Skip to main content
Annals of the American Thoracic Society logoLink to Annals of the American Thoracic Society
. 2014 Mar;11(3):351–359. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201306-194OC

The Role of Molecular Genetic Analysis in the Diagnosis of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

Raymond H Kim 1,2, David A Hall 3,4, Ernest Cutz 5,6, Michael R Knowles 7, Kathleen A Nelligan 8, Keith Nykamp 9, Maimoona A Zariwala 10, Sharon D Dell 2,8,11,
PMCID: PMC4028737  PMID: 24498942

Abstract

Rationale: Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder of motile cilia. The diagnosis of PCD has previously relied on ciliary analysis with transmission electron microscopy or video microscopy. However, patients with PCD may have normal ultrastructural appearance, and ciliary analysis has limited accessibility. Alternatively, PCD can be diagnosed by demonstrating biallelic mutations in known PCD genes. Genetic testing is emerging as a diagnostic tool to complement ciliary analysis where interpretation and access may delay diagnosis.

Objectives: To determine the diagnostic yield of genetic testing of patients with a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of PCD in a multiethnic urban center.

Methods: Twenty-eight individuals with confirmed PCD on transmission electron microscopy of ciliary ultrastructure and 24 individuals with a probable diagnosis of PCD based on a classical PCD phenotype and low nasal nitric oxide had molecular analysis of 12 genes associated with PCD.

Results: Of 49 subjects who underwent ciliary biopsy, 28 (57%) were diagnosed with PCD through an ultrastructural defect. Of the 52 individuals who underwent molecular genetic analysis, 22 (42%) individuals had two mutations in known PCD genes. Twenty-four previously unreported mutations in known PCD genes were observed. Combining both diagnostic modalities of biopsy and molecular genetics, the diagnostic yield increased to 69% compared with 57% based on biopsy alone.

Conclusions: The diagnosis of PCD is challenging and has traditionally relied on ciliary biopsy, which is unreliable as the sole criterion for a definitive diagnosis. Molecular genetic analysis can be used as a complementary test to increase the diagnostic yield.

Keywords: primary ciliary dyskinesia, genetic analysis, diagnostic testing


Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a genetically heterogeneous autosomal recessive disease of motile cilia with an incidence of approximately 1/16,000 live births. Clinical manifestations include chronic bronchitis, neonatal respiratory distress, bronchiectasis, sinusitis, otitis media, situs inversus, and male infertility (1). The differential diagnosis of PCD includes respiratory disease, such as cystic fibrosis, asthma, and interstitial lung disease, and other system diseases, such as gastroesophageal reflux, immunodeficiency, and allergic rhinitis, often delaying the diagnosis, especially in the absence of situs inversus (2).

The diagnosis of PCD combines clinical characteristics, diagnostic investigations, and pathology. However, due to its clinical variability and limitations of current testing modalities, the diagnosis of PCD is often uncertain (3). The gold standard for PCD diagnosis traditionally has been transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of ciliary biopsy showing a ciliary ultrastructural defect (1). Analysis of ciliary beat pattern using video microscopy has also been shown to be helpful in the diagnosis of PCD (1, 2). However, ciliary biopsy poses the problems of being uncomfortable, being available only in a very limited number of tertiary care hospitals, and having a significant false-negative and false-positive rate (4).

A number of research tests, including nasal nitric oxide and radioactive mucociliary clearance studies, help to phenotype patients who have nondiagnostic ciliary pathology (1, 2). However, these specialized diagnostic tests are not offered in most institutions and are not reliable in preschool children, limiting their usefulness for early diagnosis. A major limitation for the understanding of PCD is the lack of a definitive diagnosis in many individuals with a PCD phenotype. With the ongoing discovery of genes associated with PCD, molecular genetic analysis is emerging as an accessible and standardized diagnostic test where more than 50% of PCD patients possess two disease-causing mutations in trans (1). Furthermore, genetic testing allows for carrier testing, prenatal testing, and genetic counseling. However, the role and cost-effectiveness of genetic testing in the diagnosis of PCD has yet to be fully evaluated (3).

Motile cilia are composed of nine peripheral microtubule doublets surrounding a central microtubular pair (“9+2” arrangement) along with microtubular-associated proteins, such as inner dynein arms (IDA), outer dynein arms (ODA), radial spokes, and nexin links (1). There are currently 24 genes identified in nonsyndromic PCD, and each is associated with a specific ciliary ultrastructural defect. ODA defects are observed in the majority of patients with PCD (5), and mutations in seven genes (DNAH5, DNAI1, DNAI2, DNAL1, TXNDC3, CCDC114, and ARMC4) have been identified in such patients (613). Mutations in LRRC50/DNAAF1, KTU/DNAAF2, DNAAF3, CCDC103, HEATR2, LRRC6, ZMYND10, and DYX1C1 cause both ODA and IDA defects (1422). Central microtubular pair (CP) abnormalities are seen with mutations in RSPH4A, RSPH9, and RSPH1 (23, 24). Radial spoke defects associated with CCDC39 and CCDC40 have been further characterized to involve IDA and nexin-links (nexin regulatory complexes) (2527). However, normal cilia or very subtle ciliary ultrastructural abnormalities are observed in patients with mutations in four genes associated with PCD: DNAH11, HYDIN, CCDC 164, and CCDC65 (2831). Furthermore, not all ciliary specimens are adequate for TEM, making the diagnosis of PCD solely on the basis of TEM difficult (4, 5).

At the start of our study, 12 genes were known to be involved in PCD and were being offered for clinical molecular genetic analysis. Due to the challenges in the diagnosis of PCD, we undertook a study to compare the diagnostic yield of molecular genetic analysis with that of other diagnostic tools, including ciliary biopsy.

Methods

Patients

Inclusion criteria for this study were patients who have either (1) definite PCD based on clinical phenotype plus a recognized ciliary ultrastructural defect, or (2) probable PCD based on the clinical phenotype and a low nasal nitric oxide (<100 nl/min) in patients 5 years and older who were able to perform this test reliably using the standard technique of exhalation against a resister (32). The empirical cut point of 100 nl/min was based on the largest previously published case series of patients with PCD and published normative values (33, 34). For patients who were given a clinical diagnosis of PCD with an inconclusive biopsy under the age of 5 years, only those who were able to reliably perform nasal nitric oxide testing at a later age and met our inclusion criteria were included in our study sample to avoid diagnostic misclassification that may result from indiscriminate nasal nitric oxide levels in children younger than age 5 years (35). The patients were evaluated at the Hospital for Sick Children (n = 42) and St Michael’s Hospital in Toronto (n = 10). A retrospective chart review was conducted, and collected data elements included personal and family medical history, diagnostic investigations, nasal nitric oxide, the results of the TEM analysis of the biopsies of cilia, and clinical genetic testing.

Mutation Profiling and Analysis

All patients enrolled in this study had clinical genetic testing conducted on 12 genes, mutations that have been implicated in PCD. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and analyzed at Prevention Genetics, Wisconsin in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–approved laboratory. Bidirectional Sanger Sequencing was conducted interrogating all coding exons of each gene, plus 50 base pairs of flanking noncoding DNA on either side of each exon. Genes were tested in a sequential fashion until one mutation was identified. If a second pathogenic mutation was not identified, the next gene in the panel was sequenced. For individuals with no mutation identified, all 12 genes were tested. Genes were analyzed in the following order, DNAH5 (RefSeq: NM_001369.2), DNAI1 (RefSeq: NM_012144.2), CCDC39 (RefSeq: NM_181426.1), CCDC40 (RefSeq: NM_017950.2), DNAI2 (RefSeq: NM_023036.4), DNAH11 (RefSeq: NM_003777.3), RSPH9 (RefSeq: NM_152732.4), RSPH4A (RefSeq: NM_001010892.2), KTU/DNAAF2 (RefSeq: NM_018139.2), LRRC50/DNAAF1 (RefSeq: NM_178452.4), TXNDC3 (RefSeq: NM_016616.4), and DNAL1 (RefSeq: NM_031427.3). Prioritization was based on previous reports of mutation frequency for each gene (1). For example, DNAH5 is reported to be the most frequently mutated gene (15–21%), followed by DNAI1 (2–9%), CCDC39 (2–10%), and CCDC40 (1–8%) (1). DNAI2 is reportedly mutated in approximately 2 to 4% of patients with PCD, and DNAH11 is found in approximately 6%. However, DNAI2 is a much smaller gene and less costly to sequence than DNAH11; therefore, DNAI2 was tested before DNAH11, with the goal of reducing overall sequencing costs. At the time of design, very little mutation frequency information was available for the remaining genes. As a result, these were ordered based on gene size, from smallest to largest, again to help reduce the costs of sequencing.

If a variant of unknown significance (VUS) was encountered, the ordering clinician would examine the VUS very carefully and assess its pathogenicity before proceeding with the next gene for testing. A variety of criteria were used to predict the pathogenicity of the variant. A variant would be considered disease causing if it was found in conjunction with a mutation in the same gene and predicted to be deleterious through three protein prediction programs: SIFT, PolyPhen-2, and MutationTaster (3638).

Results of genetic mutation testing were categorized into homozygote (two identical pathogenic mutations on a single PCD gene), compound heterozygote (two different pathogenic mutations on a single PCD gene), heterozygote (one pathogenic mutation on a PCD gene), or no mutations. Having two pathogenic mutations in a single PCD gene (either homozygote or heterozygote) was considered diagnostic for PCD.

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Boards of the Hospital for Sick Children and St Michael’s Hospital.

Results

Clinical Phenotype

A total of 52 patients from 45 families with probable or definite PCD were enrolled in the study. Twenty-six were male (50%) and 26 were female (50%), with an age range of 12 months to 55 years. Thirty-eight families had only one member affected, and seven families had two individuals affected. The predominant ethnicities were white (50%) and Pakistani (29%), and parental consanguinity was present in 15 (33%) families. Situs solitus was present in 28 individuals (53%), whereas 21 (40%) had situs inversus, and 3 had situs ambiguous. The majority of patients experienced neonatal respiratory distress (85%), otitis media (75%), bronchiectasis (75%), and sinusitis (94%).

Ultrastructural Analysis of Cilia

Forty-nine patients had a ciliary biopsy at our center and were tested for ultrastructural defects by TEM using a qualitative and quantitative approach as previously described (5). Twenty-eight (57%) patients had clear ciliary defects, six (12%) had inconclusive findings, six (12%) samples had an inadequate number of ciliated cells for TEM analysis, nine (18%) samples had no apparent defect, and three individuals refused to have biopsy. Of the 28 individuals with confirmed ciliary defects, 13 had isolated ODA defects, 6 had IDA+CP defects, and 9 had combined ODA+IDA defects.

Mutation Profile

Patients with confirmed ciliary defects and positive genetic results

Eighteen patients (64%) from 15 families with confirmed ciliary defects were found to have at least one mutation (Table 1). In these patients, DNAH5 was the most commonly mutated gene, found in eight families (53%), followed by CCDC40 and CCDC39 found in two families (13%) each, and DNAI2 and DNAAF2/KTU in one family (6%) each. Consistent with previous reports, all patients with DNAH5 or DNAAF2/KTU mutations had isolated ODA defects or combined ODA+IDA defects (19, 39, 40). Individual 23 was found to have a novel nonsense mutation, c.10508G>A (p.Trp3503*) and a second mutation, c.10616G>A (p.Arg3539His), which is similar to a previously documented mutation, p.Arg3539Cys in a family with PCD, which is believed to be involved in a critical microtubule binding site in DNAH5 (41), and we conclude this mutation to be disease causing. Individual 31 was found to have a novel nonsense mutation, c.9095C>G (p.Ser3032*) and a second missense mutation, c.11437C>T (p.Arg3138Trp), which is listed in dbSNP (rs140948494) with a minor allele frequency less than 0.1% (www.1000genomes.org). The Arg3138 amino acid is conserved among primate, chicken, frog, and fruit fly DNAH5 orthologs, and the Arg to Trp change is predicted to be deleterious (3638). Given this allele’s rarity and amino acid change, we conclude it to be disease causing.

Table 1.

Patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia with confirmed ciliary defects and positive molecular genetic results

Family Patient Ethnicity Sex Age at Dx Consanguineous Situs Status Neo RDE Otitis Media Bxsis Sinusitis Ciliary Defects nNO Gene Base Changes Predicted Effect No. Genes Tested
Homozygous
                           
 100 6 Pakistani M 2 yr Y S + + + + ODA+IDA 23.7 DNAI2 c.739C>T p.Arg247* 5
 101 13 Italian F 9 yr N S + + + ODA+IDA 10.2 DNAAF2 c.31delG p.Glu11Argfs*5 9
 102 29 Afghanistani F 14 yr Y I + + + + ODA 13.1 DNAH5 c.9460_9461insGTTTTTCT p. Asp3154Glyfs*23 1
 103 27 White F 2 mo N I + + + + IDA+CP 6.8 CCDC39 c.830_831delCA p.Thr277Argfs*3 3
 104 22 Pakistani F 4 yr Y S + + IDA+CP 5.6 CCDC40 c.1416delG p.Ile473Phefs*2 4
 104 34 Pakistani F 3 yr Y S + + + + IDA+CP 0.4 CCDC40 c.1416delG p.Ile473Phefs*2 4
Compound heterozygous
                       
 105 5 White M 10 mo N I + + IDA+CP 7.4 CCDC40 c.939+1G>C Splicing 4
                            c.3097A>T p.Lys1033*  
 106 7 White M 3 yr N S + + + + IDA+CP 6.5 CCDC39 c.830_831delCA p.Thr277Argfs*3 3
                            c.1795C>T p.Arg599*  
 107 28 White M 2.5 mo N I + + ODA ND DNAH5 c.10815delT (39) p.Pro3606Hisfs*23 1
                            c.11571-1G>A Splicing  
 108 23 Pakistani M 10 mo N S + + ODA 9.7 DNAH5 c.10508G>A p.Trp3503* 1
                            c.10616G>A p.Arg3539His  
 109 31 White M 7 yr N S + + + + ODA 140.5 DNAH5 c.9095C>G p.Ser3032* 1
                            c.11437C>T p.Arg3813Trp  
 127 3 East Indian F 16 yr N S + + ODA 13.8 DNAH5 c.6086delG p.Gly2029Valfs*25 1
                            c.9286C>T p.Arg3096*  
 127 33 East Indian F 14 yr N S + + + ODA 17.7 DNAH5 c.6086delG p.Gly2029Valfs*25 1
                            c.9286C>T p.Arg3096*  
 144 54 White M 11 mo N I + + + ODA 18.9 DNAH5 c.10384C>T (42) p.Gln3462* 1
                            c.13338+5G>A (39) Splicing  
Heterozygous
                       
 111 4 White M 4 yr N I + + + + ODA 8.1 DNAH5 c.13486C>T (39) p.Arg4496* 12
 112 32 Aboriginal F 11 yr N A + + + ODA 25.6 DNAH5 c.9449delG p.Gly3150Alafs*24 12
 113 12 Portuguese F 6 yr N A + + + + ODA 22 DNAH5 c.4237C>T p.Gln1413* 12
 113 36 Portuguese M 14 yr N S + + + + ODA 8.9 DNAH5 c.4237C>T p.Gln1413* 12

Definition of abbreviations: A = situs ambiguous; Bxsis = bronchiectasis; CP = central pair; F = female; I = situs inversus; IDA = inner dynein arms; M = male; N = no; Neo RDE = neonatal respiratory distress; nNo = nasal nitric oxide in nl/min; ODA = outer dynein arms; S = situs solitus; Y = yes.

Molecular genetic analysis was conducted on the following genes: DNAH5, DNAI1, CCDC39, CCDC40, DNAI2, DNAH11, RSPH9, RSPH4A, DNAAF1, DNAAF2, TXNDC3, DNAL1. Documented mutations are indicated in boldface.

Interestingly, family 127 had initial interpretation of the biopsy as apparently normal in individual 3 and inconclusive in individual 33. Given the molecular findings of two mutations in DNAH5, this prompted a review of both individuals (3, 33) and showed a classic ciliary defect with shortened stubby ODAs in both individuals.

Also consistent with the literature, patients with mutations in CCDC39 and CCDC40 had IDA+CP defects (patients 5, 7, 22, 27, 34), without any apparent ODA defects (26, 27). In four patients, only a single heterozygous pathogenic mutation in the DNAH5 was detected. Individual 12 had a biopsy initially reported as inconclusive; however, when reviewed with the molecular findings, the patient was found to have a decreased number of ODA. In total, 17 novel mutations were found in the 15 families analyzed, along with 4 previously described mutations (39, 42).

Patients with nondiagnostic ciliary biopsies and positive genetic results

Nine (38%) of the patients with nondiagnostic biopsies had at least one expected pathogenic mutation (Table 2). Three patients, all with positive parental consanguinity, were found to have homozygous mutations, of whom patient 11 was found to have an undocumented missense variant (p.Leu2488Pro) in DNAH5. The Leu2488 amino acid is conserved among primate, chicken, frog, and fruit fly DNAH5 orthologs; the Leu to Pro change is predicted to be deleterious, and we conclude it to be disease causing (3638). In addition, this patient also had an undocumented heterozygous missense variant (Arg121Cys; see Table E1 in the online supplement) in DNAAF1/LRRC50 that is predicted to be benign.

Table 2.

Patients with probable primary ciliary dyskinesia with nondiagnostic biopsies and positive molecular genetic results

Family Patient Ethnicity Sex Age at Dx Consanguineous Situs Status Neo RDE Otitis Media Bxsis Sinusitis Ciliary EM nNO Gene Base Changes Predicted Effect # Genes Tested
Homozygous
                           
 122 >11 Pakistani F 1.5 mo Y I + + + + Not done >23.5 DNAH5 c.7463T>C p.Leu2488Pro >12
 123 >47 Sri Lankan Tamil M 53 yr Y I + + + Inadequate >3.1 DNAI1 c.1188delC p.Tyr397Thrfs*5 >2
 124 >52 Jordanian F 1 mo Y I + + + Inadequate >7.2 DNAH11 c.4348C>T (28) p.Arg1450* >6
Compound heterozygous
                       
 125 >10 White F 6 yr N I + + + Inadequate >5.6 DNAH5 c.3037_3040delAGCG p.Val1014Leufs*20 >1
                            c.10815delT (39) p.Pro3606Hisfs*23  
 126 >8 White M 0 mo N I + + + Inconclusive >9.7 DNAH5 c.13458dupT (39) p.Asn4487* >12
                            c.11308A>G p.Ser3770Gly  
 128 >41 Pakistani F 2 yr N I + + + Normal >22 DNAH11 c.2569C>T (28) p.Arg857* >6
                            c.4471_4473delCTAinsAT p.Leu1491Ilefs*11  
 129 >42 Pakistani M 10 yr Y A + + + Normal >7.3 DNAH11 c.12365T>G p.Ile4122Ser >12
                            c.12888T>A p.Cys4296*  
 129 >43 Pakistani F 3 yr Y I Normal >5.1 DNAH11 c.12365T>G p.Ile4122Ser >12
                            c.12888T>A p.Cys4296*  
Heterozygous
                       
 130 >40 White M 5 yr N S + + + + Normal >9.8 DNAH11 c.8719C>T (43) p.Arg2907* >12

Definition of abbreviations: A = situs ambiguous; Bxsis = bronchiectasis; EM = electron microscopy; F = female; I = situs inversus; inadequate = inadequate ciliated cells to analyze; inconclusive = adequate sample, inconclusive transmission electron microscopy; M = male; N = no; ND = not done; Neo RDE = neonatal respiratory distress; nNo = nasal nitric oxide in nl/min; S = situs solitus; Y = yes.

Molecular genetic analysis was conducted on the following genes: DNAH5, DNAI1, CCDC39, CCDC40, DNAI2, DNAH11, RSPH9, RSPH4A, DNAAF1, DNAAF2, TXNDC3, DNAL1. Documented mutations are indicated in boldface.

Five patients from four different families were found to be compound heterozygotes. Two families, (128, 129) had affected individuals with a normal ciliary biopsy and two mutations in DNAH11, which is consistent with the literature (28). Of these, family 129 had one premature truncating mutation in DNAH11 and a novel missense p.Ile4122Ser variant. Ile4122 is a well-conserved amino acid; this change is predicted to be deleterious, and we conclude this mutation to be disease causing (3638). Similarly, individual 8 had one premature chain termination codon in DNAH5 and a novel missense p.Ser3770Gly variant, which is also predicted to be pathogenic, and we conclude it to be disease causing (3638). In total, seven novel mutations were found in the eight families, along with five previously reported mutations (28, 39, 43).

Patients with negative or inconclusive genetic results

Ten patients (40%) with confirmed ciliary defects did not have any detectable mutations in any of the genes tested (Table 3). Several rare and previously undocumented variants were identified in these patients (Table E1).

Table 3.

Patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia with inconclusive molecular genetic results

Family Patient Ethnicity Sex Age at Dx Consanguineous Situs Status Neo RDE Otitis Media Bxsis Sinusitis Ciliary EM nNO
Confirmed ciliary defect
 110 >15 Pakistani F 8 yr Y S + + + + ODA+IDA >10.8
 114 >9 White M 4 yr N S + + + + ODA >13.4
 115 >26 East Indian M 9 yr N S + + + + ODA+IDA >5.8
 116 >16 Pakistani F 15 yr Y S + + + ODA >28.9
 117 >17 Somali M 14 yr Y I + + ODA+IDA >107.2
 117 >19 Somali M 1 yr Y I + + + ODA+IDA >8.8
 118 >35 Pakistani F 2 mo Y S + + + + ODA+IDA >23.4
 119 >18 White F 11 yr N S + + + + ODA+IDA >1.0
 120 >24 White M 2 mo N I + + + ODA+IDA >11.2
 121 >30 Portuguese M 9 yr N S + + + + IDA+CP >15.3
Unconfirmed ciliary defect
 132 >21 White M 6 yr N I + + + + Normal >4.9
 133 >25 White M 5 yr N S + + + + Normal >13.8
 134 >38 Hispanic M 15 yr N S + + + Normal >17
 136 >44 Portuguese M 8 yr N S + + + + Normal >20.1
 138 >46 White F 35 yr N S + + + + Normal >53.2
 131 >20 White M 2 yr N I + + + + Inconclusive >99.2
 139 >48 Pakistani F 33 yr Y S + + + + Inconclusive >56.2
 141 >50 Pakistani F 5 yr N I + + + + Inconclusive >17.1
 142 >51 Sri Lankan Tamil F 18 yr N S + + + Inconclusive >14.5
 143 >53 White F 20 yr Y S + + + Inconclusive >18.4
 135 >39 Pakistani F 12 yr Y S + + + + Inadequate >22.1
 137 >45 Hispanic F 30 yr N S + + + Inadequate >17.1
 115 >14 East Indian M 7 yr N S + + + + Inadequate >37.5
 118 >37 Pakistani M 1 yr Y I + + + + Not done >36.5
 140 >49 Portuguese F 18 yr Y I ? + + Not done >6.9

Definition of abbreviations: A = situs ambiguous; Bxsis = bronchiectasis; CP = central pair; EM = electron microscopy; F = female; I = situs inversus; IDA = inner dynein arms; inadequate = inadequate ciliated cells to analyze; inconclusive = adequate sample, inconclusive transmission electron microscopy; M = male; N = no; ND = not done; Neo RDE = neonatal respiratory distress; nNo = nasal nitric oxide in nl/min; ODA = outer dynein arms; S = situs solitus; Y = yes.

Molecular genetic analysis was conducted on the following genes: DNAH5, DNAI1, CCDC39, CCDC40, DNAI2, DNAH11, RSPH9, RSPH4A, DNAAF1, DNAAF2, TXNDC3, DNAL1.

In 15 patients with nondiagnostic ciliary biopsies, no disease-causing genetic mutations were found. Two patients (14, 37) without a confirmatory biopsy had affected siblings (patients 26 and 35, respectively), both with combined ODA+IDA defects. Thus, the suspicion of PCD in these two patients is very high, even without confirmation by ciliary biopsy or molecular testing. Of the remaining 13 patients, 5 had normal biopsies, 5 were inconclusive, 2 were inadequate, and 1 refused biopsy. Based on their constellation of clinical findings and low nasal nitric oxide, these individuals were considered to be probable PCD, although not confirmed on TEM or molecular testing.

Diagnostic Yield

The diagnostic yield of ciliary biopsy alone was 57% (28 of 49) (Tables 4 and 5). Although 27 of 52 (52%) individuals had at least one allele harboring mutation in the 12 PCD genes tested, only 22 of 52 (42%) had two pathogenic mutations to confirm the genetic diagnosis of PCD. In total, 36 individuals were diagnosed with PCD. Fourteen were diagnosed through biopsy alone, 8 with positive molecular results, and 14 had both diagnostic biopsies and two disease-causing mutations. Overall, in this population, adding clinically available molecular genetic testing increased the diagnostic sensitivity to 69% (36 of 52) compared with 57% based on biopsy alone.

Table 4.

Categorization of patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia based on diagnostic modality

  Diagnostic Ciliary Biopsy Noncontributory Ciliary Biopsy Totals
Diagnostic molecular genetics* >14 >8 >22
Nondiagnostic molecular genetics >14 >16 >30
Total >28 >24 >52

Molecular genetic analysis was conducted on the following genes: DNAH5, DNAI1, CCDC39, CCDC40, DNAI2, DNAH11, RSPH9, RSPH4A, DNAAF1, DNAAF2, TXNDC3, DNAL1.

*

Includes biopsies that were normal, inconclusive, inadequate, or not done.

Two pathogenic mutations in a single primary ciliary dyskinesia gene.

Table 5.

Categorization of genetic mutation zygosity based on ciliary biopsy results in 52 patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia

  Homozygote Compound Heterozygote Heterozygote No Mutations
Diagnostic ciliary biopsy >6 >8 >4 >10
Noncontributory ciliary biopsy* >3 >5 >1 >15
Total >9 >13 >5 >25

Molecular genetic analysis was conducted on the following genes: DNAH5, DNAI1, CCDC39, CCDC40, DNAI2, DNAH11, RSPH9, RSPH4A, DNAAF1, DNAAF2, TXNDC3, DNAL1.

*

Includes biopsies that were normal, inconclusive, inadequate, or not done.

Discussion

The diagnosis of PCD is challenging and currently relies on clinical features and ciliary analysis. This is, to our knowledge, the first study to assess and compare the diagnostic usefulness of molecular genetic analysis in a clinical setting. Historically, patients have been diagnosed with PCD based on TEM of ciliary tissue. However, the diagnostic yield of such studies is reported between 20 and 39% (4, 5), and many individuals refuse to have such an invasive procedure. In our study, a slightly higher diagnostic yield of 57% was observed, which may be a reflection of a different patient selection process for biopsy in our respective centers. In addition, inconclusive biopsies were observed in six individuals (12% of biopsy samples), which is consistent with the 11 to 22% reported previously (4, 5). The individuals with inconclusive and inadequate biopsies were offered repeat biopsy; however, the majority refused. Two individuals (21, 50) who did agree to repeat nasal scraping had inconclusive biopsies on their repeat samples. This is a reflection of the limitations of the overall diagnostic usefulness of biopsy outside of the setting of a clinical trial.

The diagnosis of PCD based on ciliary biopsy alone is further complicated as individuals with PCD and DNAH11, HYDIN, CCDC164, and CCDC65 mutations have normal-appearing ciliary ultrastructure by TEM (2831). Furthermore, some ultrastructural defects, such as IDA and radial spoke defects, were found to be false positives, having normal TEM and beat pattern analysis on repeat biopsy (44).

Genetic testing overcomes technical limitations of ciliary analysis and has been believed to increase the diagnostic yield in patients with suspected PCD; however, despite its convenience and availability, it is not used routinely in clinical practice (3). Of the 52 patients who underwent genetic testing using the PCD panel of 12 genes, 22 individuals were found to have two mutations in known genes associated with PCD. Eight of these individuals had nondiagnostic biopsies (not done, inadequate, inconclusive, or normal), providing an additional diagnostic yield of 12% compared with biopsy alone. Together, genetic testing in conjunction with ciliary biopsy provides an overall diagnostic rate of 69% for patients suspected of having PCD. Furthermore, a molecular genetic result offers carrier testing, prenatal testing, and genetic counseling, which are not possible with a pathologic diagnosis.

Ultrastructural analysis of cilia is challenging, and TEM is prone to false-positive and -negative results (4, 5). Our studies used standard operating protocols, and independent reviewers examined samples. Unfortunately, such procedures are not routine in most nonacademic settings, particularly in nonpediatric hospitals, and depending on the electron microscopist’s familiarity with PCD abnormalities, including sample preparation and analysis, results may be variable. Here, we demonstrate that the molecular findings in patients can result in review of the cilia ultrastructure and can contribute to the pathologic interpretation of the ciliary ultrastructure.

In addition, we document 24 previously unreported genetic variants in various genes (Table E2), of which five were classified as disease causing based on their effects on protein structure and the presence of another pathogenic mutation. A total of 42% of our patients were found to have two mutations in a PCD gene, which is similar to that reported in the literature (1).

Despite providing additional diagnostic information on patients with two clearly pathogenic mutations, molecular testing conducted here may also require careful interpretation and potentially further testing. For example, in those individuals with only one mutation detected, it is difficult to definitively conclude pathogenicity. Considering all five were chain termination mutations, it is likely these are the genes responsible for PCD in these patients. Furthermore, the biopsy results are congruent with the molecular results, which can help guide further molecular testing options. Because all coding exons and intron/exon boundaries were sequenced, additional studies, such as deletion/duplication testing and mRNA sequencing, will be necessary to identify a possible second pathogenic allele and to confirm that these mutations are causing PCD in these patients. In vitro ciliary beat frequency analysis would also be helpful in determining the pathogenicity of these cases. Alternatively, in some cases, biallelic mutations in another gene that is not tested may be responsible for the PCD phenotype.

Furthermore, the genetics of PCD are not fully elucidated, as highlighted in individual 50, who had one previously documented predicted pathogenic VUS (Table E1), c.520G>A in DNAI1 (40), and a common TXNDC3 intronic variant, c.271–27 C>T, previously documented in a family with PCD (6). A second mutation was not found in these two genes or in the rest of the 10 PCD genes offered on the panel. We can speculate that this individual had two mutations on different genes; however, digenic inheritance has not previously been reported in PCD, and it is difficult to ascertain if that is the case for this patient. Another possibility is that this individual carries a large deletion as the second mutated allele or biallelic mutations in another locus involved in PCD.

As more than one-third of individuals with well-characterized PCD do not have a mutation in associated PCD loci, molecular genetic analysis may not provide a diagnosis in all cases. In 25 individuals in our study, genetic testing was not helpful, in that testing 12 known genes resulted in finding no mutations. This is a significant portion (48%) of the population tested. These individuals may possess a mutation not detectable using the current molecular assay and may benefit from testing the 12 other PCD-associated genes or gene-discovery experiments. Due to the lag of newly discovered PCD genes being clinically available, our study may be underpowered in terms of gene coverage. We expect with the ongoing discovery of new PCD loci that the proportion of individuals with unknown PCD loci will decrease, increasing the diagnostic contribution of molecular genetic analysis.

There are a variety of limitations of this current study. For a recessively inherited disease such as PCD, a clear genetic diagnosis requires two pathogenic mutations on opposite chromosomes. However, because parents have not been tested, we cannot rule out the possibility that both mutations are in cis for compound heterozygotes or that a large intergenic deletion is present in homozygotes (Table 5). Given the clinical history of the patients in this study, and the fact that nearly all heterozygous mutations are predicted strong loss of function (i.e., frameshift, nonsense, splicing), we presume patients with both mutations on the same chromosome will be a minority. Likewise, we expect individuals with a large deletion covering a pathogenic mutation to be a minority, because all but two (13, 27) are reported to be from consanguineous parents. Nevertheless, parental studies are currently underway.

Here, we describe a multiethnic cohort of 52 patients with a suspected diagnosis of PCD based on clinical history and diagnostic investigations who subsequently underwent molecular genetic analysis. Importantly, eight individuals, whose diagnosis was not obtained through a biopsy of cilia, were found to have two mutations in associated PCD genes, increasing the combined diagnostic yield with genetic testing to 69%. Based on these results, we suggest genetic testing be conducted on all individuals with a suspected diagnosis of PCD in conjunction with ciliary biopsy to maximize the diagnostic accuracy. As not all the genes associated with PCD are known, molecular genetic analysis should not be considered the sole diagnostic modality. However, genetic testing can be used as a convenient initial test for individuals in whom the clinical suspicion for PCD is very high and access to ciliary biopsy is limited. In addition, positive molecular findings have the added advantage of giving the family useful genetic information for future prenatal diagnosis and carrier testing studies. Importantly, the diagnostic yield of molecular analysis for PCD is predicted to increase greatly as new PCD genes are discovered and added to clinical sequencing panels. As the diagnostic yield increases and the cost of DNA sequencing continues to drop, molecular analysis for highly heterogeneous genetic diseases such as PCD is expected to become an invaluable and indispensable tool for clinicians.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Natasha Jivraj, Eriskay Liston, Shaidah Deghan Manshadi, Melody Miki, Donna Wilkes, Jennifer Welsh, and Peter Bikangaga for patient recruitment and organizing molecular analysis. They also thank the patients with PCD and their family members for their participation and support; the investigators and coordinators of the Genetic Disorders of Mucociliary Clearance Consortium, which is part of the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network; and Dr Margaret Leigh, Susan Minnix, and Whitney Wolf (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) for their continued support.

Footnotes

Supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grant 5 U54 HL096458-06 (S.D.D., M.A.Z., M.R.K.), funded by the Office of the Director, and supported by Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR) and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); and NIH–NHLBI grant 5R01HL071798 (M.R.K., M.A.Z.). In addition, this publication was made possible by grants from the ORDR and NHLBI, components of the NIH. The Genetic Disorders of Mucociliary Clearance Consortium (U54HL096458) is a part of the NIH Rare Disease Clinical Research Network, supported through collaboration between the NIH ORDR at the National Center for Advancing Translational Science and the NHLBI.

This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue’s table of contents at www.atsjournals.org

Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.

References

  • 1.Zariwala MA, Knowles MR, Leigh MW.Primary ciliary dyskinesia. 2007. Jan 24 [accessed 28 Feb 2013]. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Bird TD, et al GeneReviews [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle, 1993. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1122/ [PubMed]
  • 2.Leigh MW, Pittman JE, Carson JL, Ferkol TW, Dell SD, Davis SD, Knowles MR, Zariwala MA. Clinical and genetic aspects of primary ciliary dyskinesia/Kartagener syndrome. Genet Med. 2009;11:473–487. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181a53562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barbato A, Frischer T, Kuehni CE, Snijders D, Azevedo I, Baktai G, Bartoloni L, Eber E, Escribano A, Haarman E, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia: a consensus statement on diagnostic and treatment approaches in children. Eur Respir J. 2009;34:1264–1276. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00176608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Olin JT, Burns K, Carson JL, Metjian H, Atkinson JJ, Davis SD, Dell SD, Ferkol TW, Milla CE, Olivier KN, et al. for the Genetic Disorders of Mucociliary Clearance Consortium. Diagnostic yield of nasal scrape biopsies in primary ciliary dyskinesia: a multicenter experience. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011;46:483–488. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shoemark A, Dixon M, Corrin B, Dewar A. Twenty-year review of quantitative transmission electron microscopy for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:267–271. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Duriez B, Duquesnoy P, Escudier E, Bridoux AM, Escalier D, Rayet I, Marcos E, Vojtek AM, Bercher JF, Amselem S. A common variant in combination with a nonsense mutation in a member of the thioredoxin family causes primary ciliary dyskinesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:3336–3341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611405104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Knowles MR, Leigh MW, Ostrowski LE, Huang L, Carson JL, Hazucha MJ, Yin W, Berg JS, Davis SD, Dell SD, et al. Genetic Disorders of Mucociliary Clearance Consortium. Exome sequencing identifies mutations in CCDC114 as a cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;92:99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Loges NT, Olbrich H, Fenske L, Mussaffi H, Horvath J, Fliegauf M, Kuhl H, Baktai G, Peterffy E, Chodhari R, et al. DNAI2 mutations cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with defects in the outer dynein arm. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:547–558. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mazor M, Alkrinawi S, Chalifa-Caspi V, Manor E, Sheffield VC, Aviram M, Parvari R. Primary ciliary dyskinesia caused by homozygous mutation in DNAL1, encoding dynein light chain 1. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:599–607. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Olbrich H, Häffner K, Kispert A, Völkel A, Volz A, Sasmaz G, Reinhardt R, Hennig S, Lehrach H, Konietzko N, et al. Mutations in DNAH5 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia and randomization of left-right asymmetry. Nat Genet. 2002;30:143–144. doi: 10.1038/ng817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Onoufriadis A, Paff T, Antony D, Shoemark A, Micha D, Kuyt B, Schmidts M, Petridi S, Dankert-Roelse JE, Haarman EG, et al. UK10K. Splice-site mutations in the axonemal outer dynein arm docking complex gene CCDC114 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;92:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pennarun G, Escudier E, Chapelin C, Bridoux AM, Cacheux V, Roger G, Clément A, Goossens M, Amselem S, Duriez B. Loss-of-function mutations in a human gene related to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii dynein IC78 result in primary ciliary dyskinesia. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:1508–1519. doi: 10.1086/302683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hjeij R, Lindstrand A, Francis R, Zariwala MA, Liu X, Li Y, Damerla R, Dougherty GW, Abouhamed M, Olbrich H, et al. ARMC4 mutations cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with randomization of left/right body asymmetry. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:357–367. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Duquesnoy P, Escudier E, Vincensini L, Freshour J, Bridoux AM, Coste A, Deschildre A, de Blic J, Legendre M, Montantin G, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the human ortholog of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii ODA7 disrupt dynein arm assembly and cause primary ciliary dyskinesia. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85:890–896. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Horani A, Druley TE, Zariwala MA, Patel AC, Levinson BT, Van Arendonk LG, Thornton KC, Giacalone JC, Albee AJ, Wilson KS, et al. Whole-exome capture and sequencing identifies HEATR2 mutation as a cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91:685–693. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kott E, Duquesnoy P, Copin B, Legendre M, Dastot-Le Moal F, Montantin G, Jeanson L, Tamalet A, Papon JF, Siffroi JP, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in LRRC6, a gene essential for proper axonemal assembly of inner and outer dynein arms, cause primary ciliary dyskinesia. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91:958–964. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Loges NT, Olbrich H, Becker-Heck A, Häffner K, Heer A, Reinhard C, Schmidts M, Kispert A, Zariwala MA, Leigh MW, et al. Deletions and point mutations of LRRC50 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia due to dynein arm defects. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85:883–889. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mitchison HM, Schmidts M, Loges NT, Freshour J, Dritsoula A, Hirst RA, O’Callaghan C, Blau H, Al Dabbagh M, Olbrich H, et al. Mutations in axonemal dynein assembly factor DNAAF3 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia. Nat Genet. 2012;44:381–389, S1–S2. doi: 10.1038/ng.1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Omran H, Kobayashi D, Olbrich H, Tsukahara T, Loges NT, Hagiwara H, Zhang Q, Leblond G, O’Toole E, Hara C, et al. Ktu/PF13 is required for cytoplasmic pre-assembly of axonemal dyneins. Nature. 2008;456:611–616. doi: 10.1038/nature07471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Panizzi JR, Becker-Heck A, Castleman VH, Al-Mutairi DA, Liu Y, Loges NT, Pathak N, Austin-Tse C, Sheridan E, Schmidts M, et al. CCDC103 mutations cause primary ciliary dyskinesia by disrupting assembly of ciliary dynein arms. Nat Genet. 2012;44:714–719. doi: 10.1038/ng.2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zariwala MA, Gee HY, Kurkowiak M, Al-Mutairi DA, Leigh MW, Hurd TW, Hjeij R, Dell SD, Chaki M, Dougherty GW, et al. ZMYND10 is mutated in primary ciliary dyskinesia and interacts with LRRC6. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:336–345. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Moore DJ, Onoufriadis A, Shoemark A, Simpson MA, zur Lage PI, de Castro SC, Bartoloni L, Gallone G, Petridi S, Woollard WJ, et al. Mutations in ZMYND10, a gene essential for proper axonemal assembly of inner and outer dynein arms in humans and flies, cause primary ciliary dyskinesia. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:346–356. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Castleman VH, Romio L, Chodhari R, Hirst RA, de Castro SC, Parker KA, Ybot-Gonzalez P, Emes RD, Wilson SW, Wallis C, et al. Mutations in radial spoke head protein genes RSPH9 and RSPH4A cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with central-microtubular-pair abnormalities. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:197–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kott E, Legendre M, Copin B, Papon JF, Dastot-Le Moal F, Montantin G, Duquesnoy P, Piterboth W, Amram D, Bassinet L, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in RSPH1 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with central-complex and radial-spoke defects. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:561–570. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Antony D, Becker-Heck A, Zariwala MA, Schmidts M, Onoufriadis A, Forouhan M, Wilson R, Taylor-Cox T, Dewar A, Jackson C, et al. UK10K. Mutations in CCDC39 and CCDC40 are the major cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia with axonemal disorganization and absent inner dynein arms. Hum Mutat. 2013;34:462–472. doi: 10.1002/humu.22261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Becker-Heck A, Zohn IE, Okabe N, Pollock A, Lenhart KB, Sullivan-Brown J, McSheene J, Loges NT, Olbrich H, Haeffner K, et al. The coiled-coil domain containing protein CCDC40 is essential for motile cilia function and left-right axis formation. Nat Genet. 2011;43:79–84. doi: 10.1038/ng.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Merveille AC, Davis EE, Becker-Heck A, Legendre M, Amirav I, Bataille G, Belmont J, Beydon N, Billen F, Clément A, et al. CCDC39 is required for assembly of inner dynein arms and the dynein regulatory complex and for normal ciliary motility in humans and dogs. Nat Genet. 2011;43:72–78. doi: 10.1038/ng.726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Knowles MR, Leigh MW, Carson JL, Davis SD, Dell SD, Ferkol TW, Olivier KN, Sagel SD, Rosenfeld M, Burns KA, et al. Genetic Disorders of Mucociliary Clearance Consortium. Mutations of DNAH11 in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia with normal ciliary ultrastructure. Thorax. 2012;67:433–441. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Olbrich H, Schmidts M, Werner C, Onoufriadis A, Loges NT, Raidt J, Banki NF, Shoemark A, Burgoyne T, Al Turki S, et al. UK10K Consortium. Recessive HYDIN mutations cause primary ciliary dyskinesia without randomization of left-right body asymmetry. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91:672–684. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wirschell M, Olbrich H, Werner C, Tritschler D, Bower R, Sale WS, Loges NT, Pennekamp P, Lindberg S, Stenram U, et al. The nexin-dynein regulatory complex subunit DRC1 is essential for motile cilia function in algae and humans. Nat Genet. 2013;45:262–268. doi: 10.1038/ng.2533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Horani A, Brody SL, Ferkol TW, Shoseyov D, Wasserman MG, Ta-shma A, Wilson KS, Bayly PV, Amirav I, Cohen-Cymberknoh M, et al. CCDC65 mutation causes primary ciliary dyskinesia with normal ultrastructure and hyperkinetic cilia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e72299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.American Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide, 2005. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:912–930. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200406-710ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Struben VM, Wieringa MH, Mantingh CJ, Bommeljé C, Don M, Feenstra L, de Jongste JC. Nasal NO: normal values in children age 6 through to 17 years. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:453–457. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00015205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Noone PG, Leigh MW, Sannuti A, Minnix SL, Carson JL, Hazucha M, Zariwala MA, Knowles MR. Primary ciliary dyskinesia: diagnostic and phenotypic features. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:459–467. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200303-365OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Piacentini GL, Bodini A, Peroni D, Rigotti E, Pigozzi R, Pradal U, Boner AL. Nasal nitric oxide for early diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia: practical issues in children. Respir Med. 2008;102:541–547. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7:248–249. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1073–1081. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schwarz JM, Rödelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods. 2010;7:575–576. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0810-575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hornef N, Olbrich H, Horvath J, Zariwala MA, Fliegauf M, Loges NT, Wildhaber J, Noone PG, Kennedy M, Antonarakis SE, et al. DNAH5 mutations are a common cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia with outer dynein arm defects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:120–126. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200601-084OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Failly M, Saitta A, Muñoz A, Falconnet E, Rossier C, Santamaria F, de Santi MM, Lazor R, DeLozier-Blanchet CD, Bartoloni L, et al. DNAI1 mutations explain only 2% of primary ciliary dykinesia. Respiration. 2008;76:198–204. doi: 10.1159/000128567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Failly M, Bartoloni L, Letourneau A, Munoz A, Falconnet E, Rossier C, de Santi MM, Santamaria F, Sacco O, DeLozier-Blanchet CD, et al. Mutations in DNAH5 account for only 15% of a non-preselected cohort of patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia. J Med Genet. 2009;46:281–286. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.061176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Djakow J, Svobodová T, Hrach K, Uhlík J, Cinek O, Pohunek P. Effectiveness of sequencing selected exons of DNAH5 and DNAI1 in diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012;47:864–875. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lucas JS, Adam EC, Goggin PM, Jackson CL, Powles-Glover N, Patel SH, Humphreys J, Fray MD, Falconnet E, Blouin JL, et al. Static respiratory cilia associated with mutations in Dnahc11/DNAH11: a mouse model of PCD. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:495–503. doi: 10.1002/humu.22001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.O’Callaghan C, Rutman A, Williams GM, Hirst RA. Inner dynein arm defects causing primary ciliary dyskinesia: repeat testing required. Eur Respir J. 2011;38:603–607. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00108410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the American Thoracic Society are provided here courtesy of American Thoracic Society

RESOURCES