Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;66(4):452–453. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.14

“Familiality” or Heritability

Kenneth S Kendler, Michael C Neale
PMCID: PMC4028600  NIHMSID: NIHMS572908  PMID: 19349315

In their recent article, Hong et al1 reported heritabilities of auditory sensory gating. As they defined it in their article, heritability reflects the proportion of overall variability in a trait in a population that results from additive genetic effects. Within human populations, such estimates have traditionally relied on special relationships that can (with some well-understood limitations) disentangle genetic from familial-environmental effects. The most popular of these methods have been twin studies comparing monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs and various adoption designs.

However, in their study, Hong et al do not use these standard approaches. Rather, they examine individuals with schizophrenia (n=102) and 74 of their first-degree relatives. Heritabilities are estimated from sibling-sibling and parent-offspring pairs using the program SOLAR.2 The problem with this approach is that data from these 2 relationships alone do not contain information that can, with any confidence, disentangle genetic from familial-environmental sources of resemblance. This is because for the major source of genetic resemblance—additive genetic effects—the expected correlation is the same in both of these relationships: +0.50. It is true that nonadditive genetic effects contribute to sib-sib but not to parent-offspring resemblance. However, given that there may be considerable sharing of environmental factors for both of these relationships, the a priori assumption that their effects are absent is hard to justify for many phenotypes.

We do not herein claim that heritability estimates from twin or adoption studies are without concerns. But they are based on well-understood quantitative genetic principles and their limitations have been widely examined (see Kendler and Prescott3 for concerns about the twin method). In studies such as that of Hong et al based only on first-degree relatives, we suggest that it would be advisable to use a more generic term such as transmissibility or familiality rather than the more specific term heritability.

Footnotes

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

References

  • 1.Hong LE, Summerfelt A, Mitchell BD, McMahon RP, Wonodi I, Buchanan RW, Thaker GK. Sensory gating endophenotype based on its neural oscillatory pattern and heritability estimate. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(9):1008–1016. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.9.1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Almasy L, Blangero J. Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(5):1198–1211. doi: 10.1086/301844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kendler KS, Prescott CA. Genes, Environment, and Psychopathology: Understanding the Causes of Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders. 1. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES