Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2010 Dec 1;8(1):37–46. doi: 10.3816/CGC.2010.n.006

Future Directions in Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer Therapy

Emmanuel S Antonarakis 1, Michael A Carducci 1
PMCID: PMC4029111  NIHMSID: NIHMS571688  PMID: 21208854

Abstract

Although several new therapies have recently become available for the treatment of castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), the disease remains universally incurable and demands novel therapeutic approaches. To this end, great strides have been made in our understanding of the biologic and molecular mechanisms driving prostate cancer growth and progression in the past few years, resulting in widespread clinical investigation of numerous new targeted therapies. This review will highlight some of the key therapeutic agents that (in the opinion of the authors) may have the largest effect on the future management of CRPC, with a focus on both molecular targets and clinical trial design. These agents include angiogenesis inhibitors, mTOR pathway inhibitors, apoptosis-inducing drugs, IGF pathway inhibitors, Src family inhibitors, Hedgehog pathway antagonists, epigenetic therapies, PARP inhibitors, and prodrug approaches. The future of CRPC therapy appears brighter than ever before.

Keywords: Clinical trials, CRPC, Drug development, Targeted therapy

Introduction

Castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is the lethal form of this disease, yet until recently, therapies that improved survival in this setting were limited. In the past several months, 2 new treatment options were added to the existing chemotherapy standard (ie, docetaxel) for patients with metastatic CRPC. One of these, the immunotherapy product sipuleucel-T, has been approved for use in men with minimally symptomatic metastatic CRPC and the other, the novel taxane cabazitaxel, is indicated for patients with disease progression following docetaxel administration. Encouragingly, a panoply of additional agents (eg, the hormonal drugs abiraterone and MDV-3100, the bone-targeted agent denosumab, and the immune checkpoint inhibitor ipilimumab) have made their way into pivotal phase III trials and may also add to the therapeutic arsenal in the near future. These therapies have created a dynamic shift in the previously static landscape of therapeutic possibilities for men with advanced prostate cancer. Still, CRPC remains incurable, and as a result, new druggable targets continue to be explored at an increasingly rapid pace. The pursuit of such novel targeted therapies likely represents the future of prostate cancer drug development.

The number of agents in various stages of clinical exploration for the treatment of CRPC is higher than ever before. This has been made possible by our accelerated understanding of the biologic and molecular mechanisms underpinning prostate cancer growth and spread, which has fueled an expansion of research on new therapeutic approaches. This review will highlight some novel targeted therapies that may be the wave of the future in the management of CRPC, focusing on mechanism of action and developmental status of some key clinical compounds that are currently in human clinical trials. Advances in chemotherapeutic approaches, hormonal manipulations, bone-targeting interventions, and immunotherapeutic strategies will not be discussed here, and will be highlighted by other authors in this issue.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors

Bevacizumab

Tumor angiogenesis is thought to be an important process in prostate cancer progression, and elevated plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been correlated with advanced clinical stage and decreased survival.1,2 Additionally, antibodies to VEGF slow prostate xenograft growth rates, especially when combined with chemotherapy.3,4 Encouraging results from several phase II studies combining the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab with docetaxel5,6 led to the conduct of a pivotal phase III trial (CALGB 90401) evaluating docetaxel plus either bevacizumab or placebo in 1050 men with metastatic CRPC. Disappointingly, although an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) was seen in the docetaxel-bevacizumab arm of this study (9.9 months vs. 7.5 months; P < .0001), this did not translate into an overall survival (OS) advantage (22.6 months vs. 21.5 months; P = .18).7 However, these results do not indicate that bevacizumab may never have a role in the treatment of CRPC. Future development of this agent may focus on combining it with other classes of angiogenesis inhibitors or other chemotherapeutic drugs whose toxicities do not overlap with those of bevacizumab. Alternatively, evaluation of serological angiogenic markers from men treated on the CALGB 90401 trial may uncover a subset of patients that derive a survival advantage with the addition of bevacizumab.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

A second approach has focused on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), agents that block angiogenic growth factor targets such as the VEGF receptor. In phase II studies involving men with metastatic CRPC, oral sorafenib was shown to prevent radiologic progression and even caused regression of bone metastases in some patients, but without inducing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) declines.8,9 Similarly, sunitinib produced some partial radiographic responses but had minimal effect on PSA levels in men with both chemotherapy-naive and docetaxel-pretreated CRPC.10,11 A definitive phase III study using single-agent sunitinib versus placebo in patients with docetaxel-refractory disease is now being conducted (Table 1). Finally, a novel multikinase inhibitor, vatalanib, is currently being tested in a phase II study in combination with docetaxel for patients with metastatic CRPC; radiologic responses rather than PSA declines have been chosen as the primary endpoint in this trial.

Table 1.

Selected Ongoing Clinical Trials of Drugs Targeting the Angiogenic and mTOR Pathways in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Target Drug Toxicities Dose Phase Summary of Trial Lead Site Identifier
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
VEGF receptor Sorafenib Fatigue, diarrhea, rash, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome 400 mg orally twice a day II Docetaxel + sorafenib for first-line metastatic CRPC University of Pennsylvania NCT00589420
Sunitinib Fatigue, diarrhea, rash, hypertension, nausea, leukopenia 37.5 mg orally daily (2 of 3 weeks) II Docetaxel + sunitinib for first-line metastatic CRPC MD Anderson Cancer Center NCT00137436
Fatigue, diarrhea, rash, hypertension, nausea, leukopenia 37.5 mg orally daily III Sunitinib versus placebo for second-line metastatic CRPC Global study NCT00676650
Vatalanib Nausea, hypertension, proteinuria, leukopenia transaminitis 1250 mg orally daily II Docetaxel + vatalanib for first-line metastatic CRPC University of California San Francisco NCT00293371
VEGF-Trap Aflibercept Fatigue, hypertension, proteinuria, headache, dysphonia, epistaxis 6 mg/kg I.V. every 3 weeks III Docetaxel ± aflibercept for first-line metastatic CRPC Global study NCT00519285
IMiDs Lenalidomide Fatigue, dizziness, rash, pruritus, diarrhea, cytopenias 25 mg orally daily (2 of 3 weeks) III Docetaxel ± lenalidomide for first-line metastatic CRPC Global study NCT00988208
PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway Inhibitors
mTOR Everolimus Rash, edema, glycemia, lipidemia, cytopenias, asthenia 10 mg orally daily II Docetaxel + everolimus for first-line metastatic CRPC Dana-Farber Cancer Institute NCT00459186
Temsirolimus Rash, edema, asthenia, cytopenia, transaminitis glycemia, lipidemia 25 mg I.V. every week II Temsirolimus + antiandrogen for second-line metastatic CRPC Duke University NCT00887640
Ridaforolimus Rash, fatigue, nausea, mucositis, transaminitis, glycemia, lipidemia 50 mg I.V. every week II Single-agent ridaforolimus for second-line metastatic CRPC Dana-Farber Cancer Institute NCT00110188
Akt MK2206 Rash, nausea, fatigue, hyperglycemia Dose escalation I Docetaxel + MK2206 for advanced refractory solid tumors Royal Marsden Hospital NCT00848718

Abbreviations: CRPC = castration-resistant prostate cancer; IMiDs = immunomodulatory drugs; I.V. = intravenous; mTOR = mammalian target of rapamycin; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor

Aflibercept

An alternative antiangiogenic strategy is to use VEGF decoy receptors (VEGF-Trap) to saturate circulating VEGF, preventing it from binding to its natural receptor. The lead agent in this class is aflibercept, a recombinant decoy fusion protein of VEGF receptors-1 and -2 and the Fc fragment of IgG1.12 In a phase I/II study of intravenous (I.V.) aflibercept combined with docetaxel in 54 heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors,13 the partial response (PR) rate was 9%, while 59% of patients demonstrated stable disease (SD). Toxicities of this combination included neutropenia, hypertension, proteinuria, epistaxis, and dysphonia. A multicenter, placebo-controlled phase III trial of docetaxel with or without aflibercept for men with metastatic CRPC is currently under way (Table 1).

IMiDs

Thalidomide inhibits angiogenesis through multiple potential mechanisms, including inhibition of proangiogenic signals such as VEGF, basic fibroblast growth factor, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α.14 In addition, this agent has T-cell costimulatory activity and immunomodulatory properties. Phase I/II studies using high doses of thalidomide have yielded low PSA response rates.15 However, in a randomized phase II trial of weekly docetaxel with or without low-dose thalidomide, PSA responses, time to disease progression, and OS appeared to be greater in the combination arm.16 Toxicities with thalidomide include deep venous thrombosis, sedation, neuropathy, constipation, and fatigue. Notably, a phase II trial using a 3-drug combination of docetaxel, thalidomide, and bevacizumab showed PSA responses in the 80% range, although neurotoxicity was prohibitive with this combination.17 Several phase I and II studies have also examined the related agent lenalidomide, which has been shown to produce PSA responses and partial radiographic responses, both when used alone and when combined with ketoconazole or docetaxel.1821 This agent has less neurotoxicity than thalidomide but more myelosuppression. A placebo-controlled phase III trial of docetaxel with or without lenalidomide in patients with CRPC was recently launched (Table 1). Future studies using this class of agents in men with CRPC will probably focus on lenalidomide over thalidomide, because of the milder toxicity profile and lack of neurologic sequelae with lenalidomide, especially because these agents may be administered in combination or in sequence with docetaxel.

Tasquinimod

Another angiogenesis-inhibiting agent that has received renewed attention is the oral quinoline derivative tasquinimod. Although the antiangiogenic properties of this agent have been amply demonstrated in multiple in vitro and in vivo prostate cancer models,22 the exact mechanism of action of this drug remains elusive and appears to be unrelated to VEGF receptor inhibition. Impressively, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase II study involving 200 patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic CRPC demonstrated that patients receiving tasquinimod had a median PFS of 7.6 months versus 3.2 months in those receiving placebo (P = .001).23 Adverse events with this agent included gastrointestinal disorders, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, and asymptomatic elevations of pancreatic enzymes and inflammatory markers. Rare but serious toxicities were heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and deep vein thrombosis. A phase III trial of tasquinimod in patients with CRPC is currently in development.

Tumor Vascular–Disrupting Agents

A final antiangiogenic strategy involves the use of agents that primarily act against established tumor blood vessels, disrupting vascular endothelial cells, and causing a range of subsequent antivascular effects.24 The prototype in this class is 5,6-dimethylxanthenoine-4-acetic acid (vadimezan), which was shown to act synergistically with docetaxel in human prostate cancer xenografts.25 In a multicenter randomized phase II trial of docetaxel plus or minus I.V. vadimezan in 74 men with metastatic CRPC, > 30% PSA reductions were observed in 37% and 59% of patients in the control and interventional arms, respectively, and radiographic response rates were 9% and 23%, respectively.26 Adverse events with vadimezan included neutropenia and cardiac toxicities (supraventricular tachycardia, myocardial ischemia).

PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway Inhibitors

mTOR Inhibitors

Although mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors probably have minimal single-agent activity in advanced CRPC,27 the combination of these drugs with docetaxel is attractive given their ability to reverse chemotherapy resistance in prostate cancer cell lines.28 In addition, these agents induce apoptosis when administered in combination with chemotherapy in patients who have activation of the Akt pathway as a result of PTEN mutation/loss or other genetic alterations.29 Several mTOR inhibitors have entered human clinical testing. One of these, everolimus, is currently being evaluated in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of metastatic CRPC in phase I/II trials (Table 1).30,31 In addition, temsirolimus is being tested in combination with antiandrogen therapy in men with chemotherapy-naive CRPC,32 and also as maintenance therapy after response to docetaxel treatment.33 A third mTOR inhibitor, ridaforolimus, is also being investigated in the phase II setting as monotherapy in men with taxane-refractory disease. Toxicities of mTOR inhibitors include maculopapular rash, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia, allergic reactions, pedal edema, mucositis, and thrombocytopenia.

Akt Inhibitors

Advanced prostate cancers frequently demonstrate elevated levels of phosphorylated (activated) Akt.34 In addition to promoting cell survival through the inhibition of apoptosis, the Akt pathway regulates cell growth, proliferation, and angiogenesis via mTOR, and facilitates translation of signals such as c-Myc, cyclin D, and VEGF.35 Disappointingly, a phase II study of an early Akt inhibitor, perifosine, failed to show any clinical activity when used as monotherapy in 19 men with metastatic CRPC.36 A novel oral allosteric Akt inhibitor, MK2206, has recently completed phase I testing,37 and a phase II cooperative group study of this agent in patients with noncastrate PSA-recurrent prostate cancer after local therapy will soon be launched. A further phase I study of MK2206 combined with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors is ongoing (Table 1). Although we are still in the early days of development of this class of agents, optimal use of these drugs will likely require careful selection of patients based on molecular tumor characteristics, and may rely on rational combinations of different drugs targeting separate components of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.

Drugs Targeting Apoptosis

AT-101

The antiapoptotic factor Bcl-2 is an attractive target in the treatment of CRPC, as overexpression of Bcl-2 induces the transition to androgen-independent cell growth,38 and confers resistance to many antineoplastic agents including taxanes.39 AT-101 (R-gossypol acetate) is an oral agent derived from the cottonseed plant that inhibits the function of all Bcl-2–related proteins (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Mcl-1, and Bcl-w), lowering the threshold for cancer cells to undergo apoptosis.40 Preclinically, AT-101 has shown antitumor activity in a variety of tumor types including prostate cancer.41 In a phase I/II study of AT-101 monotherapy in 23 men with metastatic CRPC, ≥ 50% PSA declines were observed in only 9% of men while no patient had a radiologic response.42 Toxicities related to AT-101 were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, anorexia, leukopenia, and hypophosphatemia. More favorable results were seen in a second phase I/II study combining AT-101 together with docetaxel in patients with chemotherapy-naive CRPC; in that study 89% of men showed a ≥ 50% PSA decline and 33% demonstrated partial radiologic responses.43 A multicenter randomized phase II study evaluating docetaxel plus or minus AT-101 in the first-line treatment of metastatic CRPC has completed accrual of 220 patients, and OS results are expected to be reported shortly (Table 2).

Table 2.

Selected Ongoing Clinical Trials of Drugs Targeting Apoptosis in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Target Drug Toxicities Dose Phase Summary of Trial Lead Site Identifier
Apoptosis-Inducing Drugs
Bcl-2 AT-101 Fatigue, diarrhea, emesis, leukopenia, hypophosphatemia 40 mg orally twice a day (days 1–3 every 21 days) II Docetaxel ± AT-101 for first-line metastatic CRPC International study NCT00571675
Clusterin Custirsen Rash, fever, rigors, diarrhea, leukopenia, elevated creatinine 640 mg I.V. every week II Second-line chemotherapy + custirsen for docetaxel-pretreated CRPC University of Montreal NCT00327340
Rash, fever, rigors, diarrhea, leukopenia, elevated creatinine 640 mg I.V. every week III Docetaxel retreatment ± custirsen for docetaxel-refractory CRPC Oregon Health and Science University NCT01083615
Survivin LY2181308 Fever, rigors, influenza-like illness, PTT prolongation 750 mg I.V. every week II Docetaxel ± LY2181308 for first-line metastatic CRPC International study NCT00642018
YM155 Fatigue, diarrhea, fever, proteinuria, cytopenias, 5 mg/m2 I.V. daily over 7 days II Docetaxel + YM155 for first-line metastatic CRPC South Texas Oncology and Hematology NCT00514267
Fatigue, diarrhea, fever, proteinuria, cytopenias 5 mg/m2 I.V. daily over 7 days II Single-agent YM155 for second-line metastatic CRPC Royal Marsden Hospital NCT00257478

Abbreviations: CRPC = castration-resistant prostate cancer; I.V. = intravenous; PTT = partial thromboplastin time

Custirsen

Clusterin is a stress-induced antiapoptotic chaperone protein expressed in various cancers including prostate cancer,44 and functioning as a cytoprotective factor similar to ATP-independent heat shock proteins.45 It mediates its antiapoptotic effects through mechanisms that include inhibition of the proapoptotic protein Bax, prevention of protein aggregation, and enhanced nuclear factor-κB activity.46,47 In cancer, expression of clusterin increases after treatment with androgen ablation or chemotherapy,48,49 conferring a more resistant phenotype. In addition, clusterin expression correlates with higher Gleason scores and progression to CRPC.49 Custirsen is an antisense oligonucleotide drug that inhibits clusterin at the mRNA level by binding to its translation initiation site, increasing sensitivity to androgen deprivation and chemotherapy in prostate cancer cell lines and xenograft models.50,51 A phase I study of I.V. custirsen given together with docetaxel established the optimal dosing and safety of this combination, and also resulted in decreased serum clusterin levels in treated patients.52 In a randomized phase II study of docetaxel with or without custirsen in 82 men with metastatic CRPC, PSA responses (58% vs. 54%) as well as objective responses (19% vs. 25%) and PFS (7.3 months vs. 6.1 months) were similar in both arms. However, OS trended in favor of the custirsen arm (23.8 months vs. 16.9 months; P = .06; HR 0.61, 95% CI, 0.36–1.02), although survival was not the primary endpoint of this study.53 In addition, custirsen decreased median serum clusterin levels by 26%. Adverse events associated with custirsen included fatigue, leukopenia, elevated serum creatinine, fever, rigors, diarrhea, and rash.53 Another phase II study of second-line chemotherapy plus custirsen in men with docetaxel-pretreated CRPC has recently completed accrual (Table 2). A registrational phase III trial of docetaxel retreatment with or without custirsen in the second-line management of patients with docetaxel-refractory disease has recently opened. Indeed, custirsen appears to be one of the most promising apoptosis-targeting agents currently in clinical development for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Survivin Inhibitors

A final class of drugs mediating their effect via the apoptotic pathway are the survivin antagonists. Survivin, one of the most cancer-specific proteins identified to date, has been shown to inhibit apoptosis as well as to enhance cell proliferation and promote tumor angiogenesis in multiple tumor types including prostate cancer.54 Because of its marked upregulation in malignant tissues but not in normal cells, and the observation that its suppression leads to inhibition of tumor growth, survivin has attracted attention as a promising target for anticancer therapies. Two agents in this class that are currently in clinical development include LY2181308 (an antisense oligonucleotide that binds to survivin mRNA)55 and YM155 (a small molecule survivin inhibitor).56 Several phase II studies investigating these 2 drugs in men with metastatic CRPC are under way or have recently completed accrual (Table 2).

IGF Pathway Inhibitors

Cixutumumab

Insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGF-1R) and its ligands may play a key role in prostate carcinogenesis through mechanisms that involve mitogenesis, anti-apoptosis, and cellular transformation. IGF-1R is often overexpressed in prostate tumors and can mediate cell proliferation and resistance to androgen ablation.57,58 Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies that bind to the extracellular domain of IGF-1R can potently inhibit the function of this receptor.59 In prostate cancer cell lines as well as in xenograft models, such antibodies have been shown to inhibit growth of both androgen-dependent and -independent tumors.60,61 Cixutumumab is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that specifically targets IGF-1R, inhibiting ligand binding and IGF signaling.62 In a phase II study of I.V. cixutumumab in 31 men with asymptomatic metastatic CRPC, 29% of patients demonstrated lack of radiographic progression after 6 months, and a greater number had PSA responses.63 Toxicities of this agent were fatigue, hyperglycemia, thrombocytopenia, hyperkalemia, and muscle spasms. A phase II study combining cixutumumab with mitoxantrone in the second-line treatment of docetaxel-refractory disease is currently underway (Table 3). A combination trial of cixutumumab plus temsirolimus in the prechemotherapy space has also recently opened.

Table 3.

Selected Ongoing Clinical Trials of Drugs Targeting the IGF Pathway in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Target Drug Toxicities Dose Phase Summary of Trial Lead Site Identifier
IGF Pathway Inhibitors
IGF-1R Cixutumumab Fatigue, hyperglycemia, thrombocytopenia, hyperkalemia 6 mg/kg I.V. every 1 week II Mitoxantrone + cixutumumab for second-line metastatic CRPC University of Washington, Seattle NCT00683475
Fatigue, hyperglycemia, thrombocytopenia, hyperkalemia 6 mg/kg I.V. every 1 week I/II Cixutumumab + temsirolimus for first-line metastatic CPRC Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center NCT01026623
Figitumumab Fatigue, diarrhea, hyperglycemia, leukopenia 20 mg/kg I.V. every 3 weeks II Docetaxel + figitumumab for first- and second-line CRPC International study NCT00313781

Abbreviations: CRPC = castration-resistant prostate cancer; IGF-1R = insulin-like growth factor receptor-1; I.V. = intravenous

Figitumumab

Figitumumab is the second fully human anti-IGF-1R IgG2 monoclonal antibody to enter clinical testing.64 A phase Ib study of I.V. figitumumab given in combination with docetaxel to men with metastatic CRPC has been completed. In that study, 4 of 18 patients (22%) had a radiographic PR, and 12 men (67%) had disease stabilization for ≥ 6 months.65 In addition, 9 of 10 patients with measurable circulating tumor cell (CTC) counts at baseline had a ≥ 30% decline in CTC numbers. Toxicities of this combination regimen were leukopenia (including neutropenia), fatigue, diarrhea, and hyperglycemia. A phase II study of figitumumab combined with docetaxel in men with chemotherapy-naive (arm A) and docetaxel-resistant (arm B) CRPC is in progress (Table 3).

Src Kinase Inhibitors

Dasatinib

Src is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase signal transduction protein that is involved in multiple pathways in prostate cancer, and is important in tumor cell proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, survival, and transition to androgen-independent growth.66 Src also controls normal and abnormal osteoclast activity, and may be implicated in development and progression of bone metastases.67 Dasatinib is an oral inhibitor of multiple oncogenic kinases including Src. In experimental studies, dasatinib suppressed proliferation of prostate cancer cell lines,68 and inhibited adhesion, migration, and invasion.69 In addition, dasatinib reduced tumor growth and lymph node involvement in a prostate cancer mouse xenograft model.70 A phase II study of dasatinib monotherapy in men with metastatic CRPC did not show significant PSA responses, but 19% of patients were free of disease progression at 6 months. Additionally, more than half of subjects had ≥ 40% decreases in urinary N-telopeptide levels (a marker of bone resorption), and 60% showed reductions in bone alkaline phosphatase.71 In a separate phase I/II study combining dasatinib with docetaxel in a similar patient population, PSA responses were observed in 41% of participants, and 32% of patients with bone metastases showed improvements in bone scans.72 A placebo-controlled randomized phase III OS study evaluating this combination in men with metastatic chemotherapy-naive CRPC is now accruing patients (Table 4).

Table 4.

Selected Ongoing Clinical Trials of Drugs Targeting Src Family Kinases in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Target Drug Toxicities Dose Phase Summary of Trial Lead Site Identifier
Src Kinase Inhibitors
Src Dasatinib Edema, rash, nausea, diarrhea, headache, cytopenias 100 mg orally daily III Docetaxel ± dasatinib for first-line metastatic CRPC Global study NCT00744497
Saracatinib Fatigue, diarrhea, emesis, transaminitis, renal failure, cytopenia 175 mg orally daily II Saracatinib versus zoledronate for bone-metastatic CRPC Wake Forest University NCT00558272
KX2-391 Fatigue, transaminitis, emesis, hypokalemia, cytopenias 40 mg orally twice a day II Single-agent KX2-391 for bone-metastatic CRPC Johns Hopkins University NCT01074138

Abbreviation: CRPC = castration-resistant prostate cancer

Saracatinib

Another oral Src kinase inhibitor, saracatinib, has also been shown to inhibit Src phosphorylation and tumor growth in a murine xenograft model of prostate cancer.73 In a phase II study of single-agent saracatinib in advanced CRPC, 18% of patients had transient PSA reductions but all were < 30%.74 Adverse events with this agent included transaminase elevations, emesis, and lymphopenia. A randomized phase II study of saracatinib versus zoledronate in patients with bone-metastatic CRPC is in progress (Table 4).

KX2-391

A recent addition to the Src inhibitor class is the oral drug, KX2-391, which uniquely targets the peptide-binding domain and does not compete with ATP for binding.75 This agent has been shown to suppress oncogenic proliferation in multiple cancers in vitro and in vivo, including prostate cancer.76 In a phase I trial of KX2-391 monotherapy for patients with advanced refractory malignancies, 1 of 3 men with CRPC had an 81% decline in his PSA level.77 Toxicities with this drug included fatigue, transaminase elevation, hypokalemia, vomiting, and myelosuppression. A phase II study of single-agent KX2-391 in men with bone-metastatic chemotherapy-naive CRPC is currently enrolling patients (Table 4).

Hedgehog Inhibitors

Vismodegib

The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway is a developmental pathway that regulates epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, cell proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis.78 Constitutive overexpression of the Hh ligand has been demonstrated in a number of malignancies including prostate cancer.79,80 In preclinical models, Hh pathway activation renders prostate epithelial cells tumorigenic, and aberrant Hh activity is seen in most advanced and metastatic prostate tumors, including CRPC.81,82 In vitro and in vivo experiments have shown that Hh pathway inhibition decreases prostate cancer cell proliferation and invasiveness while inducing apoptosis.83 Similar results were seen in a prostate cancer xenograft model exposed to inhibitors of Hh-mediated transcription.84 Vismodegib is the first drug in this class to reach clinical testing,85 and a phase I trial of single-agent vismodegib in patients with advanced solid tumors demonstrated impressive clinical activity against metastatic medulloblastoma and basal cell carcinoma,86,87 tumors known to harbor activating mutations of Hh pathway genes. A presurgical phase II study randomizing men with localized prostate cancer to androgen ablation with or without vismodegib before prostatectomy was recently launched (Table 5).

Table 5.

Selected Ongoing Clinical Trials of Other Miscellaneous Targeted Therapies in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Target Drug Toxicities Dose Phase Summary of Trial Lead Site Identifier
Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitors
Hedgehog Vismodegib Fatigue, hyponatremia, anorexia, weight loss, muscle spasms 270 mg orally daily II LHRH agonist ± vismodegib presurgery for prostate cancer MD Anderson Cancer Center NCT01163084
Itraconazole Fatigue, nausea, rash, diarrhea, anorexia, edema, hypokalemia 200 mg/600 mg orally daily II Itraconazole (200 vs. 600 mg) in first-line metastatic CRPC Johns Hopkins University NCT00887458
Epigenetic Therapies
HDAC Panobinostat Fatigue, pruritus, emesis, dysgeusia, anorexia, diarrhea, cytopenias 15 mg/m2 I.V. (days 1 and 8 every 21 days) II Single-agent panobinostat for second-line metastatic CRPC Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center NCT00667862
DNMT Azacitidine Fatigue, fever, emesis, diarrhea, cytopenias, injection-site reactions 150 mg/m2 I.V. (days 1–5 every 21 days) II Docetaxel + azacitidine for second-line metastatic CRPC University of Miami NCT00503984
PARP Inhibitors
PARP Olaparib Fatigue, emesis, dyspepsia, cytopenia, dysgeusia, anorexia 400 mg orally twice a day II Olaparib in BRCA-mutated solid tumors including CRPC Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Israel NCT01078662
ABT-888 Fatigue, nausea, dysgeusia, dizziness, cytopenias 40 mg orally twice a day (days 1–7 every 28 days) II ABT-888 + temozolomide in docetaxel-refractory CRPC University of Michigan NCT01085422
Pro-Drug Approaches
Thapsigargin G-202 Unknown Dose escalation I Single-agent G-202 in advanced solid tumors including CRPC Johns Hopkins University NCT01056029

Abbreviations: CRPC = castration-resistant prostate cancer; DNMT = DNA methyltransferase; HDAC = histone deacetylase; I.V. = intravenous; LHRH = luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone; PARP = poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase

Itraconazole

Another agent with surprising Hh-inhibitory activity is the antifungal drug itraconazole. In vitro studies have shown that itraconazole potently inhibits proliferation of the Hh reporter cell line NIH 3T3, while other azole antifungals (eg, ketoconazole) do not possess this activity. In addition, itraconazole induced tumor growth inhibition in a mouse medulloblastoma model (ptch1+/− p53−/−) that has constitutive overactivation of Hh signaling.88 In this murine allograft model, serum levels of itraconazole required for tumor inhibition were equivalent to those achieved in man using 600 mg of itraconazole daily. In addition, it has been shown that itraconazole possesses antiangiogenic and mTOR-inhibitory properties.89,90 A randomized phase II trial examining 2 doses of itraconazole (200 mg vs. 600 mg) in men with metastatic CRPC has just completed accrual (Table 5).

Epigenetic Approaches

HDAC Inhibitors

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are regulators of histone acetylation status which is critical for androgen receptor-mediated transcriptional activation of genes governing cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis.91 Vorinostat is an oral HDAC inhibitor that has shown antitumor activity in prostate cancer cell lines and animal models.92 However, a phase II study of vorinostat monotherapy in men with docetaxel-refractory CRPC did not show significant PSA or radiologic responses and was associated with a high frequency of adverse events including fatigue, emesis, anorexia, diarrhea, and weight loss.93 A second HDAC inhibitor, panobinostat, has completed phase I testing (used both as an oral and intravenous agent) in combination with docetaxel94,95; the I.V. formulation has been chosen for future development. A phase II trial of single-agent I.V. panobinostat in docetaxel-refractory disease is ongoing (Table 5).

DNMT Inhibitors

DNA methylation of key tumor suppressor genes represents another epigenetic mechanism by which prostate cancer may progresses to a castration-resistant state.96 The hypomethylating agent azacitidine is a subcutaneously administered drug that exerts its antineoplastic effects by inhibiting DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) in promoter regions of genes, leading to reversal of gene silencing.97 In experimental in vitro and in vivo prostate cancer models, azacitidine reverses resistance to androgen ablation and chemotherapy,98 making this agent attractive for clinical trial development. To this end, a phase II study of azacitidine in men with chemotherapy-naive CRPC caused lengthening of PSA doubling times in 65% of patients and resulted in a median PFS of 12.6 weeks.99 Toxicities of this agent included fatigue and neutropenia. Another phase II study evaluating the combination of docetaxel and azacitidine in men with docetaxel-pretreated CRPC is now underway (Table 5).

PARP Inhibitors

Olaparib

PARPs are a family of enzymes that mend single-strand DNA breaks through the repair of base excisions. PARP inhibition leads to accumulation of single-strand DNA breaks which, if left unchecked, lead to double-strand DNA breaks at replication forks.100 These double-strand breaks are repaired through the process of homologous recombination, mediated in part by the tumor suppressor proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2. Preclinical studies have shown that BRCA1/2 mutation combined with PARP inhibition creates a “synthetic lethality” for such cells.101 This results in exquisite sensitivity of BRCA1/2 mutant cells to PARP inhibitors. Another group of tumors that show increased sensitivity to PARP inhibition are those that harbor PTEN loss, a frequent occurrence in CRPC. PTEN null tumors exhibit genomic instability because of downregulation of Rad51 and impaired homologous recombination, or defects in cell cycle checkpoints.102 Olaparib was the first PARP inhibitor to enter clinical trials. In a phase I study of oral olaparib used in 22 patients with BRCA1/2-mutated tumors, this agent produced notable responses in several subjects including a > 50% PSA decline and resolution of bone metastases in a patient with BRCA2-related CRPC.103 Toxicities with this agent include fatigue/somnolence, mood alterations, thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal symptoms. A larger phase II study of olaparib in patients with advanced BRCA1/2-mutated cancers is ongoing (Table 5).

ABT-888

Another important property of PARP inhibitors is their ability to enhance the activity of DNA-damaging cytotoxic agents (eg, alkylators, platinums, topoisomerase inhibitors).104 To this end, the addition of the PARP inhibitor ABT-888 to temozolomide potentiates the antineoplastic effects of the alkylating agent in several cancer cell lines as well as animal xenograft models.105 This has led to the design of a single-arm phase II study examining the combination of oral ABT-888 and oral temozolomide in men with metastatic CRPC who have progressed after 1–2 previous chemotherapies (Table 5). Adverse events with ABT-888 are minimal, and no dose-limiting toxicities have been reported in phase I trials.

Pro-Drug Approaches

G-202

An intriguing notion in cancer treatment is the use of prodrug chemotherapy, aiming to achieve higher concentrations of cytotoxic or biologically active agents in tumors while sparing normal tissues. This can be accomplished when an inert form of a cytotoxin, the prodrug, is converted to an active agent at the tumor site. G-202 is a prodrug of thapsigargin, a non–cell-type specific toxin derived from the plant Thapsia garganica that has the ability to kill a broad spectrum of cancer cell lines and normal endothelial cells.106 It consists of a cytotoxic analogue of thapsigargin linked to a masking peptide that inhibits its biologic activity until proteolytic cleavage occurs at the tumor site.107 The masking peptide of G-202 is a substrate for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) which is found only on prostate cancer cells and solid tumor endothelial cells. When inactive G-202 reaches a PSMA-expressing cell, proteolytic cleavage by PSMA results in release of the thapsigargin analogue into the cancer cell where it induces a pronounced increase in the concentration of cytosolic calcium through blockade of the sarcoplasmic-endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA) pump.108 This increase in intracellular calcium leads to induction of apoptosis and cell death. In preclinical studies, G-202 administration in mice bearing human tumor xenografts (including PSMA-producing prostate cancer xenografts) has been shown to result in rapid tumor regression or growth inhibition.109 A first-in-man phase I trial of I.V. G-202 in patients with advanced solid tumors has recently been launched (Table 5).

Conclusion

With an ever growing number of agents now available for the management of CRPC, and an explosion of novel targeted therapies making their way through the developmental pipeline, several new challenges arise. First, it must be determined how these approved and experimental therapies should best be sequenced in individual patients with CRPC. Second, strategies will need to be developed to optimally combine agents in a rational and scientific manner, taking advantage of knowledge of negative feedback loops to overcome resistance to monotherapies. Third, smarter trials must be designed with the goal of quickly and reliably identifying agents that do not hold promise, while enabling those that do to move swiftly to registrational studies. Finally, more careful patient selection based on clinical or molecular characteristics should be performed to identify the subset of men most likely to respond to a particular targeted therapy. Meanwhile, continued advances in our understanding of prostate cancer progression, through both genomics and cancer stem cell biology, will certainly further expand our armamentarium of molecularly targeted therapeutics for CRPC in the future.

Footnotes

Disclosures

Dr. Antonarakis has no relevant relationships to disclose. Dr. Carducci has served as a consultant for Amgen, Astellas Pharma US Inc., AstraZeneca, Genentech, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Pfizer Inc., and sanofi-aventis.

References

  • 1.Duque JL, Loughlin KR, Adam RM, et al. Plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor are increased in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Urology. 1999;54:523–7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00167-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.George DJ, Halabi S, Shepard TF, et al. Prognostic significance of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9480. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:1932–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fox WD, Higgins B, Maiese KM, et al. Antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor slows growth of an androgen-independent xenograft model of prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:3226–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sweeney P, Karashima T, Kim SJ, et al. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antibody reduces tumorigenicity and metastasis in orthotopic prostate cancer xenografts via induction of endothelial cell apoptosis and reduction of endothelial cell matrix metalloproteinase type 9 production. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:2714–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Picus J, Halabi S, Rini B, et al. The use of bevacizumab with docetaxel and estramustine in hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC): Initial results of CALGB 90006. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003;22(suppl):22s. (abstract 1578) [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Di Lorenzo G, Figg WD, Fossa SD, et al. Combination of bevacizumab and docetaxel in docetaxel-pretreated hormone-refractory prostate cancer: A phase 2 study. Eur Urol. 2008;54:1089–96. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kelly WK, Halabi S, Carducci MA, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial comparing docetaxel, prednisone, and placebo with docetaxel, prednisone, and bevacizumab in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Survival results of CALGB 90401. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15 suppl):344s. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.4767. (abstract LBA4511) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dahut WL, Scripture C, Posadas E, et al. A phase II clinical trial of sorafenib in androgen-independent prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:209–14. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aragon-Ching JB, Jain L, Gulley JL, et al. Final analysis of a phase II trial using sorafenib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2009;103:1636–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08327.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dror Michaelson M, Regan MM, Oh WK, et al. Phase II study of sunitinib in men with advanced prostate cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:913–20. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sonpavde G, Periman PO, Bernold D, et al. Sunitinib malate for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:319–24. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chu QS. Aflibercept: an alternative strategy for inhibiting tumour angiogenesis by vascular endothelial growth factors. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009;9:263–71. doi: 10.1517/14712590802666397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Isambert N, Freyer G, Zanetta S, et al. A phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of intravenous aflibercept (VEGF trap) plus docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors: preliminary results. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15 suppl):177s. (abstract 3599) [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bartlett JB, Dredge K, Dalgleish AG. The evolution of thalidomide and its IMiD derivatives as anticancer agents. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:314–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Figg WD, Dahut W, Duray P, et al. A randomized phase II trial of thalidomide, an angiogenesis inhibitor, in androgen-independent prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:1888–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dahut WL, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, et al. Randomized phase II trial of docetaxel plus thalidomide in androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2532–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ning YM, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, et al. Phase II trial of bevacizumab, thalidomide, docetaxel, and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2070–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dreicer R, Garcia J, Smith S, et al. Phase I/II trial of GM-CSF and lenalidomide in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18 suppl):651s. (abstract 15515) [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Garcia JA, Triozzi P, Elson P, et al. Clinical activity of ketoconazole and lenalidomide in castrate progressive prostate carcinoma: Preliminary results of a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15 suppl):285s. (abstract 5143) [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Petrylak DP, Resto-Garces K, Tibyan M, et al. A phase I open-label study using lenalidomide and docetaxel in castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(suppl):abstract 5156. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lestingi TM, Tolzien K, Kelby SK, et al. Safety and activity of lenalidomide in elderly patients with chemotherapy-naive, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15 suppl):abstract e15125. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Isaacs JT, Pili R, Qian DZ, et al. Identification of ABR-215050 as lead second generation quinoline-3-carboxamide anti-angiogenic agent for the treatment of prostate cancer. Prostate. 2006;66:1768–78. doi: 10.1002/pros.20509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pili R, Haggman M, Stadler WM, et al. A randomized, multicenter, international phase II study of tasquinimod in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15 suppl):344s. (abstract 4510) [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McKeage MJ. The potential of DMXAA (ASA404) in combination with docetaxel in advanced prostate cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008;17:23–9. doi: 10.1517/13543784.17.1.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McKeage MJ, Kelland LR. 5,6-dimethylxanthenoine-4-acetic acid (DMXAA) clinical potential in combination with taxane-based chemotherapy. Am J Cancer. 2006;5:155–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pili R, Rosenthal MA, Mainwaring PN, et al. Phase II study on the addition of ASA404 (vadimezan; 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid) to docetaxel in CRMPC. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:2906–14. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Figlin RA, Brown E, Armstrong AJ, et al. NCCN Task Force Report: mTOR inhibition in solid tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008;6(suppl 5):S1–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Morgan TM, Pitts TE, Gross TS, et al. RAD001 (everolimus) inhibits growth of prostate cancer in the bone and the inhibitory effects are increased by combination with docetaxel and zoledronic acid. Prostate. 2008;68:861–71. doi: 10.1002/pros.20752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Thomas G, Speicher L, Reiter R, et al. Demonstration that temsirolimus preferentially inhibits the mTOR pathway in the tumors of prostate cancer patients with PTEN deficiencies. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;24:9132s. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ross RW, Manola J, Oh WK, et al. Phase I trial of RAD001 and docetaxel in castration resistant prostate cancer with FDG-PET assessment of RAD001 activity. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15 suppl):266s. (abstract 5069) [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gross ME, Soscia J, Sakowsky S, et al. Phase I trial of RAD001, bevacizumab, and docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15 suppl):272s. (abstract 5154) [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Armstrong AJ, Kemeny G, Turnbull JD, et al. Impact of temsirolimus and anti-androgen therapy on circulating tumor cell (CTC) biology in men with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (CRPC): A phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15 suppl):43s. (abstract TPS249) [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Emmenegger U, Sridhar SS, Booth CM, et al. A phase II study of maintenance therapy with temsirolimus after response to first-line docetaxel chemotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(suppl):15s. (abstract TPS246) [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Graff JR. Emerging targets in the Akt pathway for treatment of androgen-independent prostatic adenocarcinoma. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2002;6:103–13. doi: 10.1517/14728222.6.1.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gera JF, Mellinghoff IK, Shi Y, et al. Akt activity determines sensitivity to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors by regulating cyclin D1 and c-myc expression. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2737–46. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309999200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Posadas EM, Gulley J, Arlen PM, et al. A phase II study of perifosine in androgen independent prostate cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005;4:1133–7. doi: 10.4161/cbt.4.10.2064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yap TA, Patnaik, Fearen AI, et al. First-in-class phase I trial of a selective Akt inhibitor, MK2206, evaluating alternate day (QOD) and once weekly (QW) doses in advanced cancer patients with evidence of target modulation and antitumor activity. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15 suppl):235s. (abstract 3009) [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Raffo AJ, Perlman H, Chen MW, et al. Overexpression of bcl-2 protects prostate cancer cells from apoptosis in vitro and confers resistance to androgen depletion in vivo. Cancer Res. 1995;55:4438–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Apakama I, Robinson MC, Walter NM, et al. Bcl-2 overexpression combined with p53 protein accumulation correlates with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:1258–62. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Loberg RD, McGregor N, Ying C, et al. In vivo evaluation of AT-101 (R-gossypol acetic acid) in androgen-independent growth of VCaP prostate cancer cells in combination with surgical castration. Neoplasia. 2007;9:1030–7. doi: 10.1593/neo.07778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jiang J, Sugimoto Y, Liu S, et al. The inhibitory effects of gossypol on human prostate cancer cells PC3 are associated with transforming growth factorβ1 (TGFβ1) signal transduction pathway. Anticancer Res. 2004;24:91–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu G, Kelly WK, Wilding G, et al. An open-label, multicenter, phase I/II study of single-agent AT-101 in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:3172–6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.MacVicar GR, Curti B, Somer B, et al. An open-label, multicenter, phase I/II study of AT-101 in combination with docetaxel and prednisone in men with hormone refractory prostate cancer. Presented at: the American Society of Clinical Oncology: 2008 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium; February 14–16, 2008; San Francisco, CA. p. Abstract 152. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zoubeidi A, Chi K, Gleave M. Targeting the cytoprotective chaperone, clusterin, for treatment of advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:1088–93. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Humphreys DT, Carver JA, Easterbrook-Smith SB, et al. Clusterin has chaperone-like activity similar to that of small heat shock proteins. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:6875–81. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.11.6875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang H, Kim JK, Edwards CA, et al. Clusterin inhibits apoptosis by interacting with activated Bax. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:909–15. doi: 10.1038/ncb1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zoubeidi A, Ettinger S, Beraldi E, et al. Clusterin facilitates COMMD1 and I-kappaB degradation to enhance NF-kappaB activity in prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2010;8:119–30. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.July LV, Akbari M, Zellweger T, et al. Clusterin expression is significantly enhanced in prostate cancer cells following androgen withdrawal therapy. Prostate. 2002;50:179–88. doi: 10.1002/pros.10047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Miyake H, Nelson C, Rennie PS, et al. Acquisition of chemoresistant phenotype by overexpression of the antiapoptotic gene testosterone-repressed prostate message-2 in prostate cancer xenograft models. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2547–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gleave M, Miyake H. Use of antisense oligonucleotides targeting the cytoprotective gene, clusterin, to enhance androgen- and chemo-sensitivity in prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2005;23:38–46. doi: 10.1007/s00345-004-0474-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sowery RD, Hadaschik BA, So AI, et al. Clusterin knockdown using the antisense oligonucleotide OGX-011 re-sensitizes docetaxel-refractory prostate cancer PC-3 cells to chemotherapy. BJU Int. 2008;102:389–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chi KN, Siu LL, Hirte H, et al. A phase I study of OGX-011, a 2-methoxyethyl phosphorothioate antisense to clusterin, in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:833–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chi KN, Hotte SJ, Yu EY, et al. Randomized phase II study of docetaxel and prednisone with or without OGX-011 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4247–54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.8771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ryan BM, O’Donovan N, Duffy MJ. Survivin: a new target for anti-cancer therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35:553–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Talbot DC, Davies J, Callies S, et al. First human dose study evaluating safety and pharmacokinetics of LY2181308, an antisense oligonucleotide designed to inhibit survivin. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15 suppl):157s. (abstract 3518) [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Satoh T, Okamoto I, Miyazaki M, et al. Phase I study of YM155, a novel survivin suppressant, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:3872–80. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Ma J, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and IGF binding protein-3 as predictors of advanced stage prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1099–106. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.14.1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Krueckl SL, Sikes RA, Edlund NM, et al. Increased insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor expression and signaling are components of androgen-independent progression in a lineage-derived prostate cancer progression model. Cancer Res. 2004;64:8620–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kojima S, Inahara M, Suzuki H, et al. Implications of insulin-like growth factor-1 for prostate cancer therapies. Int J Urol. 2009;16:161–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02224.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wu JD, Odman A, Higgins LM, et al. In vivo effects of the human type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor antibody A12 on androgen-dependent and androgen-independent xenograft human prostate tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:3065–74. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Plymate SR, Haugk K, Coleman I, et al. An antibody targeting the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor enhances the castration-induced response in androgen-dependent prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:6429–39. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rowinsky EK, Youssoufian H, Tonra JR, et al. IMC-A12, a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody to the insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:5549s–55. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Higano C, Alumkal J, Ryan CJ, et al. A phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of single-agent IMC-A12, a monoclonal antibody against the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-IR), as monotherapy in patients with metastatic, asymptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15 suppl):269s. (abstract 5142) [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gualberto A. Figitumumab (CP-751,871) for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10:575–85. doi: 10.1517/14712591003689980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Molife LR, Fong PC, Paccagnella L, et al. The insulin-like growth factor-I receptor inhibitor figitumumab (CP-751,871) in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours: results of a phase Ib dose-escalation, open-label study. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:332–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wheeler DL, Iida M, Dunn EF. The role of Src in solid tumors. Oncologist. 2009;14:667–78. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Araujo J, Logothetis C. Targeting Src signaling in metastatic bone disease. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:1–6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lombardo LJ, Lee FY, Chen P, et al. Discovery of N-(2-chloro-6-methyl-phenyl)-2-(6-(4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazin-1-yl)-2-methylpyrimidin-4-yl-amino)thiazole-5-carboxamide, a dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor with potent antitumor activity in preclinical assays. J Med Chem. 2004;47:6658–61. doi: 10.1021/jm049486a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nam S, Kim D, Cheng JQ, et al. Action of the Src family kinase inhibitor, dasatinib (BMS-354825), on human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9185–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Park SI, Zhang J, Phillips KA, et al. Targeting SRC family kinases inhibits growth and lymph node metastases of prostate cancer in an orthotopic nude mouse model. Cancer Res. 2008;68:3323–33. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yu EY, Wilding G, Posadas E, et al. Phase II study of dasatinib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7421–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Araujo J, Armstrong AJ, Braud EL, et al. Dasatinib and docetaxel combination treatment for patients with castration-resistant progressive prostate cancer: A phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15 suppl):249s. (abstract 5061) [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chang YM, Bai L, Liu S, et al. Src family kinase oncogenic potential and pathways in prostate cancer as revealed by AZD0530. Oncogene. 2008;27:6365–75. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lara PN, Jr, Longmate J, Evans CP, et al. A phase II trial of the Src-kinase inhibitor AZD0530 in patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer: a California Cancer Consortium study. Anticancer Drugs. 2009;20:179–84. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e328325a867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hangauer D, Gelman I, Dyster L, et al. Potent and selective in vitro and in vivo inhibition of tumor proliferation by KX01, a novel non-ATP competitive Src inhibitor. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2007:abstract 3245. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bu Y, Gao L, Smolinsk M, et al. KX01 (KX2-391), a Src-family kinase inhibitor targeting the peptide-binding domain, suppresses oncogenic proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2008:abstract 4983. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Adjei AA, Cohen RB, Kurzrock R, et al. Results of a phase I trial of KX2-391, a novel non-ATP competitive substrate-pocket directed Src inhibitor, in patients with advanced malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15 suppl):148s. doi: 10.1007/s10637-013-9929-8. (abstract 3511) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ingham PW, McMahon AP. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 2001;15:3059–87. doi: 10.1101/gad.938601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Karhadkar SS, Bova GS, Abdallah N, et al. Hedgehog signaling in prostate regeneration, neoplasia and metastasis. Nature. 2004;431:707–12. doi: 10.1038/nature02962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Berman DM, Desai N, Wang X, et al. Roles for Hedgehog signaling in androgen production and prostate ductal morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2004;267:387–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sheng T, Li C, Zhang X, et al. Activation of the hedgehog pathway in advanced prostate cancer. Mol Cancer. 2004;3:29. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-3-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Shaw G, Price AM, Ktori E, et al. Hedgehog signaling in androgen independent prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;54:1333–43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sanchez P, Hernandez AM, Stecca B, et al. Inhibition of prostate cancer proliferation by interference with sonic hedgehog-GLI1 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:12561–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404956101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lauth M, Bergstrom A, Shimokawa T, et al. Inhibition of GLI-mediated transcription and tumor cell growth by small-molecule antagonists. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:8455–60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609699104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.De Smaele E, Ferretti E, Gulino A. Vismodegib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the hedgehog pathway for the treatment of advanced cancers. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2010;11:707–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Rudin CM, Hann CL, Laterra J, et al. Treatment of medulloblastoma with hedgehog pathway inhibitor GDC-0449. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1173–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Von Hoff DD, LoRusso PM, Rudin CM, et al. Inhibition of the hedgehog pathway in advanced basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1164–72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kim J, Tang JY, Gong R, et al. Itraconazole, a commonly used antifungal that inhibits Hedgehog pathway activity and cancer growth. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:388–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.02.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Chong CR, Xu J, Lu J, et al. Inhibition of angiogenesis by the antifungal drug itraconazole. ACS Chem Biol. 2007;2:263–70. doi: 10.1021/cb600362d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Xu J, Dang Y, Ren YR, et al. Cholesterol trafficking is required for mTOR activation in endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:4764–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910872107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Nakayama T, Watanabe M, Suzuki H, et al. Epigenetic regulation of androgen receptor gene expression in human prostate cancers. Lab Invest. 2000;80:1789–96. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Welsbie DS, Xu J, Chen Y, et al. Histone deacetylases are required for androgen receptor function in hormone-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69:958–66. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Bradley D, Rathkopf D, Dunn R, et al. Vorinostat in advanced prostate cancer patients progressing on prior chemotherapy (NCI Trial 6862): trial results and interleukin-6 analysis: a study by the Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial Consortium and University of Chicago Phase 2 Consortium. Cancer. 2009;115:5541–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Rathkopf DE, Chi KN, Vaishampayan U, et al. Phase Ib dose finding trial of intravenous panobinostat with docetaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15 suppl):250s. (abstract 5064) [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Rathkopf D, Wong BY, Ross RW, et al. A phase I study of oral panobinostat alone and in combination with docetaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;66:181–9. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1289-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hoque MO. DNA methylation changes in prostate cancer: current developments and future clinical implementation. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009;9:243–57. doi: 10.1586/erm.09.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Stresemann C, Lyko F. Modes of action of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitors azacitidine and decitabine. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:8–13. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Festuccia C, Gravina G, D’Alessandro A, et al. Azacitidine improves antitumor effects of docetaxel and cisplatin in aggressive prostate cancer models. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2009;16:401–13. doi: 10.1677/ERC-08-0130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Sonpavde G, Aparicio AM, Delaune R, et al. Azacitidine for castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing on combined androgen blockade. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15 suppl):292s. (abstract 5172) [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Rouleau M, Patel A, Hendzel MJ, et al. PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:293–301. doi: 10.1038/nrc2812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Boss DS, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH. Inducing synthetic lethality using PARP inhibitors. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2010;5:192–5. doi: 10.2174/157488410791498798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Mendes-Pereira AM, Martin SA, Brough R, et al. Synthetic lethal targeting of PTEN mutant cells with PARP inhibitors. EMBO Mol Med. 2009;1:315–22. doi: 10.1002/emmm.200900041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:123–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Donawho CK, Luo Y, Luo Y, et al. ABT-888, an orally active poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that potentiates DNA-damaging agents in preclinical tumor models. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2728–37. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Palma JP, Wang YC, Rodriguez LE, et al. ABT-888 confers broad in vivo activity in combination with temozolomide in diverse tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7277–90. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Christensen SB, Skytte DM, Denmeade SR, et al. A Trojan horse in drug development: targeting of thapsigargins towards prostate cancer cells. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2009;9:276–94. doi: 10.2174/1871520610909030276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Denmeade SR, Jakobsen CM, Janssen S, et al. Prostate-specific antigen-activated thapsigargin prodrug as targeted therapy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:990–1000. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.13.990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Søhoel H, Jensen AM, Møller JV, et al. Natural products as starting materials for development of second-generation SERCA inhibitors targeted towards prostate cancer cells. Bioorg Med Chem. 2006;14:2810–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Vander Griend DJ, Antony L, Dalrymple SL, et al. Amino acid containing thapsigargin analogues deplete androgen receptor protein via synthesis inhibition and induce the death of prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009 doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-1136. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES