg of SP during the mating interval period, which corresponds to epididymal spermatozoa.
Antimutagenic protection of SP has also been found against cyclophosphamide, employing the rodent dominant assay in mice47 and against mitomycin-C, cisplatin and urethane, marrow, using the micronucleous test.18,46 Moreover, a radioprotective effect in mice has been reported.61 Additionally, the Tradescantia bioassay provides evidence of the anticlastogenic properties of this cyanobacterium.62 Other natural products and phytochemicals have shown comparative mutagenic protection against B[α]P, based on their antidoxidant activity, capture of free radicals, modulation of cell metabolism, stimulation of apoptosis, or other mechanisms.60,63–67
The antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic effects of SP have been attributed, in many in vitro and in vivo studies, to its antioxidant and antiapoptotic capacity.68 Indeed, the capacity of SP to reduce levels of lipid peroxidation has been demonstrated, levels that are increased by B[α]P treatment.69 There are also reports on its capacity to increase the enzymatic activity of antioxidant biomarkers (superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione-transferase),13,70 activity that is decreased by B[α]P treatment.69
The antioxidant properties can be attributed to bioactive compounds found in SP, such as carotenoids (especially of β-carotene), omega 3, polyunsaturated fatty acids, provitamins, and other vitamins (including A, B, and E).21,71,72 However, a great majority of studies demonstrate that the principal molecule responsible for this property is phycocyanin. This substance has shown a powerful antioxidant and antiproliferative activity against human cancer cells through apoptosis and nuclear apoptosis induction accompanied by G0/G1 phase arrest and DNA fragmentation.73 Phycocyanin alone has significant free radical scavenging74–77and anticancer effects78,79 and can be combined with other anticancer drugs, such as topotecan.80 On the other hand, in combination with piroxicam, phycocyanin can stimulate cytochrome C release by downregulating the Bcl-2 (an antiapoptotic protein) expression, thus mediating mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis in DMH-induced colon cancer.81
Previous reports of decreased epididymal sperm concentration and motility after treatment of rats with B[α]P47 were confirmed by the current study. This could be due to a direct effect on the spermatogenic compartment. Our study demonstrated that SP treatment substantially buffered B[α]P-induced testicular spermatogenic cell damage, providing further evidence of its antigenotoxic activity.
SP belongs to one of the few algal species that has a proven antioxidant activity and scavenging effect.19 It is probable that phycocyanin and various components are involved as studies have shown that the synergistic action of a wide spectrum of antioxidants is more efficient than only one such agent. Furthermore, it is known that antioxidants from natural sources (primarily food) have a higher bioavailability and therefore a higher protective efficacy than synthetic ones. 82
We conclude that SP exhibited a protective effect against B[α]P-induced genetic damage to germ cells in male and female mice, and may serve as a natural agent in cancer treatment or chemoprevention.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported, in part, by the grant 708555, SIP, I.P.N., México; G.C.C., L.G.S., and E.M.G. are fellows of the EDI and COFAA/IPN Programs. The authors are grateful to A. Larsen for reviewing the English in this manuscript.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
References
- 1.Iwata K, Inayama T, Kato T: Effects of Spirulina platensis on plasma lipoprotein lipase activity in fructose-induced hyperlipidemic rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 1990;36:165–171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cingi C, Conk-Dalay M, Cakli H, Bal C: The effects of Spirulina on allergic rhinitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008;265:1219–1223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dartsch PC: Antioxidant potential of selected Spirulina platensis preparations. Phytother Res 2008;22:627–633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mendes RL, Nombre BP, Cardoso MT, Pereira AP, Palavra AF: Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of compounds with pharmaceutical importance from microalgae. Inorg Chim Acta 2003;356:328–334 [Google Scholar]
- 5.McCarty MF: Nutraceutical strategies for ameliorating the toxic effects of alcohol. Med Hypotheses 2013;80:456–462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Belay A: Current knowledge on potential health benefits of Spirulina. J Appl Phycol 2003;5:235–241 [Google Scholar]
- 7.Karkos PD, Leong SC, Karkos CD, Sivaji N, Assimakopoulos DA: Spirulina in clinical practice: evidence-based human application. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011;2011:531053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Khan Z, Bhadouria P, Bisen PS: Nutritional and therapeutic potential of Spirulina. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2005;6:373–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zheng J, Inoguchi T, Sasaki S, Maeda Y, McCarty MF, Fujii M, Ikeda N, Kobayashi K, Sonoda N, Takanayagi R: Phycocyanin and phycocyanobilin from Spirulina platensis protect against diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting oxidative stress. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2013;4:110–120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lu J, Ren DF, Wang JZ, Sanada H, Egashira Y: Protection by dietary Spirulina platensis is against D-galactosamine- and acetaminophen-induced liver injuries. Br J Nutr 2010;103:1573–1576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pane L, Solisio C, Lodi A, Mariottini GL, Converti A: Effect of extracts from Spirulina platensis bioaccumulating cadmium and zinc on L929 cells. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 2008;70:121–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Saha SK, Misbahuddin M, Khatun R, Mamun IR: Effect of hexane extract of Spirulina in the removal of arsenic form isolated liver tissue of rat. Mymensingh Med J 2005;14:191–195 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.El-Desoky GE, Bashandy SA, Abrahim IM, Aboul-Soud MA, Yusuf K: Improvement of mercuric chloride-induced testis injuries and sperm quality deteriorations by Spirulina platensis in rats. PLoS One 2013;8:e59177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.James R, Sampath K, Nagarajan R, Vellaisamy P, Manikandan MM: Effect of dietary Spirulina on reduction of copper toxicity and improvement of growth, blood parameters and phosphatases activities in carp, Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton, 1822). Indian J Exp Biol 2009;47:754–759 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vazquez-Sanchez J, Ramon-Gallegos E, Mojica-Villegas A, Madrigal-Bujaidar E, Perez-Pasten-Borja R, Chamorro-Cevallos G: Spirulina maxima and its protein extract protect against hydroxyurea-teratogenic insult in mice. Food Chem Toxicol 2009;47:2785–2789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Szumiło J, Podlodowska J, Podlodowski W, Starosławska E, Burdan F: Chemoprevention of oral cancer in clinical and experimental studies. Pol Merkur Lekarski 2012;32:138–142 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Grawish ME: Effects of Spirulina platensis extract on Syrian hamster cheek pouch mucosa painted with 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene. Oral Oncol 2008;44:956–962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Premkumar K, Abraham SK, Santhiya ST, Gopinath PM, Ramesh A: Protective effect of Spirulina fusiformis on chemical-induced genotoxicity in mice. Fitoterapia 2004;75:24–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Banji D, Banji OJ, Pratusha NG, Annamalai AR: Investigation on the role of Spirulina platensis in ameliorating behavioural changes, thyroid dysfunction and oxidative stress in offspring of pregnant rats exposed to fluoride. Food Chem 2013;140:321–331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Piñero-Estrada JE, Bermejo-Bescós P, Villar del Fresno AM: Antioxidant activity of different fractions of Spirulina platensis protean extract. Farmaco 2001;56:497–500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wu LC, Ho JAA, Shieh MC, Lu IW: Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of Spirulina and Chlorella water extracts. J Agric Food Chem 2005;53:4207–4212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Riss J, Décordé K, Sutra T, Delage M, Baccou JC, Jouy N, Brune JP, Oréal H, Cristal JP, Rouanet JM: Phycobiliprotein C-phycocyanin from Spirulina platensis is powerfully responsible for reducing oxidative stress and NADPH oxidase expression induced by an atherogenic diet in hamsters. J Agric Food Chem 2007;55:7962–7967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chamorro G, Salazar M: Dominant lethal assay of Spirulina maxima in male CD-1 mice after short-term and prolonged-term feeding. J Food Prot 1998;52:125–127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bhalli JA, Shaddock JG, Pearce MG, Dobrovolsky VN, Cao X, Heflich RH, Vohr HW: Report on stage III pig-a mutation assays using benzo[a] pyrene. Environ Mol Mutagen 2011;52:731–737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hattemer-Frey HA, Travis CS: Benzo-a-pyrene environmental partitioning and human exposure. Toxicol Ind Health 1991;7:141–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Guza R, Kotandeniya D, Murphy K, Dissanayake T, Lin C, Giambasu GM, Lad RR, Wojciechowski F, Amin S, Sturla SJ, Hudson RH, York DM, Jankowiak R, Jones R, Tretyakova NY: Influence of C-5 substituted cytosine and related nucleoside analogs on the formation of benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-dG adducts at CG base pairs of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:3988–4006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yoo EJ, Lee BM: Chemopreventive effects of aloe against genotoxicity induced by benzo[a]pyrene. J Toxicol Environ Health 2005;68:1841–1860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Revel A, Raanani H, Younglai E, Xu J, Han R, Savouret JF, Casper RF: Resveratrol, a natural aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonist, protects sperm from DNA damage and apoptosis caused by benzo[a]pyrene. Reprod Toxicol 2001;15:479–486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Miller K, Ramos Kenneth S: Impact of cellular metabolism on the biological effects of benzo[a]pyrene and related hydrocarbons. Drug Metab Rev 2000;33:1–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Verhofstad N, Oostrom C, Zwart E, Maas L, Benthem J, Schooeten F, Steeg H, Godschalk R: Evaluation of benzo(a)pyrene-induced gene mutations in male germ cells. Toxicol Sci 2011;119:218–223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Murugaiyan J, Rockstroh M, Wagner J, Baumann S, Schorsch K, Trump S, Lehmann I, Bergen M, Tomm J: Benzo[a]pyrene affects Jurkat T cells in the activated state via the antioxidant response element dependent Nrf2 pathway leading to decreased IL-2 secretion and redirecting glutamine metabolism. Toxicol Appl Pharm 2013;269:307–316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wei W, Li X, Chen X, Liu A, Lu W: Oxidative stress and cell-cycle change induced by coexposed PCB126 and benzo(a)pyrene to human hepatoma (HepG2) cells. Environ Toxicol 2012;7:316–320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zheng Z, Park S, Lee M, Phark S, Won N, Kang H, Sul D: Effects of benzo(a)pyrene on the expression of heat shock proteins, pro-inflammatory cytokines and antioxidant enzymes in hepatic tumors induced by rat hepatoma N1-S1 Cells. J Korean Med Sci 2011;26:222–230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vanhees K, Van-Schooten F, Moonen E, Maas L, Van-Waalwijk S, Godschalk R: Maternal intake of quercetin during gestation alters ex vivo benzo[a]pyrene metabolism and DNA adduct formation in adult offspring. Mutagenesis 2012;27:445–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Trilecová L, Krcková S, Marvanová S, Penciková P, Krcmár P, Neca J, Hulinková P, Pálkova L, Ciganek M, Milcová A, Topinka J, Vondracek J, Machala M: Toxic effects of benzo[a]pyrenes in liver stem-like cells. Chem Res Toxicol 2011;24:866–876 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Elamin B, Callegari E, Gramantieri L, Sabbioni S, Negrini M: MicroRNA response to environmental mutagenes in liver. Mutat Res 2011;717:67–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lizarraga D, Gaj S, Brauers K, Timmermans L, Kleinjans J, Van-Delft J: Benzo[a]pyrene-induced changes in microRNA-mRNA networks. Chem Res Toxicol 2012;25:838–849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ferguson LR: Antimutagens as cancer chemoprotective agents in the diet. Mutat Res 1994;307:395–410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kusamram WR, Tepesuwan A, Kupradeinum P: Antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic potential of some Thai vegetables. Mutat Res 1998;402:247–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zunino SJ, Zhang YJ, Seeram NP, Storms DH: Berry fruit extracts inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells in vitro. J Funct Foods 2010;2:187–195 [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chung JG, Peng HY, Chu YC, Hsieh YM, Wang SD, Chou ST: Anti-invasion and apoptosis induction of chlorella (Chlorella sorokiniana) in Hep G2 human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Funct Foods 2012;4:302–310 [Google Scholar]
- 42.Roupas P, Keogh J, Noakes M, Margetts C, Taylor P: The role of edible mushrooms in health: evaluation of the evidence. J Funct Foods 2012;4:687–709 [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pan MH, Ho CT: Chemopreventive effects of natural dietary compounds on cancer development. Chem Soc Rev 2008;37:2558–2574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sudman PD, Rutledge JC, Bishop JB, Generoso WM: Bleomycin: female-specific dominant lethal effects in mice. Mutat Res 1992;296:143–156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Holmstrom LM, Palmer AK, Favor J: The rodent dominant lethal assay. In: Supplementary Mutagenicity Tests. (Kirkland DJ, Fox M, eds.) University Press, Cambridge, 1993, pp. 129–156 [Google Scholar]
- 46.Premkumar K, Pachiappan A, Abraham SK, Santhiya ST, Gopinath PM, Ramesh A: Effect of Spirulina fusiformis on cyclophosphamide and mitomycin-C induced genotoxicity and oxidative stress in mice. Fitoterapia 2001;72:906–911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chamorro-Cevallos G, Garduno-Siciliano L, Barron BL, Madrigal-Bujaidar E, Cruz-Vega DE, Pages N: Chemoprotective effect of Spirulina (Arthrospira) against cyclophosphamide-induced mutagenicity in mice. Food Chem Toxicol 2008;46:567–574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jahangir T, Sultana S: Benzo(a)pyrene-induced genotoxicity: attenuation by farnesol in a mouse model. J Enzym Inhib Med Chem 2008;23:888–894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Green S, Auletta A, Fabricant J, Kapp R, Manandhar M, Sheu CJ, Springer J, Whitfield B: Current status of bioassays in genetic toxicology—the dominant lethal assay: a report of the U.S. environmental protection agency gene-tox program. Mutat Res Rev Genet Toxicol 1985;154:46–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Green S, Lavappa KS, Manandhar M, Sheu CJ, Whorton E, Springer JA: A guide for mutagenicity testing using the dominant lethal assay. Mutat Res 1987;189:167–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Krishna G, Petrere J, Anderson J, Theiss J: Use of cyclophosphamide as a positive control in dominant lethal and micronucleus assays. Mutat Res 1995;335:331–337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Albert M, Roussel C: Changes from puberty to adulthood in the concentration, motility and morphology of mouse epididymal spermatozoa. Int J Androl 1983;6:446–460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Burki K, Sheridan W: Expression of TEM-induced damage to postmeiotic stages of spermatogenesis of the mouse during early embryogenesis. I. Investigations with in vitro embryo culture. Mutat Res 1978;49:259–268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ashby J, Clapp MJ: The rodent dominant lethal assay: a proposed format for data presentation that alerts to pseudo-dominant lethal effects. Mutat Res 1995;330:209–218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Singh H, Tate F: Antispermatogenic effects of ethyl methanesulfonate and benzo[a]pyrene in PD4 Lakeview hamsters. J Toxicol Environm Health 1981;8:929–937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Generoso WM, Katoh M, Cain KT, Hughes LA, Foxworth LB, Mitchell TJ, Bishop JB: Chromosome malsegregation and embryonic lethality induced by treatment of normally ovulated mouse oocytes with nocodazole. Mutat Res 1989;210:313–322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Anderson D, Bishop JB, Garner RC, Ostrosky-Wegman P, Selby PB: Cyclophosphamide: review of its mutagenicity for an assessment of potential germ cell risks. Mutat Res 1995;330:115–181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Preston RJ, Fennell TR, Leber AP, Sielken RL, Jr, Swenberg JA: Reconsideration of the genetic risk assessment for ethylene oxide exposures. Environ Mol Mutagen 1995;26:189–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chamorro G, Salazar M, Pages N: Dominant lethal study of Spirulina maxima in male and female rats after short-term feeding. Phytother Res 1996;10:28–32 [Google Scholar]
- 60.Shukla Y, Taneja P: Antimutagenic effect of black tea extract using rodent dominant lethal mutation assay. Toxicology 2001;168:269–274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Qishen P, Guo BJ, Kolman A: Radioprotective effect of extract from Spirulina platensis in mouse bone marrow cells studied by using the micronucleus test. Toxicol Lett 1989;48:165–169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ruiz Flores LE, Madrigal-Bujaidar E, Salazar M, Chamorro G: Anticlastogenic effect of Spirulina maxima extract on the micronuclei induced by maleic hydrazide in Tradescantia. Life Sci 2003;72:1345–1351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Smarth R, Panwar M, Kumar A: Modulatory effects of mentha piperita on lung tumor incidence genotoxicity, and oxidative stress in benzo[a]pyrene-treated Swiss albino mice. Environ Mol Mutagen 2006;47:192–198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Angeli J, Ribeiro L, Angeli J, Mantovani M: Protective effects of beta-glucan extracted from barley against benzo[a]pyrene-induced DNA damage in hepatic cell HepG2. Exp Toxicol Pathol 2009;61:83–89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chang J, Bae J, Oh E, Kim J, Park S, Lee K: Cancer preventive potential of methanol extracts of Hypsizigus marmoreus. J Med Food 2009;12:493–500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bhangavathy S, Sumathi P: Evaluation antigenotoxic effects of carotenoids from green algae Chlorococcum humicola using human lymphocytes. Asian Pac Trop Biomed 2012;2:109–117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Malhotra A, Nair P, Dhawan D: Curcumin and resveratrol in combination modulates benzo(a)pyrene-induced genotixicity during lung carcinogenesis. Hum Exp Toxicol 2012;31:1199–1206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Belay A: The potential application of Spirulina (Arthrospira) as a nutritional and therapeutic supplement in health management. J Am Nutr Assoc 2002;5:27–49 [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sehgal A, Kumar M, Jain M, Dhawan D: Piperine as as adjuvant increases the efficacy of curcumin in mitigating benzo(a)pyrene toxicity. Hum Exp Toxicol 2012;31:473–482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Viswanada V, Sivan S, Rajendra S: Protective effect of Spirulina against 4-nitroquilina-1-oxide induced toxicity. Med Biol Rep 2011;38:309–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rovito D, Giordano C, Vizza D, Plastina P, Barone I, Casaburi I, Lanzino M, De Amicis F, Sisci D, Mauro L, Aquila S, Catalano S, Bonofiglio D, Andò S: Omega-3 PUFA ethanolamides DHEA and EPEA induce autophagy through PPARgamma activation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. J Cell Physiol 2013;228:1314–1322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Dufes C: Delivery of the vitamin E compound tocotrienol to cancer cells. Ther Deliv 2011;2:1385–1389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Thangam R, Suresh V, Asenath W, Rajkumar M, Kaanna S: C-Phycocyanin from Oscillatoria tennuis exhibited an antioxidant and in vitro antiproliferative activity through induction of apoptosis and G0/G1 cell cycle arrest. Food Chem 2013;140:262–272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Benedetti S, Benvenuti F, Pagliarani S, Francogli S, Scoglio S, Canestrari F: Antioxidant properties of a novel phycocyanin extract from the blue-green alga Aphanizomenon flos-aquae. Life Sci 2004;75:2353–2362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Patel K, Chen Y, Dennehy K, Blau J, Connors S, Mendonca M, Tarpey M, Krishna M, Mitchell JB, Welch WJ, Wilcox CS: Acute antihypertensive action of nitroxides in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2006;290:R37–R43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Remirez D, Fernandez V, Tapia G, Gonzalez R, Videla LA: Influence of C-phycocyanin on hepatocellular parameters related to liver oxidative stress and Kupffer cell functioning. Inflamm Res 2002;51:351–356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bhat VB, Madyastha KM: C-phycocyanin: a potent peroxyl radical scavenger in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2000;275:20–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Morcos NC, Berns M, Henry WL: Phycocyanin: laser activation, cytotoxic effects, and uptake in human atherosclerotic plaque. Laser Surg Med 1988;8:10–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Basha OM, Hafez RA, El-Ayouty YM, Mahrous KF, Bareedy MH, Salama AM: C-Phycocyanin inhibits cell proliferation and may induce apoptosis in human HepG2 cells. Egypt J Immunol 2008;15:161–167 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Gantar M, Dhandayuthapani S, Rathinavelu A: Phycocyanin induces apoptosis and enhances the effect of topotecan on prostate cell line LNCaP. J Med Food 2012;15:1091–1095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Saini M, Vaiphei K, Sanyal S: Chemoprotecion of DMH-induced rat colon carcinoma initiation by combination administration of pioxicam and C-phycoyanin. Mol Cell Biochem 2012;361:217–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gey KF: Vitamins E plus C and interacting conutrients required for optimal health. A critical and constructive review of epidemiology and supplementation data regarding cardiovascular disease and cancer. Biofactors 1998;7:113–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]