Skip to main content
Hepatitis Monthly logoLink to Hepatitis Monthly
. 2014 May 5;14(5):e11608. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.11608

Acetyl-L-Carnitine Supplementation During HCV Therapy With Pegylated Interferon-α 2b Plus Ribavirin: Effect on Work Performance; A Randomized Clinical Trial

Giulia Malaguarnera 1, Manuela Pennisi 2, Caterina Gagliano 3, Marco Vacante 3, Michele Malaguarnera 1,3,*, Salvatore Salomone 1, Filippo Drago 1, Gaetano Bertino 4, Filippo Caraci 5,6, Giuseppe Nunnari 7, Mariano Malaguarnera 3
PMCID: PMC4030263  PMID: 24910702

Abstract

Background:

The health status of employees with chronic hepatitis C has major implications for organizations and labour market.

Objectives:

To assess the effects of Acetyl-L-Carnitine administration on work productivity, daily activity, and fatigue in subjects with chronic hepatitis C treated with Pegylated-Interferon-α2b and Ribavirin.

Patients and Methods:

In this prospective, randomized, placebo controlled, double blind clinical trial, 30 subjects (Group A) with chronic hepatitis, received Pegylated-Interferon-α2b (1.5 mg/kg per week) plus Ribavirin and placebo, while 32 subjects (Group B) received the same dosage of Pegylated-Interferon-α2b plus Ribavirin plus 2g Acetyl-L-Carnitine twice per day, for 12 months. Work productivity loss, impairment in daily activities, presenteeism, absenteeism, have been assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. We also evaluated severity of fatigue, mental fatigue and physical fatigue.

Results:

Significant difference were observed in physical fatigue, mental fatigue and severity of fatigue, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and viremia after 12 months treatment. In Group B we observed a significant decrease of presenteeism and daily activity impairment after 6 months, 12 months and at follow up. A significant increase of work productivity was observed after 12 months and at follow up.

Conclusions:

Office workers with chronic hepatitis C, treated with Pegylated-Interferon-α2b plus Ribavirin, had work performance loss. In subjects treated with Acetyl-L-Carnitine supplementation we observed increased daily activity and reduced presenteeism and fatigue. Acetyl-L-Carnitinegroup had a smaller reduction of productivity comparing to placebo group.

Keywords: Acetyl Lcarnitine, Interferon, Ribavirin, Hepatitis C, Fatigue, Quality of Life

1. Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is currently a major health problem. HCV affects 4.1 million people in the United States, of whom 3.2 million are estimated to be chronically infected (1). Administration of Pegylated Interferon-a (Peg-INF-a) and Ribavirin (RBV) may reach eradication rates of 75%–80% in patients with HCV genotypes 2 and 3 and between 45% and 52% in patients with genotype 1 (2, 3). HCV infection not only compromises health related quality of life, but has been also associated with social marginalization, impairment of intimate and family relationships, reduced sense of well-being due to fear of transmission and prognosis, fatigue, hopelessness and depression (4, 5). HCV is one of the few infections, in addition to HIV, which is heavily linked to psychiatric disorders (6). The health status of employees with chronic hepatitis C has major implications for organizations and labour market. Acetyl-L-carnitine is a versatile endogenous molecule present in mammalian metabolism. Carnitine is synthesized from the essential aminoacids lysine and methionine in kidney, liver and brain (7). L-carnitine, acetyl-L-carnitine and various carnitine enzymes play a relevant role in cellular energy production (8) being involved in the carriage of long-chain fatty acids into the mitochondrial matrix for beta oxidation (9). Previous studies showed that carnitine and its derivatives reduce depression, both physical and mental fatigue, improves cognitive functions and quality of life (10, 11). In HCV patients treated with IFN alone or with ribavirin we observed that L-carnitine supplementation improves biochemical response and increases hematological pattern (12). In recent years occupational therapies have been developed for various pathologies that focus on quality of life including physical and mental health. Most of these intervention showed some improvement on quality of life or on other physical and psychological outcomes, but did not pay attention to the aspect of work which is considered to be an important contributor to the quality of life.

2. Objectives

We assessed the effects of ALC administration on changes in work productivity, daily activity, and fatigue in subjects with chronic hepatitis C treated with Peg-IFN-a and RBV. The primary outcome was the assessment of changes in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment and Fatigue Severity Scale scores; the secondary analysis included evaluation of liver function tests (AST, ALT) and viremia.

3. Patients and Methods

The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind clinical trial. The study was conducted at the Department of Senescence, Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania (Italy), between January 2010 and December 2011. 62 patients have been enrolled (36 males, 26 females) (Table 1). The patients received Peg-IFN-a 2b plus ribavirin (group A; n = 30) and placebo or Peg-IFN-a 2b plus ribavirin plus Acetyl-L-Carnitine (group B; n = 32) for a 12-month period (Figure 1). Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (Group A and Group B) and stratified according to HCV genotype (1 vs. others) and viral load (< 600,000 vs. > 600,000 IU/mL). Patients were randomized into two groups (Acetyl-L-carnitine and placebo) using permuted-block randomization with an allocation ratio of 1:1 and a block size of 4. Randomization was performed by an independent statistician. Random numbers were assigned to patients according to the sequence of their inclusion and patients received respective study products. Both clinical investigators and patients were blind to the product given. Peg-IFN-a 2b (1.5 mg/kg per week) plus RBV and placebo were administered to subjects in Group A. The dose of RBV was 800mg for body weight less than 60 kg, 1,000 mg between 60 and 75 kg, and 1,200 mg more than 75 kg. Subjects in Group B received Peg-IFN-a 2b and RBV plus 2 g ALC administered twice a day per os. Subjects were evaluated before starting therapy, after 6 and 12 months. A follow-up was carried out 6 months after the end of the treatment. Eligible patients were workers who were 18 years of age or older, were infected by HCV and had a quantifiable serum HCV RNA level (as determined by polimerase chain reaction, COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan – ROCHE). HCV infected populations must had elevated serum alanine transaminase levels and findings on liver biopsy consistent with chronic infection. Cirrhotic patients had to have a Child-Pugh score less than 7 to be eligible. Ineligible patients were those who had other liver diseases, as well as those who were affected by cancer, severe jaundice, pulmonary and renal chronic diseases, prostatic diseases, autoimmune diseases and diabetes mellitus. None of the patients made excessive use of alcohol (>20 g/die) or hepato-toxic drugs. Other causes of exclusion included decompensated cirrhosis, pregnancy, and contraindications for Peg-IFN-a or RBV therapy such as cardiopathy, hemoglobinopathies, hemocromatosis, major depression or other severe psychiatric pathological conditions. Clinical evaluations, hematochemical, virological, instrumental and histological analysis were performed on these patients. All subjects underwent a physical examination and medical interview before treatment. Study recruitment was performed in observation and respect of Helsinki Declaration (13). All patients gave their informed consent for the study participation and for each invasive procedure they underwent. All sensitive data were collected and protected in respect of present privacy statements.

Table 1. Patients Characteristics at Liver Biopsy a.

Parameter Group A, n = 30, (Peg-IFNα + RBV+ Placebo) Group B, n = 32, (Peg-IFNα + RBV + ALC) P Value
Male 18 (60) 18 (56) 0.764
Female 12 (40) 14 (46) 0.764
Route of transmission of HCV (No of patients)
Blood transfusion 14 (46) 10 (31) 0.211
Intravenous drug abuse 4 (13) 7 (21) 0.378
Occupational 2 (6) 3 (9) 0.696
Unknown 10 (33) 12 (40) 0.727
HCV genotype
1a 1 (3) 2 (6) 0.596
1b 25 (83) 24 (80) 0.417
2a 2 (6) 2 (6) 0.944
3a 2 (6) 4 (12) 0.435
Blue collars (manual labourers) 12 (40) 10 (31) 0.471
White collar (non manual/office labourers) 18 (60) 22 (68) 0.471
Fibrosis Score
F0 4 (13) 5 (15) 0.794
F1 5 (16) 4 (12) 0.638
F2 13 (43) 10 (31) 0.327
F3 5 (16) 9 (28) 0.280
F4 3 (10) 4 (12) 0.756

a Data are presented in No. %.

Figure 1. Trial Profile of Peg-IFNα2b Plus RBV Plus ALC Treatment.

Figure 1.

3.1. Serum Analysis

All patients underwent a complete virological assay for HBV and HCV. HBsAg (Hepatitis B surface Antigen), anti-HBc IgG (Hepatitis B “core” IgG Antibody), HBeAg (Hepatitis B “e” Antigen), HBeAb (Hepatitis B “e” Antibody), HBV-DNA (Hepatitis B Virus DNA), anti-Delta (Delta virus antibody) assays were performed. Anti-HCV antibodies were determined by ELISA (Enzyme-Linked immunosorbent assay ELISA. assay - Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Raritan, NJ, USA). HCV-RNA (Hepatitis C Virus RNA) levels were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of HCV-RNA 5’UTR using COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan (Roche Diagnostics Systems, Branchburg, N.J). Serum samples negative for HCV RNA were re-tested using a more sensitive standardized qualitative PCR assay with a lower limit of detection of about 100 copies/mL to confirm HCV-RNA disappearance. HCV genotypes and subtypes were identified (14). HCV viral genotypes were determined by restriction analysis of HCV-RNA 5’ UTR (15). AST and ALT (Aspartate Aminotransferase and Alanine Aminotransferase), γGT (gamma GlutamilTranferase), total, conjugated and unconjugated bilirubin, serum proteins analysis were performed. Genetic testing to identify hemochromatosis HFE gene mutations was performed in order to exclude subjects with hereditary hemochromatosis. All liver function tests, hematochemical measurements and virological analysis have been executed in the laboratory of our hospital with automated and standardized methods, in conformity to the quality certified standards EN ISO 9001:2000.

3.2. Histological Grading Assessment

Patients underwent ultrasound-assisted percutaneous biopsy: tissue specimens were obtained with Menghini modified needles (Automatic Aspiration Needle for Liver Biopsy, ACR 16G, 11 cm, manufactured by Sterylab Srl, Milan-Italy). A biopsy was considered adequate for evaluation if the specimen was > 1.5 cm long and contained a minimum of 6 portal tracts. Knodell and Ishak Histological activity index (HAI) score was used to assess the histological grading of the disease (16). The METAVIR scoring system was used to stage liver fibrosis as follows: F0, no fibrosis; F1, portal fibrosis without septa; F2, portal fibrosis and few septa; F3, numerous septa without cirrhosis; F4, cirrhosis (17).

3.3. Assessment of Fatigue

Wessely and Powell’s test was used to evaluate mental fatigue (total score: 0–10) and physical fatigue (total score: 0–16) (18). Severity of fatigue was evaluated by a self-assessed questionnaire (Fatigue severity scale - FSS) [score range: 1 (no signs of fatigue) to 7 (most disabling fatigue); total score: 9-63] (19).

3.4. WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment)

WPAI is a self-administered questionnaire that was used to evaluate work productivity (20, 21). Subjects were asked information about the number of total working hours, the hours lost due to HCV treatment, the effects on productivity during the past week. We obtained scores for work productivity loss, absenteeism, presenteeism, and impairment in regular daily activities: Absenteeism = hours missed/hours missed + hours worked; Presenteeism = scale score/10; Work productivity loss = absenteeism + (hours worked x presenteeism); Daily activity impairment = scale score/10. The results were converted to percentages. FSS and WPAI questionnaires were not validated for Italian population.

3.5. Efficacy and Safety Assessment

We performed an intention-to-treat (ITT) efficacy analysis. ‘‘Sustained virological responders’’ (SVR) were patients with not identifiable serum HCV RNA at the end of the study. We considered the “relapse” as undetectable HCV-RNA levels at the end of treatment but detectable levels during the follow-up period. Reasons for discontinuation of the treatment were severe adverse events and absence of compliance.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as means ± standard deviations. Quantitative data were compared by paired or unpaired Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test; the χ-square test was used for analysis of qualitative data. Considering the study power of 90%, type one error of 5%, with respect to 20% ofdropouts, the sample size for each group was determinedto be 30 (9). All results shown in this manuscript were analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analysis were performed using SPSS 15.0 (Chicago, IL).

4. Results

Demographics characteristics were analogous between the two groups at baseline. The most frequent viral genotype was 1b (Table 1). 28 subjects in Group A and 31 subjects in Group B completed the treatment. The non responders were respectively 14 and 13 (50% vs. 42%), the relapsers were 5 and 7 (18% vs. 22%) and the SVR were 9 and 11 (32% vs. 36%) (Figure 1).

4.1. Effect of ALC on Work Productivity and Fatigue

In Group A physical fatigue decreased after 6 months (P = 0.0194). No significant differences were observed as regards absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment (Table 3). In Group B after 6-12 months and at follow up we observed a significant decrease in physical fatigue (P < 0.0001), mental fatigue (P < 0.0001), and FSS (P = 0.0006). We observed a significant decrease of presenteeism after 6 months (P = 0.0458), 12 months (P = 0.0159) and at follow up (P = 0.0257). Daily activity impairment was also decreased after 6 months (P = 0.0240), 12 months (P = 0.0031) and at follow up (P = 0.0186). A significant increase of work productivity was observed after 12 months (P = 0.0112) and at follow up (P = 0.0298). The comparison between Group A and Group B showed a significant difference after 6 months in physical fatigue (- 1.4 versus -3.3; P = 0.0014) and FSS (- 1.8 versus - 8.3; P = 0.0075). After 12 months, we observed a significant difference in physical fatigue (-1.2 versus -7.0; P < 0.0001), mental fatigue (-0.4 versus -2.2; P < 0.0001) and FSS (–4.0 versus -15.0; P < 0.0001). At follow up, there were significant differences in physical fatigue (-1.0 versus -4.1; P < 0.0001) and FSS (-0.3 versus –11.3; P < 0.0001).

Table 3. Characteristics of Subjects at Baseline, After 12 Months, and at Follow-up, Values Are Expressed as Mean (SD) a.

Before Treatment After 6 Months P-Value 1b Diff P Value 2c After 12 Months PValue b Diff PValue c Follow-up PValue b Diff Pvalue c
AST, IU/l 154 (41.2) 87.2 (38.1) < 0.0001 66.800 0.0044 61.8 (24.1) < 0.0001 92.200 < 0.0001 65.2 (24.7) < 0.0001 88.800 0.0013
ALT, IU/l 175.2 (41.8) 112.4 (40.7) < 0.0001 62.800 0.0004 77.2 (15.8) < 0.0001 98.000 < 0.0001 74.2 (20.2) < 0.0001 101.000 < 0.0001
Bilirubin, mmol/l 10.7 (8.7) 10.8 (7.1) 0.9613 -0.100 0.6846 10.6 (6.9) 0.9608 0.100 0.7510 10.9 (6.8) 0.9213 -0.200 0.6167
Albumin, g/dl 4.2 (0.9) 4.1 (0.8) 0.6509 0.100 1.0000 4.1 (0.9) 0.6685 0.100 0.5698 4.2 (0.8) 1.0000 0.000 1.0000
Viremia, 10 6 copies/ml 5.16 (3.08) 3.25 (2.41) 0.0097 1.9100 0.2187 2.88 (1.67) 0.0007 2.2800 0.0047 2.96 (1.72) 0.0012 2.2000 0.0063
HAI 10.6 (3.4) - - - - 8.8 (3.0) 0.0338 1.800 0.3129 - - - -

a Group A Peg-IFN α + RBV + Placebo (n = 30).

b Test mean during time with use of pair sample t test.

c Test mean between differences of two group with use of Students t-test.

4.2. Effect of ALC on Transaminases, Viremia and HAI

In Group A, there was a significant decrease in AST (P < 0.0001) and ALT (P < 0.0001) after 6-12 months and at follow up. Viremia was significantly reduced after 6 months (P = 0.0097), 12 months (P = 0.0007), and at follow up (P = 0.0012) (Table 2). HAI score decreased after 12 months (P = 0.0338). In the group that was treated with Peg-IFNα plus RBV plus ALC we observed a significant decrease in AST (P < 0.0001) and ALT (P < 0.0001), after 6-12 months, and at follow up. A significant decrease in HAI score (P = 0.0005) was observed after 12 months. A decrease in viremia was observed after 6 months (P = 0.0007), 12 months (P < 0.0001), and at follow up (P < 0.0001). The comparison between group A and group B showed a significant difference after 12 months in AST (-123.2 versus -93.1; P < 0.0001), ALT (-138.1 versus –98.4; P < 0.0001), and viremia (-3.2 versus –2.2; P = 0.0047). At follow up, we observed a significant difference in AST (-110.4 versus –89.7; P = 0.0013). Adverse events observed in both groups are reported in Table 4.

Table 2. Patients Characteristics at Liver Biopsy, Values Are Expressed as Mean (SD).

Parameter Group A, n = 30, (Peg-IFNα + RBV + Placebo) Group B, n = 32, (Peg-IFNα + RBV + ALC) P Value
Mean age, y 44.9 (4.2) 48.6 (3.8) 0.0006
HCV exposure time, y 6.44 (4.8) 6.35 (4.9) 0.942
BMI, kg/m 2 26.8 (4.2) 26.4 (4.8) 0.728
Plasma glucose, (mmol/l) (normal 3.9-6.4) 5.81 (0.86) 5.77 (0.84) 0.853
AST, IU/l, (normal 15-50) 171 (39.1) 185.4 (38.2) 0.147
ALT, IU/l, (normal 15-50) 190.4 (39.8) 188.8 (37.9) 0.871
Viremia, 10 6 copies/ml 5.11 (2.46) 5.16 (2.84) 0.941
CRP, mg/dL, (normal <1.0) 4.9 (0.5) 5.1 (0.61) 0.164
HAI 10.6 (3.4) 10.8 (3.4) 0.817

Table 4. WPAI and Fatigue Scores in the Study Population, Values Are Expressed as Mean (SD).

Group B Peg IFN α + RBV + ALC (n = 32)
Before Treatment After 6 Months P Value a Diff P Value b After 12 Months P Value a Diff P Value b Follow-up P Value a Diff P Value b
Absenteeism 5.4 (10.8) 3.2 (11.4) 0.4311 2.200 0.5634 3.0 (10.8) 0.3775 2.400 0.6022 4.1 (10.6) 0.6287 1.300 0.9697
Presenteeism 38.4 (21.2) 27.8 (20.4) 0.0458 10.600 0.6582 25.6 (20.1) 0.0159 12.800 0.4183 26.4 (20.8) 0.0257 12.000 0.4912
Work productivity loss 40.1 (23.4) 29.1 (24.1) 0.0687 11.000 0.8269 26.4 (18.2) 0.0112 13.700 0.5099 28.2 (19.2) 0.0298 11.900 0.4670
Daily activityimpairment 45.4 (24.2) 31.8 (22.8) 0.0240 13.600 0.6744 27.8 (21.4) 0.0031 17.600 0.2439 31.4 (22.1) 0.0186 14.000 0.3931
Physical fatigue 12.0 (2.1) 8.7 (1.9) < 0.0001 3.300 0.0014 5.0 (2.4) < 0.0001 7.000 < 0.0001 7.9 (2.3) < 0.0001 4.100 < 0.0001
Mental fatigue 6.4 (1.8) 4.7 (1.4) < 0.0001 1.700 0.0175 4.21 (1.2) < 0.0001 2.1900 < 0.0001 4.6 (1.3) < 0.0001 1.800 0.0013
Fatigue severity scale 49.1 (9.6) 40.8 (8.7) 0.0006 8.300 0.0075 34.1 (8.4) 0.0006 15.000 < 0.0001 37.8 (9.2) 0.0006 11.300
Group A Peg-IFN α + RBV + Placebo (n = 30)
Absenteeism 5.0 (9.4) 4.8 (10.2) 0.9373 0.200 0.5634 4.4 (10.2) 0.8136 0.600 0.6022 4.0 (10.0) 0.6913 1.000 0.9697
Presenteeism 32.2 (20.8) 30.2 (22.1) 0.7194 2.000 0.6582 30.0 (22.4) 0.6949 2.200 0.4183 30.2 (22.4) 0.7214 2.000 0.4912
Work productivity loss 38.2 (21.8) 30.4 (22.4) 0.1770 7.800 0.8269 29.8 (22.1) 0.1437 8.400 0.5099 32.1 (22.7) 0.2928 6.100 0.4670
Daily activity impairment 41.8 (20.9) 34.2 (21.9) 0.1744 7.600 0.6744 34.1 (20.7) 0.1570 7.700 0.2439 36.2 (21.8) 0.3140 5.600 0.3931
Physical fatigue 11.8 (2.4) 10.4 (2.1) 0.0194 1.400 0.0014 10.6 (2.4) 0.0577 1.200 < 0.0001 10.8 (2.3) 0.1048 1.000 < 0.0001
Mental fatigue 6.1 (1.7) 5.6 (1.5) 0.2320 0.500 0.0175 5.7 (1.4) 0.3240 0.400 < 0.0001 5.8 (1.5) 0.4715 0.300 0.0013
Fatigue severity scale 48.2 (8.4) 46.4 (7.1) 0.3738 1.800 0.0075 44.2 (8.7) 0.0752 4.000 < 0.0001 47.9 (8.7) 0.8924 0.300 < 0.0001

a Test mean during time with use of pair sample t test.

b Test mean between differences of two group with use of Students t-test.

Table 5. Adverse Events Observed in the Study Population a.

Group A (n = 30) (Peg-IFNα + RBV + placebo) Group B (n = 32) (Peg-IFNα + RBV + ALC) P Value
Psychological disorders 8 3 0.075
Hypercholesterolemia 18 34 0.000
Fatigue 55 46 0.000
Headache 47 41 0.000
Musculoskeletal pain 48 36 0.000
Myalgia 55 31 0.000
Hypertriglyceridemia 36 28 0.000
Nausea 25 18 0.020
Anorexia 14 11 0.322
Irritability 24 18 0.045
Hyperglycemia 12 6 0.065
Weight loss 11 6 0.114

a Data are presented as %.

5. Discussion

HCV and IFN-treatment have shown elevated risk factors for adverse psychosocial health outcomes from work-place stress/conditions. In HCV patients treated with IFN we observed an increase in depressed or irritable mood, feelings of overwhelming sadness or seeming inability to feel emotions; a marked decrease of interest in activities and hobbies that are normally enjoyed, friends, socializing and a loss of libido; a decreased ability to focus, concentrate or make decisions, memory loss; an increase of mental and physical fatigue severity; a decreased level of energy and changes in activity levels (22-25). As far as we know, few studies have been carried out to date to show a relationship between work and HCV therapy. In Group A we observed a not significant decline of work productivity and activity impairment. In Group B we observed a significant decrease of presenteeism (P < 0.05) and daily activity impairment (P < 0.05) after 6 months and a decrease of presenteeism, work productivity, and daily activity impairment after 12 months (P < 0.01). Fatigue is the most common extra hepatic manifestation of HCV infection with a prevalence of 50% (26-28). IFN-induced fatigue in HCV–infected individuals is associated with some molecular signatures of inflammatory pathways. HCV diagnosis was found to have deteriorating effects on social functioning in most of the studies. In addition to prolonged physical or mental fatigue, qualitative research has also identifiers personal problems such as cognitive limitations, difficulty mobilizing support, difficulty coping with a new self image and changed attitude to work. The treatment with pegylated interferon-α plus ribavirin impairs work performance among office workers, which may lead to a substantial loss to work productivity. The disease burden and its treatment have an indirect cost, such as low employment, absence from work and impaired productivity, and a decrease in quality of life (29, 30). Loss of work productivity may occur through either absenteeism (absence, early leaving) or presenteeism. Presenteeism describes productivity loss when employees come to work but are not fully productive. In white collar workers, scarce accuracy represents the most important modifications in mental functions. The changes affect the whole human processing information system (e.g. the sensoriperceptive system, the cognitive system and the motor system). IFN-alpha induced acute confusional states presenting with psychomotor retardation, disorientation, parkinsonism and psychosis. In HCV patients, an improvement in work capability could reflect higher work productivity as well as better well being and quality of life. The limitations of this study include the small number of patients. Even though we observed an improvement in work performance in both white and blue collars, a larger study population should be considered to obtain more detailed information. It was difficult to evaluate whether the improvement in work performances was due to ALC supplementation or to the therapy with interferon and ribavirin. In previous studies we demonstrated that supplementation with L-carnitine and its derivatives increase the sustained virological response in patients treated with interferon and ribavirin (12). In fact, in sustained virological responders, absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment are decreased compared with non responders. Treatment with Peg-IFN and ribavirin led to a reduction in work productivity and to an increase in absenteeism and presenteeism after the 1 month therapy and subsequently after 6 months. Effects of Peg-IFN and ribavirin decrease over time. In HCV patients, an improvement in work capability could reflect higher work productivity as well as better well being and quality of life.Future studies are needed to explore these associations more deeply and develop new approaches to diminish their consequences at the workplace.

Acknowledgments

GM and MM were supported by the International PhD programme in Neuropharmacology, University of Catania, Italy.

Footnotes

Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:The employment status of workers with chronic hepatitis C has important implications for society, labour market, and for social and psychological health of individuals. Office workers with HCV treated with ALC supplementation increase their work productivity, daily activity and show reduced presenteeism, and fatigue.

Authors’ Contribution:All Authors contributed equally to this paper.

Financial Disclosure:Authors declared they have no conflict of interests.

Funding/Support:This trial was supported by a grant from the Ministero dell’Università e Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (MIUR).

References

  • 1.Armstrong GL, Wasley A, Simard EP, McQuillan GM, Kuhnert WL, Alter MJ. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1999 through 2002. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):705–14. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Rustgi VK, Shiffman M, Reindollar R, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial. The Lancet. 2001;358(9286):958–65. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06102-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Foster GR. Quality of life considerations for patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat. 2009;16(9):605–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2009.01154.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hadziyannis SJ, Koskinas JS. Differences in epidemiology, liver disease and treatment response among HCV genotypes. Hepatol Res. 2004;29(3):129–35. doi: 10.1016/j.hepres.2004.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Spiegel BM, Younossi ZM, Hays RD, Revicki D, Robbins S, Kanwal F. Impact of hepatitis C on health related quality of life: a systematic review and quantitative assessment. Hepatology. 2005;41(4):790–800. doi: 10.1002/hep.20659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schaefer M, Capuron L, Friebe A, Diez-Quevedo C, Robaeys G, Neri S, et al. Hepatitis C infection, antiviral treatment and mental health: a European expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2012;57(6):1379–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rebouche CJ. Carnitine function and requirements during the life cycle. FASEB J. 1992;6(15):3379–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Malaguarnera M. Carnitine derivatives: clinical usefulness. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28(2):166–76. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283505a3b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Malaguarnera M, Vacante M, Bertino G, Neri S, Malaguarnera M, Gargante MP, et al. The supplementation of acetyl-L-carnitine decreases fatigue and increases quality of life in patients with hepatitis C treated with pegylated interferon-alpha 2b plus ribavirin. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2011;31(9):653–9. doi: 10.1089/jir.2011.0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Malaguarnera M, Bella R, Vacante M, Giordano M, Malaguarnera G, Gargante MP, et al. Acetyl-L-carnitine reduces depression and improves quality of life in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011;46(6):750–9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2011.565067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Malaguarnera M. Acetyl-L-carnitine in hepatic encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis. 2013;28(2):193–9. doi: 10.1007/s11011-013-9376-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Malaguarnera M, Vacante M, Giordano M, Motta M, Bertino G, Pennisi M, et al. L-carnitine supplementation improves hematological pattern in patients affected by HCV treated with Peg interferon-alpha 2b plus ribavirin. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(39):4414–20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i39.4414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 1997;277(11):925–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stuyver L, Wyseur A, van Arnhem W, Hernandez F, Maertens G. Second-generation line probe assay for hepatitis C virus genotyping. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(9):2259–66. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.9.2259-2266.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Simmonds P, Alberti A, Alter HJ, Bonino F, Bradley DW, Brechot C, et al. A proposed system for the nomenclature of hepatitis C viral genotypes. Hepatology. 1994;19(5):1321–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Knodell RG, Ishak KG, Black WC, Chen TS, Craig R, Kaplowitz N, et al. Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology. 1981;1(5):431–5. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840010511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bedossa P, Poynard T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology. 1996;24(2):289–93. doi: 10.1002/hep.510240201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wessely S, Powell R. Fatigue syndromes: a comparison of chronic "postviral" fatigue with neuromuscular and affective disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52(8):940–8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.8.940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol. 1989;46(10):1121–3. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wahlqvist P, Carlsson J, Stalhammar NO, Wiklund I. Validity of a Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire for patients with symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (WPAI-GERD)--results from a cross-sectional study. Value Health. 2002;5(2):106–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.52101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reilly MC, Bracco A, Ricci JF, Santoro J, Stevens T. The validity and accuracy of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire--irritable bowel syndrome version (WPAI:IBS). Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20(4):459–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Malaguarnera M, Laurino A, Di Fazio I, Pistone G, Castorina M, Guccione N, et al. Neuropsychiatric effects and type of IFN-alpha in chronic hepatitis C. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2001;21(5):273–8. doi: 10.1089/107999001300177457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Modabbernia A, Poustchi H, Malekzadeh R. Neuropsychiatric and psychosocial issues of patients with hepatitis C infection: a selective literature review. Hepat Mon. 2013;13(1):e11608. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.8340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ashrafi M, Modabbernia A, Dalir M, Taslimi S, Karami M, Ostovaneh MR, et al. Predictors of mental and physical health in non-cirrhotic patients with viral hepatitis: a case control study. J Psychosom Res. 2012;73(3):218–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Malaguarnera M, Vicari E, Calogero A, Cammalleri L, Di Fazio I, Gargante MP, et al. Sexual dysfunction in chronic hepatitis C virus patients treated with interferon alpha and ribavirin. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2008;28(10):603–9. doi: 10.1089/jir.2008.0021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rampello L, Vecchio I, Malaguarnera M, Rampello L. Parkinsonism with cognitive impairment. Acta Medica Mediterranea. 2012;28:123. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Caraci F, Bosco P, Leggio GM, Malaguarnera M, Drago F, Bucolo C, et al. Clinical pharmacology of novel anti-Alzheimer disease modifying medications. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13(15):1853–63. doi: 10.2174/15680266113139990141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Poynard T, Cacoub P, Ratziu V, Myers RP, Dezailles MH, Mercadier A, et al. Fatigue in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat. 2002;9(4):295–303. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2002.00364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vacante M, Malaguarnera G, Pennisi M, Grosso G, Salomone S, Drago F, et al. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Capecitabine. J Cancer Ther. 2013;4(7):1224–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Malaguarnera G, Pennisi M, Grosso G, Vacante M, Salomone S, Drago F, et al. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Capecitabine. J Cancer Ther. 2013;4(7):1198–202. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Hepatitis Monthly are provided here courtesy of Brieflands

RESOURCES