Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2012 Nov 19;92(12):1801. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2012.138

Slug enhances invasion ability of pancreatic cancer cells through upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and actin cytoskeleton remodeling

Kejun Zhang, Dong Chen, Xuelong Jiao, Shaoyan Zhang, Xiangping Liu, Jingyu Cao, Liqun Wu, Dongsheng Wang
PMCID: PMC4026930  PMID: 23191991

Retraction to: Laboratory Investigation (2011) 91, 426–438; doi:10.1038/labinvest.2010.201; published online 31 January 2011

The authors of this article have requested its retraction from Laboratory Investigation because of their inability to reproduce key experiments:

Zhang K, Chen D, Jiao X, Zhang S, Liu X, Cao J, Wu L, Wang D. Slug enhances invasion ability of pancreatic cancer cells through upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and actin cytoskeleton remodeling. Lab Invest 2011;91:426–438.

This paper reports that Slug transfection does not affect E-cadherin expression. However, upon repeating the experiment, we found Slug transfection significantly reduces the E-cadherin expression. Additionally, MMP-2 was upregulated in new experiments.

The paper also reveals that intracellular F-actin and MMP-9 levels are increased and relocated to the tip of the extending pseudopodia from the perinuclear pool in Slug-transfected PANC-1 cells. However, upon repeating the experiment, it appeared that only F-actin, not MMP-9, was relocated to the tip of the extending pseudopodia. Therefore, the cellular localization of the MMP-2 cells needs further investigation.

Furthermore, there were several minor errors in the paper:

  1. The primer sequence for E-cadherin should be 5′-GGAAGTCAGTTCAGACTCCAGCC-3′ and 5′-AGGCCTTTTGACTGTAATCACACC-3′ not 5′-TTCAGTTCCGAGGTCTACAC-30; antisense: 30-GTCTCTGTGGTGATGCCGGT-5, as was reported.

  2. The wrong reference was cited for the BB94 treatment. The correct concentration was 0.25 μmol/l, not 0.1 umol/l, as was written.

  3. Female C57BL/6 mice were at 4–6 weeks, not 6–8 weeks of age.

  4. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 7.0 software, not SPSS 13.

The authors regret the impact that these inconsistencies and errors may have had on other researchers.


Articles from Laboratory Investigation; a Journal of Technical Methods and Pathology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES